Next Article in Journal
Effect of UV Irradiation on the Growth of ZnO:Er Nanorods and Their Intrinsic Defects
Next Article in Special Issue
Macrocyclic Compounds Comprising Tris(3-Aminopropyl)Amine Units and Fluorophore Moieties: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Studies in the Presence of Metal Salts
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Pulse Voltammetric Detection of Acetaminophen Using Nickel Phthalocyanine/CeO2-Modified ITO Electrodes
Previous Article in Special Issue
New ICT-Based Ratiometric Two-Photon near Infrared Probe for Imaging Tyrosinase in Living Cells, Tissues, and Whole Organisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Self-Immobilizing Quinone Methides for the Fluorescent Sensing of Enzyme Activity

1
Chemical Biology Research Group, Institute of Organic Chemistry, ELKH Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok Krt 2, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
2
Hevesy György PhD School of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/a., H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2023, 11(3), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11030155
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fluorescence Sensing)

Abstract

:
Gaining insight into biological processes relies on sensitive analytical techniques. These often require labeling of biomolecules that help visualize them. Selective covalent labeling without preliminary modification of the biomolecules is an advantageous method. For example, this can be achieved by using probes that are capable of in situ quinone methide (QM) formation. The QM can be masked to give a stable precursor, and the highly reactive form is only generated upon activation by a specific trigger. The in situ formed QM then binds covalently to the nucleophilic side chains of either the target protein or a protein in close proximity. Using fluorogenic probes further improves this method by reducing non-specific background signals, thus improving signal-to-noise ratios. In this review we summarize the development of quinone methide-based probes from mechanism-based inactivation to red-emitting, fluorogenic activity probes, focusing on enzyme-triggered activation.

1. Introduction

Targeted covalent modification of biomolecules using small molecules in biological media has gained ground in the last decades [1,2,3,4,5]. The most often used reactions between exogenous electrophiles and biological nucleophiles to label and/or alter the function of the target molecule are nucleophilic substitutions and Michael additions [6]. Owing to the variety of nucleophiles present in biological media, using reactive electrophiles can lead to non-specific reactions. One of the possibilities to avoid non-specific ligation with biomolecules is the masking of reactive functional groups. This blocked compound shows no reactivity towards either targets or off-target molecules until the reactive form is generated in situ by a trigger effect. One straightforward approach to accomplish controlled masking and targeted release is the application of quinone methides (QMs) [7].
QMs can be characterized as quinone analogues in which one of the carbonyl oxygens is replaced by a methylene group. Both 1,2-QMs (ortho-QMs) and 1,4-QMs (para-QMs) display significant electrophilic reactivity (Figure 1a) that can be explained with their zwitterionic aromatic valence bond resonance structure [8]. The rarely-encountered meta-derivative is also possible, however, it exhibits higher instability than its isomers [9]. The formation of azaquinone methides is also feasible if the oxygen of the quinone methide function is replaced by nitrogen (Figure 1a). Despite their high reactivity, the QMs can be blocked in the form of a stable precursor. In this precursor, the phenolic oxygen is substituted by a recognizable unit, while the methylene group of the QM is masked with an adequate leaving group. As a result of a trigger—in biological media mostly enzymatic activity, a biological analyte, or reactive oxygen species (ROS)—both the recognizable unit and the leaving group are cleaved from the molecule, generating the QM in situ (Figure 1b). The formed QM is rapidly attacked by a nucleophilic moiety, usually amino and thiol groups or water.
The aim of this review is to demonstrate the versatility of compounds utilizing the quinone methide function. We focused on sensing and monitoring enzyme activity with mechanism-based enzyme inhibition and enzyme activity-based probes for many enzyme classes, including phosphatases, glycosidases, sulfatases, and β-lactamases, emphasizing the importance of selective fluorescent labeling. We first showed the early application of QMs for enzyme inhibition, then the utilization of fluorescent labeling and signaling of enzyme activity. The structure of the probes is highly modular, and we hope that this review will help researchers to choose the best combination of trigger, leaving group, and fluorophore that best suits their intended use. We also comment on the possible future applications of QMs in the conclusion to widen the scope of labeling enzymes and possibly other biomolecules of interest.

2. Enzyme Inhibition

The first published examples of achieving enzyme inhibition with QMs date back to the 1970s and 1980s, although these early implementations utilize chloride as a leaving group leading to the generation of QMs [10,11,12]. Although the application of the highly reactive benzylchlorides may run the risk of non-specific alkylation and inhibition of biomolecules, these results paved the way for the biological utilization of QMs.
In search of a selective enzyme activated inhibitor for glycosidases, Halazy and coworkers replaced the chloride leaving group with the more stable fluoride inspired by their previously reported acyl fluoride generating 1,1-difluoroalkyl glucosides [13]. The combination of QMs with the milder reactivity of fluorine-containing compounds led to the synthesis of ortho- and para-(difluoromethyl)aryl-β-glucosides providing the first target-selective enzyme inhibition utilizing QM chemistry (Figure 2) [14]. Upon β-glucosidase catalyzed hydrolysis, the molecule decomposes to glucose and the corresponding fluorinated phenol derivative. The latter compound loses hydrogen fluoride, and the reactive QM motif is obtained, attaching itself covalently to the nucleophilic active center (Figure 2). It was shown that the hydrolysis rate of ortho- and para-difluoromethyl substituted glucosides was comparable, and that the incorporation of electron withdrawing alkoxy groups to the molecule yielded slightly decreased cleavage reaction rates.
Wakselman and coworkers applied nitrobenzyl derivatives that, upon bioreduction, generated aza-QMs (“quinonimide methides”) [15]. Although their original goal was the liberation of carboxylic acids, they state that the formed aza-QMs can alkylate DNA or other biomolecules, contributing to the antitumor effect. A later work focused more on the direct effect of aza-QMs in trypsin-like serine protease inhibition [16]. Here, the latent aza-QM was incorporated to a functionalized cyclopeptide and was generated with the cleavage of bromide and sulfide leaving groups. Myers and Widlanski described the first phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) inhibitor of such kind [17], aiming for better understanding of tumor suppression by blocking human prostatic acid (PAP) with 4-(fluoromethyl)phenyl phosphate (FMPP). The effect of nucleophilic scavenging agents for inactivation was also examined, proving that the excess of neither cysteine, sodium azide, nor dithiothreitol affected the process negatively. The difluoro-analogue of this inhibitor, 4-(difluoromethyl)phenyl phosphate, was described by Wang and coworkers at the same time [18]. This difluorinated derivative is believed to be more stable in aqueous media, which is consistent with the slower t1/2 measured for PAP inactivation. Although FMPP displayed good inactivation rates, its properties were far from ideal: inactivation was shown not only towards PAP enzyme [19], and it was also limited by its instability in water and buffers. To improve these factors, Myers and coworkers developed their inhibitor further by introducing a nitro-group to the 2-position [20]. The obtained 4-fluoromethyl-2-nitrophenyl phosphate, despite being the substrate of PAP, did not result in the inactivation of the enzyme due to the improved stability, but the modification allowed the change of the leaving group from fluoride to the more active chloride and bromide. The mechanism-based inhibition of glucosamine 6-phosphate synthase (GlmS) was also carried out for the first time with l-γ-glutamyl-2-[((p-difluoromethyl)phenyl)thio]glycine to investigate the antibacterial and antifungal activity of its glutamine site-directed inhibitors [21]. Another thio-QM-based idea abolished the enterococci resistance to vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic used in therapy [22,23], by inhibiting the activity of VanX protein, a d-alanyl-d-alanine dipeptidase. However, the achieved inactivation efficiency was low.
After designing several suicide inhibitors for enzymes, the focus was on expanding the application range of these inactivator properties. The selective trigger-induced, in situ-generated reactive species and the subsequent covalent ligation is an ideal basis for the construction of combinatorial chemical systems [24,25,26,27,28].

3. Activity-Based Probes

As it was shown, mechanism-based inactivators, also called as suicide inhibitors, are activated in situ as a result of the enzyme activity that is wished to be blocked. The generated reactive QM alkylates the active site of the enzyme, thus inactivating it. Activity probes work on the same basis, but with a different aim: in this case, the covalent modification does not necessarily occur on the active site. The focus is on preserving spatial information, thus not letting the probe diffuse away from the proximity of the enzyme. This feature makes the activity probes suitable for highly specific labeling purposes without the need for protein modification. Up to now, several enzymes, such as phosphatases, glycosidases, hydrolases, and proteases, were studied this way.

3.1. Phosphatases

Protein phosphatases are responsible for protein dephosphorylation, that is, removing a phosphate group from a tyrosine, serine, or threonine residue. Lo and coworkers synthesized the first activity probe for protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) which contained a coumarin unit as a fluorescent reporter [29]. Despite the novelty of the probe, no comprehensive study was carried out regarding selectivity or sensitivity.
Three years later the same authors paved the way further for activity-based probes, as they were the first to describe a class-selective probe for protein tyrosine phosphatases [30]. They prepared activity probes for protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) that contained a phosphate monoester recognition head for PTP1B, a latent p-QM unit (“trapping device”), a linker, and a reporter group (Figure 3). This latter moiety was either dansyl (LCL-1), which enables fluorescent labeling of protein, or biotin, through which sensitive secondary-detection is possible (LCL-2). It was shown in SDS-PAGE-labeling experiments that both compounds were selective for phosphatases compared to trypsin and β-galactosidase. The authors carried out labeling experiments in the presence of other proteins, such as albumin or phosphorylase b, but detected no signal for these on the gels. The time needed for the fluoride elimination was also studied with 19F NMR in the case of the dansyl-containing LCL-1, monitoring the peaks of inorganic fluoride and the starting material. The peak of the starting material disappeared in 96 h. During this, no enzyme inhibition was observed.
Using dyes with fluorescent emission towards higher wavelengths is advantageous as they avoid autofluorescence, thus improving the quality of labeling. Zhu and colleagues described activity-based probes that contain a Cy3 dye and target phosphatase activity [31]. Upon activation by the enzyme the two probes generate o- and p-QM, respectively, and both are capable of labeling PTPs and other phosphatases, such as alkaline phosphatases. Even though all phosphatases showed affinity towards the probes, members of other enzyme families (lipases, proteases) were not labelled.
Shen and coworkers developed this concept further by incorporating the latent QM to a peptide sequence [32,33]. They synthesized an unnatural amino acid residue of phosphotyrosine that contains a difluoromethyl group in the ortho position. This recognition unit was specified for PTP-1B and was linked with a PEG-chain to biotin as a reporter unit. The probe displayed concentration-dependent selectivity: 200 µM caused biotin labeling of both PTP1B and another PTP recombinant, PTP4A3, while 20 µM was selective to PTP1B. When the enzyme was inherently blocked, the probe did not bind to the protein, indicating that enzyme activity is needed for the process. It was also shown that one protein was labeled on multiple nucleophilic side chains and labeling yielded the inactivated enzyme. The authors performed the labeling in lysates, and they concluded. both in E. coli and Jurkat cell lysates, that adding a competing PTP inhibitor to the system facilitates the PTP1B labeling without nonspecific labeling of other phosphatases.
The incorporation of latent QMs to unnatural amino acids was carried out by Kalesh and coworkers as well [34], who wished to enable target-specific binding to different PTPs. This selective recognition was assured by the peptide sequence to which the unnatural amino acid residue was incorporated. The labeling was carried out with a rhodamine attached to the C-terminus of the short peptide chain. The peptide sequences were designed in accordance with the substrate recognition of a given enzyme. Five PTPs (PTP1B, TCPTP, SHP1, SHP2, LMWPTP) were tested with ten activity probes, with the obtained response (i.e., the intensity of fluorescent emission) corresponding well with the substrate preference. Besides labeling, the probes displayed concentration- and time-dependent inactivation of the enzymes (Table 1). One of the selective PTP1B inhibitors was also tested in HEK293T and NIH3T3 cell lysates, with the latter having very low endogenous PTPB1 expression. As indicated by Western blotting, 10 µM of probe concentration could detect 5 ng PTP1B enzyme in the HEK293T lysate, which highlights the feasibility of the described method.
Independently at the same time, Huang and coworkers aimed to carry out specific activity-based probes for different PTPs as well [35]. They also incorporated peptide segments as recognizable unit and three tripeptide-containing probes were synthesized: a leucinamide at the C-terminus, then the modified, latent QM-containing phosphotyrosine derivative, and either Glu, Phe, or Lys at the N-terminus. A biotin reporter was attached to the N-terminus through an ethylene glycol linker. Neither of the three probes showed activity towards non-phosphatase enzymes (carbonic anhydrase, γ-globulin, phosphorylase b, RNase A, and lysozyme) or non-PTP phosphatases (ALP, PTEN, PPP1CA, PPM1A). Five PTP enzymes were also studied (PTP1B, TCPTP, SHP2, VHR, PTP-PEST): one had no substrate preference, while four showed increased affinity towards a certain sequence, but no exclusive labeling could be achieved. Another drawback of the synthesized probes was the high instability in the absence of the target enzyme, which showed a 10% hydrolysis in aqueous media after 1 h.
Polaske and colleagues utilized QMs to label solid-phase proteins which can be used in immunoassays [36]. In this study, a primary antibody recognized an antigen attached to the surface, followed by the incubation of an alkaline phosphatase-secondary antibody conjugate (Figure 4). The activity-based QM precursor was applied via the hydrolysis of substrate and subsequent QM generation bound to a nucleophile in close proximity, either to the antibody complex or water. The probe was visualized either with DAB-detection or fluorescent microscopy, depending on the attached reporter group being biotin or Cy5-dye, respectively. As for the leaving group, difluoromethyl and monofluoromethyl groups were utilized. The effect of pH was studied first by the difluoromethyl derivative: at pH 7.0 no specific fluorescent signal was detected, meaning the fluorescent signal was spread all over the FFPE tonsil tissue. An alkaline pH would deprotonate the phenol and increase the rate of QM formation, and increasing the pH yielded slightly less background fluorescence, but not even pH 11 could exclude nonspecific labeling. To get specifically bound dyes, the authors wanted to accelerate the rate of fluoride elimination and QM formation as well as reaction with a nucleophile. They hypothesized that monofluoromethyl group as the leaving group would result in a more labile QM, and therefore decided to utilize this. At pH 8.5, the monofluormethylated probe showed diminished overall diffusion, and at pH 7.0–8.0 high diffusion could still be observed. Monofluorinated Cy5 probe was also synthesized, and the immunoassay at pH 10.0 yielded better signal-to-noise ratios at 1–5 µM.
The labeling efficiency of different self-immobilizing probes were also studied with an alkaline phosphatase substrate system [37]. Ten activity-based probes were synthesized (Figure 5) with both latent o- and p-QM moieties, three linkers; difluoromethyl, fluoromethyl or ethyl carbamate leaving groups and either fluorescein or the NIR emitting P-Mero4 dye. All fluorescein-containing probes were tested in PBS buffer, and after 1 h, incubation with ALP enzyme SDS-PAGE was carried out (Figure 5). The fluorescent signal was stronger in the case of p-QMs than o-QMs, indicating a more efficient labeling (ALP-3, ALP-4, ALP-5), and not even a o- and p-QM-containing probe (ALP-6) showed stronger fluorescence. However, the probes, especially ALP-3, showed nonspecific labeling of BSA, even in the absence of the activating ALP, implying the instability of the probe. Changes in the structure led to decreased off-target labeling: the replacement of fluoride led to a less reactive ethyl carbamate leaving group and the linker L-III to L-I (ALP-6). The affinity of ALP-6 towards acid phosphatase (ACP) was also studied, but no labeling was seen, probably due to the acidic condition that did not favor QM formation. Live cell imaging was performed on ALP overexpressing HeLa cells and ALP-deficient HEK293T cells. In the former cell culture ALP-6 performed the best, while in the latter no signal could be detected. A detailed labeling mechanism was also proposed for ALP-5 and ALP-6. In the probes containing a P-Mero4 NIR dye (ALP NIR-1 and ALP NIR-2), 660 nm emission was observed both on BSA and ALP on gel. Live animal imaging yielded covalent ligation of probes to the enzyme, and the fluorescent signal was detectable after 24 h.
For a summary of non-fluorogenic phosphatase probes, see Table 2.
The hitherto applied dyes do not ensure diminished background fluorescence, and the excess probes must be washed out from the sample. Fluorogenic behavior, caused by structural changes in the dye core accompanied with QM formation, could greatly improve the signal-to-noise ratio by decreasing background. However, up to this point, the built-in probe is usually quite distant from the aryl group of the latent QM unit and the covalent ligation site. In addition, utilizing fluorogenic turn-on dyes that do not dissociate from the site of activation would enable more precise monitoring of endogenous enzyme activity, thus using real-time cell imaging and FACS experiments. The fluorescence of push–pull dyes having a phenolate as the donor moiety can be quenched by substituting this phenolic oxygen. The removal of the substituent results in restored fluorescence [38]. Incorporating the enzyme substrate as the substituent of the phenolic OH results in fluorescence quenching and placing either a fluoromethyl or difluoromethyl group in the ortho position ensures the introduction of the latent QM. This way, the QM can be generated on the dye core as a result of enzyme-induced cleavage, and the subsequent dye–enzyme ligation provides non-diffusible labeling. Such fluorogenic systems are usually referred to as self-immobilizing probes.
The first fluorogenic PTP activity-based self-immobilizing probe was created by Ge and coworkers [39]. They based their work on the already-existing fluorogenic substrate of PTP, 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferone phosphate, but as this probe diffuses away from the activation site, further development was needed. An umbelliferone-containing unnatural amino acid was synthesized that not only was fluorogenic but could also be tailored to the desired PTP enzyme with elongation of peptide chains on the C- and N-termini. The probe contained a photolabile 2-nitrobenzyl group on the phosphate motif to facilitate chemical synthesis and provide temporal control for PTP-recognition. The authors incorporated the obtained pTyr mimicking amino acid to cell-penetrating peptides and studied one representative example (pER) and the probe as well. The UV light-induced uncaging of nitrobenzyl group was followed by fluorescence increment in the presence of PTP1B. However, the majority of this detected emission came from the water-quenched umbelliferone molecule, and only 10% of the probe was attached covalently to the enzyme, which did not solve the problem of diffusion. HeLa cells were incubated with the cell-penetrating peptides, but the same ligation rate was observed. Moreover, the needed UV-irradiation is not favorable for cells, so further improvement of this concept was needed.
Li and coworkers designed a NIR-emitting, self-immobilizing fluorogenic probe that could be activated by ALP activity [40]. They introduced a phosphate group for the caging of fluorescence and a monofluoromethyl group to the applied NIR dye (Figure 6). However, the synthesized probe ALPIN-2 underwent rapid hydrolysis in PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) at 25 °C to ALPIN-OH. The change of the leaving group to ethyl carbamate resulted in elevated stability (ALPIN-3), probably due to the steric hindrance of ethyl carbamate, as ALP could not hydrolyze its substrate in comparison with the leaving group free molecule. This problem could be addressed by incorporating a spacer between the dye and the ALP recognition unit (ALPIN-5). This probe showed intensive fluorescent bands on SDS-PAGE with ALP and was also capable of labeling BSA in the presence of ALP. In live cell imaging, strong NIR fluorescence was observed in HeLa cells using ALPIN-5, even with no-wash conditions. ALPIN-5 was injected into living mice, and the fluorescent signal was detectable even after 48 h (Figure 6).
The same group applied malachite green-based probes to monitor ALP activity [41]. Fluorogenicity was ensured by the very low fluorescent quantum yield exhibited by malachite green in aqueous environments because of its high conformal flexibility. The authors envisioned that binding to membrane proteins such as ALP would conformationally restrict the dye, thus enhancing the NIR fluorescence (670 nm). Malachite green was synthesized with three latent p-QM-containing units, caged with ALP substrates. In vitro study in PBS showed a 10-fold fluorescence increment upon ALP incubation and was attached to either ALP or the added nucleophile β-mercaptoethanol. No-wash, real-time imaging of live HeLa cells showed selective labeling of the cell membrane with no fluorescence inside the cell or photolability of the probe. As a result of cell imaging, the fluorescent turn-on ratio exceeded the in vitro measured data: the fluorescence was more than 100-fold stronger than in the absence of the probe.
For a summary of fluorogenic phosphatase probes, see Table 3.

3.2. Glycoside Hydrolases

Glycosidases play an important role in carbohydrate metabolism through hydrolyzing glycoconjugates into sugar units and aglycons. The first protocol utilizing QM chemistry for isolating glycosidases, namely O-linked N-acetylglucosaminidase, was described by Ichikawa and Ichikawa [42]. They synthesized biotinylated, N-acetylglucosamide substrate-containing probes that had different linkers and either a difluoromethyl or monofluoromethyl group in ortho position to the substrate (Figure 7). The probe was tested in buffer solution with the purified N-acetylglucosaminidase, and after 2 h of incubation at 37 °C the solution was treated with streptavidin-containing beads. The subsequent SDS-PAGE and visualization showed that difluoromethylated probe A was not efficient enough in labeling the enzyme, probably due to reasons attributed to the second fluorine atom (Figure 7). The disulfide bridge in B and C enabled a sulfide-exchange reaction between the probe and a cysteine residue in close proximity. This conjugate, however, could not be visualized due to the small amount of probe attached to the protein surface. To overcome non-efficient labeling displayed by A, a monofluormethyl derivative was also synthesized (D) which showed attachment to the enzyme.
Analogously, an activity probe for β-glucosidase, was reported by Tsai and coworkers [43]. A β-glucose was attached to a p-hydroxybenzylic fluoride unit that is linked to a biotin. Both enantiomers of the probe were incubated with β-glucosidase and the reaction was followed with 19F NMR. No difference occurred in the affinity towards the enzyme between the isomers. Gel electrophoresis was performed, indicating that multiple probes could have been attached to the enzyme. With high enzyme concentration (6.6 µM), no residual enzyme activity could be observed, which could be attributed either to aggregation of proteins or activity loss.
The first fluorescent, activity-based probe for glycoside hydrolases was designed by Kurogochi et al. [44], utilizing a dansyl dye and an o-difluoromethyl moiety. The probe acted as a suicide substrate of five different β-galactosidases, and a fluorescent emission at 520 nm could be detected for all proteins. After the labeling, proteases were added to each enzyme to induce fragmentation and, with the application of antidansyl antibody and MALDI-TOF, labeled peptide fragments could be identified. This method was proven to be feasible in the recognition of catalytic domains as well. Live cell imaging indicated that inhibition could be prompted in murine B16 cancer cells.
It was shown earlier that QM chemistry is a useful tool in creating antibody libraries exhibiting β-galactosidase catalytic activity [24]. To widen the scope of antibodies capable of hydrolyzing different sugars, Shie and coworkers developed this concept further [45]. They utilized the same recognition head-trapping device–linker–reporter group arrangement and tuned the recognition head to six sugars and anomeric configurations (α-d-Glc and β-d-Glc, α-d-Gal and β-d-Gal, α-l-Fuc and α-d-Man). By parallel syntheses, the glycosyl moiety could be easily replaced. Even though a detailed synthetic method was described, no application of the probes was demonstrated. A similar probe was described to monitor β-xylosidase activity [46].
β-galactosidase activity monitoring was carried out by combining QM chemistry and FRET (Figure 8) [47]. The reported probe consists of a 7-hydroxycoumarin as the energy donor and fluorescein as an energy acceptor, that is, exciting the coumarin at 400 nm, the emission of the fluorescein at 515 nm can be observed with a 93% FRET efficiency. Upon β-galactosidase catalytic activity (obtained from E. coli, encoded by LacZ gene), the carbamate leaving group is detached and the dissociated fluorescein diffuses away from the activation site. The QM is attacked by nucleophilic side chains of the protein, leading to covalent ligation accompanied by a distinct change in emission wavelength (460 nm instead of 515 nm), as no FRET occurs in the absence of fluorescein. This way, real-time monitoring of the reaction is easy and accurate. The labeled enzyme was also visualized with SDS-PAGE and ratiometric fluorescent microscopy of LacZ-positive HEK293 cells.
Quenching of fluorescent probes is also possible with the introduction of a FRET-based quencher moiety. Kalidasan et al. utilized this concept when designing an α-N-acetylgalactosamine-containing quenched activity probe targeting α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase [48]. A dabcyl quencher unit ensures diminished fluorescence of the incorporated fluorescein dye. As a result of enzyme activity, the dabcyl moiety is liberated, leading to restored emission of the fluorescein at 520 nm. The probe was applied in the directed evolution of galactosidases with enhanced activity, as cells containing enzymes with different activities could be differentiated by their emission intensity after incubation with the probe.
Kwan and coworkers reported the synthesis of coumarin glycosides aiming for better resolution [49]. In this case, the generation of QM and the subsequent reaction is slow enough for the probe to dissociate from the active site, thus it will not behave as an inactivator of the enzyme. That is, choosing a difluoromethyl moiety would facilitate this due to its greater stability and longer reaction times compared to the monofluoromethyl-containing probes. Three methylumbelliferone-based activity probes were synthesized with a recognition unit specific to either d-glucuronic acid, d-glucose, or d-galactose. The authors first studied the expression of β-glucuronidase expression in plant cells with d-glucurono-probe, and as a result, the specific fluorescence of the coumarin could be detected in the stomata without background fluorescence and photobleaching of the dye. d-gluco- and d-galacto-probes were employed in E. coli and yeast cells to which Agrobacterium sp. β-glucosidase/galactosidase was encoded. Covalent ligation proved to be successful as, after multiple washing cycles, the fluorescence of the probes did not diminish. This property enabled cell enrichment by FACS as well.
NIR glucuronide probes opened the door for in vivo imaging of β-glucuronidase activity [50]. Two analogous probes were designed, NIR-TrapG and FITC-TrapG, containing IR-820 and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dyes, respectively. The glucuronide recognition unit was attached to an o-difluoromethylphenol trapping unit. Preliminary experiments that were carried out with incubation of FITC-TrapG to either E. coli β-glucuronidase, mouse β-glucuronidase, or BSA showed that the probe displayed specific emission. More significantly, no enzyme inactivation was observed during the labeling, and the probe could attack either the target enzyme outside the active site or other bystander proteins. In vivo imaging was demonstrated on mice bearing subcutaneous CT26/mβG tumors. The measured fluorescence compared to the control CT26 cells were 4.59, 3.86, and 2.86 times stronger in the case of FITC-TrapG (525 nm) and 4.25, 4.92, and 5.21 times stronger in the case of NIR-TrapG (835 nm) after 24, 48, and 72 h, injected with 500 µg/mouse and 100 µg/mouse, respectively. Deep tissue imaging in mouse liver was also performed with both probes, but only the fluorescence of NIR-TrapG could be observed (Figure 9).
Hsu et al. synthesized a useful tool for monitoring α-l-fucosidase activity [51]. The probes had the usual arrangement of the activity-based labeling agents, that is, an enzyme recognition head, a latent trapping unit, and a linker-bound reporter. A BODIPY derivative was responsible for the visualization, while the leaving groups o-fluoromethyl and o-difluoromethyl moieties were applied. The probes were tested on a protein extract from E. coli, in which fucosidase was expressed: it was incubated for 1 h at four concentrations (5, 10, 20, 50 µM). Subsequent slot blot analysis resulted in weak fluorescence of the BODIPY (λem = 520 nm) in case of the difluoromethylated residue and strong bands by the monofluorinated derivative. Labeling was performed at 10 µM concentration of the monofluorinated probe in AGS and HEK-293T cells: lysotracker showed the accumulation of probes in the lysosome, while the activity-dependence was also proven with the application of a fucosidase inhibitor. The authors also found a connection between Helicobacter pylori infection and increased α-l-fucosidase activity with the use of this probe [52].
For a summary of non-fluorogenic glycosidase probes, see Table 4.
Doura and coworkers developed a new class of fluorogenic substrates for the in vivo imaging of β-galactosidase activity displayed by lacZ(+) cells [53]. They modified an already existing substrate of β-galactosidase, the hydroxymethyl-bearing rhodol HMDER-βGal [54]. The probes’ fluorogenicity is quenched when its phenolic OH is substituted due to a preference for the spirocyclic form that has negligible fluorescence. Liberating the phenolate moiety restores the fluorescence. By substituting the OH with an enzyme substrate, fluorescence turn-on can indicate enzyme activity. A fluoro- or difluoromethyl moiety is incorporated to ortho position to the β-galactosidase substrate as a leaving group (SPiDER-βGal-1 and -2) (Figure 10). In vitro study of the probes was in accordance with the earlier published observations, that is, SPiDER-βGal-1 was more reactive than the SPiDER-βGal-2 thus greater fluorescence turn-on could be detected (without other proteins, 650- and 210-fold, respectively). LacZ reporter, which is responsible for encoding E. coli β-galactosidase enzyme, could be visualized in HEK cell lysates. Several rhodol-bound proteins were revealed by SDS-PAGE, but free nucleophiles, e.g., water, were also able to react with the QM. The advantage of the synthesized probes, especially SPiDER-βGal-1, compared to HMDER is that they could distinguish LacZ(+) cells from LacZ(−) cells (Figure 10) without dissociating away from the active site, even under ex vivo conditions in Drosophila species and live mouse tissue.
A similar probe was developed for β-galactosidase activity, but with red-shifted fluorescence using silicon-rhodamine derivatives [55]. For preliminary experiments, the authors synthesized the 2′-Me-Sirhodol analogue (Figure 11a). The properties of 2′-Me-Sirhodol enabled the study of the probe at near physiological pH, because, according to its phenolic OH’s pKa value, at pH 7.4 the equilibrium shifted toward the deprotonated form, which is necessary for QM formation. This compound, however, did not show specific labeling of LacZ(+) cells. Further experiments pointed out that the extended π-conjugation reduced the reactivity of the QM. 2′-Hydroxymethyl-Sirhodol, which utilized intramolecular spirocyclization, and thus π-disconnection did not work as expected: it remained in spiroether form, even at higher pH values (above 10). To fine-tune the spirocyclization, next the 2′-COOH-Sirhodol (SPiDER-Red-βGal, Figure 11b) was studied, which displayed pKcycl value of 7.8, meaning nearly half of the probes existed in fluorescent form at pH 7.4. SPiDER-Red-βGal, nonfluorescent at pH 7.4, could differentiate LacZ(+) HEK cells from LacZ(−) ones with high resolution and S/N ratio, without the leaking of the dye. Ex vivo imaging in Drosophila melanogaster and fixed mouse brain slices was also carried out with the same differentiation ability.
To develop this concept further, Chiba and coworkers also attempted the targeted ablation of LacZ(+) cells with a selenorhodol-based activity probe [56]. Targeted cell ablation, i.e., selectively destroying cells, can be accomplished with the application of small-molecular photosensitizers being active only as a result of enzyme activity. Such activatable photosensitizer was synthesized earlier [57], although the phototoxic products dissociating away from the target cells was a major problem. The designed probe, SPiDER-killer-βGal (Figure 12), showed negligible fluorescence and no phototoxicity in the spirocyclic, β-galactose substituted form. Upon enzymatic hydrolysis, the QM was formed, and as the nucleophilic moieties attack it, the spiroether opens. This hydroxymethyl form exhibits efficient 1O2 production upon irradiation. Measurements at different pH values revealed that SPiDER-killer-βGal exists at pH 7.4 in the spirocyclic form, while without β-galactose the equilibrium is shifted toward the open form. The probe could differentiate between LacZ(+) and LacZ(−) HEK cells and caused concentration-dependent apoptosis, while incubating the cells without irradiation left them unchanged. These tendencies could be observed also in Drosophila melanogaster live culture tissue and epithelium, demonstrating the versatility of the described probe as an activatable photosensitizer.
Inspired by Withers’ work [49], Jiang and colleagues described a coumarin activated by β-galactosidase that utilized p-QM masked with a difluoromethyl group [58]. It was shown in previous examples that the difluoromethyl group can lead to the diffusion of the quinone methide resulting in lower labeling efficiency and weak fluorescence, but the authors hypothesized that moving the difluoromethyl group to the 3-position of the coumarin core would enhance the probe’s properties (Figure 13a). This change in structure would probably generate a stronger fluorescent emission while diminishing steric hindrance towards the enzyme. The difluoromethylation was carried out by a photochemically-induced radical reaction from the corresponding coumarin (BGC-1) in one step, yielding the probe BGC-2. The new probe displayed a 60 nm batochromic shift in the absorption wavelength compared to BCG-3, and had an over 200-fold fluorogenicity upon β-galactosidase activity. The emission spectrum of BCG-2 in PBS was similar to the 3-formylated coumarin derivative, revealing that a part of QM reacted with water instead of protein. SDS-PAGE experiments were also performed: the probe was incubated with β-galactosidase in the presence of BSA. According to fluorescent bands, both proteins were labeled. Live cell imaging was carried out in β-galactosidase, expressing CT26.CL25 cells and β-galactosidase-deficient CT.26WT cells (Figure 13b).
The monofluoromethyl-umbelliferon-galactoside [59] and SPiDER-βGal [60] were also used in β-galactosidase-catalyzed fluorescence amplification methods for immunostaining.
Hyun and coworkers utilized the azide-alkyne click reaction to isolate different glycosidases [61]. Five coumarin probes were prepared that contained either a monofluoro- or difluoromethyl group for the QM masking, as well as an alkyne affinity tag. β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, and β-N-acetylhexosaminidase substrates were applied. The authors envisioned that, after the immobilization of the coumarin probes, an added N3-biotin reagent will undergo a click reaction with the alkyne moiety, and the subsequent affinity chromatography enables isolation of the enzymes. After reaction with their corresponding activity probes, the residual enzyme activity was determined with NIR-emitting activity probes. As a result, less of the monofluorinated derivative was needed (10 eq) for complete enzyme inactivation of enzymes than in the case of the difluorinated compounds (100 eq). Due to an undesired side reaction of the difluorinated probes upon ligation to the enzyme a weakly fluorescent adduct is formed, explaining the poorer labeling ability of said probes. The O-GlcNAcase activity was also monitored in HT-29 cells with great selectivity. The cell lysates were treated with N3-biotin, followed by affinity chromatography yielding an isolated O-GlcNAcase. A similar probe with alkyne tag was developed for the monitoring of β-glucuronidase and bacterial α-l-fucosidase activity without a fluorescent reporter [62,63].
A senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) activatable NIR probe was developed by Liu et al. [64]. Senescence, that is, permanent cell growth arrest, is related with aging and age-related diseases. To detect this phenomenon in vivo, suitable NIR emitting fluorophores should be applied with a senescence-associated activation. To avoid dissociation of said dyes, a difluoromethyl leaving group was introduced to the designed NIR dyes (NIR-BG2, Figure 14). The monofluorinated derivative was also synthesized, however, it showed rapid decomposition via hydrolysis. The OH-group of the dye core is caged with the β-galactoside, connected through a self-immolative linker, quenching the fluorescence of the probe. Upon hydrolyzing NIR-BG2, only 16-fold fluorescence enhancement could be detected at 709 nm compared to the 100-fold turn-on of NIR-BG1 control without self-immobilizing properties. This difference could be attributed to quenching by formyl group formation via elimination of the second fluoride. NIR-BG2 was able to differentiate senescent HeLa cells from normal HeLa cells and LacZ(+) CT26.CL25 cells from CT26.WT cells. These cell imaging experiments pointed out the superiority of NIR-BG2 to NIR-BG1: the latter control probe could be washed out easily, while NIR-BG2 showed retained fluorescence. Camptothecin-induced cellular senescence in mice with HeLa tumor were also treated with NIR-BG2, with favorable outcomes.
For a summary of fluorogenic glycosidase probes, see Table 5.
Neuraminidase (NA, also called sialidase) is one of the proteins encoded by viral RNA that can act as a key compound to understand viral infection. The evolution of neuraminidase activatable self-immobilizing probes started with Lu and coworkers’ report [65]. The probe structure is similar to the earlier reported probes: a sialic acid enzyme substrate is connected to a trapping unit, having an o-difluoromethyl moiety and a biotin reporter. Tests carried out with NA obtained from Arthrobacter ureafaciens resulted in specific labeling of NA and without any labeling activity in the absence of the enzyme. Four different viral NA (from influenza A, Arthrobacter ureafaciens, Clostridium perfringens, Vibrio cholerae) were studied in the presence of the probe and zanamivir, a reversible inhibitor of NA activity, followed by residual activity determination with a methylumbelliferyl-substrate. Zanamivir acted as an effective inhibitor only in the case of influenza virus. The ELISA method was also conducted, and influenza A viruses were captured based on NA activity. With a modified version of the probe, containing a fluorescent dansyl unit instead of biotin, Hinou et al. studied Vibrio cholerae NA [66]. They showed that active site amino acids Asp-576 and Arg-577 were selectively labeled by the probe.
Zhu and colleagues used sialidase activatable self-immobilizing probes to deepen understanding on cellular senescence [67]. The probe had its features built up around a 4-hydroxymandelic acid core: sialic acid, as the recognition head; a rhodamine-X dye and a carbamate-linked blackhole quencher (BHQ). As long as the sialic acid substrate is intact, BHQ quenches the fluorescence of the rhodamine via FRET, but upon enzyme activation the carbamate bond is cleaved, and fluorescent emission is increased. An in vitro study with a recombinant neuraminidase was carried out, however, no fluorescent enhancement could be observed. This phenomenon could be attributed to covalent labeling of the enzyme and the subsequent activity loss. When the probe is hydrolyzed in the presence of BSA, both protein-dye conjugate can be visualized on SDS-PAGE, meaning that labeling is not specific on sialidase. Several live cell lines were incubated with the probe, but emission could be only observed in the case of sialidase-expressing cultures. They also did imaging of induced cellular senescence in human hepatocarcinoma Huh7 cells, which revealed lysosome-associated sialidase upregulation.
A probe with simpler structure was synthesized by Gao et al. [68]. Monitoring influenza virus neuraminidase activity was enabled by the sialic acid substrate, while ligation was made possible by a difluoromethyl coumarin dye. The fluorescent emission was detectable after several washing steps in E. coli labeling. MDCK cells, a host mammalian cell line for influenza growth, also recognized the sialidase substrate on the probe, however, in the presence of sialidase inhibitor, no fluorescent signal could be detected. When MDCK cells were infected with H3N2 virus, the surviving cells also showed fluorescence increment. Upon treating these cells with a specific viral neuraminidase inhibitor, Oseltamivir, the subsequent addition of probe did not result in fluorescence emissions, that is, the developed probe was activatable by viral neuraminidase as well. To improve this selectivity towards viral sialidase, two methyl groups were introduced to the C4 and C7 hydroxyl groups. This probe showed no affinity to label uninfected MDCK cells, but exhibited intensive fluorescence by the H3N2 infected cell line.
For a summary of neuraminidase probes, see Table 6.

3.3. γ-Glutamyl-Transpeptidase

The first QM-based activity probe for γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) was developed by Li and colleagues [69]. This enzyme is capable of catalyzing γ-glutamyl bond cleavage, and its increased activity can be associated with malignant tumors, thus selective labeling would benefit therapeutic applications. The structure of the probe (GGTIN-1, Figure 15) consists of γ-Glu, a self-immolative p-aminobenzyl linker, a HD-NIR dye containing a zwitterionic moiety, and the rarely utilized ethyl carbamate leaving group. When 10 µM GGTIN-1 solution was treated with GGT in PBS at 37 °C for 30 min, the fluorescence intensity was weaker than that of the control GGTIN-0, which can be attributed to the lack of nucleophiles in vitro. This intensity, however, was increased upon β-mercaptoethanol addition corresponding to the SH-bound dye. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that multiple proteins, such as GGT and BSA, present in the system are labeled after the activating trigger. Live HEPG2 cells and U87MG cells, known to overexpress GGT, were also incubated with GGTIN-1: real-time imaging was performed with no-wash conditions (Figure 15). In vivo imaging of mice with xenografted U87MG tumor was also feasible, and the intensive fluorescent emission was detectable even after 24 h. Organs of the mice were also analyzed as showing strong liver- and kidney-originated emission, proving increased GGT activity.
A rhodamine-based fluorescent GGT activity probe was described as well [70]. γ-Glu and a fluoromethyl group were introduced to a hydroxymethyl diethylrhodamine (4-CH2F-HMDiEtR-gGlu), which was capable of binding to nucleophiles via aza-QM formation. Intramolecular spirocyclization was utilized for tuning the pH dependence of the probe’s photophysical properties, while the absorbance of 4-CH2F-HMDiEtR-gGlu was reduced (pKcycl = 5.4), meaning that it existed in a colorless, spirocyclic form at pH 7.4, and 4-CH2OH-HMDiEtR-gGlu mainly displayed strong fluorescence (pKcycl = 9.6). Incubating the probe with GGT in vitro did not result in loss of enzyme activity. Live cell imaging was carried out on SHIN3 cells displaying high GGT activity and SKOV3 cells (Figure 16) with low GGT activity. A comparative study was done with gGlu-HMRG, an activity probe of GGT which is not capable of self-immobilization. This latter dye stained both type of cells, while applying 4-CH2F-HMDiEtR-gGlu resulted in specific emission. In vivo imaging on SHIN3 bearing mice showed the same outcome.
For a summary of γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase probes, see Table 7.

3.4. Sulfatases

Analogous to the phosphatase family, sulfatases play a crucial role in many biochemical pathways by removing the sulfate group from various molecules. The first activity-based probe for sulfatases was demonstrated by Lu and coworkers [71]. The authors designed an aryl-sulfate recognition head connecting to the latent trapping unit (from p-monofluormethyl group, p-QM formation is expected) to which a biotin is attached. The probe, selective for steroid sulfatase (STS), was studied with human STS expressed in CHO-K1 cells. After binding to streptavidin affinity gel surface, the probe was injected with STS fractions, and the conjugates were isolated and examined with SDS-PAGE. Visualization with anti-STS antibody showed that specific labeling was successful. No labeling was observed in the presence of estrone-3-O-sulfamate, a potent inhibitor of STS, which is in line with activity-dependent behavior.
Lenger and colleagues accomplished more precise sulfatase-based labeling with the utilization of a fluorescent dye reporter [72]. The authors aimed to improve probes 1 and 2, which displayed poor selectivity and did not act as irreversible and selective inhibitors of sulfatases (Figure 17). By designing probes 3 and 4, the more reactive monofluorophenyl group enabled better labeling efficiency (Figure 17). The probes were tested on four different sulfatases, two bacterial aryl sulfatases (KARS and PARS), one human aryl sulfatase (ARSG), and steroid sulfatase. The retained enzyme activity was determined with pNCS, a chromogenic (KARS, PARS, ARSG), or 3DHEAS, a radioactive sulfatase substrate (STS). Model compound 3 showed significant inactivation rate of KARS after 30 min (50%, 0.8 µM), but with the exception of ARSG, which was not affected at all, the inhibition happened in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in all cases. To determine the turnover ratio, a labeling experiment was conducted over 2 weeks, where the concentration of the probe and KARS was 140 µM and 70 nM, respectively. For the inactivation of every enzyme molecule 400 molecules of probe 3 were needed, which is in agreement with the earlier observations. Finally, crude E. coli lysates, which contained either active, inactive, or no sulfatase, were incubated with 1 mM probe 4, and the subsequent SDS-PAGE separation was followed by fluorescent imaging. It was shown that probe turnover was enzyme activity-dependent, however, the subsequent labeling was nonspecific.
Steroid sulfatase activity-based probes containing the substrate directly on the dye core were also synthesized [73]. A fluorogenic coumarin frame, with either monofluoromethyl or difluoromethyl groups in the 8-postion, had its phenolic OH caged by a sulfate group. The probes displayed a similar enzyme inactivation rate, with STS preparations verified by 19F NMR measurements: 25–30% hydrolysis of probes was enough to reach nearly complete enzyme inhibition. Next, 50 µg CHO/STS cell lysates were incubated with the probes (5 µM) in TRIS buffer. In the case of the monofluorinated derivative, 465 nm emission was detected upon incubation for 2 h showing a 7-fold increment. No fluorescence enhancement was detected by the difluorinated probe.
Intramolecular fluorescence quenching was also utilized in sulfatase activatable probes [74]. To the 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl-core a sulfate substrate, a dansyl fluorescent reporter and a p-nitrophenyl group were attached, the latter through a carbamate linker. Upon commercially available arylsulfatase activity, the carbamate bond was cleaved, and liberation of p-nitrobenzylamine moiety leads to restored dansyl emission at 480 nm.
Competitive labeling experiments proved that labeling with the probe caused partial loss of enzyme activity. To confirm that the probe is attached to the target enzyme, SDS-PAGE analysis was also carried out. Although the probe was not highly efficient, it formed a covalent conjugate with sulfatase.
For a summary of sulfatase probes, see Table 8.

3.5. β-Lactamases

Imaging bacterial antibiotic resistance through β-lactamase-associated methods would propel drug development greatly. Shao and coworkers designed FRET systems that are capable of covalently labeling antibiotic resistant bacteria [75]. Figure 18 shows the arrangement of such systems: to a p-hydroxybenzylic moiety, an oxidized cephalosporin substrate group, a fluorescent dye, and a fluorescence quencher were attached. The quencher was chosen to correspond to the requirements of FRET, so its absorption spectrum must overlap with the dye’s emission spectrum. Accordingly, quenching pairs were designed with FITC, Cy3 and Cy5.5 dyes with dabcyl, BHQ2, and BHQ3 quenchers, respectively. As soon as the bacteria hydrolyses the cephalosporin, the ester bond is cleaved, liberating the quencher. Upon TEM-1 β-lactamase addition in PBS buffer, the fluorescence enhancement was 38-, 110-, and 80-fold for LRBL1, -2, and -3, respectively. SDS-PAGE experiments confirmed the covalent ligation of the dyes to the target enzyme, while MALDI-TOF analysis showed that multiple modifications occurred on one enzyme. As a result of live cell imaging, carried out on Gram negative penicillin resistant E. coli and antibiotic susceptible E. coli, specific labeling was observed with strong fluorescence and high signal-to-noise ratio. Based on this, separation of the two types with flow cytometry was also possible compared to the problematic application of conventional dyes.
A coumarin was also utilized in activity-based β-lactamase detection [76]. In the 8-position, mono- and difluorinated derivatives were described, with a β-lactamase substrate caging the fluorescence of the dye. The monofluoro-containing probe exhibited a 50-fold fluorescent enhancement upon TEM-1 addition to β-lactamase in buffer, while the difluorinated one showed intense fluorescence only after the addition of effective nucleophiles as well. On the other hand, the difluoro-probe showed better labeling efficiency according to SDS-PAGE analysis. This phenomenon can be attributed to reaction with water in case of the monofluorinated probe. The specificity of the difluoro-probe was also better: in the presence of BSA it showed mainly covalent ligation to the target enzyme. In imaging of TEM-1 coding E. coli bacteria, the difluoro-dye performed better as well. Three more pathogenic bacteria strains were studied with the same outcome.
For a summary of β-lactamase probes, see Table 9.

3.6. Other Enzymes

Although activity-based probes most frequently target the aforementioned enzyme types, examples of labeling others are not without precedent. Carboxylestarases (CXE), that is, a group of serine hydrolases, could be targeted with Sellars and coworkers’ probe [77]. They utilized the fluorescence quenching effect displayed by p-nitrophenyl group that is connected via an easily fragmentable carbamate bond to the 4-hydroxymandelic acid core. A dansyl group was applied as fluorescent reporter, while p-hydroxybenzylic ester moiety served as enzyme substrate. Quenching resulted in a decreased fluorescent quantum yield of 8% compared to the 89% displayed by the non-quenched dye. Hydrolysis with KOH leads to 6-fold fluorescent increment. The authors then applied purified recombinant AtCXE12 serine hydrolase (0.8 mg/mL) to activate the probe (10 mM): at 37 °C and pH 7.4 3 h were needed for complete conversion. SDS-PAGE visualization revealed that multiple dyes were attached to one enzyme molecule in two regions.
Esterase targeting, acetyl-containing probes were synthesized by Shi and colleagues [78]. DHA, that is, diacetylated 4-hydroxymandelate, was chosen as core, in which the acetyl group on the aromatic ring acts as a substrate, while the other will be the leaving group. The applicability of such systems was demonstrated with sodium methoxide as a reaction partner: acetyl leaving also led to QM formation. Coumarin, fluorescein, and rhodamine were attached to the core, enabling fluorescent detection. The dyes exhibited selective labeling towards porcine liver esterase in the presence of BSA. Imaging in HeLa cells showed that the probe was captured by proteins in close proximity to the enzyme. The probes were able to track dying cells as well: they were activated and labeled by a receptor-interacting protein 3 that was followed by induced apoptosis.
The presence of nitroreductase (NTR) can indicate hypoxia tumor environment, thus detecting its activity can benefit therapeutic applications. To avoid the diffusion from the active site, a red emitting (λem,max = 560 nm) hemicyanine-based probe was designed recently by Wang and coworkers, utilizing QM chemistry (FY, Figure 19a) [79]. After the enzyme finds the recognizable unit, the aromatic or heterocyclic moiety containing a nitro group, a QM is formed as a result of reduction and subsequent electronic rearrangement (Figure 19). The applied p-nitrobenzyl group possessed a dual role: it was not only used as a recognition unit for nitroreductase but also as a quencher of the hemicyanine’s fluorescence by internal charge transfer processes. Live cell labelling was performed in normal cells (HEK293T) and cancer cells (A549), and the probe displayed good selectivity and sensitivity for NTR in mitochondria. Labeling on A549 cells both live and after fixation showed a significant difference between normoxic and hypoxic environments and the lack of labeling with the application of NY, a probe without the fluoromethyl substitution (Figure 19b). The feasibility of the designed system was demonstrated by zebrafish labelling as well.
For a summary of probes for other enzymes, see Table 10.

3.7. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are unstable oxygen-containing molecules or radicals (e.g., peroxides, hydroxide radical, singlet oxygen) that assist in the damage of biomolecules and subsequent cell death. H2O2-mediated QM formation was studied earlier by tuning arylboronate recognition moiety, although applying fluoride as the leaving group has been without precedent in these early works [80,81,82]. A H2O2 responsive, QM-based probe containing a boronate trigger was designed by Zhu and coworkers [83], utilizing a monofluoromethyl leaving group. The cleavage of the pinacolboronate group and the subsequent HF elimination led to o-QM formation that was able to attach a coumarin or a fluorescein in proximity to ROS activity. In vitro labeling with coumarin-containing Hyp-L-1 was carried out in the presence of BSA that exhibited intensive fluorescent signal upon H2O2 addition. However, not only H2O2 but peroxynitrite anion (ONOO) could also activate the probe. For live cell imaging on RAW264.7 macrophage Hyp-L-2 bearing a fluorescein dye was applied (Figure 20). Cellular uptake was ensured by the two acetyl groups attached to the phenolic OHs. Several fluorescent bands with different molecular weight could be visualized indicating high reactivity towards several nucleophiles. Without H2O2, no fluorescence could be detected. Cells with chemically-induced ROS could be selectively differentiated from non-stimulated cells, and furthermore, mitochondria oxidative stress was also visualized. Stimulated oxidative stress was also observable in mouse brain tissue.
Another fluorescein-based H2O2-responsive probe was reported by Iwashita and colleagues [84]. Peroxy Green-1 Fluoromethyl (PG1-FM) can sense H2O2 via its boronate group, while the incorporated monofluoromethyl group provides the masked QM. When the boronate group is intact, the dye exists in spirocyclic form, which enables cell permeability. Upon reaction with cellular H2O2, proximity labeling of proteins or water occurs through QM formation and the forming fluorescent dye, in its open form, will become membrane-impermeable. The probe was tested in vitro at physiological pH with multiple ROS, but showed only selective labeling upon H2O2 activity, even compared to peroxynitrite. The addition of BSA and MFP 231 cell lysates resulted in labeled proteins, showing no selectivity in covalent ligation. Exogenously H2O2-treated HeLa cells were also studied, and the probe showed minimal cytotoxicity during labeling. Endogenous H2O2 production, triggered by paraquat treatment in HeLa cells, growth factor stimulation in A431 cells, and PMA treatment in RAW 264.7 macrophages, was also monitored. In all cases, fluorescent enhancement could be detected with minimal background signal, while the lack or quenching of H2O2 did not yield any fluorescent response. The ability to detect peroxide was also demonstrated in a microglia-neuron coculture.
Novel ROS sensing agents with a quaternary ammonium salt leaving group were designed by Jung and coworkers [85]. As demonstrated before, both monofluoro- and difluoromethyl caging of QM function have drawbacks: the former can be unstable and prone to hydrolysis in aqueous solutions, while the slow QM formation from the latter allows the probe to diffuse away from activation site. Furthermore, the diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST) that is most frequently used for fluorine incorporation is a toxic, sensitive, and expensive reagent. The authors attempted to overcome these challenges by applying a morpholinium salt as a leaving group. To study the release process and choose the suitable fluorescent dyes, several morpholinium substituted model fluorophores, such as naphthylimide, coumarin, acedan, rhodol, and benzorosol, were synthesized containing a light-cleavable o-nitrobenzyl group (Figure 21). These probes are supposed to be activated by UV-light irradiation. Until the p-nitrobenzyl group is intact, no emission is exhibited by the dye due to PET quenching, except for the benzorosol derivative. Fluorescent enhancement could be observed upon light irradiation, the generated species labeled BSA rapidly at pH 7.4 in PBS buffer. The authors performed a labeling experiment in the presence of Boc-protected amino acids Lys, Cys and Ser, concluding that the probes were mainly attached to the thiol group of Cys. The naphthylimide derivative was also tested in HeLa cells: the fluorescence of the probe was retained even after the wash-out step. As the model compounds seem to work as expected, ROS/RNS activatable analogue was synthesized from the naphthylimide core by introducing an arylboronate instead of p-nitrobenzyl. H2O2, peroxynitrite, superoxide, hydroxy radical, and singlet oxygen were able to trigger fluorescent response and label BSA accordingly. Exogenously added and endogenously triggered H2O2 yielded strongly fluorescent cellular proteins, and the presence of ROS could be detected in mouse kidney tissue.
For a summary of ROS probes, see Table 11.

4. Conclusions

Herein we demonstrated the versatility of sensing and labeling with quinone methide function, focusing on enzyme activity and biologically relevant reactive oxygen species. The utilization of QM chemistry in biological media started with the development of mechanism-based/suicide inhibitors of enzymes. After enzyme-mediated removal of the substrate the generated electrophile QM can alkylate the active centrum, thus inactivating the enzyme. Activity-based probes also contain a recognition head tunable to the target function, and the activation is followed by covalent ligation as well. An attached reporter, either a fluorophore or an affinity-reporter, enables imaging or enrichment of the target motif, respectively. These probes frequently form covalent bonds outside the active site, although inactivating the enzyme is not without precedent. To control the effects displayed by the probe—i.e., whether it inactivates the enzyme or just labels it, or it labels proteins in the proximity of the enzyme—the fine-tuning of the applied leaving group is expedient. The most commonly used leaving group is fluoride, in the form of a monofluoromethyl or a difluoromethyl group. The former generates a more reactive QM but, in many cases, poses stability problems. The latter is stable, but the less reactive QM can diffuse further from the activation site. The third commonly used leaving group is the carbamate, which is stable and gives the same QM as the monofluoromethyl derivatives. Furthermore, the carbamate can have functional substituents, for example FRET acceptors (quenchers or fluorophores) that are removed upon activation. A wide range of fluorophores and fluorogenic dyes were applied, accomplishing sensitive, selective labeling, and retained spatial resolution with negligible background fluorescence, even under no-wash conditions and in live animals. This methodology is especially advantageous in live animals because the covalent ligation prevents rapid clearance of the dye.
We gave a detailed summary of protein labeling, focusing on chemical activation such as enzyme activity, but the application of QM chemistry goes beyond this. Photochemical methods to generate QMs and ways of application [86] were not outlined, although nonspecific protein labeling was accomplished with photoactivatable QMs as well [87,88,89,90]. The ability of DNA alkylating and cross-linking also widens the scope of biological applications [91,92,93,94,95,96]. Although the utility of QMs is obvious, there is still much room for improvement in the future. There are already examples of small molecule enzymatic probes suitable for two-photon microscopy [97], and these can be modified with a latent QM for covalent labeling. In vivo deep tissue imaging could also benefit from the use of NIR-II dyes (λ: 1000–1700 nm) [98], and this requires development in the area of NIR-II dyes as well, as there are not yet many examples of NIR-II enzymatic probes [99]. The fluorophores in this review cover the whole visible spectrum, allowing for multi-color labeling that could help in visualizing multiple events. In view of the versatility and the increasing potential in quinone methide-based applications, they surely will help further deepen our understanding of complex phenomena in living systems.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, and financed under the NKFIH-FK-137589 funding scheme. This work was supported by the ÚNKP-22-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund (D.K.). A.K. is grateful for the support of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (BO/00154/21/7 János Bolyai Research Scholarship).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ravikumar, Y.; Nadarajan, S.P.; Yoo, T.H.; Lee, C.-S.; Yun, H. Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis-based enzyme engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rawale, D.G.; Thakur, K.; Adusumalli, S.R.; Rai, V. Chemical Methods for Selective Labeling of Proteins. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6749–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scinto, S.L.; Bilodeau, D.A.; Hincapie, R.; Lee, W.; Nguyen, S.S.; Xu, M.; am Ende, C.W.; Finn, M.G.; Lang, K.; Lin, Q.; et al. Bioorthogonal chemistry. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2021, 1, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, J. The Ascension of Targeted Covalent Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 5886–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fang, Y.; Zou, P. Photocatalytic proximity labeling for profiling the subcellular organization of biomolecules. ChemBioChem 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fischer, N.H.; Oliveira, M.T.; Diness, F. Chemical modification of proteins–challenges and trends at the start of the 2020s. Biomater. Sci. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Turner, A.B. Quinone methides. Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1964, 18, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Toteva, M.M.; Richard, J.P. The Generation and Reactions of Quinone Methides. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 2011, 45, 39–91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodman, J.L.; Peters, K.S.; Lahti, P.M.; Berson, J.A. Picosecond Absorption Studies on m-Naphthoquinomethane. Singlet-Triplet Intersystem Crossing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Béchet, J.-J.; Dupaix, A.; Yon, J.; Wakselman, M.; Robert, J.-C.; Vilkas, M. Inactivation of α-Chymotrypsin by a Bifunctional Reagent, 3,4-Dihydro-3,4-dibromo-6-bromomethylcoumarin. Eur. J. Biochem. 1973, 35, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wakselman, M. 1,4- and 1,6-Eliminations from Hydroxy- and Amino-Substituted Benzyl Systems: Chemical and Biochemical Applications. Nouv. J. Chim. 1983, 7, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harper, J.W.; Powers, J.C. 3-Alkoxy-7-amino-4-chloroisocoumarins: A New Class of Suicide Substrates for Serine Proteases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7619–7621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Halazy, S.; Danzin, C.; Ehrhard, A.; Gerhart, F. 1,1-Difluoroalkyl glucosides: A new class of enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitors of α-glucosidases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3484–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Halazy, S.; Berges, V.; Ehrhard, A.; Danzin, C. Ortho- and para-(difluoromethyl)aryl-β-d-glucosidases. Bioorg. Chem. 1990, 18, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wakselman, M.; Cerutti, I.; Chany, C. Nitrobenzyl esters as potential conjugated alkylating and differentiation promoting agents: Antitumor effect in vivo. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 25, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wakselman, M.; Xie, J.; Mazaleyrat, J.-P. New Mechanism-Based Inactivators of Trypsin-like Proteinases. Selective Inactivation of Urokinase by Functionalized Cyclopeptides Incorporating a Sulfoniomethyl-Substituted m-Aminobenzoic Acid Residue. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Myers, J.K.; Widlanski, T.S. Mechanism-based inactivation of prostatic acid phosphatase. Science 1993, 262, 1451–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Q.; Dechert, U.; Jirik, F.; Withers, S.G. Suicide Inactivation of Human Prostatic Acid Phosphatase and a Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 200, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Born, T.L.; Myers, J.K.; Widlanski, T.S.; Rusnak, F. 4-(Fluoromethyl)phenyl phosphate acts as a mechanism-based inhibitor of calcineurin. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 25651–25655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Myers, J.K.; Cohen, J.D.; Widlanski, T.S. Substituent Effects on the Mechanism-Based Inactivation of Prostatic Acid Phosphatase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11049–11054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Massière, F.; Badet-Denisot, M.-A.; René, L.; Badet, B. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of the First Mechanism-Based Inhibitor of Glucosamine 6-Phosphate Synthase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5748–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aráoz, R.; Anhalt, E.; René, L.; Badet-Denisot, M.-A.; Courvalin, P.; Badet, B. Mechanism-Based Inactivation of VanX, a d-Alanyl-d-alanine Dipeptidase Necessary for Vancomycin Resistance. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 15971–15979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yaouancq, L.; Anissimova, M.; Badet-Denisot, M.-A.; Badet, B. Design and Evaluation of Mechanism-Based Inhibitors of d-Alanyl-d-alanine Dipeptidase VanX. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2002, 3573–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Janda, K.D.; Lo, L.-C.; Lo, C.-H.L.; Sim, M.-M.; Wang, R.; Wong, C.-H.; Lerner, R.A. Chemical Selection for Catalysis in Combinatorial Antibody Libraries. Science 1997, 275, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Betley, J.R.; Cesaro-Tadic, S.; Mekhalfia, A.; Rickard, J.H.; Denham, H.; Partridge, L.J.; Plückthun, A.; Blackburn, G.M. Direct Screening for Phosphatase Activity by Turnover-Based Capture of Protein Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cesaro-Tardic, S.; Lagos, D.; Honegger, A.; Rickard, J.H.; Partridge, L.J.; Blackburn, G.M.; Plückthun, A. Turnover-based in vitro selection and evolution of biocatalysts from a fully synthetic antibody library. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lo, L.-C.; Lo, C.-H.L.; Janda, K.D. A Versatile Mechanism-Based Reaction Probe for the Direct Selection of Biocatalysts. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2117–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lo, L.-C.; Chiang, Y.-L.; Kuo, C.-H.; Liao, H.-K.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lin, J.-J. Study of the preferred modification sites of the quinone methide intermediate resulting from the latent trapping device of the activity probes for hydrolases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 326, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lo, L.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Wang, Z.-J. Design and Synthesis of an Activity Probe for Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1999, 46, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lo, L.-C.; Pang, T.-L.; Kuo, C.-H.; Chiang, Y.-L.; Wang, H.-Y.; Lin, J.-J. Design and Synthesis of Class-Selective Activity Probes for Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, Q.; Huang, X.; Chen, G.Y.J.; Yao, S.Q. Activity-based fluorescent probes that target phosphatases. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2669–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shen, K.; Qi, L.; Ravula, M.; Klimaszewski, K. Synthesis and peptide incorporation of an unnatural amino acid containing activity-based probe for protein tyrosine phosphatases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3264–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shen, K.; Qi, L.; Ravula, M. Facile Incorporation of a Phosphatase Activity-Dependent Quinone Methide Generating Motif into Phosphotyrosine. Synthesis 2009, 22, 3765–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kalesh, K.A.; Pheng, T.L.; Lu, K.; Gao, L.; Wang, J.; Yao, S.Q. Peptide-based activity-based probes (ABPs) for target-specific profiling of proteintyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 589–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, Y.-Y.; Kuo, C.-C.; Chu, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.-H.; Hu, Y.-L.; Lin, J.-J.; Lo, L.-C. Development of activity-based probes with tunable specificity for protein tyrosine phosphatase subfamilies. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4521–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Polaske, N.W.; Kelly, B.D.; Ashworth-Sharpe, J.; Bieniarz, C. Quinone Methide Signal Amplification: Covalent Reporter Labeling of Cancer Epitopes using Alkaline Phosphatase Substrates. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, H.; Li, Y.; Xue, C.; Xie, H. Highly Efficient Multiple-Labeling Probes for the Visualization of Enzyme Activities. Eur. J. Chem. 2019, 25, 13994–14002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Gao, X.; Shi, W.; Ma, H. Design Strategies for Water-Soluble Small Molecular Chromogenic and Fluorogenic Probes. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 590–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ge, J.; Li, L.; Yao, S.Q. A self-immobilizing and fluorogenic unnatural amino acid that mimics phosphotyrosine. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10939–10941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Song, H.; Xue, C.; Fang, Z.; Xiong, L.; Xie, H. A self-immobilizing near-infrared fluorogenic probe for sensitive imaging of extracellular enzyme activity in vivo. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 5889–5894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.; Xue, C.; Wang, J.; Xu, M.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Song, H.; Xu, W.; Xie, H. High-contrast and real-time visualization of membrane proteins in live cells with malachite green-based fluorogenic probes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 1637–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ichikawa, M.; Ichikawa, Y. A Mechanism-Based Affinity-Labeling Agent for Possible Use in Isolating N-Acetylglucosaminidase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1769–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tsai, C.-S.; Li, Y.-K.; Lo, L.-C. Design and Synthesis of Activity Probes for Glycosidases. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3607–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurogochi, M.; Nishimura, S.-I.; Chuan Lee, Y. Mechanism-based Fluorescent Labeling of β-Galactosidases. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 44704–44712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Shie, T.-H.; Chiang, Y.-L.; Lin, J.-J.; Li, Y.-K.; Lo, L.-C. Facile synthesis toward the construction of an activity probe library for glycosidases. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lo, L.-C.; Chu, C.-Y.; Pan, Y.-R.; Wan, C.-F.; Li, Y.-K.; Lin, J.-J. Rapid and selective isolation of β-xylosidase through an activity-based chemical approach. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Komatsu, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Takakusa, H.; Hanaoka, K.; Ueno, T.; Kamiya, M.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. Design and Synthesis of an Enzyme Activity-Based Labeling Molecule with Fluorescence Spectral Change. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15946–15947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kalidasan, K.; Su, Y.; Wu, X.; Yao, S.Q.; Uttamchandani, M. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and directed evolution of α-N-acetylgalactosaminidases using a quenched activity-based probe (qABP). Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7237–7239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kwan, D.H.; Chen, H.-M.; Ratananikom, K.; Hancock, S.M.; Watanabe, Y.; Kongsaeree, P.T.; Samuels, A.L.; Withers, S.G. Self-Immobilizing Fluorogenic Imaging Agents of Enzyme Activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, T.-C.; Roffler, S.R.; Tzou, S.-C.; Chuang, K.-H.; Su, Y.-C.; Chuang, C.-H.; Kao, C.-H.; Chen, C.-S.; Harn, I.-H.; Liu, K.-Y.; et al. An Activity-Based Near-Infrared Glucuronide Trapping Probe for Imaging β-Glucuronidase Expression in Deep Tissues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3103–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hsu, Y.-L.; Nandakumar, M.; Lai, H.-Y.; Chou, T.-C.; Chu, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Lo, L.-C. Development of Activity-Based Probes for Imaging Human α-l-Fucosidases in Cells. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 8458–8463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nandakumar, M.; Hsu, Y.-L.; Lin, J.C.-Y.; Lo, C.; Lo, L.-C. Detection of Human α-L-Fucosidases by a Quinone Methide-Generating Probe: Enhanced Activities in Response to Helicobacter pylori Infection. ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 1555–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Doura, T.; Kamiya, M.; Obata, F.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Hiyama, T.Y.; Matsuda, T.; Fukamizu, A.; Noda, M.; Miura, M.; Urano, Y. Detection of LacZ-Positive Cells in Living Tissue with Single-Cell Resolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9620–9624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kamiya, M.; Asanuma, D.; Kuranaga, E.; Takeishi, A.; Sakabe, M.; Miura, M.; Nagano, T.; Urano, Y. β-Galactosidase Fluorescence Probe with Improved Cellular Accumulation Based on a Spirocyclized Rhodol Scaffold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12960–12963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ito, H.; Kawamata, Y.; Kamiya, M.; Tsuda-Sakurai, K.; Tanaka, S.; Ueno, T.; Komatsu, T.; Hanaoka, K.; Okabe, S.; Miura, M.; et al. Red-Shifted Fluorogenic Substrate for Detection of lacZ-Positive Cells in Living Tissue with Single-Cell Resolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15702–15706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chiba, M.; Kamiya, M.; Tsuda-Sakurai, K.; Fujisawa, Y.; Kosakamoto, H.; Kojima, R.; Miura, M.; Urano, Y. Activatable Photosensitizer for Targeted Ablation of lacZ-Positive Cells with Single-Cell Resolution. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 1676–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ichikawa, Y.; Kamiya, M.; Obata, F.; Miura, M.; Terai, T.; Komatsu, T.; Ueno, T.; Hanaoka, K.; Nagano, T.; Urano, Y. Selective Ablation of β-Galactosidase-Expressing Cells with a Rationally Designed Activatable Photosensitizer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6772–6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, J.; Tan, Q.; Zhao, S.; Song, H.; Hu, L.; Xie, H. Late-stage difluoromethylation leading to a self-immobilizing fluorogenic probe for the visualization of enzyme activities in live cells. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 15000–15003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Noguchi, K.; Shimomura, T.; Ohuchi, Y.; Ishiyama, M.; Shiga, M.; Mori, T.; Katayama, Y.; Ueno, Y. β-Galactosidase-Catalyzed Fluorescent Reporter Labeling of Living Cells for Sensitive Detection of Cell Surface Antigens. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020, 31, 1740–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hirata, M.; Kogame, T.; Adachi, S.; Haga, H. Galactosidase-catalyzed fluorescence amplification method (GAFAM): Sensitive fluorescent immunohistochemistry using novel fluorogenic β-galactosidase substrates and its application in multiplex immunostaining. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hyun, J.Y.; Park, S.-H.; Park, C.W.; Kim, H.B.; Cho, J.W.; Shin, I. Trifunctional Fluorogenic Probes for Fluorescence Imaging and Isolation of Glycosidases in Cells. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4439–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Whidbey, C.; Sadler, N.C.; Nair, R.N.; Volk, R.F.; DeLeon, A.J.; Bramer, L.M.; Fansler, S.J.; Hansen, J.R.; Shukla, A.K.; Jansson, J.K.; et al. A Probe-Enabled Approach for the Selective Isolation and Characterization of functionally Active Subpopulations in the Gut Microbiome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Luijkx, Y.M.C.A.; Henselijn, A.; Bosman, G.P.; Cramer, D.A.T.; Giesbers, K.C.A.P.; van ’t Veld, E.M.; Boons, G.-J.; Heck, A.J.R.; Reiding, K.R.; Strijbis, K.; et al. Detection of Bacterial α-l-Fucosidases with an Ortho-Quinone Methide-Based Probe and Mapping of the Probe-Protein Adducts. Molecules 2022, 27, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, J.; Ma, X.; Cui, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Deenik, P.R.; Cui, L. Noninvasive NIR Imaging of Senescence via In Situ Labeling. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 17969–17978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lu, C.-P.; Ren, C.-T.; Lai, Y.-N.; Wu, S.-H.; Wang, W.-M.; Chen, J.-Y.; Lo, L.-C. Design of a Mechanism-Based Probe for Neuraminidase To Capture Influenza Viruses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6888–6892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hinou, H.; Kurogochi, M.; Shimizu, H.; Nishimura, S.-I. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae Neuraminidase by a Novel Mechanism-Based Fluorescent Labeling Reagent. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 11669–11675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, R.; Wang, S.; Xue, Z.; Han, J.; Han, S. Senescence-associated sialidase revealed by an activatable fluorescence-on labeling probe. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 11566–11569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, Z.; Thompson, A.J.; Paulson, J.C.; Withers, S.G. Proximity Ligation-Based Fluorogenic Imaging Agents for Neuraminidases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13538–13541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, Y.; Xue, C.; Fang, Z.; Xu, W.; Xie, H. In Vivo Visualization of γ-Glutamyl Transpeptidase Activity with an Activatable Self-Immobilizing Near-Infrared Probe. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 15017–15024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Obara, R.; Kamiya, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Abe, A.; Kojima, R.; Kawaguchi, T.; Sugawara, M.; Takahashi, A.; Noda, T.; Urano, Y. γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT)-Activatable Fluorescence Probe for Durable Tumor Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2125–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lu, C.-P.; Ren, C.-T.; Wu, S.-H.; Chu, C.-Y.; Lo, L.-C. Development of an Activity-Based Probe for Steroid Sulfatases. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2187–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lenger, J.; Schröder, M.; Ennemann, E.C.; Müller, B.; Wong, C.-H.; Noll, T.; Dierks, T.; Hanson, S.R.; Sewald, N. Evaluation of sulfatase-directed quinone methide traps for proteomics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Tai, C.-H.; Lu, C.-P.; Wu, S.-H.; Lo, L.-C. Synthesis and evaluation of turn-on fluorescent probes for imaging steroid sulfatase activities in cells. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6116–6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Park, H.-J.; Rhee, H.-W.; Hong, J.-I. Activity-based fluorescent probes for monitoring sulfatase activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 4939–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shao, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Dong, X.; Tang, K.; Yan, X.; Xing, B. A Covalent Reporter of β-Lactamase Activity for Fluorescent Imaging and Rapid Screening of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10903–10910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mao, W.; Xia, L.; Wang, Y.; Xie, H. A Self-Immobilizing and Fluorogenic Probe for β-Lactamase Detection. Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 3493–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sellars, J.-D.; Landrum, M.; Congreve, A.; Dixon, D.P.; Mosely, J.A.; Beeby, A.; Edwards, R.; Steel, P.G. Fluorescence quenched quinone methide based activity probes–a cautionary tale. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 1610–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shi, Y.; Zhu, R.; Xue, Z.; Han, J.; Han, S. An in cellulo-activated multicolor cell labeling approach used to image dying cell clearance. Analyst 2019, 144, 4687–4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, S.; Tan, W.; Lang, W.; Qian, H.; Guo, S.; Zhu, L.; Ge, J. Fluorogenic and Mitochondria-Localizable Probe Enables Selective Labeling and Imaging of Nitroreductase. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 7272–7277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cao, S.; Wang, Y.; Peng, X. ROS-Inducible DNA Cross-Linking Agent as a New Anticancer Prodrug Building Block. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3850–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cao, S.; Wang, Y.; Peng, X. The Leaving Group Strongly Affects H2O2-Induced DNA Cross-Linking by Arylboronates. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Wang, Y.; Fan, H.; Balakrishnan, K.; Lin, Z.; Cao, S.; Chen, W.; Fan, Y.; Guthrie, Q.A.; Sun, H.; Teske, K.A.; et al. Hydrogen peroxide activated quinone methide precursors with enhanced DNA cross-linking capability and cytotoxicity towards cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 133, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Zhu, H.; Tamura, T.; Fujisawa, A.; Nishikawa, Y.; Cheng, R.; Takato, M.; Hamachi, I. Imaging and Profiling of Proteins under Oxidative Conditions in Cells and Tissues by Hydrogen-Peroxide-Responsive Labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15711–15721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Iwashita, H.; Castillo, E.; Messina, M.S.; Swanson, R.A.; Chang, C.J. A tandem activity-based sensing and labeling strategy enables imaging of transcellular hydrogen peroxide signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2018513118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jung, Y.L.; Sarkar, S.; Ha, J.; Park, S.B.; Ahn, K.H. Fluorophore Labeling of Proteins: A Versatile Trigger–Release–Conjugation Platform Based on the Quinone Methide Chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2022, 33, 1543–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Basarić, N.; Mlinarić-Majerski, K.; Kralj, M. Quinone Methides: Photochemical Generation and its Application in Biomedicine. Curr. Org. Chem. 2014, 18, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zlatić, K.; Antol, I.; Uzelac, L.; Mikecin Dražić, A.-M.; Kralj, M.; Bohne, C.; Basarić, N. Labeling of Proteins by BODIPY-Quinone Methides Utilizing Anti-Kasha Photochemistry. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zlatić, K.; Cindrić, M.; Antol, I.; Uzelac, L.; Mihaljević, B.; Kralj, M.; Basarić, N. Wavelength dependent photochemistry of BODIPY–phenols and their applications in the fluorescent labeling of proteins. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 4891–4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kashima, H.; Kamiya, M.; Obata, F.; Kojima, R.; Nakano, S.; Miura, M.; Urano, Y. Photoactivatable fluorophores for durable labelling of individual cells. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 5802–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zlatić, K.; Bogomolec, M.; Cindrić, M.; Uzelac, L.; Basarić, N. Synthesis, photophysical properties, anti-Kasha photochemical reactivity and biological activity of vinyl- and alkynyl-BODIPY derivatives. Tetrahedron 2022, 124, 132995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, P.; Song, Y.; Zhang, L.; He, H.; Zhou, X. Quinone Methide Derivatives: Important Intermediates to DNA Alkylating and DNA Cross-linking Actions. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 2893–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Percivalle, C.; Doria, F.; Freccero, M. Quinone Methides as DNA Alkylating Agents: An Overview on Efficient Activation Protocols for Enhanced Target Selectivity. Curr. Org. Chem. 2014, 18, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Huang, C.; Rokita, S.E. DNA alkylation promoted by an electron-rich quinone methide intermediate. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hutchinson, M.A.; Deeyaa, B.D.; Byrne, S.R.; Williams, S.J.; Rokita, S.E. Directing Quinone Methide-Dependent Alkylation and Cross-Linking of Nucleic Acids with Quaternary Amines. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020, 31, 1486–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Deeyaa, B.D.; Rokita, S.E. Migratory ability of quinone methide-generating acridine conjugates in DNA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 1671–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Byrne, S.R.; Rokita, S.E. Unraveling Reversible DNA Cross-Links with a Biological Machine. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33, 2903–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qian, L.; Li, L.; Yao, S.Q. Two-Photon Small Molecule Enzymatic Probes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, F. Molecular Fluorophores for Deep-Tissue Bioimaging. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 1302–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Ma, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, X.-D. Activatable NIR-II organic fluorescent probes for bioimaging. Theranostics 2022, 12, 3345–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Isomers of quinone methide and their zwitterionic resonance structure. Ortho- and para-aza-quinone methides. (b) Cartoon representation of QM generation.
Figure 1. (a) Isomers of quinone methide and their zwitterionic resonance structure. Ortho- and para-aza-quinone methides. (b) Cartoon representation of QM generation.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g001
Figure 2. General structure of the ortho- and para-(difluoromethyl)aryl-β-glucosides, activation cascade upon β-glucosidase activity, and the subsequent ligation with a nucleophilic side chain of the enzyme of interest (“Nu-Enzyme”).
Figure 2. General structure of the ortho- and para-(difluoromethyl)aryl-β-glucosides, activation cascade upon β-glucosidase activity, and the subsequent ligation with a nucleophilic side chain of the enzyme of interest (“Nu-Enzyme”).
Chemosensors 11 00155 g002
Figure 3. The structure of LCL-1 and LCL-2 and the mechanism of substrate cleavage. Reprinted with permission from [30], copyright 2002 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. The structure of LCL-1 and LCL-2 and the mechanism of substrate cleavage. Reprinted with permission from [30], copyright 2002 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g003
Figure 4. (A) Mechanism of covalent ligation to the target protein complex and (B) visualization of biotinylated probes with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Reprinted with permission from [36], copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (A) Mechanism of covalent ligation to the target protein complex and (B) visualization of biotinylated probes with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Reprinted with permission from [36], copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g004
Figure 5. (a) Ligation mechanism of alkaline phosphatase activity-based probes and (b) the structure of the synthesized ALP and ALP-NIR probes. (c) Coomassie blue staining (CBS) and fluorescent (FL) imaging of ALP (12.5 U mL−1) enzyme with the activity probes (7.5 µM, 1 h incubation) in the presence or absence of BSA (0.15 mg mL−1) at 37 °C. (d) Imaging of BSA with the probes (7.5 µM, 1 h incubation) in the absence of ALP enzyme at 37 °C. Reproduced with permission from [37], copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 5. (a) Ligation mechanism of alkaline phosphatase activity-based probes and (b) the structure of the synthesized ALP and ALP-NIR probes. (c) Coomassie blue staining (CBS) and fluorescent (FL) imaging of ALP (12.5 U mL−1) enzyme with the activity probes (7.5 µM, 1 h incubation) in the presence or absence of BSA (0.15 mg mL−1) at 37 °C. (d) Imaging of BSA with the probes (7.5 µM, 1 h incubation) in the absence of ALP enzyme at 37 °C. Reproduced with permission from [37], copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g005
Figure 6. (a) Exact structures of the synthesized ALPIN dyes. (b) Fluorescent imaging of a tissue slice of a xenografted HeLa tumor in mice with immobilizing ALPIN-5 and non-immobilizing ALPIN-4 probes. (c) Fluorescent intensity of ALPIN-4 and ALPIN-5 after 48 h. (d) Imaging of ALP activity in mice in a 48 h time frame. Values are the mean ± SD (* p < 0.05, n = 3). The red arrows and circles indicate the tumor locations in the mice. Adapted from [40], used under CC BY-NC 3.0.
Figure 6. (a) Exact structures of the synthesized ALPIN dyes. (b) Fluorescent imaging of a tissue slice of a xenografted HeLa tumor in mice with immobilizing ALPIN-5 and non-immobilizing ALPIN-4 probes. (c) Fluorescent intensity of ALPIN-4 and ALPIN-5 after 48 h. (d) Imaging of ALP activity in mice in a 48 h time frame. Values are the mean ± SD (* p < 0.05, n = 3). The red arrows and circles indicate the tumor locations in the mice. Adapted from [40], used under CC BY-NC 3.0.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g006
Figure 7. SDS-PAGE visualization of probes A–D before (lines 1, 3, 5, and 7) and after (2, 4, 6, and 8) affinity purification with streptavidin-agarose beads (left) and structure of the synthesized activity probes A–D. Reproduced with permission from [42], copyright 2001 Elsevier.
Figure 7. SDS-PAGE visualization of probes A–D before (lines 1, 3, 5, and 7) and after (2, 4, 6, and 8) affinity purification with streptavidin-agarose beads (left) and structure of the synthesized activity probes A–D. Reproduced with permission from [42], copyright 2001 Elsevier.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g007
Figure 8. FRET-based β-galactosidase activatable probe CMFβ-gal. Reprinted with permission from [47], copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. FRET-based β-galactosidase activatable probe CMFβ-gal. Reprinted with permission from [47], copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g008
Figure 9. Imaging of CT26/mβG and CT26 cell-bearing mice with probes NIR-TrapG (A) and FITC-TrapG (B). Reprinted with permission from [50], copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Imaging of CT26/mβG and CT26 cell-bearing mice with probes NIR-TrapG (A) and FITC-TrapG (B). Reprinted with permission from [50], copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g009
Figure 10. (a) Activation eof SPiDER-βGal-1 and -2. (b) SDS-PAGE visualization of SPiDER-βGal-1 and -2 in comparison with HMDER-βGal in HEK-LacZ(+) cells. (b) Fluorescent imaging of HEK-LacZ(+) cells incubated with either SPiDER-βGal-1 or HMDER-βGal (1 µM). Before and after washing and after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. Adapted with permission from [53], copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 10. (a) Activation eof SPiDER-βGal-1 and -2. (b) SDS-PAGE visualization of SPiDER-βGal-1 and -2 in comparison with HMDER-βGal in HEK-LacZ(+) cells. (b) Fluorescent imaging of HEK-LacZ(+) cells incubated with either SPiDER-βGal-1 or HMDER-βGal (1 µM). Before and after washing and after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. Adapted with permission from [53], copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g010
Figure 11. (a) Activation of nonfluorogenic 2′Me-4CH2F-Sirhodol-βGal and (b) SPiDER-Red-βGal. Adapted with permission from [55], copyright 2018 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 11. (a) Activation of nonfluorogenic 2′Me-4CH2F-Sirhodol-βGal and (b) SPiDER-Red-βGal. Adapted with permission from [55], copyright 2018 John Wiley and Sons.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g011
Figure 12. Activaton of SPiDER-killer-βGal. Adapted with permission from [56], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 12. Activaton of SPiDER-killer-βGal. Adapted with permission from [56], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g012
Figure 13. (a) Probes BGC-1, -2, and -3. (b) Fluorescent imaging in live CT26.CL25 and CT26.WT cells. Adapted from [58] with permission.
Figure 13. (a) Probes BGC-1, -2, and -3. (b) Fluorescent imaging in live CT26.CL25 and CT26.WT cells. Adapted from [58] with permission.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g013
Figure 14. Activation of self-immobilizing probe NIR-BG2 and control probe NIR-BG1. Reprinted with permission from [64], copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 14. Activation of self-immobilizing probe NIR-BG2 and control probe NIR-BG1. Reprinted with permission from [64], copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g014
Figure 15. (a) Structures of GGTIN-0, GGTIN-1, (b) A1, A2, and A3. (c) Turn-on mechanism activated by γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. (d) Fluorescent imaging of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in HepG2 cells or GGsTop (0.5 mM), a γ-glutamyl transpeptidase inhibitor pretreated HepG2 cells with GGTIN-0 and GGTIN-1 (5 µM, 37 °C, 1 h incubation). (e) Real-time and wash-free images obtained with the use of GGTIN-1. Reprinted with permission from [69], copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 15. (a) Structures of GGTIN-0, GGTIN-1, (b) A1, A2, and A3. (c) Turn-on mechanism activated by γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. (d) Fluorescent imaging of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in HepG2 cells or GGsTop (0.5 mM), a γ-glutamyl transpeptidase inhibitor pretreated HepG2 cells with GGTIN-0 and GGTIN-1 (5 µM, 37 °C, 1 h incubation). (e) Real-time and wash-free images obtained with the use of GGTIN-1. Reprinted with permission from [69], copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g015
Figure 16. (a) Fluorescent imaging of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in SHIN3 cells with 4-CH2F-HMDiEtR-gGlu and non-immobilizable gGlu-HMRG (1 µM) before washing, after washing, and after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. (b) The measured fluorescent intensity. Reproduced with permission from [70], copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 16. (a) Fluorescent imaging of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity in SHIN3 cells with 4-CH2F-HMDiEtR-gGlu and non-immobilizable gGlu-HMRG (1 µM) before washing, after washing, and after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. (b) The measured fluorescent intensity. Reproduced with permission from [70], copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g016
Figure 17. (a) Activation of probes 1–4 by sulfatase activity. (b) Inhibition of the four sulfatases (white: without inhibitor, grey: 1 mM inhibitor, black: 3 mM inhibitor). Reproduced with permission from [72], copyright 2012 Elsevier.
Figure 17. (a) Activation of probes 1–4 by sulfatase activity. (b) Inhibition of the four sulfatases (white: without inhibitor, grey: 1 mM inhibitor, black: 3 mM inhibitor). Reproduced with permission from [72], copyright 2012 Elsevier.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g017
Figure 18. Activation of probes LRBL1, LRBL2, and LRBL3 by antiobiotic-resistant bacteria and applied fluorophores and quenchers. Reproduced with permission from [75], copyright 2013 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 18. Activation of probes LRBL1, LRBL2, and LRBL3 by antiobiotic-resistant bacteria and applied fluorophores and quenchers. Reproduced with permission from [75], copyright 2013 John Wiley and Sons.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g018
Figure 19. (a) FY probe and its activation. (b) Fluorescent imaging of FY/NY probes in live A549 cells (cprobes = 20 µM) and after MeOH fixation (cprobes = 100 µM). Reprinted with permission from [79], copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 19. (a) FY probe and its activation. (b) Fluorescent imaging of FY/NY probes in live A549 cells (cprobes = 20 µM) and after MeOH fixation (cprobes = 100 µM). Reprinted with permission from [79], copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g019
Figure 20. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of Hyp-2-L (5 µM) labeling in living RAW264.7 cells with increasing H2O2 concentrations. (b) Normalized fluroescence intensity gained from the former labeling. (c) Fixed cells after Hyp-2-L treatment. (d) Images obtained with HYDROP, a commercially available H2O2 sensor, show low fluorescent on untreated cells. Reprinted with permission from [83], copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 20. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of Hyp-2-L (5 µM) labeling in living RAW264.7 cells with increasing H2O2 concentrations. (b) Normalized fluroescence intensity gained from the former labeling. (c) Fixed cells after Hyp-2-L treatment. (d) Images obtained with HYDROP, a commercially available H2O2 sensor, show low fluorescent on untreated cells. Reprinted with permission from [83], copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g020
Figure 21. (a) Synthesis of the morpholinium derivatives. (b) The synthesized, p-nitrobenzyl caged probes. Reprinted with permission from [85], copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 21. (a) Synthesis of the morpholinium derivatives. (b) The synthesized, p-nitrobenzyl caged probes. Reprinted with permission from [85], copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Chemosensors 11 00155 g021
Table 1. Kinetic data of the enzyme inhibition of probes from [34].
Table 1. Kinetic data of the enzyme inhibition of probes from [34].
StructureTarget Enzymeki (min−1)Ki (mM)Selectivity between PTPs
Chemosensors 11 00155 i001GGDEGIHXSELISHP10.782.81moderate selectivity
GGGSAAPXLKTKPTPB1/TCPTP0.681.00moderate selectivity
GGKAVDGXVKPQPTP1B0.710.97high PTPB1 selectivity
GGLNSDGXTPEPLMWPTP0.802.19moderate selectivity
GGLPPEGXVVVVSHP20.743.89moderate selectivity
GGNSDVQXTEVQSHP1/SHP20.731.93moderate selectivity
GGPEGHEXpYRVRPTP1B0.750.94moderate selectivity
GGPQDKEXYKVKSHP2/PTP1B0.752.45moderate selectivity
GGVDADEXLIPQSHP2/PTP1B0.711.48moderate selectivity
GGELEFXMDEPTP1B0.611.00moderate selectivity
Table 2. Non-fluorogenic activity-based probes for different phosphatases.
Table 2. Non-fluorogenic activity-based probes for different phosphatases.
Structure aTarget Enzymeλ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i002PTP1B330/520no cross-labeling in a mixture of proteinsin vitro[30]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i003PTP (yeast), ALPs (calf, shrimp, human)555/565selective against other enzyme classes, no selectivity among phosphatasesin vitro[31]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i004PTP (yeast), ALPs (calf, shrimp, human)555/565selective against other enzyme classes, no selectivity among phosphatasesin vitro[31]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i005PTP1B540/565high PTPB1 selectivity against other PTPs, no cross-labeling in cell lysatesin vitro[34]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i006ALP490/520low labeling efficiencyin vitro[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i007ALP490/520low labeling efficiencyin cellulo (HeLa)[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i008ALP490/520cross-labeling with other proteinin vitro[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i009ALP490/520cross-labeling with other proteinin vitro[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i010ALP490/520cross-labeling with other protein, most efficient labeling d in vitroin cellulo (HeLa)[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i011ALP490/520cross-labeling with other protein, most efficient labeling d in celluloin cellulo (HeLa)[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i012ALP620/670cross-labeling with other protein, most efficient labeling e in vitroin cellulo (HeLa), in vivo (mice)[37] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i013ALP620/670cross-labeling with other protein, most efficient labeling e in cellulo, low cytotoxicityin cellulo (HeLa), in vivo (mice)[37] c
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima. b approximate absorption and emission maxima. c for details of the structures, see Figure 5. d compared to the other fluorescein-containing ALP probes from [32]. e compared to the other NIR ALP probe from [32].
Table 3. Fluorogenic activity-based probes for different phosphatases.
Table 3. Fluorogenic activity-based probes for different phosphatases.
Structure aTarget
Enzyme
Turn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied
System
Ref.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i014PTPND360/460in vitro model compound for the other probes in [34], low efficiency but specific labeling, no loss of enzyme activity,
kcat = 8.8 s−1, KM = 1.1 mM
in vitro[39]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i015PTPND360/460needs UV irradiation to uncage the active probe;
localizes in plasma membrane
in cellulo (HeLa)[39]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i016PTPND360/460needs UV irradiation to uncage the active probe;
localizes in ER
in cellulo (HeLa)[39]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i017PTPND360/460needs UV irradiation to uncage the active probe;
localizes in mitochondria
in cellulo (HeLa)[39]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i018ALPND685/720unstable, hydrolyzes in PBS pH 7.4in vitro[40]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i019ALPND685/720stable, but ALP cannot hydrolyze the phosphate moietyin vitro[40]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i020ALP40×685/720cross-labeling with other protein, but in cellulo most of the fluorescence is detected in the plasma membrane, where ALP is located, low cytotoxicityin cellulo (HeLa)
in vivo (mice)
[40]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i021ALP10× c
up to 200× d
633/655–685higher photostability compared to the NIR dye from [32]; no cross-labeling studies, but in cellulo most of the fluorescence is detected in the plasma membrane, where ALP is located, low cytotoxicityin cellulo (HeLa, HepG2, HCT116 cells)[41]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima. c determined in vitro. d determined in cellulo.
Table 4. Non-fluorogenic activity-based probes for different glycosidases.
Table 4. Non-fluorogenic activity-based probes for different glycosidases.
Structure aTarget
Enzyme b
λ (nm) abs/em cNotesStudied
System
Ref.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i022GLB360/520inactivates GLB:
A. oryzae: Ki = 1.44 mM, t1/2 = 10.5 min
bovine liver: Ki = 0.22 mM, t1/2 = 4.22 min
B. circulans: Ki = 1.38 mM, t1/2 = 11.2 min
X. manihotis: Ki = 38.5 mM, t1/2 = 21.1 min
E. coli: Ki = 3.5 mM, t1/2 = 4.3 min
in cellulo (B16 cells)[44]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i023GLB400/515, 400/460the ratiometric fluorescence response can be used for accurate determination of enzyme concentration;
kcat = 6.1 s−1, KM = 150 µM
in cellulo (LacZ-positive HEK293 cells)[47]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i024GLB490/525no loss of enzyme activity, cross-labeling with other proteins, can be used for in vivo imaging of subcutaneous tumorsin vitro (E. coli and CT26), in vivo (mice)[50]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i025GLB710/835can be used for in vivo imaging of subcutaneous and deep tissue tumorsin vivo (mice)[50]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i026FUCA497/520efficient labeling, localizes in lysosomes, low cytotoxicityin cellulo (AGS and HEK293 cells)[51,52]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i027FUCA497/520low labeling efficiencyin vitro[51]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima. b enzyme abbreviations: GLB: β-galactosidase, FUCA: α-l-fucosidase. c approximate absorption and emission maxima.
Table 5. Fluorogenic activity-based probes for different glycosidases.
Table 5. Fluorogenic activity-based probes for different glycosidases.
Structure aTarget
Enzyme b
Turn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em cNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i028NAGAND490/520used for the directed evolution of NAGAs:
wild type: kcat = 384 s−1,
KM = 172 µM;
variant: kcat = 287 s−1,
KM = 62 µM;
cross-labeling with other proteins
in vivo
(NovaBlue (D3) competent cells)
[48]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i029GUSBND330/450highly specific fluorescence labeling of the guard cells of stomatain vivo (Arabidopsis (Col-0) plant)[49]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i030Abg/GBND330/450no cytotoxicity in non-Abg encoding E. coli, moderate cytotoxicity in Abg encoding E. coli; both probes can be used for cell sortingin cellulo (E. coli R1360 cells, P. pastoris cells)[49]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i031GLB>650×525/560kcat = 3.38 s−1,
KM = 16.9 µM;
moderate cytotoxicity, better labeling efficiency than the difluoroderivative, cross-labeling with other proteins
in cellulo (HEK-lacZ(+) cells), ex vivo (Drosophila melanogaster and mice)[53,60]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i032GLB>210×525/560kcat = 8.0 s−1,
KM = 29.6 µM;
low labeling efficiency
in vitro[53]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i033GLB>150×610/630reduced reactivity of the quinone-methide leads to leaking of the probe from the cellsin cellulo (HEK-lacZ(+) cells)[55]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i034GLB>150×610/630cross-labeling with other proteinsin cellulo (HEK-lacZ(+) cells, ex vivo (Drosophila melanogaster and mice)[55]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i035GLBNA d525/560modulated photosensitizer, selective ablation of lacZ(+) cells,
kcat = 3.32 s−1,
KM = 10.1 µM
in vitro (HEK-lacZ(+) cells, ex vivo and in vivo (Drosophila melanogaster and mice)[56]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i036GLB>200×416/454much higher fluorescence compared to the 8-difluoromethyl analogue, low cytotoxicity, cross-labeling with other proteinsin cellulo (HEK-lacZ(+), HeLa and CT26.CL25 cells)[58]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i037GLBND352/454low fluorescence upon hydrolysis by GLBin cellulo (HEK-lacZ(+) and CT26.CL25 cells)[58]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i038GLB~200×323/460kcat = 54 min−1,
Km = 0.062 μM
fluorescent detection of cell surface antigens using GLB labeled antibody
in cellulo (A549 cells)[59]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i039GLBND330/450inactivates the enzyme,
no cross-labeling in cell lysate
in vitro[61]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i040GBND330/450inactivates the enzyme,
no cross-labeling in cell lysate
in vitro[61]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i041HEXND330/450inactivates the enzyme,
no cross-labeling in cell lysate
low cytotoxicity
the alkyne enables subsequent attachment of an affinity tag for protein isolation
in cellulo
(HT-29 cells)
[61]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i042GLBND330/450moderate enzyme inactivation, low labeling efficiencyin vitro[61]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i043GBND330/450moderate enzyme inactivation, low labeling efficiencyin vitro[61]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i044GLBND650/710hydrolyzes in bufferin vitro[64]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i045GLB16×650/710kcat = 14.6 s−1,
Km = 9.3 μM
more stable in buffer than the monofluoro derivative, low cytotoxicity
in cellulo (CT26.CL25, HeLa, MDA-MB-231, MCF7, IMR-90 cells), in vivo (mice)[64]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b enzyme abbreviations: GLB: β-galactosidase, NAGA: α-N-acetyl-galactosaminidase, GUSB: β-glucuronidase, Abg: Agrobacterium sp. β-glucosidase/galactosidase, GB: β-glucosidase, FUCA: α-l-fucosidase, HEX: β-N-acetylhexosaminidase. c approximate absorption and emission maxima. d modulated photosensitizer
Table 6. Activity-based probes for neuraminidases.
Table 6. Activity-based probes for neuraminidases.
Structure aTurn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bKineticsNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i046NANDKi = 1.90 mM
t1/2 = 2.83 min
inactivates the enzymein vitro[66]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i047110×580/610NDcross-labeling with other proteinsin cellulo (A549, HeLa, HepG2, MCF-7, U2OS, Huh-7)[67]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i048ND360/470KM = 2.4 μM ccannot differentiate endogenous MDCK sialidase and viral sialidasein cellulo (MDCK cells)[68]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i049ND360/470NDlower fluorescence in cellulo compared to the deacetylated probein cellulo (MDCK cells)[68]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i050ND360/470NDonly hydrolyzed by viral sialidase, lower fluorescence in cellulo compared to the deacetylated probein cellulo (MDCK cells)[68]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i051ND360/470KM = 159 μM donly hydrolyzed by viral sialidasein cellulo (MDCK cells)[68]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima. c determined using NedA Micromonospora viridifaciens. d determined using H3N2 (A/Hong Kong /1/68) neuraminidase.
Table 7. Activity-based probes for γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase.
Table 7. Activity-based probes for γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase.
Structure aTurn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i05240×690/715cross-labeling with other protein, no cytotoxicityin cellulo (HepG2, U87MG)
in vivo (mouse)
[69]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i053>500×530/565cross-labeling with other protein, no loss of enzyme activityin cellulo (SHIN3 A549, MIA PaCa-2, HepG2)
in vivo (mouse)
[70]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima.
Table 8. Activity-based probes for different sulfatases.
Table 8. Activity-based probes for different sulfatases.
Structure aTarget EnzymeTurn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied
System
Ref.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i054PARS
KARS
STS
NA490/520inactivates PARS, KARS and STS, ARSG not affected; cross-labeling in cell lysatein vitro[72]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i055STS360/465inactivates STS, cross-labeling not studiedin cellulo (CHO/STS)[73]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i056STSNA360/465hydrolyzed by STS, but non-fluorescent side product both in vitro and in celluloin cellulo (CHO/STS)[73]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i057Sulfatase from Aerobacter aerogenes330/480cross-labeling not studiedin vitro[74]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima.
Table 9. Activity-based probes for β-lactamases.
Table 9. Activity-based probes for β-lactamases.
Structure aTurn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bkcat (min−1)KM (μM)NotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i05838×490/5204.923.08no loss of enzyme activity,
cross-labeling not studied
in cellulo (E. coli, B. cereus, MRSA, S. aureus)[75] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i059110×525/5702.164.28no loss of enzyme activity, cross-labeling not studiedin cellulo (E. coli, B. cereus, MRSA, S. aureus)[75] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i06080×650/6801.495.24no loss of enzyme activity, cross-labeling not studiedin cellulo (E. coli, B. cereus, MRSA, S. aureus)[75] c
Chemosensors 11 00155 i06150×365/460NDNDhydrolyzed by β-lactamase but weak fluorescence in celluloin cellulo (E. coli)[76]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i062<50×365/460NDNDcross-labeling not studiedin cellulo (E. coli, MDR A. baumannii, K. pneumonia)[76]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima. c for details of the structures, see Figure 18.
Table 10. Activity-based probes for other enzymes.
Table 10. Activity-based probes for other enzymes.
Structure aTarget
Enzyme
Turn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i063AtCXE1210×335/540cross-labeling with TaGSTL1 having a reactive Cys residue, no cross-labeling with BSA in vitro[77]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i064esteraseNA375/445low cytotoxicity,
cross-labeling not studied
in cellulo (HeLA, 3T3, A549, B16F10, Huh-7, U2OS and Raw 264.7)[78]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i065esteraseNA495/520low cytotoxicity,
cross-labeling not studied
in cellulo (HeLA, 3T3, A549, B16F10, Huh-7, U2OS and Raw 264.7)[78]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i066esteraseNA550/575low cytotoxicity,
in cellulo cross-labeling
in cellulo (HeLA, 3T3, A549, B16F10, Huh-7, U2OS and Raw 264.7)[78]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i067nitro-reductase10×520/560low cytotoxicity,
no cross-labeling
in cellulo (A459)
in vivo (zebrafish)
[79]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima.
Table 11. ROS probes.
Table 11. ROS probes.
Structure aROSTurn-On
Ratio
λ (nm) abs/em bNotesStudied SystemRef.
Chemosensors 11 00155 i068H2O2, ONOONA360/470in vitro model compoundin vitro[83]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i069H2O2, ONOOND490/520minor cellular toxicity, localized in vesicular organelles (phagosomes, endosomes, lysosomes, and autophagosomes)in cellulo (Raw 264.7)
ex-vivo (mouse brain tissue)
[83]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i070H2O225×490/520minor cellular toxicity, no specific localizationin cellulo (HeLA, A431, Raw 264.7, microglia-neuron cocultures)[84]
Chemosensors 11 00155 i071H2O2, ONOO, 1O2, O2, OH30–70×350/530low cytotoxicity, highly localized in mitochondria and ER, can be used in two-photon microscopyin cellulo (HeLA, Raw 264.7)
ex-vivo (mouse kidney tissue)
[85]
a fluorophores are colored according to the approximate emission maxima of the emissive form of the dye. b approximate absorption and emission maxima.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kern, D.; Kormos, A. Self-Immobilizing Quinone Methides for the Fluorescent Sensing of Enzyme Activity. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11030155

AMA Style

Kern D, Kormos A. Self-Immobilizing Quinone Methides for the Fluorescent Sensing of Enzyme Activity. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(3):155. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11030155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kern, Dóra, and Attila Kormos. 2023. "Self-Immobilizing Quinone Methides for the Fluorescent Sensing of Enzyme Activity" Chemosensors 11, no. 3: 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11030155

APA Style

Kern, D., & Kormos, A. (2023). Self-Immobilizing Quinone Methides for the Fluorescent Sensing of Enzyme Activity. Chemosensors, 11(3), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11030155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop