Next Article in Journal
Exceptional Points in a Non-Markovian Anti-Parity-Time Symmetric System
Next Article in Special Issue
Advanced Polarimetry and Polarimetric Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Phase-Controlled Absorption and Dispersion Properties of a Multi-Level Quantum Emitter Interacting with Bismuth-Chalcogenide Microparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polarization Lidar: Principles and Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Numerical Study of the Spectrum of TE-Polarized Electromagnetic Waves of a Goubau Line Coated with Graphene

1
Academy of Technology and Environment, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden
2
Department of Mathematics and Supercomputing, Penza State University, 440026 Penza, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(12), 1297; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121297
Submission received: 28 September 2023 / Revised: 13 November 2023 / Accepted: 21 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polarimetry and Polarimetric Imaging)

Abstract

:
The problem of TE-polarized waves in a Goubau line (a perfectly conducting cylinder covered by a concentric layer) coated with graphene is studied. The classification of the waves existing in a Goubau line is carried out. The physical problem is reduced to solving a transmission eigenvalue problem for an ordinary differential equation. The conjugation conditions contain the conductivity of graphene. In this work, we take into account the nonlinearity of graphene. Spectral parameters of the problem are the propagation constants of the waveguide. The article proposes a numerical method for calculating the propagation constants of such waves. A number of numerical experiments were carried out with a Goubau line filled with a dielectric, inhomogeneous dielectric, dielectric with losses, and metamaterial.

1. Introduction

After the discovery of graphene by A. Geim and K. Novoselov [1], the so-called two-dimensional materials, which are considered infinitely thin in a mathematical model and are modeled using special conditions on the surface of a substrate, began to be actively studied. Graphene is the most popular and promising two-dimensional material due to a number of unique properties. It is a layer that is one atom thick and forms a hexagonal crystal lattice of carbon atoms. Graphene is already being used in photonics and optoelectronics. In addition, graphene can also be used in waveguide structures to improve their characteristics. In particular, graphene can be used in various optical devices, such as photodetectors, modulators, and polarizers [2].
A large number of papers have been published on the propagation of electromagnetic waves in waveguide devices containing graphene. Most often, TE and TM waves propagating in a dielectric layer coated with graphene are studied [3,4,5]. Moreover, graphene can be located on both sides of the dielectric layer and is able to support plasmon modes [6,7,8]. Plane structures consisting of several alternating layers of dielectric and graphene have also been considered [9].
Graphene nonlinearity was predicted in [10,11], and, later, in [12], it received experimental confirmation. A third-order nonlinearity was found in the terahertz and infrared frequency ranges, similar to the well-known Kerr’s law. Attempts have been made to use the effect of graphene nonlinearity in photonic devices [13].
This article is devoted to the development of a numerical method for determining the propagation constants of surface, complex, and leaky modes of monochromatic TE-polarized waves in an inhomogeneous Goubau line coated on one side with graphene. At the same time, we take into account the nonlinearity of graphene, which is expressed in changing the standard interface conditions at the interface of media to special conditions containing a nonlinear dependence of conductivity on the intensity of the surface electric field.
Such a statement of the boundary value problem for the system of Maxwell’s equations leads to the need to develop new numerical methods for solving the problem, since nonlinear problems of this type have not been studied before. In our formulation of the problem, there are a number of restrictions on the parameters of the waveguide structure. First of all, we do not take into account the absorption in either the dielectric layer or graphene. This assumption is often implemented in practice, since the absorption in the terahertz range is small compared to the strong plasmon response of graphene. In addition, we assume that the conductivity of the graphene depends only on the tangential components of the electric field, more precisely, on its intensity. In this case, the nonlinear part of the conductivity is determined by the amplitude of the TE wave and does not depend on the longitudinal coordinate. This allows us to consider arbitrary, including complex, constant propagations and to study not only surface modes but also complex and leaky modes as well. At the same time, graphene nonlinearity is taken into account in all cases.
From a mathematical point of view, we deal with eigenvalue problems for one differential equation in the case of TE waves with “non-classical” boundary conditions: on the inner boundary, we have one homogeneous condition of the first kind and an additional nonhomogeneous condition of the second kind, which is required in order to determine a discrete set of solutions, and on the external boundary, we have a condition that is nonlinear with respect to a sought-for function.
We will obtain a dispersion equation with the property that its solution is an eigenvalue of the corresponding problem and, conversely, any eigenvalue of the problem is a solution to the dispersion equation. By studying characteristic equations, we will obtain sufficient conditions ensuring that the considered eigenvalue problem has solutions. From a physical point of view, this means that if these conditions are satisfied, then the waveguiding structure studied in the paper is able to support TE-eigenwaves.
An analysis of wave propagation in open metal–dielectric waveguides constitutes an important class of electromagnetic problems. A conducting cylinder covered by a concentric dielectric layer, the Goubau line, is the simplest type of such guiding structures. A complete mathematical investigation of the spectrum of symmetric surface modes in a Goubau line is performed in [14,15,16].
A large number of papers have been devoted to the study of electromagnetic properties of structures containing graphene layers. Many properties of such structures have been studied quite fully, and there is a significant number of their applications in practice (see, for example, [17,18,19,20,21,22]).
The classification of waves existing in the Goubau line is an urgent task in the study of waveguides. In this work, a general formulation of the problem is proposed, covering a wide class of TE-polarized waves and various materials filling the waveguide. A numerical method that allows one to calculate the wave propagation constants is proposed. The numerical method is based on the solution to an auxiliary Cauchy problem. Based on this method, it is possible to classify electromagnetic TE-polarized waves existing in a Goubau line: leaky and surface waves (depending on the condition at infinity) and evanescent, propagating and complex waves (depending on the propagation constant).
In this paper, the problem of the propagation of a TE wave in a Goubau line coated with graphene is considered. The graphene coating is considered infinitely thin and leads to a change in one conjugation condition when setting the problem. Such a model is determined by the fact that the graphene layer has a thickness of the order of one atom. Since graphene exhibits nonlinearity, in this article, we will take nonlinearity into account.
The article presents the calculations of the Goubau line filled with a dielectric, inhomogeneous dielectric, dielectric with losses and metamaterial. The calculations were made at different frequencies. Thus, we numerically found complex, evanescent, and propagating leaky waves and complex, evanescent, and propagating surface waves.

2. Statement of the Problem

Consider the three-dimensional space R 3 equipped with the cylindrical coordinate system O ρ φ z and filled with a isotropic source-free medium with permittivity ε c ε 0 c o n s t and permeability μ 0 c o n s t , where ε 0 and μ 0 are the permittivity and permeability of a vacuum. We consider electromagnetic waves propagating through a Goubau line:
Σ : = ρ , φ : r 0 ρ r , 0 φ < 2 π
and a generating line parallel to the axis O z is placed in R 3 .
The cross section of the Goubau line consists of two concentric circles with radii r 0 and r (see Figure 1): r 0 is the radius of the internal (perfectly conducting) cylinder, and r 0 r is the thickness of the external cylindrical shell.
We assume that the fields depend harmonically on time as exp ( i ω t ) , where ω > 0 is the circular frequency.
The determination of TE-polarized waves reduces to finding nontrivial running-wave solutions of the homogeneous system of Maxwell equations depending on the coordinate z along which the structure is regular in the form e i γ z ,
× H = i ω ε 0 ε ˜ E , × E = i ω μ 0 H ,
E = 0 , E φ ( ρ ) e i γ z , 0 , H = H ρ ( ρ ) e i γ z , 0 , H z ( ρ ) e i γ z ,
with boundary conditions for a tangential electric field component on a perfectly conducting screen
E φ ρ = r 0 = 0 ,
and the transmission conditions for the tangential electric and magnetic field components on the permittivity discontinuity surface ( ρ = r )
E φ r + 0 E φ r 0 = 0 , H z r + 0 H z r 0 = σ 1 + σ 3 | E φ r + 0 | 2 E φ r + 0 ,
where [ f ] x 0 = lim x x 0 0 f ( x ) lim x x 0 + 0 f ( x ) and σ 1 = i σ , σ 3 = i σ , σ > 0 and σ > 0 .
We will not fix the radiation condition at infinity because we want to consider the problem for arbitrary γ .
We assume that the relative permittivity in the entire space has the form
ε ˜ = ε ( ρ ) , r 0 ρ r , ε c , r 0 ρ > r ,
We also assume that ε ( ρ ) is a continuous function on the segment [ r 0 , r ] , i.e., ε ( ρ ) C [ r 0 , r ] .
The problem of normal waves is an eigenvalue problem for the Maxwell equations with spectral parameter γ , which is the propagation constant of waveguiding structure.
The normal wave field in the waveguide can be represented using one scalar function
u : = E φ ( ρ ) .
Thus, the problem is reduced to finding the tangential component of the electric field u. Throughout the text below, · stands for differentiation with respect to ρ .
Definition 1. 
The propagating wave is characterized by the real parameter γ.
Definition 2. 
The evanescent wave is characterized by the pure imaginary parameter γ.
Definition 3. 
The complex wave is characterized by the complex parameter γ such that γ γ 0 .
Definition 4. 
The surface wave satisfies the condition u ( ρ ) 0 , ρ .
Definition 5. 
The leaky wave satisfies the condition u ( ρ ) , ρ .
Remark 1. 
The Propagation constant γ characterises the behavior of a wave (propagating, evanescent, or complex) in the z direction. The classification of waves as surface or leaky depends on the behavior in the ρ-direction.
We have the following eigenvalue problem for the tangential electric field component u: find γ C such that there exist nontrivial solutions of the differential equation
u + ρ 1 u ρ 2 u + ω 2 μ 0 ε 0 ε ˜ γ 2 u = 0 ,
satisfying the boundary conditions
u ( r 0 ) = 0 ,
and the transmission conditions
u ( r 0 ) = u ( r + 0 ) , u ( r 0 ) = u ( r + 0 ) + ς u ( r + 0 ) ,
where ς = ω μ 0 σ σ | u ( r + 0 ) | 2 .
Thus the resulting field ( E , H ) will satisfy all conditions (1)–(3).
For ρ > r , we have ε ˜ = ε c ; then, from (4), we obtain the equation
u + ρ 1 u ρ 2 u κ 2 u = 0 .
In accordance with the condition at infinity (see Definitions 4 and 5), we choose a solution to the last equation for surface waves in the form
u = C 1 K 1 ( κ ρ ) , ρ > r ,
and for leaky waves
u = C 2 I 1 ( κ ρ ) , ρ > r ,
where κ = γ 2 ω 2 ε c ε 0 μ 0 and κ > 0 , C 1 and C 2 are the constants, and K m and I m are the modified Bessel functions (Macdonald and Infeld functions) [23].
For r 0 < ρ < r , we have ε ˜ = ε ( ρ ) ; thus, from (4), we obtain the equation
u + ρ 1 u ρ 2 u + ϵ γ 2 u = 0 ,
where
ϵ ( ρ ; ω ) = ω 2 ε 0 μ 0 ε ( ρ ) .
Definition 6. 
γ C is called a propagation constant of the problem if there exists a nontrivial solution u to Equation (10) for r 0 < ρ < r , satisfying, for ρ > r , solutions (8) for surface waves and (9) for leaky waves, respectively, the boundary condition (5), and the transmission conditions (6).

3. Numerical Method

Let us consider the Cauchy problem for Equation (10) with the initial conditions
u r 0 : = 0 , u r 0 : = A ,
where A is a known constant.
We assume that the Cauchy problem (10), (12) is globally and uniquely solvable on the segment [ r 0 , r ] for given values r 0 , r, and its solution continuously depends on the parameter γ . Using the transmission condition on the boundary ρ = r (6), one has the dispersion equation for surface waves
Δ γ K 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) ς K 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) + κ K 0 ( κ r ) + r 1 K 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) = 0 ,
and the dispersion equation for leaky waves
Δ γ I 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) ς I 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) κ I 0 ( κ r ) r 1 I 1 ( κ r ) u ( r ) = 0 ,
where quantities u ( r ) and u ( r ) are obtained from the solution to the Cauchy problem (10), (12).
Let γ = α + i β , where α , β R . Then, equating to zero the real and imaginary parts of Δ γ , one obtains a system of real equations for determining the real and imaginary parts of the complex parameter γ :
Δ 1 α , β : = Δ γ = 0 , Δ 2 α , β : = Δ γ = 0 .
We will numerically solve a system of Equation (15) to determine the pair ( α , β ) . The solution to each equation of the system (15) is a curve in the plane O α β . Then, we determine points of intersections of the curves; these points are approximate eigenvalues of the problem. Let us introduce a grid
{ α ( i ) , β ( j ) : α ( i ) = a 1 + i τ 1 , β ( j ) = b 1 + i τ 2 , i = 0 , n ¯ , τ 1 = a 2 a 1 n , j = 0 , m ¯ , τ 2 = b 2 b 1 m }
with a step τ 1 > 0 in α and a step τ 2 > 0 in β , where a 1 , a 2 , b 1 , b 2 are real fixed constants. We use grid points for the shooting method.
Solving the Cauchy problem (10), (12) for each grid point, one obtains u ( i , j ) ( r ) and u ( i , j ) ( r ) , i = 0 , n ¯ , j = 0 , m ¯ . Since the solution u ( r ; α , β ) is continuously dependent on the parameters α and β , it follows that there exists a point ( α ( i ) , β ^ ( j ) ) in the plane O α β , where β ^ ( j ) β ( j ) , β ( j + 1 ) , such that Δ 1 ( α ( i ) , β ^ ( j ) ) = 0 . The less τ 1 and τ 2 , the more exact a solution. Continuing in the same way, one finds a set of pairs ( α ( p ) , β ( q ) ) that are a curve in the plane O α β (the blue curve in Figure 2).
Applying the same approach to the second equation of (15), one obtains another curve in the plane O α β (the red curve in Figure 2). This curve is an approximate solution to the equation Δ 2 α , β = 0 . It is clear that the intersection points of the curves (the yellow point in Figure 2) are approximate solutions of the problem. By decreasing the steps τ 1 and τ 2 , we can obtain arbitrarily accurate solutions.

4. Numerical Results

In Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, the results of calculating the propagation constants for the problem of the propagation of TE-polarized waves in a Goubau line filled with a dielectric, inhomogeneous dielectric, dielectric with losses, and metamaterial are presented. We have carried out numerical experiments for four frequency values. Propagating, evanescent, complex surface TE waves, and propagating, evanescent, and complex leaky TE waves are found.
The following values of parameters are used for calculations: σ = 4.67   ×   10 4 S · m2· V−2, σ = 2.15   ×   10 17 S · m2 · V−2, ε c = 1 , ε 0 = 1 , μ 0 = 1 , A = 1   ·   10 7 V · m−1, r 0 = 0.02 m, r = 0.04 m, a 1 = 3 , a 2 = 3 , τ 1 = 0.025 , b 1 = 3 , b 2 = 3 , τ 2 = 0.025 .
In Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, the solutions to the problem of surface TE waves in a Goubau line are presented. There are no complex surface TE waves (yellow points). In Figure 3 and Figure 6, we have carried out numerical experiments for a dielectric with constant permittivity and a dielectric with losses. In these cases, propagating surface TE waves (green points) do not exist at all frequencies. If the waveguide is filled with an inhomogeneous dielectric (as in Figure 4), then with increasing frequency, the number of propagating surface TE waves increases; in addition, values of real propagating constants increase in the modulus. In the case of a metamaterial (see Figure 6), with increasing frequency, the absolute values of the propagation constants corresponding to the evanescent surface TE waves decrease, and the absolute values of the propagation constants corresponding to the propagating surface TE waves increase.
In Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, solutions to the problem of leaky TE waves in a Goubau line are shown. In the case of a homogeneous dielectric with constant permittivity, all types of leaky TE waves exist at all chosen frequencies (see Figure 7). It can be seen, that with increasing frequency, the absolute values of the real propagation constants increase, the absolute values of the complex propagation constants decrease, and the number of the imaginary propagation constants increases. This trend continues in the case of homogeneous dielectric shown in Figure 8 and in the case of dielectric with losses shown in Figure 9. In the case of a metamaterial (see Figure 10), propagating leaky TE waves (green points) do not exist at all frequencies. In the case with increasing frequency, the absolute values of the imaginary part of the propagation constants corresponding to the complex surface TE waves (yellow points) increase, and the absolute values of the real part of the propagation constants tend to zero.

5. Conclusions

We have developed a numerical method of analysis of the surface TE wave propagation in an inhomogeneous metal–dielectric waveguide structure coated with graphene. The physical problem is reduced to a transmission eigenvalue problem for Maxwell’s equations. Using the solutions to an auxiliary Cauchy problem with initial conditions on the boundary ρ = r 0 and transmission conditions on the boundary ρ = r , it is possible to obtain the dispersion equations for surface and leaky waves. The numerical determination of approximate solutions is performed using a version of the shooting method developed specifically for this class of problems.
It can be seen from the numerical results that propagating surface waves and propagating leaky waves exist only at certain frequencies. In addition, complex surface waves were not found.

6. Discussion

In this paper, the problem of propagation of an electromagnetic TE wave in an inhomogeneous Goubau line with a graphene layer was studied. More precisely, a circular concentric dielectric layer is covered with an infinitely thin layer of graphene. Unlike most similar works, graphene’s nonlinearity is taken into account here, which appears in the terahertz and infrared frequency ranges. In this case, the nonlinearity is described using the Kerr-type law, that is, cubic nonlinearity is considered. Since the graphene layer has a thickness of the order of one atom, only tangential components of the electric field are taken into account in the nonlinearity. In addition, we assume that the nonlinearity is determined only by the amplitudes of the propagating waves and does not depend on the longitudinal coordinate.
We consider both homogeneous and inhomogeneous Goubau lines. Both surface and leaky waves are studied. In all cases, we obtain an implicit dispersion equation by applying a numerical method. With the help of the dispersion equation, the propagation constants corresponding to the eigenwave of the waveguide are determined. Note that the proposed method makes it possible to find not only real but also complex constants of the propagation of normal waves in the Goubau line.
It makes sense to take into account nonlinear effects in graphene when nonlinearity has a significant impact on the propagation of electromagnetic waves, that is, if the radiation is strong enough.
In [24], the similar nonlinear eigenvalue problem of electromagnetic wave propagation in a plane dielectric layer covered with graphene was considered. In that paper, the dispersion equation was obtained explicitly. Eigenwaves, as well as propagating constants of surface waves, were calculated. In this paper, we consider not only surface waves but also leaky and complex waves.
Note that we did not obtain an explicit dispersion equation. Our approach is very different. First, we reduce the boundary eigenvalue problem to a Cauchy problem using initial conditions. Then, we solve the Cauchy problem numerically via an appropriate code. Thus, we obtain dispersion equations at the external boundary. The dispersion equation is solved with respect to a spectral parameter, i.e., the propagating constant.
Usually, along with TE-polarized waves, TM-polarized waves in the waveguide structure are also considered. In this article, we have focused on the study of only TE-polarized waves, but TM waves can also be studied using the proposed method. But when studying TM waves, it is already necessary to change the formulation of the problem, so it is natural to consider this case separately. The case of hybrid waves is interesting when both electric and magnetic longitudinal components of an electromagnetic wave take place. In this case, the proposed research method is also applicable, but the system of differential equations becomes much more complicated.
In addition to the waveguide structure discussed in this article, it is interesting to study more complex configurations consisting of several dielectric concentric layers with graphene coatings on each of them. It is not difficult to see that the method will again be applicable to finding the propagation constants of surface, complex, and leaky waves. Such structures can be very useful in practice. It should also be noted that the problem investigated in the article is new from a mathematical point of view since nonlinear coupling conditions are very exotic in mathematical physics and, as far as the authors know, have not been considered before. Therefore, the development of new numerical methods for solving nonlinear eigenvalue problems of this type is an urgent problem in mathematical physics.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.S.; software, E.S.; investigation, E.S. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.; visualization, E.S.; supervision, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation under the project 20-11-20087.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Heydari, M.B.; Samiei, M.H.V. Plasmonic Graphene Waveguides: A Literature Review. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1809.09937. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huawei, L.; Shuangchen, R.; Min, Z.; Hong, S.; Ling, L.I. Graphene surface plasmon polaritons with opposite in-plane electron oscillations along its two surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 091602. [Google Scholar]
  4. How, G.C.; Son, C.H.; Ping, L.E. Synthesis of highly confined surface plasmon modes with doped graphene sheets in the midinfrared and terahertz frequencies. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 125431. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu, B.; Ren, G.; Zheng, S.; Lin, Z.; Jian, S. Nanoscale dielectric-graphene-dielectric tunable infrared waveguide with ultrahigh refractive indices. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 17089–17096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Svintsov, D.; Vyurkov, V.; Ryzhii, V.; Otsuji, T. Voltage-controlled surface plasmon-polaritons in double graphene layer structures. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 053701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Belonenko, M.B.; Lebedev, N.G.; Yanyushkina, N.N. Solitons in a system of coupled graphene Waveguides. Phys. Solid State 2012, 54, 174–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Buslaev, P.I.; Iorsh, I.V.; Shadrivov, I.V.; Belov, P.A.; Kivshar, Y.S. Plasmons in waveguide structures formed by two graphene layers. JETP Lett. 2013, 97, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evseev, D.A.; Eliseeva, S.V.; Sementsov, D.I. Waves in a plane graphene - dielectric waveguide Structure. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 80, 10501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mikhailov, S.A. Non-linear electromagnetic response of graphene. Europhys. Lett. 2007, 79, 27002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mikhailov, S.A.; Ziegler, K. Nonlinear electromagnetic response of graphene: Frequency multiplication and the self-consistent-field effects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 384204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hendry, E.; Hale, P.J.; Moger, J.; Savchenko, A.K.; Mikhailov, S.A. Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 097401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ooi, K.J.A.; Tan, D.T.H. Nonlinear graphene plasmonics. Proc. R. Soc. 2017, 473, 20170433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goubau, G. Surface waves and their application to transmission lines. J. Appl. Phys. 1950, 21, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Harms, F. Elektromagnetische wellen an einem draht mit isolierender zylindrischer hülle. Ann. Phys. 1907, 6, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sommerfeld, A. Über die Fortpflanzung elektrodynamischer Wellen langs eines Drahtes. Ann. Phys. 1899, 67, 233–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Avouris, P. Graphene: Electronic and photonic properties and devices. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4285–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, C.; Wei, X.D.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer grapheme. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, L.; Phua, S.L.; Toh, C.L.; Zhang, L.; Ling, H.; Chang, M.; Zhou, D.; Dong, Y.; Lu, X. Polydopamine-coated graphene as multifunctional nanofillers in polyurethane. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6377–6385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naushad, M. A New Generation Material Graphene: Applications in Water Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 7, pp. 187–208. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hanson, G.W. Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 064302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions; National Bureau of Standards: Washington, DC, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  24. Smirnov, Y.; Tikhov, S. The nonlinear eigenvalue problem of electromagnetic wave propagation in a dielectric layer covered with graphene. Photonics 2023, 10, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Goubau line coated with graphene.
Figure 1. Goubau line coated with graphene.
Photonics 10 01297 g001
Figure 2. Numerical solution to the system (15): the blue curve is a solution to the first equation of (15); the red curve is a solution to the second equation of (15); the yellow point is a solution to the system (15).
Figure 2. Numerical solution to the system (15): the blue curve is a solution to the first equation of (15); the red curve is a solution to the second equation of (15); the yellow point is a solution to the system (15).
Photonics 10 01297 g002
Figure 3. Surface waves. Homogeneous dielectric with ε = 4 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Figure 3. Surface waves. Homogeneous dielectric with ε = 4 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g003aPhotonics 10 01297 g003b
Figure 4. Surface waves. Inhomogeneous dielectric with ε ( ρ ) = 4 + ρ r r 0 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Figure 4. Surface waves. Inhomogeneous dielectric with ε ( ρ ) = 4 + ρ r r 0 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g004
Figure 5. Surface waves. Dielectric with losses with ε = 4 + 0.1 ω i . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Figure 5. Surface waves. Dielectric with losses with ε = 4 + 0.1 ω i . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g005
Figure 6. Surface waves. Metamaterial with ε = 4. Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Figure 6. Surface waves. Metamaterial with ε = 4. Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating surface TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent surface TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g006aPhotonics 10 01297 g006b
Figure 7. Leaky waves. Homogeneous dielectric with ε = 4 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Figure 7. Leaky waves. Homogeneous dielectric with ε = 4 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g007
Figure 8. Leaky waves. Inhomogeneous dielectric with ε ( ρ ) = 4 + ρ r r 0 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Figure 8. Leaky waves. Inhomogeneous dielectric with ε ( ρ ) = 4 + ρ r r 0 . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g008
Figure 9. Leaky waves. Dielectric with losses with ε = 4 + 0.1 ω i . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Figure 9. Leaky waves. Dielectric with losses with ε = 4 + 0.1 ω i . Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g009aPhotonics 10 01297 g009b
Figure 10. Leaky waves. Metamaterial with ε = 4. Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Figure 10. Leaky waves. Metamaterial with ε = 4. Numerical solution to the system (15): blue curves are a solution to the first equation of (15); red curves are a solution to the second equation of (15); green intersection points correspond to propagating leaky TE waves; purple intersection points correspond to evanescent leaky TE waves; yellow intersection points correspond to complex leaky TE waves.
Photonics 10 01297 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smolkin, E.; Smirnov, Y. Numerical Study of the Spectrum of TE-Polarized Electromagnetic Waves of a Goubau Line Coated with Graphene. Photonics 2023, 10, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121297

AMA Style

Smolkin E, Smirnov Y. Numerical Study of the Spectrum of TE-Polarized Electromagnetic Waves of a Goubau Line Coated with Graphene. Photonics. 2023; 10(12):1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smolkin, Eugen, and Yury Smirnov. 2023. "Numerical Study of the Spectrum of TE-Polarized Electromagnetic Waves of a Goubau Line Coated with Graphene" Photonics 10, no. 12: 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121297

APA Style

Smolkin, E., & Smirnov, Y. (2023). Numerical Study of the Spectrum of TE-Polarized Electromagnetic Waves of a Goubau Line Coated with Graphene. Photonics, 10(12), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop