Next Article in Journal
Effects of a Need-Supportive Motor Skill Intervention on Children’s Motor Skill Competence and Physical Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Fat Mass Index (FMI) as a Trustworthy Overweight and Obesity Marker in Mexican Pediatric Population
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/children7030020
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Post-Cardiotomy Parasternal Nerve Block with Bupivacaine May Be Associated with Reduced Post-Operative Opioid Use in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study

by
Francis X. Moga
1,2,3,*,
Mark D. Lo Galbo
4,
David M. Overman
1,2,3 and
Stefan J. Friedrichsdorf
5,6
1
Children’s Heart Clinic PA, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
2
Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
3
Mayo Clinic-Children’s Minnesota Cardiovascular Collaborative, Rochester/Minneapolis, MN 55905/55404, USA
4
Children’s Research Institute, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
5
Center of Pediatric Pain Medicine, Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine, Benioff Children’s Hospitals in Oakland and San Francisco, University of California at San Francisco UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
6
Department of Pain Medicine, Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2020, 7(3), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/children7030020
Submission received: 22 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 11 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Surgery)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Postoperative pain treatment affects immediate and long-term outcomes in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Opioids, as part of multimodal analgesia, are effective in treating pain, however, they can be disadvantageous due to adverse side effects. Therefore, we assessed whether the local anesthetic bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block in children post-cardiac surgery is an effective adjunct to pain management. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery via median sternotomy at a large children’s hospital between November 2011 and February 2014 with and without bupivacaine following the introduction of perioperative bupivacaine in late 2012 on a single unit. 62 out of 148 patients (age 3–17 years) who received bupivacaine demonstrated decreased postoperative opioid use. Within one day of surgery, patients who received bupivacaine required, on average, 0.57 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.68) of total morphine equivalent compared to 0.93 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.06) for patients who did not receive bupivacaine. This difference was statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders (p-value = 0.002). Length of stay and intubation were shorter on average among patients who received bupivacaine, but these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders. The study results seem to suggest that the perioperative administration of bupivacaine may reduce opioid usage among children post-cardiotomy.

1. Introduction

Pain in hospitalized children remains common, under-assessed, and under-treated, with 24 to 80 percent of hospitalized pediatric patients experiencing moderate to severe pain [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Hospitalized children experiencing severe pain without adequate analgesia show negative long-term consequences, including a higher risk for post-traumatic stress disorder and increased morbidity and mortality [9,10,11,12,13]. Effective pain treatment after cardiac surgery in the pediatric population presents the challenge of balancing effective pain control with limiting opioid-induced side-effects, sedation, and respiratory effects [14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
An effective perioperative pain control regimen not only improves the quality of life of children undergoing open-heart surgery but facilitates the process of early extubation and assists with maintaining stable hemodynamics [14,21]. Following cardiac surgery, significant cerebral, physiological, and behavioral activity is present in response to a noxious procedure in critically ill children despite the administration of analgesic treatment [22]. Opioids, such as morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and methadone (in the UK: Diamorphine), are often a key pillar of effective analgesia but might be associated with side effects including pruritus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression [23,24,25].
Most advanced pediatric cardiac centers now appear to employ the concept of multimodal analgesia, i.e., combining modalities, which act synergistically for more effective (opioid-sparing) pediatric pain control with fewer side effects than a single analgesic or modality [24,26]. Additional mitigating strategies are not well explored in pediatric cardiac surgery and might include the administration of sodium-channel blockers, including perioperative lidocaine as a local anesthetic [27]. Bupivacaine, another local anesthetic agent and sodium-channel blocker most commonly used for epidural, spinal, and caudal anesthesia [28], has been considered as a useful adjunct to postoperative pain management strategies and been found safe to use in children [16]. Studies in adults have shown the use of bupivacaine—either direct application, infusion, or a combination—to reduce pain scores, opioid use, length of intubation, and length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery [29,30,31,32,33].
Two small studies (n = 34 children) reported improved analgesia as a result of continuous local infusion in a post-surgical pediatric population [34,35], but more evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of bupivacaine administered at the surgical site in vulnerable populations such as pediatric cardiac surgery patients. However, analgesic trials pose unique scientific, ethical, and practical challenges in pediatrics [36]. Berde et al. in their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientific report on pediatric analgesic clinical trial designs, measures, and extrapolation recommended using innovative study designs and outcome measures specific for children, including comparing the opioid use in the intervention and control group as a proxy for the efficacy of an analgesic modality [36].
As a result, this retrospective cohort study was undertaken to explore whether the perioperative administration of the local anesthetic bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block might reduce opioid usage among children after cardiotomy on a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

2. Materials and Methods

The protocol for this retrospective cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Children’s Minnesota (IRB #1402-019, Date of Approval 02/25/14); informed consent was not required for a retrospective chart review. Following STROBE guidelines [37], the primary outcome of this observational study was to explore whether the perioperative administration of the local anesthetic bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block might reduce opioid usage among children after cardiotomy on a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether there would have been other clinical differences charted in the electronic medical records, such as pain scores, sedation scores, time to extubation, etc.

2.1. Setting

One of the largest freestanding children’s hospitals in the United States, with 429 staffed beds on 2 campuses and 5 intensive care units. The pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (Cardiovascular Care Center [CVCC]) has 25 beds and performs more than 400 open-heart surgeries annually.

2.2. Intervention

In addition to employing multimodal analgesia, triggered by clinical experience and emerging data [34], 2 cardiac surgeons (FXM, DMO) started in late 2012, administering the local anesthetic bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block in the subject population. Within about 3 months, it was administered to all children expected to be extubated within 24 h. A quantity of 1.0 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine solution without epinephrine was injected into the parasternal nerve bundles under direct vision at the end of the cardiac procedure. This local injection was placed under the intercostal nerves of 5–6 interspaces on each side of the sternotomy.

2.3. Patients

To assess potential clinical outcomes of this change of practice occurring in late 2012, patients prior and post-addition of bupivacaine were included. A chart review was conducted on pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 1 November 2011, and 1 February 2014. Eligible patients were between the ages of 3 and 17 years at the time of surgery, required a median sternotomy, and whose parents or caregivers consented to the general use of their medical information for research. Patients undergoing delayed sternal closure were excluded. Following surgery, all patients were admitted to the CVCC for postoperative care.
Specifically, there were 679 total cardiac cases during this time period, with 254 meeting the age requirement. The case total was verified by using the STS national database, which is an externally verified database. The chart review identified among those who were between 3 and 17 years of age 148 patients who had an initial operation at admission, a median sternotomy, and without ECMO support or further interventions. Those patients who met the study criteria had their information extracted from electronic medical records. Pre-exposure data included demographic information (e.g., gender, race), medical history (i.e., cardiac diagnosis, comorbidities, cardiac physiology), and description of the cardiac procedure (i.e., STAT [Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery]—score mortality category, bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, doses of cardioplegia). The exposure of interest was whether a patient received bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block during surgery (bupivacaine group) or no bupivacaine (control group). Post-operative outcomes included length of intubation and hospital stay following surgery and the daily amount of medications administered.
Current pediatric pain trial recommendations include comparing opioid use in the intervention and control group as a proxy for the efficacy of an analgesic modality [36]. As such, this analysis focused on postoperative analgesic use on the day of and the day following surgery, because previous research with bupivacaine in adults has found that it significantly reduced postoperative pain for at least a 24-h period [29,32,33,38]. Specific analgesics of interest were opioids (i.e., fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine) as well as basic analgesia (the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ketorolac, and acetaminophen). The pharmacological aspect of the multimodal analgesia protocol on the CVCC during the study period included scheduled acetaminophen (initially intravenously, switched to enteral administration) and, if approved by the cardiac surgeon, intravenous ketorolac (switched to enteral ibuprofen or celecoxib). Regarding opioid use, patients most commonly received fentanyl, followed by hydromorphone, and/or morphine. The route of administration on the day of surgery and postoperative day 1 was a continuous opioid infusion plus a nurse- or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus. Starting doses (titrated to effect) were fentanyl 1 mcg/kg/h (max. 50 mcg, plus PCA bolus of 1 mcg/kg), hydromorphone 2–3 mcg/kg/h (max. 100–150 mcg, plus PCA bolus of 2–3 mcg/kg), or morphine 20 mcg/kg/h (max. plus PCA bolus of 20 mcg/kg). If opioid-induced side effects were not manageable by low-dose intravenous naloxone 0.5–2 mcg/kg/h, an opioid rotation was undertaken at equianalgesic doses [39]. The patients were transitioned to oral pain medications as soon as oral intake was safe and well-tolerated.
Daily measurements of pain, sedation, and withdrawal were also recorded (i.e., FLACC, SBS, WAT-1); however, they were excluded from this analysis because of inconsistent reporting into the electronic medical record system.
Based on pediatric opioid equivalent and conversion tables [24,39,40], the amount of intravenous morphine equivalent opioid use was computed and reported in milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/kg).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The analysis was a comparison of the bupivacaine group to the control group. Pre-exposure characteristics were compared in order to assess potential confounding factors. Unadjusted analysis of the post-operative outcomes used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Linear regression models were used to account for differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups and incorporate important prognostic information. Outcome variables were transformed (i.e., log and square root) to satisfy standard regression assumptions, which were checked via diagnostic plots. Wald tests were used to test associations with the use of bupivacaine, adjusting for potential confounders. Both adjusted and unadjusted estimates of within-group averages were reported on the original scale. Adjusted estimates of transformed outcomes were back-transformed under standard regression assumptions; standard errors and confidence intervals were calculated via the bootstrap procedure.
Sensitivity analyses were performed. One compared different formulas for computing the amount of morphine equivalent (including adult opioid conversion tables) in order to ensure results were not dependent on the opioid used. Additional sensitivity analyses examined the impact of outliers. No specific subgroups or interactions were examined because an analysis of effect modification was beyond the scope of this study.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Of the 148 patients identified, 62 were administered bupivacaine during surgery, with the practice change starting in late 2012: In Nov-Dec 2011 n = 0/8 (0%) children received bupivacaine, in 2012 n = 11/88 (12.5%), in 2013 n = 46/57 (81%), and in January 2014 n = 5/5 (100%). The bupivacaine and control groups had similar ages, and the majority were white/non-Hispanic. The bupivacaine group had a higher percentage of females (p = 0.008, see Table 1). Both groups had typical BMI values for their age and sex and had a variety of cardiac diagnoses (see Table 2). Patients in the control group had more comorbidities than the bupivacaine group (p < 0.001, see Table 3). The two groups were similar with respect to intraoperative summaries. A majority of the procedures had STAT mortality category values of 1 or 2 (see Table 4). No changes to the anesthetic technique were noted during the time period of the study.

3.2. Opioid Use

As expected, patients received the most morphine or opioid equivalent, both overall/total (continuous infusion of opioids and nurse- or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) combined) and exclusively via nurse- or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-pumps, on the day of surgery and the following day, and usage dropped off quickly in subsequent days (see Figure 1). The largest difference in the amount of morphine equivalent used between the bupivacaine and control groups occurred during this initial spike in use. Over the course of the day of surgery and the following day, on average, the bupivacaine group used 0.57 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.68) of total morphine equivalent compared to 0.93 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.06) in the control group (see Table 5). On average, 0.34 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.41) versus 0.45 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.53) was PCA morphine equivalent use in the bupivacaine and control groups, respectively (see Table 5). This represented a 38% reduction of morphine equivalent use within one day of surgery, and these differences were statistically significant after adjusting for prognostic and potential confounding factors. As expected, the use of acetaminophen and ketorolac (since part of scheduled dosing protocol) were not associated with the use of bupivacaine (see Table 6). There was no significant difference in length of time in regards to PCA administration with the median length of PCA administration for both bupivacaine and control groups being 1.5 days (IQR for bupivacaine group was 0.93–1.84 while IQR for the control group was 0.95–2.26). Table 5 and Table 6 show the total morphine equivalent (all opioids administered by any route) and PCA morphine equivalent (opioids administered intravenously by PCA bolus only).

3.3. Time to Extubation

Patients in the bupivacaine group were intubated for 5.8 h (95% confidence interval, 4.0 to 7.5) following surgery compared to 8.9 h (95% confidence interval, 6.8 to 11.1) within the control group. This difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors using linear regression models (see Table 6). Two patients who were intubated for over 100 h were excluded for analysis of intubation length. Both groups stayed in the hospital for an additional 6–7 days following surgery (see Table 6).

4. Discussion

An effective perioperative pain control regimen not only improves the quality of life of children undergoing open-heart surgery but also advances their clinical outcomes [14,21]. The less effective the postoperative pain treatment, the worse the immediate and long-term outcomes: A 10% increase in time spent in severe pain on postoperative day 1 resulted in a 30% increase of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) incidence at 12 months [41]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a prevalence of CPSP in children across studies of 20% at 12 months after surgery [42]. Opioids continue to be the most effective analgesics and are frequently part of a postoperative pain protocol but might simultaneously be associated with significant dose-limiting side effects [23,24,25].
Multi-modal analgesia, i.e., combining modalities that act synergistically for more effective (opioid-sparing) pediatric pain control with fewer side effects than single analgesic or modality, is now the key approach in treating and preventing pain after cardiac surgery [24,26]. Multimodal analgesia post-cardiac surgery may include pharmacology such as (1) simple analgesia, e.g., acetaminophen, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSAIDs (or, if bleeding risk COX-2 inhibitor), (2) opioids, and (3) adjuvant analgesia, e.g., alpha-agonists [26] (dexmedetomidine, clonidine), gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin), NMDA-channel blockers (ketamine, the opioid methadone) may be combined with (4) regional anesthesia (e.g., neuroaxial infusion [epidural], peripheral/plexus nerve block, neurolytic block, intrathecal port/pump), (5) rehabilitation (e.g., physical therapy, graded motor imagery [43], occupational therapy), and, depending on the age of the child, (6) psychology (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy), (7) spirituality (e.g., chaplain) and (8) integrative (“non-pharmacological”) modalities (e.g., mind-body techniques such as diaphragmatic breathing, bubble blowing, self-hypnosis, progressive muscle relaxation, biofeedback plus massage, aromatherapy, acupressure, acupuncture) [24,44,45].
This retrospective cohort study, exploring the practice change occurring on a large pediatric cardiac intensive care unit, seems to suggest that the perioperative administration of the local anesthetic bupivacaine as a parasternal nerve block may reduce opioid usage among children following cardiotomy.
There is limited evidence regarding the perioperative use of sodium-channel blockers in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. One recent study by Mattila et al. in 49 children aged 1–9 years could not demonstrate that a continuous ropivacaine wound infusion reduced morphine consumption, pain score or values, or nausea and vomiting in children who underwent atrium septum defect closure with median sternotomy and mediastinal drain [46]. One adult study on a continuous infusion of ropivacaine into the sternal wound following cardiac surgery was discontinued early due to an increased incidence of sternal wound infection [47]. In a pediatric randomized controlled study (RCT) with 72 children aged 3 months to 16 years undergoing a median sternotomy incision, a continuous incisional infusion of 0.25% levobupivacaine or bupivacaine reduced postoperative analgesic requirements and sedative use [35]. A small RCT in 30 children undergoing cardiac surgery with a median sternotomy receiving a 0.5% ropivacaine injection with 5 doses of 0.5 to 2.0 mL on each side in the 2nd to 6th parasternal intercostal spaces with a total dose of ropivacaine below 5 mg/kg or the same volume of saline before sternal wound closure resulted in lower opioid administration, lower pain scores, and earlier extubation [34]. Levobupivacaine and bupivacaine have rather similar pharmacological profiles [48], although research on bupivacaine alone in a pediatric setting is limited. Our cohort study adds to the body of pediatric literature that perioperative sodium-channel blockers, such as bupivacaine, are opioid-sparing postoperatively.

5. Study Limitations

Limitations of this study stem from collecting observational data from a retrospective open-enrollment cohort. A clinical practice change occurred in late 2012 with the addition of perioperative bupivacaine administration, and the majority of the control group consists of children prior to this point in time, as well as a few children who were not expected to be extubated within 24 h. As such, there are differences in terms of comorbidities and gender. An adjusted analysis accounting for these observed differences and other prognostic factors attempted to control for these differences. However, there may be other potential confounding factors that were not measured, and that might explain the observed associations. We were unable to account for daily measurements of pain and sedation via commonly used instruments (e.g., FLACC), due to inconsistent reporting. Clinicians in this study charged with managing patient pain post-surgery were not blinded to the use of a parasternal nerve block. This information may have influenced their decision to provide certain types and amounts of analgesics. However, the opioid analgesia was patient- or nurse-administered, and it appears less likely that the knowledge of a perioperative block may have influenced analgesia administration.

6. Conclusions

Despite the use of multi-modal analgesia, adequate pain treatment and prevention after pediatric cardiac surgery continues to represent the challenge of balancing effective pain control with limiting opioid-induced side-effects, sedation, and respiratory effects [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Additional evidence regarding analgesic modalities to improve immediate postoperative and long-term outcomes is needed. Our findings add to the body of literature and seem to suggest that bupivacaine for a parasternal nerve block in pediatric patients following cardiac surgery might be an advantageous adjunct in the post-surgical multi-modal pain management. Prospective, double-blinded pediatric RCTs would be required to support or refute the results of this retrospective open-label cohort study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design, F.X.M.; methodology, F.X.M.; interpretation of study findings, F.X.M., M.D.L.G., D.M.O., and S.J.F.; writing—original draft preparation and review and editing, F.X.M., M.D.L.G., D.M.O., and S.J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Friedrichsdorf, S.J.; Postier, A.; Eull, D.; Weidner, C.; Foster, L.; Gilbert, M.; Campbell, F. Pain Outcomes in a US Children’s Hospital: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Survey. Hosp. Pediatr. 2015, 5, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Groenewald, C.B.; Rabbitts, J.A.; Schroeder, D.R.; Harrison, T.E. Prevalence of moderate-severe pain in hospitalized children. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2012, 22, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harrison, D.; Joly, C.; Chretien, C.; Cochrane, S.; Ellis, J.; Lamontagne, C.; Vaillancourt, R. Pain prevalence in a pediatric hospital: Raising awareness during Pain Awareness Week. Pain Res. Manag. 2014, 19, e24–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kozlowski, L.J.; Kost-Byerly, S.; Colantuoni, E.; Thompson, C.B.; Vasquenza, K.J.; Rothman, S.K.; Billett, C.; White, E.D.; Yaster, M.; Monitto, C.L. Pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a hospitalized pediatric population. Pain Manag. Nurs. 2014, 15, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Postier, A.C.; Eull, D.; Schulz, C.; Fitzgerald, M.; Symalla, B.; Watson, D.; Goertzen, L.; Friedrichsdorf, S.J. Pain Experience in a US Children’s Hospital: A Point Prevalence Survey Undertaken After the Implementation of a System-Wide Protocol to Eliminate or Decrease Pain Caused by Needles. Hosp. Pediatr. 2018, 8, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shomaker, K.; Dutton, S.; Mark, M. Pain Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in a US Children’s Hospital. Hosp. Pediatr. 2015, 5, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Strohbuecker, B.; Mayer, H.; Evers, G.C.; Sabatowski, R. Pain prevalence in hospitalized patients in a German university teaching hospital. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2005, 29, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walther-Larsen, S.; Pedersen, M.T.; Friis, S.M.; Aagaard, G.B.; Romsing, J.; Jeppesen, E.M.; Friedrichsdorf, S.J. Pain prevalence in hospitalized children: A prospective cross-sectional survey in four Danish university hospitals. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2017, 61, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anand, K.J.; Barton, B.A.; McIntosh, N.; Lagercrantz, H.; Pelausa, E.; Young, T.E.; Vasa, R. Analgesia and sedation in preterm neonates who require ventilatory support: Results from the NOPAIN trial. Neonatal Outcome and Prolonged Analgesia in Neonates. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999, 153, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nixon, R.D.; Nehmy, T.J.; Ellis, A.A.; Ball, S.A.; Menne, A.; McKinnon, A.C. Predictors of posttraumatic stress in children following injury: The influence of appraisals, heart rate, and morphine use. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saxe, G.; Stoddard, F.; Courtney, D.; Cunningham, K.; Chawla, N.; Sheridan, R.; King, D.; King, L. Relationship between acute morphine and the course of PTSD in children with burns. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2001, 40, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Stoddard, F.J., Jr.; Sorrentino, E.A.; Ceranoglu, T.A.; Saxe, G.; Murphy, J.M.; Drake, J.E.; Ronfeldt, H.; White, G.W.; Kagan, J.; Snidman, N.; et al. Preliminary evidence for the effects of morphine on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in one- to four-year-olds with burns. J. Burn Care Res. 2009, 30, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Taddio, A.; Katz, J.; Ilersich, A.L.; Koren, G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet 1997, 349, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Barr, A.M.; Tutungi, E.; Almeida, A.A. Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for pain management after cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2007, 21, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. El-Morsy, G.Z.; El-Deeb, A.; El-Desouky, T.; Elsharkawy, A.A.; Elgamal, M.A. Can thoracic paravertebral block replace thoracic epidural block in pediatric cardiac surgery? A randomized blinded study. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2012, 15, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Golianu, B.; Hammer, G.B. Pain management for pediatric thoracic surgery. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2005, 18, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nasr, D.A.; Abdelhamid, H.M. The efficacy of caudal dexmedetomidine on stress response and postoperative pain in pediatric cardiac surgery. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2013, 16, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Penk, J.S.; Lefaiver, C.A.; Brady, C.M.; Steffensen, C.M.; Wittmayer, K. Intermittent Versus Continuous and Intermittent Medications for Pain and Sedation After Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery; A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pietropaoli, J.A.; Jr Keller, M.S.; Smail, D.F.; Abajian, J.C.; Kreutz, J.M.; Vane, D.W. Regional anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Complications and postoperative comfort level in 174 children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1993, 28, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Van der Marel, C.D.; Peters, J.W.; Bouwmeester, N.J.; Jacqz-Aigrain, E.; van den Anker, J.N.; Tibboel, D. Rectal acetaminophen does not reduce morphine consumption after major surgery in young infants. Br. J. Anaesth. 2007, 98, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cheng, D.C. Regional analgesia and ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Can. J. Anaesth. 2005, 52, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ranger, M.; Celeste Johnston, C.; Rennick, J.E.; Limperopoulos, C.; Heldt, T.; du Plessis, A.J. A multidimensional approach to pain assessment in critically ill infants during a painful procedure. Clin. J. Pain 2013, 29, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chidambaran, V.; Sadhasivam, S.; Mahmoud, M. Codeine and opioid metabolism: Implications and alternatives for pediatric pain management. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2017, 30, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Friedrichsdorf, S.J. Prevention and Treatment of Pain in Hospitalized Infants, Children, and Teenagers: From Myths and Morphine to Multimodal Analgesia. In Pain 2016: Refresher Courses 16th World Congress on Pain; International Association for the Study of Pain, IASP Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 309–319. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sadhasivam, S.; Myer, C.M., III. Preventing opioid-related deaths in children undergoing surgery. Pain Med. 2012, 13, 982–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Horvath, R.; Halbrooks, E.F.; Overman, D.M.; Friedrichsdorf, S.J. Efficacy and safety of postoperative dexmedetomidine administration in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study. J. Pediatr. Intensive Care 2015, 4, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bailey, M.; Corcoran, T.; Schug, S.; Toner, A. Perioperative lidocaine infusions for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. Pain 2018, 159, 1696–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paganelli, M.A.; Popescu, G.K. Actions of bupivacaine, a widely used local anesthetic, on NMDA receptor responses. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chiu, K.M.; Wu, C.C.; Wang, M.J.; Lu, C.W.; Shieh, J.S.; Lin, T.Y.; Chu, S.H. Local infusion of bupivacaine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia provides better pain relief than intravenous patient-controlled analgesia alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008, 135, 1348–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chopra, A.; Hurren, J.; Szpunar, S.; Edwin, S.B. Assessment of Postoperative Pain Control with an Elastomeric Pain Pump Following Cardiothoracic Surgery. Pain Med. 2017, 18, 1450–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deneuville, M.; Bisserier, A.; Regnard, J.F.; Chevalier, M.; Levasseur, P.; Herve, P. Continuous intercostal analgesia with 0.5% bupivacaine after thoracotomy: A randomized study. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993, 55, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nasr, D.A.; Abdelhamid, H.M.; Mohsen, M.; Aly, A.H. The analgesic efficacy of continuous presternal bupivacaine infusion through a single catheter after cardiac surgery. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2015, 18, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. White, P.F.; Rawal, S.; Latham, P.; Markowitz, S.; Issioui, T.; Chi, L.; Dellaria, S.; Shi, C.; Morse, L.; Ing, C. Use of a continuous local anesthetic infusion for pain management after median sternotomy. Anesthesiology 2003, 99, 918–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhary, V.; Chauhan, S.; Choudhury, M.; Kiran, U.; Vasdev, S.; Talwar, S. Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2012, 26, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tirotta, C.F.; Munro, H.M.; Salvaggio, J.; Madril, D.; Felix, D.E.; Rusinowski, L.; Tyler, C.; Decampli, W.; Hannan, R.L.; Burke, R.P. Continuous incisional infusion of local anesthetic in pediatric patients following open heart surgery. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2009, 19, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berde, C.B.; Walco, G.A.; Krane, E.J.; Anand, K.J.; Aranda, J.V.; Craig, K.D.; Dampier, C.D.; Finkel, J.C.; Grabois, M.; Johnston, C.; et al. Pediatric analgesic clinical trial designs, measures, and extrapolation: Report of an FDA scientific workshop. Pediatrics 2012, 129, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vandenbroucke, J.P.; von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Pocock, S.J.; Poole, C.; Schlesselman, J.J.; Egger, M.; Initiative, S. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Saeidi, M.; Aghadavoudi, O.; Sadeghi, M.M.; Mansouri, M. The efficacy of preventive parasternal single injection of bupivacaine on intubation time, blood gas parameters, narcotic requirement, and pain relief after open heart surgery: A randomized clinical trial study. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2011, 16, 477–483. [Google Scholar]
  39. Friedrichsdorf, S.J. From Coke to Pepsi to Mountain Dew? Rotating Opioids in Advanced Pediatric Palliative Care. AAHPM Winter Quart. Clin. Pearls 2014, 15, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schechter, N.; Berde, C.; Yaster, M. Appendix Table 2: Opioid analgesic initial dose guidelines. In Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents; Schechter, N., Berde, C., Yaster, M., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2003; p. 850. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fletcher, D.; Stamer, U.M.; Pogatzki-Zahn, E.; Zaslansky, R.; Tanase, N.V.; Perruchoud, C.; Kranke, P.; Komann, M.; Lehman, T.; Meissner, W.; et al. Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: An observational study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2015, 32, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rabbitts, J.A.; Fisher, E.; Rosenbloom, B.N.; Palermo, T.M. Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pain 2017, 18, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramsey, L.H.; Karlson, C.W.; Collier, A.B. Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain in a 7-Year-Old Male with Osteosarcoma. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2017, 53, e5–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bignami, E.; Castella, A.; Pota, V.; Saglietti, F.; Scognamiglio, A.; Trumello, C.; Pace, M.C.; Allegri, M. Perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery: A systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018, 84, 488–503. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Chou, R.; Gordon, D.B.; de Leon-Casasola, O.A.; Rosenberg, J.M.; Bickler, S.; Brennan, T.; Carter, T.; Cassidy, C.L.; Chittenden, E.H.; Degenhardt, E.; et al. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J. Pain 2016, 17, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mattila, I.; Patila, T.; Rautiainen, P.; Korpela, R.; Nikander, S.; Puntila, J.; Salminen, J.; Suominen, P.K.; Tynkkynen, P.; Hiller, A. The effect of continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine on postoperative pain after median sternotomy and mediastinal drain in children. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2016, 26, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Agarwal, S.; Nuttall, G.A.; Johnson, M.E.; Hanson, A.C.; Oliver, W.C., Jr. A prospective, randomized, blinded study of continuous ropivacaine infusion in the median sternotomy incision following cardiac surgery. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2013, 38, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Foster, R.H.; Markham, A. Levobupivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs 2000, 59, 551–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Children 07 00020 g001 550
Figure 1. Change in the amount of pain medication administered for the first 5 postoperative days.
Figure 1. Change in the amount of pain medication administered for the first 5 postoperative days.
Children 07 00020 g001
Table
Table 1. Patient demographic information.
Table 1. Patient demographic information.
Bupivacaine (n = 62) n (%) *Control (n = 86) n (%) *p-Value
Age (Year)
Mean (SD)8.3 (4.5)9.1 (4.7)0.288
Sex
Female41 (66)45 (52)0.008 a
Race
Non-Hispanic White45 (73)59 (69)0.762
Black7 (11)9 (10)
Other, unknown or declined10 (16)18 (21)
BMI
Age and sex adjusted z- mean (SD)0.1 (1.5)−0.2 (1.4)0.217
Year of surgery
2011–201211 (18)75 (87)<0.001 a
2013–201451 (82)11 (13)
* Unless indicated otherwise. a Significant difference between the two groups at α = 0.05 level SD: Standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Patient clinical information (cardiac surgical diagnosis).
Table 2. Patient clinical information (cardiac surgical diagnosis).
Bupivacaine (n = 62) n (%) *Control (n = 86) n (%) *p-Value
Pulmonary valve repair/replacement **20 (32)35 (41)N/A
Mitral valve repair/replacement **8 (13)3 (3)
Tricuspid valve repair/replacement **5 (8)13 (15)
Aortic valve repair/replacement **8 (13)21 (24)
Atrial septal defect repair/closure **13 (21)13 (15)
Ventricular septal defect repair/closure **3 (5)10 (12)
Patent foramen ovale repair/closure **9 (15)15 (17)
Anomalous coronary artery repair **4 (6)6 (7)
Fontan procedure **10 (16)7 (8)
Pulmonary artery procedure **9 (15)14 (16)
Right ventricular muscle bundle resection **6 (10)8 (9)
Pacemaker procedure **4 (6)5 (6)
Other procedure **15 (24)22 (26)
Fontan Physiology
Yes11 (18)8 (9)0.206
* Unless indicated otherwise. ** Patients can have multiple interventions.
Table
Table 3. Patient clinical information (comorbidities).
Table 3. Patient clinical information (comorbidities).
Bupivacaine (n = 62) n (%) *Control (n = 86) n (%) *p-Value
None42 (68)33 (38)<0.001 a
Genetic- any **6 (10)18 (21)0.075
Genetic- type
Down Syndrome3 (5)5 (6)
DiGeorge Syndrome1 (2)3 (3)
Noonan Syndrome0 (0)1 (1)
Marfan Syndrome1 (2)0 (0)
Other1 (2)9 (10)
Respiratory **9 (15)12 (14)1
Neurological, developmental or psychological **7 (11)24 (28)0.015 a
Endocrine **1 (2)2 (2)1
Musculoskeletal **2 (3)4 (5)1
Renal or Urinary **1 (2)4 (5)0.4
Gastrointestinal **1 (2)5 (6)0.401
Hematologic/Lymphatic **1 (2)8 (9)0.08
Other **2 (3)10 (12)0.075
* Unless indicated otherwise. ** Patients can have multiple comorbidities. a Significant difference between the two groups at α = 0.05 level.
Table
Table 4. Patient operative information.
Table 4. Patient operative information.
Bupivacaine (n = 62) n (%) *Control (n = 86) n (%) *p-Value
STAT Category 0.569
120 (32)22 (26)
228 (45)37 (43)
312 (19)24 (28)
41 (2)3 (3)
Missing1 (2)0 (0)
Aortic Cross Clamp Time 0.317
Minutes- mean (SD)49 (37)55 (36)
Missing12 (19)8 (9)
Bypass Time 0.422
Minutes- mean (SD)70 (39)82 (52)
Missing1 (2)1 (1)
Cardioplegia 0.090
Doses- mean (SD)1.5 (0.8)1.8 (1.0)
Missing12 (19)8 (9)
* Unless indicated otherwise SD: Standard deviation STAT: Society of Thoracic Surgeons—European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Table
Table 5. Outcome characteristics (unadjusted analysis).
Table 5. Outcome characteristics (unadjusted analysis).
Bupivacaine (n = 62)Control (n = 86)Differencep-Value
Total Morphine Equivalent, days 0–1 (mg/kg)0.57 (0.46, 0.68)0.93 (0.80, 1.06)−0.36 (−0.53, 0.19)<0.001 a
PCA Morphine Equivalent, days 0–1 (mg/kg)0.34 (0.27, 0.41)0.45 (0.37, 0.53)−0.11 (−0.21, 0.01)0.049 a
Acetaminophen, days 0–1 (mg/kg)62 (56, 67)55 (50, 60)7 (−1, 14)0.120
Ketorolac, days 0–1 (mg/kg)1.2 (1.0, 1.5)1.5 (1.2, 1.7)−0.2 (−0.6, 0.1)0.235
Length of intubation (hours) *5.8 (4.0, 7.5)8.9 (6.8, 11.1)−3.1 (−5.9, −0.4)0.004 a
Length of hospital stay, post-surgery (days)6.8 (5.6, 7.9)7.1 (5.7, 8.5)−0.3 (−2.1, 1.5)0.775
Data presented as estimated mean (95% confidence interval). * 2 control patients were excluded because intubation length > 100 h. a Significant difference between the two groups at α = 0.05 level. PCA: Patient-Controlled Analgesia.
Table
Table 6. Outcome characteristics (adjusted analysis).
Table 6. Outcome characteristics (adjusted analysis).
Bupivacaine (n = 61)Control (n = 86)Differencep-Value
Total Morphine Equivalent, days 0–1 (mg/kg)0.57 (0.46, 0.69)0.92 (0.78, 1.05)−0.34 (−0.54, −0.14)0.002 a
PCA Morphine Equivalent, days 0–1 (mg/kg)0.30 (0.24, 0.36)0.48 (0.40, 0.56)−0.18 (−0.30, 0.07)0.005 a
Acetaminophen, days 0–1 (mg/kg)56 (50, 63)59 (54, 64)−3 (−12, 7)0.607
Ketorolac, days 0–1 (mg/kg)1.5 (1.2, 1.8)1.3 (1.0, 1.5)0.2 (−0.2, 0.6)0.442
Length of intubation (hours) *5.6 (4.3, 6.9)7.8 (6.0, 9.6)−2.2 (−4.6, 0.2)0.069
Length of hospital stay, post-surgery (days)6.1 (5.3, 6.9)6.9 (5.9, 7.8)−0.7 (−2.0, 0.6)0.291
Data presented as estimated mean (95% confidence interval). * 2 control patients were excluded because intubation length > 100 h. a Significant difference between the two groups at α = 0.05 level. PCA: Patient-Controlled Analgesia. Please note: For all of these outcomes the linear regression models adjusted for age, age squared, race (white, not white), comorbidities (genetic, respiratory, neurological, and other), STAT category (1, 2, 3/4), and year of surgery (2011/2012, 2013/2014) as potential confounders; 1 patient was excluded due to a missing STAT category. For the total morphine equivalent and PCA morphine equivalent outcomes, the analysis was performed after square root transformation. For the length of intubation and hospital stay outcomes, the analysis was performed after log transformation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moga, F.X.; Lo Galbo, M.D.; Overman, D.M.; Friedrichsdorf, S.J. Post-Cardiotomy Parasternal Nerve Block with Bupivacaine May Be Associated with Reduced Post-Operative Opioid Use in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Children 2020, 7, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7030020

AMA Style

Moga FX, Lo Galbo MD, Overman DM, Friedrichsdorf SJ. Post-Cardiotomy Parasternal Nerve Block with Bupivacaine May Be Associated with Reduced Post-Operative Opioid Use in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Children. 2020; 7(3):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7030020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moga, Francis X., Mark D. Lo Galbo, David M. Overman, and Stefan J. Friedrichsdorf. 2020. "Post-Cardiotomy Parasternal Nerve Block with Bupivacaine May Be Associated with Reduced Post-Operative Opioid Use in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study" Children 7, no. 3: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7030020

APA Style

Moga, F. X., Lo Galbo, M. D., Overman, D. M., & Friedrichsdorf, S. J. (2020). Post-Cardiotomy Parasternal Nerve Block with Bupivacaine May Be Associated with Reduced Post-Operative Opioid Use in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Children, 7(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7030020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop