Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Arabic Coffee and Black Tea in Reducing Halitosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Integrated Neuromuscular Exercise in Physical Education Class on Health-Related Fitness in Female Children
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Self Perceived Malocclusion on the Oral Health Related Quality of Life of Young Adults
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/healthcare9030249
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults

by
Doowon Lee
,
Ju-Yeon Son
,
Hyo-Myeong Ju
,
Ji-Hee Won
,
Seung-Bo Park
and
Woo-Hwi Yang
*
Graduate School of Sports Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam-si 13503, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2021, 9(3), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030249
Submission received: 26 January 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 21 February 2021 / Published: 1 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promotion of Health and Exercise)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exercise is recommended to increase physical health and performance. However, it is unclear how low-intensity exercise (LIE) of different durations may affect or improve recovery ability. This study aimed to investigate how LIE-duration with the same volume affects recovery ability in adults. Twenty healthy male adults participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to the 30-min (n = 10) or the 1-h LIE group (n = 10). The intervention included sixteen exercise sessions/four weeks with a 30-min LIE group, and eight exercise sessions/four weeks with a 1-h LIE group. Heart rate (HR) corresponding to <2 mmol∙L−1 blood lactate (La−) was controlled for LIE. Pre- and post-testing was conducted before and after 4-week LIE and tests included jogging/running speed (S), HR, and differences (delta; ∆) in HR and S between pre- and post-testing at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−. Only the HR at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 30-min LIE group was decreased in the post-test compared to the pre-test (p = 0.043). The jogging/running speed of the 1-h LIE group was improved in the post-test compared to the pre-test (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.002, respectively). ∆HR at 2.0 and ∆S between the 30-min and 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− were significantly different (p = 0.023, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.019, respectively). Furthermore, moderate to high positive correlations between ∆HR and ∆S of all subjects at 1.5 (r = 0.77), 2.0 (r = 0.77), and 4.0 (r = 0.64) mmol∙L−1 La− were observed. The 1-h LIE group showed improved endurance not only in the low-intensity exercise domain, but also in the beginning of the moderate to high-intensity exercise domain while the 30-min LIE group was not affected by the 4-week LIE intervention. Therefore, LIE (<2.0 mmol∙L−1) for at least 1-h, twice a week, for 4 weeks is suggested to improve recovery ability in adults.

1. Introduction

The goal of prescribed exercise is to improve physical health and performance in the general population and athletes [1,2]. Sports scientists and clinical physicians have used lactate threshold (LT) tests for over fifty years due to their application as a useful metric for recommendations on individualized exercise intensity in elite athletes and cardiac patients [3,4]. A rightward shift of the exponential lactate curve is generally interpreted as improved endurance performance [5,6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, the blood lactate level during exercise is a more sensitive biomarker of endurance performance than maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) [10]. Indeed, a recent study reports that non-exercise based maximal heart rate (HRmax) and VO2max equations are not suitable for individualized exercise prescription in the clinical setting [11].
Validated LT concepts such as anaerobic, aerobic–anaerobic threshold, maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), and the onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA; 4 mmol·L−1) were developed and refined by several groups [5,12,13,14,15,16]. However, some of these concepts have been controversial [9,14]. Despite several generally used definitions of the aerobic–anaerobic transition, this biochemical phenomenon does not actually exist because the glycolytic pathway is accelerated to supply adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for active skeletal muscles during increments in intense exercise [9,14,17].
Nowadays, the blood lactate level of the LT test is used to differentiate exercise intensity areas, which include low-intensity (<2 mmol·L−1; zone 1; LIE), moderate-intensity (2–4 mmol·L−1; zone 2; MIE), and high-intensity exercise (>4 mmol·L−1; zone 3; HIE) [9,15,18,19,20]. HIE induces dramatic effects on maximal aerobic performance, which is achievable through relatively short exercise times (volume). However, HIE may be unsuitable for exercise beginners and/or the general population with relatively poor endurance performance because it causes faster depletion of carbohydrates, stress on skeletal muscle, high risk of muscle injury, and dysbalance of hormones [21,22,23]. During MIE, carbohydrates and fat are used as the main energy sources and represent the predominant energy source under aerobic conditions [9,24,25]. Therefore, high exercise volumes at MIE are difficult for exercise beginners and the general population [9,24,25]. Previous studies have shown that threshold training produces the lowest effects of exercise compared to HIE, high volume training (HVT), and polarized training (POT) in athletes and obese women [19,26].
In comparison to HIE and MIE, fat oxidation is the predominant energy source used in LIE (<2 mmol·L−1) and LIE is commonly interpreted as recovery exercise zone [4,9]. In this regard, triglycerides in adipocytes are hydrolyzed into glycerol and free fatty acids (FFAs) that are converted into acetyl-CoA by beta-oxidation in the mitochondria [9,27,28]. In contrast, blood lactate values start to decrease in LIE as more pyruvate and lactate are utilized by the aerobic pathway than in anaerobic glycolysis [29]. However, the predominant activation of these mechanisms during exercise also seems to be dependent on exercise duration [9,24,30]. van Loon et al. [30] suggested that fat oxidation provided 66% of total energy demand at rest. Furthermore, FFAs and intracellular lipid during MIE contributed 48% and 17%, respectively. Other outcomes of previous studies have shown that LIE (40% of VO2max and 50%–60% of maximal heart rate) needs to be performed 4–6 h per week over 12 weeks in obese men, which improved fat metabolism [31,32]. This increased fat metabolism plays a crucial role in the physiological mechanisms to improve recovery ability because fat oxidation supports the Cori cycle in the liver and kidney (cell-to-cell lactate shuttle mechanism; re-synthesis) and influences the activation of key enzymes and hormonal responses of gluconeogenesis [9,27,33,34,35,36]. Hence, reduced blood lactate should be an indicator of the efficient use of fat oxidation and enhanced recovery during LIE. In particular, both elite athletes and the general population need to perform LIE in order to improve regenerative endurance, which consists of the ability to effectively perform fat oxidation and ATP re-synthesis [4,9].
However, based on the aforementioned scientific outcomes, it is unclear as to how the duration and frequency (volume) of individualized LIE (<2 mmol·L−1) impacts recovery ability in the general population because there are relatively fewer studies regarding LIE. Furthermore, previous studies have conducted different low-intensity exercises based on the percentages of estimated HRmax and VO2max. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate, using the LT test, how different exercise duration (30 min vs. 1 h) with the same exercise volume (4 weeks) affects recovery ability in adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A total of twenty healthy male adults (n = 20) participated in this study and they were recruited from regional fitness centers through official research notifications. Subjects were randomized to separate 30-min (n = 10) and 1-h LIE groups (n = 10). The anthropometric parameters of the subjects were as follows (mean ± SD): 30-min LIE group, age: 28.3 ± 2.0 years, height: 173.5 ± 4.4 cm, weight: 75.9 ± 9.9 kg, fat: 16.3 ± 3.9%, BMI: 25.1 ± 2.2 kg∙m2; 1-h LIE group, age: 28.8 ± 6.9 years, height: 173.4 ± 3.9 cm, weight: 75.4 ± 8.9 kg, fat: 17.7 ± 5.9%, BMI: 25.0 ± 2.3 kg∙m2 (pre- and post-intervention data in Table 1). All were had been involved in strength training for at least six months and the training volume was between 16–18 h per week. Subjects did not take any medication during all procedures and abstained from alcohol and nicotine consumption for four weeks of exercise intervention and at least 24 h before the experiment. Furthermore, subjects did not consume any liquid during all tests. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the CHA University (No. 1044308-202003-HR-007-02). The applied protocols align with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Study Design

In the study, two measurement points were scheduled for the 30-min and 1-h LIE groups (pre- and post-test; Figure 1). All procedures were conducted and controlled in the same laboratory environment throughout the experiment (temperature: 23 °C; relative humidity: 50%). All subjects were instructed not to alter their diet throughout the exercise phase and to maintain strength training if it was part of their usual exercise program. The nutritional intake of subjects was not controlled during the study, however, food intake was not allowed for a three-hour period before all testing [37]. Subjects completed an anthropometric measurement using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (Inbody 270; Inbody Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea), and the LT test [12,16] was performed on a treadmill (NR30XA, DRAX Corporation Ltd., Seoul, Korea). As an exercise control, HR assessment was monitored during each LIE session, and the results (exercise mod, duration, and intensity) were digitally saved in the associated HR application [37].

2.3. Intervention of Low-Intensity Exercise

To achieve the same exercise volume in the different intervention groups, the four weeks consisted of sixteen exercise sessions of 30-min LIE or eight exercise sessions of 1-h LIE. Four-week exercise interventions were selected based on previous studies and in order to study the effects of maintaining the same exercise volume [2,19,37,38]. Exercise intensity (LIE with heart rate (HR) corresponding to individualized <2 mmol∙L−1 blood lactate) was controlled by HR based on the LT test at the pre-test [18,19,26,37,39]. Percentages of estimated maximal heart rate were calculated [40] (Table 2).

2.4. Laboratory Pre- and Post-Test

The pre-test subjects performed an incremental exercise on a treadmill (LT test), which consisted of 5-min stages with 30 s breaks between stages. The first stage was started at 1.0 m∙s−1, with increments of 0.5 m∙s−1 every 5 min. The criteria for ending testing were a blood lactate concentration over 4 mmol∙L−1 after each running speed or until volitional exhaustion [12,16,37]. After four weeks of LIE, the same set-up was used for the post-test. HR and jogging/running speed at the 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 blood lactate concentration levels (La−) were estimated using a mathematical model of the interpolation that has previously been explained in detail [16,41,42,43]. Delta (∆) jogging/running speed and ∆HR at the 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− between pre- and post-testing were calculated (S1.5, S2, S4, ∆S1.5, ∆S2, ∆S4 and HR1.5, HR2, HR4, ∆HR1.5, ∆HR2, ∆HR4). The HR of all subjects was recorded using HR telemetry (H10 sensor, Polar Electro, Finland). The mean value of HR over the last 30 s of each stage was determined for statistical analysis. Capillary blood sampling for lactate analysis was taken from the earlobe (0.2 µL) immediately after each 5-min stage. All blood lactate levels were determined by an enzymatic-amperometric method (Lactate Scout 4, EKF-diagnostics GmbH, Germany) [44,45].

2.5. Statistical Analyses

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Parameters are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD)/standard error of the mean (S.E.M). Normal distribution was performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-test and post-test within each group. Furthermore, an independent t-test was utilized to compare the differences between the 30-min LIE and 1-h LIE groups. Box and whisker plots indicate minimum to maximum and median values. Effect sizes (ES; Cohen’s d) were calculated for parametric tests and thresholds for small, moderate, and large effects were 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively [46]. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01. Additionally, a Pearson’s two-tailed correlation was performed between ∆S and ∆HR at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of Pre- and Post-Test HR and Jogging/Running Speed of 30-min LIE Group

HR at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 30-min LIE group was decreased in the post-test compared to the pre-test (p = 0.043; ES: 0.66) (Figure 2). Other HR data at 1.5 and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− were not affected by the 30-min LIE intervention (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− showed no significant change between pre- and post-testing (p > 0.05).

3.2. Comparison of Pre- and Post-Test HR and Jogging/Running Speed of 1-h LIE Group

There was no significant difference in HR at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− between the pre- and post-test (p > 0.05). However, the jogging/running speed of the 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− was significantly increased post-intervention (p < 0.001; ES: 1.05, p = 0.006; ES: 0.86, p = 0.002; ES: 0.65, respectively). Data are presented in Figure 3A–C and Figure 4.

3.3. Comparison of HR, Jogging/Running Speed, ∆HR, and ∆Jogging/Running Speed between 30-min and 1-h LIE Group

Jogging/running speed and HR changes post-intervention at 2.0 and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− showed no differences between short and long exercise duration (p > 0.05). However, jogging speed at 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 1-h LIE group was significantly higher compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.004; ES: 1.47) (Figure 5A). Delta HR at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− and delta jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 1-h LIE were significantly higher compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.023; ES: 1.11, p < 0.001; ES: 1.85, p = 0.002; ES: 1.58, p = 0.019; ES: 1.16, respectively) (Table 3).

3.4. Correlations between ∆HR and ∆S of All Subjects at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol·L−1 La−

Moderate to high positive correlations between ∆HR and ∆S of all subjects at 1.5 (r = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50–0.90; r2 = 0.59; p < 0.0001), 2.0 (r = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.51–0.90; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.0001), and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (r = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.29–0.84; r2 = 0.42; p = 0.0019) were observed (Figure 6A–C).

4. Discussion

The effect of LIE-duration and frequency on recovery ability is currently controversial. Therefore, the present study examined how a different LIE-duration with the same exercise volume (4 × 4 weeks; 30-min LIE group and 2 × 4 weeks; 1-h LIE group) influences the recovery ability in male adults. The major findings show that jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 1-h LIE group was improved after the 4-week exercise intervention. Also, values of ∆HR2, ∆S1.5, ∆S2, and ∆S4 in the 1-h LIE group were significantly higher compared to the 30-min LIE group.
HR values showed only a decreased HR2.0 and ∆HR2.0 in the 30-min LIE group and between both groups, while no significant difference in jogging speed at 2 mmol∙L−1 La− was observed. HR levels of the 1-h LIE group were tended to increase with improved jogging/running speeds in the post-test, but no significant change was found. Indeed, our correlation analyses showed positive, moderate to high relationships between ∆HR and ∆S at certain lactate levels. (Figure 3 and Figure 6, and Table 3). Increased and decreased HR levels after 4-week LIE intervention may be caused by altered cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation [47,48,49]. However, these outcomes (tendency) should be considered with other HR-related parameters such as heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure, and HRmax in future studies. Accordingly, most earlier studies regarding LIE have been conducted in cardiac patients in which several parameters such as HRmax, HRV, and blood pressure were analyzed [50,51,52]. HRV was positively affected after five sessions of LIE per week for 12 weeks in patients with peripheral artery disease, which increased the parasympathetic activation [51]. Furthermore, patients with chronic heart failure and hypertension performed 3–5 sessions of 1-h LIE for 12 weeks (40% of VO2max and 40% of HRmax, respectively), which resulted in increased left ventricular ejection, decreased blood pressure, and HRV interval [50,52]. In this regard, LIE seems to influence the HR variables with a higher exercise volume of at least 4–5 sessions per week over 12 weeks.
Jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 30-min LIE group was not affected by the 4-week LIE intervention. In contrast, jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of the 1-h LIE group in the post-test was significantly enhanced (see Figure 3). The recommended HR of the 1-h LIE group was 62% of HRmax in our study (Table 2). Similarly, a previous study has reported that 40-min LIE (64% of HRmax) for four weeks in cardiac patients could increase the running speed corresponding to 4 mmol∙L−1 La− by 5% [2]. Furthermore, LIE in recreational runners (60%–70% of HRmax; 30–60 min; eight weeks) caused a reduction in accumulated blood lactate and rate of blood lactate production during the graded exercise test by 70% and 57%, respectively [53]. Another study has shown that POT that included over 80% LIE (<2 mmol·L−1; zone 1) after three weeks resulted in improved time to exhaustion by 5% and increased jogging speed at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− by 9% [37]. Hommel et al. [39] showed that healthy male adults increased the power in MLSS after 1-h LIE at 1.5 to 2.5 mmol∙L−1 La−, three days per week for 4 and 6 weeks. To improve endurance performance, the distribution of training intensity in world-class middle- and long-distance runners suggests over 87% of zone 1 (<2 mmol·L−1) per week from the general preparation phase [54].
Previous studies suggest that total fat utilization is increased while carbohydrate usage is decreased by endurance training [24,55,56,57]. Thus, it is understandable why the jogging/running speed of the 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− increased in the present study, which also indicates an improved rightward shift of the exponential lactate curve (Figure 4) [5,6,7,8,9,55,56,57]. In contrast, the jogging/running speed of the 30-min LIE group was not statistically different between pre- and post-testing. In light of this, LIE of 25% VO2max mainly induces delivery of plasma fatty acids for energy production, while the production of lactate is decreased for ATP re-synthesis [9,27,28].
Under resting and LIE conditions, fat and lactate metabolism is largely dependent on mitochondrial abundance and function [9,58]. During LIE, the resting lactate is predominantly transported via blood from muscle cells to the liver/kidney (Cori cycle) transport, which is supported by the increased hepatic blood flow. In contrast, lactate from muscle cells is resynthesized less by the intracellular lactate shuttle mechanism during LIE [9,59,60]. Furthermore, key enzymes and hormonal responses of gluconeogenesis such as pyruvate kinase, pyruvate carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, glucagon, cortisol, and other associated regulators such as cyclic adenosine monophosphate and intracellular calcium are activated by FFA [61,62,63,64,65]. In contrast, FFA inhibits glycolysis-related enzymes such as pyruvate dehydrogenase [9,61,62,63,64,65].
San-Millan et al. [66] and Yang et al. [9] have suggested that the general population has relatively poor recovery ability (lower fat oxidation and re-synthesis from lactate) compared to professional athletes during LIE. Also, these outcomes result in indirect aerobic conditions in different populations, which are associated with the aforementioned mechanisms in mitochondria. The high negative correlation between blood lactate and fat oxidation (r = −0.92–−0.98) are seen in different populations such as elite cyclists, moderately active male individuals, and individuals with metabolic syndrome [66]. Thus, the improved jogging/running speed at a different blood lactate concentration in the 1-h LIE group for 4 weeks can be interpreted as due to the increased utilization of fat and recovery ability in male adults. Maximal fat oxidation can be reached with a prolonged exercise duration of over 1-h at moderate intensity (65% of VO2max) [67]. Furthermore, the outcomes of van Loon et al. [30] showed that the highest total fat oxidation (FFA and intramyocellular lipids) in male cyclists during MIE occurred after 120 min. On the other hand, muscle glycogen decreased with increased duration. These results indicate that the absolute use of fat oxidation during LIE is relatively lower than during MIE. However, fat oxidation can predominantly be used during LIE because of the very low utilization of carbohydrates as an energy source and unnecessary carbohydrates can be efficiently saved [24,25]. Hence, LIE requires a longer exercise duration to achieve the efficient use of fat oxidation compared to MIE [9,24,25]. However, LIE of only 30-min duration for four weeks does not sufficiently improve metabolic flexibility, which reflects the ability to oxidize fat and carbohydrate, mitochondrial function, and oxidative capacity including fat oxidation. This is seen in our data (Figure 5 and Table 3) and also confirmed in previous studies [24,30].
Our findings indicate that 1-h LIE can improve fat oxidation and ATP re-synthesis, resulting in enhanced recovery ability and general aerobic endurance in adults. Further studies are expected to investigate how these metabolic changes are associated with 1-h LIE using other metabolic-related parameters such as respiratory exchange ratio and blood glucose.

5. Conclusions

The findings of the present study indicate that the 1-h LIE group improved endurance, not only in the low-intensity exercise domain but also in the beginning of the moderate to high-intensity exercise zones (zones 1, 2, and 3). Thus, LIE (<2.0 mmol∙L−1) for at least 1-h, twice a week, for 4 weeks is suggested to enhance recovery ability and endurance performance in adults. As well, LIE may be suitable not only for athletes but also pregnant women, exercise beginners, older adults and even cardiac patients, because of the very low propensity for muscle injury and cardiometabolic risk. Further studies are expected to investigate how the volume (duration and frequency) of LIE influences other specific populations such as older adults and cardiac patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and W.-H.Y.; methodology, D.L. and W.-H.Y.; formal analysis, D.L.; investigation, D.L., J.-Y.S., H.-M.J., J.-H.W.; data curation, D.L. and W.-H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L. and W.-H.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.-B.P. and W.-H.Y.; visualization, D.L. and W.-H.Y.; project administration, W.-H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the CHA University (No. 1044308-202003-HR-007-02). The applied protocols align with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions eg privacy or ethical. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy of CHA University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. MacInnis, M.J.; Gibala, M.J. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 2915–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kiviniemi, A.M.; Hautala, A.J.; Kinnunen, H.; Tulppo, M.P. Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 101, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Messias, L.H.D.; Polisel, E.E.C.; Manchado-Gobatto, F.B. Advances of the reverse lactate threshold test: Non-invasive proposal based on heart rate and effect of previous cycling experience. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Faude, O.; Kindermann, W.; Meyer, T. Lactate threshold concepts. Sports Med. 2009, 39, 469–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wasserman, K.; McIlroy, M.B. Detecting the threshold of anaerobic metabolism in cardiac patients during exercise. Am. J. Cardiol. 1964, 14, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yoshida, T.; Udo, M.; Chida, M.; Ichioka, M.; Makiguchi, K.; Yamaguchi, T. Specificity of physiological adaptation to endurance training in distance runners and competitive walkers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1990, 61, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Acevedo, E.O.; Goldfarb, A.H. Increased training intensity effects on plasma lactate, ventilatory threshold, and endurance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1989, 21, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bosquet, L.; Léger, L.; Legros, P. Methods to determine aerobic endurance. Sports Med. 2002, 32, 675–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yang, W.H.; Park, H.; Grau, M.; Heine, O. Decreased Blood Glucose and Lactate: Is a Useful Indicator of Recovery Ability in Athletes? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hill, A.; Lupton, H. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. QJM An. Int. J. Med. 1923, 16, 135–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peterman, J.E.; Harber, M.P.; Imboden, M.T.; Whaley, M.H.; Fleenor, B.S.; Myers, J.; Arena, R.; Kaminsky, L.A. Accuracy of Exercise-based Equations for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2021, 53, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mader, A. Zur beurteilung der sportartspezifischen ausdauerleistungsfahigkeit im labor. Sportarzt Sportmed 1976, 27, 80–88. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sjödin, B.; Jacobs, I.; Svedenhag, J. Changes in onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) and muscle enzymes after training at OBLA. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1982, 49, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wahl, P.; Manunzio, C.; Vogt, F.; Strütt, S.; Volmary, P.; Bloch, W.; Mester, J. Accuracy of a Modified Lactate Minimum Test and Reverse Lactate Threshold Test to Determine Maximal Lactate Steady State. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 3489–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jamnick, N.A.; Pettitt, R.W.; Granata, C.; Pyne, D.B.; Bishop, D.J. An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 1729–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heck, H.; Mader, A.; Hess, G.; Muecke, S.; Mueller, R.; Hollmann, W. Justification of the 4mmol/l lactate threshold. Int. J. Sports Med. 1985, 6, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gonzalez, J.T.; Fuchs, C.J.; Betts, J.A.; Van Loon, L.J. Liver glycogen metabolism during and after prolonged endurance-type exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 311, E543–E553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Treff, G.; Winkert, K.; Sareban, M.; Steinacker, J.M.; Sperlich, B. The Polarization-Index: A Simple Calculation to Distinguish Polarized From Non-polarized Training Intensity Distributions. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stöggl, T.L.; Sperlich, B. The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Barstow, T.J.; Casaburi, R.; Wasserman, K. O2 uptake kinetics and the O2 deficit as related to exercise intensity and blood lactate. J. Appl. Physiol. 1993, 75, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Katz, A.; Sahlin, K. Role of oxygen in regulation of glycolysis and lactate production in human skeletal muscle. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 1990, 18, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Parolin, M.L.; Chesley, A.; Matsos, M.P.; Spriet, L.L.; Jones, N.L.; Heigenhauser, G.J. Regulation of skeletal muscle glycogen phosphorylase and PDH during maximal intermittent exercise. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 277, E890–E900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vanhatalo, A.; Black, M.I.; DiMenna, F.J.; Blackwell, J.R.; Schmidt, J.F.; Thompson, C.; Wylie, L.J.; Mohr, M.; Bangsbo, J.; Krustrup, P.; et al. The mechanistic bases of the power-time relationship: Muscle metabolic responses and relationships to muscle fibre type. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 4407–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Romijn, J.A.; Coyle, E.F.; Sidossis, L.S.; Gastaldelli, A.; Horowitz, J.F.; Endert, E.; Wolfe, R.R. Regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 265, E380–E391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hargreaves, M.; Spriet, L.L. Skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zapata-Lamana, R.; Henríquez-Olguín, C.; Burgos, C.; Meneses-Valdés, R.; Cigarroa, I.; Soto, C.; Fernández-Elías, V.E.; García-Merino, S.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; García-Hermoso, A.; et al. Effects of Polarized Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Young Overweight and Obese Women: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Coyle, E.F. Substrate utilization during exercise in active people. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 968S–979S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bülow, J.; Madsen, J. Influence of blood flow on fatty acid mobilization from lipolytically active adipose tissue. Pflug. Arch. 1981, 390, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beneke, R.; Leithäuser, R.M.; Ochentel, O. Blood lactate diagnostics in exercise testing and training. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2011, 6, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. van Loon, L.J.; Koopman, R.; Stegen, J.H.; Wagenmakers, A.J.; Keizer, H.A.; Saris, W.H. Intramyocellular lipids form an important substrate source during moderate intensity exercise in endurance-trained males in a fasted state. J. Physiol. 2003, 553, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Van Aggel-Leijssen, D.P.; Saris, W.H.; Hul, G.B.; Van Baak, M.A. Long-term effects of low-intensity exercise training on fat metabolism in weight-reduced obese men. Metabolism 2002, 51, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. van Aggel-Leijssen, D.P.; Saris, W.H.; Hul, G.B.; van Baak, M.A. Short-term effects of weight loss with or without low-intensity exercise training on fat metabolism in obese men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Brooks, G.A. The lactate shuttle during exercise and recovery. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1986, 18, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Brooks, G.A. Current concepts in lactate exchange. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1991, 23, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Clore, J.N.; Glickman, P.S.; Helm, S.T.; Nestler, J.E.; Blackard, W.G. Evidence for dual control mechanism regulating hepatic glucose output in nondiabetic men. Diabetes Care 1991, 40, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, X.; Iqbal, N.; Boden, G. The effects of free fatty acids on gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis in normal subjects. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stöggl, T.; Sperlich, B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Stöggl, T.L. What is the best way to train to become a star endurance athlete. Front. Young Minds 2018, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hommel, J.; Öhmichen, S.; Rudolph, U.M.; Hauser, T.; Schulz, H. Effects of six-week sprint interval or endurance training on calculated power in maximal lactate steady state. Biol. Sport 2019, 36, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tanaka, H.; Monahan, K.D.; Seals, D.R. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Abel, T.; Burkett, B.; Schneider, S.; Lindschulten, R.; Strüder, H.K. The exercise profile of an ultra-long handcycling race: The Styrkeprøven experience. Spinal Cord 2010, 48, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zeller, S.; Abel, T.; Smith, P.M.; Strueder, H.K. Influence of noncircular chainring on male physiological parameters in hand cycling. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2015, 52, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quittmann, O.J.; Abel, T.; Zeller, S.; Foitschik, T.; Strüder, H.K. Lactate kinetics in handcycling under various exercise modalities and their relationship to performance measures in able-bodied participants. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 118, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bonaventura, J.M.; Sharpe, K.; Knight, E.; Fuller, K.L.; Tanner, R.K.; Gore, C.J. Reliability and accuracy of six hand-held blood lactate analysers. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2015, 14, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tanner, R.K.; Fuller, K.L.; Ross, M.L. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 109, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tulppo, M.P.; Mäkikallio, T.H.; Takala, T.E.; Seppänen, T.; Huikuri, H.V. Quantitative beat-to-beat analysis of heart rate dynamics during exercise. Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 271, H244–H252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rezk, C.C.; Marrache, R.C.; Tinucci, T.; Mion, D., Jr.; Forjaz, C.L. Post-resistance exercise hypotension, hemodynamics, and heart rate variability: Influence of exercise intensity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006, 98, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carter, J.B.; Banister, E.W.; Blaber, A.P. Effect of endurance exercise on autonomic control of heart rate. Sports Med. 2003, 33, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Malfatto, G.; Branzi, G.; Riva, B.; Sala, L.; Leonetti, G.; Facchini, M. Recovery of cardiac autonomic responsiveness with low-intensity physical training in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2002, 4, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Brenner, I.K.M.; Brown, C.A.; Hains, S.J.M.; Tranmer, J.; Zelt, D.T.; Brown, P.M. Low-Intensity Exercise Training Increases Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2020, 22, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hua, L.P.; Brown, C.A.; Hains, S.J.; Godwin, M.; Parlow, J.L. Effects of low-intensity exercise conditioning on blood pressure, heart rate, and autonomic modulation of heart rate in men and women with hypertension. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2009, 11, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beneke, R.; Hütler, M. The effect of training on running economy and performance in recreational athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2005, 37, 1794–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kenneally, M.; Casado, A.; Gomez-Ezeiza, J.; Santos-Concejero, J. Training intensity distribution analysis by race pace vs. physiological approach in world-class middle- and long-distance runners. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bergman, B.C.; Butterfield, G.E.; Wolfel, E.E.; Casazza, G.A.; Lopaschuk, G.D.; Brooks, G.A. Evaluation of exercise and training on muscle lipid metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, E106–E117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bergman, B.C.; Butterfield, G.E.; Wolfel, E.E.; Lopaschuk, G.D.; Casazza, G.A.; Horning, M.A.; Brooks, G.A. Muscle net glucose uptake and glucose kinetics after endurance training in men. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, E81–E92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bergman, B.C.; Wolfel, E.E.; Butterfield, G.E.; Lopaschuk, G.D.; Casazza, G.A.; Horning, M.A.; Brooks, G.A. Active muscle and whole body lactate kinetics after endurance training in men. J. Appl. Physiol. 1999, 87, 1684–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Brooks, G.A.; Mercier, J. Balance of carbohydrate and lipid utilization during exercise: The “crossover” concept. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994, 76, 2253–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Nielsen, H.B.; Clemmesen, J.O.; Skak, C.; Ott, P.; Secher, N.H. Attenuated hepatosplanchnic uptake of lactate during intense exercise in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 1677–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nielsen, H.B.; Febbraio, M.A.; Ott, P.; Krustrup, P.; Secher, N.H. Hepatic lactate uptake versus leg lactate output during exercise in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 103, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Flory, W.; Peczon, B.D.; Koeppe, R.E.; Spivey, H.O. Kinetic properties of rat liver pyruvate kinase at cellular concentrations of enzyme, substrates and modifiers. Biochem. J. 1974, 141, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Oh, K.-J.; Han, H.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Koo, S.-H. CREB and FoxO1: Two transcription factors for the regulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis. BMB Rep. 2013, 46, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Williamson, J.R. Mechanism for the stimulation in vivo of hepatic gluconeogenesis by glucagon. Biochem. J. 1966, 101, 11C. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Henning, H.; Stumpf, B.; Ohly, B.; Seubert, W. On the mechanism of gluconeogenesis and its regulation. 3. The glucogenic capacity and the activities of pyruvate carboxylase and PEP-carboxylase of rat kidney and rat liver after cortisol treatment and starvation. Biochem. Z. 1966, 344, 274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Jungas, R.L.; Halperin, M.L.; Brosnan, J.T. Quantitative analysis of amino acid oxidation and related gluconeogenesis in humans. Physiol. Rev. 1992, 72, 419–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. San-Millán, I.; Brooks, G.A. Assessment of Metabolic Flexibility by Means of Measuring Blood Lactate, Fat, and Carbohydrate Oxidation Responses to Exercise in Professional Endurance Athletes and Less-Fit Individuals. Sports Med. 2018, 48, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Bosma, M. Lipid droplet dynamics in skeletal muscle. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 340, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Healthcare 09 00249 g001 550
Figure 1. Study design (A) 30-min group: 4 sessions × 4 weeks of low-intensity exercise (<2 mmol∙L−1) (B) 1-h group: 2 sessions × 4 weeks of low-intensity exercise (<2 mmol∙L−1). The pre-test was conducted before the 4-week exercise intervention. After the 4-week exercise intervention, all subjects performed the post-test. LIE: low-intensity exercise.
Figure 1. Study design (A) 30-min group: 4 sessions × 4 weeks of low-intensity exercise (<2 mmol∙L−1) (B) 1-h group: 2 sessions × 4 weeks of low-intensity exercise (<2 mmol∙L−1). The pre-test was conducted before the 4-week exercise intervention. After the 4-week exercise intervention, all subjects performed the post-test. LIE: low-intensity exercise.
Healthcare 09 00249 g001
Healthcare 09 00249 g002 550
Figure 2. Heart rate (HR) at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of 30-min LIE group. During the post-test, HR at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− was decreased in comparison to the pre-test (p = 0.043). Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Heart rate (HR) at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of 30-min LIE group. During the post-test, HR at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− was decreased in comparison to the pre-test (p = 0.043). Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05.
Healthcare 09 00249 g002
Healthcare 09 00249 g003 550
Figure 3. Jogging/running speed data of 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−. Jogging/running speed was significantly improved at (A) 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La− (p < 0.001) (B) 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (p = 0.006) and (C) 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (p = 0.002). ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Jogging/running speed data of 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−. Jogging/running speed was significantly improved at (A) 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La− (p < 0.001) (B) 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (p = 0.006) and (C) 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (p = 0.002). ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Healthcare 09 00249 g003
Healthcare 09 00249 g004 550
Figure 4. Improved jogging/running speed of 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− was associated with an enhanced rightward shift of the exponential lactate curve and exercise intensity zone. Data are mean ± S.E.M.
Figure 4. Improved jogging/running speed of 1-h LIE group at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− was associated with an enhanced rightward shift of the exponential lactate curve and exercise intensity zone. Data are mean ± S.E.M.
Healthcare 09 00249 g004
Healthcare 09 00249 g005 550
Figure 5. Jogging speed at 1.5 and 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− between 30-min LIE and 1-h LIE groups. (A) In the post-test of the 1-h LIE group, jogging speed at 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La− was significantly increased compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.004). (B) Jogging speed at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− tended to increase in the 1-h LIE group compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.061). ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Jogging speed at 1.5 and 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− between 30-min LIE and 1-h LIE groups. (A) In the post-test of the 1-h LIE group, jogging speed at 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La− was significantly increased compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.004). (B) Jogging speed at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La− tended to increase in the 1-h LIE group compared to the 30-min LIE group (p = 0.061). ** p < 0.01.
Healthcare 09 00249 g005
Healthcare 09 00249 g006 550
Figure 6. Pearson’s two-tailed correlation (n = 20) between delta (∆) jogging/running speeds and delta (∆) heart rate at (A) 1.5 (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001), (B) 2.0 (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001), and (C) 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (r = 0.64, p = 0.0019).
Figure 6. Pearson’s two-tailed correlation (n = 20) between delta (∆) jogging/running speeds and delta (∆) heart rate at (A) 1.5 (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001), (B) 2.0 (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001), and (C) 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− (r = 0.64, p = 0.0019).
Healthcare 09 00249 g006
Table
Table 1. Anthropometric data at pre- and post-testing of 30-min low-intensity exercise (LIE) (n = 10) and 1-h LIE (n = 10) groups.
Table 1. Anthropometric data at pre- and post-testing of 30-min low-intensity exercise (LIE) (n = 10) and 1-h LIE (n = 10) groups.
Parameters30-min LIE Group (Mean ± SD)1-h LIE Group (Mean ± SD)
Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test
Age (years)28.3 ± 2.028.8 ± 6.9
Height (cm)173.5 ± 4.4173.4 ± 3.9
Body weight (kg)75.9 ± 9.976.1 ± 11.275.4 ± 8.975.7 ± 9.56
Body fat (%)16.3 ± 3.916.4 ± 4.317.7 ± 5.917.8 ± 6.3
BMI (kg∙m2)25.1 ± 2.225.2 ± 2.625.0 ± 2.325.1 ± 2.5
BMI: Body mass index. Anthropometric data was not significantly changed between pre- and post-testing of all groups.
Table
Table 2. Recommended heart rate, estimated maximal heart rate percentage, and corresponding jogging speed for low-intensity exercise (<2.0 mmol∙L−1).
Table 2. Recommended heart rate, estimated maximal heart rate percentage, and corresponding jogging speed for low-intensity exercise (<2.0 mmol∙L−1).
GroupHR (Beats∙min−1)% of HRmaxJogging Speed (m∙s−1)
30-min LIE group (n = 10)117 ± 1066.6 ± 8.711.50 ± 0.31
1-h LIE group (n = 10)127 ± 1662.2 ± 5.751.53 ± 0.14
HR: heart rate, LIE: low-intensity exercise, % of HRmax: estimated maximal heart rate percentages.
Table
Table 3. Delta HR and delta jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of 30-min LIE (n = 10) and 1-h LIE (n = 10) groups.
Table 3. Delta HR and delta jogging/running speed at 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La− of 30-min LIE (n = 10) and 1-h LIE (n = 10) groups.
Parameters30-min LIE Group% of 30-min G 1-h LIE Group% of 1-h GSignificanceEffect Size
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDpd
∆HR1.5 (beats∙min−1)−10.00 ± 19.35−5.20 ± 17.5612.30 ± 27.7214.99 ± 27.210.0520.93
∆HR2.0 (beats∙min−1)−9.20 ± 12.34−5.45 ± 8.799.20 ± 19.958.50 ± 16.580.023 *1.11
∆HR4.0 (beats∙min−1)−2.70 ± 7.31−1.38 ± 4.180.80 ± 9.650.65 ± 5.800.370.41
∆S1.5 (m∙s−1)−0.17 ± 0.45−6.76 ± 24.040.66 ± 0.4551.66 ± 44.01<0.001 ***1.85
∆S2.0 (m∙s−1)−0.09 ± 0.28−2.35 ± 14.200.52 ± 0.4629.03 ± 27.320.002 **1.58
∆S4.0 (m∙s−1)0.03 ± 0.34−1.93 ± 10.730.41 ± 0.2915.31 ± 11.360.019 *1.16
∆HR1.5: the difference in heart rate between pre- and post-test at 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La−, ∆HR2.0: the difference in heart rate between pre- and post-test at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La−, ∆HR4.0: the difference in heart rate between pre- and post-test at 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−, ∆S1.5: the difference in jogging speed between pre- and post-test at 1.5 mmol∙L−1 La−, ∆S2.0: the difference in jogging speed between pre- and post-test at 2.0 mmol∙L−1 La−, ∆S4.0: the difference in running speed between pre- and post-test at 4.0 mmol∙L−1 La−, % of 30-min G: percentage changes between pre- and post-test of 30-min LIE group, % of 1-h G: percentage changes between pre- and post-test of 1-h LIE group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, D.; Son, J.-Y.; Ju, H.-M.; Won, J.-H.; Park, S.-B.; Yang, W.-H. Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults. Healthcare 2021, 9, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030249

AMA Style

Lee D, Son J-Y, Ju H-M, Won J-H, Park S-B, Yang W-H. Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults. Healthcare. 2021; 9(3):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Doowon, Ju-Yeon Son, Hyo-Myeong Ju, Ji-Hee Won, Seung-Bo Park, and Woo-Hwi Yang. 2021. "Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults" Healthcare 9, no. 3: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030249

APA Style

Lee, D., Son, J. -Y., Ju, H. -M., Won, J. -H., Park, S. -B., & Yang, W. -H. (2021). Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults. Healthcare, 9(3), 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop