Next Article in Journal
Photonic Signal Processing in Phase-Coded Lidar System
Next Article in Special Issue
Conditions for Minimizing the Computational Complexity of the RCWA Calculation of the Diffraction Efficiency of Sawtooth Two-Layer Double-Relief Microstructures
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Influence of Underwater LED Illumination on Bidirectional Underwater Wireless Optical Communication
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystalline Flat Surface Recovered by High-Temperature Annealing after Laser Ablation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Calcination-Enhanced Laser-Induced Damage Threshold of 3D Micro-Optics Made with Laser Multi-Photon Lithography

by
Darius Gailevicius
1,
Rokas Zvirblis
1,
Karolis Galvanauskas
1,
Gintare Bataviciute
2 and
Mangirdas Malinauskas
1,*
1
Laser Research Center, Vilnius University, Sauletekio Av. 10, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
LIDARIS Ltd., Sauletekio Av. 10, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(5), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050597
Submission received: 25 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 21 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Computational Optics)

Abstract

:
Laser Direct Writing (LDW), also known as 3D multi-photon laser lithography of resins, is a promising technique for fabricating complex free-form elements, including micro-optical functional components. Regular organic or hybrid (organic–inorganic) resins are often used, with the latter exhibiting better optical characteristics, as well as having the option to be heat-treated into inorganic glass-like structures particularly useful for resilient micro-optics. This work is a continuation of our SZ2080™ calcination development of micro-optics, specifically studying the Laser-Induced Damage Threshold (LIDT). Such sol–gel-derived glass 3D micro-structures, particularly those that undergo heat treatment, have not been well-characterized in this respect. In this pilot study, we investigated the LIDT using the Series-on-One (S-on-1) protocol of functional micro-lenses produced via LDW and subsequently calcinated. Our results demonstrate that the LIDT can be significantly increased, even multiple times, by this approach, thus enhancing the resilience and usefulness of these free-form micro-optics. This work represents the first investigation in terms of LIDT into the impact of calcination on LDW-produced, sol–gel-derived glass micro-structures and provides important insights for the development of robust micro-optical devices.

1. Introduction

The field of laser multi-photon lithography, also known as Laser Direct Writing (LDW), is witnessing rapid progress [1], with an increasing number of micro-optical devices [2] being produced at the micro-scale. These devices include conventional [3] and Fresnel micro-lenses [4], holographic elements [5], polarization-controlled lens arrays [6], meta-optics [7], and multi-component systems [8], most notably, micro-objectives [9], non-linear excitation imaging systems [10], as well as anti-reflective-coated complex systems [11]. Furthermore, grayscale lithography has been utilized to create step-free micro-lens systems either by using increased resolution [12] or variable laser fluence [13]. The LDW method may also be used as an alternative for “classic” lithography, especially flexible maskless diffractive imaging systems [14]. Furthermore, precise systems such as microfluidic devices with complex geometries and high aspect ratios [15], as well as actively tunable photonic crystals with sub-micron features [16], also benefit from LDW.
Distinct benefits of the LDW method are its <200 nm resolution [17]; the ease of manufacturing compared to traditional methods in the micro- and nano-scale; the vast availability of organic and hybrid resins; and various post-processing steps, such as optical coating deposition [11] and calcination into inorganic glass [18,19,20]. However, one problem that has been often overlooked with micro-optics produced by LDW is their laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) behavior. This can pose a significant limitation for applications that involve modern high-intensity pico- and femtosecond pulses since high LIDT is not always guaranteed.
Classical measurement of LIDT for coating (thin film) and bulk objects is standardized [21] and industrially beneficial; however, it is rarely utilized for LDW-fabricated elements. Several attempts have been made to measure such elemental LIDT, and the results have shown variations based on various factors, such as the resin type used (organic or hybrid) [22,23,24], the presence of a photo-initiator (PI) [25], and the type of structure produced, whether it is a thin-film [24] or bulk object [26] or a free-form device [27,28]. While some methods can increase LIDT, such as using resins without PI [29] or a less organic composition [30], we propose an alternative approach. We aim to create purely inorganic structures using a heat-based post-processing method (calcination) while retaining the benefits of the LDW method [31].
For hybrid prepolymers such as SZ2080™ [32], calcination above 1000 °C results in an inorganic composite glass or glass–ceramic phase while retaining the printed geometry with homogeneous and repeatable shrinking [33]. It is often assumed that transparent glassy structures should feature higher LIDT values and, therefore, must be more resilient to high-intensity radiation, but this idea has not been tested before [27]. However, highly mechanically resilient silicon oxycarbide structures have already been fabricated by utilizing calcination [34].
In this paper, we aim to fabricate suspended and functional structures—namely, micro-lenses—heat-treat them, and confirm the useful increase in LIDT. Figure 1 illustrates the process and the resulting structures.

2. Fabrication

To produce the lenses, we used the low-shrinkage organic–inorganic prepolymer SZ2080™ [35]. The preparation and exposure conditions (Figure 1a) were selected following the methodology reported in [35], using a 63x 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat immersion oil objective (Zeiss), 517 ± 10 nm wavelength, and 144 fs pulse duration with a repetition rate of 76 MHz. Scanning speed was set to 2000 μ m/s utilizing Aerotech IFOV technology; beam intensity was −0.4 TW/cm2. Development was carried out in Methyl isobutyl ketone for 15 min. The lenses were printed on a quartz substrate, with the final baseline geometry being a plano-convex, 50 μ m diameter, 300 μ m focal length lens with a thickness of approximately 2 μ m. To support the lenses above the quartz substrate, pillars were printed with an inclination angle of 35° [33] and a total height close to 30 μ m, giving us pristine non-calcinated (NCA) lenses. Heat treatment was performed at 1100 ° C with a rise time of 12 h and held for 3 h, resulting in calcinated (CA) lenses. Transitional reactions with the ambient atmosphere and carbon-induced darkening are expected at around 500–600 ° C. The final transparent phase, characterized in this work, is generated at the highest treatment temperature. (Figure 1b overviews the calcination transition).

3. LIDT Metrology

Non-calcinated (NCA) and calcinated (CA) samples were qualitatively examined and exposed to the probe beam in damage tests in an array form (Figure 1c). Qualitative characterization of their ability to form an image of an object placed under microscope illumination was performed in a bright-field microscope to confirm their imaging function before and after LIDT measurements. See Figure 2a for the illustrated concept. The imaging function was used to confirm the occurrence of significant and catastrophic damage events (Figure 2b–e). After, they were characterized using a Scanning Electron Microscope (Model Hitachi TM1000 SEM, Figure 3).
Tests were performed on arrays of micro-lenses. Arrays, mainly composed of 16 lenses, were divided in half to account for damage experiments for NCA (reference) and CA (test) micro-optics. Tests were performed in the following sequence: an array of lenses was printed; half of the lenses were exposed before calcination; then, the array was calcinated as described previously; and finally, the second half of the lenses was exposed. The laser system parameters used for all experiments were as follows: wavelength λ 1 = 1030 nm and λ 2 = 515 nm, repetition rate f = 200 kHz, pulse duration τ = 300 fs, Plan-Apochromat Zeiss 20x objective (0.8 NA). S-on-1 damage tests [21] were performed with both wavelengths, exposing the lenses for 50 ms and 5 s, corresponding to 10,000-on-1 and 1,000,000-on-1 pulses.
S-on-1 testing was applied in two regimes (as illustrated in Figure 3f) by varying the applied beam diameter. The first regime is referred to as a local-damage protocol, where the beam diameter is around 4 μ m ( 1 / e 2 intensity level) on the sample. The second regime is referred to as delocalized, where the probe beam diameter is 20 μ m, attained by shifting the (relative to the lens) focus position of the laser beam. The delocalized regime was used to demonstrate the expected behavior where the full aperture of the lens is used, such as in high-intensity focusing, while the local regime shows the behavior of a highly focused laser beam on the optics themselves.

4. Results

4.1. Morphology

The morphology of the observed damage is depicted in Figure 3. It shows an example of a pristine lens (Figure 3a) with a diameter of 50 μ m that shrinks to 30 μ m (40% shrinkage, expected and matching [33]) after calcination. The localized damage regime results in small (<1 μ m) damage sites, while the delocalized-damage regime produces large (approx. 10 μ m) damage sites for NCA lenses (Figure 3b). The latter results in catastrophic damage, as most of the aperture becomes distorted and the lenses lose their imaging function. However, CA lenses, as shown in Figure 3d,e, retain their imaging function and exhibit small-diameter ablation sites similar to those produced by fs-laser surface ablation [36]. The morphology does not vary significantly depending on the wavelength used. The only observed difference for NCA lenses is the prominent brown discoloration, particularly for λ = 1030 nm. Previous research by Jonusauskas et al. [37] had concluded that the damage mode of non-calcinated SZ2080™ structures in the femtosecond regime is volume heat accumulation. By its nature, SZ2080™ should have a similar heat conductance to other hybrid polymers such as PDMS ([38], 0.2 W/m*K) or Ormocomp (0.4 W/m*K estimated from [39]). It was suggested that better heat load mitigation might increase LIDT. Butkute et al. [27] explained the phenomena as Coulomb explosion-driven dielectric breakdown. In both cases, calcinated Si-Zr glass micro-structures excel in LIDT by potentially having better heat transfer characteristics (SiO2-ZrO2 composites [40] 1 to 3 W/m*K). In addition, the minimum bond energy for Si-O (89 kcal/mol) bond in glass is higher than for C-C (80 kcal/mol) or C-O (79 kcal/mol) bonds that constitute the weaker link [41].

4.2. LIDT Values

Figure 4 presents results of LIDT measurements, which include a combination of localized and non-localized damage regimes for NCA and CA lenses, as well as exposure to 10 4 -on-1 and 10 6 -on-1 pulses at 515 and 1030 nm wavelengths. The LIDT of NCA lenses at the localized regime was measured to be F = 0.12–0.17 J/cm 2 and F = 0.6–0.8 J/cm 2 at 515 and 1030 nm, respectively. The delocalized regime resulted in LIDT values of F = 0.07–0.08 J/cm 2 and F = 0.28–0.31 J/cm 2 .
The results show that local regime LIDT values in calcinated micro-optics exhibit the highest increase. Using a 300 fs laser pulse duration at 1030 nm, a 3-fold increase in the laser-induced damage threshold was observed, from F = 0.6–0.8 J/cm 2 to F = 2.3–2.7 J/cm 2 . This increase was the highest among all measured values and was consistent across the entire exposure duration range from 50 ms to 5 s. The use of a second harmonic (515 nm) resulted in the highest percentile increase in measured LIDT, with a 6-fold increase in LIDT observed across all exposure durations, from F = 0.12–0.17 J/cm 2 to F = 0.8–0.9 J/cm 2 .
However, when exposed in the delocalized regime, with an increased exposure area on the CA lens compared to NCA counterparts, a decrease in measured damage thresholds is observed. For the 1030 nm wavelength, the effect of calcination was less pronounced, with only a 1.5 times increase in LIDT observed from F = 0.28–0.31 J/cm 2 for NCA to F = 0.38–0.47 J/cm 2 for calcinated lenses, while a 515 nm wavelength exhibited a 2.7 times increase in LIDT—from F = 0.07–0.08 J/cm 2 for NCA to F = 0.19–0.21 J/cm 2 for CA lenses.

5. Discussion

The results provided above are interesting in multiple ways. To begin with, the LIDT values for NCA localized damage regimes were consistent with previously reported scientific data, with F 1030 = 0.57 J/cm 2 and F 515 = 0.13 J/cm 2 [24,25,30]. Secondly, the reported CA values exceed all known previous observations for NCA SZ2080™, consistently and regardless of irradiation area or testing process. Our findings demonstrate a significant increase in damage threshold, reaching a 3-6 times increase as a conservative estimate, which supersedes all measured values before. The maximum measured LIDT value at λ = 1030 nm is F = 2.74 J / cm 2 , which is relatively large and approaches the level of fused silica [26] F = 3.11 J / cm 2 .
In contrast, the LIDT measured using the non-localized regime is lower compared to known reported values [24,25,30]. The previous experiments that employed S-on-1 damage testing protocols only exposed the samples to up to 1000 pulses. The current tests featured at least by an order larger pulse amounts ( 10 4 -on-1 and 10 6 -on-1 protocols). Therefore, current measurements of the degradation effects in time offer a novel insight into calcinated hybrid polymer fatigue behavior.

6. Conclusions

In this study, we have reported laser-induced damage threshold measurements of SZ2080™ material after calcination for the first time. Our findings demonstrate a significant increase in damage threshold, reaching 3–6 times as a conservative estimate, which supersedes all measured values before. These results are promising, as they suggest that the LDW method combined with heat treatment can offer a technologically viable pathway to producing optical-grade glass-level performance in micro-optical elements for use in harsh environments in visible and IR wavelengths, as previously postulated.
As this pilot study covers only femtosecond LIDTs, further research is needed for other significant regimes, such as the nanosecond and continuous-wave damage tests. In summary, our findings contribute to the field by providing new insights into the performance of SZ2080™ material after calcination and offer exciting possibilities for the development of high-performance micro-optical elements. Furthermore, increased LIDT usually results in an increase in the optics’ useful lifetime, particularly useful in femtosecond applications [42]. Finally, increased fluence pump sources may be utilized in Glass-on-Glass [43] LDW fabricated micro-lasers, consisting of high-resilience polymers [44].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G. and M.M.; methodology, D.G.; software, R.Z.; validation, K.G.; formal analysis, D.G., K.G., G.B. and M.M.; investigation, R.Z.; resources, D.G. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.G.; writing—review and editing, K.G., G.B. and M.M.; visualization, R.Z.; supervision, D.G. and M.M.; project administration, M.M.; funding acquisition, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from EU Horizon 2020, Research and Innovation program LASERLAB-EUROPE JRA Project No. 871124.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Maria Farsari and Vasileia Melissinaki for kindly providing the authors with the SZ2080™ (IESL-FORTH, Heraklion, Greece) hybrid organic–inorganic materials for performing the described experiments. We thank Andrius Melninkaitis (Vilnius University, Faculty of Physics, Laser Research Center/LIDARIS Ltd.) for consultation regarding LIDT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Dr. Gintare Bataviciute is employed by LIDARIS Ltd.; there is no conflict of interest with the company, since LIDT testing was conducted in-house.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
LIDTLaser-Induced Damage Threshold
LDWLaser Direct Writing
S-on-1Series-on-One
PIPhoto-Initiator
CACalcinated
NCANon-Calcinated
SEMScanning Electron Microscope

References

  1. Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Ladika, D.; Yu, H.; Gailevičius, D.; Wang, H.; Pan, C.; Nair, P.N.; Ke, Y.; Mori, T.; et al. Two-photon polymerization lithography for optics and Photonics: Fundamentals, materials, technologies, and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2214211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gonzalez-Hernandez, D.; Varapnickas, S.; Bertoncini, A.; Liberale, C.; Malinauskas, M. Micro-Optics 3D printed via multi-photon laser lithography. Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 11, 2201701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, D.; Chen, Q.D.; Niu, L.G.; Jiao, J.; Xia, H.; Song, J.F.; Sun, H.B. 100% Fill-Factor Aspheric Microlens Arrays (AMLA) With Sub-20-nm Precision. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2009, 21, 1535–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Asadollahbaik, A.; Thiele, S.; Weber, K.; Kumar, A.; Drozella, J.; Sterl, F.; Herkommer, A.M.; Giessen, H.; Fick, J. Highly Efficient Dual-Fiber Optical Trapping with 3D Printed Diffractive Fresnel Lenses. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sandford O’Neill, J.; Salter, P.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, B.; Daginawalla, H.; Booth, M.J.; Elston, S.J.; Morris, S.M. 3D Switchable Diffractive Optical Elements Fabricated with Two-Photon Polymerization. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2102446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mu, H.; Smith, D.; Katkus, T.; Gailevičius, D.; Malinauskas, M.; Nishijima, Y.; Stoddart, P.R.; Ruan, D.; Ryu, M.; Morikawa, J.; et al. Polarisation control in arrays of Microlenses and gratings: Performance in visible–IR spectral ranges. Micromachines 2023, 14, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Faniayeu, I.; Khakhomov, S.; Semchenko, I.; Mizeikis, V. Highly transparent twist polarizer metasurface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Žukauskas, A.; Malinauskas, M.; Brasselet, E. Monolithic generators of pseudo-nondiffracting optical vortex beams at the microscale. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 181122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thiele, S.; Arzenbacher, K.; Gissibl, T.; Giessen, H.; Herkommer, A.M. 3D-printed eagle eye: Compound microlens system for foveated imaging. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marini, M.; Nardini, A.; Martínez Vázquez, R.; Conci, C.; Bouzin, M.; Collini, M.; Osellame, R.; Cerullo, G.; Kariman, B.S.; Farsari, M.; et al. Microlenses fabricated by two-photon laser polymerization for cell imaging with non-linear excitation microscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2213926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Galvanauskas, K.; Astrauskyte, D.; Balcas, G.; Gailevičius, D.; Grineviciute, L.; Malinauskas, M. High-transparency 3D micro-optics of hybrid-polymer SZ2080™ made via Ultrafast Laser Nanolithography and atomic layer deposition. Opt. Open 2023, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siegle, L.; Ristok, S.; Giessen, H. Complex aspherical singlet and Doublet Microoptics by Grayscale 3D printing. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gonzalez-Hernandez, D.; Sanchez-Padilla, B.; Gailevicius, D.; Chandran Thodika, S.; Brasselet, E.; Malinauskas, M. Single-step 3D printing of micro-optics with adjustable refractiveindex by ultrafast laser nanolithography. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 2300258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gopinath, S.; Angamuthu, P.P.; Kahro, T.; Bleahu, A.; Arockiaraj, F.G.; Smith, D.; Ng, S.H.; Juodkazis, S.; Kukli, K.; Tamm, A.; et al. Implementation of a large-area diffractive lens using multiple sub-aperture diffractive lenses and computational reconstruction. Photonics 2022, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. LaFratta, C.N.; Simoska, O.; Pelse, I.; Weng, S.; Ingram, M. A convenient direct laser writing system for the creation of Microfluidic Masters. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2015, 19, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Y.; Miles, B.T.; Ho, Y.L.D.; Taverne, M.P.; Chen, L.; Gersen, H.; Rarity, J.G.; Faul, C.F. Toward direct laser writing of actively tuneable 3D photonic crystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 5, 1600458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fischer, J.; Wegener, M. Three-dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 7, 22–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vyatskikh, A.; Ng, R.C.; Edwards, B.; Briggs, R.M.; Greer, J.R. Additive manufacturing of high-refractive-index, nanoarchitected titanium dioxide for 3D dielectric photonic crystals. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 3513–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hong, Z.; Ye, P.; Loy, D.A.; Liang, R. High-precision printing of complex glass imaging optics with precondensed liquid silica resin. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2105595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hong, Z.; Ye, P.; Loy, D.A.; Liang, R. Three-dimensional printing of glass micro-optics. Optica 2021, 8, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. ISO 21254-2:2011; Lasers and Laser-Related Equipment—Test Methods for Laser-Induced Damage Threshold. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  22. Stankova, N.; Atanasov, P.; Nikov, R.; Nikov, R.; Nedyalkov, N.; Stoyanchov, T.; Fukata, N.; Kolev, K.; Valova, E.; Georgieva, J.; et al. Optical properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) during nanosecond laser processing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 374, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saha, S.K.; Divin, C.; Cuadra, J.A.; Panas, R.M. Effect of proximity of features on the damage threshold during submicron additive manufacturing via two-photon polymerization. J. Micro-Nano-Manuf. 2017, 5, 031002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Žukauskas, A.; Batavičiūtė, G.; Ščiuka, M.; Jukna, T.; Melninkaitis, A.; Malinauskas, M. Characterization of photopolymers used in laser 3D micro/nanolithography by means of laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT). Opt. Mater. Express 2014, 4, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Žukauskas, A.; Batavičiūtė, G.; Ščiuka, M.; Balevičius, Z.; Melninkaitis, A.; Malinauskas, M. Effect of the photoinitiator presence and exposure conditions on laser-induced damage threshold of ORMOSIL (SZ2080). Opt. Mater. 2015, 39, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gallais, L.; Commandré, M. Laser-induced damage thresholds of bulk and coating optical materials at 1030 nm, 500 fs. Appl. Opt. 2014, 53, A186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Butkutė, A.; Čekanavičius, L.; Rimšelis, G.; Gailevičius, D.; Mizeikis, V.; Melninkaitis, A.; Baldacchini, T.; Jonušauskas, L.; Malinauskas, M. Optical damage thresholds of microstructures made by laser three-dimensional nanolithography. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Simakov, E.; Gilbertson, R.; Herman, M.; Pilania, G.; Shchegolkov, D.; Walker, E.; England, R.; Wootton, K. Possibilities for Fabricating Polymer Dielectric Laser Accelerator Structures with Additive Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 9th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29 April–4 May 2018; pp. 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Samsonas, D.; Skliutas, E.; Ciburys, A.; Kontenis, L.; Gailevičius, D.; Berzinš, J.; Narbutis, D.; Jukna, V.; Vengris, M.; Juodkazis, S.; et al. 3D nanopolymerization and damage threshold dependence on laser wavelength and pulse duration. Nanophotonics 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kabouraki, E.; Melissinaki, V.; Yadav, A.; Melninkaitis, A.; Tourlouki, K.; Tachtsidis, T.; Kehagias, N.; Barmparis, G.D.; Papazoglou, D.G.; Rafailov, E.; et al. High laser induced damage threshold photoresists for nano-imprint and 3D multi-photon lithography. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 3759–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Merkininkaitė, G.; Aleksandravičius, E.; Malinauskas, M.; Gailevičius, D.; Šakirzanovas, S. Laser additive manufacturing of SiZrO2 tunable crystalline phase 3D nanostructures. Opto-Electr. Adv. 2022, 5, 210077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ovsianikov, A.; Viertl, J.; Chichkov, B.; Oubaha, M.; MacCraith, B.; Sakellari, I.; Giakoumaki, A.; Gray, D.; Vamvakaki, M.; Farsari, M.; et al. Ultra-Low Shrinkage Hybrid Photosensitive Material for Two-Photon Polymerization Microfabrication. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 2257–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonzalez-Hernandez, D.; Varapnickas, S.; Merkininkaitė, G.; Čiburys, A.; Gailevičius, D.; Šakirzanovas, S.; Juodkazis, S.; Malinauskas, M. Laser 3D Printing of Inorganic Free-Form Micro-Optics. Photonics 2021, 8, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Merkinaite, G.; Gailevicius, D.; Staisiunas, L.; Ezerskyte, E.; Vargalis, R.; Malinauskas, M.; Sakirzanovas, S. Additive Manufacturing of Extremely Hard SiOC Ceramic 3D Micro-Structures. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Butkus, A.; Skliutas, E.; Gailevičius, D.; Malinauskas, M. Femtosecond-laser direct writing 3D micro/nano-lithography using VIS-light oscillator. J. Cent. South Univ. 2022, 29, 3270–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garrison, B.J.; Srinivasan, R. Laser ablation of organic polymers: Microscopic models for photochemical and thermal processes. J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 57, 2909–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jonusauskas, L.; Gailevicius, D.; Mikoliunaite, L.; Sakalauskas, D.; Šakirzanovas, S.; Juodkazis, S.; Malinauskas, M. Optically clear and resilient free-form u-optics 3D-printed via Ultrafast Laser Lithography. Materials 2017, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vlassov, S.; Oras, S.; Timusk, M.; Zadin, V.; Tiirats, T.; Sosnin, I.M.; Lõhmus, R.; Linarts, A.; Kyritsakis, A.; Dorogin, L.M.; et al. Thermal, mechanical, and acoustic properties of polydimethylsiloxane filled with hollow glass microspheres. Materials 2022, 15, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. OrmoComp®. Available online: https://www.microresist.de/en/produkt/ormocomp/ (accessed on 24 April 2023).
  40. Chang, C.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chang, C.H.; Liu, F.H.; Huang, Y.T.; Liao, Y.S. Enhanced biomedical applicability of zro2–sio2 ceramic composites in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barkaline, V.V.; Nelayev, V.V.; Chashinski, A.S. SIO2 on CNT: Molecular dynamics simulation. SPIE Proc. 2006, 6253, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smalakys, L.; Melninkaitis, A. Predicting lifetime of optical components with bayesian inference. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ward, J.M.; Yang, Y.; Nic Chormaic, S. Glass-on-glass fabrication of bottle-shaped tunable microlasers and their applications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Balcas, G.; Malinauskas, F.; Maria, G.; Juodkazis, S. Fabrication of glass-ceramic 3D micro-optics by combining laser lithography and calcination. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2215230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The experimental principle: (a) the fabrication of the test lens structure in resin, (b) heat treatment of the structure and compliant columns, (c) the exposure of the structures to measure the LIDT values. Represented here: delocalized LIDT regime and an array of micro-lenses tested.
Figure 1. The experimental principle: (a) the fabrication of the test lens structure in resin, (b) heat treatment of the structure and compliant columns, (c) the exposure of the structures to measure the LIDT values. Represented here: delocalized LIDT regime and an array of micro-lenses tested.
Photonics 10 00597 g001
Figure 2. Optical characterization of micro-optics using an inverted microscope: (a) image of the surface of the optic components, (b) an image of the focal position (300 μ m) of the same micro-optics, (c) bright-field image after LIDT testing, (d) degradation in image quality in the focal position of damaged lenses, (e) bright-field image after calcination and LIDT testing.
Figure 2. Optical characterization of micro-optics using an inverted microscope: (a) image of the surface of the optic components, (b) an image of the focal position (300 μ m) of the same micro-optics, (c) bright-field image after LIDT testing, (d) degradation in image quality in the focal position of damaged lenses, (e) bright-field image after calcination and LIDT testing.
Photonics 10 00597 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of micro-lenses, illustrating the typical damage morphologies observed: (a) image of a pristine (untested) NCA lens, (b) local damage regime-tested NCA lens, (c) delocalized damage regime-tested NCA lens, (d) localised and delocalised regime laser spot diameter representation, (e) local regime-tested CA lens, (f) delocalized regime-tested CA lens. Tracks are formed around the damage sites for easier visualization.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of micro-lenses, illustrating the typical damage morphologies observed: (a) image of a pristine (untested) NCA lens, (b) local damage regime-tested NCA lens, (c) delocalized damage regime-tested NCA lens, (d) localised and delocalised regime laser spot diameter representation, (e) local regime-tested CA lens, (f) delocalized regime-tested CA lens. Tracks are formed around the damage sites for easier visualization.
Photonics 10 00597 g003
Figure 4. Damage threshold measurement results for (a) localized damage protocol, (b) non-localized damage protocol.
Figure 4. Damage threshold measurement results for (a) localized damage protocol, (b) non-localized damage protocol.
Photonics 10 00597 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gailevicius, D.; Zvirblis, R.; Galvanauskas, K.; Bataviciute, G.; Malinauskas, M. Calcination-Enhanced Laser-Induced Damage Threshold of 3D Micro-Optics Made with Laser Multi-Photon Lithography. Photonics 2023, 10, 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050597

AMA Style

Gailevicius D, Zvirblis R, Galvanauskas K, Bataviciute G, Malinauskas M. Calcination-Enhanced Laser-Induced Damage Threshold of 3D Micro-Optics Made with Laser Multi-Photon Lithography. Photonics. 2023; 10(5):597. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050597

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gailevicius, Darius, Rokas Zvirblis, Karolis Galvanauskas, Gintare Bataviciute, and Mangirdas Malinauskas. 2023. "Calcination-Enhanced Laser-Induced Damage Threshold of 3D Micro-Optics Made with Laser Multi-Photon Lithography" Photonics 10, no. 5: 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050597

APA Style

Gailevicius, D., Zvirblis, R., Galvanauskas, K., Bataviciute, G., & Malinauskas, M. (2023). Calcination-Enhanced Laser-Induced Damage Threshold of 3D Micro-Optics Made with Laser Multi-Photon Lithography. Photonics, 10(5), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050597

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop