Next Article in Journal
Multiwavelength Frequency Modulated CW Ladar: The Effect of Refractive Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Absorption Losses and Transient Thermo-Optic Effects in a High-Power Laser System
Previous Article in Journal
A Metamaterial-Inspired Approach to Mitigating Radio Frequency Blackout When a Plasma Forms Around a Reentry Vehicle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tunable THz Pulses Generation in Non-Equilibrium Magnetized Plasma: The Role of Plasma Kinetics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Letter

A Refractive Index Sensitive Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor Based on Multimode Interference

1
State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Research Center for Advanced Photon Technology, Toyota Technological Institute, 2-12-1, Hisakata, Tempaku, Nagoya 468-8511, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2020, 7(4), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040089
Submission received: 2 September 2020 / Revised: 26 September 2020 / Accepted: 5 October 2020 / Published: 6 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology)

Abstract

:
According to the beam propagation method, a fiber refractive index-sensitive multimode interference (MMI) structure fabricated by splicing a self-made silica glass rod between two single mode fibers (SMF–NCF (no core fiber)–SMF structure) is proposed for liquid level monitoring. Theoretical and experimental investigation was carried out meticulously using a 4.5 cm and a 9.5 cm long silica glass rod. It is proved that the simple and economical sensor with the shorter length has high sensitivity, satisfactory repeatability, and favorable stability. The sensitivity climbs with the increase in refractive index of the measured liquid, which is 204 pm/mm for pure water, 265.8 pm/mm for 10% glycerin solution, and 352.5 pm/mm for 25% glycerin solution. The proposed sensor can be standardized in certain application circumstances to achieve accurate liquid level monitoring.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recently, optical fibers have drawn much attention in both scientific research and field applications. Compared with traditional electronic ones, sensors based on optical fibers have numerous superiorities such as small size and weight, low cost and transmission loss, corrosion resistance, and electromagnetic interference immunity, and they have been widely applied in the fields of engineering [1,2,3], chemistry [4,5], environment monitoring [6], and biology and medicine [7,8]. According to the working principles, optical fiber sensors can be divided into interference-based ones [9,10,11,12], grating-based ones [13,14,15], resonance-based ones [16,17,18], or many others. Among them, fiber sensors based on multimode interference structures, as one type of interference-dependent sensors, are particularly popular due to their simple and flexible structure and accurate sensitivity, and they have been used to measure numerous physical parameters including strain [19], temperature [20], curvature [21], liquid level [22], refractive index [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], and magnetic field [31], etc.
For practical application, the fiber-dependent liquid level monitoring sensor plays a significant role in laboratory and engineering conditions, especially in the fuel and petroleum industry, biomedicine, and chemical processing [32,33]. Up to now, a number of techniques associated with liquid level monitoring have been reported. For instance, sensors based on fiber gratings [34], plastic optical fibers [35], interferometers [36], and the local refractive index curved modulation effect [37] have been proposed for this purpose. However, many of them require complicated procedures or structures, or expensive cost to achieve high sensitivity. Therefore, a simple and economical means to realize real-time liquid level monitoring is worth expecting.
In this work, a fiber multimode interference (MMI) structure fabricated by splicing a self-made silica glass rod between two single mode fibers (SMFs) has been proposed to monitor liquid level variation, whose formation is simple and costless. After rigorous theoretical analysis and experimental verification, the sensor is proved to have high sensitivity, satisfactory linearity, and repeatability, which can be standardized in certain circumstances to realize fast and high-accuracy measurement, and can be further applied in the engineering, chemistry, and biology fields.

2. Fabrication and Principle

The designed liquid level sensor is fabricated by splicing a length of self-made silica glass rod between two SMFs, as shown in Figure 1a. The cross-section of the silica glass rod is presented in Figure 1b, whose diameter is about 125 μm. During light transmission, the input light initially enters into the lead-in SMF (left) and transmits as the fundamental mode. The silica glass rod can be regarded as a no core fiber, and the light is spliced into multiple high-order modes at the left fusion point. After transmitting through the rod, light in numerous directions converges at the right fusion point to a core fundamental mode and forms an interference spectrum at the end of the lead-out SMF.
Differing from other multimode fibers, the no core fiber itself acts as a fiber core, and the surrounding environment plays the role of cladding. If the sensor is immersed into liquid, the external refractive index of the rod section will be determined by the liquid refractive index and the air refractive index, and the immersing depth would play an extremely important role. When the liquid level changes, the external refractive index of the sensing part alters correspondingly, which means the cladding refractive index and mode coupling changes, resulting in a shift of the interference spectrum. Based on it, a liquid level monitoring sensor is put forward, as shown in Figure 1c.
The intensity of the interference spectrum (I) can be expressed as the following formula [38]:
I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 I 1 I 2 c o s ϕ            
ϕ = 2 π ( n e f f 1 n e f f 2 ) L λ    
where I 1 and I 2 are the intensity of any two-order mode involved in the interference,   ϕ is the phase difference between the two modes, and   n e f f 1 and n e f f 2 are their effective refractive indices, respectively. L is the length of the silica glass rod and λ is the free space wavelength of the input light. From this formula, we can see clearly that I is under the direct influence of L, which impacts the mode distribution and interference. Therefore, by observing the variation of the spectrum intensity, liquid level change can be monitored.

3. Numerical Analysis

The transmission properties of the MMI are simulated based on the beam propagation method (BPM). The core refractive index of the SMFs is 1.45, the cladding refractive index 1.445, and the length 1 cm. The length of the silica glass rod is selected to be 4.5 or 9.5 cm, and its refractive index is assumed to be 1.45. The liquid refractive index (nliquid) is set to be 1.33, and the immersing depth grows from 1 to 1.4 cm with a step size of 2 mm. During the numerical simulation, the material dispersion induced by silica Sellmeier coefficients was not taken into consideration due to its limited influence.
Figure 2 demonstrates the simulated transmission property of MMI using a 9.5 cm long silica glass rod. In Figure 2a, it is clear that light is, at first, confined to the core of the lead-in SMF. After entering into the silica glass rod, various modes are excited and couple with each other to fluctuate regularly between the maximum and minimum. In other words, with the different length of the no core fiber, the distribution of the optical field will periodically reproduce, which is the self-imaging effect [39,40]. Finally, the light returns to the lead-out SMF, and due to the different mode coupling condition, the light intensity varies slightly at different wavelengths, which produces an interference spectrum. Figure 2b presents the output light intensity at different free space wavelengths and the evolution of the interference spectrum when the immersing depth rises by 4 mm. We can see that with the increase in liquid level, the interference spectrum tends to red shift and the sensitivity mounts to 300 pm/mm.
Figure 3 describes the transmission and sensing properties of MMI structure when a 4.5 cm long silica glass rod is adopted. Compared with Figure 2, it can be seen that a shorter MMI structure brings about less interference peaks but the sensitivity is enhanced to 400 pm/mm. This is because the increased length enlarges the loss, resulting in a rising number of loss peaks in the transmission spectrum, which is adverse to the sensing sensitivity.
In addition, to simulate different liquid detection environments, we adjust the liquid refractive index to 1.36 and 1.39 and analyze, respectively, the sensitivities, as shown in Figure 4. There is no doubt that the sensitivity climbs with the increase in the liquid refractive index, and 400 pm/mm for nliquid = 1.333, 500 pm/mm for nliquid = 1.36, and 800 pm/mm for nliquid = 1.39. This is because the larger the liquid refractive index, the more significant the contrast with the air, and in turn, the more sensitive the mode coupling is to the liquid/air interface, which finally leads to a higher sensitivity to liquid level monitoring.

4. Experimental Results and Discussion

The experimental setup is shown in Figure 5. Light was emitted by an ASE (amplified spontaneous emission) light source passed through the designed MMI-based sensor, which was immersed in the measured liquid. The output light was collected by an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA: Yokogawa AQ6375B) to monitor the interference spectrum. For fabrication of the MMI-based sensor, we firstly used a wire stripper to remove the coating layer of the single mode fiber, and used a cutting knife (CT-50, Fujikura) to make the fiber tip flat. After selecting an appropriate length of silica rod according to the liquid level, an optical fiber fusion machine (S179c, Furukawa) was used for the connection of the fiber rod and single mode fibers. During the fusion process, a built-in program (single mode-multimode, SM-MM) was used, and each fiber was cleaned with alcohol before fusion.
Figure 6 presents the respective sensing properties when using different NCF lengths (4.5 and 9.5 cm) during the measurement of pure water (nliquid = 1.333). We can see that the longer NCF is superior to the shorter one in terms of visibility of the fringe pattern and the number of the interference peaks, and as the liquid level went up, the interference spectrum moved towards the longer wavelength. According to Equations (1) and (2), the intensity of interference spectrum depends on the intensity of the existing modes and their phase difference. With the increasing liquid level, the effective refractive index difference decreases, bringing about a decrease in phase difference ( ϕ ) and a spectral shift to the right.
The spatial frequency information of the interference spectrum of the MMI structures with different silica glass rod lengths was obtained using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), as shown in Figure 7a. In comparison, the longer MMI structure has more peaks in frequency domain space, which means it has more cladding modes to interfere and an increasing number of interference peaks and dips. The respective sensitivity of the MMI-based sensor using different silica glass rod lengths is shown in Figure 7b. We can see clearly that the sensor using the shorter MMI length (4.5 cm) has a sensitivity twice higher than that of the other one (9.5 cm), which is 204 pm/mm for the former and 106 pm/mm for the latter. Thus, the increasing number of interference peaks and the larger modulation depth of the longer MMI length were not conductive to improving sensitivity. This conclusion is consistent with the theoretical simulation result. The 4.5 cm long MMI was selected for the following discussion.
Figure 8a gives information about the sensitivities of two varying interference dips, namely, Dip A and Dip B in Figure 6b. It can be seen that the sensitivity of Dip A is 204 pm/mm, and that of Dip B is 158 pm/mm. This sensitivity disparity of the dips in the experiment resulted from the existence of a surface evanescent field induced by various higher order modes. The external environment refractive index would affect the higher order modes to numerous extents, and the loss of these modes is different. When modes interfere with each other, dips will be formed and affected by the diverse interference conditions. Therefore, when the external environment changes, different dips would have different sensitivities. The ideal simulation fails to take these complexities into consideration. Because the sensing sensitivity decreases with the blue shift of the dip position, thus Dip A is chosen for sensitivity calibration of the liquid level monitoring sensor. Repeatability of this sensor is verified, as shown in Figure 8b. It is clear that during the rising up and falling down of the liquid level, the sensitivity only exhibits a slight fluctuation, which is 204 and 196 pm/mm (Dip A@ 4.5 cm length), respectively. Consequently, the designed sensor is experimentally proved to have satisfactory repeatability.
Figure 9 illustrates the stability of the sensor, and a 10 cm high liquid level test was repeated five times. The mean wavelength of the interference spectrum Dip A is 1589.34 nm, and the standard deviation is 0.055, which shows a fine stability. Furthermore, for the response time of the sensor, spectrum changes were observed by OSA after adjusting the liquid level. After a few scanning cycles, the response time is measured to be about five to six seconds when the liquid level increases. This value rises a little bit as the liquid level drops, since when the liquid level decreases, there is some residual liquid on the surface of the sensor and it takes more time for the liquid to fall back.
Apart from the liquid level detection of pure water, the designed sensor was also used to measure a glycerin solution with a volume fraction of 10% and 25% to test its sensing property. Figure 10 illustrates the respective sensitivities, which is 204 pm/mm for pure water, 265.8 pm/mm for the 10% glycerin solution, and 352.5 pm/mm for the 25% glycerin solution. The refractive index of the glycerin solution is larger than that of pure water, and its value climbs with the increase in glycerin volume fraction [41], as does the sensitivity of the MMI-based sensor. As a matter of fact, as long as the test liquid has a refractive index lower than that of the fiber, the proposed sensor can exhibit a good performance in detecting its liquid level change. If the refractive index of the liquid surpasses that of the fiber MMI structure, light would leak to the liquid based on optical transmission theory, leading to a detection failure.
As is evidenced by all the figures released above, the goodness of fit (R2) concerning each linear fit line is larger than 0.97, which means the sensor has satisfactory linearity and accuracy. In this experiment, we used a shorter MMI structure to achieve higher sensitivity, but this did not mean the shorter the better. A shorter length would naturally limit the sensing range, which would mutually restrict the sensitivity and the measuring range. Therefore, in field applications, the MMI length needs to be adjusted according to the actual environment. Meanwhile, surface cleaning of the sensor should be taken into consideration to avoid measuring errors. Table 1 presents a comparison of the designed sensor and other liquid level sensors reported previously, which highlights the advantages such as high sensitivity and wide measuring range aside from its easy fabrication.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a refractive index-sensitive liquid level monitoring sensor was proposed based on a fiber MMI, and theoretical and experimental investigation was carried out in detail in this work. The influence of the NCF length and liquid refractive index on the sensing sensitivity was analyzed with discretion. By comparing the performance of sensors made by different silica glass rod lengths (4.5 and 9.5 cm), it is proved that the sensor with the shorter length had high sensitivity, satisfactory repeatability, and favorable stability. The sensitivity of the proposed sensor climbed with the increase in refractive index of the measured liquid, which was 204pm/mm for pure water, 265.8 pm/mm for 10% glycerin solution, and 352.5 pm/mm for 25% glycerin solution. The theoretical analysis was consistent with the experimental results. The proposed sensor can be standardized in certain application circumstances to achieve fast and accurate liquid level monitoring, which can be applied in the engineering, chemistry, and biology fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z. and T.C.; methodology, F.Z.; software, F.Z.; validation, F.Z., S.L. and T.C.; formal analysis, S.L.; investigation, X.Z.; resources, T.C., X.Y., X.Z., and S.L.; data curation, T.S. and F.W.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.Z. and T.C.; visualization, Y.O.; supervision, T.C.; project administration, T.C.; funding acquisition, T.C., X.Y., X.Z., and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFB2204001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (61775032 and 11604042), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N180406002, N180408018, and N2004021), JSPS KAKENHI Grant(17K18891 and 18H01504), JSPS and CERN under the JSPS-CERN joint research program, and 111 Project (B16009).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Liao Ning Revitalization Talents Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.N.; Li, D.S.; Song, G.B. Recent applications of fiber optic sensors to health monitoring in civil engineering. Eng. Struct. 2004, 26, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Habel, W.R.; Krebber, K. Fiber-optic sensor applications in civil and geotechnical engineering. Photonic Sens. 2011, 1, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Leung, C.K.Y.; Wan, K.T.; Inaudi, D.; Bao, X.Y.; Habel, W.; Zhou, Z.; Ou, J.P.; Ghandehari, M.; Wu, H.C.; Imai, M. Optical fiber sensors for civil engineering applications. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 871–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zamarreno, C.R.; Hernaez, M.; Del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Optical fiber pH sensor based on lossy-mode resonances by means of thin polymeric coatings. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2011, 155, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X.D.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors (2015–2019). Anal. Chem. 2019, 92, 397–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Joe, H.E.; Yun, H.; Jo, S.H.; Jun, M.B.G.; Min, B.K. A review on optical fiber sensors for environmental monitoring. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2018, 5, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vaiano, P.; Carotenuto, B.; Pisco, M.; Ricciardi, A.; Quero, G.; Consales, M.; Crescitelli, A.; Esposito, E.; Cusano, A. Lab on fiber technology for biological sensing applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2016, 10, 922–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gandhi, M.S.A.; Chu, S.; Senthilnathan, K.; Babu, P.R.; Nakkeeran, K.; Li, Q. Recent advances in plasmonic sensor-based fiber optic probes for biological applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liao, H.; Lu, P.; Fu, X.; Jiang, X.Y.; Ni, W.J.; Liu, D.M.; Zhang, J.S. Sensitivity amplification of fiber-optic in-line Mach–Zehnder Interferometer sensors with modified Vernier-effect. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 26898–26909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Chen, M.Q.; Xia, F.; Lv, R.Q. Small in-fiber Fabry-Perot low-frequency acoustic pressure sensor with PDMS diaphragm embedded in hollow-core fiber. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2018, 270, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chu, R.; Guan, C.Y.; Bo, Y.T.; Shi, J.H.; Zhu, Z.; Li, P.; Yang, J.; Yuan, L.B. All-optical graphene-oxide humidity sensor based on a side-polished symmetrical twin-core fiber Michelson interferometer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 284, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, T.; Zhang, H.; Xue, L.F.; Liu, B.; Liu, H.F.; Huang, B.C.; Sun, J.J.; Wang, D.B. Highly sensitive torsion sensor based on side-hole-fiber Sagnac interferometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 7378–7382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chethana, K.; Guru Prasad, A.S.; Omkar, S.N.; Asokan, S. Fiber bragg grating sensor based device for simultaneous measurement of respiratory and cardiac activities. J. Biophotonics 2017, 10, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Y.Z.; Tang, F.J.; Bao, Y.; Tang, Y.; Chen, G.D. A Fe-C coated long-period fiber grating sensor for corrosion-induced mass loss measurement. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 2306–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guo, T.; Liu, F.; Guan, B.O.; Albert, J. Tilted fiber grating mechanical and biochemical sensors. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 78, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhou, X.; Li, X.G.; Cheng, T.L.; Li, S.G.; An, G.W. Graphene enhanced optical fiber SPR sensor for liquid concentration measurement. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 43, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.D.; Li, S.G.; Yan, X.; Sun, D.M.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, T.L. High sensitivity photonic crystal fiber refractive index sensor with gold coated externally based on surface plasmon resonance. Micromachines 2018, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhou, X.; Li, X.G.; Li, S.G.; An, G.W.; Cheng, T.L. Magnetic field sensing based on SPR optical fiber sensor interacting with magnetic fluid. IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 68, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, J.; Lan, X.W.; Wang, H.Z.; Yuan, L.; Wei, T.; Gao, Z.; Xiao, H. Polymer optical fiber for large strain measurement based on multimode interference. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 4308–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, P.F.; Ding, M.; Bo, L.; Guan, C.Y.; Semenova, Y.; Wu, Q.; Farrell, G.; Brambilla, G. Ultrahigh-sensitivity temperature fiber sensor based on multimode interference. Appl. Optics 2012, 51, 3236–3242. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gong, Y.; Zhao, T.; Rao, Y.J.; Wu, Y. All-fiber curvature sensor based on multimode interference. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2011, 23, 679–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Antonio-Lopez, J.E.; Sanchez-Mondragon, J.J.; LiKamWa, P.; May-Arrioja, D.A. Fiber-optic sensor for liquid level measurement. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 3425–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, X.L.; Chen, K.; Mao, X.F.; Peng, W.; Yu, Q.X. A reflective fiber-optic refractive index sensor based on multimode interference in a coreless silica fiber. Opt. Commun. 2015, 340, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Janczuk-Richter, M.; Dominik, M.; Razniecka, E.; Koba, M.; Mikulic, P.; Bock, W.J.; Los, M.; Smietana, M.; Niedziolka-Jonsson, J. Long-period fiber grating sensor for detection of viruses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 250, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Osorio, J.H.; Oliveira, R.; Aristilde, S.; Chesini, G.; Franco, M.A.R.; Nogueira, R.N.; Cordeiro, C.M.B. Bragg gratings in surface-core fibers: Refractive index and directional curvature sensing. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 34, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jing, N.; Teng, C.X.; Zheng, J.; Wang, G.J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, Z.B. A liquid level sensor based on a race-track helical plastic optical fiber. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2017, 29, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Hou, Y.L.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.J.; Gao, X.L.; Zhang, H.X.; Liu, W.Y. An optical fiber liquid level sensor based on side coupling induction technology. J. Sens. 2018, 2018, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Aristilde, S.; Cordeiro, C.M.B.; Jonas, H.O. Gasoline quality sensor based on tilted fiber Bragg gratings. Photonics 2019, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Teng, C.X.; Liu, H.Q.; Deng, H.C.; Deng, S.J.; Yang, H.Y.; Xu, R.H.; Chen, M.; Yuan, L.B.; Zheng, J. Liquid level sensor based on a V-groove structure plastic optical fiber. Sensors 2018, 18, 3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gomez-Cardona, N.; Reyes-Vera, E.; Torres, P. High sensitivity refractive index sensor based on the excitation of long-range surface plasmon polaritons in H-shaped optical fiber. Sensors 2020, 20, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lin, W.; Miao, Y.P.; Zhang, H.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y.G.; Song, B.B. Fiber-optic in-line magnetic field sensor based on the magnetic fluid and multimode interference effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 151101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, C.R.; Ye, L.; Ge, J.F.; Zou, J.H.; Yu, X. Novel light-leaking optical fiber liquid-level sensor for aircraft fuel gauging. Opt. Eng. 2013, 52, 014402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, S.H.; Tian, J.; Liu, N.L.; Xia, J.J.; Lu, P.X. Temperature insensitive liquid level sensor based on antiresonant reflecting guidance in silica tube. J. Lightwave Technol. 2016, 34, 5239–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yun, B.F.; Chan, N.; Cui, Y.P. Highly sensitive liquid-level sensor based on etched fiber Bragg grating. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2007, 19, 1747–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, X.; Ren, L.Y.; Xu, Y.P.; Chen, N.N.; Ju, H.J.; Liang, J.; He, Z.Q.; Qu, E.S.; Hu, B.W.; Li, Y.L. Low-cost multipoint liquid-level sensor with plastic optical fiber. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gong, H.P.; Song, H.F.; Zhang, S.L.; Ni, K.; Dong, X.Y. An optical liquid level sensor based on polarization-maintaining fiber modal interferometer. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2014, 205, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhang, W.G.; Chen, L.; Yu, L.; Kong, L.X.; Yan, T.Y. Ultra-high sensitivity liquid level sensor based on CO2 laser local refractive index curved modulation effect. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 120, 105755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, L.; Xia, L.; Xie, Z.H.; Liu, D.M. All-fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometers for sensing applications. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 11109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamauchi, J.; Shibayama, J.; Sekiguchi, M.; Nakano, H. Improved multistep method for wide-angle beam propagation. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1996, 8, 1361–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zheng, J.J.; Li, J.; Ning, T.G.; Li, L.; Jian, S.S.; Wen, Y.H. Improved self-imaging for multimode optical fiber involving cladding refractive index. Opt. Commun. 2013, 311, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Basker, D. Relationship between refractive index and specific gravity of aqueous glycerol solutions. Analyst 1978, 103, 185–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fu, H.Y.; Shu, X.W.; Zhang, A.P.; Liu, W.S.; Zhang, L.; He, S.L. Implementation and characterization of liquid-level sensor based on a long-period fiber grating Mach–Zehnder interferometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 2878–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xue, H.; Xu, Z.W.; Chen, H.; Yang, Y.Y.; You, J.Z.; Yan, J.R.; Fu, H.Y.; Zhang, D. Continuous liquid level sensor based on a reflective long period fiber grating interferometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2015, 26, 037001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, B.; Li, J.Q.; Li, Y.; Dong, X.Y. A thin-core fiber modal interferometer for liquid-level sensing. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2012, 29, 104209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jing, N. Liquid level measurement based on multi-S-bend plastic optical fiber. Sens. Rev. 2019, 39, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, H.Y.; Chang, Y.C.; Sheng, H.J.; Fu, M.Y.; Liu, W.F.; Kashyap, R. An ultra-sensitive liquid-level indicator based on an etched chirped-fiber Bragg grating. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, T.T.; Liu, Z.G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, W. All-fiber liquid-level sensor based on in-line MSM Fiber Structure. Photonic Sens. 2020, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Designed multimode interference (MMI) structure, (b) Cross-section of the self-made silica glass rod, (c) Liquid level monitoring sensor based on MMI structure. SMF—single mode fiber.
Figure 1. (a) Designed multimode interference (MMI) structure, (b) Cross-section of the self-made silica glass rod, (c) Liquid level monitoring sensor based on MMI structure. SMF—single mode fiber.
Photonics 07 00089 g001
Figure 2. Simulation of MMI using a 9.5 cm long silica glass rod, (a) Electric field distribution of MMI in Z axis, (b) Analysis of the liquid level monitoring sensitivity (nliquid = 1.333).
Figure 2. Simulation of MMI using a 9.5 cm long silica glass rod, (a) Electric field distribution of MMI in Z axis, (b) Analysis of the liquid level monitoring sensitivity (nliquid = 1.333).
Photonics 07 00089 g002
Figure 3. Simulation of MMI using a 4.5 cm long silica glass rod, (a) Electric field distribution of MMI in Z axis, (b) Analysis of the liquid level monitoring sensitivity (nliquid = 1.333).
Figure 3. Simulation of MMI using a 4.5 cm long silica glass rod, (a) Electric field distribution of MMI in Z axis, (b) Analysis of the liquid level monitoring sensitivity (nliquid = 1.333).
Photonics 07 00089 g003
Figure 4. Sensitivities in different liquid conditions (a) nliquid = 1.36, (b) nliquid = 1.39.
Figure 4. Sensitivities in different liquid conditions (a) nliquid = 1.36, (b) nliquid = 1.39.
Photonics 07 00089 g004
Figure 5. Experimental setup of the liquid level monitoring sensor. ASE- amplified spontaneous emission; OSA-optical spectrum analyzer.
Figure 5. Experimental setup of the liquid level monitoring sensor. ASE- amplified spontaneous emission; OSA-optical spectrum analyzer.
Photonics 07 00089 g005
Figure 6. Experimental results of the proposed sensor using different silica glass rod lengths (a) Length = 9.5 cm, (b) Length = 4.5 cm.
Figure 6. Experimental results of the proposed sensor using different silica glass rod lengths (a) Length = 9.5 cm, (b) Length = 4.5 cm.
Photonics 07 00089 g006
Figure 7. (a) Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the experimental interference spectrum, (b) Sensitivities of the MMI structures using different silica glass rod lengths.
Figure 7. (a) Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the experimental interference spectrum, (b) Sensitivities of the MMI structures using different silica glass rod lengths.
Photonics 07 00089 g007
Figure 8. (a) Sensitivities of Dip A and Dip B in 4.5cm length, (b) Repeatability of the liquid level sensor (Data from Dip A@ 4.5cm length).
Figure 8. (a) Sensitivities of Dip A and Dip B in 4.5cm length, (b) Repeatability of the liquid level sensor (Data from Dip A@ 4.5cm length).
Photonics 07 00089 g008
Figure 9. Stability of the liquid level sensor (Data from Dip A@ 4.5cm length).
Figure 9. Stability of the liquid level sensor (Data from Dip A@ 4.5cm length).
Photonics 07 00089 g009
Figure 10. Sensitivities in various measured liquid conditions.
Figure 10. Sensitivities in various measured liquid conditions.
Photonics 07 00089 g010
Table 1. Comparison with other fiber liquid level sensors.
Table 1. Comparison with other fiber liquid level sensors.
MethodSensitivityMeasurement Range Reference
Long period fiber grating (LPFG)250 pm/mm0–100 mm[42]
Michelson interferometer8.44 pm/mm0–100 mm[43]
Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) based on thin core fiber288 pm/mm0–65 mm[44]
S-bend plastic optical fiber0.04 dB/mm0–100 mm[45]
Etched chirped fiber Bragg grating (FBG)1214 pm/mm0–7 mm[46]
Multimode-Single mode-Multimode (MSM)264.6 pm/mm0–26 mm[47]
Curved modulation of refractive index (RI)712 pm/mm0–24mm[30]
MMI based on NCF352.5 pm/mm0–45 mmThis work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, F.; Li, S.; Yan, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, F.; Suzuki, T.; Ohishi, Y.; Cheng, T. A Refractive Index Sensitive Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor Based on Multimode Interference. Photonics 2020, 7, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040089

AMA Style

Zhang F, Li S, Yan X, Zhang X, Wang F, Suzuki T, Ohishi Y, Cheng T. A Refractive Index Sensitive Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor Based on Multimode Interference. Photonics. 2020; 7(4):89. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Fan, Shuguang Li, Xin Yan, Xuenan Zhang, Fang Wang, Takenobu Suzuki, Yasutake Ohishi, and Tonglei Cheng. 2020. "A Refractive Index Sensitive Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor Based on Multimode Interference" Photonics 7, no. 4: 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040089

APA Style

Zhang, F., Li, S., Yan, X., Zhang, X., Wang, F., Suzuki, T., Ohishi, Y., & Cheng, T. (2020). A Refractive Index Sensitive Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor Based on Multimode Interference. Photonics, 7(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop