Next Article in Journal
Introduction to the Special Issue on Structured Light Coherence
Previous Article in Journal
LBFA: A Load-Balanced and Fragmentation-Aware Resource Allocation Algorithm in Space-Division Multiplexing Elastic Optical Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Ultra-Compact and Ultra-Broadband Polarization-Insensitive Mach–Zehnder Interferometer in Silicon-on-Insulator Platform for Quantum Internet Application

1
Institute of Mirco/Nano Optoelectronic and Terahertz Technology, Jiang Su University, Zhenjiang 210010, China
2
Department of Physics, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China
4
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2021, 8(10), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100455
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 12 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Communication and Network)

Abstract

:
Polarization dependence in integrated silicon photonics has a detrimental effect on the manipulation of quantum state with different polarizations in the quantum technology. Those limits have profound implications for further technological developments, especially in quantum photonic internet. Here, we propose a polarization-independent Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) structure based on a 340 nm-thick silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. The MZI facilitates low loss, broad operating bandwidth, and large tolerance of the fabrication imperfection. We achieve an excess loss of <10% and an extinction radio of >18 in the 100 nm bandwidth (1500∼1600 nm) for both transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes. We numerically demonstrate an interference visibility of 99% and a polarization-independent loss (PDL) of 0.03 for both polarizations at 1550 nm. Furthermore, by using the principle of phase compensation and self-image, we shorten the length of the waveguide taper by almost an order of magnitude with the transmission of >95% for both TE and TM polarizations. Up to now, the proposed structure could significantly improve the integration and promote the development of monolithic integrated quantum internet.

1. Introduction

Referring to the development of classical communication, the quantum information network will be the key technology in enabling long-distance quantum communication and assembling compact devices into a larger quantum computing cluster in the future [1]. Large-scale quantum computing and high-dimensional quantum communication suffer from the bulk optical element, bolted onto optical tables in free space and fiber systems [2]. Photonic integrated circuits (PICs) owing their low loss, compactivity and stability, have become a promising platform to realize photonic quantum interconnent. PICs have been demonstrated on different material platforms such as LiNO3, InP and SiN [3,4,5,6]. These waveguide materials with low refractive index contrasts are associated with large footprints and poor scalabilities.
Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) chips, which have high effective refractive index differences ( Δ n 2 ) between silicon and silicon dioxide, mean the silicon-based waveguide devices have strong confinement on light [7]. Compared with other materials, silicon-based devices are smaller in size and more suitable for system integration. Silicon PICs have been used to implement key components for quantum information processing, such as high-dimensional quantum entanglement, quantum walking, CNOT gates and factoring algorithms [8,9]. In quantum technology, the manipulation of a single photon in the time or frequency domain is the basic and key unit operation of quantum information coding/decoding, photon routing and quantum information processing. Most of these technologies require precise interferences, which is determined by the performance of Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) structures.
Various silicon-based MZI structures have been demonstrated [10]. As an important part of the MZI, 3 dB power splitters have been widely studied with a variety of structures such as Y-junctions, directional couplers, grating beam splitters and multimode interference (MMI) couplers [11,12]. Among these structures, MMI-based power splitters have a small footprint, good tolerance to fabrication error and broad bandwidth. In 2012, D. B. et al. utilized an MMI-based MZI structure to realize quantum interference and the manipulation of entanglement in silicon wire waveguide quantum circuits [13]. The visibility of the MMI is 80% with a footprint of 2.8 μm × 27 μm in the SOI platform and a silicon thickness of 220 nm. In order to accurately control linear optical devices for large-scale quantum information processing and other applications [14,15,16], C. M. Wilkes et al. reported a high-extinction auto-configured Mach–Zehnder interferometer with a 60 dB range [17].
However, the MZI devices mentioned above based on SOI are generally polarization sensitive. Due to different effective refraction indexes for two orthogonal polarizations, it is difficult to fulfill the phase-matching condition on the same device [18,19,20], which will induce polarization dependence loss. Thus, as one of degrees of freedom for encoding in quantum information process, polarization dependence loss limits the applicability in communication systems. A possible solution requires quantum interconnections to enable scaling beyond the limit of monolithic integration, and towards multi-chip system, such as in Ref. [21], where the path-to-polarization conversion allows entangled quantum states to be coherently distributed only between silicon photonic integrated circuit and fiber path. Furthermore, the different polarization photons are coupled into a different silicon chip via a 2D grating coupler. The polarization dependent on the silicon-integrated circuit also makes it difficult to realize the point-to-point BB84 quantum key distribution (QKD) [22], let alone the BB84-based network. Therefore, it is meaningful to remove the polarization dependence of the silicon-based MZI. In 2018, D. Dai et al. proposed and experimentally demonstrated a polarization-insensitive 2 × 2 thermo-optic Mach–Zehnder switch by utilizing SOI nanophotonic waveguides with a 340 nm-thick silicon core layer [23]. The extinction ratio of the structure was more than 20 dB in the C-band (1530∼1565 n m ) for both TE and TM polarizations. The MZI arms were designed with square SOI nanophotonic waveguide with a cross section of 340 n m × 340 n m , and could achieve polarization-insensitive phase shift. However, the polarization-dependent loss was as high as 2 dB, and the 50%–50% power-splitting ratio was only in the wavelength range of 1550∼1560 n m , which is quite narrow for accurate photon manipulation. On the other hand, grating coupling was used to upload and download signals in the above references. The input field, which is coupled from fiber-adapted grating couplers, would mismatch with the field in single-mode waveguide. An adiabatic waveguide taper with a length of >400 μ m can solve this problem, the corresponding large footprint degrades the compact of the photonic integrated circuit. Most of the grating couplers such as lens tapers [24], inverse design tapers [25] and interpolation formula tapers [26] are able to reduce the length to ∼40 μ m ; however, these structures always suffer from diffractive apertures which induce extra scattering loss, high crosstalk, uncertain phase variability, or complex fabrication processes, and only operate with TE or TM polarization states. Therefore, the footprint and the polarization dependence of input/output components should be considered in the design of MZI.
In this paper, we proposed a polarization-independent MZI, composed of a 1 × 2 beam splitter, phase shifter, and 2 × 2 beam splitters based on a 340 n m SOI platform, as shown in Figure 1. The 1 × 2 beam splitter utilizes with an MMI structure and has an ultra-short waveguide taper with a length of 20 μ m as the input port. For the experimental condition, the optical field can be injected from a grating coupler which is not shown in Figure 1. In this simulation, the light is directly injected in the taper with the fundamental mode. The input taper then narrows down to 2 μ m wide, being a multi-mode waveguide. The optical field in the multi-mode waveguide is in the first-order transverse electric ( TE 01 / TM 01 ) mode. The multi-mode waveguide separates into two single-mode waveguides by the self-image principle. Then, after two phase-shift paths, the optical field interferes at the 2 × 2 beam splitter with a length of 11.6   μ m and width of 2 μ m [27]. In order to realize the same phase shift, the phase shifter can choose the graphene optical modulator, which can realize the polarization-insensitive modulator by careful design [28,29]. The transmissions of input and output waveguide mode converters are both higher than 95%, with lengths of 24.1   μ m and 27.2   μ m . The visibility of MZI reaches 99% and extinction ratio is >20 dB with a wide wavelength bandwidth of 100 n m (1.5∼ 1.6   μ m ) for both polarizations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The 1 × 2 Beam Splitter Design

Self-imaging principle is usually used to analyze and design MMI-based devices [30]. The fundamental TE/TM mode is input from the single mode waveguide at the center to the multimode waveguide, which excites plenty of higher-order modes in the MMI region. By analyzing the field distribution of different waveguide modes in the multimode region of an MMI coupler, we can obtain the output field in different locations of the MMI coupler. The beat length L π of the fundamental mode and the first-order mode is given by L π = π / Δ β , where Δ β = β 0 β 1 , and β 0 ( β 1 ) indicates the propagation constant of the TE 0 ( TE 1 ) mode or TM 0 ( TM 1 ) mode. When Δ β TE = Δ β TM , the MMI couplers are polarization independent. According to Ref. [23], the polarization-insensitive MMI coupler is designed at the width of 2 μ m based on 340 nm-thickness SOI platform. Using the self-image theory, we obtain the primarily calculated values of the length, width, and gap (between output waveguides) of the multimode of the beam splitter, which are 4 μ m , 2 μ m , and 0.5   μ m , respectively. Using these values as initial values, we simulate the transmission with different multimode waveguide lengths, widths, gaps, and wavelengths at the optimized height of 340 n m . The simulation is performed using 3D Lumerical FDTD solution [31]. The results are shown in Figure 2. We place monitors at the input port and output port, respectively, and finally normalize the energy to obtain the transmission.
Figure 2a shows the transmission versus multimode waveguide length at the width of 2 μ m and gap of 500 n m and the wavelength at the wavelength of 1.55   μ m . At the length of 3.6   μ m to 4.7 μ m , the beam splitter enables high transmission exceeding 40% for both polarizations. Meanwhile, the approximate equability transmission of TE polarization (47.87%) and TM polarization (47.82%) takes place at a length of 4.1   μ m . The polarization dependence loss (PDL), which describes the polarization dependence of devices, reaches 0. Therefore, the optimized length of beam splitters is 4.1   μ m . The total transmission found by summing up the transmission at two channels is more than 95% for both polarizations. On the other hand, the optical field is normally coupled from lensed fibers or fiber-matched grating couplers to the input port of a taper with a 10 μ m wide and 20 μ m long multimode waveguide. The taper converts the multimode to the single mode with an output port of a 500 n m -wide single mode waveguide. Thus, normally the length of the taper should be larger than 400 μ m . Our structure has a length of only 24.1   μ m , which would significantly improve the integration of the photonic integrated circuits.
The width of the MMI is a key parameter for the proposed beam splitter. Figure 2b shows the transmission versus MMI width, with a length of 4.1   μ m and gap width of 500 n m at the wavelength of 1.55   μ m . For the width from 1.9   μ m to 2.1   μ m , the transmission is more than 40% for both polarizations. The structure is polarization independent at the width of 2.0   μ m . The influence of the gap width is shown in Figure 2c. The length of the MMI is set to be 4.1   μ m , the width of the MMI is set to be 2.0   μ m , and the wavelength is 1.55   μ m . In order to avoid energy coupling between the output waveguides, the width of the gap should be no less than 500 n m . Thus, we vary the gap width from 500 n m to 900 n m ; the highest and equal transmission in the output of single mode waveguide 1 (SMW1) and 2 (SMW2) for both polarizations are obtained at the gap width of 500 n m . Additionally, based on the optimized geometric dimension determined above, we obtain the transmission at different wavelengths shown in Figure 2. The transmission is more than 43% for both polarizations with a bandwidth of 100 n m (from 1.5   μ m to 1.6   μ m in wavelength range). The highest transmissions for the TE and TM mode are 48.14% and 48.77%, taking place at 1.51   μ m and 1.6   μ m , respectively, while the 0 PDL takes place at 1.55   μ m . The transmission of the proposed structure is more than 86% for the 1 dB bandwidth ( 100 n m ).
The energy distributions for both polarizations of the 1 × 2 beam splitter are shown in Figure 3. The incident fields for both TE and TM polarizations are converted and split into two single-mode waveguides.

2.2. The Output Taper Design

Similarly to the analysis of 1 × 2 beam splitter for the input port, the output mode converter is a 1 × 1 MMI coupler, which uses the inverted taper instead of the single-mode waveguide as the output port. In order to realize the polarization-independent structure, the width of the multimode waveguide remains 2 μ m . The simulated transmission results with different multimode waveguide lengths and wavelengths are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4a shows the transmission versus the length of the multimode waveguide of the output taper with a width of 2 μ m at the wavelength of 1.55   μ m . At the length of 6.5   μ m to 8 μ m , the output taper enables the high transmission of more than 99% for TE polarization. In particular, a highest transmission of 99.98% for TE polarization is achieved with the transmission of 99.1% for TM polarization at the length of 7.2   μ m . The polarization-dependent loss is only 0.03 dB. With the 7.2   μ m optimized length of the multimode waveguide of the output taper, the total length of the proposed output taper is 27.2   μ m , which is one order of magnitude smaller than the normal waveguide taper with a length of more than 400 μ m [18].
Considering the operating wavelength bandwidth of the proposed 1 × 2 beam splitter, the transmission of the output taper from the wavelength from 1.5   μ m to 1.6   μ m is shown in Figure 4b. At the wavelength range of 100 n m , the output taper displays great performance. The highest transmissions for TE and TM polarization are 99.98% and 99.76% at wavelengths of 1.55   μ m and 1.51   μ m , respectively. Meanwhile, for the whole wavelength ranging from 1.5   μ m to 1.6   μ m , PDLs are always below 0.04 dB and the transmissions are more than 98%.
The output taper can also act as an input taper in the chip-based systems, which can convert the fiber’s size field to the single-mode waveguide field. When two mirror symmetrical output tapers are oppositely connected together, one acts as the input taper, and the other acts as the output taper. The signal loading and downloading can be completed with optical fibers. Figure 5 shows the energy distribution for both polarizations at the center wavelength of 1.55   μ m . The transmissions of 94.4% and 95% for TE and TM polarization are achieved, respectively. The total length is less than 60 μ m , which is less than the normal signal loading and downloading systems with lengths longer than 800 μ m [24]. Additionally, the high performance of such structure enables the accurate testing of the photonic devices.

2.3. The Performance of MZI

If an optical field is present in the input waveguide taper of the 1 × 2 beam splitter, it will be separated into two single-mode waveguides, one of which has an additional phase shift by the phase shifter. Due to the interference, for different phase shifts, we obtain different portion of field at the two output single-mode waveguides of the MMI. With the different polarization of the incident optical field and different phase shifts, the corresponding optical fields in two output tapers are shown in Figure 6. When the TM/TE polarization field is input, with the phase shift of π /2, the field will mostly come out at Channel 1, as shown in Figure 6a,b, while with the 3 π /2 phase shift, the field will mostly come out at Channel 2, as shown in Figure 6c,d. Here, we calculate the extinction ratio at the phase shift of π /2 by E R T E / T M = 10 log P C h 1 , T E / T M P C h 2 , T E / T M [32], where P C h 1 , T E / T M is the transmitted power of Channel 1 with TE or TM polarization and P C h 2 , T E / T M is the transmitted power of Channel 2 with TE or TM polarization. Figure 7 shows the extinction ratio for TE and TM polarizations when the wavelength range varies from 1.5   μ m to 1.6   μ m . The calculated ER of our design is >18 dB in the 100 n m wavelength range for TE and TM polarizations. Then, we investigate the visibility of the proposed MZI structure. By tuning the phase shift of the phase shifter, the output power at Channel 1 and Channel 2 shows the interference fringes. The interference visibility is described as V = P m a x P m i n P m a x + P m i n , where P m a x and P m i n are the maximum and minimum output power of the interference fringe. For Channel 1, we find a visibility of 99.2% and 99.02% for TE and TM polarization at 1550 n m , respectively.

3. Conclusions

In summary, based on standard SOI platforms, we proposed a Mach–Zehnder switch that held the extinction ratio higher than 18 dB with large fabricated tolerance, low crosstalk, and wide operating wavelength bandwidth. By carefully designing the geometric dimension of the 1 × 2 polarization insensitive beam splitter whose input port is an input multimode waveguide taper and outputs are two single mode waveguides based on self-image principle, the size of signal loading/downloading structure for the on-chip systems are reduced by one order of magnitude. In the operating wavelength bandwidth of 100 n m , the total transmissions of the input structure and output structures are more than 95% for both TE and TM polarizaiton with an ultrashort length of 51.3   μ m . Due to the complex mode in optical fiber, the polarization dependence of grating coupling device causes signal loss. Although polarization-maintaining fiber can solve the problem of mode mixing in optical fiber, its high cost and instability are not suitable for a large-scale integrated communication system. Therefore, studying the polarization-insensitive waveguide device is an effective way to solve the above problems. All components of the proposed structure hold great potential applications in the compact integration of the optical integrated circuit. The advantages of polarization insensitivity and the high interference contrast of this work provide an important strategy regarding research of monolithic integrated photonics in sensing, detection, optical computer, and quantum interconnection networks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, J.Z.; writing draft and preparation, H.C.; project administration, J.Y.; drawing work of this paper, X.S., C.M. and H.Z.; formal analysis, Z.Z.; investigation, W.Z., L.L. and Y.Y.; revision: X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60907003, 61805278, 62005107, 62005074); the Foundation of NUDT (JC13-02-13, ZK17-03-01); the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (13JJ3001); the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-0142); the Natural Science Research Project of Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (20KJB140007); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180862, BK20190839); China Postdoctoral Fund (2019M651725).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Politi, A.; Cryan, M.J.; Rarity, J.G.; Yu, S.; O’Brien, J.L. Silica-on-Silicon Waveguide Quantum Circuits. Science 2008, 320, 646–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Matthews, J.; Politi, A.; Stefanov, A.; O’Brien, J.L. Manipulating multi-photon entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bindal, P.; Sharma, A. Modeling of Ti:LiNbO/sub 3/waveguide directional couplers. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1992, 4, 728–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gregory, I.M. Design and Stability Analysis of an Integrated Controller for Highly Flexible Advanced Aircraft Utilizing the Novel Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, M.; Chen, K.; Jin, W.; Chiang, K.S. Electro-optic mode switch based on lithium-niobate Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 4418–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, K. Broadband 2 × 2 lithium niobate electro-optic switch based on a Mach–Zehnder interferometer with counter-tapered directional couplers. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 8164–8168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barth, C.; Wolters, J.; Schell, A.W.; Probst, J.; Schoengen, M.; Löchel, B.; Kowarik, S.; Benson, O. Miniaturized Bragg-grating couplers for SiN-photonic crystal slabs. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 9803–9811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, L.; Xia, L.; Chen, Z.; Chen, L.; Ma, X.S. Three-dimensional entanglement on a silicon chip. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2020, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peruzzo, A.; Lobino, M.; Matthews, J.C.F.; Matsuda, N.; Politi, A.; Poulios, K.; Zhou, X.Q.; Lahini, Y.; Ismail, N.; Wörhoff, K.; et al. Quantum Walks of Correlated Photons. Science 2010, 329, 1500–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tao, S.H.; Fang, Q.; Song, J.F.; Yu, M.B.; Lo, G.Q.; Kwong, D.L. Cascade wide-angle Y-junction 1 × 16 optical power splitter based on silicon wire waveguides on silicon-on-insulator. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 21456–21461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yamada, H.; Tao, C.; Ishida, S.; Arakawa, Y. Optical directional coupler based on Si-wire waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 585–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suzuki, K.; Cong, G.; Tanizawa, K.; Kim, S.H.; Ikeda, K.; Namiki, S.; Kawashima, H. Ultra-high-extinction-ratio 2 × 2 silicon optical switch with variable splitter. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 9086–9092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bonneau, D.; Engin, E.; Ohira, K.; Suzuki, N.; Yoshida, H.; Iizuka, N.; Ezaki, M.; Natarajan, C.M.; Tanner, M.G.; Hadfield, R.H.; et al. Quantum interference and manipulation of entanglement in silicon wire waveguide quantum circuits. New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Paesani, S.; Ding, Y.; Santagati, R.; Skrzypczyk, P.; Salavrakos, A.; Tura, J.; Augusiak, R.; Mančinska, L.; Bacco, D.; et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 2018, 360, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Qiang, X.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Wilkes, C.M.; Loke, T.; O’Gara, S.; Kling, L.; Marshall, G.D.; Santagati, R.; Ralph, T.C.; et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ding, Y.; Bacco, D.; Dalgaard, K.; Cai, X.; Zhou, X.; Rottwitt, K.; Oxenløwe, L.K. High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on multicore fiber using silicon photonic integrated circuits. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2017, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wilkes, C.M.; Qiang, X.; Wang, J.; Santagati, R.; Paesani, S.; Zhou, X.; Miller, D.; Marshall, G.D.; Thompson, M.G.; O’Brien, J.L. 60dB high-extinction auto-configured Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 5318–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, Z.; Tsang, H.K. Experimental demonstration of polarization-insensitive air-cladding grating couplers for silicon-on-insulator waveguides. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 2206–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, Y.; Xiao, J. An Ultracompact Polarization-Insensitive Silicon-Based Strip-to-Slot Power Splitter. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 536–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Liang, L.; Wu, W. Broadband TM-mode-pass polarizer and polarization beam splitter using asymmetrical directional couplers based on silicon subwavelength grating. Opt. Commun. 2018, 407, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Bonneau, D.; Villa, M.; Silverstone, J.W.; Santagati, R.; Miki, S.; Yamashita, T.; Fujiwara, M.; Sasaki, M.; Terai, H.; et al. Chip-to-chip quantum photonic interconnect by path-polarization interconversion. Optica 2016, 3, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bennett, C.; Brassard, G. Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, 9–12 December 1984; pp. 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, S.; Dai, D. Polarization-insensitive 2×2 thermo-optic Mach–Zehnder switch on silicon. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 2531–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; He, X.; Jie, H.; Zhang, Z. Ultrashort and efficient adiabatic waveguide taper based on thin flat focusing lenses. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 19894–19903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, Y.; Sun, W.; Xie, H.; Zhang, N.; Xu, K.; Yao, Y.; Xiao, S.; Song, Q. Adiabatic and Ultracompact Waveguide Tapers Based on Digital Metamaterials. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2019, 25, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sethi, P.; Haldar, A.; Selvaraja, S.K. Ultra-compact low-loss broadband waveguide taper in silicon-on-insulator. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 10196–10203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Kai, G.; Gao, M.; Yang, G.; Yang, J. Design of polarization-insensitive high-visibility silicon-on-insulator quantum interferometer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Shah, M.K.; Lu, R.; Peng, D.; Ma, Y.; Ye, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y. Graphene-Assisted Polarization-Insensitive Electro-absorption Optical Modulator. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2017, 16, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, M.; Yin, X.; Ulin-Avila, E.; Geng, B.; Zentgraf, T.; Ju, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 2011, 474, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soldano, L.B.; Pennings, E.C.M. Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: Principles and applications. J. Light. Technol. 1995, 13, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lumerical FDTD. Available online: https://www.lumerical.com/tcad-products/fdtd/ (accessed on 12 September 2021).
  32. Dai, D.; Wang, Z.; Peters, J.; Bowers, J.E. Compact Polarization Beam Splitter Using an Asymmetrical Mach–Zehnder Interferometer Based on Silicon-on-Insulator Waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2012, 24, 673–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic of the proposed Mach–Zhnder interferometer which mainly contains a 1 × 2 beam splitter, a phase shifter, a 2 × 2 beam splitters, and two output tapers. The length of 1 × 2 BS, output taper, and the footprint of 2 × 2 MMI are 24.1   μ m , 27.2   μ m , and 2 × 11.6   μ m 2 .
Figure 1. The schematic of the proposed Mach–Zhnder interferometer which mainly contains a 1 × 2 beam splitter, a phase shifter, a 2 × 2 beam splitters, and two output tapers. The length of 1 × 2 BS, output taper, and the footprint of 2 × 2 MMI are 24.1   μ m , 27.2   μ m , and 2 × 11.6   μ m 2 .
Photonics 08 00455 g001
Figure 2. The transmission of the beam splitters versus (a) MMI length (b)MMI width (c) MMI gap width of channels (d) wavelength. TE polarization at SMW1: red circle; TE polarization at SMW2: red line; TM polarization at SMW1: blue diamond; TM polarization at SMW2: blue line.
Figure 2. The transmission of the beam splitters versus (a) MMI length (b)MMI width (c) MMI gap width of channels (d) wavelength. TE polarization at SMW1: red circle; TE polarization at SMW2: red line; TM polarization at SMW1: blue diamond; TM polarization at SMW2: blue line.
Photonics 08 00455 g002
Figure 3. Energy distribution for both polarizations of the 1 × 2 beam splitter.
Figure 3. Energy distribution for both polarizations of the 1 × 2 beam splitter.
Photonics 08 00455 g003
Figure 4. The transmission of the output taper versus (a) MMI length and (b) wavelength. TE polarization: red circle; TM polarization: blue diamond.
Figure 4. The transmission of the output taper versus (a) MMI length and (b) wavelength. TE polarization: red circle; TM polarization: blue diamond.
Photonics 08 00455 g004
Figure 5. Energy distribution for both TE and TM polarizations with two output tapers being joined in opposite directions.
Figure 5. Energy distribution for both TE and TM polarizations with two output tapers being joined in opposite directions.
Photonics 08 00455 g005
Figure 6. The output mode profiles for TE and TM polarizations at Channel 1 and Channel 2 with respect to different phase shifts at 1550 n m . (a,c) Output mode profiles of TE polarization with π / 2 and 3 π / 2 phase shift. (b,d) Output mode profiles of TM polarization with π / 2 and 3 π / 2 phase shift.
Figure 6. The output mode profiles for TE and TM polarizations at Channel 1 and Channel 2 with respect to different phase shifts at 1550 n m . (a,c) Output mode profiles of TE polarization with π / 2 and 3 π / 2 phase shift. (b,d) Output mode profiles of TM polarization with π / 2 and 3 π / 2 phase shift.
Photonics 08 00455 g006
Figure 7. The simulated extinction ratio of the MZI for both TE and TM polarizations.
Figure 7. The simulated extinction ratio of the MZI for both TE and TM polarizations.
Photonics 08 00455 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Zhao, W.; Song, X.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, H.; et al. Ultra-Compact and Ultra-Broadband Polarization-Insensitive Mach–Zehnder Interferometer in Silicon-on-Insulator Platform for Quantum Internet Application. Photonics 2021, 8, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100455

AMA Style

Zhang J, Zhang Z, Ma C, Chen X, Liu L, Zhao W, Song X, Zhang H, Yu Y, Chen H, et al. Ultra-Compact and Ultra-Broadband Polarization-Insensitive Mach–Zehnder Interferometer in Silicon-on-Insulator Platform for Quantum Internet Application. Photonics. 2021; 8(10):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jingjing, Zhaojian Zhang, Chao Ma, Xuefeng Chen, Liping Liu, Wei Zhao, Xiaoxian Song, Haiting Zhang, Yu Yu, Huan Chen, and et al. 2021. "Ultra-Compact and Ultra-Broadband Polarization-Insensitive Mach–Zehnder Interferometer in Silicon-on-Insulator Platform for Quantum Internet Application" Photonics 8, no. 10: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100455

APA Style

Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Ma, C., Chen, X., Liu, L., Zhao, W., Song, X., Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Chen, H., & Yang, J. (2021). Ultra-Compact and Ultra-Broadband Polarization-Insensitive Mach–Zehnder Interferometer in Silicon-on-Insulator Platform for Quantum Internet Application. Photonics, 8(10), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8100455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop