Next Article in Journal
Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 as a Potential Marker of Local Myocardial Inflammation in Myocardial Infarction: Morphologic Data on Distribution in Infarcted and Normal Human Myocardium
Previous Article in Journal
Resveratrol Effect on α-Lactalbumin Thermal Stability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preoperative Ultrasonography Predicts Level II Lymph Node Metastasis in N1b Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Implications for Surgical Planning
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/biomedicines12102177
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Benefits and Doubts in the Era of Thyroid Lobectomy

by
Jacopo Zocchi
1,
Gioacchino Giugliano
1,
Chiara Mossinelli
1,
Cecilia Mariani
1,
Giacomo Pietrobon
1,*,
Francesco Bandi
1,
Stefano Malpede
2,
Enrica Grosso
1,
Marco Federico Manzoni
3,
Elvio De Fiori
4,
Giovanni Mauri
5,
Manila Rubino
3,
Marta Tagliabue
1 and
Mohssen Ansarin
1
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bassini Hospital, ASST Nord Milano, 20092 Cinisello Balsamo, Italy
3
Onco-Endocrinology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
5
Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(10), 2177; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102177
Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Revised: 19 September 2024 / Accepted: 20 September 2024 / Published: 25 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Thyroid Cancer)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: Surgery is still the main line of treatment for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with a current trend for de-intensified treatment based on an excellent prognosis. The role of a routine prophylactic central neck dissection (PCND) is still debated as its impact on oncologic outcomes has never been cleared by a randomized clinical trial. In this study, we aimed to report our long-standing experience in PCND and its potential contemporary role in the treatment of PTC. Methods: A retrospective institutional review was performed on all patients who underwent operation for PTC including PCND between 1998 and 2021. The primary outcomes were the rate of central lymph node metastases (CLNMs), cancer recurrence and incidence of complications. Survivals were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 657 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up of 78 months (48–114 months). Two hundred and one patients presented occult CLNMs (30.6%). The presence of a pathological node represented the unique reason for a completion thyroidectomy and I131 therapy in 12.5% of the population. Age lower than 55 years, microscopic or macroscopic extra-thyroid extension (ETE) and multifocality were independent factors predicting CLNMs. The rate of recurrence in the whole population was 2.7% (18 patients). Five-year and ten-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 96.5% (94.7–97.7) and 93.3% (90.3–95.5), respectively. Two patients relapsed in the central neck compartment (0.3%). Age (>55 years), pathological staging (pT) and extranodal extension (ENE) were independent factors associated with a worse DFS. The rate of temporary and permanent vocal fold palsy was 12.8% and 1.8%, respectively, and did not depend on the type of surgical procedure performed. Hypoparathyroidism was temporary in 42.2% and permanent in 11.9% of the patients. A sub-analysis upon cT1b-T2 patients treated primarily with thyroid lobectomy and ipsilateral PCND demonstrated a 2.6% rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism. Conclusions: PCND allows for a high disease-free survival and a proper selection of patients needing adjuvant treatment, in particular, those treated with a unilateral procedure. On the other hand, bilateral approach is burdened by a not-neglectable rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism.

1. Introduction

Treatment for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has undergone important changes in recent years. We observed a shift towards less intensive and invasive treatments owing to encouraging results reported by several institutional experiences [1,2]. Thyroid lobectomy (TL) substituted total thyroidectomy (TT) for selected (T1a–T1b–T2, N0) tumors and has been incorporated in national and international guidelines as a good clinical practice [3,4,5]. Indication for iodine radiotherapy has been reduced and now reserved for American Thyroid Association (ATA) intermediate- and high-risk group patients and selected low-risk patients [3].
In this context characterized by a tendency toward conservative and minimally invasive therapeutical strategy, the adoption of prophylactic central neck dissection (PCND) remains controversial. The rate of occult central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in PTC is reported to be high, with some series reporting up to 80% of cases [6]. Owing to this high percentage, many authors support a routine use of PCND that guarantees a lower local recurrence rate [7], a lower rate of re-operation [8] and a proper pathological staging, and thus a correct selection of patients who need adjuvant treatment [9]. On the other hand, the impact on survival outcomes is reported to be neglectable, making the utility of PCND still debated [10,11]. At the same time, the use of PCND seems to be burdened by a higher rate of post-operative complications, in particular, permanent hypocalcemia [12].
At the European Oncologic Institute (IEO) IRCCS, we have adopted PCND since 2001 with the purpose of maximizing the locoregional control of disease and reaching a correct and precise pathological staging.
In consideration of our long-standing experience with PCND and the adoption of a standardized and reproducible technique [13], with this work, we report the incidence of CLNMs, the oncological outcomes and the complication rate in a population of patients treated for PTC and PCND. In particular, we focus on the evolution of the indications during the last decade, with the increased adoption of TL, in order to contribute to the understanding of the contemporary role of the PCND.

2. Methods

This is a retrospective single-center cohort study approved by the European Institute of Oncology Ethics Committee (IEO CODE: IEO2044). We selected a population of patients affected by PTC and treated by surgery, in a period going from 1998 to 2021. All patients underwent central neck dissection (CND), either prophylactic or therapeutic, unilateral or bilateral according to the clinical tumor stage.
Patients with the following characteristics were excluded from our analysis: age lower than 18 years, benign disease, previous thyroid treatment, histological type other than PTC, pT4 stage, presence of lateral neck metastases or distant metastasis at diagnosis, and follow-up <18 months.
Through the years, an ultrasound (US) study was performed by a senior radiologist in all patients who were candidates for treatment of thyroid cancer at our institute. According to the anatomically standardized IEO surgical procedure [13], a prophylactic central neck dissection was routinely performed on cN0 patients if the fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) on the thyroid nodule was TIR3b/TIR4/TIR5 according to the Italian cytologic classification [14], corresponding, respectively, to the Bethesda IV, V and VI diagnostic categories [15]. The surgery consisted of TT or TL according to the tumor size and extension, number of nodules, US central lymph nodal status and patients’ characteristics. These indications changed according to the cumulating evidence of the past years (Table 1). Since 2015, after an internal audit, we have adopted TL and ipsilateral PCND for low-risk tumors (i.e., unilateral unifocal cT1-T2 with no evidence of extrathyroid extension and/or of neck node metastases at the preoperative institutional US). In any other cases, TT was the first choice, along with unilateral or bilateral prophylactic or therapeutic central neck dissection. Moreover, in 2018, we started to use thermal ablation or active surveillance in case of microcarcinoma [16], with the exception of nodules abutting the thyroid capsule or the region of the inferior laryngeal nerve or the esophagus.
The final decision about the extent of surgery was determined by a decision-making discussion in a multidisciplinary team and later shared with the patient.
After surgery, patients belonging to intermediate- and high-risk ATA group underwent I131 according to current guidelines [3,5,17]. In case of TL, the presence of central neck macrometastases or >5 micromestases and evidence of a T3 disease represent the contemporary indication for completion thyroidectomy and subsequent radioactive iodine ablation (RAI).
The following patients’ demographics, surgical and histopathologic details were retrieved from a thyroid dedicated IEO electronic database: age, sex, extension of surgery (TT vs. TL; unilateral vs. bilateral CND), histological result and pathological staging revised according to the 8th TNM staging [18], number and characteristics of CLNMs. Multifocality lesions were subdivided into three groups according to previous work [19]: multifocality confined to one thyroid lobe (group 1); unifocal lesion within each lobe (group 2); multifocality within both two lobes (group 3). The rate of post-surgical complications was retrieved as well (transient and permanent hypocalcemia; transient and permanent vocal cord paralysis). Permanent hypocalcemia was defined as the requirement of vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation for more than 6 months after surgery, established through parathormone and calcemia measurement. Permanent vocal cord paralysis was defined as a persistent paralysis at laryngeal endoscopic evaluation after 6 months.
A sub-analysis of selected clinical characteristics was performed upon patients with T1b and T2 carcinoma treated with TL with unilateral PCND.
Post-treatment surveillance includes physical examination, neck US, non-stimulated serum thyroglobulin, antithyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration every 6 months. I131 scan or whole-body scan tomography were used for patients treated with I131 after 12 months.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were described as absolute and relative frequencies, while continuous variables were summarized as a median and interquartile range (IQR).
Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate.
All survival outcomes were calculated starting from the date of surgery.
We considered the following survival endpoint:
-
Disease-free survival (DFS) includes all relapses of the thyroid disease and death from all causes.
-
Loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) includes local and/or regional relapse of the thyroid disease and death from all causes.
LRRFS was defined as a new lesion in the thyroidectomy bed or cervical LNs detected through clinical examination, neck US, increased thyroglobulin levels and confirmed using FNAC or histopathological samples from the re-intervention. Metastases were detected using I131 scans, computed tomography or positron emission tomography (PET).
Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The impact on survival of different clinical and pathological factors (sex, age, pathological (p)T, macroscopic extracapsular extension, multifocality, pN, extranodal extension) was investigated with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. A p-value < 0.05 was used as the threshold for statistical significance.
All statistical analyses were performed using R commander version 4.2.2, that is, a graphical user interface of R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

From a database of 2890 patients, a total of 657 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Descriptive results are summarized in Table 2. Briefly, the male–female ratio was 1:4 with a median age of 46.8 years. In most of cases, we performed a total thyroidectomy (66.8%). The central neck dissection was bilateral in 35.6% of cases. The majority of the population had a pT1a/b disease (80%). One hundred and thirty-one originally pT3 patients were re-staged as pT1 or pT2 according to the 8th TNM classification. Fifty-two patients who presented with clinical N1 (7.9%) and 13/52 (25%) were found to be negative (false positive). Pathological nodes were diagnosed in 240 of the 657 patients treated (36.5% of the population). In total, 41/240 patients (17.1%) had extranodal extension (ENE) and 64/240 had micrometastasis (26.6%). Ultimately, occult central node metastases were demonstrated in 201 patients of 657 (30.6%).
Age lower than 55 years, microscopic or macroscopic ETE and multifocality were found to be independent risk factors for CLNMs (Table 3).
I131 was administered to 307 patients (46.7%). The presence of CLNMs was the unique reason for an adjuvant treatment in 99 patients (15% of the total population). Of these, 81 patients (12.3%) were clinically N0, which means that they were upstaged after PCND. The presence of occult metastases in association with other pathological features (pT3, ETE, multifocality) represented the indication for I131 in 77 other patients (11.7%).
Median follow-up was 78 months (48-114 months). At the end of follow-up, of the 657 patients analyzed, 16 died of other causes and 1 of disease. In addition, 5-year and 10-year DFS were 96.5% (94.7–97.7) and 93.3% (90.3–95.5), respectively. We did not find a difference between DFS and LRRFS in terms of events. In multivariate analysis, age (>55 years), pathological staging (pT) and extranodal extension (ENE) were independent factors associated with a worse DFS (Table 4). The rate of recurrence in the whole population was 2.7% (18 patients): 4 in the contralateral lobe, 2 in the central neck compartment, 10 in the lateral neck, and 2 in the lungs. One patient died of disease due to lung metastasis 5 years after the first surgery.
The rate of temporary and permanent vocal fold palsy was 12.8% and 1.8%, respectively, and it did not depend on the type of surgical procedure performed. Hypoparathyroidism was temporary in 42.2% and permanent in 11.9% of the patients, and it was significantly associated with TT compared with TL (p < 0.001) and bilateral CND compared with unilateral (p < 0.001) (Table 5). At least one parathyroid was found in 334 pathological specimens (51%) in the whole population.
Considering only patients classified as pT1b or pT2 according to the 8th TNM staging, 115 were treated with TL and unilateral PCND. Occult neck metastases were revealed in 30/115 patients (26.1%). Twenty-one had macrometastases (18.3%) and underwent completion thyroidectomy and I131. In this population, only three suffered of persistent hypoparathyroidism (2.6%).

4. Discussion

The treatment of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma has been shifting towards more conservative approaches in the last decade [1,20], including active surveillance protocols [17,21,22] and image-guided thermal ablations [23] for very-low-risk cancer (unifocal intrathyroidal micropapillary carcinoma), while thyroid lobectomy has become the standard of care for clinical T1-T2 cancer [3,4,24,25].
With regard to central neck dissection for PTC, the role of a prophylactic procedure is still unproven and international guidelines are inconclusive, allowing each department to choose their strategy [5,17]. The 2015 ATA guidelines recommend a PCND in case of advanced tumors, clinically positive lateral neck nodes (cN1b), or if the lymph nodal status of the central compartment could be used for further treatment [3].
One of the main reasons for the lack of evidence is that studies comparing TT with PCND and TT alone have not had the statistical power to detect a difference in locoregional recurrence [26].
The arguments for and against PCND are known. Possible pros are as follows: better pathological staging for adjuvant treatment selection, association with lower post-surgical thyroglobulin (Tg) levels and effect on recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival. The cons are as follows: unnecessary upstaging of some tumors, undefined prognostic role, and reported greater morbidity in terms of transient hypoparathyroidism [8].
In 2001, as a result of an internal audit about patients with nodal disease recurrence after thyroidectomy, we decided to incorporate CND as a routine procedure in the treatment of PTC, mainly on account of its potential predictive value for disease recurrence and a better staging and optimization of post-operative treatment and follow-up [27]. Later, we standardized our surgical technique and proposed a new anatomic classification of the neck level VI [13], subdivided into A-B-C-D areas, demonstrating the feasibility and safeness of a prophylactic procedure.
In this paper, we report the two-decade-long surgical experience with the adoption of PCND in a standardized fashion. In a homogeneous population treated for PTC pT1-T3, we found that about 30% of patients harbor occult metastases. This CLNM rate is unsurprising and even lower compared to other published studies, reporting up to 82.4% of cases of occult metastases [6]. It also confirmed two previous experiences reported by our group [27,28]. As demonstrated by numerous papers, age < 55 [29,30], pT [31,32], extracapsular extension [33,34,35] and multifocality have been shown to represent independent risk factors for central node metastases in PTC. Interestingly, even differentiating between various kind of multifocal presentation, we were not able to demonstrate a different metastasis rate in the three different kinds of multifocal disease, contrary to that found in the work of Heng et al. These authors observed a clinical impact in case of multifocality in at least one lobe, while unifocality in the two lobes did not correlate with CLNMs [19]. Despite a trend towards a major CLNM prevalence (40% vs. 29%), male sex did not impact significantly upon the CLNM rate, as described in other works [30,36,37]. Some of these risk factors have been grouped in nomograms with the purpose of selecting patients to be treated with PCND [30], incorporating, from time to time, other factors such as BRAF mutations [38] or the presence of US nodular calcifications or TgAb [39]. Nevertheless, most of these factors are available only after surgery and, for this reason, different groups are experimenting US nomograms models for better patient stratification with encouraging results [40].
We report a 96.5% 5-year DFS (94.7–97.7). With a median follow-up of 78 months, only 18 of 657 patients presented disease recurrence (2.7%). Of these, only two patients experienced a central neck compartment relapse, which is an extraordinarily low rate (0.3%) and confirms the high value of locoregional control of the PCND, which avoids re-operations and their associated higher rate of complications [41].
Considering our routine use of PCND, our result cannot be compared to a control group. One of the few prospective clinical trials presented in the literature comparing two groups (with or without PCND) did not find statistical difference in LRRFS in 181 patients (8% vs. 7.5%) [42]. Nevertheless, the group treated with only a thyroidectomy required a higher number of I131 courses (27.4% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.002) because of the evidence of elevated basal or stimulated Tg or for the presence of structural disease.
Another retrospective study comparing two homogeneous low-risk groups treated with and without PCND, selected through a score-matching system, did not find a significant difference in terms of local control. The reported rate of recurrence in these selected groups was too low to find any discrepancy (structural recurrence rate in two cases in the PCND vs. four cases 7.4% in the non-PCND) [43]. A different meta-analysis upon retrospective observational studies showed a significantly reduced locoregional recurrence rate for the TT with the PCND group compared with the TT group [6,44,45], while the only meta-analysis upon five randomized trial studies including 763 patients, predominantly with low-risk PTC, did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect of PCND on locoregional and biochemical recurrence [46]. Clearly, in a setting of low-level and conflicting evidence, answers could depend on the data interpretation and the weight given to the risks and benefits [47], and only ongoing clinical trials would bring stronger evidence in this debate [48].
Focusing on surgical complications, we report an overall 1.8% of permanent vocal cord palsy rate, which is in line with the published literature [6] and confirms the safety of this procedure for recurrent nerve integrity. On the other hand, we observed an overall 11.9% permanent hypocalcemia rate. This is a not-neglectable percentage, different from other published works, that prompts a few considerations. First, the definition of permanent hypocalcemia varies between studies in the literature. In our analysis, we included both groups of patients requiring either therapy with vitamin D alone or with calcium. Of 78 patients affected by post-operative hypoparathyroidism, 46 (59%) required a vitamin D integration only. In the literature, the permanent hypoparathyroidism rate varies between groups submitted to PCND: Hartl in 2012 reported a 0.6% rate in 317 patients, but the criteria for hypoparathyroidism definition were not known [37]. Popadich reported a 9.7% rate, adopting our definition [49]. In the work by Viola, persistent hypoparathyroidism was observed in 8% of patients in the group treated with TT alone compared to 19.4% in the group treated with PCND [42]. Despite a careful anatomical procedure, it is known that more extensive dissection in the central neck may interfere with the blood supply to the parathyroid glands, particularly the inferior ones [50]. Moreover, we found at least one parathyroid gland in more than half of the pathological specimens, highlighting a possible discerning difficulty between parathyroid and adipose tissue during the dissection itself. We tried to identify a possible trend in complications during the study period, but, in the end, we did not find any difference.
Through the refinement of surgical indications according to the update guidelines, we now reserve a conservative approach for cT1a diseases, adopting thermal ablations for single nodules without capsule involvement, waiting for new studies that will show the feasibility of this technique even for nodules larger than 1 cm or with capsule microinvasion. In this particular subgroup (T1a), we experienced only 3 of 123 relapses, all in the contralateral lobe. TL with unilateral PCND is employed in case of cT1b-T2 cN0 carcinoma. Hence, compared to other international experiences, we now differ only in this selected subgroup of patients, who take advantage of a unilateral resection. In our institute, cT3 lesions are always treated with TT and PCND, as indicated in most of the guidelines [3]. In the low-risk group (cT1b-T2), we observed a 26% rate of occult metastases. Interestingly, only 2.6% of these patients suffered from a persistent hypoparathyroidism.
Twelve percent of our patients were re-classified according to central nodal pathological stage after PCND and underwent iodine therapy. I131 was administered to 77 other patients (11.7%) for the presence of occult metastases in association with other pathological features (>pT2, ETE, multifocality). It is known that patients undergoing PCND are more prone to be selected for iodine therapy, as shown by Zhao in his meta-analysis (74.6% in the TT with PCND group vs. 59.9% in the TT group, OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04–1.39) [6]. Despite a trend towards a reduction in the use of I131, the current guidelines still recommend adjuvant treatment for intermediate- and high-risk patients [3,5]. The presence of one macroscopic central node or more than five micrometastasic nodes (<2mm) leaves patients at intermediate risk of recurrence [3] and this is a reason for offering RAI regardless of age and stage [4,51]. Different papers deal with the risk of unnecessary upstaging and excessive use of iodine therapy, which could be associated with potential drawbacks from radiation, such as recurrent sialoadenitis, salivary gland swelling and increased risk of second primary malignancies in the long term [52]. Moreover, ongoing studies are trying to assess the real usefulness of adjuvant treatment in case of central neck pathological nodes [53]. Nevertheless, based on the current scientific knowledge, definitions such as “unnecessary upstaging” and “subclinical lymph nodes” attributed to occult node metastasis in PTC are questionable: leaving out the group of micrometastases, a lymph node is pathological independently on the means to detect it (US vs. PCND), and we have no justification for a different consideration, especially if we take into account the low sensitivity of US. For this reason, we can deem PCND not only a therapeutic procedure, but also a diagnostic and prognostic tool while waiting for future stronger evidence and updated guidelines. This is particularly interesting in case of diseases that are currently treated with TL: in our experience, almost 20% of patients in the cT1b-T2 group were upstaged after PCND, and they were selected for surgical totalization and adjuvant treatment.
We cannot ignore some limitations of our study, including the monocentric nature and retrospective analysis with potential selection, observational and data collection biases. Another limitation is the relatively small sample size and the absence of a control group. On the other hand, we report a long-standing standardized experience in a homogeneous group of patients and a helpful insight through the evolution of the surgical procedure.

5. Conclusions

Our results confirm the excellent results of adopting a routine use of PCND in terms of local control of the disease. Persistent hypoparathyroidism is a possible drawback of PCND, but this limit can be overcome through a further refining of patient selection. PCND is a safe procedure in case of T1b-T2 unilateral tumors and allows for a proper staging and selection of patients who necessitate adjuvant treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z., G.G., M.F.M., E.D.F., G.M., M.T. and M.A.; Data Curation, J.Z., C.M. (Chiara Mossinelli), G.P., F.B. and M.T.; Investigation, C.M. (Chiara Mossinelli), C.M. (Cecilia Mariani), F.B., S.M., E.G. and M.R.; Methodology, J.Z., C.M. (Chiara Mossinelli) and G.P.; Software, C.M. (Chiara Mossinelli) and G.P.; Supervision, M.A.; Writing—Original Draft, J.Z., C.M. (Cecilia Mariani) and M.R.; Writing—Review and Editing, G.G., M.F.M., E.D.F., G.M., M.T. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Istituto Europeo Oncologico (protocol code IEO2044).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy and ethical reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest and have no financial relationships to disclose.

References

  1. Hartl, D.M.; Guerlain, J.; Breuskin, I.; Hadoux, J.; Baudin, E.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Terroir-Cassou-Mounat, M.; Lamartina, L.; Leboulleux, S. Thyroid Lobectomy for Low to Intermediate Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Filippo, L.; Giugliano, G.; Tagliabue, M.; Gandini, S.; Sileo, F.; Allora, A.; Grosso, E.; Proh, M.; Basso, V.; Scaglione, D.; et al. Total thyroidectomy versus lobectomy: Surgical approach to T1-T2 papillary thyroid cancer. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2020, 40, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haugen, B.R. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What is new and what has changed? Cancer 2017, 123, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Filetti, S.; Durante, C.; Hartl, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Locati, L.D.; Newbold, K.; Papotti, M.G.; Berruti, A.; the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1856–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pacini, F.; Basolo, F.; Bellantone, R.; Boni, G.; Cannizzaro, M.A.; De Palma, M.; Durante, C.; Elisei, R.; Fadda, G.; Frasoldati, A.; et al. Italian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer: Joint statements of six Italian societies. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2018, 41, 849–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, W.; You, L.; Hou, X.; Chen, S.; Ren, X.; Chen, G.; Zhao, Y. The Effect of Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection on Locoregional Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Cancer after Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: pCND for the Locoregional Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 24, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yazıcı, D.; Çolakoğlu, B.; Sağlam, B.; Sezer, H.; Kapran, Y.; Aydın, Ö.; Demirkol, M.O.; Alagöl, F.; Terzioğlu, T. Effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on the surgical outcomes in papillary thyroid cancer: Experience in a single center. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 277, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hartl, D.M.; Mamelle, E.; Borget, I.; Leboulleux, S.; Mirghani, H.; Schlumberger, M. Influence of prophylactic neck dissection on rate of retreatment for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J. Surg. 2013, 37, 1951–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barczyński, M.; Konturek, A.; Stopa, M.; Nowak, W. Prophylactic central neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2013, 100, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asimakopoulos, P.; Shaha, A.R.; Nixon, I.J.; Shah, J.P.; Randolph, G.W.; Angelos, P.; Zafereo, M.E.; Kowalski, L.P.; Hartl, D.M.; Olsen, K.D.; et al. Management of the Neck in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 23, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mamelle, E.; Borget, I.; Leboulleux, S.; Mirghani, H.; Suárez, C.; Pellitteri, P.K.; Shaha, A.R.; Hamoir, M.; Robbins, K.T.; Khafif, A.; et al. Impact of prophylactic central neck dissection on oncologic outcomes of papillary thyroid carcinoma: A review. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 272, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dismukes, J.; Fazendin, J.; Obiarinze, R.; Márquez, G.C.H.; Ramonell, K.M.; Buczek, E.; Lindeman, B.; Chen, H. Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: All Risks, No Reward. J. Surg. Res. 2021, 264, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Giugliano, G.; Proh, M.; Gibelli, B.; Grosso, E.; Tagliabue, M.; De Fiori, E.; Maffini, F.; Chiesa, F.; Ansarin, M. Central neck dissection in differentiated thyroid cancer: Technical notes. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2014, 34, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Fadda, G.; Basolo, F.; Bondi, A.; Bussolati, G.; Crescenzi, A.; Nappi, O.; Nardi, F.; Papotti, M.; Taddei, G.; Palombini, L.; et al. Cytological classification of thyroid nodules. Proposal of the SIAPEC-IAP Italian Consensus Working Group. Pathologica 2010, 102, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Cibas, E.S.; Ali, S.Z. The Bethesda System For Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2009, 132, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mauri, G.; Orsi, F.; Carriero, S.; Della Vigna, P.; De Fiori, E.; Monzani, D.; Pravettoni, G.; Grosso, E.; Manzoni, M.F.; Ansarin, M.; et al. Image-Guided Thermal Ablation as an Alternative to Surgery for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Preliminary Results of an Italian Experience. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 575152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Durante, C.; Attard, M.; Torlontano, M.; Ronga, G.; Monzani, F.; Costante, G.; Ferdeghini, M.; Tumino, S.; Meringolo, D.; Bruno, R.; et al. Identification and optimal postsurgical follow-up of patients with very low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4882–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.B. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume xvii, 1024p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Heng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Lin, J.; Liu, Q.; Cai, W.; Tao, L. Risks of central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma with or without multifocality in at least one lobe: A multi-center analysis. Oral. Oncol. 2022, 134, 106185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gibelli, B.; Dionisio, R.; Ansarin, M. Role of hemithyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid cancer. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 2015, 23, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ito, Y.; Miyauchi, A.; Oda, H. Low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: A review of active surveillance trials. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 44, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Miyauchi, A. Clinical Trials of Active Surveillance of Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid. World J. Surg. 2016, 40, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ha, S.M.; Sung, J.Y.; Baek, J.H.; Na, D.G.; Kim, J.H.; Yoo, H.; Lee, D.; Whan Choi, D. Radiofrequency ablation of small follicular neoplasms: Initial clinical outcomes. Int. J. Hyperth. 2017, 33, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adam, M.A.; Pura, J.; Gu, L.; Dinan, M.A.; Tyler, D.S.; Reed, S.D.; Scheri, R.; Roman, S.A.; Sosa, J.A. Extent of surgery for papillary thyroid cancer is not associated with survival: An analysis of 61,775 patients. Ann. Surg. 2014, 260, 601–605; discussion 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Song, E.; Han, M.; Oh, H.S.; Kim, W.W.; Jeon, M.J.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, T.Y.; Chung, K.W.; Kim, W.B.; Shong, Y.K.; et al. Lobectomy Is Feasible for 1–4 cm Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas: A 10-Year Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis on Recurrence. Thyroid 2019, 29, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carling, T.; Carty, S.E.; Ciarleglio, M.M.; Cooper, D.S.; Doherty, G.M.; Kim, L.T.; Kloos, R.T.; Mazzaferri, E.L.; Peduzzi, P.N.; Roman, S.A.; et al. American Thyroid Association design and feasibility of a prospective randomized controlled trial of prophylactic central lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2012, 22, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Costa, S.; Giugliano, G.; Santoro, L.; Ywata De Carvalho, A.; Massaro, M.A.; Gibelli, B.; De Fiori, E.; Grosso, E.; Ansarin, M.; Calabrese, L. Role of prophylactic central neck dissection in cN0 papillary thyroid cancer. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2009, 29, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tagliabue, M.; Giugliano, G.; Mariani, M.C.; Rubino, M.; Grosso, E.; Chu, F.; Calastri, A.; Maffini, F.A.; Mauri, G.; De Fiori, E.; et al. Prevalence of Central Compartment Lymph Node Metastases in Papillary Thyroid Micro-Carcinoma: A Retrospective Evaluation of Predictive Preoperative Features. Cancers 2021, 13, 6028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, J.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Lin, X.; Du, J.; Zhao, G.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z. Identification of risk factors of central lymph node metastasis and evaluation of the effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on migration of staging and risk stratification in patients with clinically node-negative papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Bull. Cancer 2017, 104, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, X.; Min, Y.; Feng, Y.; He, D.; Zeng, X.; Huang, Y.; Fan, S.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Xiang, K.; et al. Development and validation of an individualized nomogram for predicting the high-volume (>5) central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2022, 45, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ito, Y.; Jikuzono, T.; Higashiyama, T.; Asahi, S.; Tomoda, C.; Takamura, Y.; Miya, A.; Kobayashi, K.; Matsuzuka, F.; Kuma, K.; et al. Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis of thyroid papillary carcinoma located in one lobe. World J. Surg. 2006, 30, 1821–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Q.; Chu, B.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhuang, M.; Yang, Y. Clinical analysis of prophylactic central neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2014, 16, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, L.Y.; Liu, Z.W.; Liu, Y.W.; Gao, W.S.; Zheng, C.J. Risk Factors for Nodal Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 3361–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, S.K.; Park, I.; Woo, J.W.; Lee, J.H.; Choe, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.S. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 23, 2866–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Siddiqui, S.; White, M.G.; Antic, T.; Grogan, R.H.; Angelos, P.; Kaplan, E.L.; Cipriani, N.A. Clinical and Pathologic Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Thyroid 2016, 26, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, Y.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, J.; Chen, Y.; Jin, L.; Guo, G.; Zhang, X.; Ye, T. Prediction of central compartment lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 2014, 81, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hartl, D.M.; Leboulleux, S.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Baudin, E.; Chami, L.; Schlumberger, M.; Travagli, J.P. Optimization of staging of the neck with prophylactic central and lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2012, 255, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Z.; Chang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Du, G.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Yin, D. A Clinical Predictive Model of Central Lymph Node Metastases in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 856278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, X.; Luo, W.; He, L.; Cheng, J.; Yang, L. Predictors and a Prediction Model for Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (cN0). Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 789310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, C.; Cong, S.; Liang, T.; Feng, Z.; Gan, K.; Zhou, R.; Guo, Y.; Luo, S.; Liang, K.; Wang, Q. Development and validation of an ultrasound-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of cervical central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Gland. Surg. 2020, 9, 956–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roh, J.L.; Park, J.Y.; Rha, K.S.; Park, C.I. Is central neck dissection necessary for the treatment of lateral cervical nodal recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma? Head. Neck 2007, 29, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Viola, D.; Materazzi, G.; Valerio, L.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Faviana, P.; Seccia, V.; Sensi, E.; Romei, C.; Piaggi, P.; et al. Prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: Clinical implications derived from the first prospective randomized controlled single institution study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jin, S.H.; Kim, I.S.; Ji, Y.B.; Song, C.M.; Chung, M.S.; Tae, K. Efficacy of prophylactic central neck dissection in hemithyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 277, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lang, B.H.; Wong, K.P.; Wan, K.Y.; Lo, C.Y. Impact of routine unilateral central neck dissection on preablative and postablative stimulated thyroglobulin levels after total thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 19, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Yang, S.; Li, K.; Zhao, W.; Hu, X. The effectiveness and safety of prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 1094012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sanabria, A.; Betancourt-Agüero, C.; Sánchez-Delgado, J.G.; García-Lozano, C. Prophylactic Central Neck Lymph Node Dissection in Low-risk Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Does Not Decrease the Incidence of Locoregional Recurrence: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Ann. Surg. 2022, 276, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McHenry, C.R. Is Prophylactic Central Compartment Neck Dissection Indicated for Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Cancer: The Answer is Dependent on How the Data are Interpreted and the Weight Given to the Risks and Benefits. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 25, 3123–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hartl, D.; Godbert, Y.; Carrat, X.; Bardet, S.; Lasne-Cardon, A.; Vera, P.; Ilies, E.; Zerdoud, S.; Sarini, J.; Zalzali, M.; et al. ESTIMation of the ABiLity of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection to modify outcomes in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: A prospective randomized trial. Trials 2023, 24, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Popadich, A.; Levin, O.; Lee, J.C.; Smooke-Praw, S.; Ro, K.; Fazel, M.; Arora, A.; Tolley, N.S.; Palazzo, F.; Learoyd, D.L.; et al. A multicenter cohort study of total thyroidectomy and routine central lymph node dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery 2011, 150, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hou, D.; Xu, H.; Yuan, B.; Liu, J.; Lu, Y.; Liu, M.; Qian, Z. Effects of active localization and vascular preservation of inferior parathyroid glands in central neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 18, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Verburg, F.A.; Aktolun, C.; Chiti, A.; Frangos, S.; Giovanella, L.; Hoffmann, M.; Iakovou, I.; Mihailovic, J.; Krause, B.J.; Langsteger, W.; et al. Why the European Association of Nuclear Medicine has declined to endorse the 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, S.L. Complications of radioactive iodine treatment of thyroid carcinoma. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2010, 8, 1277–1286; quiz 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nixon, I.J.; Shah, J.P.; Zafereo, M.; Simo, R.S.; Hay, I.D.; Suárez, C.; Zbären, P.; Rinaldo, A.; Sanabria, A.; Silver, C.; et al. The role of radioactive iodine in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer—An oncologic surgical perspective. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 46, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Current treatment policy adopted at the Istituto Europeo Oncologico.
Table 1. Current treatment policy adopted at the Istituto Europeo Oncologico.
StagingPolicy
cT1a, cN0
  • Active surveillance
  • Thermal ablation
  • Thyroid lobectomy + ipsilateral central neck dissection
cT1b/cT2, cN0
  • Thyroid lobectomy + ipsilateral central neck dissection
cT1a/cT1b/cT2, cN1a
  • Total thyroidectomy + ipsilateral central neck dissection
cT3, cN0/cN1a
  • Total thyroidectomy + ipsilateral central neck dissection
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of the study cohort (657 patients).
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of the study cohort (657 patients).
Sex (%)F521 (79.3)
M136 (20.7)
Age (median, IQR) 46.8 [38.3, 55.8]
cN+ (central compartment) (%)No605 (92.1)
Yes52 (7.9)
Type of surgery (%)Thyroid lobectomy218 (33.2)
Total thyroidectomy439 (66.8)
pT 8th Ed AJCC (%)1a279 (42.5)
1b247 (37.6)
293 (14.2)
3a23 (3.5)
3b15 (2.3)
Microcarcinoma (%)No446 (67.9)
Yes211 (32.1)
Central neck dissection (%)Monolateral423 (64.4)
Bilateral234 (35.6)
Multifocality (%)No461 (70.2)
Yes196 (29.8)
Type of multifocality (%)Multi one lobe88 (44.9)
Single each lobe52 (26.5)
Multi each lobe56 (28.6)
pN (%)N0417 (63.5)
N1a240 (36.5)
Extranodal extension (% on pN+)No199 (82.9)
Yes41 (17.1)
Total nodes in the dissection (median, IQR) 6.00 [3.00, 9.00]
Node micromestasisYes64 (26.6)
Complication (%)No371 (56.5)
Yes286 (43.5)
Recurrent nerve section (%)No656 (99.8)
Yes1 (0.2)
Temporary vocal fold palsy (%)No573 (87.2)
Yes84 (12.8)
Permanent vocal fold palsy (%)No645 98.2)
Yes12 (1.8)
Temporary hypocalcemia (%)No380 (57.8)
Yes277 (42.2)
Permanent hypocalcemia (%)No576 (88.1)
Yes78 (11.9)
Completion thyroidectomy (%)No603 (91.8)
Yes54 (8.2)
Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy (%)No350 (53.3)
Yes307 (46.7)
RAI for pN+ (%)No465 (70.7)
Only for N99 (15.1)
N + other factors93 (14.2)
Recurrence (%)No639 (97.3)
Yes18 (2.7)
State of disease (%)NED636 (96.8)
AWD4 (0.6)
DOC16 (2.4)
DOD1 (0.0)
Follow-up, months (median, IQR) 75 [48, 114]
Legend: AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, IQR interquartile range.
Table 3. Association between pN and clinical/pathological variables.
Table 3. Association between pN and clinical/pathological variables.
pN0 (417)pN1 (240)p-Value
Sex (%)F336 (80.8)185 (77.1)0.317
M81 (19.2)55 (22.9)
Age categorized (%)≤55 years284 (68.3)194 (80.8)0.001
>55 years132 (31.7)46 (19.2)
Macroscopic extracapsular extension (%)No415 (99.5)227 (94.6)<0.001
Yes2 (0.5)13 (5.4)
Microscopic extracapsular extension (%) *No360 (86.7)181 (79.7)0.020
Yes55 (13.3)46 (20.3)
Multifocality (%)No308 (73.9)153 (63.7)0.008
Yes109 (26.1)87 (36.2)
Type of multifocality (%)Multi one lobe48 (44.0)40 (46.0)0.810
Single each lobe31 (28.4)21 (24.1)
Multi each lobe30 (27.5)26 (29.9)
* This analysis was conducted on the subgroup of patients without macroscopic extracapsular extension (642). Bold indicates results with significant impact.
Table 4. Cox proportional hazard models (univariable and multivariable).
Table 4. Cox proportional hazard models (univariable and multivariable).
Univariable Models
VariablesDFS
HRCI 95%p-Value
Sex
▪
F
1
▪
M
1.420.66–3.040.369
Age categorized
▪
≤55 years
1
▪
>55 years
2.931.49–5.750.002
pT <0.001
▪
T1
1
▪
T2
1.650.66–4.110.284
▪
T3a
10.104.01–25.43<0.001
▪
T3b
2.780.64–12.010.172
Multifocality
▪
No
1
▪
Yes
0.670.30–1.480.320
Macroscopic extracapsular extension
▪
No
1
▪
Yes
2.930.70–12.270.141
pN
▪
N0
1
▪
N1a
1.100.55–2.190.783
Extranodal extension
▪
No
1
▪
Yes
3.241.33–7.910.010
Multivariable Models
VariablesDFS
HRCI 95%p-Value
Age categorized
▪
≤55 y
1
▪
>55 y
3.061.51–6.200.002
pT <0.001
▪
T1
1
▪
T2
1.580.63–3.940.329
▪
T3a
7.142.76–18.48<0.001
▪
T3b
2.080.48–9.420.343
Extranodal extension
▪
No
1
▪
Yes
3.101.18–8.140.021
Legend: DFS = disease-free survival, HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval. Bold indicates results with significant impact.
Table 5. Association between type of surgery and complications.
Table 5. Association between type of surgery and complications.
Thyroid Lobectomy
(218)		Total Thyroidectomy
(439)		p-Value
Temporary
hypocalcemia		No213 (97.7)167 (38)<0.001
Yes5 (2.3)272 (62)
Permanent
hypocalcemia		No214 (98.2)362 (82.5)<0.001
Yes4 (1.8)74 (17.5)
Temporary vocal
fold palsy		No202 (92.7)371 (84.5)0.003
Yes16 (7.3)68 (15.5)
Permanent vocal
fold palsy		No217 (99.5)428 (97.5)0.117
Yes1 (0.5)11 (2.5)
Unilateral CND
(423)		Bilateral CND
(234)		p-Value
Temporary
hypocalcemia		No305 (72.1)75 (32.1)<0.001
Yes118 (27.9)159 (67.9)
Permanent
hypocalcemia		No388 (91.8)188 (80.3)<0.001
Yes33 (8.2)45 (19.7)
Temporary vocal
fold palsy		No373 (88.2)200 (85.5)0.331
Yes50 (11.8)34 (14.5)
Permanent vocal
fold palsy		No417 (98.6)228 (97.4)0.363
Yes6 (1.4)6 (2.6)
Bold indicates results with significant impact.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zocchi, J.; Giugliano, G.; Mossinelli, C.; Mariani, C.; Pietrobon, G.; Bandi, F.; Malpede, S.; Grosso, E.; Manzoni, M.F.; De Fiori, E.; et al. Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Benefits and Doubts in the Era of Thyroid Lobectomy. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102177

AMA Style

Zocchi J, Giugliano G, Mossinelli C, Mariani C, Pietrobon G, Bandi F, Malpede S, Grosso E, Manzoni MF, De Fiori E, et al. Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Benefits and Doubts in the Era of Thyroid Lobectomy. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(10):2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zocchi, Jacopo, Gioacchino Giugliano, Chiara Mossinelli, Cecilia Mariani, Giacomo Pietrobon, Francesco Bandi, Stefano Malpede, Enrica Grosso, Marco Federico Manzoni, Elvio De Fiori, and et al. 2024. "Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Benefits and Doubts in the Era of Thyroid Lobectomy" Biomedicines 12, no. 10: 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102177

APA Style

Zocchi, J., Giugliano, G., Mossinelli, C., Mariani, C., Pietrobon, G., Bandi, F., Malpede, S., Grosso, E., Manzoni, M. F., De Fiori, E., Mauri, G., Rubino, M., Tagliabue, M., & Ansarin, M. (2024). Central Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Benefits and Doubts in the Era of Thyroid Lobectomy. Biomedicines, 12(10), 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop