Developing an AI-Enabled Integrated Care Platform for Frailty
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Frailty
1.2. Shared Care Plans
1.3. Platform Challenges in Elder Care Services
2. Materials and Methods
- A mobile app for older adults and informal caregivers and a web app for healthcare professionals.
- Frailty and pre-frailty assessment and detection to prevent disability, avoid adverse health events, and hospital admissions.
- Social and healthcare system integration incorporating understanding of psychosocial factors and the gender dimension as well as correlations which may affect frailty progression.
- Compliance with ethical, legal, and regulatory requirements, including the general data protection regulation (GDPR) [18].
- Interoperability capabilities to connect with third party digital systems. The platform follows the interoperability-by-design principle based on international standardization efforts and best practices. It focuses on supporting the continuum of care to better support elder needs, to build and communicate meaningful information across service boundaries, and to facilitate better management of resources and provision of services. More specifically, the platform can connect to existing standards-compliant health infrastructure (e.g., hospital information systems and electronic health records) to support access to available citizen data.
- Frailty management support for the delivery of more user-centred care interventions with the aim of slowing the impact of frailty on cognition, mental health, autonomy, and quality of life.
- Facilitation of user empowerment towards self-management and autonomy through (amongst other factors) the education and training of the care team, including informal caregivers.
- User experience improvement through a rigorous monitoring and performance evaluation system intended to improve the provision of goal-directed services and facilitate data collection for research purposes in order to connect the results into an evidence-based roadmap.
- User-centred techniques appropriate for the profiles of the older adult users who may be pre-frail and feeling lonely and/or isolated.
- Adaptiveness to user needs and to their level of familiarity with new technologies.
- Services to mitigate feelings of loneliness and isolation, avoid social exclusion, and support mental health and independent living.
- Promotion of healthy lifestyles and safe habits.
- Sustainable and affordable in terms of purchasing price, maintenance, and operating costs.
3. Results
3.1. The Application Tier
3.2. Business Logic Tier
- As soon as a risk for frailty or pre-frailty is assessed for a specific adult, an appropriate alert is provided to the care professionals.
- In case of critical events (e.g., dangerous blood sugar levels), an alert is provided based on biometric data thresholds.
- In the case of an emergency (e.g., a fall), the system prompts an urgent alert to the caregiver (if applicable) and informs a nearby emergency centre.
- The self-assessment module uses combined lifestyle data from the lifestyle monitoring module to inform physicians in case of alerts, whereas the lifestyle monitoring module can send alerts as well based on expert-defined rules and collected data.
- Alerts can be issued as a reminder to follow the care plan.
- Alerts can be sent based on calendar events (reminding of a visit, an event, family birthdays and other socialization related events, etc.)
- In case of critical events (e.g., dangerous blood sugar levels), based on biometric data thresholds the appropriate alert will be sent to the older adult based on their individual profile.
3.3. Semantics and AI Tier
3.4. Interoperability Services
- ISO/IEC 27018:2019
- ISO 9001:2015
- ISO/IEC 27017:2015
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013
4. Discussion
4.1. How Global Needs Are Addressed
- Support to integrated health care delivery through the promotion of older adults’ active participation into her or his care plan, facilitating the adoption of integrated pathways of care that are more efficient, less costly, and that enable autonomy.
- Uninterrupted and secure sharing of information through, e.g., alerts, newsfeeds, etc., among all involved stakeholders, enabling communication of meaningful information across service boundaries, reducing unnecessary visits, and accelerating emergency handling responses, thus improving sense of security.
- Psychological and emotional support to mitigate emotional distress, loneliness and isolation while avoiding social exclusion, supporting independent living, and promoting healthy lifestyles and safe habits.
- Through appropriate education and training, engagement and technology acceptance are enabled, as older adults may face difficulties in using some technologies due to a low level of proficiency with digital skills.
- When appropriately combined, homogenized, and used, data analytics and AI technologies (through advanced machine learning and big data techniques) can be used to formulate a solid global health knowledge base.
4.2. Potential Value and Benefits to Stakeholders
4.2.1. Potential Benefits for Elderly People
- Empowerment of older adults to better manage their condition and their life by being offered a digital solution for the prevention and management of frailty that encourages independent living and wellbeing and supports self-management as well as personalized training about frailty in close cooperation with healthcare and social care professionals and caregivers.
- Increased sense of safeness at home despite functional limitations due to health conditions, and improved perception of loneliness and isolation due to better managing critical events/emergencies such as falls or acute episodes based on the use of preventive and emergency alerts.
- Preventing loneliness and isolation by using a digital tool that supports psychological and emotional support in close cooperation with informal caregivers, formal caregivers, social workers, and other professionals.
- Prevention and comprehensive management of functional and cognitive decline and psychosocial frailty and isolation and/or the perception of loneliness and isolation due to multimodal interventions supported by the solution.
- Increased role of older adults in their own care and effective self-management.
- Easy access to specialized healthcare and group support with people with the same or similar conditions.
- Improved health outcomes and quality of life due to better frailty management provided in cooperation with their attending healthcare and social care professionals based on a personalized shared care plan, optimized drug therapy, personalized monitoring, coaching for a healthy lifestyle, training, and improved adherence to therapy.
- Reduced number of visits to healthcare providers’ facilities as compared to current care.
- Overall improved patient experience regarding the level of frailty management and integration of care among care givers.
4.2.2. Potential Benefits for Healthcare Professionals and Social Workers
- Empowerment of healthcare professionals and/or social workers to better manage pre-frailty and frailty by using a digital tool that supports systematic routine screening for pre-frailty stages in at risk older adults in clinical practice based on frailty algorithms that embed available existing data and data from other sources, predictive methods based on artificial intelligence, and by having access to an SCP and easy-to-use summaries (dashboard), allowing prioritisation of cases and faster reaction to patient needs.
- Better information exchange and improved communication and decision-making through the use of an SCP and dashboard as well as artificial intelligence based on users’ clinical and laboratory results and data derived from self-assessment (wearables and self-report), accomplished activities, etc.
- A better-informed, prepared, and trained workforce through use of a digital solution that supports integrated pathways of care.
- Reduced time required for healthcare professionals and social care workers to manage a person with frailty due to frailty algorithms, AI-based predictive methods, SCP, dashboard, etc.
- An improved experience for healthcare and social care professionals in managing patients with frailty.
4.2.3. Potential Benefits for Healthcare and Social Care Systems
- Seamless, integrated frailty care approach covering the whole journey of citizens/patients through the health continuum of detection, diagnosis, management and home care based on integration of the solution with various sources of data, including patient-generated data processed through medical devices and the procurer’s existing electronic health records, personal health records, etc.
- Improved healthcare processes regarding frailty management based on a seamless and integrated frailty care approach.
- A shift to patient-centric intervention strategies that support the promotion of independent living of the ageing population by matching older adults’ needs, preferences, and limitations with existing care pathways and SCPs.
- Lower costs of healthcare and social care services related to frailty (e.g., reduced hospital admissions/emergency department visits, bed occupancy, laboratory exams, etc.) due to better management of pre-frail and frail patients at the community level, including detection of pre-frail and frail patients, provision of psychological and emotional support, functional decline support, and managing of critical events/emergencies.
- Managing demand and increased sustainability/cost-effectiveness of health and social care by optimizing resources, systems and societal costs associated with ageing through the promotion of cooperation between all involved stakeholders (healthcare professionals, formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and social workers).
- Improved public health for the ageing population thanks to prevention and better management of frailty and related conditions.
4.3. Main Challenges for Platform Implementation
- Conservatism and reluctance to adopt new technologies on the part of healthcare providers.
- Integration with IT systems of healthcare and social care organizations can encounter many potential problems.
- Definition of a clear value proposition that addresses unmet stakeholder needs.
- Combining healthcare and technical expertise to develop a robust and compliant solution that protects privacy, complies with regulations, and achieves interoperability along with reliable production.
- Demonstration of the safety and efficacy of the solution through clinical trials and/or real-world use, as well as gaining and maintaining regulatory approval, are critical factors necessary to support both the credibility of the solution and market access.
- This previous challenge is highly related to the appropriate certification that such a platform should receive (CE mark) as well as to medical device regulation (MDR) compliance. As the platform includes AI algorithms, it should additionally be compliant with EU Artificial Intelligence Act, ensuring that all required regulatory conditions are appropriately met.
- Validation of the potential impact of the solution (i.e., the value propositions) and the profitability of the solution.
- Achieving fit between the value proposition of the integrated platform and the needs and expectations of users.
- Developing a sustainable and scalable business model that supports the operation of the solution in real-world environments.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Eurostat Statistics Explained. Population Structure and Ageing. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Population_structure_and_ageing (accessed on 27 December 2021).
- Eurostat Statistics Explained. Healthcare Expenditure Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Healthcare_expenditure_statistics (accessed on 27 December 2021).
- European Commission. The 2015 Ageing Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- WHO (World Health Organization). Digital Tools for COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Annex: Contact Tracing in the Context of COVID-19, 2 June 2020; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, M.; Rolfson, D.; Khera, A.S.; Dabravolskaj, J.; Dent, E.; Xia, L. Identification and management of frailty in the primary care setting. Can. Med Assoc. J. 2018, 190, E1134–E1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pilotto, A.; Custodero, C.; Maggi, S.; Polidori, M.C.; Veronese, N.; Ferrucci, L. A multidimensional approach to frailty in older people. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020, 60, 101047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO (World Health Organization). Integrated Care for Older People: Guidelines on Community-Level Interventions to Manage Declines in Intrinsic Capacity; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Leichsenring, K. Integrated care for older people in Europe—Latest trends and perceptions. Int. J. Integr. Care 2012, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Dongen, J.J.J.; van Bokhoven, M.A.; Daniëls, R.; van der Weijden, T.; Emonts, W.W.G.P.; Beurskens, A. Developing interprofessional care plans in chronic care: A scoping review. BMC Fam. Pract. 2016, 17, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Leblanc, A.; Kenny, D.A.; O’Connor, A.M.; Légaré, F. Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: A dyadic approach to shared decision making. Med. Decis. Mak. 2009, 29, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kondylakis, H.; Bucur, A.; Crico, C.; Dong, F.; Graf, N.; Hoffman, S.; Koumakis, L.; Manenti, A.; Marias, K.; Mazzocco, K.; et al. Patient empowerment for cancer patients through a novel ICT infrastructure. J. Biomed. Inform. 2020, 101, 103342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kouroubali, A.; Koumakis, L.; Kondylakis, H.; Katehakis, D.G. An integrated approach towards developing quality mobile health apps for cancer. In Big Data Analytics in HIV/AIDS Research; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 46–71. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. eHealth Network Guidelines to the EU Member States and the European Commission on an Interoperable Eco-System for Digital Health and Investment Programmes for a New/Updated Generation of Digital Infrastructure in Europe; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Katehakis, D.G.; Kouroubali, A. Digital transformation challenges for the implementation of quality electronic medical records. In Promoting Patient Engagement and Participation for Effective Healthcare Reform; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 63–91. [Google Scholar]
- Katehakis, D.G.; Kouroubali, A. A framework for eHealth interoperability management. J. Strat. Innov. Sustain. 2019, 14, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouroubali, A.; Katehakis, D.G. The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment. J. Biomed. Inform. 2019, 94, 103166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Kaur, P.J. A simulation model for incremental software development life cycle model. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 2017, 8, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crico, C.; Renzi, C.; Graf, N.; Buyx, A.; Kondylakis, H.; Koumakis, L.; Pravettoni, G. mHealth and telemedicine apps: In search of a common regulation. Ecancermedicalscience 2018, 12, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leniz, J.; Weil, A.; Higginson, I.J.; Sleeman, E.K. Electronic palliative care coordination systems (EPaCCS): A systematic review. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2019, 10, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verbakel, E.; Tamlagsrønning, S.; Winstone, L.; Fjær, E.L.; Eikemo, T.A. Informal care in Europe: Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health. Eur. J. Public Heal. 2017, 27, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mertz, L. Medical care in the digital era. IEEE Pulse 2021, 12, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katehakis, D.G.; Kouroubali, A.; Karatzanis, I.; Manousos, D.; Kondylakis, H.; Kavlentakis, G.; Stathiakis, N.; Koumakis, L.; Chatzimina, M.E.; Marias, K. Personal Health ICT Systems to Support Integrated Care Solutions, Technical Report, FORTH-ICS/TR-472 (2018); FORTH Institute of Computer Science: Heraklion, Greece, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kondylakis, H.; Katehakis, D.G.; Kouroubali, A.; Marias, K.; Flouris, G.; Patkos, T.; Fundulaki, I.; Plexousakis, D. CareKeeper: A platform for intelligent care coordination. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Kragujevac, Serbia, 25–27 October 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kouroubali, A.; Kondylakis, H.; Koumakis, L.; Papagiannakis, G.; Zikas, P.; Katehakis, D.G. iSupport: Building a resilience support tool for improving the health condition of the patient during the care path. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2019, 261, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kondylakis, H.; Kouroubali, A.; Katehakis, D. Patient preferences: An unexplored area in the post-pandemic era. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), Auckland, New Zealand, 7–10 December 2021; pp. 863–866. [Google Scholar]
- Kondylakis, H.; Spanakis, E.G.; Sfakianakis, S.; Sakkalis, V.; Tsiknakis, M.; Marias, K.; Zhao, X.; Yu, H.Q.; Dong, F. Digital patient: Personalized and translational data management through the MyHealthAvatar EU project. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, 25–29 August 2015; Volume 2015, pp. 1397–1400. [Google Scholar]
- Katehakis, D.G.; Kouroubali, A.; Kavlentakis, G.; Stathiakis, N.; Logothetidis, F.; Petrakis, Y.; Tzikoulis, V.; Kostomanolakis, S.; Kondylakis, H. Data management, semantics and personal health apps for staying safe in COVID-19. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2020, 2759, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anstey, K.J.; Dixon, A.R. Applying a cumulative deficit model of frailty to dementia: Progress and future challenges. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2014, 6, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, S.; Jain, S.; Wanjari, A.; Mandal, S. Development and validation of a modified Frailty Risk Index as a predictor of mortality in rural elderly people. Asian J. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2019, 14, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrakis, Y.; Kouroubali, A.; Katehakis, D. A mobile app architecture for accessing EMRs using XDS and FHIR. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Athens, Greece, 28–30 October 2019; pp. 278–283. [Google Scholar]
- Katehakis, D.G.; Kondylakis, H.; Koumakis, L.; Kouroubali, A.; Marias, K. Integrated care solutions for the citizen: Personal health record functional models to support interoperability. Eur. J. Biomed. Inform. 2017, 13, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triantafyllidis, A.K.; Koutkias, V.G.; Chouvarda, I.; Adami, I.; Kouroubali, A.; Maglaveras, N. Framework of sensor-based monitoring for pervasive patient care. Heal. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beard, H.P.J.R.; Bloom, D.E. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet 2015, 385, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keränen, N.S.; Kangas, M.; Immonen, M.; Similä, H.; Enwald, H.; Korpelainen, R.; Jämsä, T. Use of Information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: A population-based survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gallucci, A.; Trimarchi, P.D.; Abbate, C.; Tuena, C.; Pedroli, E.; Lattanzio, F.; Stramba-Badiale, M.; Cesari, M.; Giunco, F. ICT technologies as new promising tools for the managing of frailty: A systematic review. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 33, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Ramírez, A.; Martinikorena, I.; Gómez, M.; Lecumberri, P.; Millor, N.; Rodriguez-Mañas, L.; García, F.J.G.; Izquierdo, M. Frailty assessment based on trunk kinematic parameters during walking. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2015, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, S.; Honda, T.; Chen, T.; Narazaki, K.; Haeuchi, Y.; Supartini, A.; Kumagai, S. Screening for frailty phenotype with objectively-measured physical activity in a west Japanese suburban community: Evidence from the Sasaguri Genkimon Study. BMC Geriatr. 2015, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fontecha, J.; Hervás, R.; Bravo, J.; Navarro, F.J.; Alaman, X.; Coronato, A.; Lopez-De-Ipiña, D.; Albrecht, U.-V. A mobile and ubiquitous approach for supporting frailty assessment in elderly people. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013, 15, e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganea, R.; Paraschiv-Ionescu, A.; Büla, C.; Rochat, S.; Aminian, K. Multi-parametric evaluation of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions in elderly people. Med. Eng. Phys. 2011, 33, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upatising, B.; Hanson, G.J.; Kim, Y.L.; Cha, S.S.; Yih, Y.; Takahashi, P.Y. Effects of home telemonitoring on transitions between frailty states and death for older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2013, 6, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goodwin, N. Tomorrow’s world: Is digital health the disruptive innovation that will drive the adoption of integrated care systems? Int. J. Integr. Care 2018, 18, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kouroubali, A.; Kondylakis, H.; Logothetidis, F.; Katehakis, D.G. Developing an AI-Enabled Integrated Care Platform for Frailty. Healthcare 2022, 10, 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030443
Kouroubali A, Kondylakis H, Logothetidis F, Katehakis DG. Developing an AI-Enabled Integrated Care Platform for Frailty. Healthcare. 2022; 10(3):443. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030443
Chicago/Turabian StyleKouroubali, Angelina, Haridimos Kondylakis, Fokion Logothetidis, and Dimitrios G. Katehakis. 2022. "Developing an AI-Enabled Integrated Care Platform for Frailty" Healthcare 10, no. 3: 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030443
APA StyleKouroubali, A., Kondylakis, H., Logothetidis, F., & Katehakis, D. G. (2022). Developing an AI-Enabled Integrated Care Platform for Frailty. Healthcare, 10(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030443