Next Article in Journal
Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Acupuncture, Intravenous Lidocaine, and Diet in the Management of Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Conditions for Feasibility of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Social Isolation and Loneliness in Noninstitutionalized Older Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Analysis of a Modified Anterior Approach to Hip Pericapsular Neurolysis for Inoperable Hip Fracture Using the IDEAL Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients

1
Department of Anesthesia, Hualien Tzuchi Hospital, Hualien 97002, Taiwan
2
Bio-Math Laboratory, Department of Financial Engineering, Providence University, Taichung 43301, Taiwan
3
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
4
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LifeBridge Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA
5
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105
Submission received: 14 May 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 10 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue All-Time Paradigm Shift of Anesthesia Management and Pain Medicine)

Abstract

:
As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, infection with the Omicron variants has become a serious risk to global public health. Anesthesia providers are often called upon for endotracheal intubations for COVID patients. Expedite and safe intubation can save patient’s life, while minimizing the virus exposure to the anesthesia provider and personnel involved during airway intervention is very important to protect healthcare workers and conserve the medical work force. In this paper, we share clinical experience of using a video-assisted intubating stylet technique combined with a simple plastic sheet barrier placed over the patients’ mouth for tracheal intubation during the Omicron crisis in Taiwan. We demonstrated that the use of an intubating stylet combined with plastic sheet barrier is swift, safe, and accurate in securing the airway in patients with COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The spread of COVID-19 was temporarily contained by the end of 2021 in Taiwan after many lives were lost since the pandemic started in December 2019 (Figure 1, time point A). However, an unprecedented surge of infections hit Taiwan again in April 2022, the culprit this time being the Omicron variants (Figure 1, time point B). The three most common lineages of Omicron are identified as BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3. Although Omicron generally causes less severe disease than its predecessor, a large volume of cases in a community in a short time period could potentially overwhelm the healthcare system.
Under the airway consensus and guidelines, video-laryngoscopy is recommended as the first-choice tracheal intubation tool during the COVID-19 pandemic [1,2,3]. Meanwhile, personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential and required for airway managers (operators) who care for the COVID-19 patients [4,5]. Initially a variety of improvised devices were designed to protect the airway managers from contaminations, such as the aerosol box, which was designed as a barrier enclosure for tracheal intubators [6]. Unfortunately, it was quickly shown that such boxes were potentially more harmful to both patients and the medical staff [7,8]. We proposed applying a piece of clear plastic sheet as a drape along with a video-assisted intubating stylet for tracheal intubation to protect the intubator from exposure to the aerosol and/or secretions during intubation (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [9,10,11,12]. The clear and soft plastic sheet adds an additional layer of protection against the possible splash of secretion/mucus, without interference or hindering of the intubation procedure [13]. In this report, we share our own clinical experience of applying the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet technique [14,15,16,17] with a plastic sheet that acts as an ancillary barrier in patients during the Omicron pandemic in Taiwan (Figure 1, time point B).
In the following case presentations, the tracheal intubation was performed by a senior anesthesiologist with many years of experience in laryngoscopy and the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet technique. The assistants were the residents from the Department of Anesthesia. It should be mentioned that, in this 1110-bed hospital with 20,000 anesthesia cases annually, more than 90% of tracheal intubations were conducted using the above technique (i.e., more than 7000 cases a year).

2. Representative Cases

From 1 April to 30 April 2022, due to hospital-wide Omicron infection, all in-hospital medical routine and elective surgical operations were suspended at our institution, with only emergency and urgent surgical procedures being performed. The surgery volume decreased by 90%. The tracheal intubators were recommended to use optimal barriers against any saliva/mucus spread or spill from patients’ mouths and airways during induction of anesthesia in addition to wearing PPE. All of the following 20 cases in this report were performed by the senior anesthesiologist using the video-assisted intubating stylet technique and plastic drape (Figure 2 and Figure 3). A technical note describing how to fabricate and prepare a plastic sheet as a barrier has been previously written [11]. Briefly, a transparent and soft plastic sheet (e.g., excised from a plastic trash bag made of ethylene vinyl acetate, 0.05–0.10 mm in thickness; 50 × 80 cm2 in size) was prepared. Two separate holes were made to accommodate the intubating stylet and suction, respectively, on the drape shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 (58 × 58 cm in size, Yao I Fabric Co., Ltd., Hemei Township, Changhua County, Taiwan). The patient was preoxygenated with the mask and the circuit connected to the anesthesia machine. After the patient was anesthetized and ready for tracheal intubation, the mask was removed and then the stylet-endotracheal tube was introduced through the premade perforation of the drape. After the endotracheal intubation was confirmed, the plastic sheet was carefully split along a seamline, inverted, and removed. Caution was made to ensure no further contamination from the plastic drape. The endotracheal tube was secured according to institution standard.
The first patient (case A in Table 1) was a 44-year-old woman (159 cm/81 kg, BMI 32.0 kg/m2) scheduled to undergo DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and ovarian cystectomy (Figure 4). General anesthesia was induced with routine medications, including glycopyrrolate, midazolam, fentanyl, lidocaine, propofol, and rocuronium. A 7.0 mm endotracheal tube was introduced into the upper airway using the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet technique. The intubation process was smooth and shown in Figure 4 and in a video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S1.
The second patient (case B in Table 1) was a 35-year-old man (175 cm/76 kg, BMI 24.8 kg/m2) for emergency laparoscopic appendectomy (Figure 5). Anesthesia was induced with routine medications (including glycopyrrolate, midazolam, fentanyl, lidocaine, propofol, and rocuronium). Copious foamy secretions were present in the oropharynx. The epiglottis was floppy and the vocal cord was posteriorly displaced. The intubation was successful on the first attempt using the Shikani technique with a 7.0 mm endotracheal tube (video clip in the Supplementary Material Video S2).
Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 shows the intubation in a patient (case C in Table 1) with anticipated difficult airway. A 51-year-old man (166 cm, 66 kg, BMI 23.9 kg/m2) with lung abscess and pulmonary empyema was scheduled to receive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The patient had suffered from tongue squamous cell carcinoma (pT4aN2c, LVE/PNI positive) and was to receive combined surgical treatment with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy. The pre-operative airway evaluation predicted difficult airway management due to limited mouth-opening (<3 cm), upper lip overbite (Mallampati grade 3), and stiff neck secondary to radiation therapy. Copious and thick mucus secretions were seen during airway examination (Figure 6). An 8.0 mm endotracheal tube was used in anticipating difficulty intubation and placement of a double-lumen endobronchial tube. The tracheal intubation was performed using the Shikani technique (Figure 7). The intubation process was smooth and shown in Figure 8 and in the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S3.
Figure 9 and Figure 10 demonstrate the Shikani technique intubation with double-lumen tube. A 51-year-old man (case D in Table 1; 169 cm, 70 kg, BMI 24.5 kg/m2) with pulmonary empyema (right-side lung) was scheduled for VATS. He also suffered lung adenocarcinoma (cT4N2M1c stage IVB) with brain and bone metastases. The transparent plastic sheet barrier was applied as shown in Figure 9. The left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (35 Fr) was placed on the 1st attempt. The intubation process was smooth and shown in Figure 10 and video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S4.
The last case to be presented is a 39-year-old man (case J in Table 1; 176 cm/76 kg, BMI 24.5 kg/m2) who had deep cutting injuries over extremities and massive bleeding. Emergency plastic surgery was scheduled under general anesthesia. A piece of plastic sheet barrier was put on before starting tracheal intubation using the Shikani technique. The intubation procedure was smooth, swift, and accurate (Figure 11 and the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S5). The whole surgical procedure was smooth and was completed in 3 h.

3. Discussion

Healthcare utilization and services were dramatically constrained during the COVID-19 pandemic [18,19,20,21], and it became imperative to protect healthcare workers against infection when caring for COVID-infected patients. In-hospital spread of Omicron infection occurred at our institution in April 2022, after a huge surge of cases in the general population of Taiwan (Figure 1). Several measures were taken to address the pandemic, including massive antigen rapid testing and PCR screening, surveillance, containment, and reduction in non-emergency out-patient department visits and surgical operations. There was an urgent need for a safe and reliable airway management method during urgent and emergent intubations in the operating theatre, emergency rooms, intensive care units and general wards.
After the outbreak and later pandemic of COVID-19 in December 2019, several airway management consensus guidelines were proposed [1,2,3]. Adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) became a requirement for all frontline healthcare providers, including airway intubators who cared for a patient with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. These include an N95 mask respirator, eye protection goggles, a face shield, hand hygiene, gloves, scrubs, protective clothing, a disposable cap, disposable shoe covers and when accessible, a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) [4,5]. The problem was that full gear PPE was not always available, nor affordable. Supplemental protective measures were hence needed to provide additional protection for airway management providers.
Many methods and techniques were previously described to safeguard airway intubators, including an aerosol box-like physical barrier which was supposed to decrease the amount of potential aerosol and droplets exposure [6]. Unfortunately, it was quickly found that such devices had significant limitations and even caused potential harm both to the patients and the intubators [7,8]. In this paper, we describe a simple method using the Shikani technique and an inexpensive and readily available clear plastic drape which covers the patient’s head and upper body and contains any aerosol spread during airway intubation [9,10,11,12]. Devices incorporating the use of a plastic drape and/or barrier were previously reported for provider protection during airway management and aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs) [13]. Using the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet through the drape allows the operator to continuously visualize the upper airway and glottis from a distance during the intubation without the operator having to place his/her face close to the mouth of the patient. We recommend that the provider also uses PPE, to provide further protection.
Since they were introduced decades ago, video-laryngoscopes have brought a paradigm shift for airway management, both in normal and difficult conditions [22,23]. Meta-analysis shows that video-laryngoscopy is superior to conventional direct laryngoscopy [24]. In our 1110-bed tertiary medical center in Taiwan, more than 92% of intubations are performed with the Shikani technique using a video-assisted intubating stylet. The rest of the intubations are conducted either with video-laryngoscopes or flexible fiber-optic bronchoscopes. Accordingly, we have a uniquely large clinical experience with this technique and we emphasize its advantages over video-laryngoscopy [10,12].
In this article, we present 20 clinical cases in which the video-assisted intubating technique and plastic sheet barrier were used for airway intubation during the April 2022 Omicron surge in Taiwan (the time point B in Table 1). In our opinion, this method of intubation is safe and effective, and we recommend it for managing COVID-positive patients or patients suspected to be infected with the virus, in order to avoid infection of the intubating operator. We realize that we do not have full data on the infection rates of the operator, as we did not routinely test our providers after procedures. However, our operator did not exhibit any clinical signs or symptoms of COVID infection. We also note that all intubations were carried out exclusively by one senior anesthesiologist, who was quite experienced in using the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet. We believe that an experienced operator is optimal when intubating COVID cases, in order to expedite the procedure and avoid any trials and errors that are typically seen during a novice’s learning curve. The learning curve for the novice operators to use intubating stylet technique could vary individually and widely, from the very best (n = 2) to very hesitant (n = 10). Hence, it is recommended that the junior practitioners practice first their airway management skills in a medical simulation center (cadaver-based learning) and a clinical skill training center (mannequin-based learning), and then move to routine anesthesia cases prior to handling patients who may be infected with COVID. Even though the plastic sheet barrier is a good and sensible enclosure to prevent further contaminations from intubation (such as splashed saliva or spilled mucus from patients), its true safety and effectiveness is difficult to validate. This same problem has also been brought up for the box-barrier enclosure design [25,26,27,28]. However, Figure 12 demonstrates only qualitatively the prevention of spreading of nebulized watery smoke by the plastic sheet in a mannequin model. The size of the COVID-19 virus is around 0.1 μm in diameter, while the size of the aerosols ranges widely, from sub-microns to hundreds of microns. To date, quantitative research into the aerosol flow dynamics with or without barrier is not available. Therefore, tracheal intubators still are required to wear adequate PPE for airway management for the at-risk AGMPs. While we are unable to quantify the exact amount of aerosols that might have escaped from under the drape, we can only emphasize the importance of the fact that the “seeing” stylet helps the operator to keep his/her face at a far distance from the patient’s mouth and droplets, hence greatly enhancing safety.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that the Shikani video-assisted intubating stylet technique with a plastic sheet barrier (together with proper PPE) is a safe and effective method for tracheal intubation during the Omicron and other COVID-19 variants pandemic. We also recommend this method of intubation for all AGMPs where the operator might be exposed to potentially infectious airborne germs, including influenza, tuberculosis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), HIV, hepatitis, Ebola and others.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare10061105/s1, Video S1: Intubation process in the case 1; Video S2: Intubation process in the case 2; Video S3: Intubation process in the Case 3; Video S4: Intubation process in the case 4; Video S5: Intubation process in the case 5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-N.L., J.Z.Q. and A.S.; methodology, H.-N.L., C.-H.H., I.-M.S. and B.-J.J.; validation, C.-H.H., I.-M.S. and B.-J.J.; formal analysis, H.-N.L.; investigation, H.-N.L.; resources, H.-N.L.; data curation, H.-N.L., C.-H.H., I.-M.S. and B.-J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-N.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Z.Q. and A.S.; visualization, H.-N.L., C.-H.H., I.-M.S. and B.-J.J.; supervision, H.-N.L.; project administration, H.-N.L.; funding acquisition, H.-N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by REC, Hualien Tzuchi Hospital (Approved letter number: CR111-05).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consents were obtained from the patients or their legally authorized representatives.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Supported by Hualien Tzuchi Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yao, W.; Wang, T.; Jiang, B.; Gao, F.; Wang, L.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, W.; Yao, S.; Mei, W.; Chen, X.; et al. Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: Lessons learnt and international expert recommendations. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, e28–e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brewster, D.J.; Chrimes, N.; Do, T.B.; Fraser, K.; Groombridge, C.J.; Higgs, A.; Humar, M.J.; Leeuwenburg, T.J.; McGloughlin, S.; Newman, F.G.; et al. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med. J. Aust. 2020, 212, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cook, T.M.; El-Boghdadly, K.; McGuire, B.; McNarry, A.F.; Patel, A.; Higgs, A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Zuo, M. Personal protective equipment during tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional survey. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, e420–e422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Du, Y.J.; Song, J.Q.; Wu, L.L.; Cheng, H.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.Y. Personal protective equipment provision amongst Chinese anaesthesia departments before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022, 128, e317–e320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Canelli, R.; Connor, C.W.; Gonzalez, M.; Nozari, A.; Ortega, R. Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1957–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rosenblatt, W.H.; Sherman, J.D. More on Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kovatsis, P.G.; Matava, C.T.; Peyton, J.M. More on Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Y.L.; Huang, C.H.; Luk, H.N.; Tsai, P.B. Adaptation to the plastic barrier sheet to facilitate intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth. Analg. 2020, 131, e97–e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luk, H.N.; Yang, Y.L.; Tsai, P.B. Application of plastic sheet barrier and video intubating stylet to protect tracheal intubators during Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic: A Taiwan experience. Cell Transplant. 2021, 30, 0963689720987527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsai, P.B.; Luk, H.N. Plastic sheet and video intubating stylet: A technical note. Asian J. Anesthesiol. 2021, 59, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Tsai, P.B.; Luk, H.N. Sheet barrier and intubating stylet. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, 1058–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stuempfig, N.D.; Toulouie, S.; Durant, E.J.; Nadir, N.A. Comparison of the characteristics of intubation airway barrier devices using a simulated airway task trainer. Cureus 2022, 14, e22817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shikani, A.H. New “seeing” stylet-scope and method for the management of the difficult airway. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1999, 120, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Levitan, R.M. Design rationale and intended use of a short optical stylet for routine fiberoptic augmentation of emergency laryngoscopy. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2006, 24, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsay, P.-J.; Yang, C.-P.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Video-Assisted intubating stylet technique for difficult intubation: A case series report. Healthcare 2022, 10, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, C.P.; Luk, H.N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. The use of a video-assisted intubating stylet technique in a critically ill and contagious COVID-19 patient. Healthcare 2022, 10, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.N.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Pender, M.; Wang, N.; Yan, F.; Ying, X.H.; Tang, S.L.; Fu, C.W. Reduction in healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e003421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pujolar, G.; Oliver-Anglès, A.; Vargas, I.; Vázquez, M.L. Changes in access to health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moynihan, R.; Sanders, S.; Michaleff, Z.A.; Scott, A.M.; Clark, J.; To, E.J.; Jones, M.; Kitchener, E.; Fox, M.; Johansson, M.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e045343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, S.; Glenn, S.; Sy, L.; Qian, L.; Hong, V.; Ryan, D.S.; Jacobsen, S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization in a large integrated health care system: Retrospective cohort study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e26558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Aziz, M.F.; Dillman, D.; Fu, R.; Brambrink, A.M. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012, 116, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Paolini, J.B.; Donati, F.; Drolet, P. Review article: Video-laryngoscopy: Another tool for difficult intubation or a new paradigm in airway management? Can. J. Anaesth. 2013, 60, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hansel, J.; Rogers, A.M.; Lewis, S.R.; Cook, T.M.; Smith, A.F. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 4, CD011136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Begley, J.L.; Lavery, K.E.; Nickson, C.P.; Brewster, D.J. The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: An in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wong, K.W.; Lam, R.P.K.; Sin, W.C.; Irwin, M.G.; Rainer, T.H. Comparison of the efficiency and usability of aerosol box and intubation tent on intubation of a manikin using personal protective equipment: A randomized crossover study. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 61, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Noor Azhar, M.; Bustam, A.; Poh, K.; Ahmad Zahedi, A.Z.; Mohd Nazri, M.Z.A.; Azizah Ariffin, M.A.; Md Yusuf, M.H.; Zambri, A.; Chong, J.Y.O.; Kamarudin, A.; et al. COVID-19 aerosol box as protection from droplet and aerosol contaminations in healthcare workers performing airway intubation: A randomised cross-over simulation study. Emerg. Med. J. 2021, 38, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saito, T.; Asai, T. Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: A narrative review. J. Anesth. 2021, 35, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surveillance data of COVID-19 in Taiwan. Two un-expected hits of this disease in Taiwan were noticed. (Time point A) The first hit occurred in May 2021 and was caused by the Alpha variant. There were 37,710 confirmed cases and 854 deaths; (Time point B) the second hit started in April 2022 caused by the Omicron variant (Data modified from the press release by the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, https://www.cdc.gov.tw/En; accessed on 6 June 2022).
Figure 1. Surveillance data of COVID-19 in Taiwan. Two un-expected hits of this disease in Taiwan were noticed. (Time point A) The first hit occurred in May 2021 and was caused by the Alpha variant. There were 37,710 confirmed cases and 854 deaths; (Time point B) the second hit started in April 2022 caused by the Omicron variant (Data modified from the press release by the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, https://www.cdc.gov.tw/En; accessed on 6 June 2022).
Healthcare 10 01105 g001
Figure 2. Preparation of the video-assisted intubating stylet, endotracheal tube, and a piece of manufactured plastic sheet. The technical note for preparation and specifications of the clear plastic sheet barrier can be found in the reference [11].
Figure 2. Preparation of the video-assisted intubating stylet, endotracheal tube, and a piece of manufactured plastic sheet. The technical note for preparation and specifications of the clear plastic sheet barrier can be found in the reference [11].
Healthcare 10 01105 g002
Figure 3. The simulation of applying the video-assisted intubating stylet technique in a mannequin covered with a clear plastic sheet over the head area and upper torso. The tracheal intubator was fully equipped with the PPE and kept a reasonably long distance away from the at-risk area of the mannequin. The technical note for preparation and specifications of the clear plastic sheet barrier can be found in the reference [11].
Figure 3. The simulation of applying the video-assisted intubating stylet technique in a mannequin covered with a clear plastic sheet over the head area and upper torso. The tracheal intubator was fully equipped with the PPE and kept a reasonably long distance away from the at-risk area of the mannequin. The technical note for preparation and specifications of the clear plastic sheet barrier can be found in the reference [11].
Healthcare 10 01105 g003
Figure 4. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) partial view of tongue and oral space; (C) pharyngeal space; (D) arytenoid cartilages; (E) glottic view with open vocal cords; (F) intra-tracheal space. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 8 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S1).
Figure 4. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) partial view of tongue and oral space; (C) pharyngeal space; (D) arytenoid cartilages; (E) glottic view with open vocal cords; (F) intra-tracheal space. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 8 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S1).
Healthcare 10 01105 g004
Figure 5. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) partial view of tongue and oral space; (C,D) pharyngeal space and epiglottis; (E) glottic view with open vocal cords; (F) intra-tracheal space. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 10 s. Copious saliva and bubbles, crowded pharyngeal space, and posteriorly displaced and relaxed epiglottis were noticed (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S2).
Figure 5. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) partial view of tongue and oral space; (C,D) pharyngeal space and epiglottis; (E) glottic view with open vocal cords; (F) intra-tracheal space. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 10 s. Copious saliva and bubbles, crowded pharyngeal space, and posteriorly displaced and relaxed epiglottis were noticed (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S2).
Healthcare 10 01105 g005
Figure 6. A patient was scheduled to receive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) due to pulmonary empyema. He had prior history of tongue cancer and had received surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. (A) Mouth-opening was about 3 cm with a grade 3 modified Mallampati test; (B) upper lip bite test, grade 3; (C) the head and neck displayed surgical scars, radiation fibrosis, and tracheostomy scar. MMT: Modified Mallampati Test. ULBT: Upper lip bite test.
Figure 6. A patient was scheduled to receive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) due to pulmonary empyema. He had prior history of tongue cancer and had received surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. (A) Mouth-opening was about 3 cm with a grade 3 modified Mallampati test; (B) upper lip bite test, grade 3; (C) the head and neck displayed surgical scars, radiation fibrosis, and tracheostomy scar. MMT: Modified Mallampati Test. ULBT: Upper lip bite test.
Healthcare 10 01105 g006
Figure 7. Tracheal intubation through a piece of plastic sheet barrier (The same patient as the one in Figure 6 and Figure 8).
Figure 7. Tracheal intubation through a piece of plastic sheet barrier (The same patient as the one in Figure 6 and Figure 8).
Healthcare 10 01105 g007
Figure 8. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry into oral cavity with identified uvula; (B) partial view of pharyngeal-laryngeal space and arytenoid cartilages; (C) vocal cords; (D) view inside the trachea. The tip of a suction tube was seen in (A,B). The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 7 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S3).
Figure 8. Various views displayed at the video monitor of the intubating stylet through a piece of plastic sheet barrier. (A) Entry into oral cavity with identified uvula; (B) partial view of pharyngeal-laryngeal space and arytenoid cartilages; (C) vocal cords; (D) view inside the trachea. The tip of a suction tube was seen in (A,B). The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 7 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S3).
Healthcare 10 01105 g008
Figure 9. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in the patient receiving double-lumen endobronchial tube insertion. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) localization of glottic area; (C) ready for railroading the tube into trachea. The pictorial and video demonstration can be found in Figure 10.
Figure 9. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in the patient receiving double-lumen endobronchial tube insertion. (A) Entry of oral cavity; (B) localization of glottic area; (C) ready for railroading the tube into trachea. The pictorial and video demonstration can be found in Figure 10.
Healthcare 10 01105 g009
Figure 10. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in the patient receiving double-lumen endobronchial tube insertion. (A) Entry into oral cavity and both the uvula and palates were seen; (B) localization of epiglottis; (C) glottic view with open vocal cords; (D) ready for railroading the tube into trachea. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 14 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S4).
Figure 10. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in the patient receiving double-lumen endobronchial tube insertion. (A) Entry into oral cavity and both the uvula and palates were seen; (B) localization of epiglottis; (C) glottic view with open vocal cords; (D) ready for railroading the tube into trachea. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 14 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S4).
Healthcare 10 01105 g010
Figure 11. Tracheal intubation using the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in a COVID-19 confirmed case for an emergency surgery. (A) Posteriorly displaced epiglottis; (B) obscured view by copious mucus; (C) full glottic view; (D) smooth insertion into tracheal lumen. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 12 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S5).
Figure 11. Tracheal intubation using the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier in a COVID-19 confirmed case for an emergency surgery. (A) Posteriorly displaced epiglottis; (B) obscured view by copious mucus; (C) full glottic view; (D) smooth insertion into tracheal lumen. The time for intubation (from lip to trachea) is 12 s (see also the video clip in the Supplementary Materials Video S5).
Healthcare 10 01105 g011
Figure 12. Protection from aerosol spreading contamination by video-assisted intubating stylet technique and a piece of plastic sheet barrier demonstrated in a mannequin. (A) Arrows in white color demarcate the area of simulated aerosol spreading; (B) with the coverage of a piece of plastic sheet as barrier during stylet intubation procedure, there was no aerosols detected which continuously spread under the plastic coverage.
Figure 12. Protection from aerosol spreading contamination by video-assisted intubating stylet technique and a piece of plastic sheet barrier demonstrated in a mannequin. (A) Arrows in white color demarcate the area of simulated aerosol spreading; (B) with the coverage of a piece of plastic sheet as barrier during stylet intubation procedure, there was no aerosols detected which continuously spread under the plastic coverage.
Healthcare 10 01105 g012
Table 1. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier for tracheal intubation during the Omicron pandemic (April 2022).
Table 1. Application of the Shikani technique and plastic sheet barrier for tracheal intubation during the Omicron pandemic (April 2022).
Case ACase B Case CCase DCase ECase FCase G Case HCase ICase J
Rapid antigen test/PCR testNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativePositivePositive
Surgery typeElectiveEmergentElectiveElectiveEmergentElectiveElectiveElectiveEmergentEmergent
Age/gender44/F35/M51/M51/M28/F74/M61/F37/M68/M39/M
Height (cm)/weight (kg);
(BMI, kg/m2)
159/81; 32.0175/76; 24.8166/66; 23.9169/70; 24.5160/59;
23.0
155/60
24.9
155/59;
24.5
170/65
22.4
157/69;
27.9
176/76; 24.5
First attempt successYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Number of attempt1111111111
Time to intubate8 s10 s7 s14 s6 s6 s7 s9 s43 s12 s
Laryngeal and glottic viewFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFull
Degree of difficulty for intubationEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyIn a spin #Easy *
Need to Require additional external maneuversNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Complications
(soft tissues or dental injuries)
NilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNil
Intubating deviceTTTTTTTTTT
Case KCase LCase MCase NCase OCase PCase QCase RCase SCase T
Rapid antigen test/PCR testNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
Surgery typeEmergentEmergentElectiveEmergentElectiveElectiveElectiveElectiveElectiveElective
Age/gender65/M53/F65/F30/F75/F88/F67/M57/F70/M52/M
Height (cm)/weight (kg);
(BMI, kg/m2)
164/99;
36.8
158/60;
24.0
153/59;
25.2
170/68;
23.5
160/80;
31.1
150/56;
24.8
169/76;
26.6
160/59; 23.0158/63;
25.2
168/82; 29.0
First attempt successYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Time to intubate (from lip to trachea)11 s6 s7 s8 s8 s7 s42 s42 s58 s6 s
Laryngeal & glottic viewFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFullFull
Degree of difficulty for intubationEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyEasyIn a spin In a spin In a spin Easy
Need to Require additional external maneuversNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Complications
(soft tissues or dental injuries)
NilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNil
Intubating deviceTTTTTTSSST
BMI: Body mass index (kg/m2). # Operated in the negative pressurized isolation room; difficulty jaw-thrusting due to oro-facial lesions; pharyngeal view obscured by blood, mucus and collapsed soft tissues; the first-year resident serving as the airway assistant. * Operated in the negative pressurized isolation room; poor jaw-thrusting initially; the third-year resident serving as the airway assistant. T: Video Intubation Light Stylet (Trachway, Markstein Sichtec Medical Corp., Taichung, Taiwan). S: C-MAC VS (Video Stylet) (KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany). The glottic view quality was judged by either the Cormack–Lehane grades or POGO scores. The degree of difficulty for intubation was evaluated subjectively and confirmed by reviewing the video-recording images. Post-operative sore throat (POST) and hoarseness were not evaluated in all the cases.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.-H.; Su, I.-M.; Jhuang, B.-J.; Luk, H.-N.; Qu, J.Z.; Shikani, A. Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105

AMA Style

Huang C-H, Su I-M, Jhuang B-J, Luk H-N, Qu JZ, Shikani A. Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare. 2022; 10(6):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Ching-Hsuan, I-Min Su, Bo-Jyun Jhuang, Hsiang-Ning Luk, Jason Zhensheng Qu, and Alan Shikani. 2022. "Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients" Healthcare 10, no. 6: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105

APA Style

Huang, C. -H., Su, I. -M., Jhuang, B. -J., Luk, H. -N., Qu, J. Z., & Shikani, A. (2022). Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients. Healthcare, 10(6), 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop