Next Article in Journal
Quercetin-Based Nanocomposites as a Tool to Improve Dental Disease Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Antibiotics upon the Gut Microbiome: A Review of the Literature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines8110503
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Potential Use of Anti-Inflammatory Synthetic Heparan Sulfate to Attenuate Liver Damage

by
Katelyn Arnold
,
Yi-En Liao
and
Jian Liu
*
Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2020, 8(11), 503; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110503
Submission received: 2 November 2020 / Revised: 12 November 2020 / Accepted: 14 November 2020 / Published: 16 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Experimental and Translational Research on Liver Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heparan sulfate is a highly sulfated polysaccharide abundant on the surface of hepatocytes and surrounding extracellular matrix. Emerging evidence demonstrates that heparan sulfate plays an important role in neutralizing the activities of proinflammatory damage associate molecular patterns (DAMPs) that are released from hepatocytes under pathological conditions. Unlike proteins and nucleic acids, isolation of homogenous heparan sulfate polysaccharides from biological sources is not possible, adding difficulty to study the functional role of heparan sulfate. Recent advancement in the development of a chemoenzymatic approach allows production of a large number of structurally defined oligosaccharides. These oligosaccharides are used to probe the physiological functions of heparan sulfate in liver damage under different pathological conditions. The findings provide a potential new therapeutic agent to treat liver diseases that are associated with excessive inflammation.

1. Introduction

Heparan sulfate (HS) is an essential glycan for liver function. Present on the surface of endothelial cells and hepatocytes as well as in the surrounding extracellular matrix, HS participates in regulating blood coagulation, lipoprotein metabolism, cell proliferation, and inflammatory responses [1]. Compared to tools used to study DNA and proteins, the research tools for studying HS are underdeveloped. A multi-year glycoscience initiative from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has transformed the research in glycoscience, including HS-related research [2]. The program offers funding support for developing new tools for biologists to conduct glycan-related research topics. This article summarizes the recent development in understanding the roles of HS in liver functions. The primary focus of this article is on the recent progress from our research team on using structurally defined HS oligosaccharides to treat liver damage under sterile inflammation conditions.

2. Heparan Sulfate (HS) and HS Proteoglycans

HS is a member of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) family and is comprised of repeating disaccharide units that make up a long chain sulfated polysaccharide. HS is presented as part of proteoglycans of which HS chains are covalently bound to a core protein. HS proteoglycans decorate the cell surface and are present in extracellular matrix (ECM). Cell surface HS proteoglycans include syndecans and glypicans, and they serve as a physical barrier for cells (Figure 1). Syndecan-1 is the primary HS proteoglycan on the surface of hepatocytes. HS proteoglycans have multiple biological functions, including cell adhesion and migration, tissue differentiation, development, and metabolism [3]. It is widely accepted that the biological functions of HS proteoglycan are primarily attributed to its HS polysaccharide chains, whereas core proteins present the HS chain at the right locations and right time to interact with protein effectors. HS plays critical physiological roles as receptors or co-receptors for various proteins. For example, HS on hepatocytes binds to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TCL), such as apo-B and apo-E, to mediate their endocytosis and clearance [4]. Reducing N-sulfation on hepatocyte HS significantly increases accumulation of TCL even in the absence of LDL receptor, a main clearance receptor for TCL. Also, hepatic HS is found to regulate iron homeostasis by acting as a hepcidin receptor, a liver-derived peptide hormone responsible for iron export [5,6]. Exogenous highly sulfated HS, such as a mixture of ~17 saccharides with 2/6-O-sulfation, inhibits hepcidin expression [7].
Under pathological conditions, such as acute liver failure [8,9], membrane-bound HS is released into the ECM and the bloodstream, a process known as proteoglycan shedding. The shedding process occurs when the core protein part of HS proteoglycan is cleaved by proteases [10]. The shed proteoglycans can be further degraded by heparanase, an enzyme that digests long HS chains into small oligosaccharide fragments. These HS fragments are important mediators of inflammation [11], chemotaxis [12], coagulation [13], and infection [14,15] by interacting with signaling molecules (Figure 2). Circulating HS fragments are found to facilitate ECM reconstitution, attenuate inflammatory response by binding to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and neutralize damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as histones [16,17]. Heparin is a highly sulfated form of HS and is released by activated mast cells during inflammation and/or infection to increase vascular permeability. Heparin attenuates coagulation by interaction with antithrombin, thrombin, and factor Xa [13]. HS structures and sulfation patterns are different between normal and pathological conditions. For instance, more 3-O-sulfated and 6-O-desulfated HS are found in the liver with fibrogenic liver diseases and hepatocellular cancer [18]. However, the significance of the change in HS structure in relation to its function remain unknown. One key question for HS-related research is to identify which specific saccharide sequence relates to biological functions.

3. Biosynthesis and Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of HS

3.1. Biosynthesis of HS

In contrast to DNA, RNA, and proteins, HS synthesis is not a template-driven process. HS isolated from cells or tissues are a complex mixture of polysaccharides with different sulfation patterns and chain lengths due to the lack of control of the biosynthesis of HS [19]. HS biosynthesis involves multiple biosynthetic HS enzymes. The process can be categorized into linkage formation, polymerization, epimerization and sulfation [20] (Figure 3). First, xylosyltransferases (XylT) initiate the linkage formation by transferring a xylose residue from UDP-xylose (uridinediphospho xylose) to their attachment sites on core proteins. Usually, the attachment site is a serine residue next to glycine surrounded by several acidic amino acids [21]. Two galactose residues and one glucuronic acid residue are added after xylose by galactosyltransferases (GalT-I and GalT-II) and glucuronosyltransferase (GlcAT-I), forming a tetrasaccharide as an initial linkage for HS (Figure 3C1). Second, an N-acetylglucosamine is attached to the tetrasaccharide at the non-reducing end by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I and II (GlcNAcT-I and GlcNAcT-II) to begin the polymerization of HS chains. The chain is elongated by HS glucuronytransferase II and N-acteylglucurotransferase II (HSGlcAT-II and GlcNAcT-II) by adding repeating disaccharide units of glucuronic acid (GlcA) and glucosamine (GlcNAc). GlcA can be altered to iduronic acid (IdoA) by glucuronyl C5-epimerase (C5-epi). The GlcA residue in HS is present in 4C1-chair conformation, whereas the conformation of IdoA is more flexible, displaying both 1C4-chair conformation and 2S0-skew boat conformation (Figure 3C2). Therefore, the conversion of a GlcA residue to an IdoA residue renders the conformational flexibility to HS [22]. Lastly, HS chains can be diversified by sulfation at the 2-position of GlcA/IdoA and/or N-, 3-, 6- position of glucosamine by N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase (NDST), 2-/3-/6-O-sulfotransferases (2-OST, 3-OST, 6-OST). It should be noted that epimerization and sulfation are ordered processes; N-sulfation is required before epimerization reaction, and 2-O-sulfation occurs before 6-O-sulfation [23]. The substrate specificities of epimerase, 2-OST and 6-OST have limited the structural randomness in the final HS products.

3.2. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of HS

Chemical synthesis of structurally defined HS is difficult [24]. The availability of HS oligosaccharides has been a major limiting factor to advance HS-research. The understanding of the HS biosynthesis and the availability of the recombinant HS biosynthetic enzymes provide an alternative approach to synthesize HS oligosaccharides using the chemoenzymatic approach [25]. The method can diversify the structures of HS in many aspects, including HS length, degree, and pattern of sulfation. Compared to chemical synthesis, chemoenzymatic synthesis shortens the synthetic route and significantly improves the reaction efficiency. Chemoenzymatic synthesis readily generates oligosaccharides that are longer than hexasaccharide. Such capability is particularly important for biological studies as many HS-mediated biological processes require the size of HS fragment larger than six sugar residues (Table 1). Moreover, the variability of HS is further expanded by three 6-OST and seven 3-OST isoforms found in different mammalian tissues. Using these isoforms allows for the possibility of generating tissue-specific HS patterns [20,26]. The method has been licensed to Glycan Therapeutics, LLC to conduct customized reagent synthesis for biological studies. More than 100 different HS oligosaccharides have been synthesized using this method, and these oligosaccharides are commercially available from Glycan Therapeutics (www.glycantherapeutics.com).
The centerpiece in the chemoenzymatic synthesis is the use of recombinant HS biosynthetic enzymes, uridine diphosphate-monosaccharide donors and the sulfo donor for sulfotransferases (Figure 3C3). In order to carry out milligram to gram scale synthesis for biological studies, a large quantity of enzymes and the cofactors, including uridinedisphospho glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA), uridinediphospho N-trifluoroacetyl glucosamine (UDP-GlcNTFA) and 3’-Phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS), is necessary [42]. The expansion of enzyme and cofactor production has led to generation of oligosaccharides with well documented biological activity in animal models [8,43]. Heptasaccharides obtained from this method have been used for crystallogical studies and reveal the complex interaction with 3-OST and 2-OST, indicating that HS with the desired specific structure is available to elucidate sequence specificity between HS and proteins [44,45].
The availability of structurally defined oligosaccharides propels the development of HS microarray technology, a technique that is capable of screening for binding of a protein to different HS oligosaccharides in a high throughput fashion (Table 1). For example, the HS-fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-FGF receptor (FGFR) complex formation and HS binding specificity of FGF1 and FGF2 are further elucidated with chemoenzymatically synthesized HS [32,46]. Moreover, critical pro-inflammatory cytokine and regulator, IL-12 and Wnt are found to bind to HS that has a minimum of octasaccharide domain containing 3-O and 6-O sulfation, respectively [34,39]. A critical receptor for heparin/LMWH clearance in the liver, stabilin-2, is also shown to have significantly higher affinity to 3-O-sulfated HS by applying the customized HS [47]. In summary, the power of chemoenzymatically synthesized HS clearly advances our understanding of the structure–activity and structure–function relationships between HS and their ligands.

4. The Potentials for HS-Based Therapeutics

4.1. Heparin

Heparin and HS have key structural and functional differences. Heparin is comprised of more IdoA and higher contents of sulfated GlcN. HS contains 0.6 sulfo groups per disaccharide repeating unit with 80% of the disaccharides have a GlcA residue and only 20% of the disaccharides have an IdoA residue [42]. In comparison, heparin contains about 2.6 sulfo groups per disaccharide with 90% the disaccharides from heparin have an IdoA residue and only 10% of the disaccharide from heparin have a GlcA residue [42]. Heparin also carries a higher degree of 3-O-sulfation than HS. These structural differences contribute to heparin’s high anticoagulant activity compared to HS. Furthermore, heparin is an exclusive product from the secretory vesicles in mast cells, whereas HS is found on many cell types, including endothelial cells and hepatocytes.

4.2. Anticoagulation

Heparin is a commonly used anticoagulant drug in the clinic. Three forms of heparin-based therapeutics, including unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and fondaparinux, are currently available on the market. The anticoagulant activity of heparin is determined by interaction with antithrombin and thrombin. Binding to antithrombin (AT) depends on a specific pentasaccharide sequence, including a critical 3-O sulfated GlcN, and induces a conformational change in AT. This promotes the formation AT-factor Xa complex thereby inhibiting the downstream coagulation cascade. Also, heparin chains that are longer than 18 saccharides can simultaneously bind to AT and thrombin, forming an inactivated AT-thrombin complex. Only those saccharide chains longer than 18 residues display the anti-factor IIa (or anti-thrombin) activity [48]. LMWH displays high anti-factor Xa activity but low anti-IIa activity because majority of the chains in LMWH are shorter than 18 residues. Fondaparinux only contains the essential pentasaccharide for the binding to AT and is prepared from chemical synthesis. While there are pros and cons for each compound in terms of cost, source, protamine-reversibility, and renal safety, LMWH is increasingly used for venous thrombosis prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis in the US and Europe [49].
There are concerns over the reliability and safety of animal-sourced heparin [50]. Unfractionated heparin is isolated from pig intestine through a long and poorly regulated supply chain. LMWH is a depolymerized unfractionated heparin. Therefore, both unfractionated heparin and LWMH are animal-sourced products. A cost-effective method to prepare a heparin substitute using a fully synthetic method will be certainly advantageous. The chemoenzymatic approach is currently the most effective approach to prepare synthetic LMWH. In addition, synthetic LMWH has pharmacological advantages over animal sourced heparin. For example, the anticoagulant activity of synthetic LMWH is fully reversible by protamine, potentially reducing the bleeding side effect associated with currently animal-sourced LMWH [43].

4.3. Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Injury

The availability of structurally defined HS oligosaccharides has opened the opportunity to examine potential therapeutic effects in liver disease. The first murine model was acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury. Results from our studies suggest that an 18-mer oligosaccharide is hepatoprotective by neutralizing the proinflammatory activity of high mobility box 1 (HMGB1) [8].
HMGB1, originally called p30 and amphoterin, was first isolated from rat brain using heparin-Sepharose column in 1987 [51]. A few years later, it was discovered that HMGB1 was a ligand for syndecans. The binding between syndecans and HMGB1 was attributed to HS chain [52]. The amino acids in HMGB1 responsible for binding to HS are in the long loop region that connects the A and B boxes. Mutagenesis studies confirmed that Lys-87, Lys-88, Lys-96, Lys-97, and Lys-150 contribute the most to HS binding to HMGB1 [53].
HMGB1 is readily expressed by hepatocytes, more so than other cells types, and therefore has become a subject of interest in many inflammatory liver diseases [54]. Sterile inflammatory liver diseases include alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, drug-induced liver injury, and ischemia/reperfusion injury during transplantation and liver surgeries [55,56]. HMGB1 expression and translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in human liver tissue from alcohol steatohepatitis patients was increased compared to healthy controls and correlated to disease severity [57]. Using a transgenic mouse with HMGB1 knocked down mainly in hepatocytes, this study also demonstrated that lack of HMGB1 protects from alcoholic fatty liver diseases. The authors attribute this protection to an increase in proteins involved in fatty β-oxidation and a decrease in fatty acid synthase. HMGB1 was also increased in the plasma in a mouse model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) induced by high fat diet and use of HMGB1-neutralizing antibody improved liver inflammation although there was no improvement on liver lipid accumulation [58].
Drug induced liver injury caused by acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in many parts of the world [55]. APAP-induced ALF is the best characterized model for HMGB1 dependent injury in patients and animal models. It was the first experimental model system used to show that HMGB1-neutralizing antibody improves the liver condition [54,56]. In an elegant study by Huebener and colleagues, they demonstrate that HMGB1 is necessary for neutrophil migration under sterile inflammation conditions [59]. In vitro, neutrophils significantly migrated towards liver lysate prepared from wild type mice, but not toward liver lyase in which HMGB1 was deleted in hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells. In vivo, injection of liver lyase containing HMGB1 to the peritoneal cavity induced significant neutrophil migration to the peritoneum. In contrast, injection of HMGB1-depleted liver lyase reduced neutrophil infiltration. Consistent with these results, a reduction in hepatic neutrophil infiltration after APAP overdose in vivo was observed in mice with HMGB1-deficient hepatocytes without altering hepatic macrophages. Importantly, this study demonstrated that the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), not toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), is necessary for inflammation after APAP overdose by using TLR4 and RAGE deficient mice.
We discovered an HS oligosaccharide that inhibits the proinflammatory activity of HMGB1 and attenuate liver damage. HS octadecasaccharide (comp1, 18-mer HP, Table 2) protects from ALF caused by APAP overdose [8]. The 18-mer HP was synthesized through the chemoenzymatic approach. The compound contains 18 saccharide residues with a disaccharide repeating unit of -GlcNS-IdoA2S- (Table 2). In this study, we demonstrated that 18-mer-HP’s protective effect is attributed to inhibiting function of HMGB1/RAGE axis and attenuates neutrophil infiltration in the liver (Figure 4). Three lines of evidence supported this conclusion. First, we showed that 18-mer-HP decreased HMGB1-mediated neutrophil infiltration in an air pouch model. Here, we demonstrate that injection of purified recombinant HMGB1 elicits neutrophils into the air pouch while co-injection of 18-mer-HP and HMGB1 reduces the neutrophil infiltration. Second, administration of both 18-mer-HP and HMGB1 neutralizing antibody offered very similar hepatoprotection after APAP overdose. In this experiment, we compared the extent of the hepatoprotection effect from HMGB-neutralizing antibody, 18-mer-HP alone and the combination of 18-mer-HP and HMGB1 antibody in the APAP model. Our findings showed that all three treatments gave the same level of protection, suggesting that both the antibody and 18-mer-HP target to HMGB1. Third, we discovered that 18-mer-HP does not have protective effect in RAGE deficient mice after APAP overdose, suggesting that 18-mer HP is engaged in RAGE/HMGB1 axis to display its hepatoprotection. In a mortality study using a lethal dose of APAP, 18-mer-HP treatment increased the survival rate from 53% to 90%.
Three additional HS oligosaccharides were employed to investigate the contribution of the sulfation patterns and the size of oligosaccharides. These oligosaccharides include comp 4 (6-mer), comp 3 (12-mer), and comp 2 (18-mer AXa). 6-mer and 12-mer have the identical disaccharide repeating structure as 18-mer-HP, but shorter overall size. 18-mer AXa has the same size as 18-mer-HP, but has a higher number of sulfo groups and it has the anticoagulant activity as measured by anti-Factor Xa assay. Neither 6- or 12-mer were able to bind to HMGB1, or decrease liver injury in vivo, suggesting that the size of the oligosaccharide is essential for hepatoprotection. Administration of 18-mer-AXa, although it appears to bind to HMGB1 with higher affinity to 18-mer-HP, does not protect from liver injury. Further studies revealed that the anticoagulant activity from 18-mer AXa reduces fibrin formation, a necessary molecule for liver regeneration after injury. Taken together, the results from the studies uncover a new class of carbohydrates to protect acute liver injury from APAP overdose by targeting to HMGB1.
In addition to 18-mer-HP, endogenous syndecan-1 potentially contributes to the hepatoprotection after APAP overdose. A recent report demonstrated that Syndecan-1-/- mice were highly sensitive to liver damage caused by APAP toxicity [61]. The authors also demonstrated that purified syndecan-1 and HS polysaccharide, but not the core protein of syndecan-1, rendered protection in Syndecan-1-/- mice after APAP overdose. Furthermore, they reported that syndecan-1 also displayed protection in APAP overdose wild type mice [61]. The biochemical analysis from our studies revealed that syndecan-1 binds to HMGB1 through its HS side chain. Furthermore, syndecan-1 shedding was readily detected in plasma from both APAP mice and APAP overdose patients [8]. When syndecan-1 is shed from hepatocytes, soluble syndecan-1 may attenuate sterile inflammation by displacing extracellular HMGB1 from the injury sites and/or interacting with circulating HMGB1 (Figure 4). During extensive liver damage, it is likely that shed syndecan-1 is inadequate to neutralize all HMGB1, and the addition of 18-mer-HP, a mimetic of HS on syndecan-1, provides further protection. One plausible hypothesis is that the 18-mer-HP potentiates the host anti-inflammatory effect mediated by syndecan-1.

4.4. HS Protects against Liver Damage by Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

HS oligosaccharides also display protection against liver damage caused by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Unlike the case in the APAP model, both anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory activities from a HS oligosaccharide are essential for the protection in liver I/R mouse model. Thrombosis and inflammation are traditionally viewed as separate processes that complement each other, but growing evidence supports the relationship between thrombosis and inflammation stimulating and reinforcing one another especially in sepsis, I/R injury, trauma, and severe burns [62]. Tissue factor lies beneath the endothelium and is exposed during vessel wall injury, where it can serve as a potent activator of coagulation by generating thrombin [62]. Thrombin’s coagulation role entails activation of platelets to a procoagulant state and fibrin generation, while its inflammatory role entails cleavage of C5 in the complement cascade and activation of endothelial cells. Platelets and neutrophils represent the predominant cell types in thromboinflammation [62]. Platelets and neutrophils form heterotypic aggregates on activated endothelial cells, leading to occlusion of the vessel. In addition, activated platelets can also secrete HMGB1 even though they lack a nucleus [63]. Platelets also express HMGB1 receptors, RAGE, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9, on their surface, suggesting that HMGB1 can stimulate both platelet and neutrophil activation, further propagating thromboinflammation. In liver I/R conditions, hypoxic hepatocytes release HMGB1 [64]. HMGB1 has been shown to recruit neutrophils through RAGE activation after liver I/R injury [59]. Additionally, activation of the complement cascade, specifically thrombin cleavage of completement proteins C3a and C5a, also results in neutrophil recruitment after liver I/R injury. It has been shown that depletion of serum complement before liver ischemia prevents neutrophil accumulation during reperfusion [65]. Once neutrophils infiltrate into the liver, they cause hepatocyte death by releasing protease including elastases, MMP-9, cathepsin G, proteinase-3, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) [66].
We demonstrate that an oligosaccharide with anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory activities protects from liver injury after I/R [60]. Using four 12-mers as well as a 6-mer with different sulfation patterns (comp 3 and comp 5–8, Table 2), we assayed for HMGB1 binding. Two highly sulfated 12-mers (comp 6, 12-mer-NS2S6S and comp 7, 12-mer-AXa, Table 2) bind to HMGB1, suggesting that they possess the anti-inflammatory activity. However, 12-mer-AXa (comp 7) has anticoagulant activity and 12-mer-NS2S6S (comp 6) does not. Both 12-mers were tested in liver I/R injury model. Interestingly, only 12-mer-AXa (comp 7) significantly protects from the injury as determined by plasma concentration of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), percentage of necrotic cells, neutrophil infiltration, and MPO activity in the ischemic liver lobe. We attribute this hepatoprotective effect to 12-mer-AXa’s (comp 7) dual activities of anticoagulation and anti-inflammation as both processes are essential in the pathology of liver I/R injury. To support the hypothesis, we tested a combined treatment of 12-mer-NS2S6S (comp 6) which has anti-inflammation activity but no anticoagulation activity, and comp 8 (6-mer-AXa, Table 2) that has anticoagulation activity but no anti-inflammation effect. As expected, the treatment with the combined oligosaccharides displays protection. The results suggest that both anticoagulation and anti-inflammation are required to protect from I/R liver injury. This can be achieved using a single oligosaccharide, i.e., 12-mer-AXa (comp 7), or a combination of two compounds 12-mer-NS2S6S (comp 6) carrying anti-inflammatory activity and 6-mer-AXa (comp 8) carrying anticoagulant activity.

4.5. Other Promising Disease Models for Therapeutic HS

In addition to APAP overdose and I/R injury, heparin/HS are also found to reduce inflammation by lowering pro-inflammatory cytokines and maintaining ECM in CCL4-induced liver fibrosis [67], doxorubicin-induced liver damage [68], and primary graft dysfunction in liver transplantation [69]. Moreover, heparin/HS also have additional therapeutic potential for its antitumor, antivirus, and anti-hepcidin effects; reviews on these topics can be found elsewhere [70,71,72,73]. Briefly, heparin prevents tumor metastasis possibly by reducing adhesion, proliferation, and migration of cancer cells by targeting adhesion molecules (P-selectin, VCAM-1) or chemokines (CXCL12) in preclinical studies [71]. However, the existing data in clinical trials does not support the antimetastatic effect of heparin [74]. Regarding to the antivirus effects, it is shown that heparin/HS can bind to the viral spike proteins to block viral entry and resulting infection, such as herpes simplex virus [75] and hepatitis C virus [76]. Recently, HS proteoglycan is also found to bind to spike proteins of SARS-CoV in vitro [77], which may contribute to beneficial effect of heparin in COVID-19 patients reported [78]. Heparin is shown as a potent inhibitor of hepcidin in hepatic cell model, suggesting its potential therapeutic effects in anemia by restoring iron distribution [79]. In summary, while antitumor, antivirus, and anti-hepcidin effects may also be independent of anticoagulation properties of heparin, structurally defined HS libraries will help to decipher the various roles of HS.

5. Conclusions

This review summarizes the recent progress on using HS to reduce liver damage by targeting to HMGB1-mediated sterile inflammation. As a widely used anticoagulant, heparin and its derivatives display a range of therapeutic potentials [80]. Structurally heterogeneous heparin polysaccharides are protective in the APAP overdose model [61,81], but the underlying mechanism has been unclear. The access of structurally homogeneous oligosaccharides enables identification of candidate targets underlying the therapeutic effects. We demonstrate the uses of both anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant oligosaccharides to probe against liver damage in both APAP-overdose and I/R injury models. Effectiveness in the APAP-overdose model requires an oligosaccharide with anti-inflammatory activity and a lack of anticoagulant activity, while effectiveness in the liver I/R model requires both activities. Structurally defined HS oligosaccharides have been perceived as expensive to obtain. The chemoenzymatic synthesis approach has significantly lowered the barrier to access HS oligosaccharides under the support from NIH. The HS-based oligosaccharides will add a new chemical space as therapeutic agents to treat liver diseases.

Funding

This work is supported in part by NIH grants (HL094463 and HL144970) and Glycan Innovation grants from Eshelman Innovation Institute. Yi-En Liao is a recipient of predoctoral fellowship from the Government Scholarship to Study Abroad (GSSA) from Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

J.L. is a founder and chief scientific officer for Glycan Therapeutics. The Liu lab at UNC has received a gift from Glycan Therapeutics to support research in glycoscience. Other authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Bishop, J.; Schuksz, M.; Esko, J.D. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans fine-tune mammalian physiology. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 446, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. National Research Council Glycoscience: A Roadmap for the Future; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  3. Esko, J.D.; Prestegard, J.H.; Linhardt, R.J. Proteins That Bind Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. MacArthur, J.M.; Bishop, J.R.; Stanford, K.I.; Wang, L.; Bensadoun, A.; Witztum, J.L.; Esko, J.D. Liver heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins independently of LDL receptor family members. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Poli, M.; Anower, E.K.F.; Asperti, M.; Ruzzenenti, P.; Gryzik, M.; Denardo, A.; Gordts, P.; Arosio, P.; Esko, J.D. Hepatic heparan sulfate is a master regulator of hepcidin expression and iron homeostasis in human hepatocytes and mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 13292–13303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Poli, M.; Asperti, M.; Ruzzenenti, P.; Mandelli, L.; Campostrini, N.; Martini, G.; Di Somma, M.; Maccarinelli, F.; Girelli, D.; Naggi, A.; et al. Oversulfated heparins with low anticoagulant activity are strong and fast inhibitors of hepcidin expression in vitro and in vivo. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 92, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Asperti, M.; Naggi, A.; Esposito, E.; Ruzzenenti, P.; Di Somma, M.; Gryzik, M.; Arosio, P.; Poli, M. High Sulfation and a High Molecular Weight Are Important for Anti-hepcidin Activity of Heparin. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 6, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Arnold, K.; Xu, Y.; Sparkenbaugh, E.M.; Li, M.; Han, X.; Zhang, X.; Xia, K.; Piegore, M.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; et al. Design of anti-inflammatory heparan sulfate to protect against acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaav8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van Golen, R.F.; Reiniers, M.J.; Vrisekoop, N.; Zuurbier, C.J.; Olthof, P.B.; van Rheenen, J.; van Gulik, T.M.; Parsons, B.J.; Heger, M. The mechanisms and physiological relevance of glycocalyx degradation in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 21, 1098–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nam, E.J.; Park, P.W. Shedding of cell membrane-bound proteoglycans. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 836, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Collins, L.E.; Troeberg, L. Heparan sulfate as a regulator of inflammation and immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Crijns, H.; Vanheule, V.; Proost, P. Targeting Chemokine-Glycosaminoglycan Interactions to Inhibit Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oduah, E.I.; Linhardt, R.J.; Sharfstein, S.T. Heparin: Past, Present, and Future. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aquino, R.S.; Hayashida, A.; Park, P.W. Host syndecan-1 promotes listeriosis by inhibiting intravascular neutrophil extracellular traps. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hayashida, K.; Chen, Y.; Bartlett, A.H.; Park, P.W. Syndecan-1 is an in vivo suppressor of Gram-positive toxic shock. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 19895–19903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yang, Y.; Haeger, S.M.; Suflita, M.A.; Zhang, F.; Dailey, K.L.; Colbert, J.F.; Ford, J.A.; Picon, M.A.; Stearman, R.S.; Lin, L.; et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling Mediates Pulmonary Endothelial Glycocalyx Reconstitution. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 56, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Haeger, S.M.; Yang, Y.; Dailey, K.L.; Ford, J.A.; Schmidt, E.P. Circulating Heparan Sulfate Fragments Attenuate Histone-Induced Lung Injury Independently of Histone Binding. Shock 2017, 48, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tatrai, P.; Egedi, K.; Somoracz, A.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Ten Dam, G.; Lyon, M.; Deakin, J.A.; Kiss, A.; Schaff, Z.; Kovalszky, I. Quantitative and qualitative alterations of heparan sulfate in fibrogenic liver diseases and hepatocellular cancer. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2010, 58, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Prestegard, J.H.; Liu, J.; Widmalm, G. Oligosaccharides and Polysaccharides. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kreuger, J.; Kjellen, L. Heparan sulfate biosynthesis: Regulation and variability. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Esko, J.D.; Zhang, L. Influence of core protein sequence on glycosaminoglycan assembly. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 10, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Casu, B.; Petitou, M.; Provasoli, M.; Sinay, P. Conformational flexibility: A new concept for explaining binding and biological properties of iduronic acid-containing glycosaminoglycans. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1988, 13, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lindahl, U.; Couchman, J.; Kimata, K.; Esko, J.D. Proteoglycans and Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mende, M.; Bednarek, C.; Wawryszyn, M.; Sauter, P.; Biskup, M.; Schepers, U.; Brase, S. Chemical synthesis of glycosaminoglycans. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 8193–8255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Lin, L.; Huang, H.; Linhardt, R.J. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Glycosaminoglycans. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Thacker, B.E.; Xu, D.; Lawrence, R.; Esko, J.D. Heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfation: A rare modification in search of a function. Matrix Biol. 2014, 35, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Atha, D.H.; Lormeau, J.-C.; Petitou, M.; Rosenberg, R.D.; Choay, J. Contribution of monosaccharide residues in heparin binding to antithrombin III. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 6723–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lindahl, U.; Backstrom, G.; Thunberg, L.; Leder, I.G. Evidence for a 3-O-sulfated D-glucosamine residue in the antithrombin-binding sequence of heparin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 6551–6555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Petitou, M.; Herault, L.-P.; Bernat, A.; Driguez, P.-A.; Duchaussoy, P.; Lormeau, J.-C.; Herbert, J.-M. Synthesis of thrombin-inhibiting heparin mimetics without side effects. Nature 1999, 398, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; Beenken, A.; Eliseenkova, A.V.; Mohammadi, M.; Linhardt, R.J. Compositional analysis of heparin/heparan sulfate interacting with fibroblast growth factor.fibroblast growth factor receptor complexes. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 8379–8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Guglieri, S.; Hricovini, M.; Raman, R.; Polito, L.; Torri, G.; Casu, B.; Sasisekharan, R.; Guerrini, M. Minimum FGF2 binding structural requirements of heparin and heparan sulfate oligosaccharides as determined by NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 13862–13869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schultz, V.; Suflita, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y.; Li, L.; Green, D.E.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, F.; DeAngelis, P.L.; et al. Heparan Sulfate Domains Required for Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 and 2 Signaling through Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1c. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 2495–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Guerrini, M.; Agulles, T.; Bisio, A.; Hricovini, M.; Lay, L.; Naggi, A.; Poletti, L.; Sturiale, L.; Torri, G.; Casu, B. Minimal heparin/heparan sulfate sequences for binding to fibroblast growth factor-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 292, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, W.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Ho, M. Epitope mapping by a Wnt-blocking antibody: Evidence of the Wnt binding domain in heparan sulfate. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lau, E.K.; Paavola, C.D.; Johnson, Z.; Gaudry, J.-P.; Geretti, E.; Borlat, F.; Kungl, A.J.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Handel, T.M. Identification of the glycosaminoglycan binding site of the CC chemokine, MCP-1 implications for structure and function in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 22294–22305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Miller, R.L.; Dykstra, A.B.; Wei, W.; Holsclaw, C.; Turnbull, J.E.; Leary, J.A. Enrichment of two isomeric heparin oligosaccharides exhibiting different affinities toward monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 11551–11558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Joseph, P.R.B.; Sawant, K.V.; Rajarathnam, K. Heparin-bound chemokine CXCL8 monomer and dimer are impaired for CXCR1 and CXCR2 activation: Implications for gradients and neutrophil trafficking. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Joseph, P.R.B.; Mosier, P.D.; Desai, U.R.; Rajarathnam, K. Solution NMR characterization of chemokine CXCL8/IL-8 monomer and dimer binding to glycosaminoglycans: Structural plasticity mediates differential binding interactions. Biochem. J. 2015, 472, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nguyen, K.G.; Gillam, F.B.; Hopkins, J.J.; Jayanthi, S.; Gundampati, R.K.; Su, G.; Bear, J.; Pilkington, G.R.; Jalah, R.; Felber, B.K.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of heparin-induced modulation of human interleukin 12 bioactivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 4412–4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Thacker, B.E.; Seamen, E.; Lawrence, R.; Parker, M.W.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Vander, K.C.W.; Esko, J.D. Expanding the 3-O-Sulfate Proteome--Enhanced Binding of Neuropilin-1 to 3-O-Sulfated Heparan Sulfate Modulates Its Activity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Song, X.; Xiao, Y.; Su, G.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Eliezer, D.; et al. 3-O-sulfation of heparan sulfate enhances tau interaction and cellular uptake. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2–11. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, J.; Linhardt, R.J. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of heparan sulfate and heparin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1676–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Xu, Y.; Chandarajoti, K.; Zhang, X.; Pagadala, V.; Dou, W.; Hoppensteadt, D.M.; Sparkenbaugh, E.; Cooley, B.; Daily, S.; Key, N.S.; et al. Synthetic oligosaccharides can replace animal-sourced low-molecular weight heparins. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaan5954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Xu, Y.; Moon, A.F.; Xu, S.; Krahn, J.M.; Liu, J.; Pedersen, L.C. Structure Based Substrate Specificity Analysis of Heparan Sulfate 6-O-Sulfotransferases. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, Z.; Hsieh, P.H.; Xu, Y.; Thieker, D.; Chai, E.J.E.; Xie, S.; Cooley, B.; Woods, R.J.; Chi, L.; Liu, J. Synthesis of 3-O-Sulfated Oligosaccharides to Understand the Relationship between Structures and Functions of Heparan Sulfate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5249–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sterner, E.; Masuko, S.; Li, G.; Li, L.; Green, D.E.; Otto, N.J.; Xu, Y.; DeAngelis, P.L.; Liu, J.; Dordick, J.S.; et al. Fibroblast growth factor-based signaling through synthetic heparan sulfate blocks copolymers studied using high cell density three-dimensional cell printing. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 9754–9765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Pempe, E.H.; Xu, Y.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Liu, J.; Harris, E.N. Probing structural selectivity of synthetic heparin binding to Stabilin protein receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 20774–20783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Danielsson, A.; Raub, E.; Lindahl, U.; Bjork, I. Role of ternary complexes, in which heparin binds both antithrombin and proteinase, in the acceleration of the reactions between antithrombin and thrombin or factor Xa. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 15467–15473. [Google Scholar]
  49. Blann, A.D.; Khoo, C.W. The prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism with LMWHs and new anticoagulants. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2009, 5, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Linhardt, R.J. Lessons learned from the contamination of heparin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rauvala, H.; Pihlaskari, R. Isolation and some characteristics of an adhesive factor of brain that enhances neurite outgrowth in central neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 16625–16635. [Google Scholar]
  52. Salmivirta, M.; Rauvala, H.; Elenius, K.; Jalkanen, M. Neurite growth-promoting protein (amphoterin, p30) binds syndecan. Exp. Cell Res. 1992, 200, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, D.; Young, J.; Song, D.; Esko, J.D. Heparan sulfate is essential for high mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) signaling by the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41736–41744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Andersson, U.; Yang, H.; Harris, H.E. Extracellular HMGB1 as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2018, 22, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bernal, W.; Wendon, J. Acute liver failure. N. Eng. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2525–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kubes, P.; Mehal, W.Z. Sterile inflammation in the liver. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 1158–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ge, X.; Antoine, D.J.; Lu, Y.; Arriazu, E.; Leung, T.-M.; Klepper, A.L.; Branch, A.D.; Fiel, M.I.; Nieto, N. High mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) participates in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD). J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22672–22691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Chen, X.; Ling, Y.; Wei, Y.; Tang, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, F.; Li, H.; Wang, R.; Wen, W.; et al. Dual regulation of HMGB1 by combined JNK1/2-ATF2 axis with miR-200 family in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. FASEB J. 2017, 32, 2722–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Huebener, P.; Pradere, J.P.; Hernandez, C.; Gwak, G.Y.; Caviglia, J.M.; Mu, X.; Loike, J.D.; Jenkins, R.E.; Antoine, D.J.; Schwabe, R.F. The HMGB1/RAGE axis triggers neutrophil-mediated injury amplification following necrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Arnold, K.; Xu, Y.; Liao, Y.-E.; Cooley, B.C.; Pawlinski, R.; Liu, J. Synthetic anticoagulant heparan sulfate attenuates liver ischemia reperfusion injury. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nam, E.J.; Hayashida, K.; Aquino, R.S.; Couchman, J.R.; Kozar, R.A.; Liu, J.; Park, P.W. Syndecan-1 Limits the Progression of Liver Injury and Promotes Liver Repair in Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury. Hepatology 2017, 66, 1601–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jackson, S.P.; Darbousset, R.; Schoenwaelder, S.M. Thromboinflammation: Challenges of therapeutically targeting coagulation and other host defense mechanisms. Blood 2019, 133, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Vogel, S.; Bodenstein, R.; Chen, Q.; Feil, S.; Feil, R.; Rheinlaender, J.; Schäffer, T.E.; Bohn, E.; Frick, J.-S.; Borst, O.; et al. Platelet-derived HMGB1 is a critical mediator of thrombosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 4638–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tsung, A.; Klune, J.R.; Zhang, X.; Jeyabalan, G.; Cao, Z.; Peng, X.; Stolz, D.B.; Geller, D.A.; Rosengart, M.R.; Billiar, T.R. HMGB1 release induced by liver ischemia involves Toll-like receptor 4 dependent reactive oxygen species production and calcium-mediated signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2913–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jaeschke, H.; Farhood, A.; Bautista, A.P.; Spolarics, Z.; Spitzer, J.J. Complement activates Kupffer cells and neutrophils during reperfusion after hepatic ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 264, G801–G809. [Google Scholar]
  66. Oliveira, T.H.C.; Marques, P.E.; Proost, P.; Teixeira, M.M.M. Neutrophils: A cornerstone of liver ischemia and reperfusion injury. Lab. Investig. 2018, 98, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Yan, Y.; Guan, C.; Du, S.; Zhu, W.; Ji, Y.; Su, N.; Mei, X.; He, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Effects of Enzymatically Depolymerized Low Molecular Weight Heparins on CCl4-Induced Liver Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Deepa, P.R.; Varalakshmi, P. Biochemical evaluation of the inflammatory changes in cardiac, hepatic and renal tissues of adriamycin-administered rats and the modulatory role of exogenous heparin-derivative treatment. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2005, 156, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, X.; Gou, C.; Pang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wen, T. Extracellular histones are clinically associated with primary graft dysfunction in human liver transplantation. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 10264–10271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Liu, J.; Li, J.; Arnold, K.; Pawlinski, R.; Key, N. Using heparin molecules to manage COVID-19. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haem. 2020, 4, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ma, S.N.; Mao, Z.X.; Wu, Y.; Liang, M.X.; Wang, D.D.; Chen, X.; Chang, P.A.; Zhang, W.; Tang, J.H. The anti-cancer properties of heparin and its derivatives: A review and prospect. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2020, 14, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mousa, S.A.; Petersen, L.J. Anti-cancer properties of low-molecular-weight heparin: Preclinical evidence. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 102, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Poli, M.; Asperti, M.; Ruzzenenti, P.; Naggi, A.; Arosio, P. Non-Anticoagulant Heparins Are Hepcidin Antagonists for the Treatment of Anemia. Molecules 2017, 22, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montroy, J.; Lalu, M.M.; Auer, R.C.; Grigor, E.; Mazzarello, S.; Carrier, M.; Kimmelman, J.; Fergusson, D.A. The Efficacy and Safety of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Administration to Improve Survival of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 120, 832–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Copeland, R.J.; Balasubramaniam, A.; Tiwari, V.; Zhang, F.; Bridges, A.; Linhardt, R.J.; Shukla, D.; Liu, J. Using a 3-O-sulfated heparin octasaccharide to inhibit the entry of herpes simplex virus 1. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 5774–5783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Basu, A.; Kanda, T.; Beyene, A.; Saito, K.; Meyer, K.; Ray, R. Sulfated homologues of heparin inhibit hepatitis C virus entry into mammalian cells. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 3933–3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Mycroft-West, C.; Su, D.; Elli, S.; Guimond, S.; Miller, G.J.; Turnbull, J.; Yates, E.A.; Guerrini, M.; Ferning, D.; Lima, M.A.; et al. The 2019 coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) surface protein (Spike) S1 receptor binding domain undergoes conformational change upon heparin binding. BioRix 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shi, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Cai, F.; Zeng, F.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Deng, B.; et al. Clinical observations of low molecular weight heparin in relieving inflammation in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Poli, M.; Girelli, D.; Campostrini, N.; Maccarinelli, F.; Finazzi, D.; Luscieti, S.; Nai, A.; Arosio, P. Heparin: A potent inhibitor of hepcidin expression in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2011, 117, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shriver, Z.; Raguram, S.; Sasisekharan, R. Glycomics: A pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wen, Z.; Lei, Z.; Yao, L.; Jiang, P.; Gu, T.; Ren, F.; Liu, Y.; Gou, C.; Li, X.; Wen, T. Circulating histones are major mediators of systemic inflammation and cellula injury in patients with acute liver failure. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 08 00503 g001 550
Figure 1. Endogenous heparan sulfate (HS) on the cell surface in a healthy state. (A) Membrane-bound HS is usually attached to core protein in the form of HS proteoglycan (HSPG), such as syndecans or glypican. HS is comprised of repeating disaccharides of glucuronic acid (GlcA)-glucosamine (GlcN) and iduronic acid (IdoA)-GlcN in various sulfation pattern as indicated. (B) Membrane-bound HS acts as a co-receptor for various ligands, for example, BMP6. In hepatocytes, HS mediates hepcidin expression by modulating BMP6/BMP binding. (C) Membrane-bound HS acts as a receptor to facilitate lipid clearance, for example, vLDL in the liver.
Figure 1. Endogenous heparan sulfate (HS) on the cell surface in a healthy state. (A) Membrane-bound HS is usually attached to core protein in the form of HS proteoglycan (HSPG), such as syndecans or glypican. HS is comprised of repeating disaccharides of glucuronic acid (GlcA)-glucosamine (GlcN) and iduronic acid (IdoA)-GlcN in various sulfation pattern as indicated. (B) Membrane-bound HS acts as a co-receptor for various ligands, for example, BMP6. In hepatocytes, HS mediates hepcidin expression by modulating BMP6/BMP binding. (C) Membrane-bound HS acts as a receptor to facilitate lipid clearance, for example, vLDL in the liver.
Biomedicines 08 00503 g001
Biomedicines 08 00503 g002 550
Figure 2. Endogenous HS on the cell surface in a disease state. (A) Membrane-bound HS can bind to adhesion molecules on neutrophils, supporting their attachment and rolling on the cell surface. (B) Shed HS fragments can bind to damage associate molecular patterns (DAMPs) (for example, histones and HMGB1 release by neutrophils) during inflammation, neutralize them, and prevent DAMPs from potentiating inflammatory response. (C) Highly sulfated HS, heparin, is released by activated mast cells and simultaneously binds to antithrombin III (AT-III) and thrombin to inhibit coagulation cascades. Circulating HS fragments can also bind to AT-III and inhibit factor Xa activity; however, they are usually not long enough to inhibit thrombin. (D) HS binds to chemokines (ex. CXCL-10, CXCL-12, CCL-2) and cytokines (ex. IL-8, IL-10, IL-12), maintaining their concentration gradients to recruit more immune cells. (E) Shed HS fragments act as co-receptors for various ligands, for example, FGF. The formation of HS-FGF-FGFR complex induces downstream signaling pathways for ECM restoration.
Figure 2. Endogenous HS on the cell surface in a disease state. (A) Membrane-bound HS can bind to adhesion molecules on neutrophils, supporting their attachment and rolling on the cell surface. (B) Shed HS fragments can bind to damage associate molecular patterns (DAMPs) (for example, histones and HMGB1 release by neutrophils) during inflammation, neutralize them, and prevent DAMPs from potentiating inflammatory response. (C) Highly sulfated HS, heparin, is released by activated mast cells and simultaneously binds to antithrombin III (AT-III) and thrombin to inhibit coagulation cascades. Circulating HS fragments can also bind to AT-III and inhibit factor Xa activity; however, they are usually not long enough to inhibit thrombin. (D) HS binds to chemokines (ex. CXCL-10, CXCL-12, CCL-2) and cytokines (ex. IL-8, IL-10, IL-12), maintaining their concentration gradients to recruit more immune cells. (E) Shed HS fragments act as co-receptors for various ligands, for example, FGF. The formation of HS-FGF-FGFR complex induces downstream signaling pathways for ECM restoration.
Biomedicines 08 00503 g002
Biomedicines 08 00503 g003 550
Figure 3. The biosynthesis and chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. (A) The biosynthesis of HS. (B) The chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. Recombinant HS biosynthetic enzymes for polymerization and N-sulfation are used to carry out the chemoenzymatic synthesis (highlighted in yellow). Also, unnatural sugar nucleotides such as UDP-GlcNTFA is used in chemoenzymatic synthesis to optimize the synthesis process by increasing specificity and detection. (C) The structure of saccharides involved in the synthesis of HS. 1. Monosaccharides involved in biosynthesis of HS. The structures of GlcA, IdoA, and GlcN can be found in Figure 1A. 2. The conformation diversity of IdoA. 3. The structure of unnatural sugar nucleotides used in chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. kfiA: N-acetyl glucosaminyl transferase from Escherichia coli K5. pmHS2: heparosan synthase 2 from Pasteurella multicida. GlcA-pNP:1-O-(para-nitrophenyl) glucuronide.
Figure 3. The biosynthesis and chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. (A) The biosynthesis of HS. (B) The chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. Recombinant HS biosynthetic enzymes for polymerization and N-sulfation are used to carry out the chemoenzymatic synthesis (highlighted in yellow). Also, unnatural sugar nucleotides such as UDP-GlcNTFA is used in chemoenzymatic synthesis to optimize the synthesis process by increasing specificity and detection. (C) The structure of saccharides involved in the synthesis of HS. 1. Monosaccharides involved in biosynthesis of HS. The structures of GlcA, IdoA, and GlcN can be found in Figure 1A. 2. The conformation diversity of IdoA. 3. The structure of unnatural sugar nucleotides used in chemoenzymatic synthesis of HS. kfiA: N-acetyl glucosaminyl transferase from Escherichia coli K5. pmHS2: heparosan synthase 2 from Pasteurella multicida. GlcA-pNP:1-O-(para-nitrophenyl) glucuronide.
Biomedicines 08 00503 g003
Biomedicines 08 00503 g004 550
Figure 4. Mechanistic summary of sterile inflammation and 18-mer-HP’s role after acetaminophen (APAP) overdose. (A) 1. APAP overdose leads to accumulation of a toxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI), which leads to hepatocyte necrosis and subsequent release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPS). 2. At the same time cell surface syndecan-1 is shed and can bind to extracellular HMGB1 through is HS chains. 3. HMGB1 that is not neutralized can bind to RAGE, resulting in neutrophil recruitment. 4. Neutrophils propagate initial injury by releasing reactive oxygen species and proteases which act on both damaged and healthy tissue. (B) 18-mer-HP reduces liver injury by inhibiting HMGB1-induced neutrophil recruitment.
Figure 4. Mechanistic summary of sterile inflammation and 18-mer-HP’s role after acetaminophen (APAP) overdose. (A) 1. APAP overdose leads to accumulation of a toxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI), which leads to hepatocyte necrosis and subsequent release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPS). 2. At the same time cell surface syndecan-1 is shed and can bind to extracellular HMGB1 through is HS chains. 3. HMGB1 that is not neutralized can bind to RAGE, resulting in neutrophil recruitment. 4. Neutrophils propagate initial injury by releasing reactive oxygen species and proteases which act on both damaged and healthy tissue. (B) 18-mer-HP reduces liver injury by inhibiting HMGB1-induced neutrophil recruitment.
Biomedicines 08 00503 g004
Table
Table 1. Binding requirement of HS sequences with protein. HS with specific length and sulfation pattern is required for binding to protein ligands. Numbers in parentheses indicate the length of tested HS, but the minimal length required for binding has not been determined.
Table 1. Binding requirement of HS sequences with protein. HS with specific length and sulfation pattern is required for binding to protein ligands. Numbers in parentheses indicate the length of tested HS, but the minimal length required for binding has not been determined.
TargetLengthSulfation Pattern of HSBinding EffectsRef
Antithrombin5GlcNS/Ac6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S±6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S- Induce conformational changes, accelerate interaction with factor Xa/thrombin to potentiate anticoagulation[27,28]
Thrombin>18--Simultaneously bind to antithrombin/thrombin, form complexes to potentiate anticoagulation[29]
FGFR106-O-sulfationForm tertiary complex with FGF1 or FGF2[3,30]
FGF24IdoA2S-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNSInduce dimerization[31]
10IdoA2S-GlcNS6S, terminal GlcNS or GlcNAcForm tertiary complex with FGF
Promote inflammation/induce ECM repair		[32]
FGF14IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6SInduce dimerization[33]
20IdoA2S-GlcNS6S, terminal GlcNS6SForm tertiary complex with FGF
Reduce JNK-mediated inflammation		[32]
Wnt63-O-sulfation, 6-O-sulfationCo-receptor for wnt activation
Exacerbate liver cancer		[34]
MCP-16N-sulfation, O-sulfationterminal GlcNS6S for 6-merInduce oligomerization (tetramer);
Retain MCP-1 for leucocyte migration		[35,36]
IL-88N-sulfation, O-sulfationMediate IL-8 activity[37,38]
IL-128Highly sulfated, 3S per disaccharideStabilize IL-12 and enhance activity [39]
Histone102-O-sulfation, N-sulfationNeutralize histone and reduce inflammation[17]
HMGB112Highly sulfated (NS2S, NS6S, NS2S6S, NS2S3S6S)Neutralize HMGB1 and reduce inflammation [8]
Hepcidin>17N-sulfation, 2-O-sulfation, 6-O-sulfationInhibit expression of hepcidin in hepatocytes[7]
Neuropilin-1(12)3-O-sulfationStabilize neuropilin[40]
tau(12)3-O-sulfationInhibit cell surface binding and internalization of tau[41]
Table
Table 2. Chemical structures of HS oligosaccharides used in studies [8,60].
Table 2. Chemical structures of HS oligosaccharides used in studies [8,60].
Name of CompoundAbbreviated Saccharide SequenceReference
Comp 1, 18-mer-HPGlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-[IdoA2S-GlcNS]7-GlcA-pNP[8]
Comp 2, 18-mer-AXaGlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-[IdoA2S-GlcNS6S]7-GlcA-pNP
Comp 3, 12-merGlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-[IdoA2S-GlcNS]4-GlcA-pNP
Comp 4, 6-merGlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNP
Comp 5, 12-mer-NS6SGlcNS6S-[GlcA-GlcNS6S]5-GlcA-pNP[60]
Comp 6, 12-mer-NS2S6SGlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-[IdoA2S-GlcNS6S]4-GlcA-pNP
Comp 7, 12-mer-AXaGlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-[IdoA2S-GlcNS6S]4-GlcA-pNP
Comp 8, 6-mer-AXaGlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arnold, K.; Liao, Y.-E.; Liu, J. Potential Use of Anti-Inflammatory Synthetic Heparan Sulfate to Attenuate Liver Damage. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110503

AMA Style

Arnold K, Liao Y-E, Liu J. Potential Use of Anti-Inflammatory Synthetic Heparan Sulfate to Attenuate Liver Damage. Biomedicines. 2020; 8(11):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arnold, Katelyn, Yi-En Liao, and Jian Liu. 2020. "Potential Use of Anti-Inflammatory Synthetic Heparan Sulfate to Attenuate Liver Damage" Biomedicines 8, no. 11: 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110503

APA Style

Arnold, K., Liao, Y. -E., & Liu, J. (2020). Potential Use of Anti-Inflammatory Synthetic Heparan Sulfate to Attenuate Liver Damage. Biomedicines, 8(11), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop