Next Article in Journal
Completed Suicide Linked to the COVID-19 Pandemic by Using the Psychological Autopsy Method in Sibiu County, Romania: Case Series and Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Is There a Correlation between Gingival Display and Incisal Inclination in a Gummy Smile? Study on Cephalometric Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
The Health Belief Model Modifying Factors Associated with Missed Clinic Appointments among Individuals with Sickle Cell Disease in the Jazan Province, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Periodontitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Involving Maxillary Sinus Measured by Lund Mackay Staging System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Edentulism in a Sample of Mexican Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes

by
Rosalina Islas-Zarazúa
1,
Mariana Mora-Acosta
1,*,
José de Jesús Navarrete-Hernández
1,
Josefina Reynoso-Vázquez
2,
Juan José Villalobos-Rodelo
3,4,
Laura Rojas-Ortega
5,
Taurino Amilcar Sosa-Velazco
6,
María de Lourdes Márquez-Corona
1,
Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís
1,7,* and
Gerardo Maupomé
8,9
1
Dentistry Academic Area, Health Sciences Institute, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Pachuca 42160, Mexico
2
Pharmacy Academic Area, Health Sciences Institute, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Pachuca 42160, Mexico
3
School of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80040, Mexico
4
Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Security and Services for Government Workers, Culiacan 80000, Mexico
5
Universidad Contemporánea de las Américas, Ciudad de Mexico 04890, Mexico
6
School of Dentistry, Autonomous University “Benito Juarez” of Oaxaca, Oaxaca de Juárez 68120, Mexico
7
Advanced Studies and Research Center in Dentistry “Dr. Keisaburo Miyata”, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University of State of Mexico, Toluca 50000, Mexico
8
Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University/Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
9
Indiana University Network Science Institute, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(12), 2378; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122378
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 26 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Dentistry, Oral Health and Maxillofacial Surgery)

Abstract

:
The objective of the present study was to compare the prevalence of edentulism in Mexican adults with and without a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when they are seeking dental care. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1921 medical records of Mexican adults 40 years of age and older who sought dental care at clinics of a public university in Mexico. The dependent variable was edentulism, clinically determined through an oral examination. The main independent variable was the self-report of previous T2DM diagnosis made by a physician. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic and behavioral covariates were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. Overall edentulism prevalence was 8.4% (95% CI = 7.1–9.6). The prevalence of T2DM was 14.3% (n = 274). The prevalence of edentulism among individuals with T2DM was 13.1%, but only 7.6% among individuals without T2DM. In the multivariate binary logistic regression model, a previous T2DM diagnosis increased the probability of being edentulous 1.61 times (95% CI = 1.03–2.50). For each year a person’s age increased, the likelihood of being edentulous increased by 12% (95% CI = 10–14%). In summary, a higher prevalence of edentulism was present in Mexican adults with T2DM and in those of older age. This information may be used by dental care providers and health policymakers to improve approaches to preventive care, as well as to characterize and anticipate care needs more accurately for the adult and older adult populations.

1. Introduction

Due to the high prevalence and incidence of oral diseases, the total number of individuals they affect, and their economic impact on families and on health systems, they are considered public health problems [1,2]. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that poor oral health is a major health challenge around the world; it has been poorly addressed in general. Globally, there were 3.5 billion cases of oral conditions: 2.3 billion had untreated caries in permanent teeth, 796 million had severe periodontitis, 532 million had untreated caries in primary teeth, 267 million had complete tooth loss, and 139 million had other oral conditions in 2017 [3]. There is conflicting evidence about trends and mechanisms leading to increasing and decreasing edentulism rates. Edentulism is generally declining in developed countries, but generally increasing in developing countries. Because of aging and the increasing number of older adults reaching old age, edentulism continues to grow [4]. A recent meta-analysis focused on 45-year-olds and older reported a range of prevalence figures between 1.1% and 70%, with a combined 22.0% prevalence worldwide [5]. According to a national survey in Mexico, approximately 10% of adults between 45 and 54 years old, 25% between 65 and 74 years old, and 30% 65 and older, are edentulous [6]. Documenting trends in tooth loss may help in planning dental care services and workforce needs [7]. Edentulism connotes a disability condition that reflects a personal history of severe oral disease and access to dental services throughout life [7,8]; such history is primarily driven by caries and periodontitis [9,10,11]. Tooth loss and edentulism negatively impact people’s nutritional intake. People with more severe tooth loss may consume significantly fewer basic nutrients from fruits and vegetables, dietary fiber, and protein, compared to those without severe tooth loss [8,12,13,14]. Evidence from observational studies showed that tooth loss and edentulism may be associated with multiple adverse health effects [15].
The most prevalent chronic diseases share some modifiable risk factors with oral diseases and, therefore, may occur in the same patients [2,16,17,18,19]. In addition, people with chronic diseases are more likely to have untreated dental disease and periodontitis, which may lead to tooth loss [2,20,21,22,23,24]. Oral diseases and diabetes mellitus are an example of such overlap [25,26,27,28]. There are three types of diabetes: type 1, type 2, and gestational [29]. T1DM may occur at any age but tends to strike earlier in life. T2DM is more common in adults and accounts for 90% of all diabetes cases. T2DM is characterized by elevated blood glucose resulting from insufficient insulin production, inadequate effect of existing insulin, or both [29,30]. Mexico is a country with some of the highest diabetes prevalence rates in the world [31]; survey data have shown their continuous increase [32]. It is estimated that by 2030 the prevalence will reach 12–18% and, by 2050, 14–22% [33]. Under such a scenario, it would be reasonable to expect that edentulism would increase accordingly; that situation calls for greater attention by the health care and the health promotion systems to address potential additional impacts.
The bidirectional link between diabetes and periodontitis has been well established: through various mechanisms, diabetes promotes the destruction of periodontal tissues and periodontal disease negatively affects glycemic control [34]. The prevalence of edentulism in patients with T2DM is associated with oral problems such as salivary gland hypofunction, periodontitis, root caries, and pulpal involvement after severe carious lesions, as well as being associated with general health factors such as depression, cognitive impairment, and pain [35,36]. With T2DM increasing worldwide, it is reasonable to expect an increase in dental care needs [36]. Because the association between edentulism and T2DM has been reported to hold diverse directions and/or strengths [2,37,38], it is plausible that such association is context-specific [35]. We sought to expand the knowledge base. The aim of the present study was to compare the prevalence of edentulism in Mexican adults with and without a diagnosis of T2DM when they seek dental care. The hypothesis was that a group of people with T2DM would have a higher percentage of edentulism, compared to those without.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Location

This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study in a random sample of medical records of adult patients. They were seeking dental care at the clinics of the Dentistry Academic Area of the Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo. The original sample was of individuals over 17 years of age; but for the present sub-analysis, we only included those 40 years of age and older. The methodology has been previously published [39,40]. For the calculation of the sample size in the original study, the following parameters were used: the universe was 16,500 medical records, the heterogeneity (diversity) was 50%, the margin of error was 2%, a confidence level of 99%, and a 5% loss, so a sample of 3481 medical records was obtained. For the present analysis, the inclusion criteria were medical records of individuals of: (1) any sex, (2) 40 years of age or older, (3) subjects who were seeking dental care at the university clinics. The exclusion criteria were: (1) incomplete medical records, (2) medical records absent at the time of the study, (3) medical records of patients diagnosed with T1DM. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, the final sample for the analysis of the present study was 1921. The power in the present study was 0.80 to detect significant differences (alpha = 0.05) between this sample and the observed proportions.

2.2. Study Variables

The medical/dental records accruing data for the present study were collected by senior dental students. They were trained and standardized in the criteria used.
The dependent variable was edentulism, which was coded as 0 = patient without edentulism and 1 = patient with edentulism. The main independent variable was the self-report of having received a T2DM diagnosis by a physician, which was dichotomized as 0 = no, 1 = yes. Other covariates were: age (40 to 95 years old, as a continuous variable); sex (0 = female, 1 = male); type of housing (0 = good, 1 = fair, 2 = poor); marital status (0 = with partner, 1 = without partner); health insurance (0 = none, 1= any insurance, private or public); reason for dental care (0 = preventive, 1 = curative/rehabilitation); and high blood pressure (0 = no, 1 = yes). Socioeconomic position (SEP) (measured through occupation as: 0 = low SEP, 1 = medium, 2 = high, together with type of housing). Occupation was derived from the National Occupational Classification System and subsequently categorized into levels 0 = low, 1 = medium and 2 = high [41].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

A univariate analysis was performed: measures of central tendency and dispersion are reported for the continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for the categorical variables.
A binary logistic regression model was used for the bivariate and multivariate analyses. The strength of the association between the dependent variable (edentulism) and the independent variables was expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The variance inflation factor (VIF) test was performed to analyze and, if necessary, avoid multicollinearity between the independent variables. For the construction of the model, those variables that in the bivariate analysis showed a value of p < 0.25 were taken into account. The overall fit of the model was performed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [42]. The Stata statistical software package (version 14) was used for all analyses (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX, USA).

2.4. Ethical Statement

The research and ethical guidelines of the Helsinki principles were followed to conduct this study. The study included identified medical/dental records whose patients had consented to the use of clinical information for research as long as data privacy was guaranteed. The project was approved by the ethics and research committee of the Institute of Health Sciences of the Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo (CEEI-000037-2019).

3. Results

A total of 1921 individuals were included in the present study. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 53.9 ± 10.8. Most were women (64.4%). Most had a partner (62.3%). Regarding socioeconomic factors, the majority (85.0%) were classified as having a “low” level occupation but with “good” housing characteristics. Almost all (93.2%) of the individuals had access to health insurance, either public or private; 69.8% sought dental curative treatment or rehabilitation at the clinic, and almost 60% had a diagnosis of high blood pressure. A previous diagnosis of T2DM was found in 14.3% (95% CI = 12.7–15.8) of records. The prevalence of edentulism was 8.4% (95% CI = 7.1–9.6).
Table 2 presents the results of the bivariate analyses. The prevalence of edentulism among individuals with T2DM was 13.1% and 7.6% among individuals without (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.10–1.14, p = 0.002). The mean age was higher among individuals with edentulism (68.3 ± 10.8 years) compared with individuals without edentulism (52.6 ± 9.8): (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.10–1.14). Individuals without a partner were 1.66 (95% CI = 1.20–2.29) times as likely to be edentulous than individuals with a partner.
The multivariate binary logistic regression model is presented in Table 3; it was observed that a previous diagnosis of T2DM increased the chance of being edentulous by 61% (95% CI = 1.03–2.50). For each year’s increase in age, the likelihood of being edentulous increased by 12% (95% CI = 10–14%).

4. Discussion

The aim of the present study was to compare the prevalence of complete tooth loss between two groups of Mexican adults, one with a diagnosis of T2DM and the other without such a diagnosis. The results showed that in the group with T2DM the prevalence of edentulism was higher than in the group without T2DM. The overall prevalence of edentulism was 8.4%, resembling results in populations of similar age. In a previous study conducted in 20 states of Mexico (out of 32 total) [37], a 10.2% prevalence of edentulism was observed in individuals ages 35 years and older, with variations among states ranging from 5.0% to 16.7%. Although the prevalence of edentulism has decreased in several countries, in Mexico it is estimated that 6.3% (N = 3,437,816) of the population ages 18 years and older are edentulous [6]. In a multi-country study, the overall prevalence of edentulism was 11.7% [38], with India, Mexico, and Russia having the highest prevalence (16.3% to 21.7%), and with China, Ghana, and South Africa (3.0% to 9.0%) having the lowest. In individuals older than 30 years in Iran, prevalence between 3.0% and 78.0% has been reported [43]. These wide ranges can be explained by multiple factors, such as the characteristics of each country studied, the distribution of socioeconomic groups within these countries, the response of the health systems to the oral health needs of the population, the actual access to relevant health services, the age groups included, or the methodology used to collect data (clinical or self-reported). Direct comparisons between our results and those of other studies may only allow partial conclusions to be drawn. However, it is important to emphasize that quantifying edentulism prevalence in adults is a valuable indicator of treatment needs—felt, normative, and met. These evaluations help estimate the proportion of the population that is expected to use dental services in the future, thus providing essential information for dental service planning and human resource training.
Oral diseases such as caries [44,45,46,47,48] and periodontal diseases [49,50,51,52,53] are considered public health problems in Mexico due to their high prevalence and incidence, as well as the ensuing high treatment needs. Mexico is one of the countries with the highest prevalence and incidence of T2DM [31,32]. This combination does not foretell the best outcomes for oral health, and it is likely/will likely be associated with a high edentulism experience [2,20,21,24]. In the present study, T2DM was a risk factor for edentulism as reported in other studies [8,9,21,34,36]. In recent years, the connection between oral health and systemic health has been widely recognized by the dental and medical professions. Studies have been conducted revealing that oral health affects systemic health and vice versa, subject to the influence of inflammatory mechanisms [8], with molecular and immunological bases [22]. These diseases/conditions share common risk factors, so comprehensive promotion of general health and oral health focused on addressing unhealthy behaviors has the potential to reduce both dental disease rates, as well as mortality rates attributed to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and T2DM [19]. Both families and the health care system in Mexico may be negatively affected because of the high cost of addressing T2DM and edentulism.
The present study confirmed that older age was associated with edentulism, as previously reported [8,20,21,36]. Tooth loss is considered an accurate marker of the population’s oral health and is therefore monitored in many countries. Edentulism reflects not only dental disease but also the attitudes of patients and dentists, the dentist-patient relationship, the availability and accessibility of dental services, and the prevailing philosophies of dental care [7]. Self-care, as behaviors that each individual must deliberately apply in order to maintain good health, may be an ideal component of the approach to ameliorate the impact of risk factors (modifiable and non-modifiable) [54].
The present study has certain limitations. The first is the cross-sectional design and its temporal ambiguity; by measuring cause and effect at the same time, causal relationships beyond statistical associations cannot be established. Another possible source of bias may be the self-reported data of T2DM, although self-reported health data are known to be valid and reliable in many cases; there is no obvious reason for patients to conceal their T2DM when reporting medical history features. We were circumscribed to analyzing data collected from medical/dental histories derived from a real-life dental education environment; although procedures undertaken by senior students were highly standardized and scrutinized, data quality is of necessity not as good as in research studies.

5. Conclusions

In this sample of Mexican adults ages 40 years and older, edentulism prevalence was 8.4%. A higher prevalence was observed among individuals with T2DM. Age was also associated with edentulism. This information is useful for dental care providers and health policymakers to improve approaches to preventive care, as well as to be able to characterize more accurately the care needs of the adult and older adult population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.I.-Z., M.M.-A., J.d.J.N.-H., J.R.-V., J.J.V.-R., L.R.-O., T.A.S.-V., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Data curation, J.R.-V. and C.E.M.-S.; Formal analysis, R.I.-Z., M.M.-A., J.d.J.N.-H., J.J.V.-R., L.R.-O., T.A.S.-V., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Investigation, J.d.J.N.-H., J.J.V.-R., M.d.L.M.-C. and C.E.M.-S.; Methodology, R.I.-Z., M.M.-A., J.R.-V., L.R.-O., T.A.S.-V., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Project administration, M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Software, C.E.M.-S.; Supervision, M.d.L.M.-C. and C.E.M.-S.; Validation, R.I.-Z., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Writing—original draft, R.I.-Z., M.M.-A., J.d.J.N.-H., J.R.-V., J.J.V.-R., L.R.-O., T.A.S.-V., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M.; Writing—review and editing, R.I.-Z., M.M.-A., J.d.J.N.-H., J.R.-V., J.J.V.-R., L.R.-O., T.A.S.-V., M.d.L.M.-C., C.E.M.-S. and G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo (CEEI-000037-2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Given that medical records were involved, written informed consent was not required.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acuña-González, G.R.; Casanova-Sarmiento, J.A.; Islas-Granillo, H.; Márquez-Rodríguez, S.; Benítez-Valladares, D.; Mendoza-Rodríguez, M.; de la Rosa-Santillana, R.; Navarrete-Hernández, J.J.; Medina-Solís, C.E.; Maupomé, G. Socioeconomic Inequalities and Toothbrushing Frequency among Schoolchildren Aged 6 to 12 Years in a Multi-Site Study of Mexican Cities: A Cross-Sectional Study. Children 2022, 9, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Casanova-Rosado, A.J.; Casanova-Rosado, J.F.; Minaya-Sánchez, M.; Robles-Minaya, J.L.; Casanova-Sarmiento, J.A.; Márquez-Corona, M.L.; Pontigo-Loyola, A.P.; Isla-Granillo, H.; Mora-Acosta, M.; Márquez-Rodríguez, S.; et al. Association of Edentulism with Various Chronic Diseases in Mexican Elders 60+ Years: Results of a Population-Based Survey. Healthcare 2021, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. GBD 2017 Oral Disorders Collaborators; Bernabe, E.; Marcenes, W.; Hernandez, C.R.; Bailey, J.; Abreu, L.G.; Alipour, V.; Amini, S.; Arabloo, J.; Arefi, Z.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Al-Rafee, M.A. The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: A literature Review. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 1841–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borg-Bartolo, R.; Roccuzzo, A.; Molinero-Mourelle, P.; Schimmel, M.; Gambetta-Tessini, K.; Chaurasia, A.; Koca-Ünsal, R.B.; Tennert, C.; Giacaman, R.; Campus, G. Global prevalence of edentulism and dental caries in middle-aged and elderly persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2022, 127, 104335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Medina-Solís, C.E.; Pérez-Núñez, R.; Maupomé, G.; Avila-Burgos, L.; Pontigo-Loyola, A.P.; Patiño-Marín, N.; Villalobos-Rodelo, J.J. National survey on edentulism and its geographic distribution, among Mexicans 18 years of age and older (with emphasis in WHO age groups). J. Oral Rehabil. 2008, 35, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kassebaum, N.J.; Bernabé, E.; Dahiya, M.; Bhandari, B.; Murray, C.J.; Marcenes, W. Global Burden of Severe Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93 (Suppl. S7), 20S–28S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Leveille, S.G.; Shi, L. Multiple Chronic Diseases Associated with Tooth Loss among the US Adult Population. Front. Big Data 2022, 5, 932618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suzuki, S.; Sugihara, N.; Kamijo, H.; Morita, M.; Kawato, T.; Tsuneishi, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Hasuike, Y.; Sato, T. Reasons for Tooth Extractions in Japan: The Second Nationwide Survey. Int. Dent. J. 2022, 72, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aljafar, A.; Alibrahim, H.; Alahmed, A.; AbuAli, A.; Nazir, M.; Alakel, A.; Almas, K. Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extractions and Related Factors among Adult Patients in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 5534455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramos, Y.; Campos, A.; Sosa, L.; Padrón, K.; Sánchez, N.; González, A.; Izarra, E. Efectos de la melatonina sobre los niveles creviculares de óxido nítrico en pacientes con periodontitis. Acta Bioclínica 2021, 11, 183–203. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huraib, W.M.; Al-Ghalib, T.A.; Niyazi, A.A.T.; Bamigdad, M.S. Assessment of Nutritional and Psychosocial Status of Elderly Patients Wearing Removable Dental Prosthetics. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2022, 14 (Suppl. S1), S429–S432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moynihan, P.; Varghese, R. Eating Advice for People Who Wear Dentures: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cascaes, A.M.; Constante, H.M.; Vaz, J.D.S.; Ferreira de Mello, A.L.S.; Bomfim, R.A. Tooth loss severity and core and non-core food consumption among older Brazilian adults. Gerodontology 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venkat, M.; Janakiram, C.; Ramanarayanan, V. Prevalence of Tooth Mortality among Adults in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2021, 12, 339–345. [Google Scholar]
  16. Puzhankara, L.; Janakiram, C. Assessment of Common Risk Factors of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) and Periodontal Disease in Indian Adults: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study. Methods Protoc. 2022, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Szerszeń, M.; Górski, B.; Kowalski, J. Clinical Condition of the Oral Cavity in the Adult Polish Population below 70 Years of Age after Myocardial Infarction-A Case-Control Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Puzhankara, L.; Janakiram, C. Common Risk Factor Approach to Limit Noncommunicable Diseases and Periodontal Disease-The Molecular and Cellular Basis: A Narrative Review. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2021, 11, 490–502. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolf, T.G.; Cagetti, M.G.; Fisher, J.M.; Seeberger, G.K.; Campus, G. Non-communicable Diseases and Oral Health: An Overview. Front. Oral Health 2021, 2, 725460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Parker, M.L.; Thornton-Evans, G.; Wei, L.; Griffin, S.O. Prevalence of and Changes in Tooth Loss among Adults Aged ≥50 Years with Selected Chronic Conditions—United States, 1999–2004 and 2011–2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patel, M.H.; Kumar, J.V.; Moss, M.E. Diabetes and tooth loss: An analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2004. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2013, 144, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dörfer, C.; Benz, C.; Aida, J.; Campard, G. The relationship of oral health with general health and NCDs: A brief review. Int. Dent. J. 2017, 67 (Suppl. S2), 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Petersen, P.E.; Ogawa, H. The global burden of periodontal disease: Towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000 2012, 60, 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dwibedi, N.; Wiener, R.C.; Findley, P.A.; Shen, C.; Sambamoorthi, U. Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tooth loss, and edentulism among adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2020, 151, 735–744.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Borgnakke, W.S.; Poudel, P. Diabetes and Oral Health: Summary of Current Scientific Evidence for Why Transdisciplinary Collaboration Is Needed. Front. Dent. Med. 2021, 2, 709831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Balkaran, R.L.; Teelucksingh, S.S.; Naidu, R.S.; Lutchmansingh, K.E.; Morris, L.A.; Tripathi, V.; Teelucksingh, S. The Use of the Slipping Slipper Sign to Explore the Connection between the Feet and the Mouth in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. P R Health Sci. J. 2020, 39, 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  27. Canga, M.; Malagnino, I.; Qafmolla, A.; Xhajanka, E.; Malagnino, V.A. The impact of the diabetes on oral health—An observational study. Wiad Lek. 2022, 75, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. AlDukhail, S.; Alhazmi, H.; Riedy, C.; Barrow, J.R.; Chamut, S. Oral health outcomes among adults with diabetes served at HRSA-funded health centers. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2021, 35, 107979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. International Diabetes Federation. What Is Diabetes. 2019. Available online: https://www.idf.org/aboutdiabetes/what-is-diabetes.html (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  30. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, S15–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B.B.; Stein, C.; Basit, A.; Chan, J.C.N.; Mbanya, J.C.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 183, 109119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Basto-Abreu, A.C.; López-Olmedo, N.; Rojas-Martínez, R.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; De la Cruz-Góngora, V.V.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Romero-Martínez, M.; Barquera, S.; Villalpando, S.; et al. Prevalence of diabetes and glycemic control in Mexico: National results from 2018 and 2020. Salud Publica Mex. 2021, 63, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meza, R.; Barrientos-Gutiérrez, T.; Rojas-Martínez, R.; Reynoso-Noverón, N.; Palacio-Mejía, L.S.; Lazcano-Ponce, E.; Hernández-Ávila, M. Burden of type 2 diabetes in Mexico: Past, current and future prevalence and incidence rates. Prev. Med. 2015, 81, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Santonocito, S.; Polizzi, A.; Marchetti, E.; Dalessandri, D.; Migliorati, M.; Lupi, S.M.; Cicciù, M.; Isola, G. Impact of Periodontitis on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Status in Diabetes Patients: Current Knowledge on Early Disease Markers and Therapeutic Perspectives. Mediat. Inflamm. 2022, 2022, 4955277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jacob, L.; Shin, J.I.; Oh, H.; López-Sánchez, G.F.; Smith, L.; Haro, J.M.; Koyanagi, A. Association between diabetes and edentulism and their joint effects on health status in 40 low and middle-income countries. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, e002514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andrade, C.A.S.; Paz, J.L.C.; de Melo, G.S.; Mahrouseh, N.; Januário, A.L.; Capeletti, L.R. Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 1797–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Medina-Solis, C.E.; Pérez-Núñez, R.; Maupomé, G.; Casanova-Rosado, J.F. Edentulism among Mexicans 35 years old and older, and associated factors. Am. J. Public Health 2006, 96, 1578–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Peltzer, K.; Hewlett, S.; Yawson, A.E.; Moynihan, P.; Preet, R.; Wu, F.; Guo, G.; Arokiasamy, P.; Snodgrass, J.J.; Chatterji, S.; et al. Prevalence of loss of all teeth (edentulism) and associated factors in older adults in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 11308–11324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. López-Gómez, S.A.; González-López, B.S.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Pontigo-Loyola, A.P.; Márquez-Corona, M.L.; Villalobos-Rodelo, J.J.; Rueda-Ibarra, V.; Medina-Solís, C.E. Tooth loss in patients with and without diabetes: A large-scale, cross-sectional study of Mexican adults. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2020, 151, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. López-Gómez, S.A.; González-López, B.S.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Márquez-Corona, M.L.; Minaya-Sánchez, M.; Navarrete-Hernández, J.J. Factors Associated with Self-Report of Diabetes in Adults Seeking Dental Care from a Developing Country; Working paper; Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México: Toluca, Mexico, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  41. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Mexico). National Occupational Classification System 2011: SINCO/Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; INEGI: Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico, 2011.
  42. Bagley, S.C.; White, H.; Golomb, B.A. Logistic regression in the medical literature: Standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001, 54, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shayegh, S.S.; Ebrahimi, S.; Hakimaneh, S.M.R.; Eisaei, M. Prevalence of Complete Edentulism in Individuals at Least 30 Years Old in Iran since 2000: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2021, 12, 72. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lucas-Rincón, S.E.; Lara-Carrillo, E.; Robles-Bermeo, N.L.; Rueda-Ibarra, V.; Alonso-Sánchez, C.C.; Vázquez-Rodríguez, S.B.; Ávila-Burgos, L.; Medina-Solis, C.E.; Maupomé, G. Experience, prevalence, need for treatment and cost of care for caries: A multicenter study in a developing country. Community Dent Health 2022, 39, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Lara, J.S.; Romano, A.; Murisi, P.U.; Tedesco, T.K.; Mendes, F.M.; Soto-Rojas, A.E.; Alonso, C.; Campus, G. Impact of early childhood caries severity on oral health-related quality of life among preschool children in Mexico: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2022, 32, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Villalobos-Rodelo, J.J.; Mendoza-Rodríguez, M.; Islas-Zarazúa, R.; Márquez-Rodríguez, S.; Mora-Acosta, M.; Pontigo-Loyola, A.P.; Márquez-Corona, M.L.; Medina-Solís, C.E.; Maupomé, G. Experience and Prevalence of Dental Caries in 6 to 12-Year-Old School Children in an Agricultural Community: A Cross-Sectional Study. Children 2021, 8, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. García-Pérez, A.; González-Aragón Pineda, A.E.; Rosales-Ibáñez, R.; Rodríguez-Chávez, J.A.; Cuevas-González, J.C.; Pérez-Pérez, N.G.; Villanueva-Gutiérrez, T. Association between sociodemographic factors and noncavitated and cavitated caries lesions in 8- to 12-year-old Mexican schoolchildren. Medicine 2021, 100, e26435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Casanova-Rosado, J.F.; Casanova-Rosado, A.J.; Minaya-Sánchez, M.; Casanova-Sarmiento, J.A.; Robles-Minaya, J.L.; Márquez-Rodríguez, S.; Mora-Acosta, M.; Islas-Zarazúa, R.; Márquez-Corona, M.L.; Ávila-Burgos, L.; et al. Self-Reported Dental Caries by Mexican Elementary and Middle-School Schoolchildren in the Context of Socioeconomic Indicators: A National Ecological Study. Children 2021, 8, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guardado-Luevanos, I.; Bologna-Molina, R.; Zepeda-Nuño, J.S.; Isiordia-Espinoza, M.; Molina-Frechero, N.; González-González, R.; Pérez-Pérez, M.; López-Verdín, S. Self-Reported Periodontal Disease and Its Association with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. García-Parra, M.I.; Jiménez-Coello, M.; Carrillo-Ávila, B.A.; Hernández-Cortázar, I.; Chávez-Cortez, G.; Martínez-Aguilar, V.M. Quantification of Osteoprotegerin Plasma Levels in Patients with Periodontitis. P R Health Sci. J. 2022, 41, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rodríguez-Franco, N.I.; Moral de la Rubia, J.; Alcázar-Pizaña, A.G. Predictive Model of Clinical Attachment Loss and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life through Depressive Symptomatology, Oral Hygiene Habits, and Proinflammatory Biomarkers: A Pilot Study. Dent. J. 2020, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. García-Pérez, Á.; Borges-Yáñez, S.A.; Jiménez-Corona, A.; Jiménez-Corona, M.E.; Ponce-de-León, S. Self-report of gingival problems and periodontitis in indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Chiapas, Mexico. Int. Dent. J. 2016, 66, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Irigoyen-Camacho, M.E.; Sanchez-Perez, L.; Molina-Frechero, N.; Velazquez-Alva, C.; Zepeda-Zepeda, M.; Borges-Yanez, A. The relationship between body mass index and body fat percentage and periodontal status in Mexican adolescents. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2014, 72, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. del Valle-Herrera-Pineda, I.; Garcés-Maggi, B.L.; Monserrate, J.; Suárez-Lindao, B.G. El autocuidado en diabetes mellitus tipo 2: Interpretación de la variable sedentarismo. Comunidad y Salud 2021, 19, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Descriptive analysis of the study sample of Mexican adults aged 40 years and older.
Table 1. Descriptive analysis of the study sample of Mexican adults aged 40 years and older.
VariablesMean ± SD
Age53.91 ± 10.84
n (%)
T2DM
No
Yes
1647 (85.7)
274 (14.3)
Sex
Female
Male
1237 (64.4)
684 (35.6)
Marital status
With partner
Without partner
1196 (62.3)
725 (37.7)
Occupation
Low
Medium
High
1633 (85.0%)
159 (8.3)
129 (6.7)
Housing
Poor
Fair
Good
30 (1.6)
662 (35.5)
1229 (63.9)
Health insurance
None
Some insurance
130 (6.8)
1791 (93.2)
Reason for consultation
Preventive
Curative/rehabilitation
580 (30.2)
1341 (69.8)
High blood pressure
No
Yes
782 (40.7)
1139 (59.3)
SD: Standard Deviation.
Table 2. Bivariate analyses of the prevalence of edentulism across the independent variables included in the study.
Table 2. Bivariate analyses of the prevalence of edentulism across the independent variables included in the study.
VariablesWithout EdentulismWith EdentulismOR (95% CI)p-Value
T2DM
No
Yes
1522 (92.4)
238 (86.9)
125 (7.6)
36 (13.1)
1 *
1.84 (1.24–2.73)
0.002
Age52.59 ± 9.8468.33 ± 10.851.12 (1.10–1.14)<0.001
Sex
Female
Male
1140 (92.2)
620 (90.6)
97 (7.8)
64 (9.4)
1 *
1.21 (0.87–1.68)
0.252
Marital status
With partner
Without partner
1114 (93.1)
646 (89.1)
82 (6.9)
79 (10.9)
1 *
1.66 (1.20–2.29)
0.002
Occupation
Low
Medium
High
1504 (92.1)
137 (86.2)
119 (92.2)
129 (7.9)
22 (13.8)
10 (7.8)
1.02 (0.52–1.99)
1.91 (0.87–4.19)
1 *
0.952
0.107
Housing
Poor
Fair
Good
26 (86.7)
611 (92.3)
1123 (91.4)
4 (13.3)
51 (7.7)
106 (8.6)
1.62 (0.55–4.75)
0.88 (0.62–1.52)
1 *
0.371
0.489
Health insurance
None
Some insurance
122 (93.8)
1638 (91.5)
8 (6.2)
153 (8.5)
1 *
1.42 (0.68–2.96)
0.345
Reason for consultation
Preventive
Curative/rehabilitation
541 (93.3)
1219 (90.9)
39 (6.7)
122 (9.1)
1 *
1.38 (0.95–2.01)
0.085
High Blood Pressure
No
Yes
719 (91.9)
1041 (91.4)
63 (8.1)
98 (8.6)
1 *
1.07 (0.77–1.49)
0.670
* Reference category.
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression model between edentulism and the independent variables.
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression model between edentulism and the independent variables.
VariableOR (95% CI)p-Value
Age1.12 (1.10−1.14)<0.001
T2DM
No
Yes
1 *
1.61 (1.03−2.50)
0.034
Hosmer-Lemeshow chi2 (8) = 13.06, p = 0.1097. Note: Estimates adjusted for the variables contained in the table, in addition to sex, marital status, and reason for consultation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islas-Zarazúa, R.; Mora-Acosta, M.; Navarrete-Hernández, J.d.J.; Reynoso-Vázquez, J.; Villalobos-Rodelo, J.J.; Rojas-Ortega, L.; Sosa-Velazco, T.A.; Márquez-Corona, M.d.L.; Medina-Solís, C.E.; Maupomé, G. Comparative Analysis of Edentulism in a Sample of Mexican Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122378

AMA Style

Islas-Zarazúa R, Mora-Acosta M, Navarrete-Hernández JdJ, Reynoso-Vázquez J, Villalobos-Rodelo JJ, Rojas-Ortega L, Sosa-Velazco TA, Márquez-Corona MdL, Medina-Solís CE, Maupomé G. Comparative Analysis of Edentulism in a Sample of Mexican Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes. Healthcare. 2022; 10(12):2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islas-Zarazúa, Rosalina, Mariana Mora-Acosta, José de Jesús Navarrete-Hernández, Josefina Reynoso-Vázquez, Juan José Villalobos-Rodelo, Laura Rojas-Ortega, Taurino Amilcar Sosa-Velazco, María de Lourdes Márquez-Corona, Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís, and Gerardo Maupomé. 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Edentulism in a Sample of Mexican Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes" Healthcare 10, no. 12: 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122378

APA Style

Islas-Zarazúa, R., Mora-Acosta, M., Navarrete-Hernández, J. d. J., Reynoso-Vázquez, J., Villalobos-Rodelo, J. J., Rojas-Ortega, L., Sosa-Velazco, T. A., Márquez-Corona, M. d. L., Medina-Solís, C. E., & Maupomé, G. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Edentulism in a Sample of Mexican Adults with and without Type 2 Diabetes. Healthcare, 10(12), 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop