Disclosure of Spousal Death to Patients with Dementia: Attitude and Actual Behavior of Care Managers
1
Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
2
General Practice Department, Chichibu Municipal Hospital, Chichibu 3680025, Japan
3
Division of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13(2), 419-428; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020031
Submission received: 15 December 2022
/
Revised: 18 January 2023
/
Accepted: 7 February 2023
/
Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education: 10th Anniversary)
Abstract
:As the number of dementia patients increases, there is a need to protect patients’ right to know. However, in reality, there are cases in Japan where spouses’ deaths are concealed from patients. We conducted a questionnaire survey of care managers (CMs) to obtain their attitude and actual behavior regarding the disclosure of a spouse’s death to patients with dementia. A self-administered, anonymous questionnaire survey was implemented at academic meetings attended by CMs from March to December 2019, inquiring about experiences with spousal deaths of patients with dementia, disclosure rates, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, and depression. Over 80% had experienced the spousal death of a patient with dementia; the percentage of CMs who had implemented the disclosures varied widely. About 18% had experienced worsening behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and 26% had worsening depression as a result of the disclosure. About 83% of respondents were positive about disclosure, but about 44% did so less than 50% of the time. This study is the first to reveal the current state of CMs’ policies and behaviors regarding the disclosure of spousal death to patients with dementia in Japan. Family members’ wishes and the possibility of BPSD put a relatively large number of caregivers in a dilemma regarding disclosure.
1. Introduction
Currently, there are approximately 50 million people with dementia worldwide, and the number is expected to increase to 150 million by 2050 [1]. Human rights issues related to people with dementia are therefore attracting attention [2]. One ethical question that arises is whether care workers should lie to people with dementia [3,4,5,6,7,8]; for example, what should a care worker do if a dementia patient forgets about the death of a close relative [9]? In Japan, there are cases where those with dementia are not informed that their spouse has died. Thus, a careful examination regarding whether this practice is appropriate must be conducted [10].
There are several benefits of knowing that a spouse has died. First, there is a right to information. This leads to treating people with dementia as respectful and autonomous personalities. Second, people with dementia can attend the funeral if they wish. This would aid the adjustment to loss and thereby mitigate confusion about spousal absence. Conversely, there are disadvantages to disclosing a spouse’s death to people with dementia, which may be the most painful event in their lives. People with dementia have impaired memories and can forget things, even if they are informed. In that case, the person may experience distress about the death of their spouse repeatedly. Additionally, the disclosure may cause psychological stress and worsen the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), the symptoms of disturbed perception, the thought content, the mood, or the behavior that frequently occur in patients with dementia [11,12,13]. In addition, people with dementia are at a high risk for depression [14,15,16], and the information about their spouse’s death could cause them to develop depression and develop suicidal ideation [17,18]. Due to these concerns, the family may not wish to disclose the death of a spouse to the person with dementia. In these situations, care workers for an individual with dementia often hesitate to persuade their family to disclose the information about the spouse’s death. This problem should be addressed as a human rights issue for people with dementia, especially as the number of dementia patients is increasing rapidly. While disclosing spousal death may be justified from the perspective of respecting the autonomy and the right to know of the patient with dementia, it cannot be justified from the principle of non-maleficence. This forms an ethical dilemma in which the two ethical principles and values of respect for autonomy and non-maleficence are incompatible.
In Japan, a long-term care system centered on care managers (CM) has been established. CM is a national certification under the Long-Term Care Insurance Act [19]. CMs make care plans for individuals over 65 based on the Long-Term Care Insurance Law and support their lives at home and in institutions. In general, people with dementia have CMs assigned to them. The CM visits their home at least once a month and consults with them and their family about any problems with their care. Therefore, when the spouse of a person with dementia dies, the family often consults with the CM before telling the individual with dementia [20]. The CM is, therefore, the key person who decides whether or not a spousal death is disclosed to a person with dementia. Studies have examined how to counsel people with dementia about the death of their close relatives [21] and the legitimacy of lying to dementia patients in clinical practice [22,23].
In this study, we conducted cross-sectional research targeting care managers. The purpose of this study is to clarify CMs’ attitudes toward the disclosure of a spouse’s death for people with dementia and to investigate related factors. This survey is considered the first step toward formulating guidelines to address the disclosure issues that the care environment for dementia patients, including those requiring care management, is expected to face. The establishment of such guidelines can lead to the creation of a better care environment for dementia patients, including requiring care management, and thereby improve their well-being in the future.
2. Methods
2.1. Questionnaire
The research was conducted with CMs who voluntarily participated in an academic conference and workshop in Japan from March 2019 to December 2019. Research participation request forms and questionnaires were distributed to the CMs and were collected after they were completed. The CMs were informed that there were no benefits or disadvantages based on the completion of the research and that answers were completely anonymous.
A draft of a questionnaire was developed in consultation with ethics experts based on the experience of the clinicians. In order to refine the draft of the questionnaire, a pilot study was conducted with three clinicians and 24 CMs. The pilot study was conducted to obtain expert opinions on the content validity, and the results were used only to improve the questionnaire items.
Thus, the questionnaire items included demographic information, such as sex, age, years of service, and qualifications (senior CM, certified CM). Subsequently, participants were asked about their experience with spousal death for people with dementia, including the number of cases they had experienced, the percentage of cases they had disclosed (0–100%, in 10% increments), and whether they had experienced cases of worsening BPSD and depression after disclosure. These factors were most frequently expressed as concerns by the care managers in the pilot survey. Regarding the worsening of BPSD and the development of depression after disclosure, we defined these as adverse events that affected care, regardless of whether or not there was a medical diagnosis. Ensuingly, we investigated their attitude toward spousal death disclosure (should be disclosed, better to disclose, no need to disclose, better to not disclose) and asked what they consider to be a high priority in considering the issue of spousal death disclosure for people with dementia. We also inquired how far along in the progression of dementia they would prefer to be disclosed, i.e., whether there is a limit in dementia severity after which they would not disclose, based on the functional assessment staging of Alzheimer’s disease (FAST) classification [24].
Furthermore, we investigated what CMs advise for families that do not wish to disclose spousal death (non-intervention, reconsideration of disclosure, recommend disclosing) as well as what actions they themselves take in this scenario (consult with a colleague’s care manager and an attending physician, hold a multidisciplinary conference, do not consult).
2.2. Analysis
First, descriptive statistics on the participants’ basic attributes and experiences with spousal deaths of patients with dementia, as well as their attitude and actual behavior regarding disclosure, were calculated.
Next, according to their attitude toward spousal death disclosure, the participants were classified into two groups: a pro-disclosure group for “should be disclosed” and “better to disclose” and an anti-disclosure group for “no need to disclose” and “better to not disclose.” Similarly, participants were classified into two groups, a low disclosure rate group and high disclosure rate group, based on the median value of the ratio of disclosure implementation. The consistency between the attitude toward disclosure and the disclosure rate was examined for those with an experience in cases involving the spousal death of people with dementia.
Finally, Fisher’s exact test was conducted to examine the difference between the group who thought they should be disclosed but were not disclosed and the group who thought they should be disclosed and did so, focusing on the pro-disclosure group.
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo School of Medicine (2018150NI).
3. Results
The questionnaires were distributed to 707 CMs at academic conferences and workshops. The recovery rate was 72.6%, with 513 participants. A total of 5 participants did not agree with the study and were therefore excluded, leaving a total of 508 participants.
Descriptive statistics of the participants’ demographics and their experience in cases involving the spousal death of people with dementia are shown in Table 1. The participants were predominantly women, with 80% in their 50s. More than 70% had more than 10 years of experience as a CM, and about 80% were qualified as senior CMs. Over 80% of the participants had experienced the spousal death of a patient with dementia. However, the percentage of those who disclosed the death of the patient’s spouse was relatively evenly distributed, ranging from 0% to 100%. Furthermore, among those who did disclose the information, nearly 20% experienced a worsening of the patient’s BPSD as a result of the disclosure, and nearly 30% experienced a worsening depression in the patient with dementia.
Descriptive statistics on participants’ attitudes and actual behaviors regarding disclosure are shown in Table 2. Regarding the attitude toward disclosure, “should be disclosed” and “better to disclose,” which are categorized in the pro-disclosure group, accounted for about 83% of the participants, and most of the subjects were positive about disclosure. Nearly half of the participants cited the person’s right to know and the family’s intention as priorities when considering the issue of disclosure, and about a quarter cited the person’s personality, the degree of progression of dementia, and the presence or absence of depression. When asked about the level of progression of dementia, over 40% of the respondents answered that the patient should be informed regardless of the level of progression, even if the patient is bedridden or unable to speak. However, the remaining nearly 60% thought that the level of dementia severity should be taken into account in deciding whether to disclose or not. When the patient’s family expressed the wish to not disclose, “non-intervention” and “reconsideration of disclosure” were selected by nearly 40% of the respondents. However, about 15% of the participants also responded “recommend disclosing” or “persuade to disclose.” Most of the respondents also consulted with other staff members, such as colleague CMs, the patient’s attending physician, and multi-professional conferences, but nearly 10% said the respondents never consulted with other staff members.
Table 3 shows the consistency between the attitude toward disclosure and the disclosure rate for those who had experienced the spousal death of a patient with dementia. In the pro-disclosure group, about 44% were in the low disclosure rate group with an actual disclosure rate of 50% or less, while only about 17% were in the anti-disclosure group with an actual disclosure rate of 60% or more. The pro-disclosure group showed a larger discrepancy between the attitude toward disclosure and the actual disclosure rate.
Focusing only on the pro-disclosure group, Table 4 shows the results of a comparison between the low disclosure rate group (≤50%) and the high disclosure rate group (≥60%) in terms of participants’ demographics, experience with the spousal death of a patient with dementia, attitude toward disclosure, and actual behavior regarding disclosure. Statistically significant differences between the high and low disclosure rate groups in the pro-disclosure group were found in the percentages of participants who cited the patient’s personality, presence or absence of BPSD, and marital status as priorities when considering disclosure issues. Additionally, it includes the percentage of participants who said they would not consult with other staff if the family wished not to disclose the patient’s condition. The low disclosure rate group in the pro-disclosure group, i.e., those who thought that disclosure should be provided but did not disclose much, had a larger proportion of those who thought that the personality of the patient and the presence or absence of BPSD were high priorities and a smaller proportion of those who thought that marital relations were a high priority compared to those who disclosed more. In addition, the percentage of those who said that they do not consult with other staff when a family member wishes not to inform the patient was smaller in the low disclosure rate group than it was in the high disclosure rate group.
4. Discussion
The results of this study provide the first current understanding of CMs’ attitudes toward disclosure and actual behaviors for disclosing the death of a spouse to a patient with dementia in Japan. Although the event of the spousal death of patients with dementia is frequently experienced by CMs, the implementation of disclosure varies from case to case. Since a certain number of CMs have experienced a worsening of BPSD and depression in their patients due to disclosure, concern about the possibility of such worsening may have influenced the implementation of disclosures. In addition, as indicated by the high priority given to the family’s intention (51%) when considering the issue of disclosure, the family’s intention tends to be important in the care of patients with dementia in Japan, and the family’s desire not to inform the patient may have influenced the implementation of the disclosure.
In our study, 82.3% of our participants were female, compared with 70% of the results of the survey on the treatment status of long-term care workers conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (2018a). The age distribution of the participants was higher than that of the same survey. Approximately 90% of this study’s participants had acquired senior CM status, compared with 35% of the completion rate of the senior CM training program in the survey conducted by the Ministry on home care support offices and works of care managers (2018b). The ratio of certified CMs was 38.3%, which was considered to be a very high ratio for the acquisition rate of 0.2% nationwide. Therefore, the participants in this study were slightly older than average and had a high percentage of senior CMs and certified CMs.
Regarding disclosure, about 83% stated positive opinions about disclosure, meaning that their policies were in line with those defending the rights of people with dementia. Although this survey does not explore the meaning of such a belief, it may be speculated that it is based on the way of life of a person living through the death of his or her spouse. If we do not ask patients with dementia to pursue such an essential way of life, we would regard them as having already deviated from their original way of life. Thus, we would hesitate to judge them in this way.
In the pro-disclosure group, about 44% were in the low disclosure rate group with an actual disclosure rate of less than 50%, indicating that a relatively large number of CMs face the dilemma of “thinking it would be better to disclose, but not being able to do so given the patient’s condition.” The results on the relationship between BPSD and depression and disclosure showed that attitudes toward BPSD influenced the disclosure rate. This is because depression does not increase the caregiving effort. However, worsening BPSD increases the caregiving effort and may lead to risky behavior, making CMs who have experienced BPSD more cautious about disclosing it.
It is instructive that the percentage of those who stated that they would not consult with other staff if a family member wished not to inform the patient was smaller in the low disclosure rate group than it was in the high disclosure rate group. This may indicate that the CMs’ beliefs regarding the patients’ best interests are changing as a result of discussion with others. It is generally believed that when ethical issues arise in the field of care, it is useful to discuss them with a multi-professional team to resolve them [25]. Furthermore, it can be considered that the integration of the ideas of each individual through consultation with others results in a more valid conclusion. In this sense, it is necessary for CMs to properly consult with multiple professionals rather than taking actions toward disclosure based solely on their ideas. Even if the rate of disclosure is reduced as a result of this, it should be evaluated as an increase in the ethical validity in the medical field. However, there is a possibility that the respondents may have shortsightedly avoided responsibility by consulting with others, and further research is needed in the future.
The possible limitations of this study include, first, that sampling bias may not have been eliminated. The participants from this study varied in sex, age, qualification acquisition rate, and so on from the entire CM population. In addition, the participants for this study were recruited from the participants of conferences and workshops. CMs who attend academic conferences and workshops are considered to be a group that is eager to improve their skills and acquire new knowledge. However, many CMs in Japan do not attend academic conferences and workshops. So, this may not represent the results for CMs in Japan as a whole. Second, selection bias, which has many research subjects interested in dementia, and recollection bias, which is a survey of past experiences, may also be factors. In addition, since this study is an exploratory survey of the current situation in Japan, the validity of the questionnaire has not been fully examined, and other factors may be relevant. Third, this study did not examine the positive effects of the disclosure of spousal death for patients with dementia because it was outside the scope of the research question. It is possible that the disclosure of spousal death for patients with dementia may have positive effects that we did not examine. Despite these limitations, this study is the first fact-finding research work on the disclosure of spousal death for people with dementia, and this is the first time that CMs’ policies for disclosure and the disclosure rate were examined. In addition, although accurate figures cannot be given for worsening BPSD and depression associated with disclosure, the fact that the experience ratio of CMs was aggregated can be considered a strength. Having gained an understanding of the ethical dilemma situation in which CMs find themselves, this study provides a foundation for future studies. It will be necessary to further refine the questions asked in the interview survey and conduct a questionnaire survey of a more representative group. Simultaneously, however, this study is the first step toward social outcomes. It is hoped that professional groups, such as academic organizations to which caregivers belong, will consolidate their unified views on the issue of disclosure. This is expected to confront the care environment for people with dementia, including CMs, in the future, and efforts will be made to formulate a certain set of guidelines. This may lead to a more improved care environment, including CMs, which, in turn, may contribute to improving the well-being of people with dementia. This study can be used as a basis for this purpose.
5. Conclusions
This study is the first survey conducted on the disclosure of spousal deaths of patients with dementia. Although more than 80% of CMs had experienced the spousal death of patients with dementia, the percentage of disclosures varied widely. In Japan, disclosure likely reflects the wishes of the family. However, simultaneously, it may also be influenced by the worsening of BPSD experienced by about 18% and the worsening of depression experienced by 26% of the participants. Nearly 83% of the participants were positive about disclosure, but about 44% of them disclosed less than 50% of the time. This indicates that a relatively large number of caregivers may be in a dilemma regarding disclosure. Despite the limitation of sampling bias in that the participants were recruited from academic conferences and workshops, along with the validity of the questionnaire, we found the actual situation of CMs’ attitudes regarding the management of the disclosure of a spousal death for patients with dementia. It is expected that this study will be used as a significant basis for formulating guidelines to address the disclosure issues of the care environment for patients with dementia regarding care management.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.K., K.M. and E.N.; data curation, H.K. and K.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.K., K.M. and E.N.; writing—review and editing, K.M., E.N. and A.A.; project administration, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo School of Medicine (2018150NI).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Hiroko Shiraki for her tremendous assistance in collecting the data.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2018. The Global Voice on Dementia. Available online: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2018.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2019).
- Kelly, F.; Innes, A. Human rights, citizenship and dementia care nursing. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 2013, 8, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teasdale, K.; Kent, G. The use of deception in nursing. J. Med. Ethics 1995, 21, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schermer, M. Nothing but the truth? On truth and deception in dementia care. Bioethics 2007, 21, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elvish, R.; James, I.; Milne, D. Lying in dementia care: An example of a culture that deceives in people’s best interests. Aging Ment. Health 2010, 14, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Day, A.M.; James, I.A.; Meyer, T.D.; Lee, D.R. Do people with dementia find lies and deception in dementia care acceptable? Aging Ment. Health 2011, 15, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tuckett, A.G. The experience of lying in dementia care: A qualitative study. Nurs. Ethics 2012, 19, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, A.; Eccles, F.; Keady, J.; Simpson, J.; Elvish, R. The use of the truth and deception in dementia care amongst general hospital staff. Aging Ment. Health 2017, 21, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe, E.G. Ethical Issues in Diagnosing and Treating Alzheimer Disease. Psychiatry 2006, 3, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
- Suzuka, A.; Muroya, K.; Tabuchi, Y. P-224 Support for care providers regarding notification of bereavement of an elderly person with dementia by a close relative. J. Jpn. Soc. Nurs. Res. 2019, 42, 587. [Google Scholar]
- Finkel, S.I.; Costa e Silva, J.; Cohen, G.; Miller, S.; Sartorius, N. Behavioral and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia: A consensus statement on current knowledge and implications for research and treatment. Int. Psychogeriatr. 1996, 8 Suppl 3, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsje, P.; Wetzels, R.B.; Lucassen, P.L.; Pot, A.M.; Koopmans, R.T. The course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in community-dwelling patients with dementia: A systematic review. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2015, 27, 385–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.-F.; Tan, L.; Wang, H.-F.; Jiang, T.; Tan, M.-S.; Tan, L.; Xu, W.; Li, J.-Q.; Wang, J.; Lai, T.-J.; et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect Disord. 2016, 190, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, W.S.; Rubin, E.H.; Coats, M.; John, M. Early-stage Alzheimer disease represents increased suicidal risk in relation to later stages. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2005, 19, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikorski, C.; Luppa, M.; Heser, K.; Ernst, A.; Lange, C.; Werle, J.; Bickel, H.; Mösch, E.; Wiese, B.; Prokein, J.; et al. The role of spousal loss in the development of depressive symptoms in the elderly—Implications for diagnostic systems. J. Affect. Disord. 2014, 161, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serafini, G.; Calcagno, P.; Lester, D.; Paolo, G.; Mario, A.; Maurizio, P. Suicide risk in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016, 13, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conejero, I.; Olié, E.; Courtet, P.; Calati, R. Suicide in older adults: Current perspectives. Clin. Interv. Aging 2018, 13, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmes, T.H.; Rahe, R.H. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. J. Psychosom. Res. 1967, 1, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long-Term Care Insurance Act (Japan). Act No. 123 of 17 December 1997. Available online: https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3807/en (accessed on 17 August 2022).
- Hashimoto, C. Processes Necessary When Care Managers Obtain Support Cooperation from the Families of Elderly People Who Need Assistance. Jpn. J. Soc. Welf. 2016, 57, 42–57. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, M.M.; Trzinski, A.L. Counseling older adults with dementia who are dealing with death: Innovative interventions for practitioners. Death Stud. 2006, 30, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, I.A.; Wood-Mitchell, A.J.; Waterworth, A.M.; Mackenzie, L.E.; Cunningham, J. Lying to people with dementia: Developing ethical guidelines for care settings. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2006, 21, 800–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, K.S. Can deceiving patients be morally acceptable? BMJ 2007, 334, 984–986. [Google Scholar]
- Sclan, S.G.; Reisberg, B. Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: Reliability, validity, and ordinality. Int Psychogeriatr. 1992, 4, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Irvine, R.; Kerridge, I.; Mcphee, J.; Freeman, S. Interprofessionalism and ethics: Consensus or clash of cultures? J. Interprof. Care 2002, 16, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Basic attributes of the participants, and the experience with spousal deaths of patients with dementia.
Table 1.
Basic attributes of the participants, and the experience with spousal deaths of patients with dementia.
| n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attributes | Sex | Male | 83 | (16.3%) |
| Female | 385 | (75.8%) | ||
| No response | 40 | (7.9%) | ||
| Age | ≤30s | 31 | (6.1%) | |
| 40s | 140 | (27.6%) | ||
| 50s | 219 | (43.1%) | ||
| ≥60s | 91 | (17.9%) | ||
| No response | 27 | (5.3%) | ||
| Years of experience as CM | <10 years | 138 | (27.2%) | |
| 10–14 years | 171 | (33.7%) | ||
| ≥15 years | 187 | (36.8%) | ||
| No response | 12 | (2.4%) | ||
| Qualification of senior CM | No | 110 | (21.7%) | |
| Yes | 398 | (78.3%) | ||
| Qualification of certified CM | No | 338 | (66.5%) | |
| Yes | 170 | (33.5%) | ||
| Experience | Experiences with spousal deaths of patients with dementia | 0 | 81 | (15.9%) |
| 1–2 | 128 | (25.2%) | ||
| 3–5 | 171 | (33.7%) | ||
| ≥6 | 114 | (22.4%) | ||
| No response | 14 | (2.8%) | ||
| Disclosure rate (only for those with case experience) | 0, 10, 20, 30% | 116 | (28.1%) | |
| 40, 50, 60, 70% | 126 | (30.5%) | ||
| 80, 90, 100% | 144 | (34.9%) | ||
| No response | 27 | (6.5%) | ||
| Experienced problems with worsening BPSD due to disclosure (only for those who have experienced disclosure) | Yes | 67 | (18.4%) | |
| No | 288 | (78.9%) | ||
| No response | 10 | (2.7%) | ||
| Experienced problems with worsening depression due to disclosure (only for those who have experienced disclosure) | Yes | 95 | (26.0%) | |
| No | 255 | (69.9%) | ||
| No response | 15 | (4.1%) | ||
Table 2.
Attitude toward disclosure and actual behavior regarding disclosure.
| n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude | Attitude on disclosure | Should be disclosed | 201 | (39.6%) |
| Better to disclose | 219 | (43.1%) | ||
| No need to disclose | 73 | (14.4%) | ||
| Better to not disclose | 6 | (1.2%) | ||
| No response | 9 | (1.8%) | ||
| Priorities when considering disclosure issues (multiple responses) | Patient’s right to know | 245 | (48.2%) | |
| Personality of the patient | 126 | (24.8%) | ||
| Progression of dementia | 127 | (25.0%) | ||
| Presence or absence of BPSD | 118 | (23.2%) | ||
| Presence or absence of Depression | 124 | (24.4%) | ||
| Marital relationship | 102 | (20.1%) | ||
| Family structure | 31 | (6.1%) | ||
| Family’s intention | 259 | (51.0%) | ||
| Opinion of healthcare provider | 27 | (5.3%) | ||
| Other | 6 | (1.2%) | ||
| No answer | 91 | (17.9%) | ||
| How far along in the progression of dementia do you think it is better to disclose? | To the extent of the progression that the patient’s cognitive function is age-appropriate, but the patients are forgetful | 70 | (13.8%) | |
| To the extent of the progression that the patient has no problems in daily life but cannot perform complex tasks | 30 | (5.9%) | ||
| To the extent of the progression that the patient has trouble managing money or shopping | 59 | (11.6%) | ||
| To the extent of the progression that the patient is no longer able to choose his/her own clothes | 22 | (4.3%) | ||
| To the extent of the progression that the patient requires assistance in many daily activities | 54 | (10.6%) | ||
| To the extent of the progression that the patient’s vocabulary and facial expressions have deteriorated and walking has become difficult | 34 | (6.7%) | ||
| Regardless of the degree of progress, even if the patient is bedridden or unable to speak | 218 | (42.9%) | ||
| No response | 21 | (4.1%) | ||
| Actual behavior | Action for family members if they wish not to disclose to the patient | Respect the family’ wishes as they are and do not intervene specifically | 196 | (38.6%) |
| Talk to the family about the advantages and disadvantages of telling the person and ask them to reconsider | 202 | (39.8%) | ||
| Respect the patient’s right to know and suggest to the family that they tell the patient, or try to persuade the family to tell the patient | 78 | (15.4%) | ||
| No response | 32 | (6.3%) | ||
| Actions for other staff if family members prefer not to disclose to the patient (multiple responses) | Consult with a colleague CM | 262 | (51.6%) | |
| Ask the attending physician of the patient for his/her opinion | 204 | (40.2%) | ||
| Hold a multi-professional meeting | 230 | (45.3%) | ||
| Basically, do not consult with other staff | 42 | (8.3%) | ||
| No response | 36 | (7.1%) | ||
Table 3.
Consistency of the attitude toward disclosure and the disclosure rate among those who experienced the spousal death of a patient with dementia.
Table 3.
Consistency of the attitude toward disclosure and the disclosure rate among those who experienced the spousal death of a patient with dementia.
| Low Disclosure Rate (Disclosure Rate ≤ 50%) | High Disclosure Rate(Disclosure Rate ≥ 60%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-disclosure | 141 | (43.8%) | 181 | (56.2%) |
| Anti-disclosure | 49 | (83.1%) | 10 | (16.9%) |
Table 4.
Difference between the low and high disclosure rate groups in the pro-disclosure group.
| Low Disclosure Rate Groups n (%) | High Disclosure Rate Groups n (%) | Fisher’s Exact Test p-Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attributes | Sex | Male | 26 | (19.7%) | 30 | (18.0%) | 0.766 |
| Female | 106 | (80.3%) | 137 | (82.0%) | |||
| Age | ≤30s | 11 | (8.4%) | 10 | (5.7%) | 0.354 | |
| 40s | 32 | (24.4%) | 57 | (32.6%) | |||
| 50s | 59 | (45.0%) | 77 | (44.0%) | |||
| ≥60s | 29 | (22.1%) | 31 | (17.7%) | |||
| Years of experience as CM | <10 years | 37 | (26.6%) | 38 | (21.5%) | 0.521 | |
| 10–14 years | 45 | (32.4%) | 58 | (32.8%) | |||
| ≥15 years | 57 | (41.0%) | 81 | (45.8%) | |||
| Qualification of senior CM | No | 24 | (17.0%) | 37 | (20.4%) | 0.476 | |
| Yes | 117 | (83.0%) | 144 | (79.6%) | |||
| Qualification of certified CM | No | 92 | (65.2%) | 110 | (60.8%) | 0.419 | |
| Yes | 49 | (34.8%) | 71 | (39.2%) | |||
| Experience | Experiences with spousal deaths of patients with dementia | 1–2 | 46 | (32.6%) | 47 | (26.0%) | 0.317 |
| 3–5 | 59 | (41.8%) | 76 | (42.0%) | |||
| ≥6 | 36 | (25.5%) | 58 | (32.0%) | |||
| Experienced problems with worsening BPSD due to disclosure | Yes | 28 | (20.4%) | 25 | (14.0%) | 0.171 | |
| No | 109 | (79.6%) | 153 | (86.0%) | |||
| Experienced problems with worsening depression due to disclosure | Yes | 36 | (26.7%) | 44 | (25.0%) | 0.794 | |
| No | 99 | (73.3%) | 132 | (75.0%) | |||
| Policy | Priorities when considering disclosure issues (multiple responses) | Patient’s right to know | 71 | (58.7%) | 104 | (68.4%) | 0.101 |
| Personality of the patient | 45 | (37.2%) | 33 | (21.7%) | 0.007 | ||
| Progression of dementia | 34 | (28.1%) | 31 | (20.4%) | 0.154 | ||
| Presence or absence of BPSD | 47 | (38.8%) | 26 | (17.1%) | <0.001 | ||
| Presence or absence of Depression | 32 | (26.4%) | 51 | (33.6%) | 0.234 | ||
| Marital relationship | 24 | (19.8%) | 53 | (34.9%) | 0.007 | ||
| Family structure | 10 | (8.3%) | 7 | (4.6%) | 0.313 | ||
| Family’s intention | 74 | (61.2%) | 97 | (63.8%) | 0.706 | ||
| Opinion of healthcare provider | 5 | (4.1%) | 14 | (9.2%) | 0.150 | ||
| Other | 1 | (0.8%) | 4 | (2.6%) | 0.387 | ||
| Actual behavior | Behavior taken by CM toward family members when family members wish not to disclose to the patient | Respect the family’ wishes as they are and do not intervene specifically | 54 | (40.0%) | 61 | (34.7%) | 0.614 |
| Talk to the family about the advantages and disadvantages of telling the person and ask them to reconsider | 58 | (43.0%) | 81 | (46.0%) | |||
| Respect the patient’s right to know and suggest to the family that they tell the patient, or try to persuade the family to tell the patient | 23 | (17.0%) | 34 | (19.3%) | |||
| Behavior taken by CM toward other staff when family members wish not to disclose to the patient (multiple responses) | Consult with a colleague CM | 73 | (54.5%) | 89 | (51.7%) | 0.646 | |
| Ask the attending physician of the patient for his/her opinion | 56 | (41.8%) | 78 | (45.3%) | 0.563 | ||
| Hold a multi-professional meeting | 69 | (51.5%) | 83 | (48.3%) | 0.645 | ||
| Basically, do not consult with other staff | 7 | (5.2%) | 21 | (12.2%) | 0.045 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kato, H.; Nakazawa, E.; Mori, K.; Akabayashi, A. Disclosure of Spousal Death to Patients with Dementia: Attitude and Actual Behavior of Care Managers. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13, 419-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020031
AMA Style
Kato H, Nakazawa E, Mori K, Akabayashi A. Disclosure of Spousal Death to Patients with Dementia: Attitude and Actual Behavior of Care Managers. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2023; 13(2):419-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020031
Chicago/Turabian StyleKato, Hisashi, Eisuke Nakazawa, Katsumi Mori, and Akira Akabayashi. 2023. "Disclosure of Spousal Death to Patients with Dementia: Attitude and Actual Behavior of Care Managers" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 13, no. 2: 419-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020031
APA StyleKato, H., Nakazawa, E., Mori, K., & Akabayashi, A. (2023). Disclosure of Spousal Death to Patients with Dementia: Attitude and Actual Behavior of Care Managers. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020031
