Next Article in Journal
Value at Risk Estimation Using the GARCH-EVT Approach with Optimal Tail Selection
Next Article in Special Issue
On Degenerate Truncated Special Polynomials
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitatively Inferring Three Mechanisms from the Spatiotemporal Patterns
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Chebyshev Difference Equation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bounds of Generalized Proportional Fractional Integrals in General Form via Convex Functions and Their Applications

by
Gauhar Rahman
1,
Thabet Abdeljawad
2,3,4,*,
Fahd Jarad
5 and
Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar
6,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal 18000, Upper Dir, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics and General Sciences, Prince Sultan University, P. O. Box 66833, 11586 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
4
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
5
Department of Mathematics, Çankaya University, Etimesgut, Ankara 06790, Turkey
6
Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Aldawser 11991, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(1), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010113
Submission received: 14 December 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 11 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Functions and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, our objective is to apply a new approach to establish bounds of sums of left and right proportional fractional integrals of a general type and obtain some related inequalities. From the obtained results, we deduce some new inequalities for classical generalized proportional fractional integrals as corollaries. These inequalities have a connection with some known and existing inequalities which are mentioned in the literature. In addition, some applications of the main results are presented.

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus is an area of mathematics that studies the differentiation and integration of arbitrary order. This calculus has been attracting many researchers because of the astoishing results obtained when fractional operators were used in modeling a variety of real world problems. Thus, these operators have been conisdred as one the most powerful tools in the area of mathematical modeling. Many engineering, physical, chemical, and biological phenomena can be modeled by employing differential equations containing fractional derivatives. The applications of fractional integrals and derivatives can be found in [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
It can be observed from the works in the literature that one of most important pecularities of the fractional operators is the fact that they are non-local. However, for the last few years, there has been an interest in the local derivatives with non-integer order. Although these types of derivatives can be used in modeling too, they are usually not considered as fractional operators. Nevertheless, these local derivatives succeeded to allure many scientists. There are various definitions of the local derivatives. One of the most well known local derivatives is the conformable integrals and derivatives, which were introduced for the first time by Khalil et al. [14]. In [15], Abdeljawad introduced certain properties of the fractional conformable derivative operators. Also, he gave the idea of how to employ the conformable derivative operators to define further more general fractional integral and derivative operators. The disadvantage of the conformable derivative is that the function is not obtained when the order of the conformable derivative is zero. In [16], Anderson and Unless introduced the idea of local proportional derivatives that produce the function when the order of the derivative is zero. Later on, Jarad et al. [17] introduced non-local fractional derivatives and integrals benefiting from the iteration of the proportional integrals. Abdeljawad and Baleanu [18] studied certain monotonicity results for fractional difference operators with discrete exponential kernels. In [19], Abdeljawad and Baleanu introduced fractional derivative with exponential kernel and their discrete version. Atangana and Baleanu [20] established certain new fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernels. In [21], Caputo and Fabrizio defined fractional derivatives without a singular kernel. Losada and Nieto [22] studied certain properties of fractional derivatives without a singular kernel. A verity of such type of new definitions of fractional integrals and derivatives promotes future research to establish more new ideas and fractional integral inequalities by utilizing new fractional derivative and integral operators.
In [23,24], the authors established certain weighted Grüss type inequalities and some other inequalities containing Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Nisar et al. [25] studied several inequalities for extended gamma and confluent hypergeometric k-functions. Nisar et al. [26] presented Gronwall inequalities involving the generalized Riemann–Liouville and Hadamard k-fractional derivatives with applications. In [27], Rahman et al. proved certain inequalities involving the generalized fractional integral operators. In [28,29], Grüss type inequalities in the setting of generalized fractional integrals were found and some applictions were introduced. Liu et al. [30] presented several interesting integral inequalities. Sarikaya and Budak [31] have presented the generalization of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals and their applications. In [32], using some fractional integral operators, Set et al. established Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities. Meanwhile, Agarwal et al. [33] employed generalized k-fractional integral operators for the sake of establishing Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities. Dahmani [34] presented a variety of integral inequalities by using some families of n positive functions. In [35], Aldhaifallah et al. introduced some integral inequalities for a certain family of n ( n N ) positive continuous and decreasing functions on some intervals employing what is called generalized ( k , s ) -fractional integral operators. Recently, some researchers introduced a verity of certain interesting inequalities, applications, and properties for the conformable integrals [36,37,38,39,40].

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we present some well known results.
Definition 1.
Let f : I R be a real valued function. We say that f is convex on interval I, if for all λ [ 0 , 1 ] and x , y I , the following inequality is satisfied
f λ x + ( 1 λ ) y λ f ( x ) + ( 1 λ ) f ( y ) .
Moreover, we say f is concave if the inequality (1) is reversed.
In [41], Jarad et al. defined the following left and right sided generalized proportional fractional integrals.
Definition 2.
The left and right fractional proportional integrals in their general forms are defined by
r I η , δ f ( ρ ) = 1 δ η Γ ( η ) r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ ( ρ θ ) ] ( ρ θ ) η 1 f ( θ ) d θ , r < ρ
and
I s η , δ f ( ρ ) = 1 δ η Γ ( η ) ρ s exp [ δ 1 δ ( θ ρ ) ] ( θ ρ ) η 1 f ( θ ) d θ , ρ < s ,
where the proportional index δ ( 0 , 1 ] and η C and ( η ) > 0 and Γ is the complete gamma function.
Remark 1.
Setting δ = 1 in (2) and (3), then the following left and right Riemann–Liouville integrals are respectively obtained as:
r I η f ( ρ ) = 1 Γ ( η ) r ρ ( ρ θ ) η 1 f ( θ ) d θ , r < ρ
and
I s η f ( ρ ) = 1 Γ ( η ) ρ s ( θ ρ ) η 1 f ( θ ) d θ , ρ < s
where η C and ( η ) > 0 .
The Gronwall inequalities which involve the proportional fractional integral operator can be found in work of Alzabut et al. [42]. Rahman et al. [43] established the Minkowski inequality and other types of inequalities in the frame of the proportional fractional integrals. In [44], Rahman et al. discussed some specific new types of integral inequalities for a class of n ( n N ) positive continuous and decreasing functions on [ r , b ] . Rahman et al. [45] defined the generalized proportional Hadamard fractional integrals and established certain new integral inequalities for convex functions. In [46,47,48,49,50], certain remarkable inequalities, properties, and applications can be found.
In [51], general forms of the proportional fractional integrals (4) and (5) were given as
Definition 3.
Let f : [ r , s ] R be an integrable function and let g C 1 [ r , s ] such that g > 0 on [ r , s ] . Then, the left (forword) and right (backward) proportional fractional integrals of the function f with respect to the function g are respectively defined by
r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) = 1 δ η Γ ( η ) r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] × g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η 1 g ( θ ) f ( θ ) d θ , r < ρ
and
g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) = 1 δ η Γ ( η ) ρ s exp [ δ 1 δ g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) ] × g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) η 1 g ( θ ) f ( θ ) d θ , ρ < s ,
where the proportional index δ ( 0 , 1 ] and η C and ( η ) > 0 and Γ is the well-known gamma function.
Remark 2.
The generalized proportional fractional integrals defined in (6) and (7) are the generalization of the following fractional integrals respectively:
i. 
if we take g ( τ ) = τ , one obtains the left and right sided generalized proportional fractional integral defined in (2) and (3),
ii. 
if we take g ( ρ ) = ρ η η , η > 0 and δ = 1 , we get the left and right sided Katugampola fractional integral operators,
iii. 
if we take δ = 1 , then it reduces to the general form of Riemann–Liouville fractional integral given in [52],
iv. 
if we take g ( ρ ) = ρ and δ = 1 , then it reduces to the left and right Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals (4) and (5),
v. 
if we take g ( ρ ) = ρ δ + λ δ + λ and δ = 1 (where δ ( 0 , 1 ] , λ R + and δ + λ 0 ), then it reduces to the generalized fractional conformable integrals given in [53].

3. Main Results

In this section, we first obtain a bound for the sum of the left and right-sided generalized proportional fractional integrals in their general forms. For this sake, we use convexity and monotonicity of the functions.
Theorem 1.
Let f , g : [ r , s ] R be the functions such that f is convex and positive and g is increasing and differentiable with g L [ r , s ] . Then, for η , ξ 1 and ρ [ r , s ] and δ ( 0 , 1 ] , we have
Γ ( η ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ρ r × [ ( ρ r ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) ( ρ r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( ρ ) f ( r ) r ρ g ( θ ) d θ ] + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 s ρ × [ ( s ρ ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s ρ ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) f ( s ) f ( ρ ) ρ s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Proof. 
Since g is differentiable and increasing, we obtain
exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η 1 exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ,
where ρ [ r , s ] , θ [ r , ρ ] , η 1 , δ ( 0 , 1 ] and g ( θ ) > 0 . Hence, the following inequality holds true
g ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η 1 g ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 .
From the convexity of f, we have
f ( θ ) ρ θ ρ r f ( r ) + θ r ρ r f ( ρ ) .
From (9) and (10), we can write
r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η 1 g ( θ ) f ( θ ) d θ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ρ r × f ( r ) r ρ ( ρ θ ) g ( θ ) d θ + f ( ρ ) r ρ ( θ r ) g ( θ ) d θ .
By using (6), we get
Γ ( η ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ρ r × [ ( ρ r ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) ( ρ r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) ( f ( ρ ) f ( r ) ) r ρ g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Now, for ρ [ r , s ] , θ [ r , ρ ] , ξ 1 , δ ( 0 , 1 ] and g ( θ ) > 0 , the following inequality holds true
g ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 g ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 .
Again, from the convexity of f, we have
f ( θ ) θ ρ s ρ f ( s ) + s θ s ρ f ( ρ ) .
From (12) and (13), the following can be written
g ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 f ( θ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 s ρ × ( θ ρ ) f ( s ) g ( θ ) + ( s θ ) g ( θ ) f ( ρ ) .
Integrating (14) with respect to θ over [ ρ , s ] and then applying (7), we get
Γ ( ξ ) δ ξ g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 s ρ × [ ( s ρ ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s ρ ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) ( f ( s ) f ( ρ ) ) ρ s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Hence, from (11) and (15), we get the desired result. □
Corollary 1.
Let f , g : [ r , s ] R be functions such that f is convex and positive and let g be increasing and differentiable with g L [ r , s ] . Then, for η , ξ 1 and ρ [ r , s ] and δ ( 0 , 1 ] , we have
Γ ( η ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( η ) δ η g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ρ r × [ ( ρ r ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) ( ρ r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( ρ ) f ( r ) r ρ g ( θ ) d θ ] + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η 1 s ρ × [ ( s ρ ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s ρ ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) f ( s ) f ( ρ ) ρ s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Proof. 
By setting η = ξ in Theorem 1, we get the desired Corollary 1. □
Corollary 2.
Setting g ( ρ ) = ρ in Theorem 1, then we get the following inequality for generalized proportional fractional integrals (2) and (3)
Γ ( η ) δ η r I η , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ ) δ ξ I s ξ , δ f ( ρ ) 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ ρ r ] ρ r η f ( r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ s ρ ] s ρ ξ f ( s ) ] + f ( ρ ) 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ ρ r ] ρ r η + exp [ δ 1 δ s ρ ] s ρ ξ ] .
Remark 3.
Setting δ = 1 in Theorem 1, we get the following inequality for generalized Riemann–Liouville fractional integral ([52], Theorem 1).
Γ ( η ) r g I η f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ ) g I s ξ f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η 1 ρ r × [ ( ρ r ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) ( ρ r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( ρ ) f ( r ) r ρ g ( θ ) d θ ] + g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ 1 s ρ [ ( s ρ ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s ρ ) f ( ρ ) g ( ρ ) f ( s ) f ( ρ ) ρ s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Remark 4.
Setting g ( ρ ) = ρ and δ = 1 in Theorem 1, we get integral inequality involving Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals ([54], Theorem 2).
Theorem 2.
Let f , g : [ r , s ] R be functions such that f is differentiable, | f | is convex, and g is also differentiable and increasing with g L [ r , s ] . Then, for η , ξ 0 and ρ [ r , s ] and δ ( 0 , 1 ] , we have
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 × g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ f ( s ) | 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) | f ( r ) | + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ ( s ρ ) | f ( s ) | ] + | f ( ρ ) | 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ ( s ρ ) ] .
Proof. 
From the convexity of | f | , we have
| f ( t ) | ρ θ ρ r | f ( r ) | + θ r ρ r | f ( ρ ) | .
It follows that
f ( t ) ρ θ ρ r | f ( r ) | + θ r ρ r | f ( ρ ) | .
Since g is differentiable and increasing, we have
exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ,
where ρ [ r , s ] , θ [ r , ρ ] , and η > 0 .
From (20) and (21), we can write
exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η f ( θ ) exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ρ r ( ( ρ θ ) | f ( r ) | + ( θ r ) | f ( ρ ) | ) .
Integrating (22) with respect to θ over [ r , ρ ] , we get
r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η f ( θ ) d θ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ρ r × | f ( r ) | r ρ ( ρ θ ) d θ + | f ( ρ ) | r ρ ( θ r ) d θ = exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) × | f ( r ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 2 ,
and
r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η f ( θ ) d θ = exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η f ( θ ) | r ρ r ρ d d θ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η f ( θ ) d θ = exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) + η r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η 1 g ( θ ) f ( θ ) d θ + δ 1 δ r ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) η g ( θ ) f ( θ ) d θ = exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) + Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η × r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) .
Therefore, (23) becomes
Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] × g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) | f ( r ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 2 .
Also, from (19), we can write
f ( t ) ρ θ ρ r | f ( r ) | + θ r ρ r | f ( ρ ) | .
Applying a similar procedure as we applied for (20), we have
exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) × | f ( r ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 2 .
Therefore, from (25) and (27), we get
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) | exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) × | f ( r ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 2 .
Again, from convexity of | f | , we have
| f ( t ) | θ ρ s ρ | f ( s ) | + s θ s ρ | f ( ρ ) | .
Now, for ρ [ r , s ] , θ [ ρ , s ] and ξ > 0 , we have
exp δ 1 δ g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) g ( θ ) g ( ρ ) ξ exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ .
Following the similar procedure as we did for (20), (21) and (26), one can obtain the following result from (29) and (30)
| Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ f ( s ) | exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ ( s ρ ) × | f ( s ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 2 .
Thus, from (28), (31), and together with triangular inequality, we get the desired inequality (18). □
Corollary 3.
Setting η = ξ in Theorem 2, we deduce the following for the generalized proportional fractional integral in general form
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 × g I s η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η f ( s ) | 1 2 exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) | f ( r ) | + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η ( s ρ ) | f ( s ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 1 2 exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η ( ρ r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ] g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η ( s ρ ) .
Corollary 4.
By taking g ( ρ ) = ρ in Theorem 2, we get the following generalized proportional fractional integral inequality for the integrals (2) and (3)
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r I η , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r I η + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ I s ξ , δ f ( ρ ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ ( ρ r ) ρ r η + exp δ 1 δ ( s ρ ) s ρ ξ f ( s ) | 1 2 exp [ δ 1 δ ρ r ] ρ r η + 1 | f ( r ) | + exp [ δ 1 δ s ρ ] s ρ ξ + 1 | f ( s ) | + | f ( ρ ) | 1 2 exp [ δ 1 δ ρ r ] ρ r η + 1 + exp [ δ 1 δ s ρ ] s ρ ξ + 1 .
Remark 5.
By setting δ = 1 in Theorem 2, we get the integral inequality for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals in general form ([52], Theorem 2).
Remark 6.
By taking g ( ρ ) = ρ and δ = 1 in 2, we get the integral inequality for classical Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals ([54], Theorem, 1).
Now, recalling the following Lemma from [54] which will be helpful in the proof of next result.
Lemma 1.
Let f : [ r , s ] R be a symmetric function which is symmetric about r + s 2 , then we have
f r + s 2 f ( ρ ) , ρ [ r , s ] .
Theorem 3.
Let f , g : [ r , s ] R be the functions such that f is convex and positive and g is increasing and differentiable with g L [ r , s ] . Then for η , ξ 0 and ρ [ r , s ] and δ ( 0 , 1 ] , we have
f r + s 2 [ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ g ( s ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ g ( s ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ g ( r ) δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ g ( r ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η g ( r ) + exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η g ( s ) ] Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η + g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ s r [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( s ) f ( r ) × r s g ( ρ ) d ρ ] .
Proof. 
Since g is differentiable and increasing, therefore
exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η ,
where ρ [ r , s ] , θ [ r , ρ ] , η > 0 , δ ( 0 , 1 ] , and g ( θ ) > 0 . Hence, the following inequality holds true
g ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η g ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η .
From the convexity of f, we have
f ( θ ) ρ r s r f ( s ) + s ρ s r f ( r ) .
From (34) and (35), we can write
r s exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ] g ( ρ ) g ( r ) η g ( ρ ) f ( ρ ) d ρ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η s r × f ( s ) r s ( ρ r ) g ( ρ ) d ρ + f ( r ) r s ( s ρ ) g ( ρ ) d ρ .
By using (6), we get
Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η s r × [ ( s r ) f ( ρ ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) ( f ( s ) f ( r ) ) × r s g ( ρ ) d ρ ] .
Now, for ρ [ r , s ] , ξ 0 , δ ( 0 , 1 ] , and g ( ρ ) > 0 , the following inequality holds true
g ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) ξ g ( ρ ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ .
Applying a similar procedure to (35) and (37) as we did for (34) and (35), we have
Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ s r × [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) ( f ( s ) f ( r ) ) × r s g ( ρ ) d ρ ] .
Hence, from (36) and (38), we get the following result
Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r ) exp δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η + g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ s r × [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( s ) f ( r ) × r s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Now, multiplying (32) by
exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η g ( ρ ) ]
and applying Lemma 1 and then integrating with respect to ρ over [ r , s ] , we have
f r + s 2 r s exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η g ( ρ ) d ρ r s exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( ρ ) g ( s ) g ( ρ ) η g ( ρ ) f ( ρ ) d ρ .
Using (6), we get
f r + s 2 [ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ g ( s ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ g ( s ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) η g ( r ) ]
Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) .
Similarly, multiplying (32) by
exp [ δ 1 δ g ( ρ ) g ( r ) g ( ρ ) g ( r ) ξ g ( ρ ) ]
and applying Lemma 1 and then integrating with respect to ρ over [ r , s ] , we have
f r + s 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ g ( s ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ g ( r ) δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I ξ + 1 , δ g ( r ) ] Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r ) .
From (41) and (43), we get
f r + s 2 [ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ g ( s ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ g ( s ) Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ g ( r ) δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ g ( r ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η g ( r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η g ( s ) ] Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r )
Hence, from (39) and (44), we get the desired inequality (33). □
Corollary 5.
By taking η = ξ in (33), we get the following generalized proportional fractional integral inequality in general form
f r + s 2 [ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ g ( s ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ g ( s ) Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η g I s η , δ g ( r ) δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 g I s η + 1 , δ g ( r ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η + 1 ] Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( s ) + Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 g I s η + 1 , δ f ( r ) 2 exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η s r × [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( s ) f ( r ) × r s g ( ρ ) d ρ ] .
Remark 7.
If we set δ = 1 in Theorem 3, we get integral inequality for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals proved by ([52], Theorem 3).
Remark 8.
By setting g ( ρ ) = ρ and δ = 1 in Theorem 3, we get the integral inequality for classical Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals ([54], Theorem 3).

4. Applications

In the following, we study some applications of the results obtained in Section 3. In particular, we establish bounds of generalized proportional fractional integrals which contain bounds of all fractional integrals which are given in Remark 2. By applying Theorem 1, we get the following result.
Theorem 4.
Assume that the conditions of Theorem 1 are satisfied, then we have
Γ ( η ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( ξ ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ f ( ρ ) exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] × g ( s ) g ( r ) η 1 + g ( s ) g ( r ) ξ 1 s r × [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( s ) f ( r ) × r s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Proof. 
If we set ρ = r and ρ = s in (8), we get the desired result (45). □
Corollary 6.
If we set η = ξ in (45), then we get the following generalized proportional fractional integral inequality in general form
Γ ( η ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( ρ ) + Γ ( η ) δ η g I s η , δ f ( ρ ) 2 exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r ) ] g ( s ) g ( r ) η 1 s r × [ ( s r ) f ( s ) g ( s ) ( s r ) f ( r ) g ( r ) f ( s ) f ( r ) × r s g ( θ ) d θ ] .
Corollary 7.
If we set η = δ = 1 and g ( ρ ) = ρ in (46), then we get the right Hadamard inequality
1 s r r s f ( ρ ) d ρ f ( r ) + f ( s ) 2 .
Next, we present the applications of Theorem 2.
Theorem 5.
Assume that the conditions of Theorem 2 are satisfied, then we have
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 × r g I η + 1 , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ g I s ξ , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( ξ + 1 ) δ ξ + 1 g I s ξ + 1 , δ f ( r + s 2 ) exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ξ f ( s ) | s r 2 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] × g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η | f ( r ) | + exp [ δ 1 δ g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ] × g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ξ | f ( s ) | ] + | f ( r + s 2 ) | s r 2 × 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ξ ] .
Proof. 
If we set ρ = r + s 2 in (18), we get the desired inequality (48). □
Corollary 8.
If we set η = ξ in (48), we get the following inequality
| Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η r g I η , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 r g I η + 1 , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + Γ ( η + 1 ) δ ξ g I s η , δ f ( r + s 2 ) + δ 1 δ Γ ( η + 1 ) δ η + 1 g I s η + 1 , δ f ( r + s 2 ) exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η f ( r ) + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) η f ( s ) |
s r 2 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] × g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η | f ( r ) | + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ) ] × g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) η | f ( s ) | ] + | f ( r + s 2 ) | s r 2 1 2 [ exp [ δ 1 δ × ( g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) ) ] g ( r + s 2 ) g ( r ) η + exp [ δ 1 δ ( g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) ) ] g ( s ) g ( r + s 2 ) η ] .
Corollary 9.
If we set η = δ = 1 and g ( ρ ) = ρ , then we get the following inequality
| 1 s r r s f ( ρ ) d ρ f ( r ) + f ( s ) 2 | s r 8 | f ( r ) | + | f ( s ) | + 2 | f r + s 2 | .

5. Concluding Remarks

The generalized proportional fractional integral inequalities for the generalized proportional fractional integrals in general form via convex functions are established in this paper. The obtained results contain a bound for the sum of left and right generalized proportional fractional integrals with dependence on a kernel function and some other inequalities for functions, the absolute values of the derivatives of which are convex. In addition, generalized Hadamard type inequalities for symmetric and convex functions are presented. In particular, these inequalities hold for all the fractional integrals comprises in Remark 2. The inequalities proved in this paper are the generalization of inequalities established earlier by Farid et al. [52] and Farid [54]. In conclusion, one can follow these inequalities to establish further inequalities for other classes of functions related to convex functions by employing generalized proportional fractional integrals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.R. and K.S.N.; Formal analysis, F.J.; Funding acquisition, T.A.; Methodology, T.A. and F.J.; Writing–original draft, G.R. and K.S.N.; Writing–review & editing, T.A., F.J. and K.S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The second author would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM) group number RG-DES-2017-01-17.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caffarelli, L.A.; Salsa, S.; Silvestre, L. Regularity estimates for the solution and the free boundary of the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian. Invent. Math. 2008, 171, 425–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Guo, B.; Pu, X.; Huang, F. Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vázquez, J.L. Recent progress in the theory of nonlinear diffusion with fractional Laplacian operators. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. 2014, 7, 857–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferreira, M.; Vieira, N. Eigenfunctions and Fundamental Solutions of the Fractional Laplace and Dirac Operators: The Riemann–Liouville Case. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2016, 10, 1081–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. El-Nabulsi, R.A. Finite Two-Point Space Without Quantization on Noncommutative Space from a Generalized Fractional Integral Operator. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2018, 12, 1609–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srivastava, H.M.; Lin, S.D.; Wang, P.Y. Some fractional-calculus results for the H-function associated with a class of Feynman integrals. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2006, 13, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Long, Z.; Zhang, Y. Noether’s theorem for fractional variational problem from El-Nabulsi extended exponentially fractional integral in phase space. Acta Mech. 2014, 225, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El-Nabulsi, A.R. Fractional variational problems from extended exponentially fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217, 9492–9496. [Google Scholar]
  9. Botha, J.F.; Cloot, A.H. A generalized groundwater flow equation using the concept of non-integer order. Water SA 2006, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Nabulsi, A.R. Modifications at large distances from fractional and fractal arguments. FRACTALS 2010, 18, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meerschaert, M.M.; Tadjeran, C. Finite difference approximations for fractional advection-dispersion flow equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2004, 172, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  13. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Theory and Applications; Nikol’skĭ, S.M., Ed.; Translated from the 1987 Russian Original, Revised by the Authors; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khalil, R.; Al Horani, M.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abdeljawad, T. On Conformable Fractional Calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2015, 279, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Anderson, D.R.; Ulness, D.J. Newly defined conformable derivatives. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2015, 10, 109–137. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jarad, F.; Ugurlu, E.; Abdeljawad, T.; Baleanu, D. On a new class of fractional operators. Adv. Differ. Equations 2017, 2017, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdeljawad, T.; Baleanu, D. Monotonicity results for fractional difference operators with discrete exponential kernels. Adv. Differ. Equations 2017, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Abdeljawad, T.; Baleanu, D. On Fractional Derivatives with Exponential Kernel and their Discrete Versions. Rep. Math. Phys. 2017, 80, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Atangana, A.; Baleanu, D. New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 2016, 20, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Caputo, M.; Fabrizio, M. A new Definition of Fractional Derivative without Singular Kernel. Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2015, 1, 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  22. Losada, J.; Nieto, J.J. Properties of a New Fractional Derivative without Singular Kernel. Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2015, 1, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahmani, Z.; Tabharit, L. On weighted Gruss type inequalities via fractional integration. J. Adv. Res. Pure Math. 2010, 2, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dahmani, Z. New inequalities in fractional integrals. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2010, 9, 493–497. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nisar, K.S.; Qi, F.; Rahman, G.; Mubeen, S.; Arshad, M. Some inequalities involving the extended gamma function and the Kummer confluent hypergeometric k-function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Nisar, K.S.; Rahman, G.; Choi, J.; Mubeen, S.; Arshad, M. Certain Gronwall type inequalities associated with Riemann–Liouville k- and Hadamard k-fractional derivatives and their applications. East Asian Math. J. 2018, 34, 249–263. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rahman, G.; Nisar, K.S.; Mubeen, S.; Choi, J. Certain Inequalities involving the (k, ρ)-fractional integral operator. Far East J. Math. Sci. 2018, 103, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Dahmani, Z.; Kiris, M.E.; Ahmad, F. (k, s)-Riemann–Liouville fractional integral and applications. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2016, 45, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Set, E.; Tomar, M.; Sarikaya, M.Z. On generalized Grüss type inequalities for k-fractional integrals. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 269, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, W.; Ngǒ, Q.A.; Huy, V.N. Several interesting integral inequalities. J. Math. Inequal. 2009, 3, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Budak, H. Generalized Ostrowski type inequalities for local fractional integrals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2017, 145, 1527–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Set, E.; Noor, M.A.; Awan, M.U.; Gözpinar, A. Generalized Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities involving fractional integral operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Agarwal, P.; Jleli, M.; Tomar, M. Certain Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities via generalized k-fractional integrals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dahmani, Z. New classes of integral inequalities of fractional order. LE MATEMATICHE 2014, LXIX, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aldhaifallah, M.; Tomar, M.; Nisar, K.S.; Purohit, S.D. Some new inequalities for (k, s)-fractional integrals. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 5374–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, C.J.; Rahman, G.; Nisar, K.S.; Ghaffar, A.; Qi, F. Some Inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for k-fractional conformable integrals. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2019, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mubeen, S.; Habib, S.; Naeem, M.N. The Minkowski inequality involving generalized k-fractional conformable integral. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Qi, F.; Rahman, G.; Hussain, S.M.; Du, W.S.; Nisar, K.S. Some inequalities of Čebyšev type for conformable k-fractional integral operators. Symmetry 2018, 10, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rahman, G.; Nisar, K.S.; Qi, F. Some new inequalities of the Gruss type for conformable fractional integrals. AIMS Math. 2018, 3, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahman, G.; Ullah, Z.; Khan, A.; Set, E.; Nisar, K.S. Certain Chebyshev type inequalities involving fractional conformable integral operators. Math. Math. 2019, 7, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Alzabut, J. Generalized fractional derivatives generated by a class of local proportional derivatives. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2017, 226, 3457–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alzabut, J.; Abdeljawad, T.; Jarad, F.; Sudsutad, W. A Gronwall inequality via the generalized proportional fractional derivative with applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rahman, G.; Khan, A.; Abdeljawad, T.; Nisar, K.S. The Minkowski inequalities via generalized proportional fractional integral operators. Adv. Differ. Equations 2019, 2019, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rahman, G.; Abdeljawad, T.; Khan, A.; Nisar, K.S. Some fractional proportional integral inequalities. J. Inequalities Appl. 2019, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rahman, G.; Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Khan, A.; Nisar, K.S. Certain inequalities Via generalized proportional Hadamard fractional integral operators. Adv. Differ. Equations 2019, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Adjabi, Y.; Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T. On Generalized Fractional Operators and a Gronwall Type Inequality with Applications. Filomat 2017, 31, 5457–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdeljawad, T. A Lyapunov type inequality for fractional operators with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler kernel. J. Inequalities Appl. 2017, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abdeljawad, T.; Agarwal, R.P.; Alzabut, J.; Jarad, F.; ÖZbekler, A. Lyapunov-type inequalities for mixed non-linear forced differential equations within conformable derivatives. J. Inequalities Appl. 2018, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Abdeljawad, T. Fractional operators with exponential kernels and a Lyapunov type inequality. Adv. Differ. Equations 2017, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Abdeljawad, T.; Alzabut, J.; Jarad, F. A generalized Lyapunov-type inequality in the frame of conformable derivatives. A generalized Lyapunov-type inequality in the frame of conformable derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equations 2017, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jarad, F.; Alqudah, M.A.; Abdeljawad, T. On more general forms of proportional fractional operators. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.08899. [Google Scholar]
  52. Farid, G.; Nazeer, W.; Saleem, M.S.; Mehmood, S.; King, S.M. Bounds of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals in general form via convex functions and their applications. Mathematics 2018, 6, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Khan, T.U.; Khan, M.A. Generalized conformable fractional integral operators. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Farid, G. Some Riemann–Liouville fractional integral inequalities for convex functions. J. Anal. 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahman, G.; Abdeljawad, T.; Jarad, F.; Nisar, K.S. Bounds of Generalized Proportional Fractional Integrals in General Form via Convex Functions and Their Applications. Mathematics 2020, 8, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010113

AMA Style

Rahman G, Abdeljawad T, Jarad F, Nisar KS. Bounds of Generalized Proportional Fractional Integrals in General Form via Convex Functions and Their Applications. Mathematics. 2020; 8(1):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahman, Gauhar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Fahd Jarad, and Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar. 2020. "Bounds of Generalized Proportional Fractional Integrals in General Form via Convex Functions and Their Applications" Mathematics 8, no. 1: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010113

APA Style

Rahman, G., Abdeljawad, T., Jarad, F., & Nisar, K. S. (2020). Bounds of Generalized Proportional Fractional Integrals in General Form via Convex Functions and Their Applications. Mathematics, 8(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010113

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop