TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Down Syndrome, Language, Executive Function, Attention and Memory, Brain Oscillations, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
1.2. Transcranial Photobiomodulation (t-PBM)
1.3. Innovation
1.4. Preliminary Data
2. Aims
Specific Aims
- Aim 1: To test the effect of t-PBM on resting-state EEG gamma power in individuals with DS. Hypothesis: t-PBM will increase EEG gamma power (40 Hz) significantly more than sham, as tested after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., 2 or 3 days after the final t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline, e.g., 4 weeks after the final t-PBM session).
- Aim 2: To test the effect of t-PBM on language in individuals with DS. Hypothesis: t-PBM will improve language (intelligibility, vocabulary, syntax, and grammar) significantly more than sham, as tested after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., 2 or 3 days after the final t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline, e.g., 4 weeks after the final t-PBM session).
- Aim 3: To test the effect of t-PBM on attention and memory in individuals with DS. Hypothesis: t-PBM will improve attention (decrease in reaction times) and visual memory (increase in correct matches of images) significantly more than sham, as tested after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., 2 or 3 days after the final t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline, e.g., 4 weeks after the final t-PBM session). Executive function will be used as an additional, exploratory outcome measure; however, its metrics were not defined a priori.
- Aim 4: To test the correlation between the effect of t-PBM on EEG gamma power and language and cognition in individuals with DS. Hypothesis: The increase in EEG gamma power will directly correlate with improvements in the language (intelligibility, vocabulary, syntax, and grammar) and cognition (decrease in reaction times and increase in correct matches of images).
- Exploratory aim: To test the effect of t-PBM on resting state functional connectivity in the brains of individuals with DS. Hypothesis: t-PBM will improve functional connectivity within the Default Mode Network (DMN), Salience Network (SN), Central Executive Network (CEN), and Language Network after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., 2 or 3 days after the final t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline, e.g., 4 weeks after the final t-PBM session).
3. Study Design
3.1. Inclusion Criteria
3.2. Exclusion Criteria
3.3. Source of Subjects
4. Study Procedures
4.1. Study Visits
- Pre-screen (week -1): Prior to enrolling in the study, interested individuals will be called by trained study staff for a pre-screening or sent a link to an electronic version of the eligibility survey. The trained study staff will review study details and procedures and will ask a series of questions used to assess eligibility for the study. If the individual is eligible for the study, they will be invited to a screening visit. Screening (week zero): Subjects will review the consent form with the study clinician (PI or Co-I; MDs) and be given the opportunity to ask questions. Adult subjects will then complete an Informed Consent Survey (ICS) that assesses their understanding of the study procedures. The study clinician will evaluate each adult subject’s capacity for consent. If the subject is deemed unable to provide their consent, surrogate consent may be obtained from a parent, legal guardian, health care proxy, family or spouse involved in their care, or person with durable power of attorney. Subjects will be asked a series of questions to assess eligibility for the study, including demographic information and concomitant medications and therapies. A medical history will be taken. The subject may also try on the MedX 1100 and/or EEG (without powering the devices) if there is concern that the subject may not be able to tolerate these devices, as some individuals with DS are particularly sensitive to wearing items on their heads. If the subject is eligible, they will be invited to continue to the baseline visit.
- Baseline visit (week 1): Subjects will complete a neuropsychological test battery consisting of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-II (KBIT-2), Language (Semantic Verbal Fluency and Picture Naming), Memory (List Learning, List Recall, List Recognition), and Attention (Forward Digit Span and Coding) subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), the Goldman–Fristoe Test of Articulation (GFTA), the Reaction Time (RTI), Paired Associates Learning (PAL), and Motor Screening Task (MOT) subtests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), and a Standardized Narrative Task (i.e., Wordless Picture Book). Subjects will also complete the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18). The NIS-Skin Color Scale and Clinical Global Impressions—Severity (CGI-S) Scale will be administered, since skin color is important for studies involving light. Additionally, subjects will undergo resting state EEG to measure gamma neuronal oscillations. Subjects will also have their vital signs recorded and undergo an optional resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scan. Caregivers will complete the Cognitive Scale for Down Syndrome (CS-DS), the PedsQL Young Adult Quality of Life Inventory (Acute Version), the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers—Short Version, and the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior (RSMB).
- Subjects will then be randomized (1:1) to t-PBM-NIR or t-PBM-Sham. t-PBM-NIR will be administered using MedX 1100, with five LED cluster heads for simultaneous treatment locations (i.e., two midline placements and three left side placements over cortical language areas). For subjects with head sizes too small to accommodate five diodes, one of the left side placements will be omitted. The omitted diode is the one over the left angular gyrus. For people with smaller heads, four diodes cover the same approximate area as five diodes on a larger head. The t-PBM-Sham device is identical to the t-PBM-NIR device except it does not deliver NIR.
- Treatment visits (weeks 2–7): Subjects will undergo three treatments per week for a continuous six-week period, preferably with 48 h between each treatment. Subjects will complete a total of 18 treatment sessions. The Perceived Blinding Questionnaire (PBQ) will be completed at treatments 9 and 18. Study staff will complete an intervention tracking form at each treatment visit. The Clinical Global Impressions—Severity and Improvement Scales (CGI-S) and (CGI-I) will be administered once per week during the treatment phase. A “week” is defined as three treatment visits. Short-term follow-up study visit (week 8): The short-term follow-up study visit takes place within approximately one week of the final treatment session. Subjects will complete a neuropsychological test battery consisting of the KBIT-2, the Language, Memory, and Attention subtests of the RBANS, GFTA, the RTI, PAL, and MOT subtests of the CANTAB, and a Standardized Narrative Task (i.e., Wordless Picture Book). Subjects will also complete the OSA-18. Additionally, subjects will undergo resting state EEG to measure gamma neuronal oscillations. Subjects will also have their vital signs recorded and undergo an optional rs-fMRI scan. Caregivers will complete the CS-DS, the PedsQL Young Adult Quality of Life Inventory (Acute Version), and the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers—Short Version. The CGI-S and CGI-I will be administered. Participants who opted in to the MRI portion of the study will undergo an rs-fMRI scan.
- Long-term follow-up study visit (week 12): The long-term follow-up study visit takes place approximately 4 weeks after the final treatment session. The subject and caregivers will repeat the exact same neuropsychological testing, imaging, and surveys that were completed at the short-term follow-up. Participants who opted in to the MRI portion of the study will undergo an rs-fMRI scan.
- Optional Open-Label (OL) treatment: Participants who did not show improvement in language from the study (as determined by the PI and Co-I’s) will be offered twice weekly in-office treatments for up to 6 weeks at no cost to the participant or their family. At the conclusion of OL treatment, caregivers will complete the CS-DS, the PedsQL Young Adult Quality of Life Inventory (Acute Version), and the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers—Short Version. The t-PBM device used in the OL phase is the LightForce® EXPi Deep Tissue Laser TherapyTM System, Transcranial PhotoBioModulation-1000 (tPBM-2.0), which is described in further detail in the next section. The OL is used as an incentive for participants who may be reluctant to participate due to the possibility of being assigned a sham treatment. The OL provides them guaranteed, active t-PBM, assuming they complete all study procedures and do not show significant improvement in language. The parameters are based on existing parameters used in other t-PBM studies.
4.2. t-PBM Administration
4.3. Assessments
- Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-II (KBIT-2): The KBIT-2 is a brief, individually administered assessment of verbal and nonverbal intelligence that produces a verbal, non-verbal, and composite IQ score [69].
- Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): The RBANS is a brief, individually administered battery to measure cognitive function across several domains including language, attention, visuospatial/constructional, immediate memory, and delayed memory. The current study will use subtests that assess language, memory, and attention sections. Two expressive language subtests compose the Language Index: Picture Naming and Semantic Fluency. These subtests assess an individual’s ability to name pictures and to retrieve and produce express words when given a semantic in a timed format. Low scores on these subtests indicate impaired expressive language skills. Two subtests compose the Attention Index: Digit Span and Coding. These subtests assess an individual’s ability to attend to and repeat a series of digits forward and to focus and quickly draw simple designs that are associated with a specific number. Low scores on these subtests indicate impairments in auditory attention and brief focused visual attention and processing speed. Two verbal memory subtests compose the Immediate Memory Index: List Learning and Story Memory. These subtests assess an individual’s ability to learn and recall unrelated information presented within a brief word list and related information presented in a story consisting of two sentences in length. For this study, only the List Learning subtest will be completed. Subjects will also complete List Recall and List Recognition from the Delayed Memory Index. Low scores on these subtests indicate significant difficulty use same terminology with learning, retaining, and recalling verbal information [70].
- Goldman–Fristoe Test of Articulation (GFTA): The GFTA is a brief, individually administered assessment of speech sound abilities in articulation [71]. We will use raw data because it is administered in a modified manner, not scored or administered according to the standardized procedures outlined in the published manual. This modification allows for the analysis of articulation without comparison to normative standards.
- Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior (RSMB): The RSMB is a brief, individually administered assessment of maladaptive behaviors such as aggression, destruction, and attention-seeking in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Maladaptive behaviors are rated as not a problem, problem, or major problem. The measure is used to screen for the type and severity of psychiatric comorbidities [72].
- Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): The CANTAB is a computerized measure of cognitive function across several domains including working memory, learning and executive function, visual, verbal, and episodic memory, attention, information processing, reaction time, social and emotion recognition, and decision making. The current study will only use the Reaction Time, Paired Associates Learning, and Motor Screening subtests. The Reaction Time subtest measures movement time, reaction time, response accuracy, and impulsivity. The Paired Associates Learning subtest assesses visual memory and new learning. The Motor Screening subtest measures sensorimotor deficits or lack of comprehension of the task and will be used to validate data collected from subjects [73,74].
- Expressive Sampling (ELS)—Narration: In this task, a sample of the participant’s spoken language is collected as they produce a narrative for a wordless pisture book they are shown by an examiner. The examiner follows a script and provides minimal scaffolding so that the result reflects what the subject can say independently. Participants are asked to look at the wordless picture book without talking to get a sense of the story as the examiner guides the participant through the exercise. The participant is then shown the wordless picture book a second time and asked to tell the story. Outcome measures derived from this task have been shown to be feasible and have excellent psyhcometric properties and be associated with meaningful adaptive skills for individuals with DS. Examiners are trained to achieve predetermined levels of fidelity with the administration following well-established procedures by the investigative team.
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18): The OSA-18 is a brief, individually administered quality-of-life instrument given to caregivers to assess how obstructive sleep apnea affects the subject’s life in the areas of sleep disturbance, physical symptoms, emotional distress, daytime function, and caregiver concerns [75].
- New Immigrant Survey—Skin Color Scale (NIS-SCS): The scale is an 11-point scale, ranging from zero to 10, with zero representing albinism, or the total absence of color, and 10 representing the darkest possible skin. The ten shades of skin color corresponding to points 1 to 10 on the Massey and Martin Skin Color Scale are depicted in a chart, with each point represented by a hand, of identical form, but differing in color. The respondent never sees the chart. We gather this data for use as a potential covariate in analyses as skin color can affect the absorption of NIR.
- The Perceptions of Blinding Questionnaire (PBQ): The PBQ is a self-report questionnaire to determine the degree to which the participant believes they are receiving the treatment or the sham. Due to the needs of the study population, questions will be asked by the study staff and answered by the participants instead of using the written form.
- Cognitive Scale for Down syndrome (CS-DS): The CS-DS is a written 62-item informant-rated scale that collects information on executive function, memory, and language abilities in adults with DS. Sixty-one items are scored from 0 to 2 and the final question is open-ended. This scale will provide important information regarding the subject’s everyday functioning over the past one to two months.
- PedsQL Young Adult Quality of Life Inventory (Acute Version): This 23-item informant-rated scale assesses physical, emotional, social, and work-related functioning in young adults with Down syndrome. Items are rated on a scale of 0 (“Never”) to 4 (“Almost Always”). The period is the past seven days.
- Clinical Global Impressions—Severity and Improvement (CGI-S, CGI-I): These two instruments are scored 1-7 by the clinician based on the assessment of the subject’s overall clinical status. They measure, based on history and scores on other instruments, (a) severity of cognitive impairment (CGI-S) and (b) clinical improvement (CGI-I).
- Burden Scale for Family Caregivers—Short Version (BSFC-s): This 10-item caregiver-rated scale assesses the subjective burden of participating in the study placed upon family caregivers. Items are rated on a scale of 1 (“Strongly Disagree”) to 3 (“Strongly Agree”); higher scores indicate higher subjective burden.
4.4. EEG Testing
4.5. MRI Scanning
4.6. Data Management
4.7. Statistical Analyses
- Changes in EEG gamma power (40 Hz): EEG will be tested from baseline to after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., within a week after the final t-PBM session); and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline, e.g., 4 weeks after the final tPBM session).
- Changes in intelligibility, vocabulary, and syntax: Language testing will be performed at baseline, after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., within a week after the last t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline), through standardized tasks and semi-computerized signal detection.
- Changes in RTI, PAL, and MOT: The RTI, PAL, and MOT tests will be administered at baseline, after completion of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 6 weeks from baseline, e.g., within a week after the last t-PBM session) and at long-term follow-up (after 10 weeks from baseline), through computerized CANTAB [78].
- Qualitative and quantitative physician—and caregiver—report: Progress, tolerability, and safety will be assessed throughout the study. Of note, the same assessment by a caregiver will be repeated after 4 weeks from the end of all 18 t-PBM sessions (after 10 weeks from baseline).
4.8. Demographic Data on Existing Participants
4.9. Risks and Discomforts
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Trial Registration
References
- De Graaf, G.; Buckley, F.; Skotko, B.G. Estimates of the live births, natural losses, and elective terminations with Down syndrome in the United States. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2015, 167, 756–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antonarakis, S.E.; Skotko, B.G.; Rafii, M.S.; Strydom, A.; Pape, S.E.; Bianchi, D.W.; Sherman, S.L.; Reeves, R.H. Down syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Head, E.; Powell, D.K.; Schmitt, F.A. Metabolic and Vascular Imaging Biomarkers in Down Syndrome Provide Unique Insights Into Brain Aging and Alzheimer Disease Pathogenesis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, R.S.; Hesketh, L.J. Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Ment. Retard Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2000, 6, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roberts, J.E.; Price, J.; Malkin, C. Language and communication development in Down syndrome. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2007, 13, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grieco, J.; Pulsifer, M.; Seligsohn, K.; Skotko, B.; Schwartz, A. Down syndrome: Cognitive and behavioral functioning across the lifespan. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Semin. Med. Genet. 2015, 169, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witecy, B.; Penke, M. Language comprehension in children, adolescents, and adults with Down syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2017, 62, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carney, D.P.; Brown, J.H.; Henry, L.A. Executive function in Williams and Down syndromes. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2013, 34, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kristensen, K.; Lorenz, K.M.; Zhou, X.; Piro-Gambetti, B.; Hartley, S.L.; Godar, S.P.; Diel, S.; Neubauer, E.; Litovsky, R.Y. Language and executive functioning in young adults with Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2022, 66, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, S.J.; Visootsak, J.; Tamburri, P.; Phuong, P.; Baumer, N.; Hernandez, M.; Skotko, B.G.; Ochoa-Lubinoff, C.; D’Ardhuy, X.L.; Kishnani, P.S.; et al. Pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome: Strides to date. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2017, 173, 3029–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palumbo, M.L.; McDougle, C.J. Pharmacotherapy of Down syndrome. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2018, 19, 1875–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Startin, C.M.; Hamburg, S.; Hithersay, R.; Davies, A.; Rodger, E.; Aggarwal, N.; Al-Janabi, T.; Strydom, A. The LonDownS adult cognitive assessment to study cognitive abilities and decline in Down syndrome. Wellcome Open Res. 2016, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCarron, M.; McCallion, P.; Reilly, E.; Mulryan, N. A prospective 14-year longitudinal follow-up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2014, 58, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zis, P.; Strydom, A. Clinical aspects and biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 114, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lott, I.T.; Head, E. Dementia in Down syndrome: Unique insights for Alzheimer disease research. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doran, E.; Keator, D.; Head, E.; Phelan, M.J.; Kim, R.; Totoiu, M.; Barrio, J.R.; Small, G.W.; Potkin, S.G.; Lott, I.T. Down Syndrome, Partial Trisomy 21, and Absence of Alzheimer’s Disease: The Role of APP. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 56, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Mejias, M.; de Lagran, M.M.; Mattia, M.; Castano-Prat, P.; Perez-Mendez, L.; Ciria-Suarez, L.; Gener, T.; Sancristobal, B.; García-Ojalvo, J.; Gruart, A.; et al. Overexpression of Dyrk1A, a Down Syndrome Candidate, Decreases Excitability and Impairs Gamma Oscillations in the Prefrontal Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 3648–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iaccarino, H.F.; Singer, A.C.; Martorell, A.J.; Rudenko, A.; Gao, F.; Gillingham, T.Z.; Mathys, H.; Seo, J.; Kritskiy, O.; Abdurrob, F.; et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature 2016, 540, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stam, C.J.; van Cappellen van Walsum, A.M.; Pijnenburg, Y.A.L.; Berendse, H.W.; de Munck, J.C.; Scheltens, P.; Van Dijk, B.W. Generalized synchronization of MEG recordings in Alzheimer’s Disease: Evidence for involvement of the gamma band. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 19, 562–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palop, J.J.; Chin, J.; Roberson, E.D.; Wang, J.; Thwin, M.T.; Bien-Ly, N.; Yoo, J.; Ho, K.O.; Yu, G.-Q.; Kreitzer, A.; et al. Aberrant excitatory neuronal activity and compensatory remodeling of inhibitory hippocampal circuits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2007, 55, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verret, L.; Mann, E.O.; Hang, G.B.; Barth, A.M.; Cobos, I.; Ho, K.; Devidze, N.; Masliah, E.; Kreitzer, A.C.; Mody, I.; et al. Inhibitory interneuron deficit links altered network activity and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer model. Cell 2012, 149, 708–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillespie, A.K.; Jones, E.A.; Lin, Y.-H.; Karlsson, M.P.; Kay, K.; Yoon, S.Y.; Tong, L.M.; Nova, P.; Carr, J.S.; Frank, L.M.; et al. Apolipoprotein E4 Causes Age-Dependent Disruption of Slow Gamma Oscillations during Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples. Neuron 2016, 90, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clausen, J.; Sersen, E.A.; Lidsky, A. Sleep patterns in mental retardation: Down’s syndrome. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1977, 43, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babiloni, C.; Albertini, G.; Onorati, P.; Vecchio, F.; Buffo, P.; Sarà, M.; Condoluci, C.; Pistoia, F.; Carducci, F.; Rossini, P.M. Inter-hemispheric functional coupling of eyes-closed resting EEG rhythms in adolescents with Down syndrome. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velikova, S.; Magnani, G.; Arcari, C.; Falautano, M.; Franceschi, M.; Comi, G.; Leocani, L. Cognitive impairment and EEG background activity in adults with Down’s syndrome: A topographic study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murata, T.; Koshino, Y.; Omori, M.; Murata, I.; Nishio, M.; Horie, T.; Isaki, K. Quantitative EEG study on premature aging in adult Down’s syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry 1994, 35, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whittington, M.A.; Cunningham, M.O.; LeBeau, F.E.; Racca, C.; Traub, R.D. Multiple origins of the cortical gamma rhythm. Dev. Neurobiol. 2011, 71, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buzsáki, G.; Wang, X.-J. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35, 203–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegel, M.; Donner, T.H.; Engel, A.K. Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’acunzo, P.; Pérez-González, R.; Kim, Y.; Hargash, T.; Miller, C.; Alldred, M.J.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Penikalapati, S.C.; Pawlik, M.; Saito, M.; et al. Mitovesicles are a novel population of extracellular vesicles of mitochondrial origin altered in Down syndrome. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabe5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, K.-L.; Lee, H.-C.; Cheah, P.-S.; Ling, K.-H. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Down Syndrome: From Pathology to Therapy. Neuroscience 2023, 511, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gross, T.J.; Doran, E.; Cheema, A.K.; Head, E.; Lott, I.T.; Mapstone, M. Plasma metabolites related to cellular energy metabolism are altered in adults with Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Dev. Neurobiol. 2019, 79, 622–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peiris, H.; Dubach, D.; Jessup, C.F.; Unterweger, P.; Raghupathi, R.; Muyderman, H.; Zanin, M.P.; Mackenzie, K.; Pritchard, M.A.; Keating, D.J. RCAN1 regulates mitochondrial function and increases susceptibility to oxidative stress in mammalian cells. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 520316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sobol, M.; Klar, J.; Laan, L.; Shahsavani, M.; Schuster, J.; Annerén, G.; Konzer, A.; Mi, J.; Bergquist, J.; Nordlund, J.; et al. Transcriptome and Proteome Profiling of Neural Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Individuals with Down Syndrome Disclose Dynamic Dysregulations of Key Pathways and Cellular Functions. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 7113–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busciglio, J.; Pelsman, A.; Wong, C.; Pigino, G.; Yuan, M.; Mori, H.; Yankner, B.A. Altered metabolism of the amyloid β precursor protein is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in Down’s syndrome. Neuron 2002, 33, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kann, O.; Huchzermeyer, C.; Kovács, R.; Wirtz, S.; Schuelke, M. Gamma oscillations in the hippocampus require high complex I gene expression and strong functional performance of mitochondria. Brain 2011, 134 Pt 2, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaggi, N.L.; Collins, K.A.; Gonzalez-Castillo, J.; Hurtado, A.M.; Castellanos, F.X.; Osorio, R.; Cassano, P.; Iosifescu, D.V. Transcranial photobiomodulation increases intrinsic brain activity within irradiated areas in early Alzheimer’s disease: Potential link with cerebral metabolism. Brain Stimul. 2024, 17, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehpour, F.; Mahmoudi, J.; Kamari, F.; Sadigh-Eteghad, S.; Rasta, S.H.; Hamblin, M.R. Brain Photobiomodulation Therapy: A Narrative Review. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 6601–6636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naeser, M.A.; Ho, M.D.; Martin, P.I.; Hamblin, M.R.; Koo, B.-B. Increased functional connectivity within intrinsic neural networks in chronic stroke following treatment with red/near-infrared transcranial photobiomodulation: Case series with improved naming in aphasia. Photobiomodul. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2020, 38, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naeser, M.A.; Saltmarche, A.; Krengel, M.H.; Hamblin, M.R.; Knight, J.A. Improved cognitive function after transcranial, light-emitting diode treatments in chronic, traumatic brain injury: Two case reports. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2011, 29, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montazeri, K.; Farhadi, M.; Fekrazad, R.; Akbarnejad, Z.; Chaibakhsh, S.; Mahmoudian, S. Transcranial photobiomodulation in the management of brain disorders. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2021, 221, 112207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vieira, W.F.M.; Gersten, M.B.; Caldieraro, M.A.K.; Cassano, P. Photobiomodulation for major depressive disorder: Linking transcranial infrared light, biophotons and oxidative stress. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 2023, 31, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vieira, W.F.; Iosifescu, D.V.; McEachern, K.M.; Gersten, M.; Cassano, P. Photobiomodulation: An emerging treatment modality for depression. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2023, 46, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naeser, M.A.; Zafonte, R.; Krengel, M.H.; Martin, P.I.; Frazier, J.; Hamblin, M.R.; Knight, J.A.; Meehan, W.P.; Baker, E.H. Significant improvements in cognitive performance post-transcranial, red/near-infrared light-emitting diode treatments in chronic, mild traumatic brain injury: Open-protocol study. J. Neurotrauma 2014, 31, 1008–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barrett, D.; Gonzalez-Lima, F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans. Neuroscience 2013, 230, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morries, L.D.; Cassano, P.; Henderson, T.A. Treatments for traumatic brain injury with emphasis on transcranial near-infrared laser phototherapy. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 2159–2175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hwang, J.; Castelli, D.M.; Gonzalez-Lima, F. Cognitive enhancement by transcranial laser stimulation and acute aerobic exercise. Lasers Med. Sci. 2016, 31, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, N.J.; Maddox, W.T.; Gonzalez-Lima, F. Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation. J. Neuropsychol. 2017, 11, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, N.J.; Saucedo, C.L.; Gonzalez-Lima, F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation improves rule-based, but not information-integration, category learning in humans. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2017, 139, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagdeo, J.R.; Adams, L.E.; Brody, N.I.; Siegel, D.M. Transcranial red and near infrared light transmission in a cadaveric model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henderson, T.A.; Morries, L.D. Near-infrared photonic energy penetration: Can infrared phototherapy effectively reach the human brain? Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 2191–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tedford, C.E.; DeLapp, S.; Jacques, S.; Anders, J. Quantitative analysis of transcranial and intraparenchymal light penetration in human cadaver brain tissue. Lasers Surg. Med. 2015, 47, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Konstantinović, L.M.; Jelić, M.B.; Jeremić, A.; Stevanović, V.B.; Milanović, S.D.; Filipović, S.R. Transcranial application of near-infrared low-level laser can modulate cortical excitability. Lasers Surg. Med. 2013, 45, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaieb, L.; Antal, A.; Masurat, F.; Paulus, W. Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nawashiro, H.; Wada, K.; Nakai, K.; Sato, S. Focal increase in cerebral blood flow after treatment with near-infrared light to the forehead in a patient in a persistent vegetative state. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2012, 30, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Henderson, T.A.; Morries, L.D. SPECT perfusion imaging demonstrates improvement of traumatic brain injury with transcranial near-infrared laser phototherapy. Adv. Mind Body Med. 2015, 29, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Salgado, A.S.I.; Zângaro, R.A.; Parreira, R.B.; Kerppers, I.I. The effects of transcranial LED therapy (TCLT) on cerebral blood flow in the elderly women. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, F.; Hase, S.N.; Gonzalez-Lima, F.; Liu, H. Transcranial laser stimulation improves human cerebral oxygenation. Lasers Surg. Med. 2016, 48, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lampl, Y.; Zivin, J.A.; Fisher, M.; Lew, R.; Welin, L.; Dahlof, B.; Borenstein, P.; Andersson, B.; Perez, J.; Caparo, C.; et al. Infrared laser therapy for ischemic stroke: A new treatment strategy: Results of the NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-1 (NEST-1). Stroke 2007, 38, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zivin, J.A.; Albers, G.W.; Bornstein, N.; Chippendale, T.; Dahlof, B.; Devlin, T.; Fisher, M.; Hacke, W.; Holt, W.; Ilic, S.; et al. Effectiveness and safety of transcranial laser therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009, 40, 1359–13644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hacke, W.; Schellinger, P.D.; Albers, G.W.; Bornstein, N.M.; Dahlof, B.L.; Fulton, R.; Kasner, S.E.; Shuaib, A.; Richieri, S.P.; Dilly, S.G.; et al. Transcranial laser therapy in acute stroke treatment: Results of NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial 3, a phase III clinical end point device trial. Stroke 2014, 45, 3187–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hennessy, M.; Hamblin, M.R. Photobiomodulation and the brain: A new paradigm. J. Opt. 2017, 19, 013003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marazziti, D.; Baroni, S.; Picchetti, M.; Landi, P.; Silvestri, S.; Vatteroni, E.; Dell’Osso, M.C. Psychiatric disorders and mitochondrial dysfunctions. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 16, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Whittaker, R.G.; Turnbull, D.M.; Whittington, M.A.; Cunningham, M.O. Impaired mitochondrial function abolishes gamma oscillations in the hippocampus through an effect on fast-spiking interneurons. Brain 2011, 134, e180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galow, L.V.; Schneider, J.; Lewen, A.; Ta, T.-T.; Papageorgiou, I.E.; Kann, O. Energy substrates that fuel fast neuronal network oscillations. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glasson, E.J.; Dye, D.E.; Bittles, A.H. The triple challenges associated with age-related comorbidities in Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2014, 58, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spera, V.; Sitnikova, T.; Ward, M.J.; Farzam, P.; Hughes, J.; Gazecki, S.; Bui, E.; Maiello, M.; De Taboada, L.; Hamblin, M.R.; et al. Pilot study on dose-dependent effects of transcranial photobiomodulation on brain electrical oscillations: A potential therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2021, 83, 1481–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mannu, P.; Maiello, M.; Spera, V.; Cassano, P. Transcranial Photobiomodulation for Down Syndrome. Photobiomodul. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2019, 37, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bain, S.K.; Jaspers, K.E. Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition. J. Psychoeduc. Assess 2010, 28, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randolph, C.; Tierney, M.C.; Mohr, E.; Chase, T.N. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1998, 20, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldman, R.; Fristoe, M. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation, Second Edition (GFTA-2) [Database Record]. APA PsycTests. 2000. Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft15098-000 (accessed on 31 May 2024).
- Sturmey, P.; Burcham, K.J.; Perkins, T.S. The Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behaviour: Its reliability and internal consistencies. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 1995, 39, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robbins, T.W.; James, M.; Owen, A.M.; Sahakian, B.J.; McInnes, L.; Rabbitt, P. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): A factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia 1994, 5, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luciana, M.; Nelson, C.A. Assessment of neuropsychological function through use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery: performance in 4- to 12-year-old children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2002, 22, 595–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Constantin, E.; Tewfik, T.L.; Brouillette, R.T. Can the OSA-18 Quality-of-Life Questionnaire detect obstructive sleep apnea in children? Pediatrics 2010, 125, e162–e168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, P.A.; Taylor, R.; Thielke, R.; Payne, J.; Gonzalez, N.; Conde, J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009, 42, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, P.A.; Taylor, R.; Minor, B.L.; Elliott, V.; Fernandez, M.; O’Neal, L.; McLeod, L.; Delacqua, G.; Delacqua, F.; Kirby, J.; et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software partners. J. Biomed. Inform. 2019, 95, 103208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edgin, J.O.; Mason, G.M.; Allman, M.J.; Capone, G.T.; DeLeon, I.; Maslen, C.; Reeves, R.H.; Sherman, S.L.; Nadel, L. Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2010, 2, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapman, R.S. Language and communication in individuals with Down syndrome. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation: Language and Communication in Mental Retardation; Abbeduto, L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; Volume 27, pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Abbeduto, L.; Warren, S.F.; Conners, F.A. Language development in Down syndrome: From the prelinguistic period to the acquisition of literacy. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2007, 13, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Horwitz, B.; Schapiro, M.B.; Grady, C.L.; Rapoport, S.I. Cerebral metabolic pattern in young adult Down’s syndrome subjects: Altered intercorrelations between regional rates of glucose utilization. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1990, 34, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spitzer, B.; Haegens, S. Beyond the status quo: A role for beta oscillations in endogenous content (re)activation. eNeuro 2017, 4, e0170-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas, E.; Barrett, D.W.; Saucedo, C.L.; Huang, L.-D.; Abraham, J.A.; Tanaka, H.; Haley, A.P.; Gonzalez-Lima, F. Beneficial neurocognitive effects of transcranial laser in older adults. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Dmochowski, J.; Zeng, L.; Kallioniemi, E.; Husain, M.; Gonzalez-Lima, F.; Liu, H. Transcranial photobiomodulation with infrared laser increases power of brain oscillations. bioRxiv 2019, 535757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zomorrodi, R.; Loheswaran, G.; Pushparaj, A.; Lim, L. Pulsed near infrared transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation significantly modulates neural oscillations: A pilot exploratory study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keil, A.; Muller, M.M.; Ray, W.J.; Gruber, T.; Elbert, T. Human gamma band activity and perception of a gestalt. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 7152–7161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tallon-Baudry, C.; Bertrand, O. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Senkowski, D.; Herrmann, C.S. Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113, 1742–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busch, N.A.; Debener, S.; Kranczioch, C.; Engel, A.K.; Herrmann, C.S. Size matters: Effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busch, N.A.; Herrmann, C.S.; Muller, M.M.; Lenz, D.; Gruber, T. A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm. Neuroimage 2006, 33, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruber, T.; Tsivilis, D.; Montaldi, D.; Muller, M.M. Induced gamma band responses: An early marker of memory encoding and retrieval. Neuroreport 2004, 15, 1837–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrmann, C.S.; Frund, I.; Lenz, D. Human gamma-band activity: A review on cognitive and behavioral correlates and network models. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guntekin, B.; Basar, E. A review of brain oscillations in perception of faces and emotional pictures. Neuropsychologia 2014, 58, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basar, E.; Demiralp, T.; Schurmann, M.; Basar-Eroglu, C.; Ademoglu, A. Oscillatory brain dynamics, wavelet analysis, and cognition. Brain Lang. 1999, 66, 146–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basar, E.; Basar-Eroglu, C.; Guntekin, B.; Yener, G.G. Brain’s alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta oscillations in neuropsychiatric diseases: Proposal for biomarker strategies. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 62, 19–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Roh, D.; Park, S. Brain multimodality monitoring: Updated perspectives. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2016, 16, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Henderson, T.A.; Morries, L.D. Near-infrared photonic energy penetration—Principles and practice. In Photobiomodulation in the Brain; Hamblin, M., Huang, Y.-Y., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 67–88. [Google Scholar]
- Caldieraro, M.A.; Cassano, P. Transcranial and systemic photobiomodulation for major depressive disorder: A systematic review of efficacy, tolerability and biological mechanisms. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 243, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, X.; Hu, W.; Yu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Korngold, R.; Zhao, Y. Existence of circulating mitochondria in human and animal peripheral blood. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Felice, A.; Castiglia, L.; Formaggio, E.; Cattelan, M.; Scarpa, B.; Manganotti, P.; Tenconi, E.; Masiero, S. Personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and physical therapy to treat motor and cognitive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized cross-over trial. Neuroimage Clin. 2019, 22, 101768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Jang, K.I.; Roh, D.; Kim, H.; Kim, D. A direct comparison of the electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation in healthy subjects. Brain Res. 2020, 1747, 147065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guleyupoglu, B.; Schestatsky, P.; Edwards, D.; Fregni, F.; Bikson, M. Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations. J. Neurosci. Methods 2013, 219, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.K.; Kharkwal, G.B.; Sajo, M.; Huang, Y.Y.; De Taboada, L.; McCarthy, T.; Hamblin, M.R. Dose response effects of 810 nm laser light on mouse primary cortical neurons. Lasers Surg. Med. 2011, 43, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassano, P.; Tran, A.P.; Katnani, H.; Bleier, B.S.; Hamblin, M.R.; Yuan, Y.; Fang, Q. Selective photobiomodulation for emotion regulation: Model-based dosimetry study. Neurophotonics 2019, 6, 015004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, Y.; Cassano, P.; Pias, M.; Fang, Q. Transcranial photobiomodulation with near-infrared light from childhood to elderliness: Simulation of dosimetry. Neurophotonics 2020, 7, 015009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lychagov, V.V.; Tuchin, V.V.; Vilensky, M.A.; Reznik, B.N.; Ichim, T.; De Taboada, L. Experimental study of NIR transmittance of the human skull. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Complex Dynamics and Fluctuations in Biomedical Photonics III, San Jose, CA, USA, 21–24 January 2006; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2006; p. 60850T. [Google Scholar]
Measure (Unit) | Value |
---|---|
Wavelength (nm) | 870, NIR |
Pulse rate (Hz) | 40 |
Duty cycle (%) | 50 |
Exposure time | 30 min, for each site (5 sites), delivered simultaneously NOTE: without pulsing, it requires 22.5 s to deliver 1 J/cm2; with a 50% duty cycle it requires twice as much time: 40 J/cm2 × 22.5-s × 2 = 1800 s or 30 min at each site. |
Window, spot size (cm2) | 22.48 cm2 × each site (diameter 5.345 cm) |
Total area exposed (cm2) | ~112 cm2 (22.48 × 5 sites) |
Peak Irradiance, Peak Power Density (mW/cm2) | 44.48 |
Fluence (J/cm2) per LED cluster head | 40 NOTE: The study clinician will have the option to taper participants up from 20 J/cm2 to 40 J/cm2 over the first few treatments to allow participants time to acclimate to t-PBM. The clinician may continue treatment at 20 J/cm2 or 30 J/cm2 if a participant cannot tolerate 40 J/cm2. |
Energy Density (J/cm2) per LED cluster head | 40 J/cm2 × 22.48 cm2 = 900 J per cluster head |
Total Energy per session (kJ) | ~3.6–4.5 |
Power per LED cluster head (mW) | 1000 |
Device | MedX Health, Console Model 1100 with three LED cluster heads that can be used simultaneously |
Target Brain Area | Diode Placement |
---|---|
Area 1: Mesial prefrontal cortex | At the center, front forehead—at the junction with front hairline |
Area 2: Precuneus cortex | Junction of midsagittal and lambdoid suture lines |
Area 3: Broca Speech area | Left temple |
Area 4: Wernicke area/left temporal cortex | Above left ear (T3) |
Area 5: Left angular gyrus area (BA39) NOTE: This diode will be omitted if the participant’s head is too small to accommodate all five diodes. | Posterior and superior to T3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vieira, W.F.; Coelho, D.R.A.; Gersten, M.; Puerto, A.M.H.; Kalli, S.; Gonzalez-Garibay, G.; McEachern, K.; Clancy, J.A.; Skotko, B.G.; Abbeduto, L.; et al. TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome. Photonics 2024, 11, 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070670
Vieira WF, Coelho DRA, Gersten M, Puerto AMH, Kalli S, Gonzalez-Garibay G, McEachern K, Clancy JA, Skotko BG, Abbeduto L, et al. TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome. Photonics. 2024; 11(7):670. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070670
Chicago/Turabian StyleVieira, Willians Fernando, David Richer Araujo Coelho, Maia Gersten, Aura Maria Hurtado Puerto, Stefani Kalli, Guillermo Gonzalez-Garibay, Kayla McEachern, Julie A. Clancy, Brian G. Skotko, Leonard Abbeduto, and et al. 2024. "TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome" Photonics 11, no. 7: 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070670
APA StyleVieira, W. F., Coelho, D. R. A., Gersten, M., Puerto, A. M. H., Kalli, S., Gonzalez-Garibay, G., McEachern, K., Clancy, J. A., Skotko, B. G., Abbeduto, L., Thurman, A. J., Pulsifer, M. B., Corcoran, E., Saltmarche, A. E., Naeser, M. A., & Cassano, P. (2024). TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome. Photonics, 11(7), 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070670