Next Article in Journal
Interactions between Metabolic Syndrome, MASLD, and Arterial Stiffening: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Resilience on Post-Traumatic Growth among Nurses in COVID-19-Designated Hospitals: The Mediating Effect of Meaning in Life
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Impact of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction on Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Patients in Saudi Arabia—A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Exploratory Study of Psychological Distress, Professional Quality of Life, Effort-Reward Imbalance, and Turnover Intention of Hospital Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Healthcare 2023, 11(19), 2695; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192695
by Suk-Jung Han 1,*, Soon-Youl Lee 2 and Sie-Eun Kim 2
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2023, 11(19), 2695; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192695
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 2 October 2023 / Accepted: 6 October 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burnout and Mental Health among Health Professionals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a well presented and useful article. I have only minor suggestions for revision.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

My only issue is regarding the apparent interchange between the words 'empathy' and 'compassion'. See my notes in the text of the article about this.

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. Please find the detailed responses below and the corresponding revisions/corrections highlighted/in track changes in the re-submitted files

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, the paper is sound and deserves to be published. However, some aspects should be improved:

page 2 (line 44): The meaning of the score 3.79 is not clear.

page 2 (line 60): When the authors refer to the ERI model, does this mean that this is the model you are using for the analysis in the paper?

The variables which are defined in the Introduction are not totally clear, in my opinion. For instance, is “empathy satisfaction” the same as “compassion satisfaction”?

Another example is “empathy fatigue”, which is said to be categorized as both burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Which categorization is used in this paper? Please, clarify this point. 

Despite this vagueness in the Introduction, the method is clear and the results are well exposed in my opinion.  

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. Please find the detailed responses below and the corresponding revisions/corrections highlighted/in track changes in the re-submitted files

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop