Next Article in Journal
Pharmacological Effects of a Novel Bradykinin-Related Peptide (RR-18) from the Skin Secretion of the Hejiang Frog (Ordorrana hejiangensis) on Smooth Muscle
Next Article in Special Issue
Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in Experimental Model of Fibromyalgia: Role of Hidrox®
Previous Article in Journal
HDX-MS: An Analytical Tool to Capture Protein Motion in Action
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/biomedicines8070223
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Key Milestones Contributing to the Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Fibromyalgia

by
Geoffrey Littlejohn
1,2,* and
Emma Guymer
1,2
1
Departments of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia
2
Departments of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne 3168, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2020, 8(7), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070223
Submission received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 11 July 2020 / Accepted: 12 July 2020 / Published: 17 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Therapies for Fibromyalgia II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The promulgation of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) classification has significantly contributed to an era of increased research into mechanisms that underlie the disorder. The previous emphasis on putative peripheral nociceptive mechanisms has advanced to identifying of changes in central neural networks that modulate pain and other sensory processes. The influences of psychosocial factors on the dynamic and complex neurobiological mechanisms involved in the fibromyalgia clinical phenotype are now better defined. This review highlights key milestones that have directed knowledge concerning the fundamental mechanisms contributing to fibromyalgia.

Graphical Abstract

The clinical features that characterise the phenotype designated by fibromyalgia (FM) have long been described in both general and medical literature. However, the promulgation of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 classification criteria for fibromyalgia [1] triggered a marked increase in focused research into clinical, social, and mechanistic aspects of the disorder. The criteria acted as a watershed for better understanding and management of this highly impactful and common disorder. We reviewed selected observations on mechanisms deemed to be important in fibromyalgia, with an emphasis on neurophysiological processes, but with recognition of significant input from social and psychological factors (Table 1).

1. Describing Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia is characterised by a distinctive collection of contributing features that typically include widespread pain and tenderness, muscle tightness, peripheral dysesthesia, soft tissue swelling, emotional distress, poor quality sleep, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction [2]. These features are described in ancient writings and appear in medical descriptions from the 19th century [3,4], reflecting the ubiquitous presence of this condition.
Fibromyalgia, under many different names, was more clearly defined over 100 years ago, but it was not until the 1970s that Smythe and Moldofsky described the crucial clinical characteristics of the disorder [5]. They focused on the clinical features of widespread pain and tenderness; they noted that particular sites in the body (known as “tender points”) were predictably more sensitive to palpation in those with fibromyalgia than in healthy controls. They also recognised several central characteristics (in contrast to peripheral) such as fatigue, poor sleep, and emotional distress. Others extended these observations and identified significant associations with conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder syndrome, and migraine, among other disorders [6,7].

2. Evolution of Classification and Diagnostic Criteria

Classification criteria emerged in the 1970s, focusing on a mix of defining clinical features that included widespread pain, tenderness, and other symptoms [5,6]. The 1990 ACR classification criteria were a more robust refinement of previous criteria and better defined a fibromyalgia patient for purposes of research [1]. Later criteria focused on patients self-reporting their key symptoms; furthermore, the criteria recognised that the symptoms of fibromyalgia exist on a spectrum, allowing for a better understanding of the fluctuations in these symptoms, along with responses to therapies [8,9,10,11]. Other criteria were explored with different characteristics [12,13]. In the 2020s, newer criteria explore combinations of the self-reporting of key fibromyalgia-related clinical features, such as fatigue, insomnia, and bedside clinical measures of central sensitization, such as slowly repeated evoked pain responses [14]. These post-1990 ACR criteria have further enhanced the understanding of fibromyalgia’s key elements by both healthcare workers and patients.
The 1990 ACR criteria are seen as a lift-off point for ongoing validated classification and diagnostic criteria, which can be used in different circumstances ranging from epidemiological to neurobiological explorations, in patients deemed to have fibromyalgia. Importantly, the criteria promulgated the change in name from the previous term, fibrositis, to fibromyalgia, one that had been suggested by others earlier [15]. This name change reflected a transformation in thinking of the underlying mechanisms contributing to fibromyalgia (Figure 1).

3. Exploration of Peripheral Muscle Mechanisms was Prominent Prior to the 1990 ACR Criteria

Key clinical features of fibromyalgia, such as pain, tenderness, and stiffness, are predominantly present in muscle and joint regions. Due to this, peripheral nociceptive causes for the condition have long been sought. Early concepts of mechanisms contributing to these features included muscle inflammation, fascia inflammation, or both [16,17]. Histomorphometry assessments of tissues taken from regions of pain in patients deemed to have fibromyalgia were initially thought to show soft-tissue inflammatory change [18]; this was part of the reason that the term “fibrositis” continued to be used for several decades. Subsequent histological studies did not show classic inflammation of muscle or other local tissues as a characteristic of fibromyalgia [19,20]. Other studies on muscle metabolism, when patients with equal general fitness and muscle disuse are used as controls, did not show changes specific to fibromyalgia [20,21]. However, abnormalities in muscle physiology are observed in fibromyalgia [22], with augmented muscle membrane propagation reactions independent of force load or amount of muscle activity, suggesting central deregulation [23].
Pain generators within muscles, such as myofascial trigger points, have been shown to modulate generalised tenderness in fibromyalgia [24].

4. Neuroinflammation as a Peripheral Pain Mechanism

The 1990 ACR criteria made note of cutaneous dermatographia, related to the release of inflammatory products such as neuropeptides, glutamate, and cytokines, particularly from C-fibre nociceptors in the skin, a process termed neuroinflammation [25]. There are subsequent interactions with both the innate and acquired immune systems and related cells, including keratinocytes and mast cells [26]. Neuroinflammation likely contributes to many of fibromyalgia’s clinical features, such as arthralgia and myalgia, and may account for the increased rate of peripheral neuropathic findings in fibromyalgia [27].
The peripheral C-nociceptors show enhanced spontaneous activity and sensitisation to mechanical stimuli [28] and there is evidence of small nerve fibre pathology in approximately 50% of fibromyalgia patients [27]. These peripheral changes contribute to clinical features including swelling and dysesthesia.
This mechanism also links to other clinical phenotypes that compose the central characteristics of fibromyalgia, such as irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder syndrome, migraine, restless legs syndrome (RLS), and multiple chemical sensitivity, among others [29]. The increased activity in C-nociceptive fibre afferents lying behind this process likely relates to central sensitization within the spinal cord’s dorsal horn, as discussed later [26].

5. Referred Pain as a Peripheral Pain Mechanism

Building on the work of others [30,31], Smythe suggested that pain from deep spinal structures, such as the lower neck or back, could contribute to the mechanism for the widespread pain distribution [5,32]. These observations continued after the 1990 ACR criteria and remain relevant to a mechanistic understanding of fibromyalgia, but require further exploration in the context of current concepts of central sensitization.

6. Characterization of Central Sensitization in Fibromyalgia after the 1990 ACR Criteria

Exploration and understanding of the amplification of sensory inputs to the spinal cord and brain in fibromyalgia accelerated after the 1990 ACR criteria were disseminated. This process, known as central sensitisation, has become recognised as a key mechanism causing a wide range of symptoms in fibromyalgia. The demonstration of a generalised decrease of pain sensitivity in fibromyalgia patients and increased reactivity to peripheral stimulation of nociceptor nerves were important steps to understanding fibromyalgia as a disorder driven by central mechanisms [33,34].
Soon after the 1990 ACR criteria, an early key finding was that A-delta nociceptor stimulation results in increased cerebral evoked responses in the somatosensory cortex [35]. Repetitive stimulation of C-nociceptive fibres results in temporal summation in the spinal cord in normal controls and exaggerates this process in fibromyalgia [36]. Nociceptive-evoked reflex responses in fibromyalgia patients compared to controls showed less peripheral stimulation is required to elicit reflex muscle changes, indicating increased neural sensitivity in the spinal cord [37,38]. These observations indicate increased sensitivity to peripheral nociceptive sensory stimuli in fibromyalgia and reflect the process of central sensitization [39].
The increased excitability of the spinal cord’s dorsal horn neurones is characterised by increased spontaneous neuronal activity, large receptive fields, and augmented stimulus responses, including those transmitted by both large and small calibre primary afferent fibres.
Allodynia, a term that describes pain induced by a non-noxious stimulus, is a key clinical feature of fibromyalgia; this is the mechanism behind abnormal tenderness and relates to increased sensitivity in the large mechanoreceptor fibre group. In the context of central sensitisation, peripheral A-beta fibres, which normally function as mechanoreceptor afferents, interact with sensitised wide dynamic range receptor neurones in the spinal cord’s dorsal horn. The altered neuroplasticity translates innocuous peripheral sensory inputs to pain outputs and provides a link between everyday movements, activities, postures, and other triggers that provoke fibromyalgia pain. This process also has particular relevance to the deeply placed mechanoreceptors in and around spinal structures, such as the lower neck and back. This mechanism would convert mechanoreceptor sensory input to a nociceptor-type function, which results in activation of referred pain mechanisms from the spinal regions, with resultant regionalised pain, tenderness, and other sensory complaints that are typically seen in fibromyalgia. Further evidence to clarify this proposed mechanism is required.
Even though there is evidence that peripheral nociceptive afferent fibres (i.e., A-delta fibres and C-nociceptor fibres) may play a role in central sensitization [24,40], it is felt that there is little indication of a continuous nociceptive input that would be needed to cause central sensitisation in fibromyalgia. However, the brain’s powerful modulatory effects through descending influences seem to be more important in the fibromyalgia mechanism [41].

7. Neurotransmitters

In the context of central sensitisation in regards to fibromyalgia, there are a number of neurotransmitters that are elevated compared to controls. These include substance P and glutamate, both of which activate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors that promote pain transmission [42,43,44].
Substance P, in particular, is a potent neuropeptide released from the terminals of specific sensory nerves and binds to NK-1 receptors. It lowers the synaptic threshold in second-order spinal neurones and, in turn, is released by the activation of NMDA receptors in the dorsal horn. Substance P can travel extensively along the spinal cord to sensitise distant dorsal horn neurones. Substance P is also closely associated with 5-hydroxytryptamine/serotonin (5-HT) in the brain, particularly in areas responsible for emotion and pain perception. Substance P levels are elevated up to three times normal in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with fibromyalgia [45,46,47].
A number of studies also showed increases in glutamate following noxious stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia [48]. These changes are reversed by the administration of the potent NMDA antagonist ketamine in humans [49]. In fibromyalgia, other neuropeptides such as nerve growth factor are also elevated [50] as they are in other painful rheumatic diseases [51]. Other neurotransmitters are also altered to varying degrees, demonstrating the complexity of the pathophysiology. These include calcitonin gene-related peptide, brain-derived neurotrophic factors, corticotrophin-releasing hormone, hemokinen-1, neurokinin A, neurokinin B, adrenomedullin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, neuropeptide Y, and gastrin-releasing peptide [26].

8. Descending Pathways in Fibromyalgia

Key brain-to-spinal cord connections originate in the emotion-linked brain regions and pass through mid-brain structures, including the raphe nuclei (upper medulla), the periaqueductal grey, and the locus coeruleus, and then link down to the dorsal horn through reticulospinal fibres. These powerful signaling pathways link supraspinal structures to the activities of the spinal cord sensory transmission neurons. Where these pathways initiate anti-nociceptive activity, the term “diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) pathway” is used. Dysfunction of this pathway was identified as a fundamental mechanism contributing to pain and other clinical features of fibromyalgia.
These descending pathways involve the monoamine neurotransmitters, 5-HT, and norepinephrine (NE), which modulate the descending inhibitory “tone” that affects transmission neurones associated with dorsal horn pain, and appears important in the facilitation of the pain sensitization process at that level [52,53]. Where there is pain sensitisation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord through lowered DNIC tone, there is an inability to inhibit transmission of pain-related sensory stimuli, which are then perceived as pain.
Descending pain inhibition is demonstrated in humans by the application of a tonic conditioning nociceptive stimulus. Pain inhibition involving the DNIC is elicited by applying a cold pressor test involving, for instance, submerging the patient’s arm in ice-cold water. In healthy patients, DNIC is demonstrated by the reduction in the patient perception of the initial painful test stimulus at another site. Over time, particularly in the 2000s, several studies showed fibromyalgia patients to demonstrate a lower thermal pain threshold and a lower reduction in the perception of the initial test stimulus after application of the cold pressor test. This indicates that the DNIC is not functioning normally in fibromyalgia [53,54,55]. This process may also involve attenuation of normal “wind-up” pain by C-nociceptive fibre activation in fibromyalgia. Notably, DNIC dysfunction does not occur in depression, highlighting the presence of fundamentally different mechanisms in depression and fibromyalgia [56,57].
The rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) plays a vital role in descending modulatory pain function. Notably, there is an attenuation of rACC function in fibromyalgia. The cerebral response to individually calibrated pain provocation of a pain-free body region, measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), shows higher sensitivity to pain provocation in fibromyalgia patients than in controls. These studies do not show any difference in the activity of these brain regions relating to affect or regions with sensory projections from the stimulated body area. However, fibromyalgia patients failed to respond to pain provocation in the rACC descending pain regulatory system, indicating dysfunction in the downward inhibitory tone from this pathway onto the dorsal horn [58].
NE and 5-HT are the key neurotransmitters of the DNIC pathway. In fibromyalgia, multiple studies showed a reduction of both serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of serotonergic and NE metabolites [42,59,60]. Medications that target and modulate these monoamine neurotransmitters were beneficial in reducing symptoms in some patients in clinical trials [61].

9. The Brain in Fibromyalgia

To better define fibromyalgia patients, the 1990 ACR criteria corresponded with developments in neuroimaging; this has subsequently allowed for an enhanced understanding of the neurobiological processes involved in fibromyalgia mechanisms [62]. Several studies showed that there are significant differences in functional neuroimaging in fibromyalgia patients than controls. These relate to central pain processing, differences in affective processing of pain, and modulation of the brain’s influence on spinal cord sensory control mechanisms.
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) techniques using radiotracers infer neural activity from localised increases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). A range of abnormalities involving rCBF occurs in fibromyalgia. These abnormalities include reduced flow in the dorsolateral frontal cortical areas of both hemispheres, the thalamus, the head of caudate nucleus, the inferior pontine tegmentum, the superior parietal cortex, and the gyrus rectus [63]. These studies indicated that a range of functional abnormalities related to pain processing occurs in fibromyalgia, and these involve a variety of areas in the brain. SPECT studies also showed hyperperfusion of the somatosensory cortex and related area change. In contrast, hypoperfusion of the amygdala and the anterior insula are significant in the attention dimensions of pain response [64]. There are differences between the findings in these structures between fibromyalgia and depression.
fMRI also demonstrates central neural activation patterns showing increased blood flow to pain processing areas at a lower stimulation threshold in fibromyalgia than in controls [65]. Changes were reported in intrinsic connectivity in fibromyalgia patients compared to controls. The maintenance of the brain’s resting state displays greater connectivity to regions involved in pain processing in fibromyalgia patients than controls [66]. These changes reduce as fibromyalgia pain decreases [67]. Connectivity between the default mode network and pain inhibitory centres is decreased, while connectivity is increased with the insula [68].
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which assesses brain metabolism by determining the concentration of specific metabolites such as glutamate and glutamine, shows fibromyalgia patients have significantly high levels of these compounds in the right posterior insular area compared to controls [69]. This concentration correlates with lower pressure pain thresholds indicating a potential link between these two observations. The alpha-2/delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels in pain-related neurons is down-regulated by drugs such as gabapentin or pregabalin, resulting in decreased excitatory release substances, including glutamate and glutamine. Medications that target glutamatergic mechanisms, such as these alpha-2/delta ligands, may be beneficial in fibromyalgia [61].
In the last decade, understanding of glial cell activation associated with neuroinflammation has increased. This process is inferred by the elevation of cytokine IL-8, but not IL-1β in the CSF of fibromyalgia patients compared to controls [70,71]. IL-8 is co-localised with the translocator protein (TSPO) in glial cells, which is the rate-limiting step in serotonin synthesis, and hence, it modulates serotonergic synaptic transmission, and descending pain modulation. In fibromyalgia, genetic polymorphisms of TSPO are associated with symptom severity, cerebral pain processing, and interact with the serotonin transporter gene [71]. Brain glial activation, as seen on PET scans, show widespread cortical activations in fibromyalgia patients compared to controls, and correlates with fatigue [72]. MRS techniques show neuroinflammation in fibromyalgia [73].

10. Genetic Factors

Since the 1990 ACR criteria allowed better classification of fibromyalgia, further research of affected families and twin studies showed that up to 50% may be genetic factors [74]. Genetic factors modulate activity in relevant neurobiological systems, such as stress-response systems [75,76,77]. Further understanding of the relationship of genetic factors to fibromyalgia phenotypes, such as early onset fibromyalgia, may allow for different management strategies in different subsets [78].

11. Psychological Factors in Fibromyalgia

Several psychological factors may be relevant to the central processes causing pain in fibromyalgia patients [57]. These factors were studied and reviewed in the decade after the 1990 ACR criteria [79]. Patients with fibromyalgia often react adversely to a psychological input that is perceived to be stressful [80]. Some people are more prone to this abnormal stress reactivity than others. Patients with fibromyalgia are more likely to have personalities characterised as neurotic, defined as an enduring tendency to experience negative emotional states, using routine personality classification [81]. This type of personality is more prone to react to stress adversely. Other relevant psychological inputs include poor coping abilities and tendencies to calamity under stressful situations [82]. These types of processes often overlap. The subsequent stress reaction links to the processes modulating the downward pain control centers from the brain and mid-brain to the dorsal horn [83].
Persons with fibromyalgia tend to be more anxious, with increased chances of depression compared to controls [84]. The lifetime rate of depression in persons with fibromyalgia may be up to approximately 50% to 60%, and the point prevalence is around 20% to 25%. The mechanisms of depression include changes in similar monoamine transmitters, such as serotonin and NE, as occur in fibromyalgia. Some medications that target fibromyalgia pain also target depression [61]. However, other medications, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, significantly help depression but may not modify fibromyalgia pain.
Depression does not cause fibromyalgia; hence, it is a common comorbid factor rather than a causative factor.

12. Sleep in Fibromyalgia

Early studies by Moldofsky [85] suggested that sleep disturbance might precede the onset and contribute to symptoms of fibromyalgia. Understanding the importance of sleep in fibromyalgia preceded the 1990 ACR criteria, but has been clarified in decades since. For instance, sleep deprivation was shown to impair descending pain modulation pathways important in pain control and coping with pain [86].

13. Stress Reactivity in Fibromyalgia

The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis links psychological and emotional factors to neuroendocrine output. Many studies explored the role of this stress axis in a variety of chronic pain conditions, including fibromyalgia [87,88]. Dysfunction occurs in various elements of the HPA axis, with elevated basal levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and abnormal secretion in response to stress. Patients also have lower levels of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, thyroxin, estrogen, and urinary cortisol [89].
It has been postulated that some changes in neuroendocrine function in fibromyalgia patients may contribute to some symptoms contributing to a characteristic phenotype, such as fatigue. Blind studies replacing growth hormone reported improvement in many of the characteristic symptoms, such as tenderness, and overall well-being [90]. Many other neuropeptides, including neuropeptide Y, are also altered in fibromyalgia patients compared to controls, but their clinical significance is unclear [91].
Evaluation of the sympathetic nervous system through measurement of heart rate variability shows excessive sympathetic tone and sympathetic reactivity to stress [92].

14. Social Factors

A range of psychosocial factors has been linked to onset, exacerbation, or perpetuation of fibromyalgia [57,93]. Illness burden and emotional distress are highly associated with fibromyalgia, likely related to neurophysiological consequences of activation of the stress response [94,95]. These are not the subject of this review.

15. Summary

Understanding of mechanisms contributing to the fibromyalgia phenotype has evolved with considerable benefit derived from the promulgation of the 1990 ACR criteria. Mechanisms relevant to fibromyalgia are grounded in increased knowledge of the interaction between stress-response systems and sensory modulation, with a particular interest in pain-related neural functioning.
Since the 1990 ACR classification criteria, the criteria have evolved so that fibromyalgia features are seen as occurring on a spectrum [9]. This development reflects the variable nature of psychosocial inputs and neurophysiological responses linked to fibromyalgia’s clinical features.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wolfe, F.; Smythe, H.A.; Yunus, M.B.; Bennett, R.M.; Bombardier, C.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Tugwell, P.; Campbell, S.M.; Abeles, M.; Clark, P.; et al. The American college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 33, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hauser, W.; Ablin, J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Littlejohn, G.; Luciano, J.V.; Usui, C.; Walitt, B. Fibromyalgia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Inanici, F.; Yunus, M.B. History of fibromyalgia: Past to present. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2004, 8, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wallace, D. History of fibromyalgia. In Fibromyalgia. The Essential Clinicians Guide; Clauw, D., Wallace, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smythe, H.A.; Moldofsky, H. Two contributions to understanding of the “fibrositis” syndrome. Bull. Rheum. Dis. 1977, 28, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Yunus, M.; Masi, A.T.; Calabro, J.J.; Miller, K.A.; Feigenbaum, S.L. Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): Clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 1981, 11, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wolfe, F. The clinical syndrome of fibrositis. Am. J. Med. 1986, 81, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Katz, R.S.; Mease, P.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Winfield, J.B.; Yunus, M.B. The American college of rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res. 2010, 62, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Hauser, W.; Katz, R.S.; Mease, P.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Winfield, J.B. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: A modification of the acr preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia. J. Rheumatol. 2011, 38, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Hauser, W.; Katz, R.L.; Mease, P.J.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Walitt, B. 2016 revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2016, 46, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wolfe, F.; Butler, S.H.; Fitzcharles, M.; Hauser, W.; Katz, R.L.; Mease, P.J.; Rasker, J.J.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Walitt, B. Revised chronic widespread pain criteria: Development from and integration with fibromyalgia criteria. Scand. J. Pain 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Littlejohn, G. Fibromyalgia: Honing fibromyalgia diagnosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Clauw, D. Time to stop the fm wars–and refocus on identifying and treating individuals with this type of pain earlier in their illnesso. Arthritis Care Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Galvez-Sanchez, C.M.; Reyes Del Paso, G.A. Diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia: Critical review and future perspectives. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hench, P.K.; Mitler, M.M. Fibromyalgia. 1. Review of a common rheumatologic syndrome. Postgrad. Med. 1986, 80, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Balfour, W. Observations on the pathology and cure of rheumatism. Edinb. Med. Surg. J. 1815, 11, 168–187. [Google Scholar]
  17. Scudamore, C. A Treatise on the Nature and Cure of Rheumatism; Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Gren, Paternoster Row: London, UK, 1827. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stockman, R. The causes, pathology, and treatment of chronic rheumatism. Edinb. Med. J. 1904, 15, 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  19. Collins, D.H. Infection and fibrositis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1940, 2, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yunus, M.B.; Kalyan-Raman, U.P. Muscle biopsy findings in primary fibromyalgia and other forms of nonarticular rheumatism. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 1989, 15, 115–134. [Google Scholar]
  21. Simms, R.W. Fibromyalgia is not a muscle disorder. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1998, 315, 346–350. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ruggiero, L.; Manganelli, F.; Santoro, L. Muscle pain syndromes and fibromyalgia: The role of muscle biopsy. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2018, 12, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Klaver-Krol, E.G.; Rasker, J.J.; Klaver, M.M.; Ten Klooster, P.M.; Zwarts, M.J. Fibromyalgia: Increased reactivity of the muscle membrane and a role of central regulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2019, 130, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Affaitati, G.; Costantini, R.; Fabrizio, A.; Lapenna, D.; Tafuri, E.; Giamberardino, M.A. Effects of treatment of peripheral pain generators in fibromyalgia patients. Eur. J. Pain 2011, 15, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Littlejohn, G.O.; Weinstein, C.; Helme, R.D. Increased neurogenic inflammation in fibrositis syndrome. J. Rheumatol. 1987, 14, 1022–1025. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Littlejohn, G.; Guymer, E. Neurogenic inflammation in fibromyalgia. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Grayston, R.; Czanner, G.; Elhadd, K.; Goebel, A.; Frank, B.; Uceyler, N.; Malik, R.A.; Alam, U. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of small fiber pathology in fibromyalgia: Implications for a new paradigm in fibromyalgia etiopathogenesis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 48, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Serra, J.; Collado, A.; Sola, R.; Antonelli, F.; Torres, X.; Salgueiro, M.; Quiles, C.; Bostock, H. Hyperexcitable c nociceptors in fibromyalgia. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 75, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yunus, M.B. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: The unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 36, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kellgren, J.H. On distribution of pain arising from deep somatic structures with charts of segmental pain areas. Clin. Sci. 1939, 4, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  31. Graham, W. Fibrositis. In Arthritis and Allied Conditions; Hollander, J.L., Ed.; Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1949; pp. 647–662. [Google Scholar]
  32. Smythe, H. Referred pain and tender points. Am. J. Med. 1986, 81, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Arroyo, J.F.; Cohen, M.L. Abnormal responses to electrocutaneous stimulation in fibromyalgia. J. Rheumatol. 1993, 20, 1925–1931. [Google Scholar]
  34. Granges, G.; Littlejohn, G. Pressure pain threshold in pain-free subjects, in patients with chronic regional pain syndromes, and in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1993, 36, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gibson, S.J.; Littlejohn, G.O.; Gorman, M.M.; Helme, R.D.; Granges, G. Altered heat pain thresholds and cerebral event-related potentials following painful co2 laser stimulation in subjects with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 1994, 58, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Staud, R.; Robinson, M.E.; Price, D.D. Temporal summation of second pain and its maintenance are useful for characterizing widespread central sensitization of fibromyalgia patients. J. Pain 2007, 8, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Desmeules, J.A.; Cedraschi, C.; Rapiti, E.; Baumgartner, E.; Finckh, A.; Cohen, P.; Dayer, P.; Vischer, T.L. Neurophysiologic evidence for a central sensitization in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48, 1420–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Banic, B.; Petersen-Felix, S.; Andersen, O.K.; Radanov, B.P.; Villiger, P.M.; Arendt-Nielsen, L.; Curatolo, M. Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain 2004, 107, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Woolf, C.J. Central sensitization: Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 2011, 152, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Staud, R. Is it all central sensitization. Role of peripheral tissue nociception in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2010, 12, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. DeSantana, J.M.; Sluka, K.A. Central mechanisms in the maintenance of chronic widespread noninflammatory muscle pain. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2008, 12, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Russell, I.J.; Vaeroy, H.; Javors, M.; Nyberg, F. Cerebrospinal fluid biogenic amine metabolites in fibromyalgia/fibrositis syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992, 35, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Becker, S.; Schweinhardt, P. Dysfunctional neurotransmitter systems in fibromyalgia, their role in central stress circuitry and pharmacological actions on these systems. Pain Res. Treat 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Littlejohn, G.; Guymer, E. Modulation of nmda receptor activity in fibromyalgia. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lyon, P.; Cohen, M.; Quintner, J. An evolutionary stress-response hypothesis for chronic widespread pain (fibromyalgia syndrome). Pain Med. 2011, 12, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vaeroy, H.; Helle, R.; Forre, O.; Kass, E.; Terenius, L. Elevated csf levels of substance p and high incidence of raynaud phenomenon in patients with fibromyalgia: New features for diagnosis. Pain 1988, 32, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Russell, I.J.; Orr, M.D.; Littman, B.; Vipraio, G.A.; Alboukrek, D.; Michalek, J.E.; Lopez, Y.; MacKillip, F. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid levels of substance p in patients with the fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1994, 37, 1593–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarchielli, P.; Di Filippo, M.; Nardi, K.; Calabresi, P. Sensitization, glutamate, and the link between migraine and fibromyalgia. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2007, 11, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Graven-Nielsen, T.; Aspegren Kendall, S.; Henriksson, K.G.; Bengtsson, M.; Sorensen, J.; Johnson, A.; Gerdle, B.; Arendt-Nielsen, L. Ketamine reduces muscle pain, temporal summation, and referred pain in fibromyalgia patients. Pain 2000, 85, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Giovengo, S.L.; Russell, I.J.; Larson, A.A. Increased concentrations of nerve growth factor in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with fibromyalgia. J. Rheumatol. 1999, 26, 1564–1569. [Google Scholar]
  51. Seidel, M.F.; Herguijuela, M.; Forkert, R.; Otten, U. Nerve growth factor in rheumatic diseases. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 40, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Montoya, P.; Sitges, C.; Garcia-Herrera, M.; Rodriguez-Cotes, A.; Izquierdo, R.; Truyols, M.; Collado, D. Reduced brain habituation to somatosensory stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 1995–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Julien, N.; Goffaux, P.; Arsenault, P.; Marchand, S. Widespread pain in fibromyalgia is related to a deficit of endogenous pain inhibition. Pain 2005, 114, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yarnitsky, D. Conditioned pain modulation (the diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect): Its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2010, 23, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schweinhardt, P.; Sauro, K.M.; Bushnell, M.C. Fibromyalgia: A disorder of the brain. Neuroscientist 2008, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Normand, E.; Potvin, S.; Gaumond, I.; Cloutier, G.; Corbin, J.F.; Marchand, S. Pain inhibition is deficient in chronic widespread pain but normal in major depressive disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2011, 72, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Thiagarajah, A.S.; Guymer, E.K.; Leech, M.T.; Littlejohn, G.O. The relationship between fibromyalgia, stress and depression. Int. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 9, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jensen, K.B.; Kosek, E.; Petzke, F.; Carville, S.; Fransson, P.; Marcus, H.; Williams, S.C.; Choy, E.; Giesecke, T.; Mainguy, Y.; et al. Evidence of dysfunctional pain inhibition in fibromyalgia reflected in racc during provoked pain. Pain 2009, 144, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ernberg, M.; Voog, U.; Alstergren, P.; Lundeberg, T.; Kopp, S. Plasma and serum serotonin levels and their relationship to orofacial pain and anxiety in fibromyalgia. J. Orofac. Pain 2000, 14, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wolfe, F.; Russell, I.J.; Vipraio, G.; Ross, K.; Anderson, J. Serotonin levels, pain threshold, and fibromyalgia symptoms in the general population. J. Rheumatol. 1997, 24, 555–559. [Google Scholar]
  61. Northcott, M.J.; Guymer, E.; Littlejohn, G.O. Pharmacologic treatment options for fibromyalgia. Clin. Pharm. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bosma, R.L.; Hemington, K.S.; Davis, K.D. Using magnetic resonance imaging to visualize the brain in chronic pain. Pain 2017, 158, 1192–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mountz, J.M.; Bradley, L.A.; Alarcon, G.S. Abnormal functional activity of the central nervous system in fibromyalgia syndrome. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1998, 315, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Guedj, E.; Cammilleri, S.; Niboyet, J.; Dupont, P.; Vidal, E.; Dropinski, J.P.; Mundler, O. Clinical correlate of brain spect perfusion abnormalities in fibromyalgia. J. Nucl. Med. 2008, 49, 1798–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Nebel, M.B.; Gracely, R.H. Neuroimaging of fibromyalgia. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2009, 35, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Napadow, V.; LaCount, L.; Park, K.; As-Sanie, S.; Clauw, D.J.; Harris, R.E. Intrinsic brain connectivity in fibromyalgia is associated with chronic pain intensity. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 2545–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Napadow, V.; Kim, J.; Clauw, D.J.; Harris, R.E. Decreased intrinsic brain connectivity is associated with reduced clinical pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Jensen, K.B.; Loitoile, R.; Kosek, E.; Petzke, F.; Carville, S.; Fransson, P.; Marcus, H.; Williams, S.C.; Choy, E.; Mainguy, Y.; et al. Patients with fibromyalgia display less functional connectivity in the brain’s pain inhibitory network. Mol. Pain 2012, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Harris, R.E.; Sundgren, P.C.; Craig, A.D.; Kirshenbaum, E.; Sen, A.; Napadow, V.; Clauw, D.J. Elevated insular glutamate in fibromyalgia is associated with experimental pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 3146–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kadetoff, D.; Lampa, J.; Westman, M.; Andersson, M.; Kosek, E. Evidence of central inflammation in fibromyalgia-increased cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-8 levels. J. Neuroimmunol. 2012, 242, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Kosek, E.; Martinsen, S.; Gerdle, B.; Mannerkorpi, K.; Lofgren, M.; Bileviciute-Ljungar, I.; Fransson, P.; Schalling, M.; Ingvar, M.; Ernberg, M.; et al. The translocator protein gene is associated with symptom severity and cerebral pain processing in fibromyalgia. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 58, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Albrecht, D.S.; Forsberg, A.; Sandstrom, A.; Bergan, C.; Kadetoff, D.; Protsenko, E.; Lampa, J.; Lee, Y.C.; Hoglund, C.O.; Catana, C.; et al. Brain glial activation in fibromyalgia—A multi-site positron emission tomography investigation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019, 75, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jung, C.; Ichesco, E.; Ratai, E.-M.; Gonzalez, R.G.; Ramon, G.; Burdo, T.; Loggia, M.L.; Harris, R.E.; Napadow, V. Magnetic resonance imaging of neuroinflammation in chronic pain: A role for astrogliosis. Pain 2020, 161, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bennett, R. Fibromyalgia: Present to future. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2004, 8, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Stormorken, H.; Brosstad, F. Fibromyalgia: Family clustering and sensory urgency with early onset indicate genetic predisposition and thus a “true” disease. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 1992, 21, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Arnold, L.M.; Hudson, J.I.; Hess, E.V.; Ware, A.E.; Fritz, D.A.; Auchenbach, M.B.; Starck, L.O.; Keck, P.E., Jr. Family study of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ablin, J.N.; Buskila, D. Update on the genetics of the fibromyalgia syndrome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2015, 29, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dutta, D.; Brumett, C.; Moser, S.; Fritsche, L.; Tsodikov, A.; Clauw, D.; Scott, L. Heritability of the fibromyalgia phenotype varies by age. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fitzcharles, M.A.; Yunus, M.B. The clinical concept of fibromyalgia as a changing paradigm in the past 20 years. Pain Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 184835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ablin, K.; Clauw, D.J. From fibrositis to functional somatic syndromes to a bell-shaped curve of pain and sensory sensitivity: Evolution of a clinical construct. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2009, 35, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Malin, K.; Littlejohn, G.O. Neuroticism in young women with fibromyalgia links to key clinical features. Pain Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 730–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. McBeth, J.; Macfarlane, G.J.; Benjamin, S.; Morris, S.; Silman, A.J. The association between tender points, psychological distress, and adverse childhood experiences: A community-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Littlejohn, G.; Guymer, E. Central processes underlying fibromyalgia. Eur. Med. J. 2018, 3, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  84. Staud, R. Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia: Pain in fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Moldofsky, H.; Scarisbrick, P.; England, R.; Smythe, H. Musculosketal symptoms and non-rem sleep disturbance in patients with “fibrositis syndrome” and healthy subjects. Psychosom. Med. 1975, 37, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Choy, E.H. The role of sleep in pain and fibromyalgia. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tanriverdi, F.; Karaca, Z.; Unluhizarci, K.; Kelestimur, F. The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome. Stress 2007, 10, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Riedel, W.; Layka, H.; Neeck, G. Secretory pattern of gh, tsh, thyroid hormones, acth, cortisol, fsh, and lh in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome following systemic injection of the relevant hypothalamic-releasing hormones. Z Rheumatol. 1998, 57, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Adler, G.K.; Geenen, R. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and autonomic nervous system functioning in fibromyalgia. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 31, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bennett, R.M.; Clark, S.C.; Walczyk, J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of growth hormone in the treatment of fibromyalgia. Am. J. Med. 1998, 104, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Anderberg, U.M.; Uvnas-Moberg, K. Plasma oxytocin levels in female fibromyalgia syndrome patients. Z Rheumatol. 2000, 59, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lerma, C.; Martinez, A.; Ruiz, N.; Vargas, A.; Infante, O.; Martinez-Lavin, M. Nocturnal heart rate variability parameters as potential fibromyalgia biomarker: Correlation with symptoms severity. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Van Houdenhove, B.; Luyten, P. Stress, depression and fibromyalgia. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2006, 106, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  94. Wolfe, F.; Ablin, J.; Guymer, E.K.; Littlejohn, G.O.; Rasker, J.J. The relation of physical comorbidity and multimorbidity to fibromyalgia, widespread pain, and fibromyalgia-related variables. J. Rheumatol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hauser, W.; Henningsen, P. Fibromyalgia syndrome: A somatoform disorder. Eur. J. Pain 2014, 18, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 08 00223 g001 550
Figure 1. The 1990 ACR criteria accelerated and broadened the curve of knowledge of mechanisms contributing to fibromyalgia in many overlapping domains.
Figure 1. The 1990 ACR criteria accelerated and broadened the curve of knowledge of mechanisms contributing to fibromyalgia in many overlapping domains.
Biomedicines 08 00223 g001
Table
Table 1. Key mechanisms underlying fibromyalgia advanced by ACR 1990 criteria.
Table 1. Key mechanisms underlying fibromyalgia advanced by ACR 1990 criteria.
Neural MechanismsType of Mechanism
PeripheralMechanoreceptor input
Referred pain
Nociception
Sympathetic nervous system
Neuroinflammation
Spinal cordCentral sensitization
Descending spinal cord control
BrainNeurotransmitter changes
Connectivity changes
Neuroinflammation
Other mechanismsGenetic
Psychological
Stress reactivity
Social factors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Littlejohn, G.; Guymer, E. Key Milestones Contributing to the Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Fibromyalgia. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070223

AMA Style

Littlejohn G, Guymer E. Key Milestones Contributing to the Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Fibromyalgia. Biomedicines. 2020; 8(7):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Littlejohn, Geoffrey, and Emma Guymer. 2020. "Key Milestones Contributing to the Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Fibromyalgia" Biomedicines 8, no. 7: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070223

APA Style

Littlejohn, G., & Guymer, E. (2020). Key Milestones Contributing to the Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Fibromyalgia. Biomedicines, 8(7), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop