3. Results and Discussion
A series of experiments was carried out to study the temperature dynamics in a fixed radiation–heat converter. The radiation–heat converter was supplied with diode laser radiation with powers in the range of 3–6 W. The SAC-coated fiber was heated to a temperature of approximately 2000 K during the absorption of radiation. The time dependence of the SAC temperature is shown in
Figure 2.
As follows from the temporal characteristics, at first, in less than 1 s, a sharp increase in temperature to a certain maximum value was observed. Then, in 2–3 s, the temperature decreased to ~2000 K, and, finally, an almost stationary plateau is formed. Contrary to the expectations, an increase in the power of a diode laser did not lead to an increase in the temperature reached in this case. To explain this effect, the following theoretical model was constructed.
Let us consider the problem of heat propagation in an optical fiber with a layer of SAC deposited on the fiber tip. The laser radiation passing through the absorbing layer heats it up, which leads to heating of the optical fiber. In our model, we took into account that the SAC material will evaporate at sufficient heating. A decrease in the SAC thickness leads to a decrease in heating due to the decrease in radiation absorption. Let us calculate how the temperature in the system will change as a result of these processes for different radiation powers.
To solve this problem, we used the following model. In a cylindrical coordinate system (
z,
r,
φ), we considered a semi-infinite cylindrical fiber of radius
R, located along the positive direction of the
z-axis (see
Figure 3). The point
r = 0 coincides with the center of the fiber. The fiber tip is located at the point
z = 0. The fiber material is assumed to be homogeneous. We assumed that the problem is homogeneous in the azimuthal angle
φ. At the point
z = 0 of the fiber tip, there is an SAC, the thickness of which is so small that the effect of conversion of laser radiation energy into heat can be taken into consideration upon absorption of light through the boundary condition, as the heat flux into the fiber. This is often done when considering laser heating of metals [
14]. We assumed that the substance of the absorbing layer is homogeneous and the layer thickness is the same over the entire area of the fiber tip.
The absorption coefficient of the SAC at the fiber tip at the laser diode radiation wavelength
λ = 965 nm was measured to be
αSAC = 1200 cm
−1. The absorption coefficient of the fiber material was approximately 10
−2 cm
−1 [
15], which is significantly less than the absorption of the SAC material. Therefore, we neglected the absorption of laser radiation directly in the fiber, considering it to be optically transparent.
The temperature distribution
T(
t,
z,
r) in a cylindrical coordinate system in the case when the problem is uniform in angle is described by the following diffusion equation:
where
cp,
ρ, and
κ are, respectively, the specific heat at constant pressure, density, and thermal conductivity of silica glass.
We assumed that the condition of an ideal thermal contact between the substance of the absorbing layer and the fiber, i.e., the temperature of the absorbing layer, coincides with the temperature at the fiber tip T(z=0).
The heat exchange with the environment through the side surface of the fiber is described by the equation:
where
G is the coefficient of heat transfer between the fiber side surface and the air, and
Troom is the room temperature.
Let us introduce the temperature averaged in the transverse direction to the fiber axis:
After averaging over the temperature in the transverse direction in Equation (1) and using Condition (2), we obtain:
Assuming that the temperature changes across the fiber are insignificant and
, which implies the relative smallness of the coefficient
G, we obtain a one-dimensional equation for the temperature averaged over the transverse coordinate:
At the tip of the fiber, the boundary condition takes into account the heating of the SAC with optical thickness
D, when the radiation with intensity
I passes through it. Let us also take into account the heat loss due to thermal radiation, assuming that when heated, the absorbing layer radiates as an absolutely black body from both surfaces. Taking into consideration the cooling of the substance during ablation (see, for example, [
14] and references therein), as well as the heat exchange with air, we obtain the following boundary condition for the one-dimensional Equation (3):
where
σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant,
ρSAC and
μSAC are the density and molar mass of the SAC, respectively,
NA is the Avogadro number,
kB is the Boltzmann constant,
Ta is some characteristic ablation temperature, and
ν is the ablation rate.
The optical thickness of the SAC is determined by its absorption coefficient and thickness
l:
As the absorbing layer evaporates, its thickness decreases. We assumed that the substance evaporates uniformly and the strongly absorbing layer remains flat with a constant thickness over the entire tip area. The rate of change in thickness is written in the form [
14]:
where
A0 is a characteristic constant.
As the boundary condition at the other, infinitely distant end of the fiber, we assumed that the temperature is equal to the room temperature Troom. We also took the room temperature of the fiber as the initial condition.
The problem was solved numerically by the sweep (the elimination) method [
16] with the transition to a new spatial variable
y = 1 − exp(−
γ z).
According to [
17], the thermal diffusivity of silica glass
remains approximately constant up to the ablation temperatures of the substance. Assuming that the thermal conductivity coefficient weakly depends on the changes in temperature allowed us to describe the temperature distribution in the form Equation (3). Then, in the calculations, we assumed that
kT is equal to 7.8 cm
2/s and does not depend on temperature. The temperature dependence of
κ is described in the paper [
18].
We assumed that the intensity of laser radiation is uniformly distributed over the fiber tip; then, , where P is the laser diode power.
According to [
19], the heat transfer coefficient for a fiber–air pair is
G = 5.6 W/(m
2⋅K). The room temperature
Troom = 300 K. The optical fiber radius is
R = 250 µm. The molar density of the substance of the strongly absorbing layer is set to be equal to
= 0.2 mol/cm
3.
Within the framework of this model, the dependence of SAC temperature on irradiation time was calculated for different laser radiation powers. The curves obtained were compared with the available experimental data (see
Figure 2). The comparison took into account that in the course of the experiment, the SAC was deposited anew each time. The initial layer thickness could vary from experiment to experiment. Therefore, the value of the initial optical thickness of the absorbing layer
D0 was adjusted so as to ensure the best agreement with the experimental data. In particular, for two experiments with
P = 4 W, the value of
D0 was the same, due to which the theoretical curves calculated according to the model for the power of 4 W coincided.
The time dependence of the optical thickness of the SAC, calculated according to the above model, is shown in
Figure 4.
The comparison of the time dependence of temperature calculated within the framework of the proposed model with the experimental data made it possible to determine the characteristic values of the parameters of the problem: A0 = 2 × 106 cm/s, Ta = 5 × 104 K. The Ta value corresponds to bond energy 4.3 eV, which is an intermediate value between the bond energies of C-C and SiO2.
As can be seen from the data in
Figure 2, the radiation power used to heat the fiber tip, as well as the initial thickness of the absorbing layer, have little effect on the temperature of the fiber tip. With an increase in the SAC heating due to an increase in the power of absorbed radiation or an increase in SAC thickness, the substance of the layer begins to evaporate faster. A decrease in the thickness of the absorbing layer, in turn, leads to a reduced heating efficiency and to a decrease in the temperature of the absorbing layer. As a result of this self-regulation process, the temperature of the fiber tip in a few seconds (~5 s) after turning on the laser reaches a value of approximately 2000 K, regardless of the power of the laser radiation or the initial thickness of the absorbing layer.
Let us see how important the role of the ablation process of the SAC in the process of temperature stabilization is. For this, we calculated the change in the temperature of the absorbing layer and its optical thickness in the cases when (1) losses due to radiation and heat exchange with the environment are neglected, while ablation losses are taken into account, and (2) only losses due to radiation and heat exchange with air are taken into consideration in the system, the layer does not evaporate. The calculation results are shown in
Figure 5. One can see from the figure that the evaporation of the substance of the absorbing layer plays a fundamental role in the process of temperature stabilization. Radiation and heat transfer do not significantly affect the change in SAC temperature, while in the absence of ablation, the temperature graphs have a fundamentally different character.
The results obtained can be qualitatively explained as follows. As the evaporation rate is highly temperature-dependent, the final temperature sets in so that the corresponding evaporation rate is low. The heat release caused by the laser radiation absorption is proportional to
I (1-exp(-
D)).
Figure 6 shows the time dependence of the product
I (1-exp(-
D)) for various laser radiation powers when all types of losses (thick curves) are taken into account in the system and when only ablation is taken into consideration (thin curves). As can be seen from the data in the figure, after the temperature has set in, i.e., in ~4–5 s, the value of
I (1-exp(-
D)) almost does not depend on the laser radiation power
P. At small
D,
(see Equation (4)). Thus, an increase in the laser radiation intensity simply results in a thinner remaining layer (see
Figure 2 and
Figure 7). In this case, the final thickness does not depend on the initial thickness of the absorbing layer. With a full account of heat losses in the system, the residual thickness of the SAC increases compared to the case when only ablation is taken into consideration.
In conclusion, we present the results of visual monitoring a fiber tip with a radiation–heat converter based on an SAC layer, which demonstrate how this layer is evaporated (
Figure 7).