Next Article in Journal
MSR405: Inhibiting Neuroinflammation after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Targeted Delivery of Abaloparatide to Spinal Fusion Site Accelerates Fusion Process in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physical Health and Transition to Psychosis in People at Clinical High Risk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders

by
Masaru Tanaka
1,*,† and
László Vécsei
1,2,†
1
HUN-REN-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Hungarian Research Network, University of Szeged (HUN-REN-SZTE), Danube Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Tisza Lajos krt. 113, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
2
Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(3), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030613
Submission received: 4 March 2024 / Accepted: 6 March 2024 / Published: 8 March 2024

1. Introduction

Neuroscience, neurology, and psychiatry are rapidly evolving fields that aim to understand the complex mechanisms underlying brain function and dysfunction, as well as to develop effective interventions for various neurological and psychiatric disorders [1,2,3]. Recent advances in molecular biology, genetics, epigenetics, pharmacology, and neuroimaging have provided new insights into the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of these disorders [4,5,6,7,8]. However, there are still many challenges and gaps in translating basic research findings into clinical applications and improving the quality of life of patients and their families [9,10,11]. One pivotal area of interest within these disciplines is neuroplasticity, the brain’s remarkable ability to reorganize and adapt throughout life [12,13,14,15,16]. Neuroplasticity encompasses various mechanisms, including synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and alterations in neuronal connectivity, which underpin crucial processes such as learning, memory, and recovery from injury or disease [17,18,19,20]. In tandem with understanding neuroplasticity, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have emerged as promising therapeutic modalities [21,22,23]. These techniques can modulate neuroplasticity by inducing changes in cortical excitability and connectivity, offering potential avenues for ameliorating symptoms associated with conditions such as depression, schizophrenia (SCZ), and chronic pain [24,25,26]. Research indicates that NIBS holds promise for enhancing cognitive function, alleviating mood disturbances, and reducing pain perception by targeting specific brain regions implicated in these processes [27,28,29]. Moreover, combining NIBS with cognitive training, psychotherapy, or pharmacotherapy may enhance treatment outcomes synergistically [30,31,32,33].
To address these challenges and gaps, this Special Issue invited original research articles and reviews focusing on genetic, epigenetic, environmental, and pharmacological models for neuroscience, neurologic diseases, and psychiatric disorders. We aimed to showcase the latest developments and innovations in bench-to-bedside translational research, as well as highlight the opportunities and limitations of various models and methods [34,35,36]. We also aimed to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and communication among researchers and clinicians working in different fields and domains. The Special Issue received 12 high-quality submissions from authors across the world, covering a wide range of topics and disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease, SCZ, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, autism, addiction, and pain. The articles presented novel findings and perspectives on the molecular and cellular mechanisms, genetic and epigenetic factors, environmental influences, pharmacological interventions, and biomarkers of these disorders, complementing previous research [37,38,39]. The articles also discussed the challenges and future directions of translational research in neuroscience, neurology, and psychiatry. Below, we briefly summarize the main contributions and implications of each article.

2. Special Issue Articles

2.1. Neurostimulation and Neuroimaging Techniques for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders

Neuroimaging techniques and brain stimulation such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (PET/MRI), electroencephalography, and TMS are powerful tools for exploring the brain mechanisms underlying language processing and recovery in various neurological and psychiatric disorders [40,41,42,43,44]. These techniques can measure hemodynamic, metabolic, and electrophysiological changes in the brain regions involved in language function, as well as modulate their activity and connectivity [42,45,46]. By applying these techniques to different populations, such as patients with fMRI-related anxiety, epilepsy, or aphasia, researchers can gain insights into the factors that affect language performance and plasticity and develop novel interventions to enhance language rehabilitation [47,48,49].
Rassler et al. investigate how healthy subjects cope with anxiety during fMRI scans by analyzing their heart rate, respiration, and brain activity [50]. The authors found that different subjects use different strategies, such as activating a neural pacemaker or entraining brain oscillations with respiration, to modulate their anxiety level. The article also discusses the implications of these findings for understanding the neural mechanisms of anxiety and its treatment. Papageorgiou et al. reviewed the current state and challenges of aphasia rehabilitation, a field that aims to restore language functions after stroke [51]. This article discusses how translational neuroscience, which bridges basic science and clinical practice, can provide insights into the neural mechanisms of neuroplasticity and language recovery. Additionally, it suggests that domain-general cognitive processes support language, which implies that non-linguistic factors may affect aphasia treatment outcomes. The article concludes that a multidisciplinary and translational approach is needed to advance the knowledge and practice of aphasia rehabilitation.
Borbély et al. evaluated the concordance between PET/MRI and electroclinical data in the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy [52]. Their study found that PET/MRI had a high concordance rate with electroclinical data, suggesting that PET/MRI could be a valuable tool in the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. The study highlights the potential of PET/MRI in improving the accuracy of presurgical evaluation and reducing the risk of complications associated with epilepsy surgery. The findings of this study could have significant implications for the management of patients with epilepsy, particularly those who are candidates for surgery. de Albuquerque et al. investigated the effect of a single application of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) on motor skill acquisition in PD [53]. The pilot study found that a single application of c-tDCS failed to enhance motor skill acquisition in the condition. The study highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal parameters and duration of c-tDCS to improve motor skill acquisition in the disease. The findings of this study could have significant implications for the development of new therapeutic strategies for PD.

2.2. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Therapies for Neurologic Diseases and Stroke

Neurological disorders, such as stroke, migraine, and epilepsy, are characterized by impairments in brain function and structure, which can have an impact on patients’ quality of life and survival [54,55,56,57]. Finding effective therapeutic interventions to prevent or treat these disorders presents a significant challenge for biomedical research. In this regard, three articles published in this Special Issue investigate the effects of various pharmacological or hormonal treatments on brain function and structure in animal models or human patients suffering from various neurological disorders [58,59,60]. They use a variety of methods to assess the outcomes of the interventions, including biochemical assays, behavioral tests, and neuroimaging techniques [61,62,63]. Their findings shed new light on the mechanisms and potential benefits of these interventions for the prevention and treatment of neurological disorders.
Inoue et al. investigated the potential of sedation therapy in intensive care units (ICUs) to combat oxidative stress by harnessing the power of antioxidants [58]. The research aimed to determine whether common sedatives, such as propofol, thiopental, and dexmedetomidine, have direct free radical scavenging activity. The study identified the direct radical-scavenging activity of various sedatives used in clinical settings and reported a representative case of traumatic brain injury wherein thiopental administration demonstrated antioxidant effects. The findings suggest the potential for the redevelopment of sedatives containing thiopental as an antioxidant therapy, highlighting the importance of further research in this area. The study provides valuable insights into the potential dual benefits of sedatives in ICUs, serving as both sedative agents and antioxidants, which could have significant implications for the management of critically ill patients requiring sedation in ICUs.
Chen et al. used a rat model to investigate the ability of M4P, a TRPM4-blocking antibody, to protect the cerebral vasculature during delayed stroke reperfusion [59]. The study found that M4P reduced mortality rates and infarct volume, improved vascular integrity, and improved cerebral blood flow and functional recovery after delayed stroke reperfusion. These findings suggest that TRPM4-blocking antibodies have therapeutic potential in reducing vascular injury associated with delayed stroke reperfusion, opening up a promising avenue for the development of stroke therapies. Spekker et al. investigated the effect of estradiol treatment on the behavioral and molecular changes induced by repetitive trigeminal activation in a migraine rat model [60]. These changes were found to be enhanced by estradiol treatment, suggesting that estradiol may have a modulatory effect on the pathophysiology of migraine. The study sheds light on the potential role of estradiol in migraine-related mechanisms, emphasizing its significance in migraine research. These studies provide valuable insights into novel treatment approaches for neurological disorders, emphasizing the need for further research in these areas [64].

2.3. Genetic and Epigenetic Factors in Neurologic Diseases and Stroke

Stroke is a neurological condition that arises when the flow of blood to a specific area of the brain is disrupted, resulting in brain injury and the impairment of multiple functions [65,66,67]. Stroke is a significant contributor to mortality and impairment on a global scale, necessitating urgent biomedical research to identify effective interventions and preventive measures [68,69,70]. In this context, two articles explore the role of human umbilical cord blood cells, which are a rich source of stem cells and growth factors, in the context of stroke [71,72]. Salafutdinov et al. evaluated the biosafety of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells transduced with an adenoviral vector containing human vascular endothelial growth factor cDNA in vitro [71]. The study assessed the transduction efficacy, transgene expression, transcriptome analysis, and secretome profiling of genetically modified cells, yielding valuable insights into their safety and potential applications. The findings add to our understanding of the biosafety aspects of this cellular modification, which is important for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Ikonnikova et al. used a genetic association study and machine learning to investigate platelet reactivity differences in aspirin-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke [72]. The study sought to understand the contribution of genetic features to laboratory aspirin resistance as measured by platelet aggregation, thereby providing insights into the genetic variations that influence platelet reactivity in the context of ischemic stroke and aspirin treatment. The study’s findings add to ongoing efforts to understand the genetic determinants of aspirin resistance, a major concern in ischemic stroke care. These studies offer valuable knowledge about the safety and potential uses of genetically modified cells and the genetic factors that affect platelet reactivity in the context of ischemic stroke and aspirin treatment. They emphasize the need for additional research in these fields.

2.4. Physical and Mental Health Interactions in Psychiatric Disorders

Physical health and mental health are closely intertwined and affect each other in various ways [73,74,75]. For example, physical illnesses can increase the risk of developing mental disorders, and vice versa [76,77,78]. To better understand and intervene in these complex and bidirectional relationships, a translational and multidisciplinary approach is needed that bridges the gap between basic and clinical research and incorporates different perspectives and methods from various disciplines [79,80,81]. In this context, the three articles published in this Special Issue of Biomedicines adopt such an approach and use various methods and data sources, such as epidemiological studies, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines, to provide evidence-based and comprehensive insights into the interactions between physical health and mental health in different populations and contexts [82,83,84]. Their results have important implications for the prevention and treatment of various neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Sobolewska-Nowak et al. investigated the relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease, focusing on common risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, and physical inactivity. The study emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the incorporation of depression screening into the treatment of cardiac conditions, highlighting the bidirectional relationship between these health issues and the need to address mental health in cardiovascular care [82]. The study by Festa et al. highlights the positive impact of physical activity on cognition across all age groups, emphasizing the benefits of exercise on attention, memory, and executive functions. The study emphasizes the importance of better understanding the mechanisms underlying these effects, as well as the development of appropriate intervention programs based on age and comorbidity, in order to maximize the cognitive benefits of physical activity [83].
The study by De Micheli et al. investigated the relationship between physical health and the transition to psychosis in people at clinically high risk [84]. The research highlights the importance of monitoring physical health outcomes in individuals at clinically high risk for psychosis, emphasizing the need for public health strategies to promote physical health in this population. The study underscores the bidirectional relationship between physical and mental health, highlighting the need for integrated care to improve outcomes in individuals at clinically high risk for psychosis. These studies advocate for integrated care and the promotion of healthy behaviors to improve overall health outcomes, recognizing the interconnectedness of physical and mental health.

3. Conclusions

Neurological and psychiatric disorders are among the most prevalent and debilitating conditions that affect millions of people worldwide [85,86,87]. Despite the advances in neuroscience and neurology, the etiology and pathogenesis of these disorders remain largely unknown, and contemporary treatments are often inadequate or associated with adverse effects [88,89,90,91]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new and effective strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat these disorders [92,93,94]. To achieve this goal, it is essential to establish reliable and relevant models that can recapitulate the complex interactions between the genetic, epigenetic, environmental, and pharmacological factors that contribute to the onset and progression of these disorders [95,96,97]. Moreover, it is important to identify novel targets and mechanisms that can modulate the molecular and functional changes that occur in the brain and peripheral tissues of patients with these disorders [98,99,100,101,102].
This Special Issue on Genetic, Epigenetic, Environmental, and Pharmacological Models for Neuroscience, Neurologic Diseases, and Psychiatric Disorders: Advancement in Bench-to-Bedside Translational Research has presented a collection of 12 articles that cover a wide range of topics and methods in the field of neuroscience and neurology. The articles have demonstrated the importance and challenges of developing and validating animal and cellular models that can mimic the complex pathophysiology and phenotypes of human neurological and psychiatric disorders. The articles have also highlighted the potential of novel pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that can modulate the molecular and functional alterations underlying these disorders. The Special Issue has provided valuable insights and perspectives for advancing translational research from basic science to clinical applications. We hope that this Special Issue will stimulate further research and collaboration among researchers and clinicians who share the common goal of improving the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. We also hope that this Special Issue will inspire new ideas and innovations that can bridge the gap between bench and bedside and ultimately benefit patients and society. We thank all the authors and reviewers for their contributions to this Special Issue, and we invite the readers to explore the diverse and exciting topics that are presented in this collection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, M.T. and L.V. visualization, M.T.; supervision, M.T. and L.V.; project administration, M.T.; funding acquisition, M.T. and L.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Office—NKFIH K138125, SZTE SZAOK-KKA No: 2022/5S729, and the HUN-REN Hungarian Research Network.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

c-tDCSCerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.
fMRIFunctional magnetic resonance imaging.
ICUsIntensive care units.
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging.
PDParkinson’s disease.
PETPositron emission tomography.
SCZSchizophrenia.
tDCSTranscranial direct current stimulation.
TMSTranscranial magnetic stimulation.

References

  1. Bassett, D.S.; Sporns, O. Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huys, Q.J.; Maia, T.V.; Frank, M.J. Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Insel, T.R.; Quirion, R. Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline. JAMA 2005, 294, 2221–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sullivan, P.F.; Posthuma, D. Biological pathways and networks implicated in psychiatric disorders. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2015, 2, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Geschwind, D.H.; Flint, J. Genetics and genomics of psychiatric disease. Science 2015, 349, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grezenko, H.; Ekhator, C.; Nwabugwu, N.U.; Ganga, H.; Affaf, M.; Abdelaziz, A.M.; Rehman, A.; Shehryar, A.; Abbasi, F.A.; Bellegarde, S.B. Epigenetics in neurological and psychiatric disorders: A comprehensive review of current understanding and future perspectives. Cureus 2023, 15, e43960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nathan, P.J.; Phan, K.L.; Harmer, C.J.; Mehta, M.A.; Bullmore, E.T. Increasing pharmacological knowledge about human neurological and psychiatric disorders through functional neuroimaging and its application in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2014, 14, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iorio-Morin, C.; Sarica, C.; Elias, G.J.; Harmsen, I.; Hodaie, M. Neuroimaging of psychiatric disorders. Prog. Brain Res. 2022, 270, 149–169. [Google Scholar]
  9. Insel, T.R. Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: A strategic plan for research on mental illness. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schumann, G.; Binder, E.B.; Holte, A.; de Kloet, E.R.; Oedegaard, K.J.; Robbins, T.W.; Walker-Tilley, T.R.; Bitter, I.; Brown, V.J.; Buitelaar, J. Stratified medicine for mental disorders. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 24, 5–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Luca, M.; Destrebecq, F.; Kramer, S. Future of the aging brain: Bridging the gap between research and policy. Aging Brain 2021, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tanaka, M.; Schmidt, A.; Hassel, S. Case Reports in Neuroimaging and Stimulation. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1264669. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanaka, M.; Diano, M.; Battaglia, S. Insights into structural and functional organization of the brain: Evidence from neuroimaging and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1225755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tortora, F.; Hadipour, A.L.; Battaglia, S.; Falzone, A.; Avenanti, A.; Vicario, C.M. The role of Serotonin in fear learning and memory: A systematic review of human studies. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gandhi, A.B.; Kaleem, I.; Alexander, J.; Hisbulla, M.; Kannichamy, V.; Antony, I.; Mishra, V.; Banerjee, A.; Khan, S. Neuroplasticity Improves Bipolar Disorder: A Review. Cureus 2020, 12, e11241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rădulescu, I.; Drăgoi, A.M.; Trifu, S.C.; Cristea, M.B. Neuroplasticity and depression: Rewiring the brain’s networks through pharmacological therapy (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Thayer, J.F. Genetic differences associated with dopamine and serotonin release mediate fear-induced bradycardia in the human brain. Transl. Psychiatry 2024, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Thayer, J. Heart’s tale of trauma: Fear-conditioned heart rate changes in post-traumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Battaglia, S.; Nazzi, C.; Thayer, J. Fear-induced bradycardia in mental disorders: Foundations, current advances, future perspectives. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2023, 149, 105163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jászberényi, M.; Thurzó, B.; Bagosi, Z.; Vécsei, L.; Tanaka, M. The Orexin/Hypocretin System, the Peptidergic Regulator of Vigilance, Orchestrates Adaptation to Stress. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Terranova, C.; Rizzo, V.; Cacciola, A.; Chillemi, G.; Calamuneri, A.; Milardi, D.; Quartarone, A. Is there a future for non-invasive brain stimulation as a therapeutic tool? Front. Neurol. 2019, 9, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bandeira, I.D.; Lins-Silva, D.H.; Barouh, J.L.; Faria-Guimarães, D.; Dorea-Bandeira, I.; Souza, L.S.; Alves, G.S.; Brunoni, A.R.; Nitsche, M.; Fregni, F. Neuroplasticity and non-invasive brain stimulation in the developing brain. Prog. Brain Res. 2021, 264, 57–89. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanoglu, L.; Velioglu, H.A.; Hanoglu, T.; Yulug, B. Neuroimaging-guided transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in MCI: Toward an individual, effective and disease-modifying treatment. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2023, 54, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Battaglia, S.; Di Fazio, C.; Mazzà, M.; Tamietto, M.; Avenanti, A. Targeting Human Glucocorticoid Receptors in Fear Learning: A Multiscale Integrated Approach to Study Functional Connectivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Battaglia, M.R.; Di Fazio, C.; Battaglia, S. Activated tryptophan-kynurenine metabolic system in the human brain is associated with learned fear. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2023, 16, 1217090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Battaglia, S.; Di Fazio, C.; Vicario, C.M.; Avenanti, A. Neuropharmacological modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate, noradrenaline and endocannabinoid receptors in fear extinction learning: Synaptic transmission and plasticity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Tao, J.; Chen, L. The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Neurosci. 2019, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Brunoni, A.R.; Palm, U. Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatry: Mood disorders, schizophrenia and other psychiatric diseases. In Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Principles, Procedures and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 431–471. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kong, Q.; Li, T.; Reddy, S.; Hodges, S.; Kong, J. Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review. Neurotherapeutics 2023, 21, e00297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gregorio, F.; Battaglia, S. Advances in EEG-based functional connectivity approaches to the study of the central nervous system in health and disease. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2023, 32, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Di Gregorio, F.; Steinhauser, M.; Maier, M.E.; Thayer, J.F.; Battaglia, S. Error-related cardiac deceleration: Functional interplay between error-related brain activity and autonomic nervous system in performance monitoring. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2024, 157, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ippolito, G.; Bertaccini, R.; Tarasi, L.; Di Gregorio, F.; Trajkovic, J.; Battaglia, S.; Romei, V. The role of alpha oscillations among the main neuropsychiatric disorders in the adult and developing human brain: Evidence from the last 10 years of research. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Balogh, L.; Tanaka, M.; Török, N.; Vécsei, L.; Taguchi, S. Crosstalk between existential phenomenological psychotherapy and neurological sciences in mood and anxiety disorders. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Vécsei, L.; Giménez-Llort, L. Emerging translational research in neurological and psychiatric diseases: From in vitro to in vivo models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. Editorial of Special Issue “Crosstalk between Depression, Anxiety, and Dementia: Comorbidity in Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry”. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Vécsei, L. Integrating Armchair, Bench, and Bedside Research for Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry: Editorial. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. Monitoring the redox status in multiple sclerosis. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tanaka, M.; Bohár, Z.; Vécsei, L. Are kynurenines accomplices or principal villains in dementia? Maintenance of kynurenine metabolism. Molecules 2020, 25, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. de Oliveira Zanuso, B.; Dos Santos, A.R.d.O.; Miola, V.F.B.; Campos, L.M.G.; Spilla, C.S.G.; Barbalho, S.M. Panax ginseng and aging related disorders: A systematic review. Exp. Gerontol. 2022, 161, 111731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shah, N.J.; Oros-Peusquens, A.-M.; Arrubla, J.; Zhang, K.; Warbrick, T.; Mauler, J.; Vahedipour, K.; Romanzetti, S.; Felder, J.; Celik, A. Advances in multimodal neuroimaging: Hybrid MR–PET and MR–PET–EEG at 3 T and 9.4 T. J. Magn. Reson. 2013, 229, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yen, C.; Lin, C.L.; Chiang, M.C. Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroimaging: A Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Functioning and Disorders. Life 2023, 13, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, S.; Carpenter, L.L.; Jiang, H. Optical neuroimaging: Advancing transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments of psychiatric disorders. Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art 2022, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liloia, D.; Crocetta, A.; Cauda, F.; Duca, S.; Costa, T.; Manuello, J. Seeking Overlapping Neuroanatomical Alterations between Dyslexia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Replication Study. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liloia, D.; Manuello, J.; Costa, T.; Keller, R.; Nani, A.; Cauda, F. Atypical local brain connectivity in pediatric autism spectrum disorder? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of regional homogeneity studies. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2024, 274, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shibasaki, H. Human brain mapping: Hemodynamic response and electrophysiology. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hallett, M.; Di Iorio, R.; Rossini, P.M.; Park, J.E.; Chen, R.; Celnik, P.; Strafella, A.P.; Matsumoto, H.; Ugawa, Y. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017, 128, 2125–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gaston, T.E.; Nair, S.; Allendorfer, J.B.; Martin, R.C.; Beattie, J.F.; Szaflarski, J.P. Memory response and neuroimaging correlates of a novel cognitive rehabilitation program for memory problems in epilepsy: A pilot study. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2019, 37, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Reid, L.B.; Boyd, R.N.; Cunnington, R.; Rose, S.E. Interpreting intervention induced neuroplasticity with fMRI: The case for multimodal imaging strategies. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 2643491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Elkana, O.; Frost, R.; Kramer, U.; Ben-Bashat, D.; Schweiger, A. Cerebral language reorganization in the chronic stage of recovery: A longitudinal fMRI study. Cortex 2013, 49, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rassler, B.; Blinowska, K.; Kaminski, M.; Pfurtscheller, G. Analysis of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Directed Information Flow between Brain and Body Indicate Different Management Strategies of fMRI-Related Anxiety. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Papageorgiou, G.; Kasselimis, D.; Laskaris, N.; Potagas, C. Unraveling the Thread of Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Translational Cognitive Perspective. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borbély, K.; Emri, M.; Kenessey, I.; Tóth, M.; Singer, J.; Barsi, P.; Vajda, Z.; Pál, E.; Tóth, Z.; Beyer, T. Pet/Mri in the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: A concordance analysis. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Albuquerque, L.L.; Pantovic, M.; Clingo, M.; Fischer, K.; Jalene, S.; Landers, M.; Mari, Z.; Poston, B. A Single Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Fails to Enhance Motor Skill Acquisition in Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot Study. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ribeiro de Souza, F.; Sales, M.; Rabelo Laporte, L.; Melo, A.; Manoel da Silva Ribeiro, N. Body structure/function impairments and activity limitations of post-stroke that predict social participation: A systematic review. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2023, 30, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hubbard, C.S.; Khan, S.A.; Keaser, M.L.; Mathur, V.A.; Goyal, M.; Seminowicz, D.A. Altered brain structure and function correlate with disease severity and pain catastrophizing in migraine patients. eneuro 2014, 1, e20.14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guekht, A.B.; Mitrokhina, T.V.; Lebedeva, A.V.; Dzugaeva, F.K.; Milchakova, L.E.; Lokshina, O.B.; Feygina, A.A.; Gusev, E.I. Factors influencing on quality of life in people with epilepsy. Seizure 2007, 16, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nemeth, V.L.; Must, A.; Horvath, S.; Király, A.; Kincses, Z.T.; Vécsei, L. Gender-specific degeneration of dementia-related subcortical structures throughout the lifespan. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 55, 865–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Inoue, G.; Ohtaki, Y.; Satoh, K.; Odanaka, Y.; Katoh, A.; Suzuki, K.; Tomita, Y.; Eiraku, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Harano, K. Sedation Therapy in Intensive Care Units: Harnessing the Power of Antioxidants to Combat Oxidative Stress. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, B.; Wei, S.; Low, S.W.; Poore, C.P.; Lee, A.T.-H.; Nilius, B.; Liao, P. TRPM4 Blocking Antibody Protects Cerebral Vasculature in Delayed Stroke Reperfusion. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Spekker, E.; Bohár, Z.; Fejes-Szabó, A.; Szűcs, M.; Vécsei, L.; Párdutz, Á. Estradiol Treatment Enhances Behavioral and Molecular Changes Induced by Repetitive Trigeminal Activation in a Rat Model of Migraine. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cauda, F.; Nani, A.; Liloia, D.; Manuello, J.; Premi, E.; Duca, S.; Fox, P.T.; Costa, T. Finding specificity in structural brain alterations through Bayesian reverse inference. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020, 41, 4155–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Manuello, J.; Costa, T.; Cauda, F.; Liloia, D. Six actions to improve detection of critical features for neuroimaging coordinate-based meta-analysis preparation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 137, 104659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nani, A.; Manuello, J.; Mancuso, L.; Liloia, D.; Costa, T.; Vercelli, A.; Duca, S.; Cauda, F. The pathoconnectivity network analysis of the insular cortex: A morphometric fingerprinting. NeuroImage 2021, 225, 117481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tajti, J.; Szok, D.; Csáti, A.; Szabó, Á.; Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. Exploring novel therapeutic targets in the common pathogenic factors in migraine and neuropathic pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jiang, X.; Andjelkovic, A.V.; Zhu, L.; Yang, T.; Bennett, M.V.; Chen, J.; Keep, R.F.; Shi, Y. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and recovery after ischemic stroke. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018, 163, 144–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Marshall, R.S. The functional relevance of cerebral hemodynamics: Why blood flow matters to the injured and recovering brain. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2004, 17, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lyu, J.; Xie, D.; Bhatia, T.N.; Leak, R.K.; Hu, X.; Jiang, X. Microglial/Macrophage polarization and function in brain injury and repair after stroke. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2021, 27, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thrift, A.G.; Thayabaranathan, T.; Howard, G.; Howard, V.J.; Rothwell, P.M.; Feigin, V.L.; Norrving, B.; Donnan, G.A.; Cadilhac, D.A. Global stroke statistics. Int. J. Stroke 2017, 12, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lekoubou, A.; Nguyen, C.; Kwon, M.; Nyalundja, A.D.; Agrawal, A. Post-stroke Everything. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2023, 23, 785–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mead, G.E.; Sposato, L.A.; Sampaio Silva, G.; Yperzeele, L.; Wu, S.; Kutlubaev, M.; Cheyne, J.; Wahab, K.; Urrutia, V.C.; Sharma, V.K. A systematic review and synthesis of global stroke guidelines on behalf of the World Stroke Organization. Int. J. Stroke 2023, 18, 499–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Salafutdinov, I.I.; Gatina, D.Z.; Markelova, M.I.; Garanina, E.E.; Malanin, S.Y.; Gazizov, I.M.; Izmailov, A.A.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Islamov, R.R.; Palotás, A. A Biosafety Study of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells Transduced with Adenoviral Vector Carrying Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor cDNA In Vitro. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ikonnikova, A.; Anisimova, A.; Galkin, S.; Gunchenko, A.; Abdukhalikova, Z.; Filippova, M.; Surzhikov, S.; Selyaeva, L.; Shershov, V.; Zasedatelev, A. Genetic Association Study and Machine Learning to Investigate Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Aspirin. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Koban, L.; Gianaros, P.J.; Kober, H.; Wager, T.D. The self in context: Brain systems linking mental and physical health. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 22, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Morrey, L.B.; Roberts, W.O.; Wichser, L. Exercise-related mental health problems and solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2020, 19, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kivimäki, M.; Batty, G.D.; Pentti, J.; Shipley, M.J.; Sipilä, P.N.; Nyberg, S.T.; Suominen, S.B.; Oksanen, T.; Stenholm, S.; Virtanen, M. Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: A multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e140–e149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Momen, N.C.; Plana-Ripoll, O.; Agerbo, E.; Benros, M.E.; Børglum, A.D.; Christensen, M.K.; Dalsgaard, S.; Degenhardt, L.; de Jonge, P.; Debost, J.-C.P. Association between mental disorders and subsequent medical conditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nielsen, R.E.; Banner, J.; Jensen, S.E. Cardiovascular disease in patients with severe mental illness. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. De Hert, M.; Correll, C.U.; Bobes, J.; Cetkovich-Bakmas, M.; Cohen, D.; Asai, I.; Detraux, J.; Gautam, S.; Möller, H.-J.; Ndetei, D.M. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry 2011, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Edmondson, D.; Conroy, D.; Romero-Canyas, R.; Tanenbaum, M.; Czajkowski, S. Climate change, behavior change and health: A multidisciplinary, translational and multilevel perspective. Transl. Behav. Med. 2022, 12, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Erdemir, A.; Mulugeta, L.; Ku, J.P.; Drach, A.; Horner, M.; Morrison, T.M.; Peng, G.C.; Vadigepalli, R.; Lytton, W.W.; Myers, J.G., Jr. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: Ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Craske, M.G.; Herzallah, M.M.; Nusslock, R.; Patel, V. From neural circuits to communities: An integrative multidisciplinary roadmap for global mental health. Nat. Ment. Health 2023, 1, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sobolewska-Nowak, J.; Wachowska, K.; Nowak, A.; Orzechowska, A.; Szulc, A.; Płaza, O.; Gałecki, P. Exploring the heart–mind connection: Unraveling the shared pathways between depression and cardiovascular diseases. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Festa, F.; Medori, S.; Macrì, M. Move Your Body, Boost Your Brain: The Positive Impact of Physical Activity on Cognition across All Age Groups. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. De Micheli, A.; Provenzani, U.; Krakowski, K.; Oliver, D.; Damiani, S.; Brondino, N.; McGuire, P.; Fusar-Poli, P. Physical Health and Transition to Psychosis in People at Clinical High Risk. Biomedicines 2024, 2024, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Feigin, V.L.; Vos, T.; Nichols, E.; Owolabi, M.O.; Carroll, W.M.; Dichgans, M.; Deuschl, G.; Parmar, P.; Brainin, M.; Murray, C. The global burden of neurological disorders: Translating evidence into policy. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hyman, S.E. Psychiatric Disorders: Grounded in Human Biology but Not Natural Kinds. Perspect. Biol. Med. 2021, 64, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vigo, D.; Thornicroft, G.; Atun, R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sheppard, O.; Coleman, M. Alzheimer’s Disease: Etiology, Neuropathology and Pathogenesis. In Alzheimer’s Disease: Drug Discovery; Huang, X., Ed.; Exon Publications Copyright: Brisbane, AU, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  89. Blokhin, I.O.; Khorkova, O.; Saveanu, R.V.; Wahlestedt, C. Molecular mechanisms of psychiatric diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 146, 105136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Akhtar, A.; Andleeb, A.; Waris, T.S.; Bazzar, M.; Moradi, A.R.; Awan, N.R.; Yar, M. Neurodegenerative diseases and effective drug delivery: A review of challenges and novel therapeutics. J. Control. Release 2021, 330, 1152–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Semahegn, A.; Torpey, K.; Manu, A.; Assefa, N.; Tesfaye, G.; Ankomah, A. Psychotropic medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with major psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tanaka, M.; Chen, C. Towards a mechanistic understanding of depression, anxiety, and their comorbidity: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1268156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Matias, J.N.; Achete, G.; Campanari, G.S.d.S.; Guiguer, E.L.; Araújo, A.C.; Buglio, D.S.; Barbalho, S.M. A systematic review of the antidepressant effects of curcumin: Beyond monoamines theory. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2021, 55, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Buglio, D.S.; Marton, L.T.; Laurindo, L.F.; Guiguer, E.L.; Araújo, A.C.; Buchaim, R.L.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Rubira, C.J.; Barbalho, S.M. The role of resveratrol in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. J. Med. Food 2022, 25, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Polyák, H.; Galla, Z.; Nánási, N.; Cseh, E.K.; Rajda, C.; Veres, G.; Spekker, E.; Szabó, Á.; Klivényi, P.; Tanaka, M. The tryptophan-kynurenine metabolic system is suppressed in cuprizone-induced model of demyelination simulating progressive multiple sclerosis. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Barbalho, S.M.; Bueno Ottoboni, A.M.M.; Fiorini, A.M.R.; Guiguer, E.L.; Nicolau, C.C.T.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Flato, U.A.P. Grape juice or wine: Which is the best option? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3876–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Barbalho, S.M.; Direito, R.; Laurindo, L.F.; Marton, L.T.; Guiguer, E.L.; Goulart, R.d.A.; Tofano, R.J.; Carvalho, A.C.; Flato, U.A.P.; Capelluppi Tofano, V.A. Ginkgo biloba in the aging process: A narrative review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tanaka, M.; Szabó, Á.; Körtési, T.; Szok, D.; Tajti, J.; Vécsei, L. From CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and Beyond: Unraveling the Next Chapters in Migraine Treatment. Cells 2023, 12, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gruchot, J.; Herrero, F.; Weber-Stadlbauer, U.; Meyer, U.; Küry, P. Interplay between activation of endogenous retroviruses and inflammation as common pathogenic mechanism in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 2023, 107, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Northoff, G.; Hirjak, D.; Wolf, R.C.; Magioncalda, P.; Martino, M. All roads lead to the motor cortex: Psychomotor mechanisms and their biochemical modulation in psychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Küpeli Akkol, E.; Tatlı Çankaya, I.; Şeker Karatoprak, G.; Carpar, E.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Capasso, R. Natural Compounds as Medical Strategies in the Prevention and Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders Seen in Neurological Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 669638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yohn, S.E.; Weiden, P.J.; Felder, C.C.; Stahl, S.M. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for psychotic disorders: Bench-side to clinic. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 43, 1098–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030613

AMA Style

Tanaka M, Vécsei L. From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3):613. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanaka, Masaru, and László Vécsei. 2024. "From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders" Biomedicines 12, no. 3: 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030613

APA Style

Tanaka, M., & Vécsei, L. (2024). From Lab to Life: Exploring Cutting-Edge Models for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Biomedicines, 12(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop