Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Programme in Adult Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The COSMIC Study Protocol
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Aim
1.2. Objectives
- (1)
- To implement the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) programme with an interdisciplinary Advisory Group including representatives from MindfulnessUK and KCUK for use with people with kidney disease.
- (2)
- To measure the effect of the CMR on anxiety, depression, self-compassion, mindfulness, wellbeing, and resilience using pre- and posttests.
- (3)
- To explore factors influencing the feasibility, acceptability, and suitability of the intervention with patients (and the Mindfulness Teacher) and their commitment to practice.
- (4)
- To develop strategies for sustainability of the programme once the study is completed via a Partnership Board including representatives from KCUK, MindfulnessUK, and Queen’s University Belfast.
2. Expert Advisory Group and Partnership Board
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
3.2. Participants
3.3. Preliminary Work
3.4. Participant Recruitment
3.5. Procedure of Data Collection
3.6. The Intervention
3.6.1. Who Is the CMR Course for?
3.6.2. CMR Resources for Participants
- (1)
- CMR Participants Resources Pack, either emailed or printed.
- (2)
- Downloadable Mindfulness and Compassion Meditation Practices.
- Compassionate body scan;
- Compassionate mindful movement;
- Affectionate Breathing.
- (3)
- A PowerPoint is used for some of the course content but not distributed to participants.
- (1)
- Have gained registration with the British Association of Mindfulness-Based Approaches as a qualified Mindfulness Teacher.
- (2)
- Have gained a Level 4 qualification ‘Integrating Mindfulness and Compassion in Professional Practice’.
- (3)
- Have qualified as a Compassion Teacher through the Centre for Mindful Self-Compassion.
3.7. Managing Risk
3.8. Data Collection
Measurements
- (a)
- Anxiety: The GAD-7 is a brief seven-item self-report scale based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for generalized anxiety disorder, with items scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). It has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.92) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.83) [41].
- (b)
- Depression: The PHQ-9 is a brief nine-item self-report scale based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for major depressive disorder, in which each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Similar to the GAD-7, construct validity studies have demonstrated its internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.87) to be excellent [42].
- (c)
- (d)
- The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is a self-report measure that is based on a five-facet model (i.e., Observe, Describe, Act with Awareness, Nonjudge, and Nonreact). The test consists of 39 items that measure the five facets, and the scores provide an estimate of where we stand in terms of mindfulness and self-awareness [45]. Results show that the Italian FFMQ (which has a similar factor structure to the English version) has good to excellent internal consistency as a whole (alpha = 0.86) with subscale consistency ranging from 0.65 to 0.81, and test–retest stability for the total score is 0.71 [46].
- (e)
- Tennant et al. [47] modified the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) into the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS). The SWEMWBS consists of seven positively worded items related to mental wellbeing, focusing on psychological and eudemonic wellbeing. It has been translated, validated, and used globally to evaluate levels of wellbeing in different populations, and has been used as an outcome measure for evaluations of interventions aimed at improving mental wellbeing. Robust measurement properties alongside brevity makes SWEMWBS preferable to WEMWBS for monitoring mental wellbeing. The scale is easily understood, practical, and inexpensive.
- (f)
- The Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ48), a self-report measure of mental toughness, and an accompanying model comprising 4 core components, challenge, commitment, control, and confidence, with responses graded on a 5-point Likert-type scale anchored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) [48]. It is the most widely used and researched resilience measure. The scale is currently being used in a number of mindfulness research studies at Queen’s University and Newcastle University. Whilst there remains debate regarding using MTQ48 in some areas, it can be viewed as the standard mental toughness measure to date with an overall test–retest coefficient of 0.90 [49,50].
3.9. Data Analysis
3.10. Sample Size
4. Qualitative Evaluation
4.1. Participant Recruitment
4.2. Data Collection and Management
4.3. Data Analysis
5. Dissemination Strategy
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hackett, M.L.; Jardine, M.J. We need to talk about Depression and Dialysis: But what questions should we ask, and does anyone know the answers? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murtagh, F.E.; Addington-Hall, J.; Higginson, I.J. The prevalence of symptoms in end-stage renal disease: A systematic review. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007, 14, 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pompili, M.; Venturini, P.; Montebovi, F.; Forte, A.; Palermo, M.; Lamis, D.A.; Serafini, G.; Amore, M.; Girardi, P. Suicide risk in dialysis: Review of current literature. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2013, 46, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Llana, H.; Remor, E.; Del Peso, G.; Selgas, R. The role of depression, anxiety, stress and adherence to treatment in dialysis patients’ health-related quality of life: A systematic review of the literature. Nefrologia 2014, 34, 637–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pena-Polanco, J.E.; Mor, M.K.; Tohme, F.A.; Fine, M.J.; Palvesky, P.M.; Weisbord, S.D. Acceptance of antidepressant treatment by patients on hemodialysis and their renal providers. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seekles, M.L.; Coyne, E.; Ormandy, P.; Wells, L.; Bevin, A.; Danbury-Lee, A. The UK Renal Psychosocial Workforce: A Mapping Exercise. 2018. Available online: https://www.kidneycareuk.org/news-and-campaigns/news/kidney-patients-lack-psychological-and-social-support/ (accessed on 10 April 2021).
- Wong, J.; Goh, Q.Y.; Tan, Z.; Lie, S.A.; Tay, Y.C.; Ng, S.Y.; Soh, C.R. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: A review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. Can. J. Anesth. 2020, 67, 732–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henry, B.M.; Lippi, G. Chronic kidney disease is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2020, 52, 1193–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kidney Care UK. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Guidance for Patients with Kidney Disease. 2020. Available online: https://www.kidneycareuk.org/news-and-campaigns/coronavirus-advice/ (accessed on 10 April 2021).
- Böhmert, M.; Kuhnert, S.; Nienhaus, A. Psychological stress and strain in dialysis staff—A systematic review. J. Ren. Care 2011, 37, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Strauss, C.; Bond, R.; Cavanagh, K. How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanh, T.N. The Miracle of Mindfulness: The Classic Guide to Meditation by the World’s Most Revered Master, Classic ed.; Rider: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kabat-Zinn, J.; Wheeler, E.; Light, T.; Skillings, A.; Scharf, M.J.; Cropley, T.G.; Hosmer, D.; Bernhard, J.D. Influence of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction intervention on rates of skin clearing in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing phototherapy (UVB) and photochemotherapy (PUVA). Psychosom. Med. 1998, 60, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kabat-Zinn, J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2003, 10, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saltzman, A.; Goldin, P. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for school-age children. In Acceptance and Mindfulness Treatments for Children and Adolescents: A Practitioner’s Guide; Greco, L.A., Hayes, S.C., Eds.; New Harbinger Publications: Oakland, CA, USA, 2008; Chapter 7; p. 139. [Google Scholar]
- Wolever, R.Q.; Bobinet, K.J.; McCabe, K.; Mackenzie, E.R.; Fekete, E.; Kusnick, C.A.; Baime, M. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2012, 17, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuelson, M.; Carmody, J.; Kabat-Zinn, J.; Bratt, M.A. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Massachusetts Correctional Facilities. Prison. J. 2007, 87, 254–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Psychological Association. Mindfulness Meditation: A Research-Proven Way to Reduce Stress. 2020. Available online: https://www.apa.org/topics/mindfulness/meditation (accessed on 5 May 2022).
- Kim, Y.H.; Kim, H.J.; Ahn, S.D.; Seo, Y.J.; Kim, S.H. Effects of mediation on anxiety, depression, fatigue, and quality of life of women undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer. Complement. Ther. Med. 2013, 21, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carlson, L.E.; Doll, R.; Stephen, J.; Faris, P.; Tamagawa, R.; Drysdale, E.; Speca, M. Randomised controlled trial of Mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3119–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luders, E.; Cherbuin, N.; Kurth, F. Forever Young(er): Potential age-defying effects of long-term meditation on gray matter atrophy. Front. Psychol. 2015, 5, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keng, S.; Smoski, M.J.; Robins, C.J. Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 31, 1041–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bower, J.E.; Crosswell, A.D.; Stanton, A.L.; Crespi, C.M.; Winston, D.; Arevalo, J.; Ma, J.; Cole, S.W.; Ganz, P.A. Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: A randomised controlled trial. Cancer 2015, 121, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zgierska, A.; Rabago, D.; Chawla, N.; Kushner, K.; Koehler, R.; Marlatt, A. Mindfulness mediation for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Subst. Abus. 2009, 30, 266–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kubo, A.; Kurtovich, E.; McGinnis, M.A.; Aghaee, S.; Altschuler, A.; Quesenberry, C., Jr.; Kolevska, T.; Avins, A.L. A randomized controlled trial of mHealth mindfulness intervention for cancer patients and informal cancer caregivers: A feasibility study within an integrated health care delivery system. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1534735419850634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuo, B.; Bhasin, M.; Jacquart, J.; Scult, M.A.; Slipp, L.; Riklin, E.I.; Lepoutre, V.; Comosa, N.; Norton, B.; Dassatti, A.; et al. Genomic and clinical effects associated with a relaxation response mind-body intervention in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keyworth, C.; Knopp, J.; Roughley, K.; Dickens, C.; Bold, S.; Coventry, P. A mixed-methods pilot study of the acceptability and effectiveness of a brief meditation and mindfulness intervention for people with diabetes and coronary heart disease. J. Behav. Med. 2014, 40, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ball, E.; Newton, S.; Kahan, B.C.; Forbes, G.; Wright, N.; Calvete, C.C.; Gibson, H.; Rogozinska, E.; Rivas, C.; Taylor, S.J.C.; et al. Smartphone App Using Mindfulness Meditation for Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain (MEMOHIS): Protocol for a Randomized Feasibility Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2018, 7, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sohn, B.K.; Oh, Y.K.; Choi, J.S.; Song, J.; Lim, A.; Lee, J.P.; An, J.N.; Choi, H.J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Jung, H.Y.; et al. Effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy with mindfulness in end-stage renal disease hemodialysis patients. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 37, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, Z.; Novak, M.; Platas, S.G.T.; Gautier, M.; Holgin, A.P.; Fox, R.; Segal, M.; Looper, K.J.; Lipman, M.; Selchen, S.; et al. Brief mindfulness meditation for depression and anxiety symptoms in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A pilot feasibility study. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 2008–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moosavi Nejad, M.; Shahgholian, N.; Samouei, R. The effect of mindfulness program on general health of patients undergoing hemodialysis. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, P.; Ngo, T.; Kalife, C.; Schiller, B. Improving wellbeing in patients undergoing dialysis: Can meditation help? Semin. Dial. 2018, 31, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igarashi, N.S.; Karam, C.H.; Afonso, R.F.; Carneiro, F.D.; Lacerda, S.S.; Santos, B.F.; Kozasa, E.H.; Rangel, E.B. The effects of a short-term meditation-based mindfulness protocol in patients receiving hemodialysis. Psychol. Health Med. 2022, 27, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assarian, F. Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction in Hemodialysis Patients with Anxiety and Depression: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Electron. Physician 2021, 11, 7370–7377. Available online: http://medtech.ichsmt.org/index.php/EPJ/article/view/690 (accessed on 26 January 2022).
- Carver, J.A.; Cheung, K.L. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Yogic Breathing/Mindfulness Meditation e-Intervention on Symptoms and COVID-19—Associated Anxiety in Patients Receiving Dialysis. J. Palliat. Med. 2021, 24, 1124–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bluth, K.; Neff, K.D. New frontiers in understanding the benefits of self-compassion. Self Identity 2018, 17, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, K. Compassionate Mindful Inquiry in Therapeutic Practice; Singing Dragon: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Compassionate Mindful Resilience|Mindfulness UK. 2021. Available online: https://mindfulnessuk.com/course/compassionate-mindful-resilience/ (accessed on 31 January 2022).
- British Association of Mindfulness-Based Approaches. 2022. Available online: https://bamba.org.uk/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
- Spitzer, R.L.; Kroenke, K.; Williams, J.B.; Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kemppainen, V.; Kerttu, T.; Hannele, T. Nurses’ roles in health promotion practice: An integrative review. Health Promot. Int. 2013, 28, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Raes, F.; Pommier, E.; Neff, K.D.; Van Gucht, D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2011, 18, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baer, R.A.; Smith, G.T.; Likins, E.; Button, D.; Krietemeyer, J.; Sauer, S.; Walsh, E. Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples. Assessment 2008, 15, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giovannini, C.; Giromini, L.; Bonalume, L.; Tagini, A.; Lang, M.; Amadei, G. The Italian five facet mindfulness questionnaire: A contribution to its validity and reliability. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2014, 36, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tennant, R.; Hiller, L.; Fishwick, R.; Platt, S.; Joseph, S.; Weich, S.; Parkinson, J.; Secker, J.; Stewart-Brown, S. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2007, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Perry, J.; Clough, P.; Crust, L.; Earle, K.; Nicholls, A. Factorial validity of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2013, 54, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clough, P.; Earle, K.; Sewell, D. Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. In Solutions in Sport Psychology; Thomson: London, UK, 2002; pp. 32–46. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.; Mutz, J.; Clough, P.; Papageorgiou, K. Mental Toughness and Individual Differences in Learning, Educational and Work Performance, Psychological Well-being, and Personality: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kounali, D.; Button, K.S.; Lewis, G.; Gilbody, S.; Kessler, D.; Araya, R.; Duffy, L.; Lanham, P.; Peters, T.J.; Wiles, N.; et al. How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care. Psychol. Med. 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stoop, C.H.; Nefs, G.; Pommer, A.M.; Pop, V.J.M.; Pouwer, F. Effectiveness of a stepped care intervention for anxiety and depression in people with diabetes, asthma or COPD in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 184, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meyerowitz-Katz, G.; Ravi, S.; Arnolda, L.; Feng, X.; Maberly, G.; Astell-Burt, T. Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Med. Internet. Res. 2020, 22, e20283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, C.; Evans, D.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Hu, Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Tang, J.; Kuang, Z. The effects of cognitive behavioural therapy on depression and quality of life in patients with maintenance haemodialysis: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, R.B.; Onwuegbuzie, A.J.; Turner, L.A. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2007, 1, 112–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivankova, N.V.; Creswell, J.W.; Stick, S.L. Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods 2006, 18, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glasgow, R.E.; Vogt, T.M.; Boles, S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am. J. Public Health 1999, 89, 1322–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Forman, J.; Heisler, M.; Damschroder, L.J.; Kaselitz, E.; Kerr, E.A. Development and application of the RE-AIM QuEST mixed methods framework for program evaluation. Prev. Med. Rep. 2017, 6, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polkinghorne, D.E. Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. J. Couns. Psychol. 2005, 52, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guest, G.; Bunce, A.; Johnson, L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006, 18, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riger, S.T.; Sigurvinsdottir, R.A. Thematic analysis. In Handbook of Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wilson, A.; McKeaveney, C.; Carswell, C.; Atkinson, K.; Burton, S.; McVeigh, C.; Graham-Wisener, L.; Jääskeläinen, E.; Johnston, W.; O’Rourke, D.; et al. Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Programme in Adult Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The COSMIC Study Protocol. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081387
Wilson A, McKeaveney C, Carswell C, Atkinson K, Burton S, McVeigh C, Graham-Wisener L, Jääskeläinen E, Johnston W, O’Rourke D, et al. Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Programme in Adult Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The COSMIC Study Protocol. Healthcare. 2022; 10(8):1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081387
Chicago/Turabian StyleWilson, Anna, Clare McKeaveney, Claire Carswell, Karen Atkinson, Stephanie Burton, Clare McVeigh, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Erika Jääskeläinen, William Johnston, Daniel O’Rourke, and et al. 2022. "Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Programme in Adult Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The COSMIC Study Protocol" Healthcare 10, no. 8: 1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081387
APA StyleWilson, A., McKeaveney, C., Carswell, C., Atkinson, K., Burton, S., McVeigh, C., Graham-Wisener, L., Jääskeläinen, E., Johnston, W., O’Rourke, D., Reid, J., Rej, S., Walsh, I., McArdle, M., & Noble, H. (2022). Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of the Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Programme in Adult Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The COSMIC Study Protocol. Healthcare, 10(8), 1387. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081387