Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Double-Layer Thin Film Thickness Measurements Using Modified Sagnac Interferometer with Polarization Phase Shifting Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Real-Time Strain and Elasticity Imaging in Phase-Sensitive Optical Coherence Elastography Using a Computationally Efficient Realization of the Vector Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Narrow-Linewidth Optical Parametric Oscillator Inserted with Fabry–Perot Etalon

1
Advanced Photonics Center, School of Electronic Science & Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2
School of Network and Communication Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2021, 8(12), 528; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120528
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021

Abstract

:
Nowadays, the Fabry–Perot etalon (F–P) has been widely utilized in the optical parametric oscillator (OPO) to improve the filtering performance. In this paper, we reported an F–P etalon composed of two ultra-thin silicon wafers spaced with the air. The linewidth of the signal laser and the threshold are 0.03 nm and 0.6 W, respectively when the proposed etalon is employed to a OPO system based on the MgO-doped LiNbO3 (MgO: PPLN). A stabilized output at 1492.4 nm is obtained, and a tunable, high-precision filtering performance can be achieved by varying the gap distance of the F–P etalon arbitrarily due to its ultra-thin thickness. In addition, the F–P etalon can work on a very wide bandwidth due to its weak absorption during the infrared and terahertz waveband. The high-precision tuning capability and wide-band function of proposed etalon may benefit many applications, including spectroscopy, filtering, and optical communication.

1. Introduction

Optical parametric oscillators (OPO) have been popular for decades due to their superior optical properties such as continuous tuning capability in a wide waveband, narrow linewidth, and high power [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The OPO has been one of the most promising techniques in producing wavelength tunable coherent radiation for various applications. However, the linewidth has become the priority to judge the properties of the OPO. The narrower the linewidth is, the higher the monochromatic energy density will be, which leads to a better coherence [7,8,9]. A narrow linewidth, widely tunable infrared source is of great appeal due to its potential use in molecular detection systems that are sensitive and specific. To work on these applications, a spectral narrowing mechanism is usually introduced to the oscillation system. Several mechanisms have been studied to achieve this purpose.
The most common methods to narrow the linewidth are to introduce the structures such as dispersion prism [10,11], diffraction grating [12], and Fabry–Perot (F–P) etalon [13,14,15] into the OPO system. Although a dispersion prism and the diffraction grating can both narrow the linewidth, the architecture is relatively complex [16,17,18,19,20]. Moreover, the techniques such as injection-seeded and dual-cavity doubly resonant can also be utilized to narrow the linewidth. The techniques of injection seed suffer from the major drawback that the available seed sources generally have limited or no tuning capability. Therefore, that effective injection seeding and narrowband operation of the OPO can be achieved only at a fixed wavelength or over a strictly confined spectral range. As for the techniques of dual-cavity doubly resonant, the singly resonant oscillator has a better beam quality, larger relative delay between the OPO output and pump, and smaller internal peak fluence [21,22]. However, the F–P etalon possesses several advantages such as simple structure, short cavity length, more flexibly tuning capability, and excellent filtering performance compared with other methods, especially in narrowing linewidth [23,24,25,26,27]. Therefore, the F–P etalon has been proposed by many experts for the purpose of intracavity filtering, but the filtering performance still has the potential to be optimized [28,29,30,31]. Thus, the research about the F–P etalon, aiming at narrowing the linewidth of output signal in the OPO cavity, is of significance [32,33].
In this paper, we report an F–P etalon composed of two ultra-thin silicon wafers spaced with the air; when it is employed to a OPO system based on MgO-doped LiNbO3 (MgO: PPLN), the linewidth of the signal laser is merely 0.03 nm, the threshold is 0.6 W, and a stabilized output at 1492.4 nm is obtained. The conversion efficiency is about 1.9%, and it may function on a very wide bandwidth due to the weak absorption of the silicon during the infrared and terahertz waveband. In addition, a tunable, high-precision filtering performance can be achieved through varying the gap distance of the F–P etalon arbitrarily and conveniently due to its ultra-thin thickness. Compared with other methods, although the performance of proposed F–P etalon may not ideal (limited linewidth and low conversion efficiency), its high-precision tuning capability and wide-band function may benefit many applications, including spectroscopy, filtering, and optical communication.

2. The Fabrication and Optical Properties of the Ultra-Thin Silicon Wafers

Nowadays, the F–P etalon has been widely utilized in the OPO system to improve the quality of the output signal laser; there are many optical materials which can be used such as MgF2, CaF2, and Quartz, but silicon holds the advantages of weak absorption in a wide-band and easiness to be fabricated into a thin thickness, which contributes to a high-precision tuning capability. Herein, we designed an F–P etalon consisting of two ultra-thin silicon wafers to improve the performance of OPO. The process of fabricating the ultra-thin silicon wafer contains two main steps: (1) The underlying silicon and the oxide layer of the silicon-on-insulate (SOI) wafer is etched by the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) method; (2) The remaining oxide layer is removed using the wet etched technology to ensure the fabricated silicon wafer uniformly and smoothly. The micrograph of the fabricated ultra-thin wafer is depicted in Figure 1a; it shows that the wafer is smooth and ultra-thin. Figure 1b shows the thickness of the wafer to be about 15.8 μm. The quality of silicon wafers can be optimized in fabrication processes by selecting a proper parameter in experiments, which will influence the transmission spectrum of an F–P etalon and ultimately the quality of output signal beam.
The transmission spectra of two ultra-thin silicon wafers are recorded in Figure 2 separately using an optical testing system (Agilent 8614A, point for the experiment and solid line for the fitting curve). The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the reflection peak is about 9.8 nm at the wavelength of 1.55 μm, and the ratio of the free spectral range (FSR) is about 22.5 nm. The narrow width of FWHM laid a foundation for the fabricated silicon wafer to improve the filtering performance in OPO system.
An F–P etalon was designed using above fabricated silicon wafers spaced with the air. The schematic diagram of the F–P etalon is showed in Figure 3; n is the refractive index of the air, L represents the gap between two dual-thin silicon wafers, and R denotes the reflective of the wafer. The silicon can be adjusted arbitrarily due to its ultra-thin width, which will provide a high-precision tuning capability. In addition, the distance of the gap can be conveniently controlled. Thus, the quality of the output signal laser can be improved greatly by selecting a proper parameter.
The formula of the transmission can be expressed as:
T = 1 1 + 4 R ( 1 R ) 2 sin 2 2 π n L λ
Assuming the output signal intensity without the F–P etalon is I0, the light intensity of each point on the spectrum is I = I0 T(λ) after inserting the F–P etalon, it can be inferred from Equation (1) that the transmission spectrum of the proposed F–P etalon depends on the air gap between two wafers to a great extent. Thus, different filtering performances can be realized by varying the distance of the gap. However, more transmittance at the peak is desirable, while less transmittance near the peak is needed in order to narrow the linewidth effectively. In other words, the F–P etalon with a narrower FWHM will have a better filtering performance. Furthermore, the proposed F–P etalon may function on a very wide bandwidth due to the weak absorption of the silicon during the infrared and terahertz waveband.
The transmission spectra of the F–P etalon with a gap distance of 174.95 μm, 295.95 μm, and 584.38 μm are shown in Figure 4a–c, respectively (point for the experiment and solid line for the fitting curve). Comparing Figure 2 with Figure 4, it can be inferred that the resolution of the F–P etalon is better than the monolithic silicon within the interference reflection peak. The maximum ratio of the free spectral range is increased to 92 nm, leading to a higher quality of intracavity filtering performance than monolithic silicon, which will improve the quality of signal laser and have a potential application in the field of filtering, spectroscopy, and optical communication.

3. Experiment and Discussion

The schematic diagram of the OPO system is presented in Figure 5. The crystal we used is a periodic polarized lithium niobate crystal doped with magnesium oxide (MgO: PPLN, procured from CRYSTECH, China). The polarization period, the aperture, and the crystal length of the PPLN crystal are 29.64 μm, 3 mm × 5 mm, and 50 mm, respectively. It is a type of single-resonant parametric oscillator. The pump source is a Q-switched Nd: YAG laser with a wavelength, pulse duration, and repetition rate of 1064 nm, 36 ns, and 5 kHz, respectively. To optimize the quality of the pump beam and improve the efficiency, the pump pulse is converged into the MgO: PPLN through a lens with a focal length of 20 cm. The temperature is set by an oven (CORP.TC038-PC, HC PHOTONICS); it can realize a range of 30 to 200 °C, and the corresponding output signal laser is 1483 to 1527 nm. A length of 8 cm OPO cavity is employed, which consists of a back-cavity mirror, OM, and an output mirror, OC. The reflector, DM, has a reflectance larger than 99.5% at the wavelength of 1.5 μm while a transmittance larger than 95% at the wavelength of 1064 nm, which can separate the pump laser from the signal laser effectively.
Figure 6 illustrates the relationship between input pump power and output signal power with the F–P etalon inserted and not inserted, respectively (the air gap distance is about 2 mm). The oscillation threshold is about 0.60 W when the F–P etalon is inserted, and the conversion efficiency is decreased due to the extra intracavity loss of the inserted F–P etalon (such as the surface reflection of the silicon for the signal laser). For example, its conversion efficiency has decreased from 7.4% to 1.9% at the pump power of 1.83 W. However, it is notable if we can obtain an ultra-narrow linewidth and a better beam quality at the cost of conversion efficiency as these properties are the primal purposes of designing this type of F–P etalon. The conversion efficiency can be further optimized by improving the quality of the silicon wafers during fabrication processes and selecting a proper parameter in experiment.
Simultaneously, the output spectrum of the signal laser with the pump power of 1.83 W is plotted in Figure 7 when the proposed F–P etalon is absent. The spectrum is analyzed by the spectrograph (bought from Shenzhen Zeruiguang company of China, Anristu MS9740A) with a resolution of 0.03 nm, and the spectrum width of the signal laser is about 0.5 nm. It can also be seen that the beam quality has great potential to be improved.
The output spectrum of the signal laser with the F–P etalon inserted and the simulated transmission spectrum of the F–P etalon are illustrated in Figure 8. It shows that the output of the signal laser has a good beam quality and stability; more importantly, the peak fits well with the simulated results. The spectrum is presented in Figure 8a when the air gap is 4 μm. The output signal peaks are located at the wavelength of 1491.8 nm, 1492.4 nm, and 1492.5 nm, and it is oscillating at the wavelengths of the interfering peak of the F–P etalon. However, when the gap distance of the etalon is decreased to 2 mm, as shown in Figure 8b, the signal laser only appeared at the wavelength of 1492.4 nm, and the linewidth is 0.03 nm. As the 0.03 nm is the maximum resolution of the spectrum analyzer, the actual linewidth of the output signal may be less than 0.03 nm. Compared with Figure 8a,b, it can be seen that the filtering performance can be conveniently controlled by the distance of two wafers, and it will have a high-precision tuning capacity due to the ultra-thin width of the wafers. When comparing Figure 7 with Figure 8, the characteristic of proposed F–P etalon in narrowing linewidth is obvious, and the linewidth has been narrowed from 0.5 nm to less than 0.03 nm. It can be inferred from the output signal that the inserted F–P etalon can achieve a strong linewidth narrowing effect due to the wavelength selection of multiple roundtrips in the oscillation. While forming the F–P etalon using two silicon wafers, this architecture is forming three etalons, two thin wafer etalons, and one air-spaced etalon. As the air-spaced etalon has a larger thickness compared to the wafer etalons, the FSR of the whole system will be the FSR of the thin etalon while placing the F–P etalon inside the cavity. In fact, the OPO cavity has a particular FSR based on its cavity length. For the single-frequency operation of the OPO, a thin etalon with a large FSR, is used to eliminate the mode hopping. In this case, the FSR of the OPO is determined by the FSR of the etalon. Due to the larger FSR, the etalon can suppress the closely spaced wavelengths of the high gain-bandwidth OPO, which leads to a good filtering performance. In addition, a tunable, high-precision signal laser output can be achieved through varying the gap distance of the F–P etalon arbitrarily and conveniently due to its ultra-thin width. Thus, the proposed F–P etalon may have a promising application in the intracavity filtering of OPO cavity.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have reported a Fabry–Perot etalon composed of two ultra-thin silicon wafers spaced with air. When it is employed to a OPO system based on MgO-doped LiNbO3 (MgO: PPLN), the linewidth of the signal laser, threshold, and conversion efficiency are 0.03 nm, 0.6 W, and the 1.9%, respectively. It may function on a very wide bandwidth due to the weak absorption of the silicon during the infrared and terahertz waveband. In addition, a tunable, high-precision signal laser output can be achieved through varying the gap distance of the F–P etalon arbitrarily and conveniently, which may have promising applications in the field of spectroscopy, filtering, and optical communication.

Author Contributions

N.W. and C.L. designed the study, X.H. and Z.Q. prepared the samples and the experiment, and X.H., C.L. and Y.C. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (funding number: 11874107, funder: Changgui Lu).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the school of physics of southeast university provide the equipment of inductively coupled plasma method.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meisenheimer, S.K.; Fürst, J.U.; Buse, K.; Breunig, I. Continuous-wave optical parametric oscillation tunable up to an 8 μm wavelength. Optica 2017, 4, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heng, J.; Liu, P. Enhanced spectral broadening in an optical parametric oscillator based on a PPLN crystal. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 16740–16748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Heng, J.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Z.W. Spectral broadening in chirped-pulse optical parametric oscillators based on KTiOAsO4. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 5085–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, D.; Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Jin, G.-Y. Narrow linewidth 2.1 μm optical parametric oscillator with intra-cavity configuration based on wavelength-locked 878.6 nm in-band pumpin. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 131, 106412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ning, C.X.; Liu, P.; Qin, Y.X.; Zhang, Z.W. Continuous wavelength tuning of nondegenerate femtosecond doubly resonant optical parametric oscillators. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 2551–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Peng, Y.F.; Zhang, J.N.; Wang, Y. High power, twin-band mid-infrared PPMgLN optical parametric oscillator pumped at 1.679 µm. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brosnan, S.; Byer, R.L. Optical parametric oscillator threshold and linewidth studies. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1979, 15, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bosenberg, W.R.; Pelouch, W.S.; Tang, C.L. High-efficiency and narrow-linewidth operation of a two-crystal β-BaB2O4, optical parametric oscillator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1989, 55, 1952–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, W.; Syms, R.R.A.; Stagg, J.A. Lohmann, Precision mems flexure mount for a littman tunable external cavity laser. IEE P-Sci. Meas. Technol. 2004, 151, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Deng, D.; Zhu, X.A.; Zhou, Y.; Kong, Y.; Yan, Z.; Xu, Z. Optical parametric system with a compound cavity and a grazing-incidence prism. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1997, 14, 1496–1500. [Google Scholar]
  11. Samanta, G.K.; Fayaz, G.R.; Sun, Z.; Ebrahim-Zadeh, M. High-power, single-frequency, continuous-wave optical parametric oscillator based on MgO: sPPLT. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Das, S.; Bahuguna, K.C.; Kumar, V. Narrow-band-width infrared radiation from a noncritically phase-matched ZnGeP2, optical parametric oscillator. J. Russ. Laser Res. 2015, 36, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Robertson, G.; Henderson, A.; Dunn, M.H. Efficient, single-axial mode oscillation of a beta barium borate optical parametric oscillator pumped by an excimer laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 62, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huisken, F.; Marquez, J.; Kaloudis, M.; Orlov, S.N.; Smirnov, V.V.; Chuzavkov, Y.L.; Polivanov, Y.N. Single-mode KTiOPO4 optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 1995, 20, 2306. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kleinman, D.A.; Kisliuk, P.P. Discrimination against unwanted orders in the Fabry–Perot resonator. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 2014, 41, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heidemann, K.; Kleemann, B. Littrow Grating and Uses of a Littrow Grating. U.S. Patent 20,020,008,912, 24 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sang, E.P.; Kwon, T.Y.; Shin, E.J.; Lee, H.S. A compact extended-cavity diode laser with a littman configuration. IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 2003, 52, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Balskus, K.; Mccracken, R.A.; Reid, D.T. Mode-resolved 10-Ghz frequency comb from a femtosecond optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 2692–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gloster, L.A.W.; Mckinnie, I.T.; Jiang, Z.X.; King, T.A.; Boonengering, J.M.; Van der Veer, W.E.; Hogervorst, W. Narrow-band b-BaB2O4 optical parametric oscillator in a grazing-incidence configuration. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1995, 12, 2117–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hawthorn, C.J.; Weber, K.P.; Scholten, R.E. Littrow configuration tunable external cavity diode laser with fixed direction output beam. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001, 72, 4477–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wei, J.X.; Chaitanya Kumar, S.; Ebrahim-Zadeh, M. Broadly tunable, intracavity injection-seeded, hybrid optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 4502–4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Liu, G.Y.; Yao, B.Q.; Wang, R.X.; Yang, C.; Duan, X.M.; Dai, T.G.; Wang, Y.Z. Comparison of mid-infrared ZnGeP2 rectangle ring optical parametric oscillators of three types of resonant regimes. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 4163–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kreuzer, L.B. Single mode oscillation of a pulsed singly resonant optical parametric oscillator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1969, 15, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, H.; Arsenijević, D.; Schires, K.; Sadeev, T.; Erasme, D.; Bimberg, D.; Grillot, F. Efficiency of four-wave mixing in injection-locked InAs/GaAs quantum-dot lasers. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 125105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Djukic, D.; Bakhru, H.; Espinola, R.L.; Osgood, R.M.; Roth, R.M.; Bakhru, S.; Izuhara, T. Integrable wide-free-spectral-range Fabry–Perot optical filters using free-standing LiNbO3 thin films. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 994–996. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, S.; Kim, H.N.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, T.; Cho, S.; Kang, H.B.; Hwang, C.S. Design method of tunable pixel with phase—Change material for diffractive optical elements. ETRI J. 2017, 39, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, R.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Chen, J.; Mao, P.; Gao, G.; Zhang, L.B.; Wu, S. Facile fabrication of three-dimensional graphene foam/poly (dimethylsiloxane) composites and their potential application as strain sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014, 6, 13455–13460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ganikhanov, F.; Caughey, T.; Vodopyanov, K.L. Narrow-linewidth middle-infrared ZnGeP2 optical parametric oscillator. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2001, 18, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, S.T.; Lin, Y.Y.; Huang, Y.C.; Chiang, A.C.; Shy, J.T. Continuous-wave, singly resonant OPO at 3μm. Physics 2008, 0803, 2113. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schlup, P.; Butterworth, S.D.; Mckinnie, I.T. Efficient single-frequency pulsed periodically poled lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Commun. 1998, 154, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, B.; Jiang, H.; Wang, R.; Lu, C. Optical fiber fiber Fabry–Perot filter with tunable cavity for high-precision resonance wavelength adjustment. Lightwave Technol. 2015, 33, 2950–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peng, Y.F.; Wei, X.B.; Xie, G.; Gao, J.R.; Li, D.M.; Wang, W.M. A high-power narrow-linewidth optical parametric oscillator based on PPMgLN. Laser Phys. 2013, 23, 055405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Perrett, B.J.; Terry, J.A.C.; Mason, P.D.; Orchard, D.A. Spectral line narrowing in PPLN OPO devices for 1-μm wavelength doubling. SPIE 2004, 5620, 275–279. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Micrograph and (b) thickness of the ultra-thin silicon wafer.
Figure 1. (a) Micrograph and (b) thickness of the ultra-thin silicon wafer.
Photonics 08 00528 g001
Figure 2. Transmission spectra of two ultra-thin silicon wafer.
Figure 2. Transmission spectra of two ultra-thin silicon wafer.
Photonics 08 00528 g002
Figure 3. The Schematic diagram of F–P etalon.
Figure 3. The Schematic diagram of F–P etalon.
Photonics 08 00528 g003
Figure 4. Transmission spectrum of the F–P etalon with a gap distance of (a) 174.95 μm, (b) 295.95 μm, and (c) 584.38 μm, respectively.
Figure 4. Transmission spectrum of the F–P etalon with a gap distance of (a) 174.95 μm, (b) 295.95 μm, and (c) 584.38 μm, respectively.
Photonics 08 00528 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of OPO system.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of OPO system.
Photonics 08 00528 g005
Figure 6. The output power versus the input power (a) without F–P etalon (b) with F–P etalon.
Figure 6. The output power versus the input power (a) without F–P etalon (b) with F–P etalon.
Photonics 08 00528 g006
Figure 7. The output spectrum of signal laser without F–P etalon inserted.
Figure 7. The output spectrum of signal laser without F–P etalon inserted.
Photonics 08 00528 g007
Figure 8. The output signal spectrum when F–P etalon with an air gap of (a) 4 mm (b) 2 mm.
Figure 8. The output signal spectrum when F–P etalon with an air gap of (a) 4 mm (b) 2 mm.
Photonics 08 00528 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, X.; Lu, C.; Wang, N.; Qi, Z.; Cui, Y. A Narrow-Linewidth Optical Parametric Oscillator Inserted with Fabry–Perot Etalon. Photonics 2021, 8, 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120528

AMA Style

Hu X, Lu C, Wang N, Qi Z, Cui Y. A Narrow-Linewidth Optical Parametric Oscillator Inserted with Fabry–Perot Etalon. Photonics. 2021; 8(12):528. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Xuefang, Changgui Lu, Niuniu Wang, Zhengqing Qi, and Yiping Cui. 2021. "A Narrow-Linewidth Optical Parametric Oscillator Inserted with Fabry–Perot Etalon" Photonics 8, no. 12: 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120528

APA Style

Hu, X., Lu, C., Wang, N., Qi, Z., & Cui, Y. (2021). A Narrow-Linewidth Optical Parametric Oscillator Inserted with Fabry–Perot Etalon. Photonics, 8(12), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop