Next Article in Journal
Assessing and Improving Provider Knowledge for a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit Electronic Dashboard Initiative
Next Article in Special Issue
A Retrospective Analysis Comparing VATS Cost Discrepancies and Outcomes in Primary Lung Cancer vs. Second Primary Lung Cancer Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Awareness and Practices of Food Safety among Food Service Catering Staff in Riyadh City Hospitals during the Coronavirus Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Disability Status on Mortality in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Study Focusing on Regional Disparities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emotional Problems, Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Chordoma

1
Neurosurgical Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing 102218, China
2
Beijing Neurosurgery Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
3
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
4
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
5
Brain Tumor Center, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(8), 1135; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081135
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 14 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Healthcare Disparities)

Abstract

:
Chordomas are very rare malignant bone tumors. Following surgery, their effects on neurological, physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning are substantial and can have a major impact on a patients’ quality of life (QOL). In this survey, we aimed to characterize the postoperation health-related QOL and emotional problem in patients with chordoma using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD). The cohort included 100 patients who underwent resection surgery between 2014 and 2020. Being single or divorced, living in a rural area, receiving a diagnosis of sacrococcygeal chordoma, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≤ 70, and weight loss were associated with increased likelihood of depression (p < 0.05). Patients who were single or divorced, with KPS ≤ 70, and experiencing weight loss had a higher likelihood of a worse QOL (p < 0.05). The uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that the KPS level (p = 0.000) and postoperative radiation therapy (p = 0.009) were related to depression; marital status (p = 0.029), KPS level (p = 0.006), and tumor location (p = 0.033) were related to worse QOL. Certain characteristics placed patients with chordoma at increased risk of emotional problems, which are associated with a lowered QOL and a higher symptom burden. Further knowledge regarding emotional problems is key to improving the QOL for patients with chordoma.

1. Introduction

Chordoma is a rare bone cancer (0.8 cases per 1 million population/year) that is aggressive and locally invasive and has a poor prognosis [1]. Most chordomas (~95%) involve the axial skeleton, with the skull base, vertebral bodies, and sacrococcygeal bones affected in roughly equal proportions [2]. The incidence of chordoma varies by sex and race according to the United States Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data, including more women and more people who are White, occurring earlier in life in skull base tumors [3]. Salvage therapy is challenging because of its relentless nature and refractoriness to adjuvant therapies, related to the deep-seated location of the tumor and its close proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Age at diagnosis, primary site, disease stage, surgical treatment, and tumor size are significantly associated with the prognosis of skull base chordoma [4]. Currently, chordomas are optimally managed with aggressive surgery that preserves key structures and postoperative radiation by a multidisciplinary team [5]. High-dose radiation therapy is recommended to lower the risk of recurrence [6]. To date, neurosurgeons and scientists have mainly focused on the molecular signaling pathway of and the targeted therapy for chordoma, the surgical treatment of chordoma, and the optimization of radiotherapy and immunotherapy of chordoma [7].
Cancer is often life-threatening, disfiguring, and unpredictable; hence, cancer can undermine a patient’s basic and often positive beliefs and expectations about themselves, their future, and their social relationships [8]. Patients with chordoma commonly experience multiple simultaneous symptoms of varying severity that impact their quality of life (QOL). The poor prognosis and the symptom burden resulting from chordoma therapy often bring the burden on the patients to the forefront. QOL is a multidimensional perspective that includes physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions. Changes in one QOL dimension can influence perceptions in other dimensions [9]. QOL has been established as an important concept and target for research and practice in the fields of health and medicine [10]. QOL plays an important role in improving overall survival in patients with malignant tumors [11,12]. The problems revealed by patients lead to modifications and improvement in treatment and care or may show that some therapies offer little benefit. At present, there are few papers focusing on the QOL of patients with spinal chordoma [13,14]. In one study conducted in the United States, researchers found that patients with chordoma had worse anxiety and pain scores compared with the national average. Additionally, patients with recurrent or residual chordoma reported worse QOL, anxiety, and depression compared with patients with primary chordoma. However, the knowledge of postoperative emotional distress and QOL in patients with skull base chordoma is still insufficient.
In this study, we evaluated the emotional problems, QOL, and symptom burden of 100 patients with chordoma, as well as the predictive factors and correlation between emotional problems, QOL, and clinical features in these patients. The specific aim was to identify predictors of QOL, which may serve as future targets for interventions to improve QOL in this chordoma population.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

We consecutively enrolled 100 patients with chordoma from June 2015 to June 2021. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18–65 years; (2) pathological results showing chordoma and brachyury (+); (3) life expectancy >12 months; (4) able to independently complete the QOL questionnaire. The exclusion criteria were: (1) severe dysphagia; (2) breast-feeding or pregnant women; (3) unstable heart disease; (4) renal failure or history of eating disorder; (5) dementia, psychosis, or impaired physical mobility; (6) history of depression. The mean follow-up period of this study was 65 (range, 15–87) months. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal representatives of all the patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the doctor-administered clinical assessments were completed by two trained psychiatrists. Eligible candidates self-reported no current pharmacotherapy for depression at the trial screening. Additional eligibility requirements included being medically stable with no uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions; having no personal or family history (first or second degree) of psychotic or bipolar disorders; and, for women, being nonpregnant, being non-nursing, and agreeing to use contraception.
In this study, 124 patients were enrolled, including 122 baseline assessments, and 2 were found to be ineligible due to prescreen HAM-D. In total, 100 completed 12-month questionnaires were received: 8 dropped out, 13 were lost to follow-up, and 1 declined clinician assessment. The participants were not paid for their involvement in the study. The study period was from June 2015 to June 2021, which included the COVID-19 pandemic, which created considerable barriers to follow-up.

2.2. Emotional Assessments

The Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD), a version of the 24-item questionnaire, was used by blinded researchers at the 12-month follow-up visit after surgery. The instrument measures somatic and affective symptoms of depression. Each item is scored for severity on a scale of 0–2 or 0–5 points, with a higher score reflecting higher symptom severity. The staff conducting the consensus diagnoses were blinded to the HAMD scores of the participants. To ensure the consistency and reliability of the scores throughout the study, two psychiatrists received training on the use of HAMD before the study. The criterion for major depressive disorder was classified as follows: no depression, score 0–7; mild, score 8–20; moderate, score 21–35; severe, score ≥36.

2.3. QOL Assessments

The Chinese version of the quality-of-life score 30, version 3.0, of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer was used in this study. The questionnaire was composed of 30 items related to functional status (15 questions, including physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), global health status (2 questions), and symptoms (13 questions) regarding the respondent’s last week. The QOL was self-assessed by the patients, and the standard scores of 0 to 100 were converted using the original score for each part of the instrument. In this study, a higher score generally indicated a better status or functioning; however, a higher score on the symptom domain indicated a worse condition. Each questionnaire package began with a page of questions about demographic and health characteristics and whether the patients were receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The measurement data are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD) or as numbers (percentage). Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical data. Continuous data were evaluated as to whether they met assumptions of the parametric statistical tests. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the participant characteristics and different index scores. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with depression or QOL. Differences correlating to an error of probability p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

Of the respondents, 64 were men and 36 were women; they were aged 42.7 ± 3.7 years (range 18–64); 87 were married, and the remainder included single (6 patients) and divorced (7 patients) individuals. The educational level was: 16 patients, <6 years; 25 patients, 6–9 years; 21 patients, 10–12 years; 38 patients, >12 years. A total of 44 patients lived in urban areas, and 56 lived in rural areas. In total, we noted 64 primary and 36 recurrent tumors. The score on the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 84.59 ± 1.98, ranging from 30 to 100, with 33 patients scoring ≤70 and 67 patients scoring >70. Of the tumors, 21 were located in the sacrococcygeal region and 79 in the skull base, as shown in Table 1.

3.2. Disease Characteristics Related to Emotional Problems

The HAMD score of the 100 patients with chordoma was 14.2 ± 2.3; 33 patients were categorized as having depression (Table 2). We observed a tendency for a gradual increase in the HAMD score with education level (F = 5.423, p = 0.004). The likelihood of depression was higher in patients with sacrococcygeal than in those with skull base tumors (13/21 vs. 20/79, p = 0.002). The likelihood of depression was higher in single or divorced patients than in married patients (8/12 vs. 25/88, p = 0.021), although we found no significant difference in HAMD score (p > 0.05). The patients with depression were more likely to have a KPS ≤ 70 (25/33 vs. 8/67, p = 0.000), weight loss (15/33 vs. 13/67, p = 0.002), or to be living in rural areas (22/33 vs. 34/67, p = 0.030) than those without depression.
As shown in Table 3, the results of uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the KPS (B = −0.124, SE = 0.030, and p = 0.000) and postoperation radiation therapy (B = 2.55, SE = 0.982, p = 0.009) were related to depression. In addition, being single or divorced (r = 0.235, p = 0.019), having a low education level (r = −0.201, p = 0.045), being diagnosed with a sacrococcygeal tumor (r = 0.317, p = 0.001), and experiencing recurrence (r = 0.361, p = 0.000) were associated with increased likelihood of having depression and worse QOL, whereas KPS correlated with a lower likelihood of depression and a better QOL (r = 0.627, p = 0.000).

3.3. Disease Characteristics Related to QOL and Symptoms

The self-evaluation score of chordoma patients was 51.38 ± 4.61. The highest score on the functional scales occurred for social functioning, following by role functioning and physical, and the lowest score was for emotional functioning. The patients reported that physical fatigue was the symptom of most concern, followed by appetite loss and chronic pain.
Based on the score for QOL, the patients were divided into three groups: QOL < 40; 40 ≤ QOL ≤ 60 and QOL > 60 (Table 4). We found that there was more likelihood of QOL < 40 in single or divorced patients (p = 0.015), and in those with KPS < 70 (p = 0.016), weight loss (p = 0.015) or sacrococcygeal chordoma (p = 0.000).
Uni- and multi-variable logistic regression analysis suggested that marital status (B = 1.584, SE = 0.723, p = 0.029), KPS level (B = −0.038, SE = 0.014, p = 0.006) and tumor location (B = 1.298, SE = 0.608, p = 0.033) were related to worse QOL (Table 5). In addition, there was positive correlation of QOL with KPS (r = 0.394, p = 0.000), and negative correlation of QOL with marital status (r = −0.218, p = 0.029) and tumor location (r = −0.208, p = 0.038).

4. Discussion

Chordomas usually have the characteristics of being locally aggressive and causing chronic pain, although they grow relatively slowly and are localized [15]. In addition, clinical symptoms of chordoma depend on the lesion location [16]. Skull base chordomas often present with headaches, dysphagia or bucking caused by cranial nerve palsies, and even hemiplegia [17]. Mobile spine or sacral chordomas often result in chronic back pain or urinary/bowel dysfunction due to nerve root compression [7,18]. There is little research on postoperative management of chordomas, although they show relatively poor prognosis [19]. In this study, we focused on the emotional problems, QOL, and symptom burden in patients with chordomas. Uni- and multi-variable logistic regression analysis showed that marital status, tumor location, postoperative radiation therapy and KPS were the independent risk factors for depression or poor QOL. We hope our findings provided the opportunity to offer a tailored strategy for the negative mood of patients with chordomas.
Depression is indicated by a depressive mood, slow thinking, and loss of interest [20]. The poor recognition of depression is associated with reduced quality of life and survival [21]. Depression affects up to 20% and anxiety up to 10% of patients with cancer, compared with 5% and 7% for past-year prevalence in the general population, respectively [22]. Chordoma is a clinically and histologically unique malignant neoplasm, and treatment options have largely been centered on surgical excision, with marginal results [23]. The strategies used for diagnosis and treatment of chordomas are frequently accompanied by changes in physical status and function, unpleasant side effects, and impaired social relationships. In this study, we found that more than 30% of patients with chordoma experienced emotional problems, and depression. The likelihood of depression occurring was higher in single or divorced patients than in married patients, in those living in rural rather than urban areas, in those with KPS ≤ 70, weight loss, and sacrococcygeal rather than skull base chordomas. Patients with chordomas suffer from negative emotions under chronic psychological stress. The emotional elements of postoperation survival are commonly mentioned by patients with chordoma and their family members. This population-based, cross-sectional study assessing emotional questions among patients with chordoma showed that elderly, single or divorced patients, and patients with recurrence, KPS ≤ 70, or education <12 years reported an increased likelihood of depression. Patients with a higher level of education were less fatalistic and showed less avoidance. We suspect that somatosensory abnormalities after the completion of treatment also caused emotional problems in patients with chordoma. Unexpectedly, we found no difference in the prevalence of depression among the different age groups, and the risk of depression in patients with recurrence was not higher than that in patients with the primary disease. The results of uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that KPS and postoperative radiation therapy were independent risk factors of depression in patients with chordoma.
A higher score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 correlated with better physical, role, emotional, and social functioning in patients with chordoma. Our findings indicated that QOL is determined by marital status, KPS, postoperative weight loss, and tumor location. Additionally, we found no significant difference in patient QOL for the different age groups and education levels. The highest score on the functional scales in patients with chordoma occurred for social functioning, following by role and physical functioning, and the lowest score was obtained for emotional functioning. Role functioning considers an individual as physical within their age and social setting [24]. Social and physical activity levels reduce after cancer diagnosis and rarely return to baseline levels following treatment completion [25]. The results of uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that marital status, KPS, and tumor location were independent factors related to postoperative QOL in patients with chordoma.
Clinically relevant emotional problems were present in more than half of all patients with head and neck cancer and dysphagia; furthermore, there was also a significant negative correlation between the presence of aspiration and emotional problems [26]. In this study, cerebrospinal fluid leak was the most common complication after surgery, followed by neurologic disorders including dysphagia or bucking, and chronic pain. No notable improvement in preoperative symptoms occurred in patients with chordoma except for reducing the tumor compression or bulk. Furthermore, no remarkable improvement in depression or QOL was noted after postoperative radiation therapy in our study. At present, no medical therapy options are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for advanced chordoma, and surgical resection of chordoma has high morbidity with prolonged recovery and complications. Although this radiotherapy can reduce the tumor recurrence rate, it does not improve postoperative symptoms; therefore, the patient’s postoperative depression is not substantially improved despite the radiotherapy received. Nevertheless, we agree that systemic therapy and intensive postsurgical treatment are needed in patients with chordoma. Simultaneously, interest remains high in exploring future treatments to improve quality of life while maintaining the disease control rates of radiation and surgery combined.
Over the most recent decade, many efforts have been devoted to prioritizing the generation of useful chordoma cell lines and tumor models, which have provided information on this malignancy and facilitated efficacious drug discovery [27,28]. At present, survivors of chordoma struggle with the after-effects, post-treatment complications, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, which can considerably diminish their quality of life. Among the 16 randomized trials of interventions targeting the caregiver, the caregiver–patient dyad, or the patient and their family for patients with advanced cancer, the most promising results showed improvements in depression resulting from early palliative care interventions [29]. Psychotherapy, medication, or combination therapy are all treatments that control and improve depressive symptoms. Other management methods, such as sleep management, exercise, and a healthy diet, are also important. Pharmacotherapy combined with psychotherapy is more effective for people with depression than pharmacotherapy alone, and psychotherapy increases adherence to pharmacotherapy. For mild depression, evidence-based studies have shown that psychotherapy should be adopted first, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy [30,31]. All these interventions have the potential to play a role in the treatment of postoperative depressive states in patients with chordoma. Patients and multidisciplinary teams should demand information related to all the treatment modalities and their side effects and should use self-care strategies to reduce them.
The peak of chordoma incidence occurs at 40–60 years, and the age of the participants in this study was relatively younger. In addition, the group included few sacrococcygeal cases and no pyramidal cases. In China, these two tumors are essentially treated by orthopedics, so multidepartment cooperation in chordoma research can provide more confirmation evidence. In addition, though binary logistic regressions may help with data presentation, notably in tables, categorization is unnecessary for statistical analysis and has some serious drawbacks compared with multivariate regression analysis. The absence of older patients (age 65–80 years) was also a problem in this study.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the postoperative emotional problems and QOL among patients with chordoma and to determine the risk factors that affect the QOL score. Certain characteristics, including being single or divorced, being diagnosed with sacrococcygeal chordoma, and having a KPS ≤ 70, place patients with chordoma at increased risk of experiencing emotional problems, which are associated with a reduced QOL and larger symptom burden. Our results may help researchers, providers, and care team members to better understand and treat the complex QOL needs in this population. Further knowledge regarding emotional problems will be key to improving the QOL of patients with chordoma.

Author Contributions

Validation, G.Y.; Formal analysis, X.Y. and Y.Z.; Investigation, C.L., H.Z., G.W. (Guoqin Wang) and L.J.; Resources, Y.Z.; Data curation, G.Y., S.G. and H.G.; Writing—original draft, Y.W.; Writing—review & editing, G.W. (Guihuai Wang) and J.B.; Visualization, H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z171100001017199).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (16149-0110).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the laboratory technicians, data collectors, and medical editors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Walcott, B.P.; Nahed, B.V.; Mohyeldin, A.; Coumans, J.-V.; Kahle, K.T.; Ferreira, M.J. Chordoma: Current Concepts, Management, and Future Directions. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, e69–e76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zambo, I.; Veselý, K. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone 2013: The main changes compared to the 3rd edition. Ceskoslovenska Patol. 2014, 50, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zuckerman, S.L.; Bilsky, M.H.; Laufer, I. Chordomas of the Skull Base, Mobile Spine, and Sacrum: An Epidemiologic Investigation of Presentation, Treatment, and Survival. World Neurosurg. 2018, 113, e618–e627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Teng, C.; Yang, Q.; Xiong, Z.; Ye, N.; Li, X. Multivariate Analysis and Validation of the Prognostic Factors for Skull Base Chordoma. Front. Surg. 2021, 8, 764329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Campbell, R.G.; Prevedello, D.M.; Ditzel Filho, L.; Otto, B.A.; Carrau, R.L. Contemporary Management of Clival Chordomas. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2015, 23, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Imai, R.; Kamada, T.; Araki, N. Working Group for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Sacral Chordoma: An Analysis of 188 Cases. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2016, 95, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, J.; Huang, R.; Yin, H.; Song, D.; Meng, T. Research Hotspots and Trends of Chordoma: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 946597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mikrut, E.E.; Panjwani, A.A.; Cipollina, R.; Revenson, T.A. Emotional Adjustment among Parents of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: The Influence of Social Constraints on Cognitive Processing and Fear of Recurrence. J. Behav. Med. 2020, 43, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jitender, S.; Mahajan, R.; Rathore, V.; Choudhary, R. Quality of Life of Cancer Patients. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2018, 12, 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haraldstad, K.; Wahl, A.; Andenæs, R.; Andersen, J.R.; Andersen, M.H.; Beisland, E.; Borge, C.R.; Engebretsen, E.; Eisemann, M.; Halvorsrud, L.; et al. A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Research in Medicine and Health Sciences. Qual. Life Res. 2019, 28, 2641–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rettig, E.M.; D’Souza, G.; Thompson, C.B.; Koch, W.M.; Eisele, D.W.; Fakhry, C. Health-Related Quality of Life before and after Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey Linkage. Cancer 2016, 122, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gotay, C.C.; Kawamoto, C.T.; Bottomley, A.; Efficace, F. The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schwab, J.H.; Janssen, S.J.; Paulino Pereira, N.R.; Chen, Y.L.E.; Wain, J.C.; DeLaney, T.F.; Hornicek, F.J. Quality of Life after Resection of a Chordoma of the Mobile Spine. Bone Jt. J. 2017, 99, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. van Wulfften Palthe, O.D.R.; Janssen, S.J.; Wunder, J.S.; Ferguson, P.C.; Wei, G.; Rose, P.S.; Yaszemski, M.J.; Sim, F.H.; Boland, P.J.; Healey, J.H.; et al. What Questionnaires to Use When Measuring Quality of Life in Sacral Tumor Patients: The Updated Sacral Tumor Survey. Spine J. 2017, 17, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. McCain, M.A. Chordoma in a Chronic Pain Patient. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1985, 66, 457–458. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Whelan, J.S.; Davis, L.E. Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Chordoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Asioli, S.; Zoli, M.; Guaraldi, F.; Sollini, G.; Bacci, A.; Gibertoni, D.; Ricci, C.; Morandi, L.; Pasquini, E.; Righi, A.; et al. Peculiar Pathological, Radiological and Clinical Features of Skull-Base de-Differentiated Chordomas. Results from a Referral Centre Case-Series and Literature Review. Histopathology 2020, 76, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bjornsson, J.; Wold, L.E.; Ebersold, M.J.; Laws, E.R. Chordoma of the Mobile Spine. A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 40 Patients. Cancer 1993, 71, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chang, C.; Tang, K.; Gao, Y.; Dai, J.; Dai, C. Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Chordoma from 2000 to 2020. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0279181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, Y.; Brietzke, E.; Cao, B.; Chen, Y.; Linnaranta, O.; Mansur, R.B.; Cortes, P.; Kösters, M.; Majeed, A.; Tamura, J.K.; et al. Development and Implementation of Guidelines for the Management of Depression: A Systematic Review. Bull. World Health Organ. 2020, 98, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liss, D.T.; Uchida, T.; Wilkes, C.L.; Radakrishnan, A.; Linder, J.A. General Health Checks in Adult Primary Care: A Review. JAMA 2021, 325, 2294–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pitman, A.; Suleman, S.; Hyde, N.; Hodgkiss, A. Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Cancer. BMJ 2018, 361, k1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ulici, V.; Hart, J. Chordoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2022, 146, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gamper, E.-M.; Petersen, M.A.; Aaronson, N.; Costantini, A.; Giesinger, J.M.; Holzner, B.; Kemmler, G.; Oberguggenberger, A.; Singer, S.; Young, T.; et al. Development of an Item Bank for the EORTC Role Functioning Computer Adaptive Test (EORTC RF-CAT). Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Guinan, E.M.; Bennett, A.E.; Doyle, S.L.; O’Neill, L.; Gannon, J.; Foley, G.; Elliott, J.A.; O’Sullivan, J.; Reynolds, J.V.; Hussey, J. Measuring the Impact of Oesophagectomy on Physical Functioning and Physical Activity Participation: A Prospective Study. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Weschenfelder, W.; Gast-Froehlich, S.; Spiegel, C.; Vogt, M.; Hofmann, G.O. Factors Influencing Quality of Life, Function, Reintegration and Participation after Musculoskeletal Tumour Operations. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krebbers, I.; Simon, S.R.; Pilz, W.; Kremer, B.; Winkens, B.; Baijens, L.W.J. Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancer: Dysphagia and Affective Symptoms. Folia Phoniatr. Logop. 2021, 73, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al Shihabi, A.; Davarifar, A.; Nguyen, H.T.L.; Tavanaie, N.; Nelson, S.D.; Yanagawa, J.; Federman, N.; Bernthal, N.; Hornicek, F.; Soragni, A. Personalized Chordoma Organoids for Drug Discovery Studies. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabl3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Walker, R.L.; Hornicek, F.J.; Duan, Z. Advances in the Development of Chordoma Models for Drug Discovery and Precision Medicine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2022, 1877, 188812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alam, S.; Hannon, B.; Zimmermann, C. Palliative Care for Family Caregivers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malhi, G.S.; Mann, J.J. Depression. Lancet 2018, 392, 2299–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics of 100 patients with chordoma.
Table 1. Characteristics of 100 patients with chordoma.
FeaturesTumor Locationp Values
Skull Base (n = 79)Sacrococcygeal
(n = 21)
Sex 0.190
Male4816
Female315
Age category (years) 0.155
18–596113
≥60188
Marital status 0.097
Married7116
Single or divorced85
Education (years) 0.080
<697
6–9205
9–12201
≥12308
Living area 0.540
Urban368
Rural4313
KPS 0.000 ***
≤701716
>70625
Primary/recurrence 0.094
Primary5210
Recurrence2511
Weight loss 0.024 *
Yes1810
No6111
Postoperation radiation 0.651
Yes4210
No3711
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Table 2. Characteristics of 100 patients with chordoma.
Table 2. Characteristics of 100 patients with chordoma.
FeatureDepressionp Values
Yes (n = 33)No (n = 67)
Sex 0.806
Male2243
Female1124
Age category (years) 0.097
18–592153
≥601214
Marital status 0.019 *
Married2562
Single or divorced85
Education (years) 0.247
<697
6–9817
9–12714
≥12929
Living area 0.030 *
Urban1143
Rural2234
KPS 0.000 ***
≤70258
>70859
Primary/recurrence 0.348
Primary1945
Recurrence1422
Weight loss 0.006 **
Yes1513
No1854
Tumor location
Skull base20590.002 **
Sacrococcygeal138
Postoperation radiation 0.135
Yes2131
No1234
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Uni- and multivariate logistic analysis of factors associated with depression.
Table 3. Uni- and multivariate logistic analysis of factors associated with depression.
CatelogUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
OR (95%CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Age0.269 (0.065–1.109)0.069----
Sex0.369 (0.072–1.875)0.229----
Education level0.541 (0.198–1.475)0.23----
Living area0.513 (0.064–4.095)0.529----
Marital status5.76 (0.754–43.97)0.091----
Disease time1.215 (0.454–3.248)0.699----
Tumor location0.862 (0.114–6.535)0.886----
Weight loss *0.392 (105–1.473)0.166----
Radiation therapy9.427 (1.331–66.79)0.02510.861 (2.122–55.60)0.004
KPS0.859(0.798–0.926)0.000 0.884 (0.841–0.930)0
Primary/Recurrence1.896 (0.503–7.145)0.345----
* defined as more than 5% weight loss.
Table 4. Associations between patient characteristics and QOL.
Table 4. Associations between patient characteristics and QOL.
FeaturesQOL p Values
<40 (n = 22)40–60 (n = 49)>60 (n = 29)
Gender 0.262
Male153415
Female71514
Age category 0.780
18–59153722
≥607127
Marital status 0.015 *
Married154626
Single or Divorced733
Education (year) 0.228
<6754
6–96910
9–123153
≥1262012
Living area 0.401
Urban72413
Rural152516
KPS 0.016 *
≤701094
>70124025
Primary/Recurrence 0.788
Primary143020
Recurrence8199
Weight loss 0.016 *
Yes11134
No113625
Tumor location
Skull base11460.000 ***
Sacrococcygeal114523
Postoperation radiation 0.411
Yes142613
No82316
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Table 5. Uni- and multi-variable logistic analysis of factors associated with QOL.
Table 5. Uni- and multi-variable logistic analysis of factors associated with QOL.
Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
OR (95%CI)p ValueOR (95%CI)p Value
Age0.559 (0.204–1.534)0.259----
Gender0.868 (0.245–3.073)0.826----
Education level0.637 (0.284–1.428)0.273----
Living area1.045 (0.177–6.159)0.961----
Marital status 4.904 (1.069–22.50)0.041 * 4.875 (1.181–20.13)0.029 *
Disease time0.624 (0.261–1.494)0.290----
Tumor location4.104 (1.032–16.32)0.045 * 3.662 (1.112–12.05)0.033 *
Weight loss0.736 (0.285–1.899)0.526----
Radiation therapy1.896 (0.514–6.990)0.337----
KPS0.953(0.921–0.985)0.005 **0.963 (0.937–0.989)0.006 **
Primary/Recurrence0.854 (0.233–3.129)0.811----
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Jing, L.; Yi, G.; Yang, X.; Gui, S.; Gao, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Emotional Problems, Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Chordoma. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081135

AMA Style

Wu Y, Li C, Zhang H, Wang G, Jing L, Yi G, Yang X, Gui S, Gao H, Zhang Y, et al. Emotional Problems, Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Chordoma. Healthcare. 2023; 11(8):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Youtu, Chuzhong Li, Huifang Zhang, Guoqin Wang, Linkai Jing, Guo Yi, Xuejun Yang, Songbai Gui, Hua Gao, Yazhuo Zhang, and et al. 2023. "Emotional Problems, Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Chordoma" Healthcare 11, no. 8: 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081135

APA Style

Wu, Y., Li, C., Zhang, H., Wang, G., Jing, L., Yi, G., Yang, X., Gui, S., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, G., & Bai, J. (2023). Emotional Problems, Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Patients with Chordoma. Healthcare, 11(8), 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop