Next Article in Journal
Beneficial Effect of Sirolimus-Pretreated Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation on Diabetic Retinopathy in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
100 Years since the Discovery of Insulin, from Its Discovery to the Insulins of the Future
Previous Article in Journal
Probiotics as Potential Therapeutic Agents: Safeguarding Skeletal Muscle against Alcohol-Induced Damage through the Gut–Liver–Muscle Axis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyperglycaemia and Its Prognostic Value in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Hospital in Lithuania
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/biomedicines12020381
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Association with Other Risk Factors, Smoking Is the Main Predictor for Lower Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes

by
Tomislav Bulum
1,2,*,
Neva Brkljačić
1,
Angelika Tičinović Ivančić
3,
Maja Čavlović
1,
Ingrid Prkačin
2,4 and
Martina Tomić
1
1
Vuk Vrhovac University Clinic for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Zagreb Country Public Health Institute, 10430 Samobor, Croatia
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(2), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020381
Submission received: 8 January 2024 / Revised: 1 February 2024 / Accepted: 5 February 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Insulin—100 Years since Its Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) significantly increases the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD), and diabetes is the leading cause of nontraumatic amputations. This study investigated the risk factors for transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) in T2DM, a noninvasive method to quantify skin oxygenation and the underlying microvascular circulation. The study included 119 T2DM patients (91 male/28 female). TcPO2 measurements were conducted with the Tina TCM4 Series transcutaneous monitor (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Sweden) and skin electrodes. Patients with TcPO2 < 40 mmHg were younger (p = 0.001), had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p = 0.023), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p = 0.013), fasting plasma glucose (fPG) (p = 0.038), total cholesterol (p = 0.006), LDL cholesterol (p = 0.004), and had more frequent smoking habits (p = 0.001) than those with TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg. The main predictors for the TcPO2 value (R2 = 0.211) obtained via stepwise regression analysis were age, smoking, SBP, HbA1c, fPG, and total and LDL cholesterol. Among all the listed predictors, smoking, HbA1c, and LDL cholesterol were found to be the most significant, with negative parameter estimates of −3.051310 (p = 0.0007), −2.032018 (p = 0.0003), and −2.560353 (p = 0.0046). The results of our study suggest that in association with other risk factors, smoking is the main predictor for lower TcPO2 in T2DM.

1. Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic disease with harmful chronic complications that is still the leading cause of blindness in the adult working population, nontraumatic amputations, and chronic kidney disease. Peripheral artery disease (PAD), caused by atherosclerosis and aggravated with several risk factors, affects the lower extremities and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and death [1,2,3,4,5]. Compared to non-diabetic individuals, diabetes is associated with a two- to fourfold higher risk of PAD, while the presence of diabetes worsens outcomes in patients with PAD [6,7,8,9]. The worst diabetes complication is diabetic foot developed because of diabetic neuropathy and/or PAD [10].
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) usually have metabolic syndrome with a set of metabolic disturbances, like obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and arterial stiffness, that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and the risk of PAD [11,12,13,14]. It should be noted that PAD in diabetic patients is different at biological and clinical levels, and the effects of good glycemic control on the regression of microvascular disease are not reflected in macrovascular disease in the short term. There is a bidirectional relationship between T2DM and PAD; one disease may play an underlying role in the pathophysiology of the other and vice versa [15,16,17]. The ankle–brachial pressure index (ABI) is a noninvasive method to detect the presence and severity of PAD widely used in clinical practice [18,19]. However, in patients with diabetes, ABI has limited reliability in the diagnosis of PAD because of medial artery calcification, and the toe–brachial index (TBI) is more often estimated than ABI [20]. These two methods have limitations when examining the microcirculation in patients with PAD. A transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) measurement provides information about the supply and delivery of oxygen to the underlying microvascular circulation by recording the partial pressure of oxygen at the skin surface. It can be considered a metabolic test, while ABI and TBI are hemodynamic tests [21,22].
ABI and TBI, as the most widely used noninvasive methods to detect the presence and severity of PAD in clinical practice, have limitations when examining microcirculation. Since diabetes is strongly associated with both macrovascular and microvascular complications, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for lower TcPO2 in T2DM, a metabolic test that provides information about microvascular circulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Ethics Statement

This study was cross-sectional and conducted at the Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology and the Department of Cardiology. It included 119 patients with T2DM, referred by a diabetologist/neurologist/vascular surgeon due to suspicion of PAD. PAD has been diagnosed using the color Doppler ultrasound of the superficial femoral and other more distal arteries of both legs. A normal spectral arterial waveform was triphasic, while biphasic and monophasic waveforms of one or several arteries were considered PAD [23]. In those with PAD, ABI and TcPO2 measurements were performed. Patients with an ABI ≤ 1.3 were included in the study. The study was approved by the Hospital’s Ethics Committee (protocol number 04/38-299, approval date: 7 August 2019). All T2DM patients, before any study procedures, received oral and written information about the study protocol and finally signed the written informed consent.

2.2. Demographic Data and Clinical Characteristics

Age at the time of the study, gender, and diabetes duration were basic demographic data of patients included in the study. Weight in kilograms (kg) and height in centimeters (cm) were measured to calculate body mass index (BMI) by dividing weight by the square of height in meters (kg/m2). The waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference were measured with a tailor meter on standard places on bare skin to calculate the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). A digital sphygmomanometer was used to measure systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in a sitting position after the period of a 10 min rest and expressed in mmHg. A smoker was defined as a person who had a history of smoking a minimum of 100 cigarettes during life with current smoking on some days or every day.

2.3. Markers of Glycemic Control and Lipid Metabolism

Fasting plasma glucose (fPG), serum lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol), and hemoglobin A1c were measured in the morning after an overnight fast. Postprandial plasma glucose (ppPG) was measured two hours after a meal. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured using an automated turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (HbA1c Gen 3, Cobas Integra 400 Plus, Roche Diagnostic, Basel, Switzerland) and expressed in % according to the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP). This method is traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference system. Standard enzymatic methods were used to determine serum lipids, fPG, and ppPG on an automated analyzer (Beckman Coulter AU680, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA).

2.4. Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure Measurement

The sensor/electrode of the Tina TCM4 series transcutaneous monitor (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Sweden) was put on the skin, where it heated the underlying tissue to create local hyperemia (making the arteries dilate), intensify the blood perfusion, and increase the oxygen pressure. Electrodes were heated up to 45 °C and transmitted a temperature of about 43 °C on the skin, improving oxygenation of the capillary blood. The sensor received an electric current corresponding to the oxygen concentration in the capillary blood. The oxygen diffused according to pressure from the capillary blood via the vascular epidermis to the electrode placed on the skin surface. After application, the sensor required a 10 to 15 min warm period and needed calibration every four to eight hours. A site reading involved an average of 35 min. Sensors were placed over a homogeneous capillary bed without hair, skin defects, ulcers, and prominent veins. Electrodes were not placed over a bone, on previous operation sites, in scar tissue, or in severe edema because they may have given unreliable results. Patients were advised to avoid prior smoking or caffeine use. During the monitoring, patients were in the supine position.

2.5. Ankle–Brachial Index

To calculate the ABI, measurements of the SBP in the brachial, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis arteries were conducted. The ABI represents higher resting SBP at the ankle divided by the higher systolic brachial pressure. A handheld 5 or 10 mHz Doppler instrument (Sonotrax Pro ultrasonic pocket Doppler, Edan, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to note the systolic pressures. A standard blood pressure cuff was placed immediately above the ankle to obtain the most precise pressure measurements. During the ABI measurement, patients were in the supine position. Normal ABI values are between 0.9 and 1.4. Values < 0.9 are indicative of peripheral atherosclerosis, while values over 1.4 are indicative of vascular calcification.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted, and the graphs were created using the statistical package Statistica™ 14.0.1 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). In all analyses, a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. After testing the normality of data distribution with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and non-normally distributed variables as the median with range. All categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Differences between the two groups were for continuous data examined using parametric (t-test) or non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney), depending on the data distribution, and for categorical data testing, the chi-squared test was used. The Spearman rank correlation test was used to evaluate the relationship between the studied variables. Differences in TcPO2 between the groups according to the smoking habit (no, yes) and HbA1c value (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and their interactions were tested using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Stepwise regression was used to detect the main predictors of TcPO2.

3. Results

This study included 119 T2DM patients (91 male/28 female) with a mean age of 68.5 ± 7.8 years and a mean diabetes duration of 19.7 ± 9 years. All included patients had PAD. According to the Fontaine classification [23], 34 were asymptomatic (stage I), 43 had intermittent claudication after more than 200 m of pain-free walking (stage IIa), 22 had intermittent claudication after less than 200 m of walking (stage IIb), 1 had stage III (ischemic rest pain), and 19 had stage IV (18 neuropathic ischemic ulcers and 1 gangrene). Asymptomatic patients were declared those who did not have typical pain symptoms in the leg muscles provoked by the effort that passes at rest but had a pathological color Doppler ultrasound finding regardless of the finding of ABI. ABI’s median (min–max) in those patients was 0.81 (0.34–1.25). Furthermore, all our included patients had some stage of diabetic neuropathy, i.e., 12 had stage 1 (intermittent numbness and pain), 99 had stage 2 (persistent numbness and pain), and 8 had stage 3 (debilitating pain). Their mean/median values of TcPO2, basic characteristics, all analyzed risk factors, and ABI are shown in Table 1.
Regarding the TcPO2 value, patients were split into two groups: group 1 (TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg; n = 66) and group 2 (TcPO2 < 40 mmHg; n = 53) (Table 2). The two TcPO2 groups did not significantly differ in gender, diabetes duration, anthropometric parameters, BMI, WC and WHR, DBP, ppPG, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (p > 0.05). However, patients with TcPO2 < 40 mmHg were younger (p = 0.001) and had more frequent smoking habits (p = 0.001) than those with TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg. Furthermore, those with lower TcPO2 had significantly higher SBP (p = 0.023), HbA1c (p = 0.013), fPG (p = 0.038), total cholesterol (p = 0.006), and LDL cholesterol (p = 0.004), while they had a significantly lower ABI (p < 0.001) than those with higher TcPO2.
The correlation between TcPO2 and smoking and their relation to other risk factors and ABI are shown in Table 3. A significant negative correlation was found between the TcPO2 value and smoking (R = −0.242166, p = 0.000167) (Figure 1A). TcPO2 correlated significantly positively with age (R = 0.217315, p = 0.000757) while negatively with SBP (R = −0.200125, p = 0.001962) (Figure 1B), HbA1c (R = −0.218749, p = 0.000696) (Figure 1C), fPG (R = −0.153979, p = 0.017687), total cholesterol (R = −0.223532, p = 0.000526) (Figure 1D), and LDL cholesterol (R = −0.220646, p = 0.000624) (Figure 1E). In contrast, smoking related significantly negatively to age (R = −0.320846, p = 0.000000) and gender (m/f; R = −0.233076, p = 0.000287) but significantly positively to HbA1c (R = 0.294675, p = 0.000004) and ppPG (R = 0.137999, p = 0.033343) (Table 3). ABI was associated significantly positively with TcPO2 (R = 0.286434, p = 0.000039), while no significant correlation was observed between ABI and smoking (Table 3).
Figure 2 presents the correlation of ABI and TcPO2 within different stages of the Fontaine scale. The most significant association was observed in stages 1 (R = 0.501668, p = 0.000151) (Figure 2A) and 2 (R = 0.219206, p = 0.018070) (Figure 2B); in stage 3 (Figure 2C), there was a small number of patients to analyze, while in stage 4 (R = −0.038659, p = 0.839275) (Figure 2D), no significant relation between ABI and TcPO2 was observed.
With a special emphasis on the two essential risk factors, smoking and HbA1c, Table 4 presents the differences in TcPO2 of T2DM divided into two groups according to their smoking habit (no, yes) and the level of HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) tested via ANOVA with two main factors and their interaction. The statistically significant differences in TcPO2 were found according to the smoking habit (p = 0.016) and the level of HbA1c (p = 0.002), though the difference in TcPO2 observed according to the interaction between the groups of smoking and HbA1c was not significant (p = 0.419). The differences in TcPO2 found via ANOVA with two main factors and their interaction are graphically shown in Figure 3.
The main predictors for the TcPO2 value (R2 = 0.211) obtained via stepwise regression analysis were age, smoking, SBP, HbA1c, fPG, and total and LDL cholesterol (Table 5). Among all the listed predictors, smoking, HbA1c, and LDL cholesterol were found to be the most significant, with negative parameter estimates of −3.051310 (p = 0.0007), −2.032018 (p = 0.0003), and −2.560353 (p = 0.0046) influencing the TcPO2 value relative to a one-unit change of each and representing the negatively significant impact of the correlation between smoking and well-known risk factors on the reduction in TcPO2 value.

4. Discussion

The results of our study suggest that the main predictors for the lower TcPO2 value in T2DM obtained via stepwise regression analysis are age, smoking, SBP, HbA1c, fPG, total and LDL cholesterol. Among all the listed predictors, smoking, HbA1c, and LDL cholesterol were found to be the most significant. In contrast, no significant correlation was observed between ABI and smoking. TcPO2 is a metabolic test that measures oxygen pressure at the skin surface, while ABI and TBI, the preferred noninvasive indicators of PAD, have limitations when examining microcirculation in patients with PAD [21,22,23,24,25]. Diabetes mellitus facilitates the progression of medial artery calcification, which increases the values of systolic pressure at the ankle, and thus, T2DM patients diagnosed with PAD via a Doppler ultrasound might have a falsely normal ABI [24]. TcPO2 measurement should be conducted to assess the ischemia grade in those with arterial calcification where ABI and TBI are unreliable, in those without clinical symptoms like claudication and rest pain, and in those with diabetic foot complications [26,27,28]. This is following our results where no significant relation between ABI and TcPO2 was observed in stage 4 of the Fontaine classification (in our case, 18 patients with neuropathic ischemic ulcers and 1 with gangrene).
The mean age of T2DM patients in our study was 68.5 ± 7.8 years. It is well known that the prevalence of PAD increases with higher age. The prevalence of PAD in those over 50 years is up to 29% [29]. However, most elderly patients with PAD are asymptomatic because they walk slowly and cannot induce symptoms of PAD, such as rest pain and claudication [30,31]. Considering this, in older patients with T2DM and suspected PAD, TcPO2 might be a better diagnostic option in the assessment of PAD. In our study, older age was associated with better TCO2, which can be explained by the fact that older patients smoked less often and therefore had better TcPO2 results. The median blood pressure in our cohort was 140/80 mmHg, and SBP was slightly increased according to the latest diabetes guidelines [32]. A study that included over 4 million people between 30 and 90 years suggests that a 20 mmHg higher than the recommended SBP is associated with a 63% higher risk of PAD independent of sex or smoking status [33]. In addition, isolated systolic hypertension is the most prevalent form of hypertension in the population with PAD [34]. On the contrary, only those with lower DBP (<70 mm Hg) had a higher risk of PAD events in the lower extremities [35]. Intensive blood pressure control is effective and safe in patients with PAD [36]. Hypertension induces thickness of the smooth muscle cell layer of the media, fibrosis, remodeling of large arteries, and arterial stiffness, contributing to PAD [37,38,39].
In our study, HbA1c and fPG were significant predictors for the TcPO2 value. Advanced glycation end-products (AGE), promoted by hyperglycemia, accumulate in patients and may accelerate the progression of microvascular complications in diabetes [40]. In contrast, the relationship between hyperglycemia and the atherosclerosis of large arteries appears weaker [41]. AGE activates the expression of adhesion molecules on the surface and promotes the adhesion and entrance of monocytes/macrophages into the subendothelial space. AGE also modifies extracellular matrix molecules involved in developing atherosclerotic lesions [42]. Hyperglycemia also promotes proinflammatory responses via the activation of protein kinase C-beta and aldose reductase [43]. Hyperglycemia induces oxidative stress with superoxide overproduction in endothelial cells that activates several significant pathways involved in the pathogenesis of micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes [44]. Finally, increased glucose uptake by vascular cells activates protein kinase C, an essential protein kinase mediating the cellular signaling pathway, and has several pro-atherogenic effects [45,46]. In ischemic conditions, hyperglycemia per se increases the susceptibility to limb necrosis [47].
Diabetic dyslipidemia is a known risk factor for PAD, and in T2DM nitrated lipoproteins, modified lipoproteins produced by the nitration of the tyrosyl residues of apolipoproteins by myeloperoxidase are also linked with cardiovascular disease [12]. The relationship between the level of LDL cholesterol, notably small dense LDL cholesterol, and the risk of atherosclerosis in T2DM is one of the most studied connections. In our study, total and LDL cholesterol were significant predictors for the TcPO2 value. In T2DM and insulin resistance, there is a predominance of small dense subclasses of LDL cholesterol that undergo several modifications, making them more atherogenic [48]. Small dense LDL cholesterol is associated with poor outcomes after vascular angioplasty in patients with PAD. Since our study included overweight T2DM, we can assume there was a predominance of small dense LDL particles in our patients [49,50]. In patients with type 1 diabetes with similar total and LDL cholesterol levels, as in our study, higher serum lipid levels were associated with lower TcPO2 [51].
The results of our study indicate that, in association with other risk factors, smoking is the main predictor for lower TcPO2 in T2DM. Smoking influences the distribution and composition of serum lipids, increases the total cholesterol content, promotes longer circulation of LDL in plasma and uptake in vessels, and accelerates the formation of plaques [52,53,54]. Cigarette smoke may induce the dysfunction of endothelial cells via decreased endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and smooth muscle cells via several mechanisms [55,56]. Cigarette smoke directly damages cellular and sub-cellular structures via reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and the resulting oxidative stress [57]. Smoking causes vascular wall contraction by activating Rho kinase, promoting monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and entering monocytes and macrophages into endothelium [58,59]. Nicotine from cigarette smoke causes migration, proliferation, apoptosis, phenotypic changes, and the contraction of smooth muscle cells in the arterial wall [60]. Smoking has a direct effect on the TcPO2 value because smoking increases carboxyhemoglobin and reduces oxyhemoglobin, therefore decreasing the TcPO2 value as well. However, a study that included 129 patients with PAD found that only the presence of diabetes adversely affected TcPO2 and clinical disease severity but not smoking [61]. Croatia has one of the highest smoking rates in Europe despite various anti-smoking campaigns. According to 2020 study data, the prevalence of smoking in Croatia was 36%, the third-highest tobacco prevalence in Europe [62].
Some limitations of the present study should be addressed. First, the cross-sectional design of our study limited the ability to infer a causal relation between TcPO2 and risk for the progression of PAD. Second, our study was a single hospital-based study; therefore, selection bias is likely. Third, this cohort had little racial/ethnic diversity, and our data would be primarily relevant to a white European population. Fourth, in patients with diabetes, TBI is more often estimated than ABI. Finally, a major limitation of the study is that smoking is recorded as a dichotomous variable, whereas it should be treated as a continuous one, given its effects vary significantly with the dosage consumed.

5. Conclusions

Our results suggest that, in association with other risk factors, smoking is the main predictor for lower TcPO2 in T2DM. No significant correlation was observed between ABI and smoking, and no significant relation between ABI and TcPO2 was observed in patients in the worst stage of the Fontaine classification, indicating that the TcPO2 measurement might be the preferable option to assess the ischemia grade in those with diabetic foot complications. In our everyday clinical practice, besides the optimal control of systemic risk factors, we need to be much more aware of the harmful effects of smoking, and patients with T2DM and PAD should be strongly advised to stop smoking.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.B., M.T. and N.B.; data curation, M.T.; formal analysis, T.B. and M.T.; methodology, T.B., M.T. and N.B., project administration, T.B. and M.T.; resources, T.B.; supervision, N.B. and T.B.; writing—original draft, T.B. and M.T.; writing—review and editing, T.B., N.B., M.T., A.T.I., I.P. and M.Č. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Hospital’s Ethics Committee (Merkur University Hospital, protocol number 04/38-299, approval date: 7 August 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on a specific request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aronson, D.; Rayfield, E.J. How hyperglycemia promotes atherosclerosis: Molecular mechanisms. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2002, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nishikawa, T.; Edelstein, D.; Du, X.L.; Yamagishi, S.; Matsumura, T.; Kaneda, Y.; Yorek, M.A.; Beebe, D.; Oates, P.J.; Hammes, H.P.; et al. Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycemic damage. Nature 2000, 404, 787–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. American Diabetes Association. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 3333–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Creager, M.A.; White, C.J.; Hiatt, W.R.; Criqui, M.H.; Josephs, S.C.; Alberts, M.J.; Pearce, W.H.; Gray, B.H.; Rocha-Singh, K.J. Atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease symposium II: Executive summary. Circulation 2008, 118, 2811–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marso, S.P.; Hiatt, W.R. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mukherjee, D. Peripheral and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease in diabetes mellitus. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 23, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fadini, G.P.; Spinetti, G.; Santopaolo, M.; Madeddu, P. Impaired regeneration contributes to poor outcomes in diabetic peripheral artery disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fitridge, R.; Pena, G.; Mills, J.L. The patient presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Does diabetes influence presentation, limb outcomes and survival? Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2020, 36 (Suppl. S1), e3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bandyk, D.F. The diabetic foot: Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 31, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Regufe, V.; Pinto, C.; Perez, P. Metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetic patients: A review of current evidence. Porto Biomed. J. 2020, 6, e101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jakubiak, G.K.; Cie’slar, G.; Stanek, A. Nitrotyrosine, Nitrated Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: What Do We Know and What Remains to Be Explained? Antioxidants 2022, 11, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stanek, A.; Grygiel-Górniak, B.; Brożyna-Tkaczyk, K.; Myśliński, W.; Cholewka, A.; Zolghadri, S. The Influence of Dietary Interventions on Arterial Stiffness in Overweight and Obese Subjects. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bello-Chavolla, O.Y.; Antonio-Villa, N.E.; Vargas-Vázquez, A.; Martagón, A.J.; Mehta, R.; Arellano-Campos, O.; Gómez-Velasco, D.V.; Almeda-Valdés, P.; Cruz-Bautista, I.; Melgarejo-Hernandez, M.A.; et al. Prediction of incident hypertension and arterial stiffness using the non–insulin-based metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) index. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2019, 21, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Achim, A.; Stanek, A.; Homorodean, C.; Spinu, M.; Onea, H.L.; Lazăr, L.; Marc, M.; Ruzsa, Z.; Olinic, D.M. Approaches to Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetes: Are There Any Differences? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilcox, T.; Newman, J.D.; Maldonado, T.S.; Rockman, C.; Berger, J.S. Peripheral vascular disease risk in diabetic individuals without coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis 2018, 275, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jakubiak, G.K.; Pawlas, N.; Cieślar, G.; Stanek, A. Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia and Its Association with the Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Diabetes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aboyans, V.; Ricco, J.B.; Bartelink, M.E.L.; Björck, M.; Brodmann, M.; Cohnert, T.; Collet, J.P.; Czerny, M.; De Carlo, M.; Debus, S.; et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: The European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 763–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Casey, S.; Lanting, S.; Oldmeadow, C.; Chuter, V. The reliability of the ankle brachial index: A systematic review. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2019, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chang, C.-W.; Sung, Y.-W.; Huang, Y.-T.; Chung, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-Y. Better Detection of Peripheral Arterial Disease with Toe-Brachial Index Compared to Ankle-Brachial Index among Taiwanese Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Leenstra, B.; Wijnand, J.; Verhoeven, B.; Koning, O.; Teraa, M.; Verhaar, M.C.; de Borst, G.J. Applicability of Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension Measurement in the Assessment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Angiology 2020, 71, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leenstra, B.; de Kleijn, R.; Kuppens, G.; Verhoeven, B.A.N.; Hinnen, J.W.; de Borst, G.J. Photo-Optical Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension Measurement Is of Added Value to Predict Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: An Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nasra, K.; Osher, M. Sonography Vascular Peripheral Arterial Assessment, Protocols, and Interpretation. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570577/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  24. Kim, T.I.; Guzman, R.J. Medial artery calcification in peripheral artery disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1093355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fontaine, R.; Kim, M.; Kieny, R. Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders. Helv. Chir. Acta 1954, 21, 499–533. (In German) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. López-Moral, M.; García-Madrid, M.; Molines-Barroso, R.J.; García-Álvarez, Y.; Tardáguila-García, A.; Lázaro-Martínez, J.L. Analyses of transcutaneous oxygen pressure values stratified for foot angiosomes to predict diabetic foot ulcer healing. J. Tissue Viability 2023, 32, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ren, B.; Li, B.; Pan, T.; Zhao, E.; Ju, S.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Huang, L.; et al. Risk factors for at-risk foot and peripheral artery disease among the population with diabetes: A multicommunity-based cross-sectional study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2023, 203, 110869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Catella, J.; Long, A.; Mazzolai, L. What Is Currently the Role of TcPO2 in the Choice of the Amputation Level of Lower Limbs? A Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Thiruvoipati, T.; Kielhorn, C.E.; Armstrong, E.J. Peripheral artery disease in patients with diabetes: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and outcomes. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Aronow, W.S. Peripheral arterial disease in the elderly. Clin. Interv. Aging 2007, 2, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aronow, W.S.; Ahn, C.; Gutstein, H. Prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular disease in 1160 older men and 2464 older women in a long-term health care facility. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002, 57, M45–M46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: Standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024, 47 (Suppl. S1), S179–S218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Emdin, C.A.; Anderson, S.G.; Callender, T.; Conrad, N.; Salimi-Khorshidi, G.; Mohseni, H.; Woodward, M.; Rahimi, K. Usual blood pressure, peripheral arterial disease, and vascular risk: Cohort study of 4.2 million adults. BMJ 2015, 351, h4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Safar, M.E.; Priollet, P.; Luizy, F.; Mourad, J.-J.; Cacoub, P.; Levesque, H.; Benelbaz, J.; Michon, P.; Herrmann, M.-A.; Blacher, J. Peripheral arterial disease and isolated systolic hypertension: The ATTEST study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2009, 23, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Itoga, N.K.; Tawfik, D.S.; Lee, C.K.; Maruyama, S.; Leeper, N.J.; Chang, T.I. Association of Blood Pressure Measurements with Peripheral Artery Disease Events. Circulation 2018, 138, 1805–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Frary, J.M.C.; Pareek, M.; Byrne, C.; Vaduganathan, M.; Biering-Sørensen, T.; Rujic, D.; Kragholm, K.H.; Olesen, T.B.; Olsen, M.H.; Bhatt, D.L. Intensive blood pressure control appears to be effective and safe in patients with peripheral artery disease: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2021, 7, e38–e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shimizu, Y. Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Partly Indicates the Prevention of Hypertension among Older Individuals in the General Population. Life 2023, 13, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rubio-Guerra, A.F.; Garro-Almendaro, A.K.; Lozano-Nuevo, J.L.; Arana-Pazos, K.C.; Duran-Salgado, M.B.; Morales-López, H. Prehypertension is associated with peripheral arterial disease and low ankle-brachial index. Indian Heart J. 2018, 70, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Omboni, S.; Posokhov, I.N.; Rogoza, A.N. Relationships between 24-h blood pressure variability and 24-h central arterial pressure, pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in hypertensive patients. Hypertens. Res. 2017, 40, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Poznyak, A.; Grechko, A.V.; Poggio, P.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Alfieri, V.; Orekhov, A.N. The Diabetes Mellitus–Atherosclerosis Connection: The Role of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bornfeldt, K.E. Does Elevated Glucose Promote Atherosclerosis? Pros and Cons. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Katakami, N. Mechanism of Development of Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018, 25, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tabit, C.E.; Shenouda, S.M.; Holbrook, M.; Fetterman, J.L.; Kiani, S.; Frame, A.A.; Kluge, M.A.; Held, A.; Dohadwala, M.M.; Gokce, N.; et al. Protein kinase C-β contributes to impaired endothelial insulin signaling in humans with diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2013, 127, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Newton, A.C. Regulation of the ABC kinases by phosphorylation: Protein kinase C as a paradigm. Biochem. J. 2008, 88, 1341–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zeadin, M.G.; Petlura, C.I.; Werstuck, G.H. Molecular mechanisms linking diabetes to the accelerated development of atherosclerosis. Can. J. Diabetes 2013, 37, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lévigne, D.; Tobalem, M.; Modarressi, A.; Pittet-Cuénod, B. Hyperglycemia Increases Susceptibility to Ischemic Necrosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 490964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ivanova, E.A.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Melnichenko, A.A.; Grechko, A.V.; Orekhov, A.N. Small dense low-density lipoprotein as biomarker for atherosclerotic diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1273042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klop, B.; Elte, J.W.F.; Cabezas, M.C. Dyslipidemia in obesity: Mechanisms and potential targets. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1218–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jacomella, V.; Gerber, P.A.; Mosimann, K.; Husmann, M.; Thalhammer, C.; Wilkinson, I.; Berneis, K.; Amann-Vesti, B.R. Small Dense Low Density Lipoprotein Particles Are Associated with Poor Outcome after Angioplasty in Peripheral Artery Disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Neubauer-Geryk, J.; Wielicka, M.; Kozera, G.M.; Brandt-Varma, A.; Wołoszyn-Durkiewicz, A.; Myśliwiec, M.; Bieniaszewski, L. Skin oxygenation impairment is associated with increased total cholesterol level in children with short-lasting type 1 diabetes mellitus. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. 2021, 38, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, W.; Zhao, T.; Geng, K.; Yuan, G.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y. Smoking and the Pathophysiology of Peripheral Artery Disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 704106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lietz, M.; Berges, A.; Lebrun, S.; Meurrens, K.; Steffen, Y.; Stolle, K.; Schueller, J.; Boue, S.; Vuillaume, G.; Vanscheeuwijck, P.; et al. Cigarette-smoke-induced atherogenic lipid profiles in plasma and vascular tissue of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice are attenuated by smoking cessation. Atherosclerosis 2013, 229, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, B.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Niu, S.; Ni, L.; Di, X.; Han, Q.; Liu, C. Cigarette smoke exposure impairs lipid metabolism by decreasing low-density lipoprotein receptor expression in hepatocytes. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Siasos, G.; Tsigkou, V.; Kokkou, E.; Oikonomou, E.; Vavuranakis, M.; Vlachopoulos, C.; Verveniotis, A.; Limperi, M.; Genimata, V.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; et al. Smoking and atherosclerosis: Mechanisms of disease and new therapeutic approaches. Curr. Med. Chem. 2014, 21, 3936–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Donato, A.J.; Morgan, R.G.; Walker, A.E.; Lesniewski, L.A. Cellular and molecular biology of aging endothelial cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015, 89, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Caliri, A.W.; Tommasi, S.; Besaratinia, A. Relationships among smoking, oxidative stress, inflammation, macromolecular damage, and cancer. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2021, 787, 108365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Higashi, Y. Smoking cessation and vascular endothelial function. Hypertens. Res. 2023, 46, 2670–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, C.; Petriello, M.C.; Zhu, B.; Hennig, B. PCB 126 induces monocyte/macrophage polarization and inflammation through AhR and NF-κB pathways. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2019, 367, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Duong-Quy, S.; Dao, P.; Hua-Huy, T.; Guilluy, C.; Pacaud, P.; Dinh-Xuan, A.T. Increased Rho-kinase expression and activity and pulmonary endothelial dysfunction in smokers with normal lung function. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 37, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rooke, T.W.; Osmundson, P.J. The influence of age, sex, smoking, and diabetes on lower limb transcutaneous oxygen tension in patients with arterial occlusive disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 1990, 150, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 429: Attitudes of Europeans towards Tobacco and Electronic Cigarettes. 2020. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/tobacco/overview_en#documents (accessed on 17 January 2023).
Biomedicines 12 00381 g001
Figure 1. Correlations between transcutaneous oxygen pressure and smoking (A), systolic blood pressure (B), hemoglobin A1c (C), total cholesterol (D), and LDL cholesterol (E) in type 2 diabetic patients included in the study.
Figure 1. Correlations between transcutaneous oxygen pressure and smoking (A), systolic blood pressure (B), hemoglobin A1c (C), total cholesterol (D), and LDL cholesterol (E) in type 2 diabetic patients included in the study.
Biomedicines 12 00381 g001
Biomedicines 12 00381 g002
Figure 2. Correlations between the ankle–brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen pressure within different stages of the Fontaine scale: stage 1 (A), stage 2 (B), stage 3 (C), and stage 4 (D).
Figure 2. Correlations between the ankle–brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen pressure within different stages of the Fontaine scale: stage 1 (A), stage 2 (B), stage 3 (C), and stage 4 (D).
Biomedicines 12 00381 g002
Biomedicines 12 00381 g003
Figure 3. Differences in transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) according to the smoking habit and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value.
Figure 3. Differences in transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) according to the smoking habit and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value.
Biomedicines 12 00381 g003
Table 1. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure, basic characteristics, risk factors, and ankle–brachial index of all type 2 diabetic patients (n = 119) included in the study.
Table 1. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure, basic characteristics, risk factors, and ankle–brachial index of all type 2 diabetic patients (n = 119) included in the study.
All Patients Included in the Study (n = 119)
TcPO2 (mmHg)40.85 ± 13.97
Smoking (no/yes) (%)50.4/49.6
BMI (kg/m2)29.39 ± 4.88
WC (cm)106.2 ± 12.5
WHR0.99 ± 0.07
SBP (mmHg)140 (90–235)
DBP (mmHg)80 (41–115)
HbA1c (%)7.90 ± 1.62
fPG (mmol/L)8.16 ± 2.72
ppPG (mmol/L)10.78 ± 3.54
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.5 (2.5–9.2)
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)1.2 (0.4–2.3)
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)2.4 (0.3–4.9)
Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.6 (0.6–9.5)
ABI0.8 (0.3–1.3)
Legend: values are means ± SD, percentages, or median (min–max). BMI indicates body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; fPG, fasting plasma glucose; ppPG, postprandial plasma glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ABI, ankle–brachial index.
Table 2. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure, risk factors, and ankle–brachial index of type 2 diabetic patients (n = 119) divided into two groups according to the transcutaneous oxygen pressure.
Table 2. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure, risk factors, and ankle–brachial index of type 2 diabetic patients (n = 119) divided into two groups according to the transcutaneous oxygen pressure.
TcPO2 ≥ 40
(n = 66)		TcPO2 < 40
(n = 53)		ta χb Zcp
TcPO2 (mmHg)50.34 ± 8.8529.12 ± 9.4917.767 a<0.001
Age (years)70.00 ± 7.4566.75 ± 7.893.248 a0.001
Smoking (no/yes) (%)59.5/40.538.7/61.310.201 b0.001
SBP (mmHg)140 (90–230)148 (100–235)−2.267 c0.023
HbA1c (%)7.67 ± 1.588.20 ± 1.64−2.517 a0.013
fPG (mmol/L)7.85 ± 2.148.58 ± 3.25−2.082 a0.038
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.3 (2.5–9.1)4.8 (2.9–9.2)−2.722 c0.006
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)2.2 (0.3–4.7)2.6 (1.2–4.9)−2.848 c0.004
ABI0.8 (0.5–1.2)0.7 (0.3–1.3)3.539 c<0.001
Legend: values are means ± SD, percentages, or medians (min–max). ta represents t-test, χb represents chi-square test, Zc represents Mann–Whitney test, p represents comparison between patients with different level of TcPO2. SBP indicates systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ABI, ankle–brachial index.
Table 3. Correlations between transcutaneous oxygen pressure, smoking, the other risk factors, and ankle–brachial index in type 2 diabetic patients included in the study.
Table 3. Correlations between transcutaneous oxygen pressure, smoking, the other risk factors, and ankle–brachial index in type 2 diabetic patients included in the study.
TcPO2Smoking
Smoking−0.242 **1.000
Age0.217 **−0.321 **
Gender (m/f)−0.067−0.233 **
SBP−0.200 *0.011
HbA1c−0.219 **0.295 **
fPG−0.154 *0.051
ppPG−0.0320.138 *
Total cholesterol−0.224 **0.096
LDL cholesterol−0.129 *0.059
ABI0.286 **−0.006
Legend: values are Spearman R-values. ** represents p < 0.001, * p < 0.05. SBP indicates systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; fPG, fasting plasma glucose; ppPG, postprandial plasma glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ABI, ankle–brachial index.
Table 4. Results of two-way ANOVA for the differences between transcutaneous oxygen pressure according to the smoking habit, hemoglobin A1c, and their interaction.
Table 4. Results of two-way ANOVA for the differences between transcutaneous oxygen pressure according to the smoking habit, hemoglobin A1c, and their interaction.
TcPO2
dfFp
Smoking15.9320.016
HbA1c gr.19.3940.002
Smoking and HbA1c gr.10.6560.419
Legend: TcPO2 indicates transcutaneous oxygen pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
Table 5. Results of stepwise regression analysis for the transcutaneous oxygen pressure as a dependent variable.
Table 5. Results of stepwise regression analysis for the transcutaneous oxygen pressure as a dependent variable.
VariableEstimateStandard ErrorFpAdjusted R2R2
Age0.35513.7169.650.00210.03530.211
Smoking−3.05113.65611.830.00070.0439
SBP−0.14513.64512.210.00060.0454
HbA1c−2.03213.59813.930.00030.0519
fPG−1.10913.66511.460.00080.0424
Total cholesterol−1.95913.7717.710.00590.0277
LDL cholesterol−2.56013.7578.190.00460.0296
Legend: TcPO2 indicates transcutaneous oxygen pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; fPG, fasting plasma glucose; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bulum, T.; Brkljačić, N.; Tičinović Ivančić, A.; Čavlović, M.; Prkačin, I.; Tomić, M. In Association with Other Risk Factors, Smoking Is the Main Predictor for Lower Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020381

AMA Style

Bulum T, Brkljačić N, Tičinović Ivančić A, Čavlović M, Prkačin I, Tomić M. In Association with Other Risk Factors, Smoking Is the Main Predictor for Lower Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(2):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bulum, Tomislav, Neva Brkljačić, Angelika Tičinović Ivančić, Maja Čavlović, Ingrid Prkačin, and Martina Tomić. 2024. "In Association with Other Risk Factors, Smoking Is the Main Predictor for Lower Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes" Biomedicines 12, no. 2: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020381

APA Style

Bulum, T., Brkljačić, N., Tičinović Ivančić, A., Čavlović, M., Prkačin, I., & Tomić, M. (2024). In Association with Other Risk Factors, Smoking Is the Main Predictor for Lower Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes. Biomedicines, 12(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop