Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases
by
, , ,
Yoshiteru Akezaki
1
,
Eiji Nakata
2,*,
Masato Kikuuchi
3,
Shinsuke Sugihara
3,
Yoshimi Katayama
4,
Haruyoshi Katayama
2,
Masanori Hamada
4 and
Toshifumi Ozaki
2 1
Division of Physical Therapy, Kochi Professional University of Rehabilitation, Tosa 781-1102, Kochi, Japan
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Okayama, Japan
3
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama 791-0280, Ehime, Japan
4
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Okayama, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(2), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020350
Submission received: 20 January 2022
/
Revised: 7 February 2022
/
Accepted: 8 February 2022
/
Published: 11 February 2022
Abstract
:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between overall survival (OS) and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with skeletal-related events. In this study, 265 patients whose clinical parameters were available before radiotherapy were investigated. Methods: Age, sex, ADL, pain, the primary site, spinal level of bone metastases, spinal instability, treatment strategy, including chemotherapy or palliative treatment, and OS were investigated. ADL patients with a Barthel index of ≥90 were classified as the high ADL group, while those with a score < 90 were classified as the low ADL group. For OS, patients surviving ≥160 days were classified as the non-poor prognosis group, and those who survived <160 days were classified as the poor prognosis group. Results: Age, sex, ADL, pain, the primary site, and treatment strategy for OS were different between the two groups (p < 0.1). Logistic regression analysis revealed that ADL, the primary site, and treatment strategy were significant predictors of OS (p < 0.05). High ADL, breast cancer, and chemotherapy had a positive effect on OS. Conclusions: It is suggested that improvements may be obtained by performing rehabilitation interventions to maintain and improve ADL, by constructing a system for monitoring spinal bone metastases with images before ADL decreases, and by performing interventions such as changes in treatment methods such as RT or surgery at appropriate times.
1. Introduction
Approximately one-third of all cancer patients develop bone metastases; breast, prostate, and lung cancer cases account for approximately 80% of all bone metastases [1]. Approximately 70% of patients present metastases involving the vertebral column, commonly at the thoracic and lumbar levels [2]. Bone metastases involve serious complications leading to skeletal-related events (SREs), including bone pain, requiring radiotherapy, pathologic fractures, and spinal cord compression [3,4].
Treatments involve chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), surgery, and/or percutaneous procedures (such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty) [5]. Radiotherapy is the most common treatment option for bone metastases [6,7,8], effective in reducing symptoms and increasing subjective well-being with minimal side effects [9].
The primary tumor site, good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) scale, good Karnofsky Performance Scale, absence of previous chemotherapy and visceral metastasis, single bone metastasis, younger age, and no hypercalcemia were associated with good survival in spinal bone metastases [10,11,12]. However, few reports have examined the role of activities of daily living (ADL) in overall survival (OS) in patients with SREs. Evaluating the factors influencing the prognosis of metastatic spinal disease is essential for providing medical care.
This study aimed to investigate the association between OS and ADL in patients with SREs.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design
This retrospective observational study was conducted to investigate OS in patients with spinal bone metastases.
2.2. Patients
All patients 18 years and older were included that presented with an SRE and underwent radiotherapy for their SREs at our single tertiary institution in Japan between 2012 and 2016. SRE was defined as bone metastases producing signs and symptoms, such as vertebral bone fracture, painful spinal bone metastases, and spinal cord compression. RT was defined as being performed on spinal bone metastases. Exclusion criteria were: (1) patients that underwent surgery for their SREs; (2) patients in whom there was difficulty assessing the clinical parameters before RT (Figure 1).
Patients performed muscle strengthening, balance, and ADL exercises from the early stage based on their conditions.
2.3. Clinical Parameters
Clinical parameters, including age, sex, comorbidities, ADL, pain, the primary site, brain or visceral metastases, bone metastases other than the spine, spinal level of bone metastases, spinal instability, treatment strategy (chemotherapy or palliative treatment), and OS of all patients were investigated.
2.4. Measurement of ADL
The Barthel index is a measure of the ability to perform ADL on a scale of 0–100 (0, very dependent; 100, independent) [13]. The Barthel index assesses the patient’s ability to perform feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel and bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation, and stair climbing. The Barthel index was measured by a physical therapist or occupational therapist. The criteria for functional impairment were scores < 90 [14,15]. Patients with a Barthel index of ≥90 were classified as the high ADL group, while those with scores < 90 were classified as the low ADL group. Measurements were estimated before RT.
2.5. Measurement of Pain
Pain in this study was limited to spinal metastasis-related pain and assessed using a numerical rating scale with 0 representing “no pain” and 10 representing “pain as bad as you can imagine.” Pain was evaluated during motion. Measurements were taken before RT.
2.6. The Primary Site and Spinal Level of Bone Metastases
Breast cancer has a more favorable prognosis than other solid tumors [16]. The primary site was classified into breast and other cancer groups.
Regarding the spinal level of bone metastases, patients with bone metastases in the cervical and thoracic vertebrae were classified as the cervical and thoracic vertebrae group, while patients with bone metastases in lumbar vertebrae were classified as the lumbar vertebrae group.
2.7. Measurement of Spinal Instability
Spinal instability was evaluated using the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) [17]. Based on the SINS, patients were classified into three categories: those with stable (SINS, 0–6), potentially unstable (SINS, 7–12), and unstable (SINS, 13–18) spines. Spinal instability was classified into stable and unstable groups. Measurements were recorded before RT.
2.8. Treatment Strategy
Patients who received chemotherapy and palliative treatment after RT were categorized as the chemotherapy and palliative treatment groups, respectively.
2.9. OS
Patients who survived ≥160 days were classified as the non-poor prognosis group, and those who survived <160 days were classified as the poor prognosis group. The cutoff value of OS was based on the median value of patients.
2.10. Statistical Analyses
Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests to identify factors associated with OS. Next, parameters with p < 0.1 using univariate analyses were further analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the factors that strongly influenced OS.
The relationship between ADL and treatment strategy was analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Factors affecting OS were assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in survival curves.
All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 22.0; IBM, Tokyo, Japan). All tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Patients
The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients received RT. None of the patients underwent surgery. The study included 143 men and 122 women. The mean age of the patients was 67.2 ± 10.6 (median, 67) years and the Barthel index was 74.7 ± 29.6 (median, 85).
The mean period from the diagnosis of SREs to receiving RT was 3.9 ± 10.0 days (median, 1). SREs of patients progressed after RT. Progression of SREs was confirmed a mean of 149.4 ± 164.1 (median, 119) days after RT.
3.2. Univariate Analysis
The mean OS was 377.5 ± 527.4 (median 158.0) days. The data from the univariate analysis are shown in Table 2. The numbers of patients in the non-poor and poor prognosis groups were 132 and 133, respectively. Age, sex, ADL, pain, the primary site, and treatment strategy for OS were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.1).
The OS values were 836.3 ± 736.7 days and 324.0 ± 506.4 days for the breast and other cancer groups, respectively.
3.3. Factors Affecting OS
The results of multiple logistic regression analysis are presented in Table 3. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that ADL, the primary site, and treatment strategy were significant predictors of OS (p < 0.05). High ADL, breast cancer, and chemotherapy had a positive effect on OS.
The Barthel indexes were 81.5 ± 25.9 and 67.2 ± 32.1 in the chemotherapy and palliative treatment groups, respectively. The Barthel index was significantly lower in the palliative treatment group than in the chemotherapy group (p < 0.05).
The Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival for ADL at 6 months and 1 year were 59.8% and 43.2% in the high ADL group and 38.4% and 19.9% in the low ADL group, respectively. The groups were significantly different (p = 0.001, log-rank test) (Figure 2). The survival estimates at the primary site at 6 months and 1 year were 82.7% and 63.5% in the breast cancer group and 41.5% and 23.9% in the other cancer group, respectively. The groups were significantly different (p < 0.0001, log-rank test) (Figure 3). The survival estimates of treatment strategy at 6 months and 1 year were 72.7% and 50.7% in the chemotherapy group and 21.1% and 8.9% in the palliative treatment group, respectively. The groups were significantly different (p < 0.0001, log-rank test) (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between OS and ADL in patients with SREs. The results showed that ADL, the primary site, and treatment strategy were the best predictors of OS.
The Karnofsky Performance Scale and ECOG PS were reported to be associated with survival in spinal bone metastases [12,18]. Among patients with bone metastases, an ECOG PS score > 2 or a higher serum alkaline phosphatase level had a strong negative effect on the prognosis [10]. In this study, ADL was evaluated using the Barthel index. The Barthel index evaluates not only stroke and orthopedic disorders but also the functional status and ADL of cancer patients [19,20]. In our study, ADL before RT affected the survival rate of patients with spinal bone metastases. Nakata examined the usefulness of a rapid referral system to provide urgent access to MRI scanning, referral to orthopedists, and administration of RT for the urgent management of neurological deficits caused by metastatic spinal cord compression. As a result, the use of the system significantly improved the incidence and severity of neurological deficits following treatment [21]. For the effects of rehabilitation, Rief et al. have shown that guided isometric training of the paravertebral muscles can be safely practiced in palliative patients with stable bone metastases of the vertebral column, improving their pain score and mobility [22]. For patients with SREs, improvements may be obtained by performing rehabilitation interventions to maintain and improve ADL, by constructing a system for monitoring spinal bone metastases with images before ADL decreases, and by performing interventions such as changes in treatment methods such as RT and surgery at appropriate times.
Chemotherapy is useful in prolonging the survival of cancer patients with bone metastasis [23,24,25]. The American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend that chemotherapy should not be used in patients with solid tumors, exhibiting an ECOG PS score of ≥3 [26]. Some studies have reported that when chemotherapy is administered to patients with poor performance, the response rate of chemotherapy is low, the side effects are strong, and OS is shortened [27,28,29]. In this study, chemotherapy had a positive effect on the survival time of patients with spinal bone metastases. The Barthel index was significantly lower in the palliative treatment group than in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy is difficult for patients with low ADL. Therefore, interventions of healthcare professionals are required to prevent ADL lowering in patients receiving chemotherapy.
OS of patients with bone metastases is shorter than that of patients without bone metastases [10]. The OS rates of spinal bone metastases from breast cancer after 1, 2, and 5 years were 84.8%, 66.3%, and 50%, respectively [16]. The OS rates of bone metastases from lung cancer after 1, 2, and 5 years were 39.8%, 18.7%, and 3.6%, respectively [12]. Breast cancer has a more favorable prognosis than other solid tumors, such as lung cancer [16]. In this study, breast cancer also had a positive effect on survival compared to other cancer types. Thus, the results of our study are in line with those of previous studies.
This study had a few limitations. First, this retrospective study includes various biases such as sample size, patient age, and target disease. Second, physical functions, such as muscle strength, skeletal muscle mass, and balance, were not evaluated; therefore, the effects of these functions on the survival time could not be estimated. Further research is required to examine these factors.
5. Conclusions
ADL, the primary site, and treatment strategy were found to be significant predictors of OS in patients with spinal bone metastases who received RT. For patients with SREs, improvements may be obtained by performing rehabilitation interventions to maintain and improve ADL, by constructing a system for monitoring spinal bone metastases with images before ADL decreases, and by performing interventions such as changes in treatment methods such as RT or surgery at appropriate times.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.N.; Data curation, Y.A. and E.N.; Funding acquisition, E.N.; Investigation, Y.A., E.N. and M.K.; Methodology, E.N. and S.S.; Project administration, Y.A. and E.N.; Supervision, E.N., S.S., Y.K., H.K., M.H. and T.O.; Writing—original draft, Y.A. and E.N.; Writing—review & editing, M.K., S.S., Y.K., H.K., M.H. and T.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were performed under an approved protocol and in accordance with the ethical standards of the Shikoku Cancer Center Ethics Committee (Approval No. 114) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to participants’ personal information.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Coleman, R.E. Clinical Features of Metastatic Bone Disease and Risk of Skeletal Morbidity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6243s–6249s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Oorschot, B.; Rades, D.; Schulze, W.; Beckmann, G.; Feyer, P. Palliative radiotherapy—New approaches. Semin. Oncol. 2011, 38, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coleman, R.E. Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 1997, 80, 1588–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatoum, H.T.; Lin, S.J.; Smith, M.R.; Barghout, V.; Lipton, A. Zoledronic acid and skeletal complications in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases: Analysis of a national medical claims database. Cancer 2008, 113, 1438–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rose, P.S.; Buchowski, J.M. Metastatic disease in the thoracic and lumbar spine: Evaluation and management. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2011, 19, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Janjan, N.; Lutz, S.T.; Bedwinek, J.M.; Hartsell, W.F.; Ng, A.; Pieters, R.S., Jr.; Ratanatharathorn, V.; Silberstein, E.B.; Taub, R.J.; Yasko, A.W.; et al. Therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of bone metastasis: A report from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology. J. Palliat. Med. 2009, 12, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitera, G.; Probyn, L.; Ford, M.; Donovan, A.; Rubenstein, J.; Finkelstein, J.; Christakis, M.; Zhang, L.; Campos, S.; Culleton, S.; et al. Correlation of computed tomography imaging features with pain response in patients with spine metastases after radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011, 81, 827–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.S.; Monk, G.; Clark, T.; Robinson, J.; Eigl, B.J.; Hagen, N. Palliative radiotherapy improves pain and reduces functional interference in patients with painful bone metastases: A quality assurance study. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 18, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Oorschot, B.; Schuler, M.; Simon, A.; Schleicher, U.; Geinitz, H. Patterns of care and course of symptoms in palliative radiotherapy: A multicenter pilot study analysis. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2011, 187, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, E.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Min, K.H.; Hur, G.Y.; Shim, J.J.; Kang, K.H.; Oh, S.C.; Seo, J.H.; Lee, S.Y.; et al. Prognostic Factors and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases at the Time of Diagnosis. Oncology 2016, 90, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizumoto, M.; Harada, H.; Asakura, H.; Hashimoto, T.; Furutani, K.; Hashii, H.; Murata, H.; Takagi, T.; Katagiri, H.; Takahashi, M.; et al. Radiotherapy for patients with metastases to the spinal column: A review of 603 patients at Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011, 79, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rief, H.; Muley, T.; Bruckner, T.; Welzel, T.; Rieken, S.; Bischof, M.; Lindel, K.; Combs, S.E.; Debus, J. Survival and prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with spinal bone metastases: A retrospective analysis of 303 patients. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2014, 190, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahoney, F.I.; Barthel, D.W. Functional evaluation: The barthel index. Md. State Med. J. 1965, 14, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
- Palacios-Ceña, D.; Gómez-Calero, C.; Cachón-Pérez, J.M.; Brea-Rivero, M.; Gómez-Pérez, D.; Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. Non-capable residents: Is the experience of dependence understood in nursing homes? A qualitative study. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2014, 14, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gastelurrutia, P.; Lupón, J.; Altimir, S.; de Antonio, M.; González, B.; Cabanes, R.; Rodríguez, M.; Urrutia, A.; Domingo, M.; Zamora, E.; et al. Fragility is a key determinant of survival in heart failure patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 175, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foerster, R.; Bruckner, T.; Bostel, T.; Schlampp, I.; Debus, J.; Rief, H. Prognostic factors for survival of women with unstable spinal bone metastases from breast cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fisher, C.G.; DiPaola, C.P.; Ryken, T.C.; Bilsky, M.H.; Shaffrey, C.I.; Berven, S.H.; Harrop, J.S.; Fehlings, M.G.; Boriani, S.; Chou, D.; et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: An evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine 2010, 35, E1221–E1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van der Linden, Y.M.; Dijkstra, S.P.; Vonk, E.J.; Marijnen, C.A.; Leer, J.W. Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: Results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy. Cancer 2005, 103, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, I.; Ito, K.; Takahashi, S.; Horibe, M.; Karita, R.; Nishizaka, C.; Nagai, T.; Hamada, K.; Sato, H.; Shindo, N. Association between bone scan index and activities of daily living in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Support. Care Cancer 2017, 25, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morishima, T.; Sato, A.; Nakata, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Koeda, N.; Shimada, H.; Maruhama, T.; Matsuki, D.; Miyashiro, I. Barthel Index-based functional status as a prognostic factor in young and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed gastric, colorectal and lung cancer: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e046681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, E.; Sugihara, S.; Sugawara, Y.; Nakahara, R.; Furumatsu, T.; Tetsunaga, T.; Kunisada, T.; Nakanishi, K.; Akezaki, Y.; Ozaki, T. Multidisciplinary treatment system for bone metastases for early diagnosis, treatment and prevention of malignant spinal cord compression. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 3137–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rief, H.; Omlor, G.; Akbar, M.; Welzel, T.; Bruckner, T.; Rieken, S.; Haefner, M.F.; Schlampp, I.; Gioules, A.; Habermehl, D.; et al. Feasibility of isometric spinal muscle training in patients with bone metastases under radiation therapy—First results of a randomized pilot trial. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zheng, X.Q.; Huang, J.F.; Lin, J.L.; Chen, L.; Zhou, T.T.; Chen, D.; Lin, D.D.; Shen, J.F.; Wu, A.M. Incidence, prognostic factors, and a nomogram of lung cancer with bone metastasis at initial diagnosis: A population-based study. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2019, 8, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, P.; Yan, J.; Liu, D.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Yue, X. Skeletal-related events and overall survival of patients with bone metastasis from nonsmall cell lung cancer—A retrospective analysis. Medicine 2017, 96, e9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccart-Gebhart, M.J.; Procter, M.; Leyland-Jones, B.; Goldhirsch, A.; Untch, M.; Smith, I.; Gianni, L.; Baselga, J.; Bell, R.; Jackisch, C.; et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1659–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schnipper, L.E.; Smith, T.J.; Raghavan, D.; Blayney, D.W.; Ganz, P.A.; Mulvey, T.M.; Wollins, D.S. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: The top five list for oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sánchez-Muñoz, A.; Pérez-Ruiz, E.; Sáez, M.I.; Trigo, J.M.; Galindo, M.M.; Manzaneque, L.; Jiménez, B.; Muros, B.; Alba, E. Limited impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival in advanced solid tumours in patients with poor performance status. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 13, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanley, K.E. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with inoperable lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1980, 65, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pater, J.L.; Loeb, M. Nonanatomic prognostic factors in carcinoma of the lung: A multivariate analysis. Cancer 1982, 50, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival for activities of daily living. ADL, activities of daily living.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival for activities of daily living. ADL, activities of daily living.
Figure 3.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival for primary site.
Figure 4.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival for treatment strategy.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the patients with bone metastases included in this study.
| Characteristic | Number |
|---|---|
| Primary cancer site | |
| Lung | 94 |
| Breast | 48 |
| Prostate | 30 |
| Colorectal | 23 |
| Stomach | 15 |
| Liver | 12 |
| Pancreatic | 8 |
| Others | 35 |
| ECOG PS | |
| 0 | 3 |
| 1 | 90 |
| 2 | 68 |
| 3 | 67 |
| 4 | 37 |
| Radiotherapy dose | |
| 8 Gy | 5 |
| 20 Gy | 47 |
| 24 Gy | 1 |
| 25 Gy | 2 |
| 25.2 Gy | 1 |
| 27 Gy | 1 |
| 29 Gy | 1 |
| 30 Gy | 179 |
| 32.5 Gy | 1 |
| 36 Gy | 1 |
| 37.5 Gy | 1 |
| 39 Gy | 1 |
| 40 Gy | 23 |
| 50 Gy | 1 |
| Skeletal-related events | |
| Vertebral bone fracture | 194 |
| Painful spinal bone metastases | 52 |
| Spinal cord compression | 19 |
ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.
Table 2.
Comparison of variables between the non-poor prognosis and poor prognosis groups.
| Variable | Non-Poor Prognosis Group | Poor Prognosis Group | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 66.0 ± 9.2 | 68.4 ± 11.8 | 0.051 |
| Sex (n) | 0.014 | ||
| Male | 61 (46%) | 82 (62%) | |
| Female | 71 (54%) | 51 (38%) | |
| Comorbidities (n) | 0.220 | ||
| Yes | 59 | 70 | |
| No | 73 | 63 | |
| ADL (n) | 0.002 | ||
| High ADL group | 78 (59%) | 53 (40%) | |
| Low ADL group | 54 (41%) | 80 (60%) | |
| Pain (scores) | 2.7 ± 3.2 | 3.8 ± 3.7 | 0.023 |
| Primary site (n) | p < 0.0001 | ||
| Breast cancer group | 42 (32%) | 6 (5%) | |
| Other cancer group | 90 (68%) | 127 (95%) | |
| Brain or visceral metastases (n) | 0.110 | ||
| Yes | 56 | 70 | |
| No | 76 | 63 | |
| Bone metastases other than the spine (n) | 0.388 | ||
| Yes | 56 | 64 | |
| No | 76 | 69 | |
| Spinal level of bone metastases (n) | 0.320 | ||
| Cervical and thoracic vertebrae group | 73 (55%) | 82 (62%) | |
| Lumbar vertebrae group | 59 (45%) | 51 (38%) | |
| Spinal instability (n) | 0.175 | ||
| Stable group | 65 (49%) | 54 (41%) | |
| Unstable group | 67 (51%) | 79 (59%) | |
| Treatment strategy (n) | p < 0.0001 | ||
| Chemotherapy group | 104 (79%) | 35 (26%) | |
| Palliative treatment group | 28 (21%) | 98 (74%) |
ADL, activities of daily living.
Table 3.
Factors affecting overall survival.
| Variable | B | Standard Error | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.017 | 0.015 | 1.017 (0.987–1.048) | 0.272 |
| Sex | −0.093 | 0.342 | 0.911 (0.466–1.780) | 0.785 |
| ADL | 0.635 | 0.321 | 1.887 (1.005–3.543) | 0.048 |
| Pain | −0.046 | 0.045 | 0.955 (0.874–1.044) | 0.313 |
| Primary site | 1.743 | 0.558 | 5.714 (1.914–17.062) | 0.002 |
| Treatment strategy | 2.115 | 0.321 | 8.286 (4.421–15.531) | p < 0.0001 |
B, unstandardized coefficient; CI, confidence interval; ADL, activities of daily living.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Akezaki, Y.; Nakata, E.; Kikuuchi, M.; Sugihara, S.; Katayama, Y.; Katayama, H.; Hamada, M.; Ozaki, T. Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases. Healthcare 2022, 10, 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020350
AMA Style
Akezaki Y, Nakata E, Kikuuchi M, Sugihara S, Katayama Y, Katayama H, Hamada M, Ozaki T. Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases. Healthcare. 2022; 10(2):350. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020350
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkezaki, Yoshiteru, Eiji Nakata, Masato Kikuuchi, Shinsuke Sugihara, Yoshimi Katayama, Haruyoshi Katayama, Masanori Hamada, and Toshifumi Ozaki. 2022. "Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases" Healthcare 10, no. 2: 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020350
APA StyleAkezaki, Y., Nakata, E., Kikuuchi, M., Sugihara, S., Katayama, Y., Katayama, H., Hamada, M., & Ozaki, T. (2022). Association between Overall Survival and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Bone Metastases. Healthcare, 10(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020350
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
