Next Article in Journal
Flexible Terahertz Metamaterials Absorber based on VO2
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolving Role of Lasers in Endourology: Past, Present and Future of Lasers
Previous Article in Journal
High–Power 792 nm Fiber–Coupled Semiconductor Laser
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alexandrite and Nd:YAG Laser vs. IPL in the Management of Facial Hirsutism: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Photonics
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/photonics10060620
photonics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seven-Grooved-Rod, Side-Pumping Concept for Highly Efficient TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Emission through Fresnel Lenses

by
Hugo Costa
,
Dawei Liang
*,
Joana Almeida
,
Miguel Catela
,
Dário Garcia
,
Bruno D. Tibúrcio
and
Cláudia R. Vistas
Centre of Physics and Technological Research, Physics Department, NOVA School of Science and Technology, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(6), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060620
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lasers and Dynamic of Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Low-cost, lightweight, and easily available Fresnel lenses are a more alluring choice for solar laser power production, when compared to the costly and complex heliostat-parabolic mirror systems. Therefore, a seven-rod solar laser head was designed and numerically studied to enhance the efficiency in TEM00-mode laser power production, employing six Fresnel lenses with 10 m2 total collection area for collection and concentration of sunlight. Six folding mirrors redirected the solar rays towards the laser head, composed of six fused silica aspheric lenses and rectangular compound parabolic concentrators paired together for further concentration, and a cylindrical cavity, in which seven Nd:YAG rods were mounted and side-pumped. With conventional rods, total TEM00-mode laser power reached 139.89 W, which is equivalent to 13.99 W/m2 collection efficiency and 1.47% solar-to-TEM00-mode laser power conversion efficiency. More importantly, by implementing rods with grooved sidewalls, the total laser power was increased to 153.29 W, corresponding to 15.33 W/m2 collection and 1.61% conversion efficiencies. The side-pumping configuration and the good thermal performance may ensure that the seven-grooved-rod system has better scalability than other previously proposed schemes.

1. Introduction

The global energy crisis triggered an increasing interest in the adoption of renewable power, potentially making it surpass coal as the predominant source of electricity production in the near future, while helping to limit global warming to 1.5 °C [1]. Amid a multitude of renewable energy resources, solar is one of the most exploitable ones, with its field experiencing extensive development in recent years, mainly in photovoltaics [2]. Since the 1960s [3,4], natural sunlight has also been used to produce narrowband, collimated laser radiation in an efficient, simple, and reliable way, obviating the need for artificial pumping sources and their electrical power consumption and conditioning equipment. Solar laser is an emerging technology for both renewable energy and laser-based research and has been investigated as an instrument for materials processing [5] and optical communications [6], while showing great promise for space-based applications, such as wireless power transmission [7], deep-space optical data transmission and networking [8], laser propulsion [9], and asteroid deflection [10].
Even though solar laser emission is possible without any focusing optics [11], collectors and concentrators are normally employed to excite the active medium and obtain high efficiency. However, when using these components, the laser crystal is subjected to high power radiation, running the risk of experiencing significant thermal lens and thermal stress effects [12]. This has sparked researchers to look for ways to ameliorate the conditions for solar laser power production and reduce the probability of rod fracture, while being mindful of the laser efficiency. For example:
  • Nd:YAG proved to be a great rod material for highly intense solar pumping due to its availability, reasonably low cost, good thermomechanical properties [13], and spectroscopic properties of the dopant [14]. Sensitizers of the Nd3+ ion emission, such as Cr3+ and Ce3+ ions, can also be added as co-dopants in the doped YAG host to increase the laser efficiency through the higher sunlight absorption and subsequent transfer of the excitation energy to the Nd3+ ions [15,16].
  • Better heat dissipation and lessening of the thermal lens effect can be achieved through grooved rods, rather than the conventional rods with smooth sidewalls, since the area of contact between the laser medium and the cooling water is increased due to the shape of its sidewall, improving the laser efficiency and beam quality [17].
  • Multi-rod solar laser systems can facilitate an equal distribution of the total amount of concentrated radiation among the several rods [18,19,20]. This way, substantial improvement of the thermal performance can be achieved, in comparison with the single, thicker rod systems. The coordination of multiple laser beams, with each one being optimized to perform a part of the overall procedure, has also produced results that were unobtainable with a single beam in various laser-based applications [21,22,23,24,25].
  • Designing a solar laser system in side-pumping configuration can be constituted as a solution to provide alleviation of the thermal loading issue owed to the non-uniformity of the pump light distribution along the rod axis that is ubiquitous in the end-side-pumping approach, despite the latter being the configuration that has also led to record-breaking efficiencies [15,20,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Furthermore, the free access to both rod ends enables the optimization of more laser resonator parameters, permitting an efficient extraction of laser at low-order modes with improved beam quality [33,34,35,36,37]. This is of great significance for many laser-based applications in which the operation in TEM00-mode is desired due to the low divergence of the laser beam, allowing for a small, focused spot [38]. Damage in the resonator optics could also be prevented as a result of its smooth profile, avoiding the appearance of hot sites inside the laser medium [39].
The most significant results were achieved through heliostat-parabolic mirror systems. In 2017, 9.30 W continuous-wave (cw) TEM00-mode laser power was obtained by using a 1.18 m2 effective collection area and a solar laser head composed of a fused silica aspheric lens and a conical pump cavity, in which a single Nd:YAG rod was mounted and end-side-pumped [30]. This corresponded to 7.88 W/m2 collection and 0.79% solar-to-TEM00-mode-laser power conversion efficiencies. For multimode operation, the current record values were established in 2022 with the production of 16.50 W cw laser power from a 0.40 m2 effective collection area and a similar laser head, this time with three Ce:Nd:YAG rods within the single pump cavity, with collection and conversion efficiencies reaching 41.25 W/m2 and 4.64% [20], respectively. Nevertheless, using heliostat-parabolic mirror systems comes with a few drawbacks: namely, the need for complex and expensive installations to accommodate heavy components, and the blockage of sunlight redirected from the heliostat through the placement of the laser head and its supporting mechanics in front of the primary concentrator.
Albeit having inherent chromatic aberration properties, the collection and concentration of solar rays can be done through low-cost, lightweight, and easily available Fresnel lenses. In 2013, 2.30 W cw TEM00-mode laser power was obtained with a 1.00 m diameter Fresnel lens to side pump a single Nd:YAG rod, fixed inside a laser head comprised of a fused silica aspheric lens, a two-dimensional compound parabolic concentrator (CPC), and a V-shaped pump cavity [40]. The collection and conversion efficiencies were only 2.93 W/m2 and 0.33%, respectively. In total, 26.93 W cw multimode laser power was produced in 2023 by end-side pumping a grooved Ce:Nd:YAG/YAG bonded crystal rod in a system that takes advantage of a 0.94 m diameter Fresnel lens and a laser head that consists of a conical cavity and a quartz tube, within which the rod was fixed [41]. This was equivalent to a 38.81 W/m2 collection efficiency and a 3.88% conversion efficiency.
Due to all the reasons mentioned above, the lack of experimental works regarding TEM00-mode solar laser power production through Fresnel lenses (the most recent one being the aforementioned from 2013 [40], to the best of our knowledge) and the importance of studying the scalability of these systems, a seven-rod, side-pumping concept is presented here. Six Fresnel lenses with 10 m2 total collection area, with the help of six folding mirrors, collected and concentrated sunlight towards a laser head composed of six aspheric lenses, six rectangular CPCs and a cylindrical pump cavity, within which seven grooved Nd:YAG rods were mounted and pumped. The design parameters were optimized using Zemax® (Kirkland, EA, USA) ray tracing in non-sequential mode and LASCAD™ software (Munich, Germany). Efficient production of 153.29 W total TEM00-mode laser power could be achieved, corresponding to a 15.33 W/m2 collection efficiency and a 1.61% solar-to-TEM00-mode-laser power conversion efficiency.

2. Description of the Seven-Rod TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Concept

The collection and first-stage concentration of solar rays were done by six Fresnel lenses, each with 0.73 m diameter and approximately 3.5 m focal length, totaling 10 m2 of collection area. They were made of polymethylmethacrylate, which is a lightweight, clear, and stable polymer that has sunlight resistance, thermal stability up to at least 80 °C, and spectral transmissivity that matches the solar spectrum [42]. Six elliptical folding mirrors, with 1.5 m height, 1.0 m width, and 95% reflectivity, were tilted 45° to redirect the concentrated solar rays towards the laser head. Figure 1 depicts how the Fresnel lenses (FL1–FL6) and folding mirrors (M1–M6) were positioned in relation to it. The six pairs were divided into two groups: one was responsible for the concentration of solar rays towards the upper section of the laser head, while the other did the same for the lower section. In the upper-section group, the Fresnel lenses FL1, FL3, and FL5 and folding mirrors M1, M3, and M5 were positioned 1799.25 mm away from the optical axis of the laser head, with FL1, FL3, and FL5 being 1637.50 mm above the middle of the laser head while M1, M3, and M5 were only 6.75 mm above (=1630.75 mm below the corresponding Fresnel lens). In the lower-section group, the Fresnel lenses FL2, FL4, and FL6 and folding mirrors M2, M4, and M6 were positioned 1785.75 mm away from the optical axis of the laser head, with FL2, FL4, and FL6 also being 1637.50 mm above the middle of the laser head, whereas M2, M4, and M6 were 6.75 mm below (=1644.25 mm below the corresponding Fresnel lens).
Both the upper and lower sections of the laser head had three aspheric lenses and three rectangular CPCs that further concentrated the solar rays towards seven grooved Nd:YAG rods mounted inside a cylindrical pump cavity (Figure 2). The six aspheric lenses, each positioned on the same plane as the center of the corresponding folding mirror and 22 mm away from the optical axis of the laser head, had an input face of 110.0 mm diameter and −59 mm radius of curvature, and a plane output face of 25.4 mm diameter and 111 mm thickness. They were designed with fused silica material, which is transparent over the absorption spectrum of Nd:YAG and acts as a filter of undesired radiation, aside from having low thermal expansion coefficient and high resistance to scratching and thermal shock [43]. A rectangular CPC was placed below each aspheric lens, with its 21.4 × 16.2 mm2 input face being 1.8 mm away from the lens’s output face. The CPCs had an output face with 12.2 × 7.8 mm2 area, 13.4 mm length, and inner mirrored walls with 95% reflectivity. The walls connecting the output edges of 12.2 mm with the input edges of 21.4 mm had an acceptance angle of 30°, whereas the walls perpendicular to those had a 26° acceptance angle.
The cylindrical pump cavity was a mirrored pipe with 15.7 mm diameter, 27.0 mm length, and 95% reflectivity. It had six 13.5 × 7.8 mm2 area openings for the entrance of solar rays, with the 7.8 mm edges being connected with those of the CPCs. Each end of the cavity was closed with a rod holder of the same diameter and reflectivity for the mechanical fixation of 4 mm of the corresponding ends of the seven 2.7 mm diameter, 35 mm length grooved Nd:YAG rods (Figure 2b). The rods, apart from the 4 mm at each end reserved for the holder, had grooves along their length (Figure 2c) akin to those on the active media utilized in previous experimental works performed by our research group [36,44]: with 0.6 mm pitch and 0.1 mm depth. Additionally, the end faces of each rod presented a coating that is antireflective (AR) to the 1064 nm laser emission wavelength. As shown in Figure 2, one rod was positioned at the center of the pump cavity (RC), while the other six were grouped into three pairs (R1 and R2, R3 and R4, and R5 and R6). Each pair was placed 5 mm away from the center of the cavity, while the optical axes of the grooved rods were 5.4 mm away from each other.
The plane output face of the aspheric lenses, the CPCs, the cylindrical pump cavity and the seven grooved rods were in direct contact with cooling water, entering from the CPCs of the upper section (CPC1, CPC3, and CPC5) and exiting from the ones at the lower section of the pump cavity (CPC2, CPC4, and CPC6) to help diminish the heat generation within the rods and the optical components.
Each of the seven laser resonators was comprised of two opposing mirrors aligned with the optical axis of the grooved rod, both with different coatings: highly reflective (HR) and partially reflective (PR) to the 1064 nm laser emission wavelength, through which the solar laser was emitted (Figure 3).

3. Numerical Modeling

3.1. Modeling of the Design Parameters of the TEM00-Mode Solar Laser System through Zemax®

Preparations to the Zemax® file prior to the design parameter optimization were done. A 950 W/m2 terrestrial solar irradiance and the 16% overlap that the Nd:YAG absorption spectrum has with the solar spectrum [45] were considered when calculating the effective pump power for each of the six light sources. After consultation of the direct standard solar spectrum for one-and-a-half air mass [46], 22 spectral irradiance values at the peak absorption wavelength for the 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG material, as well as the absorption coefficient for each of those wavelengths [47], were used as reference data for the light sources and in the glass catalog data for Nd:YAG, respectively. Both the absorption spectra and the wavelength-dependent refractive indices of fused silica and water [32] were also added to the glass catalog data to account for the absorption losses that occur in those media.
The numerical information from each rod was obtained using a detector volume. The absorbed pump power in each rod was calculated by summing up the power in each of the 87,500 voxels that the detector volume was comprised of. This number of voxels, along with 6 × 106 analysis rays, enabled the acquisition of accurate results and good image resolution from each detector. The absorbed pump flux distribution in five transversal cross-sections of the seven grooved Nd:YAG rods and in the longitudinal cross-section of rods RC and R1 is presented in Figure 4. Longitudinal profiles for rods R2–R6 were not included, as they are similar to that of rod R1. The maximum pump flux is represented in red, whereas the blue color identifies the areas of the rods where there was little or no absorption.
Each time the ray tracing finished performing, the absorbed pump flux data were exported from Zemax® to be used in the LASCAD™ software afterwards. The quantification of the thermal effects applied to the active media and the highest solar laser output power provided by the optimal resonator beam parameters in each case determined what modifications were to be made to the design parameters to possibly lead to further enhancements in TEM00-mode laser power and beam quality.

3.2. Modeling of the Laser Resonator Parameters through LASCAD™ for TEM00-Mode Laser Beam Extraction

In LASCAD™, the data analysis was done while considering a temperature-dependent stimulated emission cross-section given by:
σ T = 2.8 × 10 − 19 − 3.9 × 10 − 22 T − 300 ,
where 2.8 × 10–19 cm2 is the stimulated emission cross-section at 300 K [39], −3.9 × 10–22 cm2/K is the slope of the linear relationship between stimulated emission cross-section and temperature for the 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG medium [48], and T the maximum temperature that the rod achieved. The 230 μs fluorescence lifetime [39], the 0.002 cm–1 absorption and scattering loss for the 1.0 at.% Nd:YAG medium, and the 660 nm mean-absorbed and intensity weighted solar pump wavelength [13] were also considered.
Each laser resonator was comprised of the two mirrors with the HR and PR 1064 nm coatings (reflectivity of 99.98% and 90–99%, respectively), whose optical axes were aligned with that of the rod. The resonator length plays a crucial role in the extraction of the TEM00-mode laser beam. In short resonators, the TEM00-mode poorly matches the active region, and the laser oscillates in multiple modes, leading to high beam quality factors ( M x 2 , M y 2 ). By increasing its length, the TEM00-mode beam size within the rod also increases, along with the diffraction losses at the rod edges, leading to the elimination of higher order modes. Long resonators were chosen so that only the TEM00-mode could oscillate, improving the beam quality [39]. To facilitate the oscillation of the TEM00-mode, small diameter laser rods were used due to their behavior as apertures. The separation length and radius of curvature (RoC) of the resonator mirrors were also optimized.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the laser resonator design for the extraction of a TEM00-mode laser beam from the rods RC and R1, respectively. It is worth pointing out that the laser resonators for rods R2–R6 are similar to that of R1. To extract the most efficient TEM00-mode laser beam from rod RC, HR and PR 1064 nm mirrors with an 8000 mm RoC and a 305.6 mm separation length on each side were used; this enabled the emission of a 27.11 W laser beam with good quality factors of M x 2 = 2.25, M y 2 = 1.00. On the other hand, the laser resonators for rods R1–R6 were longer, with 850 mm RoC mirrors and 423.8 mm separation lengths, resulting in six 21.03 W laser beams with even better quality factors ( M x 2 = 1.09, M y 2 = 1.00) than those from rod RC.

4. Numerical Analysis of the Seven-Rod TEM00-Mode Solar Laser System

4.1. Laser Power Analysis

The optimization process was firstly conducted for a scheme in which conventional rods were used. After finding the parameters with which the maximum TEM00-mode laser power could be achieved, the rods were substituted by ones with grooved sidewalls. Figure 7 presents the total TEM00-mode laser power as a function of the rod length using rods with the optimal diameter of 2.7 mm for both the conventional and the grooved rod schemes. In the conventional rod scheme, the maximum total laser power was 139.89 W (=25.53 + 6 × 19.06), attained with 2.7 mm diameter and 35 mm length rods, corresponding to collection and solar-to-TEM00-mode-laser power conversion efficiencies of 13.99 W/m2 and 1.47%, respectively. However, the adoption of grooved rods of the same dimensions increased the laser power that each of the seven rods would produce, totaling 153.29 W (=27.11 + 6 × 21.03). Collection efficiency, in this case, was 15.33 W/m2, whereas the conversion efficiency reached 1.61%.

4.2. Thermal Analysis

The thermal-induced effects—heat load, temperature, and stress intensity—on rods RC and R1 from the conventional and the grooved rod schemes were analyzed through LASCAD™ and are presented in Figure 8.
Due to opting for the side-pumping configuration and how small their diameter was, the grooved rods ended up not playing a very relevant role in heat dissipation. For rod RC, the grooved sidewall provided a modicum of alleviation when compared to the conventional one, registering decreases in the maximum heat load, temperature, and stress intensity of only 8.62%, 0.37%, and 3.48%, respectively. For rod R1, the opposite scenario transpired, with the difference between values being even lower: heat load was 3.59%, temperature 0.13%, and stress intensity 3.17% higher with the grooved rod. Nevertheless, in both case studies, the stress intensity was always substantially lower than the stress fracture limit of 200 N/mm2 for the Nd:YAG material [49], reflecting a potential good performance of the rods under highly intense solar pumping.

5. Discussion

In the proposed seven-rod TEM00-mode solar laser scheme, opting for rods with grooved sidewalls instead of the conventional ones proved to be an added value to increase its efficiency, despite not being sufficiently pertinent in providing better heat dissipation. This constituted improvements in comparison to other numerical works in which Fresnel lenses were used as the collectors and primary concentrators. Table 1 summarizes the results of the present work and those from two other numerical studies of highly efficient TEM00-mode laser power production schemes by Liang et al. [50,51]:
  • A single-rod scheme, in which four Fresnel lenses with 4 m2 total collection area, with the help of folding mirrors, collected and concentrated the solar rays towards a laser head composed of four fused silica aspheric lenses with long rectangular light guides for solar flux homogenization, four hollow rectangular CPCs, and four V-shaped pump cavities, where a 3 mm diameter and 76 mm length conventional Nd:YAG rod was mounted [50].
  • A seven-rod scheme, where a single 4 m2 collection area Fresnel lens collected and concentrated the solar rays, being then received by a laser head comprised of a fused silica aspheric lens, a conical pump cavity, and seven 2.5 mm diameter and 15 mm length conventional Nd:YAG rods [51].
The proposed seven-grooved-rod scheme is 1.04 times more efficient than the single-rod scheme by Liang et al. [50], as well as being able to produce six laser beams of better quality. Moreover, thermal lens and thermal stress effects can be more pronounced in the single-rod scheme than in the one proposed here. On the other hand, the seven-rod scheme by Liang et al. produced seven laser beams of overall better quality [51]; however, not only is the proposed scheme 1.12 times more efficient, but a 4 m2 collection area Fresnel lens is also not easily available on the market, which is a major deterrent for experimental testing, as opposed to six smaller Fresnel lenses with a 10 m2 total collection area.
Due to the disposition of the rods and the side-pumping configuration, a laser beam merging could be performed in the proposed scheme to combine the six individual TEM00-mode laser beams from the external rods, with the help of folding mirrors [52], enabling the extraction of a single laser beam with higher power and better quality. However, this laser beam merging technique cannot be employed in the seven-rod scheme by Liang et al. [51], since the rod tilting and the end-side-pumping configuration do not make it possible for the folding mirrors to be mechanically fixed.

6. Conclusions

A seven-rod solar laser concept was proposed here to improve the efficiency in TEM00-mode laser power production, employing six Fresnel lenses with 10 m2 total collection area for collection and concentration of sunlight. Six folding mirrors redirected the solar rays towards the laser head comprised of six aspheric lenses, six rectangular CPCs, and a cylindrical cavity, in which seven Nd:YAG rods were mounted and side-pumped. With 2.7 mm diameter and 35 mm length conventional rods, 139.89 W total TEM00-mode laser power was numerically achieved, which is equivalent to a 13.99 W/m2 collection efficiency and a 1.47% solar-to-TEM00-mode-laser power conversion efficiency. By adopting grooved rods of the same dimensions, the total laser power was increased to 153.29 W, corresponding to 15.33 W/m2 collection and 1.61% conversion efficiencies. Regarding TEM00-mode laser power production through the usage of Fresnel lenses, the proposed seven-grooved-rod scheme is 1.04 times more efficient than the one that held the previous numerical record, in which a single conventional rod was side-pumped [50]. It is also 1.12 times more efficient than another seven-conventional-rod concept, designed in the end-side-pumping configuration [51]. Furthermore, the side-pumping configuration paired with the good thermal performance may ensure the seven-grooved-rod system has better scalability than these previously proposed schemes, as well as opening the possibility for the application of a laser beam merging technique.
The implementation of Cr:Nd:YAG [15] or Ce:Nd:YAG [16] rods could lead to further improvements in efficiency, depending on how well the absorption spectra of these materials match with the solar spectrum. The use of easily available Fresnel lenses and the possibility of producing multiple TEM00-mode laser beams of high efficiency reinforce the importance that solar lasers could have in many laser-based applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., H.C. and J.A.; methodology, H.C., D.L., J.A. and C.R.V.; software, H.C., D.L., J.A. and D.G.; validation, H.C., D.L. and J.A.; formal analysis, H.C., D.L., J.A., M.C. and B.D.T.; investigation, H.C., D.L. and J.A.; resources, D.L. and J.A.; data curation, H.C., D.L. and J.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C.; writing—review and editing, H.C., D.L., J.A., M.C., D.G., B.D.T. and C.R.V.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, D.L. and J.A.; project administration, D.L.; funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia—Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (FCT—MCTES), grant UIDB/00068/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The FCT-MCTES fellowship grants 2021.06172.BD, CEECIND/03081/2017, SFRH/BD/145322/2019, PD/BD/142827/2018, and SFRH/BPD/125116/2016 of Hugo Costa, Joana Almeida, Miguel Catela, Dário Garcia, and Cláudia R. Vistas, respectively, are acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. IEA Renewable Power’s Growth Is Being Turbocharged as Countries Seek to Strengthen Energy Security. Available online: https://www.iea.org/news/renewable-power-s-growth-is-being-turbocharged-as-countries-seek-to-strengthen-energy-security (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  2. McKinsey Renewable-Energy Development in a Net-Zero World. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/electric-power-and-natural-gas/our-insights/renewable-energy-development-in-a-net-zero-world (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  3. Kiss, Z.J.; Lewis, H.R.; Duncan, R.C., Jr. Sun Pumped Continuous Optical Maser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1963, 2, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Young, C.G. A Sun-Pumped Cw One-Watt Laser. Appl. Opt. 1966, 5, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yabe, T.; Bagheri, B.; Ohkubo, T.; Uchida, S.; Yoshida, K.; Funatsu, T.; Oishi, T.; Daito, K.; Ishioka, M.; Yasunaga, N.; et al. 100 W-Class Solar Pumped Laser for Sustainable Magnesium-Hydrogen Energy Cycle. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 083104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guan, Z.; Zhao, C.M.; Yang, S.H.; Wang, Y.; Ke, J.Y.; Zhang, H.Y. Demonstration of a Free-Space Optical Communication System Using a Solar-Pumped Laser as Signal Transmitter. Laser Phys. Lett. 2017, 14, 055804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lando, M.; Kagan, J.A.; Shimony, Y.; Kalisky, Y.Y.; Noter, Y.; Yogev, A.; Rotman, S.R.; Rosenwaks, S. Solar-Pumped Solid State Laser Program. In Proceedings of the 10th Meeting on Optical Engineering in Israel, Jerusalem, Israel, 22 September 1997; Shladov, I., Rotman, S.R., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA; Volume 3110, p. 196. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hemmati, H.; Biswas, A.; Djordjevic, I.B. Deep-Space Optical Communications: Future Perspectives and Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 99, pp. 2020–2039. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rather, J.D.G.; Gerry, E.T.; Zeiders, G.W. Investigation of Possibilities for Solar Powered High Energy Lasers in Space. NASA Tech. Rep. Serv. 1977. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820010707 (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  10. Vasile, M.; Maddock, C.A. Design of a Formation of Solar Pumped Lasers for Asteroid Deflection. Adv. Space Res. 2012, 50, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Masuda, T.; Iyoda, M.; Yasumatsu, Y.; Dottermusch, S.; Howard, I.A.; Richards, B.S.; Bisson, J.-F.; Endo, M. A Fully Planar Solar Pumped Laser Based on a Luminescent Solar Collector. Commun. Phys. 2020, 3, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hwang, I.H.; Lee, J.H. Efficiency and Threshold Pump Intensity of CW Solar-Pumped Solid-State Lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1991, 27, 2129–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weksler, M.; Shwartz, J. Solar-Pumped Solid-State Lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1988, 24, 1222–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lupei, V.; Lupei, A.; Gheorghe, C.; Ikesue, A. Emission Sensitization Processes Involving Nd3+ in YAG. J. Lumin. 2016, 170, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, D.; Vistas, C.R.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Almeida, J. Solar-Pumped Cr:Nd:YAG Ceramic Laser with 6.7% Slope Efficiency. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 185, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vistas, C.R.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Garcia, D.; Catela, M.; Costa, H.; Guillot, E. Ce:Nd:YAG Side-Pumped Solar Laser. J. Photonics Energy 2021, 11, 018001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guan, Z.; Zhao, C.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Ke, J.; Gao, F.; Zhang, H. Low Threshold and High Efficiency Solar-Pumped Laser with Fresnel Lens and a Grooved Nd:YAG Rod. In Proceedings of the High-Power Lasers and Applications VIII, Beijing, China, 9 November 2016; Li, R., Singh, U.N., Walter, R.F., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA; Volume 10016, p. 1001609. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Garcia, D.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Guillot, E.; Vistas, C.R. Simultaneous Solar Laser Emissions from Three Nd:YAG Rods within a Single Pump Cavity. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tibúrcio, B.D.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Garcia, D.; Catela, M.; Costa, H.; Vistas, C.R. Tracking Error Compensation Capacity Measurement of a Dual-Rod Side-Pumping Solar Laser. Renew. Energy 2022, 195, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liang, D.; Vistas, C.R.; Garcia, D.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Catela, M.; Costa, H.; Guillot, E.; Almeida, J. Most Efficient Simultaneous Solar Laser Emissions from Three Ce:Nd:YAG Rods within a Single Pump Cavity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 246, 111921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Olsen, F.O.; Hansen, K.S.; Nielsen, J.S. Multibeam Fiber Laser Cutting. J. Laser Appl. 2009, 21, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eifel, S.; Holtkamp, J. Multi-Beam Technology Boosts Cost Efficiency. Available online: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/industrial-laser-solutions/article/14216434/multibeam-technology-boosts-cost-efficiency (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  23. Strite, T.; Gusenko, A.; Grupp, M.; Hoult, T. Multiple Laser Beam Material Processing. Biul. Inst. Spaw. 2016, 60, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gillner, A.; Finger, J.; Gretzki, P.; Niessen, M.; Bartels, T.; Reininghaus, M. High Power Laser Processing with Ultrafast and Multi-Parallel Beams. J. Laser Micro Nanoeng. 2019, 14, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thibault, F. Multibeam Laser Marking: The Individual Traceability Enabler. Available online: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/laser-processing/article/14270572/laser-marking-the-individual-traceability-enabler (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  26. Yabe, T.; Ohkubo, T.; Uchida, S.; Yoshida, K.; Nakatsuka, M.; Funatsu, T.; Mabuti, A.; Oyama, A.; Nakagawa, K.; Oishi, T.; et al. High-Efficiency and Economical Solar-Energy-Pumped Laser with Fresnel Lens and Chromium Codoped Laser Medium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 261120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, D.; Almeida, J. Highly Efficient Solar-Pumped Nd:YAG Laser. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 26399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dinh, T.H.; Ohkubo, T.; Yabe, T.; Kuboyama, H. 120 Watt Continuous Wave Solar-Pumped Laser with a Liquid Light-Guide Lens and an Nd:YAG Rod. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, P.; Yang, S.; Zhao, C.; Guan, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; He, T. High-Efficiency Solar-Pumped Laser with a Grooved Nd:YAG Rod. Appl. Opt. 2014, 53, 3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Vistas, C.R.; Guillot, E. Solar-Pumped Nd:YAG Laser with 31.5 W/m2 Multimode and 7.9 W/m2 TEM00-Mode Collection Efficiencies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 159, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guan, Z.; Zhao, C.; Li, J.; He, D.; Zhang, H. 32.1 W/m2 Continuous Wave Solar-Pumped Laser with a Bonding Nd:YAG/YAG Rod and a Fresnel Lens. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 107, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Garcia, D.; Liang, D.; Vistas, C.R.; Costa, H.; Catela, M.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Almeida, J. Ce:Nd:YAG Solar Laser with 4.5% Solar-to-Laser Conversion Efficiency. Energies 2022, 15, 5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lando, M.; Kagan, J.; Linyekin, B.; Dobrusin, V. A Solar-Pumped Nd:YAG Laser in the High Collection Efficiency Regime. Opt. Commun. 2003, 222, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Vistas, C.R.; Guillot, E. Solar-Pumped TEM00 Mode Nd:YAG Laser by a Heliostat-Parabolic Mirror System. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 134, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Almeida, J.; Liang, D.; Vistas, C.R.; Bouadjemine, R.; Guillot, E. 5.5 W Continuous-Wave TEM00-Mode Nd:YAG Solar Laser by a Light-Guide/2V-Shaped Pump Cavity. Appl. Phys. B 2015, 121, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vistas, C.R.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Guillot, E. TEM00 Mode Nd:YAG Solar Laser by Side-Pumping a Grooved Rod. Opt. Commun. 2016, 366, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Vistas, C.R.; Oliveira, M.; Gonçalves, F.; Guillot, E. High-Efficiency Solar-Pumped TEM00-Mode Nd:YAG Laser. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 145, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Duocastella, M.; Arnold, C.B. Bessel and Annular Beams for Materials Processing. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 6, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koechner, W. Solid-State Laser Engineering, 5th ed.; Springer Series in Optical Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; Volume 1, ISBN 978-3-662-14221-9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liang, D.; Almeida, J. Solar-Pumped TEM00 Mode Nd:YAG Laser. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 25107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cai, Z.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H. Efficient 38.8 W/m2 Solar Pumped Laser with a Ce:Nd:YAG Crystal and a Fresnel Lens. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xie, W.T.; Dai, Y.J.; Wang, R.Z.; Sumathy, K. Concentrated Solar Energy Applications Using Fresnel Lenses: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2588–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bernardes, P.H.; Liang, D. Solid-State Laser Pumping by Light Guides. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vistas, C.R.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J. Solar-Pumped TEM00 Mode Laser Simple Design with a Grooved Nd:YAG Rod. Sol. Energy 2015, 122, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, B.; Changming, Z.; He, J.; Yang, S. The Study of Active Medium for Solar-Pumped Solid-State Lasers. Acta Opt. Sin. 2007, 27, 1797–1801. [Google Scholar]
  46. ASTM G173-03(2012); Standard Tables for Reference Solar Spectral Irradiances: Direct Normal and Hemispherical on 37° Tilted Surface. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  47. Prahl, S. Nd:YAG−Nd:Y3Al5O12. Available online: https://omlc.org/spectra/lasermedia/html/052.html (accessed on 14 March 2023).
  48. Dong, J.; Rapaport, A.; Bass, M.; Szipocs, F.; Ueda, K. Temperature-Dependent Stimulated Emission Cross Section and Concentration Quenching in Highly Doped Nd3+:YAG Crystals. Phys. Status Solidi 2005, 202, 2565–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Almeida, J.; Liang, D.; Vistas, C.R.; Guillot, E. Highly Efficient End-Side-Pumped Nd:YAG Solar Laser by a Heliostat–Parabolic Mirror System. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Vistas, C.R. Scalable Pumping Approach for Extracting the Maximum TEM00 Solar Laser Power. Appl. Opt. 2014, 53, 7129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Catela, M.; Garcia, D.; Costa, H.; Vistas, C.R. Seven-Rod Pumping Approach for the Most Efficient Production of TEM00 Mode Solar Laser Power by a Fresnel Lens. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2021, 143, 061004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tibúrcio, B.D.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Garcia, D.; Catela, M.; Costa, H.; Vistas, C.R. Enhancing TEM00-Mode Solar Laser with Beam Merging and Ring-Array Concentrator. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2022, 144, 061005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Photonics 10 00620 g001 550
Figure 1. Collection and first-stage concentration system composed of six Fresnel lenses (FL1–FL6), with collection area totaling 10 m2, and six folding mirrors (M1–M6) that redirected the concentrated solar rays towards the laser head. FL1, FL3, and FL5, and M1, M3, and M5 were responsible for the concentration of solar rays towards the upper section of the laser head; FL2, FL4, and FL6, and M2, M4, and M6 had the same role for the lower section.
Figure 1. Collection and first-stage concentration system composed of six Fresnel lenses (FL1–FL6), with collection area totaling 10 m2, and six folding mirrors (M1–M6) that redirected the concentrated solar rays towards the laser head. FL1, FL3, and FL5, and M1, M3, and M5 were responsible for the concentration of solar rays towards the upper section of the laser head; FL2, FL4, and FL6, and M2, M4, and M6 had the same role for the lower section.
Photonics 10 00620 g001
Photonics 10 00620 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Three-dimensional and (b) side views of the solar laser head. The rod holder from the upper section in (a) and fused silica aspheric lenses AL1, AL2, AL4, and AL5 in (b) were hidden for better visualization of the pump cavity. AL1, AL3, and AL5, and CPC1, CPC3, and CPC5 were responsible for the further concentration of solar rays in the upper section of the pump cavity; AL2, AL4, and AL6, and CPC2, CPC4, and CPC6 had the same role in the lower section. (c) End of one of the grooved rods designed in Zemax®.
Figure 2. (a) Three-dimensional and (b) side views of the solar laser head. The rod holder from the upper section in (a) and fused silica aspheric lenses AL1, AL2, AL4, and AL5 in (b) were hidden for better visualization of the pump cavity. AL1, AL3, and AL5, and CPC1, CPC3, and CPC5 were responsible for the further concentration of solar rays in the upper section of the pump cavity; AL2, AL4, and AL6, and CPC2, CPC4, and CPC6 had the same role in the lower section. (c) End of one of the grooved rods designed in Zemax®.
Photonics 10 00620 g002
Photonics 10 00620 g003 550
Figure 3. Three-dimensional view of the laser head with the laser resonators for rods RC and R1–R6.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional view of the laser head with the laser resonators for rods RC and R1–R6.
Photonics 10 00620 g003
Photonics 10 00620 g004 550
Figure 4. Absorbed pump flux distribution in five transversal cross-sections of the seven 2.7 mm diameter, 35 mm length, grooved Nd:YAG rods, as well as in the longitudinal cross-section of the rods RC and R1. L represents the position where each transversal cross-section profile was obtained.
Figure 4. Absorbed pump flux distribution in five transversal cross-sections of the seven 2.7 mm diameter, 35 mm length, grooved Nd:YAG rods, as well as in the longitudinal cross-section of the rods RC and R1. L represents the position where each transversal cross-section profile was obtained.
Photonics 10 00620 g004
Photonics 10 00620 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Laser resonator design in LASCAD™ for the extraction of a TEM00-mode laser beam from rod RC, with (b) the respective beam profile. (c) LASCAD™ window in which the laser beam quality factors M x 2 , M y 2 are presented. (d) Laser beam waist radius obtained at the PR 1064 nm output mirror, through the LASCAD™ beam propagation method.
Figure 5. (a) Laser resonator design in LASCAD™ for the extraction of a TEM00-mode laser beam from rod RC, with (b) the respective beam profile. (c) LASCAD™ window in which the laser beam quality factors M x 2 , M y 2 are presented. (d) Laser beam waist radius obtained at the PR 1064 nm output mirror, through the LASCAD™ beam propagation method.
Photonics 10 00620 g005
Photonics 10 00620 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Laser resonator design in LASCAD™ for the extraction of a TEM00-mode laser beam from rod R1, with (b) the respective beam profile. (c) LASCAD™ window in which the laser beam quality factors M x 2 , M y 2 are presented. (d) Laser beam waist radius obtained at the PR 1064 nm output mirror, through the LASCAD™ beam propagation method.
Figure 6. (a) Laser resonator design in LASCAD™ for the extraction of a TEM00-mode laser beam from rod R1, with (b) the respective beam profile. (c) LASCAD™ window in which the laser beam quality factors M x 2 , M y 2 are presented. (d) Laser beam waist radius obtained at the PR 1064 nm output mirror, through the LASCAD™ beam propagation method.
Photonics 10 00620 g006
Photonics 10 00620 g007 550
Figure 7. Total TEM00-mode laser power as a function of rod length, for the conventional and the grooved Nd:YAG rod schemes while using rods with 2.7 mm diameter.
Figure 7. Total TEM00-mode laser power as a function of rod length, for the conventional and the grooved Nd:YAG rod schemes while using rods with 2.7 mm diameter.
Photonics 10 00620 g007
Photonics 10 00620 g008 550
Figure 8. Heat load, temperature, and stress intensity for rods RC and R1 from both the conventional and the grooved Nd:YAG rod schemes.
Figure 8. Heat load, temperature, and stress intensity for rods RC and R1 from both the conventional and the grooved Nd:YAG rod schemes.
Photonics 10 00620 g008
Table
Table 1. Comparison between the results of the present work and those from [50,51].
Table 1. Comparison between the results of the present work and those from [50,51].
ParameterLiang et al. (2014) [50]Liang et al. (2021) [51]Present Work
Type of rodConventionalConventionalGrooved
Number of rods177
ConfigurationSide-pumpingEnd-side-pumpingSide-pumping
Number of Fresnel lenses416
Collection area (m2)4410
Solar irradiance (W/m2)950950950
Total TEM00-mode laser power (W)59.1054.64
(=7.85 + 6 × 7.80)		153.29
(=27.11 + 6 × 21.03)
Collection efficiency (W/m2)14.7813.6615.33
Conversion efficiency (%)1.561.441.61
M x 2 ,   M y 2 1.08, 1.431 × (1.36, 1.00)
6 × (1.00, 1.04)		1 × (2.25, 1.00)
6 × (1.09, 1.00)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costa, H.; Liang, D.; Almeida, J.; Catela, M.; Garcia, D.; Tibúrcio, B.D.; Vistas, C.R. Seven-Grooved-Rod, Side-Pumping Concept for Highly Efficient TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Emission through Fresnel Lenses. Photonics 2023, 10, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060620

AMA Style

Costa H, Liang D, Almeida J, Catela M, Garcia D, Tibúrcio BD, Vistas CR. Seven-Grooved-Rod, Side-Pumping Concept for Highly Efficient TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Emission through Fresnel Lenses. Photonics. 2023; 10(6):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costa, Hugo, Dawei Liang, Joana Almeida, Miguel Catela, Dário Garcia, Bruno D. Tibúrcio, and Cláudia R. Vistas. 2023. "Seven-Grooved-Rod, Side-Pumping Concept for Highly Efficient TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Emission through Fresnel Lenses" Photonics 10, no. 6: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060620

APA Style

Costa, H., Liang, D., Almeida, J., Catela, M., Garcia, D., Tibúrcio, B. D., & Vistas, C. R. (2023). Seven-Grooved-Rod, Side-Pumping Concept for Highly Efficient TEM00-Mode Solar Laser Emission through Fresnel Lenses. Photonics, 10(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop