Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Representative Cases
3. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yao, W.; Wang, T.; Jiang, B.; Gao, F.; Wang, L.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, W.; Yao, S.; Mei, W.; Chen, X.; et al. Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: Lessons learnt and international expert recommendations. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, e28–e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewster, D.J.; Chrimes, N.; Do, T.B.; Fraser, K.; Groombridge, C.J.; Higgs, A.; Humar, M.J.; Leeuwenburg, T.J.; McGloughlin, S.; Newman, F.G.; et al. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med. J. Aust. 2020, 212, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, T.M.; El-Boghdadly, K.; McGuire, B.; McNarry, A.F.; Patel, A.; Higgs, A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Zuo, M. Personal protective equipment during tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional survey. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, e420–e422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.J.; Song, J.Q.; Wu, L.L.; Cheng, H.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.Y. Personal protective equipment provision amongst Chinese anaesthesia departments before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022, 128, e317–e320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canelli, R.; Connor, C.W.; Gonzalez, M.; Nozari, A.; Ortega, R. Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1957–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenblatt, W.H.; Sherman, J.D. More on Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovatsis, P.G.; Matava, C.T.; Peyton, J.M. More on Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.L.; Huang, C.H.; Luk, H.N.; Tsai, P.B. Adaptation to the plastic barrier sheet to facilitate intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth. Analg. 2020, 131, e97–e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luk, H.N.; Yang, Y.L.; Tsai, P.B. Application of plastic sheet barrier and video intubating stylet to protect tracheal intubators during Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic: A Taiwan experience. Cell Transplant. 2021, 30, 0963689720987527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, P.B.; Luk, H.N. Plastic sheet and video intubating stylet: A technical note. Asian J. Anesthesiol. 2021, 59, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tsai, P.B.; Luk, H.N. Sheet barrier and intubating stylet. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, 1058–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuempfig, N.D.; Toulouie, S.; Durant, E.J.; Nadir, N.A. Comparison of the characteristics of intubation airway barrier devices using a simulated airway task trainer. Cureus 2022, 14, e22817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shikani, A.H. New “seeing” stylet-scope and method for the management of the difficult airway. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1999, 120, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levitan, R.M. Design rationale and intended use of a short optical stylet for routine fiberoptic augmentation of emergency laryngoscopy. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2006, 24, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsay, P.-J.; Yang, C.-P.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Video-Assisted intubating stylet technique for difficult intubation: A case series report. Healthcare 2022, 10, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.P.; Luk, H.N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. The use of a video-assisted intubating stylet technique in a critically ill and contagious COVID-19 patient. Healthcare 2022, 10, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.N.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Pender, M.; Wang, N.; Yan, F.; Ying, X.H.; Tang, S.L.; Fu, C.W. Reduction in healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e003421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pujolar, G.; Oliver-Anglès, A.; Vargas, I.; Vázquez, M.L. Changes in access to health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moynihan, R.; Sanders, S.; Michaleff, Z.A.; Scott, A.M.; Clark, J.; To, E.J.; Jones, M.; Kitchener, E.; Fox, M.; Johansson, M.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e045343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Glenn, S.; Sy, L.; Qian, L.; Hong, V.; Ryan, D.S.; Jacobsen, S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization in a large integrated health care system: Retrospective cohort study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e26558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aziz, M.F.; Dillman, D.; Fu, R.; Brambrink, A.M. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012, 116, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Paolini, J.B.; Donati, F.; Drolet, P. Review article: Video-laryngoscopy: Another tool for difficult intubation or a new paradigm in airway management? Can. J. Anaesth. 2013, 60, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hansel, J.; Rogers, A.M.; Lewis, S.R.; Cook, T.M.; Smith, A.F. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 4, CD011136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begley, J.L.; Lavery, K.E.; Nickson, C.P.; Brewster, D.J. The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: An in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.W.; Lam, R.P.K.; Sin, W.C.; Irwin, M.G.; Rainer, T.H. Comparison of the efficiency and usability of aerosol box and intubation tent on intubation of a manikin using personal protective equipment: A randomized crossover study. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 61, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor Azhar, M.; Bustam, A.; Poh, K.; Ahmad Zahedi, A.Z.; Mohd Nazri, M.Z.A.; Azizah Ariffin, M.A.; Md Yusuf, M.H.; Zambri, A.; Chong, J.Y.O.; Kamarudin, A.; et al. COVID-19 aerosol box as protection from droplet and aerosol contaminations in healthcare workers performing airway intubation: A randomised cross-over simulation study. Emerg. Med. J. 2021, 38, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, T.; Asai, T. Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: A narrative review. J. Anesth. 2021, 35, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Case A | Case B | Case C | Case D | Case E | Case F | Case G | Case H | Case I | Case J | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rapid antigen test/PCR test | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Positive | Positive |
Surgery type | Elective | Emergent | Elective | Elective | Emergent | Elective | Elective | Elective | Emergent | Emergent |
Age/gender | 44/F | 35/M | 51/M | 51/M | 28/F | 74/M | 61/F | 37/M | 68/M | 39/M |
Height (cm)/weight (kg); (BMI, kg/m2) | 159/81; 32.0 | 175/76; 24.8 | 166/66; 23.9 | 169/70; 24.5 | 160/59; 23.0 | 155/60 24.9 | 155/59; 24.5 | 170/65 22.4 | 157/69; 27.9 | 176/76; 24.5 |
First attempt success | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Number of attempt | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Time to intubate | 8 s | 10 s | 7 s | 14 s | 6 s | 6 s | 7 s | 9 s | 43 s | 12 s |
Laryngeal and glottic view | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full |
Degree of difficulty for intubation | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | In a spin # | Easy * |
Need to Require additional external maneuvers | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Complications (soft tissues or dental injuries) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Intubating device | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
Case K | Case L | Case M | Case N | Case O | Case P | Case Q | Case R | Case S | Case T | |
Rapid antigen test/PCR test | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
Surgery type | Emergent | Emergent | Elective | Emergent | Elective | Elective | Elective | Elective | Elective | Elective |
Age/gender | 65/M | 53/F | 65/F | 30/F | 75/F | 88/F | 67/M | 57/F | 70/M | 52/M |
Height (cm)/weight (kg); (BMI, kg/m2) | 164/99; 36.8 | 158/60; 24.0 | 153/59; 25.2 | 170/68; 23.5 | 160/80; 31.1 | 150/56; 24.8 | 169/76; 26.6 | 160/59; 23.0 | 158/63; 25.2 | 168/82; 29.0 |
First attempt success | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Time to intubate (from lip to trachea) | 11 s | 6 s | 7 s | 8 s | 8 s | 7 s | 42 s | 42 s | 58 s | 6 s |
Laryngeal & glottic view | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full |
Degree of difficulty for intubation | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | In a spin | In a spin | In a spin | Easy |
Need to Require additional external maneuvers | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Complications (soft tissues or dental injuries) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Intubating device | T | T | T | T | T | T | S | S | S | T |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, C.-H.; Su, I.-M.; Jhuang, B.-J.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105
Huang C-H, Su I-M, Jhuang B-J, Luk H-N, Qu JZ, Shikani A. Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare. 2022; 10(6):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Ching-Hsuan, I-Min Su, Bo-Jyun Jhuang, Hsiang-Ning Luk, Jason Zhensheng Qu, and Alan Shikani. 2022. "Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients" Healthcare 10, no. 6: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105
APA StyleHuang, C. -H., Su, I. -M., Jhuang, B. -J., Luk, H. -N., Qu, J. Z., & Shikani, A. (2022). Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare, 10(6), 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105