Safety Assessment of Prolonged Nerve Catheters in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Case Series Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Cases and Results
3. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pardesi, O.; Fuzaylov, G. Pain management in pediatric burn patients: Review of recent literature and further directions. J. Burn Care Res. 2017, 38, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walker, B.; Long, J.; De Oliveira, G.; Szmuk, P.; Setiawan, C.; Polaner, D.; Suresh, S.; the PRAN (Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network) Investigators. Peripheral nerve catheters in children: An analysis of safety and practice patterns from the pediatric regional anesthesia network (PRAN). Br. J. Anaesth. 2015, 115, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeng, C.L.; Torrillo, T.M.; Rosenblatt, M.A. Complications of peripheral nerve blocks. Br. J. Anaesth. 2010, 105, i97–i107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurnaney, H.; Kraemer, F.W.; Maxwell, L.; Muhly, W.T.; Schleelein, L.; Ganesh, A. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children and adolescents: A longitudinal 8-year single center study. Anesth. Analg. 2014, 118, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganesh, A.; Rose, J.B.; Wells, L.; Ganley, T.; Gurnaney, H.; Maxwell, L.G.; DiMaggio, T.; Milovcich, K.; Scollon, M.; Feldman, J.M.; et al. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Inpatient and Outpatient Postoperative Analgesia in Children. Anesth. Analg. 2007, 105, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Visoiu, M.; Joy, L.N.; Grudziak, J.S.; Chelly, J.E. The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents. Pediatr. Anesthesia 2014, 24, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hertz, L.; Sola, C.; De La Arena, P.; Dadure, C. Acute Pain Management in a Child: A Case Report of 46-Days of Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter. Int. J. Anesth. Anesthesiol. 2018, 5, 063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgoyne, L.; Pereiras, L.; Bertani, L.; Kaddoum, R.; Neel, M.; Faughnan, L.; Anghelescu, D. Long-term use of nerve block catheters in pediatric patients with cancer related pathologic fractures. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2012, 40, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fontana, C.; Rocco, M.; Vetrugno, L.; Bignami, E. Long-term placement of continuous popliteal nerve block catheter for management of a wounded patient in a combat field environment: A case report. Local Reg. Anesthesia 2019, 12, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ilfeld, B. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: A review of the published evidence. Anesth. Analg. 2011, 113, 904–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cuvillon, P.; Ripart, J.; Lalourcey, L.; Veyrat, E.; L’hermite, J.; Boisson, C.; Thouabtia, E.; Eledjam, J.J. The Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Catheter for Postoperative Analgesia: Bacterial Colonization, Infectious Rate and Adverse Effects. Anesth. Analg. 2001, 93, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeng, C.; Rosenblatt, M. Overview of Peripheral Nerve Blocks. May 2023. Available online: https://uptodate.com (accessed on 11 May 2023).
- Neuburger, M.; Buttner, J.; Blumenthal, S.; Breitbarth, J.; Borgeat, A. Inflammation and infection complications of 2285 perineural catheters: A prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2007, 51, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capdevila, X.; Brinquier, S.; Borgeat, A. Infectious risk of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Anesthesiology 2009, 110, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hebl, J.R. The importance and implications of aseptic techniques during regional anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2006, 31, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morin, A.M.; Kerwat, K.M.; Klotz, M.; Niestolik, R.; Ruf, V.E.; Wulf, H.; Zimmermann, S.; Eberhart, L.H. Risk factors for bacterial catheter colonization in regional anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferland, C.; Vega, E.; Ingelmo, P. Acute pain management in children: Challenges and recent improvements. Curr. Opin. Anesthesiol. 2010, 31, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suresh, S.; Birmingham, P.; Kozlowski, R. Pediatric pain management. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2012, 30, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mann, T.J.; Orlikowski, C.E.; Gurrin, L.C.; Keil, A.D. The Effect of the Biopatch, a Chlorhexidine Impregnated Dressing, on Bacterial Colonization of Epidural Catheter Exit Sites. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2001, 29, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho, K.M.; Litton, E. Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: A metanalysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeanes, A.; Bitmead, J. Reducing bloodstream infection with a chlorhexidine gel IV dressing. Br. J. Nurs. 2015, 24, S14–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Patient # | Age (Year) | Weight (kg) | ASA * Class | Injury | Surgeries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | 36 | 2 | Degloving of right lateral foot | Repeated irrigation, debridement, wound vacuum changes, and free flap skin graft surgery. |
2 | 4 | 24 | 2 | Lawnmower injury to right lower extremity | Repeated irrigation, debridement, wound vacuum changes, and free flap skin graft surgery. |
3 | 3 | 20 | 2 | Degloving injury from a lawnmower to bilateral lower extremities | Repeated irrigation and debridement, wound vacuum changes |
4 | 3 | 18 | 3 | Right upper extremity amputation from lawnmower | Irrigation and debridement, wound vacuum placement, complete amputation |
5 | 12 | 52 | 1 | Dirt bike injury causing left lower extremity avulsion | Irrigation and debridement |
6 | 6 | 22 | 1 | Bilateral trans metatarsal amputations from lawnmower injury | Repeated irrigation and debridement, wound vacuum placement, and changes |
7 | 4 | 14 | 3 | Lawnmower induced right lower extremity fractures, lacerations, degloving injury | Open reduction and internal fixation, exploration of wound, wound vacuum placement, and changes |
8 | 6 | 21 | 3 | Septic shock leading to extra-corporeal membrane support, complicated with thromboses to bilateral upper extremities | Irrigation and debridement to bilateral upper extremity, skin grafting |
9 | 4 | 18 | 2 | Partial amputation from lawn mower to left lower extremity | Left foot irrigation and debridement, wound vacuum changes |
Patient # | Nerve Block Location | # of Catheters | Duration of Catheters Individually | Total Number of Days with a Catheter in Place | Operating Room Antibiotics | Scheduled Antibiotics | Bio Patch Used | Tunneled Catheter | Catheter Complications | Fevers | Infections |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Right popliteal | 2 | 11, 11 | 22 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | #2 | Leaking day 11 of the first catheter | No | No |
1 | Epidural | 1 | 7 | 7 | Yes | No | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No |
2 | Right femoral | 4 | 11, 8, 4, 10 | 33 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | Leukocytosis |
2 | Right popliteal | 2 | 11, 10 | 21 | Yes | Yes * | Not noted | Not noted | Excoriation and peeling up from dressing on day 6 | No | Leukocytosis |
2 | Right anterior sciatic | 1 | 12 | 12 | Yes | No, but it started during the catheter | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | Leukocytosis |
2 | Epidural | 2 | 8, 6 | 14 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | #1 | None | No | Positive for Clostridium Difficile |
3 | Right popliteal | 3 | 3, 8, 7 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No | |
3 | Left popliteal | 3 | 3, 8, 7 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No | |
3 | Right sciatic | 2 | 13, 10 | 23 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No |
3 | Left sciatic | 2 | 13, 10 | 23 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | Leaking of the second sciatic catheter on day 5, redressed, site clean | No | No |
3 | Epidural | 1 | 8 | 8 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Yes | Redness day 6 at the insertion site, redressed; no abscess, not infected | No | No |
4 | Right supraclavicular | 2 | 7, 3 | 10 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | The second catheter had a loose dressing and was removed early on day 3, and the site was clean. | Yes | No |
4 | Right infraclavicular | 2 | 7, 2 | 9 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | The second catheter had leaked and was removed early; the site was clean. | No | No |
5 | Left popliteal | 1 | 11 | 11 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No |
6 | Left popliteal | 2 | 11, 9 | 20 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | None | No | No |
6 | Right popliteal | 3 | 3, 6, 9 | 18 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | One was accidentally removed, one had an unwitnessed disconnect and removed early, and fever for the third. | Yes | No |
7 | Right femoral | 4 | 3, 15, 2, 3 | 23 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | Patient removed | No | No |
7 | Right sciatic | 4 | 3, 7, 13, 5 | 28 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | Urine, stool contamination; | No | No |
7 | Right lumbar plexus | 2 | 2, 3 | 5 | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Not noted | Leaking, reinforced, removed early, site clean | No | No |
7 | Right popliteal | 1 | 9 | 9 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Urinated, diarrhea | No | No |
8 | Left supraclavicular | 2 | 14, 4 | 18 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | None | Yes | No, leukocytosis, wound infection |
8 | Right supraclavicular | 2 | 14, 7 | 21 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Second removed by accident early, site clean | Yes | No |
9 | Left sciatic | 1 | 9 | 9 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Stool contamination | Yes | No |
9 | Left femoral | 2 | 9, 3 | 12 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | None | No | No |
9 | Left popliteal | 1 | 11 | 11 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not noted | Disconnect/dressing came off, removed, site clean | No | No |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Verdecchia, N.; Praslick, A.; Visoiu, M. Safety Assessment of Prolonged Nerve Catheters in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Case Series Study. Children 2024, 11, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020251
Verdecchia N, Praslick A, Visoiu M. Safety Assessment of Prolonged Nerve Catheters in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Case Series Study. Children. 2024; 11(2):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020251
Chicago/Turabian StyleVerdecchia, Nicole, Alexander Praslick, and Mihaela Visoiu. 2024. "Safety Assessment of Prolonged Nerve Catheters in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Case Series Study" Children 11, no. 2: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020251
APA StyleVerdecchia, N., Praslick, A., & Visoiu, M. (2024). Safety Assessment of Prolonged Nerve Catheters in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Case Series Study. Children, 11(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020251