Next Article in Journal
A Note on Factorization and the Number of Irreducible Factors of xnλ over Finite Fields
Previous Article in Journal
Variable Selection for Generalized Single-Index Varying-Coefficient Models with Applications to Synergistic G×E Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Two-Stage Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization

1
Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China
2
School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2025, 13(3), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030470
Submission received: 19 December 2024 / Revised: 27 January 2025 / Accepted: 28 January 2025 / Published: 31 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section E: Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

The core issue in handling constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOP) is how to maintain a balance between objectives and constraints. However, existing constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) often fail to achieve the desired performance when confronted with complex feasible regions. Building upon this theoretical foundation, a two-stage archive-based constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (CMOEA-TA) based on genetic algorithms(GA) is proposed. In CMOEA-TA, First stage: The archive appropriately relaxes constraints based on the proportion of feasible solutions and constraint violations,compelling the population to explore more search space. Second stage: Sharing valuable information between the archive and the population, while embedding constraint dominance principles to enhance the feasibility of solutions. In addition an angle-based selection strategy was used to select more valuable solutions to increase the diversity of the population. To verify its effectiveness, CMOEA-TA was tested on 54 CMOPs in 4 benchmark suites and 7 state-of-the-art algorithms were compared. The experimental results show that it is far superior to seven competitors in inverse generation distance (IGD) and hypervolume (HV) metrics.
Keywords: constrained multi-objective optimization; evolutionary algorithm; two-stage; archive constrained multi-objective optimization; evolutionary algorithm; two-stage; archive

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Zhao, S.; Zeng, H.; Chen, J. Two-Stage Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization. Mathematics 2025, 13, 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030470

AMA Style

Zhang K, Zhao S, Zeng H, Chen J. Two-Stage Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization. Mathematics. 2025; 13(3):470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030470

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kai, Siyuan Zhao, Hui Zeng, and Junming Chen. 2025. "Two-Stage Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization" Mathematics 13, no. 3: 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030470

APA Style

Zhang, K., Zhao, S., Zeng, H., & Chen, J. (2025). Two-Stage Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization. Mathematics, 13(3), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030470

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop