Next Article in Journal
Fate of External Carotid Artery Following Carotid Artery Stenting for Internal Carotid Artery near Occlusion
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Male Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Based on Symptom Scores and Noninvasive Office-Based Diagnostic Tools
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Urobilin Derived from Bilirubin Bioconversion Binds Albumin and May Interfere with Bilirubin Interacting with Albumin: Implications for Disease Pathology

by
Kevin I. Williams
1,2,
Priyanka Suryadevara
3,
Chang-Guo Zhan
3,
Terry D. Hinds, Jr.
1,4,5,* and
Zachary A. Kipp
1,*
1
Drug & Disease Discovery D3 Research Center, Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centre College, Danville, KY 40422, USA
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
4
Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
5
Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020302
Submission received: 21 December 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2025 / Accepted: 24 January 2025 / Published: 26 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology and Metabolism Research)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Bilirubin is a hydrophobic molecule that binds the carrier protein albumin for transport through systemic circulation. Bilirubin is cleared from the body through the liver and excreted into the intestines, where the microbiota modifies the chemical structure, forming urobilin, which can be reabsorbed into circulation by the hepatic portal vein. Urobilin has no known function. It is also unknown whether urobilin binds albumin for transport in circulation. We hypothesized that because of the likeness of their chemical structures, urobilin would also bind albumin like bilirubin does. Methods: First, we used in silico docking to predict if urobilin would bind to albumin and compared it to the bilirubin binding sites. To test this binding in vitro, we applied bilirubin’s fluorescent property, which occurs when it is bound to a protein, including albumin, and exposed to light. We also used this method to determine if urobilin could exhibit autofluorescence when protein bound. Results: We found that bilirubin was predicted to bind albumin at amino acids E208, K212, D237, and K240 through hydrogen bonds. However, urobilin was predicted to bind albumin using different hydrogen bonds at amino acids H67, K240, and E252. We found that urobilin has a fluorescent property that can be quantified when bound to albumin. We performed a concentration response for urobilin–albumin fluorescent binding and observed a direct relationship between the urobilin level and the fluorescence intensity. Conclusions: The in silico docking analysis and autofluorescence results demonstrate that urobilin binds to albumin and might compete with bilirubin. This is the first study to identify a urobilin-binding protein and the important aspects of its physiological function and transport in circulation.

1. Introduction

The breakdown of red blood cells commences the production of bilirubin from heme [1], which ultimately travels to the intestine and is converted to urobilin [2]. Bilirubin is protective against cardiometabolic diseases [3,4], including obesity [5], diabetes [6], hypertension [7,8], and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) [9]. Bilirubin functions as a potent antioxidant [10] and also as a hormone by activating the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) [11,12,13,14,15]. Bilirubin is produced mostly in the spleen, which enters systemic circulation to reach its target organs. Due to its hydrophobic nature, bilirubin is tightly bound to albumin in plasma as a carrier protein [16]. Once in the liver, bilirubin is conjugated by UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1), which increases bilirubin’s solubility for excretion through the biliary system into the intestines [17]. In the gut, bacteria remove the conjugation and change the chemical structure to form urobilinogen, which is rapidly oxidized into urobilin [2]. Hall et al. discovered the enzyme responsible for the bioconversion of bilirubin to urobilinogen in the bacterial genome, bilirubin reductase (BilR), which is primarily in the Firmicutes species [18]. Urobilin can be reabsorbed through the hepatic portal system into the systemic circulation. Unlike bilirubin, urobilin has been positively associated with adiposity, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease [2,19,20,21]. The physiological function of urobilin and whether it utilizes albumin as a carrier protein for transport in circulation is unknown.
Bilirubin has a natural autofluorescent property when bound to a protein, which has been well documented for the bilirubin–albumin interaction [22,23,24,25]. A study published in 1973 by Davies et al. used absorbance difference spectrophotometry and found that bilirubin fluoresced when in the presence of either human or bovine serum albumin [26]. Bilirubin has a similar binding affinity to albumin from different species, indicating that it is a conserved mechanism for blood transport [27]. Gordon et al. used the autofluorescent property of bilirubin to show that bilirubin binds to PPARα [15], indicating that the autofluorescent property can be used for detecting other proteins bound. Binding was demonstrated using a non-fluorescent PPARα ligand, which developed a form of a non-radioactive competitive binding assay that utilized bilirubin’s autofluorescent properties similar to radioactive and non-radioactive competitive binding assays [15]. The non-radioactive competitive binding assay was further used to identify the amino acids required for bilirubin to bind in the PPARα ligand-binding pocket and that bilirubin did not bind PPARγ [28]. However, it is unknown whether urobilin has autofluorescent properties similar to bilirubin or if it binds albumin for transport in circulation.
In this study, we investigated whether urobilin binds albumin and has autofluorescent properties similar to bilirubin. We utilized in silico docking analysis to fit bilirubin and urobilin in the binding pocket of albumin, and autofluorescent assays were used to determine if urobilin binds to albumin in vitro. We found that urobilin likely binds albumin and has a similar autofluorescent property as bilirubin when it binds to a protein. This is the first study to show this property of urobilin and its binding to albumin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Alkali Scientific, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Fischer Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA), unconjugated bilirubin (EMD Millipore Corp, Burlington, MA, USA), urobilin (Frontier Scientific, Newark, DE, USA), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) were used in this study.

2.2. Chemical Structures

The chemical structures in Figure 1 were drawn using ChemDraw version 22.2.0.3348 (Revvity Signals Software, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Molecular Docking Analysis

The initial structures of the ligands used in the present study were sketched and prepared at a pH of 7.4 using the LigPrep module of Schrödinger 2024-1 [22,23]. This ligand preparation procedure includes generating all the possible tautomeric and ionization states and a ligand’s stereoisomers (if any) [24]. All the generated ligand conformers were minimized using the OPLS4 force field [25]. Energy minimization involves the generation of the low-energy conformer of a ligand by the addition of hydrogen, assigning bond lengths and bond angles. The generated conformers were used for molecular docking studies.
The crystal structure of human serum albumin (PDB ID: 1BM0) was prepared for molecular docking using the Protein Preparation Wizard of Schrödinger 2024-1 [26,27]. This process ensures the structural correctness of a protein with high confidence accuracy. Protein preparation includes the assignment of bond orders, removal of water molecules, the addition of hydrogens, ionization of amino acids at a pH of 7.4, optimization of hydrogen bonds, and energy minimization of the protein. The generated protein state was used for the docking studies.
The prepared structures of ligands and protein underwent docking studies using the Glide module of Schrödinger 2024-1 [28]. Glide employs a grid-based docking protocol, where a grid is generated encircling the protein’s binding pocket. Scaling factor 1.0 was fixed for the van der Waals radii of non-polar atoms and 0.25 for the partial charge cut-off. Extra precision (XP) docking was performed, ensuring the highest accuracy level in studying the protein–ligand interactions within the available options provided by the software. The XP descriptors generated in this study were used to analyze the docking results.

2.4. General Autofluorescence Assay Setup

The autofluorescence assay was performed as previously described in [15,28]. Briefly, in a black flat-bottom 96-well plate, bovine serum albumin (BSA) (final concentration 50 µM), bilirubin (final concentration 50 µM), urobilin (final concentration 50 µM), DMSO, and/or PBS was added to the wells. Once compounds were added to the plate, the plate was protected with foil to avoid light degradation. The excitation and emission spectra of the samples were measured using the top-read Varioskan LUX Plate Reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The samples were read in 5 nm steps with excitation and emission filters. The excitation spectra were recorded from 300 to 495 nm at emission 520 nm. Once the maximal excitation for urobilin bound to the albumin was recorded, the wavelength of the peak was set at the excitation value (490 nm) and used for the excitation wavelength for the subsequent emission spectrum from 510 to 700 nm.

2.5. Concentration–Response Autofluorescence Assay Setup

The concentration–response autofluorescence assay was performed as described above in Section 2.4 and as described previously [15,28]. An increasing concentration of urobilin was used from 0.78 to 300 μM. The plate was read over emission spectra from 510 to 700 nm at excitation 490 nm.

2.6. Competitive Binding Autofluorescence Assay Setup

The competitive binding assay was performed as described above in 2.4 and as described previously [15,28]. The amount of bilirubin and urobilin were adjusted to determine if they bind competitively. For both bilirubin and urobilin, 100% = 50 μM, 75% = 37.5 μM, 50% = 25 μM, and 25% = 12.5 μM. The plate was read over the emission spectra from 510 to 700 nm at excitation 490 nm.

2.7. Statistics

The data were graphed and analyzed via Prism 10 GraphPad Prism version 10.3.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA, with the least significant difference post hoc test was used to compare the area under the curve for each condition. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Structural Difference Between Bilirubin and Urobilin

After being produced, bilirubin travels through systemic circulation primarily bound to albumin. Bilirubin is conjugated in the liver by UGT1A1 and transported into the intestines through bile for excretion. Once in the intestines, bacteria species that harbor the bilirubin reductase enzyme remove the conjugation and produce urobilinogen rapidly oxidized to urobilin (Figure 1). The alternation in the chemical structure changes its chemical properties, whereas urobilin is more hydrophilic than bilirubin. Urobilin is then reabsorbed into circulation through the hepatic portal vein. However, it is unknown if urobilin binds albumin to be transported in circulation similar to that of bilirubin.
Figure 1. The bioconversion of bilirubin to urobilin alters the chemical structure. The red bonds in urobilin denote those that are different compared to bilirubin.
Figure 1. The bioconversion of bilirubin to urobilin alters the chemical structure. The red bonds in urobilin denote those that are different compared to bilirubin.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g001

3.2. Molecular Docking of Bilirubin and Urobilin to Albumin

In silico modeling was used to dock bilirubin and urobilin into the binding pocket of human serum albumin, which contains two primary binding sites, named site I and site II [29]. Our in silico docking analysis predicted bilirubin binds to albumin through four hydrogen bonds at D237, K212, E208, and K240 (Figure 2A). In addition to the hydrogen bonds, bilirubin forms salt bridges with K212 and K240 of albumin. We then used our analysis to dock urobilin with human albumin. Urobilin was predicted to bind albumin through three hydrogen bonds at H67, K240, and E252 and a salt linkage with K240 (Figure 2B). Interestingly, K240 interacts with both bilirubin and urobilin.

3.3. Autoflourescent Property of Urobilin When Bound to Albumin

The autofluorescent properties of bilirubin and urobilin were utilized to investigate the binding to albumin in vitro. The autofluorescent property of bilirubin has been well described, whereas bilirubin alone does not fluoresce. Once albumin or another bilirubin-binding protein, such as PPARα, is added, bilirubin autofluorescence increases the fluorescence intensity (RFU) (Figure 3A). The binding was measured over excitation spectra at an emission of 520 nm, which is in line with the previous literature [15,28]. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and graphed. Bilirubin + albumin had a significantly higher area compared to albumin and bilirubin alone. The autofluorescence assay was repeated using urobilin instead of bilirubin to determine if it has a similar property and can bind to albumin. Albumin alone had no fluorescence. However, urobilin alone had a marginal background fluorescence. This fluorescence was intensified when urobilin was incubated with albumin (Figure 3B). The AUC was significantly higher in the urobilin + albumin than in the two alone. This indicates that urobilin has a similar autofluorescence property to bilirubin, which fluoresces when bound to protein and urobilin binds albumin. Both bilirubin and urobilin binding to albumin were measured over an excitation spectrum reading at emission wavelength 520 nm. The fluorescent intensity of bilirubin and urobilin peaked at different excitation wavelengths, 465 nm for bilirubin and 490 nm for urobilin, which is consistent with the previous fluorescent studies for bilirubin [15,28] and urobilin [30,31].

3.4. Concentration Response of Urobilin Binding to Albumin

We designed a urobilin–albumin concentration–response experiment to explore the binding relationship between urobilin and albumin. We measured the urobilin concentration response to the binding using an emission spectrum at an excitation of 490 nm, which was determined based on the peak in Figure 3. As the urobilin concentration increased from 0.78 to 300 μM, we observed a higher fluorescent peak for the urobilin + albumin interaction (Figure 4). This indicates the urobilin-albumin binding relationship is concentration-dependent.

3.5. Bilirubin Competes with Urobilin for Binding to Albumin

Finally, a competitive binding assay was performed using different percentages of bilirubin and urobilin with albumin to determine if it altered the amount of fluorescence measured. We found that fluorescence intensity decreased when bilirubin was incubated with urobilin and albumin compared to only urobilin and albumin (Figure 5). Future investigations are needed to determine if they bind together or have secondary binding sites.

3.6. Graphical Conclusion

The data above indicate that urobilin binds to albumin. Urobilin is formed in the intestines, where microbiota expresses the BilR enzyme. This enzyme catabolizes bilirubin to form urobilinogen, which is then oxidized into urobilin. Urobilin enters circulation through the hepatic port vein, where it binds albumin (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The significance of our study is that it is the first to identify that urobilin binds to albumin and that bilirubin and urobilin are likely to bind to different albumin amino acids. There is no known physiological function or receptor for urobilin. Almost a century ago, urinary urobilin/urobilinogen was positively associated with heart failure [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. More recent literature surrounding urobilin is primarily derived from non-targeting mass spectrometry studies [19,20,39]. In humans, urobilin has been positively correlated with increased visceral fat area [19], all-cause mortality in diabetic patients [20], and heart failure [39]. A study by Smith et al. found that urobilin was positively associated with cardiovascular disease mortality, overall mortality, type 2 diabetes, and stroke, and its levels decreased with a health-conscious dietary pattern [40]. A study using untargeted metabolomics found that converting bilirubin to urobilin is a biomarker for chronic chagas cardiomyopathy in humans [41]. In a study on obese and lean humans, we identified that plasma urobilin was positively associated with adiposity and insulin resistance [13]. In animal models, urobilin was positively associated with acute myocardial ischemia [21] and diet-induced obesity [42]. Future studies are needed to determine urobilin’s mechanisms and diseases it’s associated with.
The inverse roles of urobilin and bilirubin in the cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome have been discussed [2], and the two molecules may have different functions. Bilirubin’s function is likely the opposite of urobilin, where it protects against cardiometabolic dysfunction [9,43]. Bilirubin functions as an antioxidant [10] and a hormone through PPARα to activate fat-burning pathways [11,44]. In animal models of diet-induced obesity, bilirubin nanoparticles lower adiposity [15], MASLD [14], and hepatic ceramide production [13,14,15]. Bilirubin nanoparticles also protect against cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury [45] and atherosclerosis [46].
Enzymes that produce bilirubin, such as biliverdin reductase A (BVRA), [47] are essential to liver function as a loss in hepatocytes causes lipid accumulation and oxidative stress [48,49,50], which also occurs in kidney cells [51]. However, it has been demonstrated that blocking UGT1A1, specifically in the liver, using an RNAi targeted to the liver, caused an increase in bilirubin and a reduction in plasma urobilin [52]. The UGT1A1-RNAi lowered plasma urobilin levels, adiposity, glucose intolerance, hepatic lipid accumulation, and pro-inflammatory kinase signaling pathways, which suggests targeting UGT1A1 to control urobilin levels as a potential therapeutic [52,53]. Whether bilirubin and urobilin have similar roles in hepatic disease is unknown. More investigations on their functions in liver fibrosis [54] and insulin resistance [55] are needed to better understand their roles, as the pathways they control might be diverse.
Bilirubin requires albumin as a carrier protein to travel through systemic circulation, but whether urobilin also binds to albumin was unknown until this study. Our in silico docking analysis showed that bilirubin and urobilin bind to albumin. We found that bilirubin interacts with D237, K212, E208, and K240 in site I of albumin. Previous in vitro studies determined that K240 is responsible for bilirubin’s high affinity towards human albumin [56]. This site is slightly shifted in bovine albumin, where residues 186–238 are important for bilirubin binding [57]. Bilirubin’s carboxyl tail interacts with K240 and, interestingly, we found that urobilin also interacts with K240 of human albumin. The carboxyl tails are conserved between bilirubin and urobilin, which may explain why they interact with K240. There were no other residues in common between urobilin and bilirubin. In addition to K240, urobilin interacted with H67 and E252 of human albumin through hydrogen bonds, indicating strong binding.
When bilirubin binds to a protein and is excited by light, it autofluoresces, which can be measured [23,24]. The bilirubin–PPARα interaction has been investigated through the use of bilirubin’s autofluorescent property. Adeosun et al. showed that biliverdin to bilirubin could be measured by using the UnaG fluorescent protein from the unagi eel [58] to quantify unconjugated bilirubin levels. Gordon et al. used bilirubin’s autofluorescence from light excitement to show that it binds to PPARα and elicits a similar autofluorescence as when it binds to albumin [15]. Using site-directed mutagenesis, mutations were made at the predicted bilirubin binding sites of PPARα, and we found that mutating amino acids T283 and A333 of PPARα significantly reduced the fluorescence intensity [28]. We applied the same autofluorescence assay to investigate if urobilin binds to albumin. We found that although urobilin had background fluorescence by itself, the fluorescent intensity significantly increased when combined with albumin. This indicates that urobilin binds to albumin and autofluoresces, similar to bilirubin. When comparing the excitation spectrum, bilirubin and urobilin peaked at different wavelengths, 465 nm and 490 nm, respectively. To date, this is the only urobilin-binding protein that has been identified.
The physiological importance of urobilin binding to albumin is still unknown and requires more studies. Urobilin may use albumin strictly as a carrier protein, but this interaction may also change the pharmacology of urobilin binding to its receptor if one is uncovered or it might interfere with bilirubin binding albumin. The binding of molecules to albumin has been shown to increase their half-life [59]. The binding of urobilin to albumin may extend its half-life by preventing its urinary excretion, but this still requires more testing. Also, aspects of urobilin in physiology, such as whether its plasma levels change with exercise like bilirubin [60,61,62] needs further investigation. It is possible that urobilin levels might decrease with exercise based on its association with increased adiposity and insulin resistance in humans [13,63]. Future studies should investigate the relationship between plasma and urinary urobilin with albumin levels, urobilin with the metabolic diseases described above, and other conditions in which bilirubin has been found to be a positive regulator [64], as urobilin may have an opposing role.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this work has identified albumin as the first protein shown to bind urobilin. We also show that urobilin has an autofluorescent property like bilirubin, and both autofluoresce when bound to protein but at different peak wavelengths. Future work is needed to elucidate the physiological function of urobilin and if it has a definitive role in disease(s), especially CKM syndrome. The findings of our investigation are an initial step in understanding urobilin and its importance in physiology and disease pathology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.A.K. and T.D.H.J.; methodology, K.I.W., P.S. and Z.A.K.; validation, K.I.W., P.S. and Z.A.K.; formal analysis, K.I.W., P.S. and Z.A.K.; investigation, K.I.W., P.S. and Z.A.K.; resources, T.D.H.J.; data curation, P.S., C.-G.Z. and Z.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.I.W. and Z.A.K.; writing—review and editing, K.I.W., P.S., C.-G.Z., T.D.H.J. and Z.A.K.; visualization, K.I.W., P.S. and Z.A.K.; supervision, C.-G.Z. and Z.A.K.; project administration, Z.A.K.; funding acquisition, Z.A.K. and T.D.H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) F31HL170972 (Z.A.K.), R01DK121797 (T.D.H.J.), and R01DA058933 (T.D.H.J.). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Summer Undergraduate Research in Environmental Health Sciences (SURES) program at the University of Kentucky for supporting K.I.W. during this research study. The authors also thank the Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation (CPRI) at the University of Kentucky. The CPRI is supported by the Center for Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation (CPRI, NIH P20 GM130456) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR001998). Figure 6 was made using Adobe Stock photos 536420418, 456401232, and 456401244, licensed to the University of Kentucky.

Conflicts of Interest

T.D.H.J. has submitted patents on bilirubin- and obesity-related disorders. The other authors have nothing to declare or any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vitek, L.; Hinds, T.D.; Stec, D.E.; Tiribelli, C. The physiology of bilirubin: Health and disease equilibrium. Trends Mol. Med. 2023, 29, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kipp, Z.A.; Badmus, O.O.; Stec, D.E.; Hall, B.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin bioconversion to urobilin in the gut-liver-kidney axis: A biomarker for insulin resistance in the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome. Metabolism 2024, 163, 156081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. Bilirubin, a Cardiometabolic Signaling Molecule. Hypertension 2018, 72, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Badmus, O.O.; Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. Mechanisms Linking Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) to Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2023, 25, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choi, S.H.; Yun, K.E.; Choi, H.J. Relationships between serum total bilirubin levels and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2013, 23, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheriyath, P.; Gorrepati, V.S.; Peters, I.; Nookala, V.; Murphy, M.E.; Srouji, N.; Fischman, D. High Total Bilirubin as a Protective Factor for Diabetes Mellitus: An Analysis of NHANES Data From 1999–2006. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2010, 2, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chin, H.J.; Song, Y.R.; Kim, H.S.; Park, M.; Yoon, H.J.; Na, K.Y.; Kim, Y.; Chae, D.W.; Kim, S. The bilirubin level is negatively correlated with the incidence of hypertension in normotensive Korean population. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2009, 24 (Suppl. S1), S50–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vera, T.; Granger, J.P.; Stec, D.E. Inhibition of bilirubin metabolism induces moderate hyperbilirubinemia and attenuates ANG II-dependent hypertension in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 297, R738–R743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Creeden, J.F.; Gordon, D.M.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin as a metabolic hormone: The physiological relevance of low levels. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 320, E191–E207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stocker, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; McDonagh, A.F.; Glazer, A.N.; Ames, B.N. Bilirubin is an antioxidant of possible physiological importance. Science 1987, 235, 1043–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stec, D.E.; John, K.; Trabbic, C.J.; Luniwal, A.; Hankins, M.W.; Baum, J.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin Binding to PPARalpha Inhibits Lipid Accumulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gordon, D.M.; Blomquist, T.M.; Miruzzi, S.A.; McCullumsmith, R.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. RNA sequencing in human HepG2 hepatocytes reveals PPAR-alpha mediates transcriptome responsiveness of bilirubin. Physiol. Genomics 2019, 51, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kipp, Z.A.; Martinez, G.J.; Bates, E.A.; Maharramov, A.B.; Flight, R.M.; Moseley, H.N.B.; Morris, A.J.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin Nanoparticle Treatment in Obese Mice Inhibits Hepatic Ceramide Production and Remodels Liver Fat Content. Metabolites 2023, 13, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Creeden, J.F.; Gordon, D.M.; Stec, D.F.; Donald, M.C.; Stec, D.E. Bilirubin Nanoparticles Reduce Diet-Induced Hepatic Steatosis, Improve Fat Utilization, and Increase Plasma beta-Hydroxybutyrate. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 594574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gordon, D.M.; Neifer, K.L.; Hamoud, A.A.; Hawk, C.F.; Nestor-Kalinoski, A.L.; Miruzzi, S.A.; Morran, M.P.; Adeosun, S.O.; Sarver, J.G.; Erhardt, P.W.; et al. Bilirubin remodels murine white adipose tissue by reshaping mitochondrial activity and the coregulator profile of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 9804–9822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jacobsen, J.; Brodersen, R. Albumin-bilirubin binding mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 6319–6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hamoud, A.R.; Weaver, L.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin in the Liver-Gut Signaling Axis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hall, B.; Levy, S.; Dufault-Thompson, K.; Arp, G.; Zhong, A.; Ndjite, G.M.; Weiss, A.; Braccia, D.; Jenkins, C.; Grant, M.R.; et al. BilR is a gut microbial enzyme that reduces bilirubin to urobilinogen. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baek, S.H.; Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Kang, M.; Yoo, H.J.; Lee, N.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Song, M.; Lee, J.H. Metabolites distinguishing visceral fat obesity and atherogenic traits in individuals with overweight. Obesity 2017, 25, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ottosson, F.; Smith, E.; Fernandez, C.; Melander, O. Plasma Metabolites Associate with All-Cause Mortality in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Metabolites 2020, 10, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, L.; Jia, H.; Li, J.; Yu, M.; Yang, Y.; Tian, D.; Zhang, H.; Zou, Z. Cecal Gut Microbiota and Metabolites Might Contribute to the Severity of Acute Myocardial Ischemia by Impacting the Intestinal Permeability, Oxidative Stress, and Energy Metabolism. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Croce, A.C.; Ferrigno, A.; Bottiroli, G.; Di Pasqua, L.G.; Berardo, C.; Vairetti, M. Fluorescence excitation properties of bilirubin in solution and in serum. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2021, 215, 112121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Croce, A.C.; Ferrigno, A.; Santin, G.; Vairetti, M.; Bottiroli, G. Bilirubin: An autofluorescence bile biomarker for liver functionality monitoring. J. Biophotonics 2014, 7, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lamola, A.A.; Russo, M. Fluorescence excitation spectrum of bilirubin in blood: A model for the action spectrum for phototherapy of neonatal jaundice. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 294–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Croce, A.C.; Ferrigno, A.; Palladini, G.; Mannucci, B.; Vairetti, M.; Di Pasqua, L.G. Fatty Acids and Bilirubin as Intrinsic Autofluorescence Serum Biomarkers of Drug Action in a Rat Model of Liver Ischemia and Reperfusion. Molecules 2023, 28, 3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Davies, R.E.; Keohane, S.J. Early changes in light-irradiated solutions of bilirubin: A spectrophotometric analysis. Photochem. Photobiol. 1973, 17, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Athar, H.; Ahmad, N.; Tayyab, S.; Qasim, M.A. Use of fluorescence enhancement technique to study bilirubin-albumin interaction. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999, 25, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gordon, D.M.; Hong, S.H.; Kipp, Z.A.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Identification of Binding Regions of Bilirubin in the Ligand-Binding Pocket of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-A (PPARalpha). Molecules 2021, 26, 2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nishi, K.; Yamasaki, K.; Otagiri, M. Serum Albumin, Lipid and Drug Binding. Subcell Biochem. 2020, 94, 383–397. [Google Scholar]
  30. Masahiko Taniguchi, J.S.L. Absorption and fluorescence spectra of open-chain tetrapyrrole pigments–bilirubins, biliverdins, phycobilins, and synthetic analogues. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2023, 55, 100585. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pasquier, C.; Gossauer, A.; Keller, W.; Kratky, C. Syntheses of bile pigments. Part 15. First unequivocal assignment of the absolute configuration of an urobilinoid bile pigment by X-ray diffraction analysis of its synthetic precursor. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 2098–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Branwood, A.W. Some observations on liver function in heart failure. Edinb. Med. J. 1950, 57, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chávez, I.; Sepúlveda, B.; Ortega, A.I. The Functional Value of the Liver in Heart Disease: An Experimental Study. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1943, 121, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Das, G.; Nussbaum, H.E.; Leff, W.A. Hepatic function in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1974, 230, 1558–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Edelman, M.H.; Halpern, L.; Killian, J.A. Urobilinuria: Its Prognostic Value in Children with Heart Disease. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1930, 39, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Evans, J.M.; Wood, O.H.; Brew, E.M. Increased urinary urobilinogen following acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1952, 6, 925–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jolliffe, N. Liver Function in Congestive Heart Failure. J. Clin. Investig. 1930, 8, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rabinowitch, I.M. Relationship between impairment of liver function and premature development of arteriosclerosis in diabetes mellitus. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1948, 58, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Stenemo, M.; Ganna, A.; Salihovic, S.; Nowak, C.; Sundstrom, J.; Giedraitis, V.; Broeckling, C.D.; Prenni, J.E.; Svensson, P.; Magnusson, P.K.E.; et al. The metabolites urobilin and sphingomyelin (30:1) are associated with incident heart failure in the general population. ESC Heart Fail. 2019, 6, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smith, E.; Ottosson, F.; Hellstrand, S.; Ericson, U.; Orho-Melander, M.; Fernandez, C.; Melander, O. Ergothioneine is associated with reduced mortality and decreased risk of cardiovascular disease. Heart 2020, 106, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Herreros-Cabello, A.; Bosch-Nicolau, P.; Perez-Molina, J.A.; Salvador, F.; Monge-Maillo, B.; Rodriguez-Palomares, J.F.; Ribeiro, A.L.P.; Sanchez-Montalva, A.; Sabino, E.C.; Norman, F.F.; et al. Identification of Chagas disease biomarkers using untargeted metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 18768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Walker, A.; Pfitzner, B.; Neschen, S.; Kahle, M.; Harir, M.; Lucio, M.; Moritz, F.; Tziotis, D.; Witting, M.; Rothballer, M.; et al. Distinct signatures of host-microbial meta-metabolome and gut microbiome in two C57BL/6 strains under high-fat diet. ISME J. 2014, 8, 2380–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. Bilirubin Safeguards Cardiorenal and Metabolic Diseases: A Protective Role in Health. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2019, 21, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Hosick, P.A.; Chen, S.; Tukey, R.H.; Hankins, M.W.; Nestor-Kalinoski, A.; Stec, D.E. Mice with hyperbilirubinemia due to Gilbert’s syndrome polymorphism are resistant to hepatic steatosis by decreased serine 73 phosphorylation of PPARalpha. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 312, E244–E252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ai, W.; Bae, S.; Ke, Q.; Su, S.; Li, R.; Chen, Y.; Yoo, D.; Lee, E.; Jon, S.; Kang, P.M. Bilirubin Nanoparticles Protect Against Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e021212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wen, G.; Yao, L.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. Bilirubin ameliorates murine atherosclerosis through inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and reshaping the immune system. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. O’Brien, L.; Hosick, P.A.; John, K.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Biliverdin reductase isozymes in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 26, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gordon, D.M.; Adeosun, S.O.; Ngwudike, S.I.; Anderson, C.D.; Hall, J.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. CRISPR Cas9-mediated deletion of biliverdin reductase A (BVRA) in mouse liver cells induces oxidative stress and lipid accumulation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 672, 108072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Burns, K.A.; Hosick, P.A.; McBeth, L.; Nestor-Kalinoski, A.; Drummond, H.A.; AlAmodi, A.A.; Hankins, M.W.; Vanden Heuvel, J.P.; Stec, D.E. Biliverdin Reductase A Attenuates Hepatic Steatosis by Inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase (GSK) 3beta Phosphorylation of Serine 73 of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR) alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 25179–25191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E.; Tiribelli, C. Powering the powerhouse: Heme oxygenase-1 regulates mitochondrial function in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Acta Physiol. 2023, 237, e13931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adeosun, S.O.; Gordon, D.M.; Weeks, M.F.; Moore, K.H.; Hall, J.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. Loss of biliverdin reductase-A promotes lipid accumulation and lipotoxicity in mouse proximal tubule cells. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2018, 315, F323–F331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bates, E.A.; Kipp, Z.A.; Martinez, G.J.; Badmus, O.O.; Soundarapandian, M.M.; Foster, D.; Xu, M.; Creeden, J.F.; Greer, J.R.; Morris, A.J.; et al. Suppressing Hepatic UGT1A1 Increases Plasma Bilirubin, Lowers Plasma Urobilin, Reorganizes Kinase Signaling Pathways and Lipid Species and Improves Fatty Liver Disease. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sundararaghavan, V.L.; Sindhwani, P.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Glucuronidation and UGT isozymes in bladder: New targets for the treatment of uroepithelial carcinomas? Oncotarget 2017, 8, 3640–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Creeden, J.F.; Kipp, Z.A.; Xu, M.; Flight, R.M.; Moseley, H.N.B.; Martinez, G.J.; Lee, W.H.; Alganem, K.; Imami, A.S.; McMullen, M.R.; et al. Hepatic kinome atlas: An in-depth identification of kinase pathways in liver fibrosis of humans and rodents. Hepatology 2022, 76, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, W.H.; Najjar, S.M.; Kahn, C.R.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Hepatic insulin receptor: New views on the mechanisms of liver disease. Metabolism 2023, 145, 155607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jacobsen, C. Lysine residue 240 of human serum albumin is involved in high-affinity binding of bilirubin. Biochem. J. 1978, 171, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Reed, R.G.; Feldhoff, R.C.; Clute, O.L.; Peters, T., Jr. Fragments of bovine serum albumin produced by limited proteolysis. Conformation and ligand binding. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 4578–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Adeosun, S.O.; Moore, K.H.; Lang, D.M.; Nwaneri, A.C.; Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Stec, D.E. A Novel Fluorescence-Based Assay for the Measurement of Biliverdin Reductase Activity. React. Oxyg. Species 2018, 5, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Dennis, M.S.; Zhang, M.; Meng, Y.G.; Kadkhodayan, M.; Kirchhofer, D.; Combs, D.; Damico, L.A. Albumin binding as a general strategy for improving the pharmacokinetics of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35035–35043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Creeden, J.F.; Gordon, D.M.; Spegele, A.C.; Britton, S.L.; Koch, L.G.; Stec, D.E. Rats Genetically Selected for High Aerobic Exercise Capacity Have Elevated Plasma Bilirubin by Upregulation of Hepatic Biliverdin Reductase-A (BVRA) and Suppression of UGT1A1. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Flack, K.D.; Vitek, L.; Fry, C.S.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Cutting edge concepts: Does bilirubin enhance exercise performance? Front. Sports Act Living 2022, 4, 1040687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Thomas, D.T.; DelCimmuto, N.R.; Flack, K.D.; Stec, D.E.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Antioxidants as Immunomodulators in Exercise: Implications for Heme Oxygenase and Bilirubin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kipp, Z.A.; Xu, M.; Bates, E.A.; Lee, W.H.; Kern, P.A.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin Levels Are Negatively Correlated with Adiposity in Obese Men and Women, and Its Catabolized Product, Urobilin, Is Positively Associated with Insulin Resistance. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sundararaghavan, V.L.; Binepal, S.; Stec, D.E.; Sindhwani, P.; Hinds, T.D., Jr. Bilirubin, a new therapeutic for kidney transplant? Transplant. Rev. 2018, 32, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Bilirubin and urobilin interaction with albumin. (A) Bilirubin (green) in the binding pocket of human serum albumin. (B) Urobilin (blue) in the binding pocket of human serum albumin. The left half of the panels shows the 3D orientation, and the right half displays the 2D interaction plot. In the left panels, the yellow lines represent hydrogen bonds, and the purple lines indicate salt bridges.
Figure 2. Bilirubin and urobilin interaction with albumin. (A) Bilirubin (green) in the binding pocket of human serum albumin. (B) Urobilin (blue) in the binding pocket of human serum albumin. The left half of the panels shows the 3D orientation, and the right half displays the 2D interaction plot. In the left panels, the yellow lines represent hydrogen bonds, and the purple lines indicate salt bridges.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g002
Figure 3. Urobilin and bilirubin present autofluorescence when bound to albumin. (A) Bilirubin (50 μM) binding to albumin (50 μM) excitation spectra with emission at 520 nm. (B) Urobilin (50 μM) binding to albumin (50 μM) excitation spectra with emission at 520 nm. The area under the curve was determined and graphed. **** p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Urobilin and bilirubin present autofluorescence when bound to albumin. (A) Bilirubin (50 μM) binding to albumin (50 μM) excitation spectra with emission at 520 nm. (B) Urobilin (50 μM) binding to albumin (50 μM) excitation spectra with emission at 520 nm. The area under the curve was determined and graphed. **** p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g003
Figure 4. The fluorescent intensity of urobilin binding to albumin is concentration dependent. Binding assay with increasing concentrations of urobilin and albumin (50 μM) at excitation 490 nm. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 4. The fluorescent intensity of urobilin binding to albumin is concentration dependent. Binding assay with increasing concentrations of urobilin and albumin (50 μM) at excitation 490 nm. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g004
Figure 5. The combination of bilirubin and urobilin and autofluorescence. A competitive binding assay using different percentages of bilirubin and urobilin with albumin (50 μM). For bilirubin and urobilin, 100% = 50 μM, 75% = 37.5 μM, 50% = 25 μM, and 25% = 12.5 μM. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5. The combination of bilirubin and urobilin and autofluorescence. A competitive binding assay using different percentages of bilirubin and urobilin with albumin (50 μM). For bilirubin and urobilin, 100% = 50 μM, 75% = 37.5 μM, 50% = 25 μM, and 25% = 12.5 μM. Each point represents three independent replicates and is displayed as mean ± SEM.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g005
Figure 6. Urobilin is produced from the bioconversion of bilirubin and binds albumin for transport in circulation. Bilirubin is conjugated in the liver, transported to the intestines, and catabolized into urobilin. Urobilin can be reabsorbed into systemic circulation through the hepatic portal vein, which binds albumin for transport through the systemic circulation.
Figure 6. Urobilin is produced from the bioconversion of bilirubin and binds albumin for transport in circulation. Bilirubin is conjugated in the liver, transported to the intestines, and catabolized into urobilin. Urobilin can be reabsorbed into systemic circulation through the hepatic portal vein, which binds albumin for transport through the systemic circulation.
Biomedicines 13 00302 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, K.I.; Suryadevara, P.; Zhan, C.-G.; Hinds, T.D., Jr.; Kipp, Z.A. Urobilin Derived from Bilirubin Bioconversion Binds Albumin and May Interfere with Bilirubin Interacting with Albumin: Implications for Disease Pathology. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020302

AMA Style

Williams KI, Suryadevara P, Zhan C-G, Hinds TD Jr., Kipp ZA. Urobilin Derived from Bilirubin Bioconversion Binds Albumin and May Interfere with Bilirubin Interacting with Albumin: Implications for Disease Pathology. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2):302. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Kevin I., Priyanka Suryadevara, Chang-Guo Zhan, Terry D. Hinds, Jr., and Zachary A. Kipp. 2025. "Urobilin Derived from Bilirubin Bioconversion Binds Albumin and May Interfere with Bilirubin Interacting with Albumin: Implications for Disease Pathology" Biomedicines 13, no. 2: 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020302

APA Style

Williams, K. I., Suryadevara, P., Zhan, C.-G., Hinds, T. D., Jr., & Kipp, Z. A. (2025). Urobilin Derived from Bilirubin Bioconversion Binds Albumin and May Interfere with Bilirubin Interacting with Albumin: Implications for Disease Pathology. Biomedicines, 13(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop