Next Article in Journal
Nonlocal Effective Medium (NLEM) for Quantitative Modelling of Nanoroughness in Spectroscopic Reflectance
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue “Novel Specialty Optical Fibers and Applications”: An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Centimeter-Scale Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers Enabled by Er3+ Upconversion and Green Light-Absorbing Photosensitizer

by
Adilet Zhakeyev
and
Jose Marques-Hueso
*
Institute of Sensors, Signals and Systems, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2022, 9(7), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070498
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Revised: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 16 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optoelectronics and Optical Materials)

Abstract

:
Photopolymer resins used in stereolithographic 3D printing are limited to penetration depths of less than 1 mm. Our approach explores the use of near-infrared (NIR) to visible upconversion (UC) emissions from lanthanide-based phosphors to initiate photopolymer crosslinking at a much higher depth. This concept relies on the use of invisibility windows and non-linear optical effects to achieve selective crosslinking in photopolymers. SLA resin formulation capable of absorbing light in the visible region (420–550 nm) was developed, in order to take advantage of efficient green-UC of Er3+/Yb3+ doped phosphor. NIR-green light UC shows versatility in enhancing curing depths in laser patterning. For instance, a structure with a curing depth of 11 ± 0.2 mm, cured width of 496 ± 5 µm and aspect ratios of over 22.2:1 in a single pass via NIR-green light UC. The penetration depth of the reported formulation approached 39 mm. Therefore, this technique would allow curing depths of up to 4 cm. Moreover, it was also demonstrated that this technique can initiate cross-linking directly at the focal point. This shows the potential of NIR-assisted UC as a low-cost method for direct laser writing in volume and 3D printing.

1. Introduction

Unlike subtractive manufacturing processes, additive manufacturing (AM), also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, can directly produce complex 3D objects with near-complete design freedom and shows promise in markets that have high demand for customization, flexibility, design complexity and low transportation costs [1]. 3D printing techniques based on photopolymerization such as stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP) and two-photon polymerization (2PP) exhibit high resolution compared to other 3D printing techniques, particularly 2PP, which is capable of fabricating structures with sub 100 nm features [2]. In SLA/DLP techniques, the curing depths are limited to hundreds of µm because of the low penetration depths of ultraviolet (UV) and blue light due to the presence of UV/blue light absorbing photoinitators. It was demonstrated by 2PP, which utilizes two-photon absorption (TPA), where a molecule absorbs two photons at the same time by using a virtual state, that the use of a long wavelength excitation source (∼800 nm) allows for deeper penetration into the resin than UV light [3,4]. However, 2PP machines are expensive due to the high-intensity femtosecond lasers, which are required since the absorption cross-section of initiators for the two-photon process is very small. Moreover, the time-consuming spot-by-spot printing process and small working distances (<380 µm) of the focusing optics limit the overall size of fabricated objects, which makes 2PP more suitable for fabrication of nano/microstructures.
Upconversion (UC) involves the sequential absorption of low-energy photons (e.g., NIR) before the subsequent emission of a relatively higher energy photon (e.g., UV/visible). Lanthanide-based UC phosphors have real energy levels, so the probability of transition for a two-photon process can be approximately one million times higher than systems that use virtual energy levels (TPA, second-harmonic generation, etc.), hence the power of the excitation laser can be much smaller and inexpensive diode lasers can be used [5]. It was recently demonstrated that NIR to UV/blue UC based on thulium (Tm3+) and ytterbium (Yb3+) co-doped sodium yttrium fluoride (NaYF4) can be used for ultra-deep photopolymerization, reaching curing depths of more than 13 cm [6]. Tm3+ doped crystals were also demonstrated to show potential in 3D printing applications [7,8]. In UC, the emission intensity is proportional to the nth power of the excitation intensity, with n representing the number of excitation photons required per emitted photon [9]. In the aforementioned Tm3+/Yb3+ doped systems used to enhance photopolymerizations, the 1G43H6 (475 nm) transition is a three-photon process (n = 3), whilst 1D23H6 (360 nm) and 1D23F4 (450 nm) transitions require four-photon processes (n = 4) [10,11]. Moreover, traditional UV or blue light absorbing photoinitiators used in the previous similar studies are not biocompatible, due to toxicity [12].
Erbium (Er3+)/Yb3+ co-doped NaYF4 is one of the most efficient UC materials [13,14,15]. The green emissions from 2H11/24I15/2 (525 nm) and 4S3/24I15/2 (547 nm) transitions in Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped systems, as shown in Figure 1a, typically involve two-photon UC (n = 2) [5,16,17]. This article is an extended version of a brief conference abstract published in reference [18]. Herein, we utilize efficient NIR (980 nm) to green light UC (Figure 2a,b) of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ phosphor for laser patterning of structures with high curing depths, as well as demonstrating the possibility of photocuring directly in volume similar to 2PP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of UC-assisted laser patterning of photopolymers achieved with the green Er3+ UC emissions, instead of the systems based on UV and/or blue Tm3+ UC emissions used in the previous studies. The enabling factor for using the green UC, is the synergistic addition of Eosin Y, a visible-light absorbing dye (420–550 nm) and triethanolamine (TEA), as a co-initiator, that bridges the gap towards photopolymerization, as illustrated in Figure 1b [19,20]. Moreover, Eosin Y is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved photoinitiator, and can be activated with a green light, circumventing the harmful effects from traditionally used UV light, such as DNA damage, accelerated aging of tissues and cancer [20]. This expands the potential of UC-assisted photopolymerization in fabrication of biocompatible objects and devices in situ. The versatility of Er3+ based formulation was demonstrated in laser patterning of structures with high aspect ratios, as well as ability to only print at the focal point of the laser.

2. Materials and Methods

The NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor, Eosin Y and TEA were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Clear resin (FLGPCL04) was obtained from Formlabs (Somerville, MA, USA). UV/Vis spectra were recorded in a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 spectrometer. The information on functional groups in resin and laser patterned samples was analyzed in the Nicolet Summit FTIR with a built-in mid- and far-IR attenuated total reflection (ATR) diamond (iD7, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The double bond conversion was calculated using a method described in literature [21]. The refractive index of Formlabs Clear resin was obtained in an Abbe refractometer (2WAJ, Newtry, Shenzhen, China). Laser patterning was performed using a 980 nm laser diode (OFL371, OdicForce Lasers, Surbiton, UK) and a two-axis stage with a stepper motor controller (A-MCB2, Zaber Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). A calibrated spectrofluorometer (FLS920, Edinburgh Instruments, Livingston, UK) was used for spectral measurements, equipped with a 102 mm inner diameter integrating sphere (HORIBA Jobin-Yvon, Edison, NJ, USA) and a 980 nm laser diode (LSR980NL-3W, Lasever Inc., Ningbo, China) used for excitation. As shown in Equation (1) [14], the external photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) was determined by dividing the number of emitted photons ( N em ) by the number of absorbed photons ( N abs ):
PLQY = # photons   emitted # photons   absorbed   = N em ( λ ex ) N abs ( λ ex )  
Further details for PLQY measurements can be found in reference [10].

3. Results and Discussion

As Figure 2 shows, bulk NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ powder exhibits prominent green (540 nm) and red (660 nm) emissions, as well as small emissions in the blue (410 nm) and UV (380 nm) regions, upon excitation with a 980 nm laser. As expected, the emission intensity increases with a rising excitation power density (Figure 2b).
Figure 3a shows that at power densities above 4 W cm−2 the emission intensity of red (600–700 nm), green (500–600 nm) and UV/blue (350–425 nm) emissions exhibit a linear relationship with an increase in power density. At laser excitation power density of 17 W cm−2 PLQY reaches values of 2.3% for red (600–700 nm), 1.4% for green (500–600 nm) and 0.1% for UV/blue (350–425 nm) emissions, respectively. PLQY reaches saturation and starts to decrease slightly when the excitation power density exceeds 25 W cm−2 as depicted in Figure 3c. It was reported for similar micrometer-sized NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ phosphors that PLQY exhibits saturation in high power density regime [15,22]. For instance, Kaiser et al. reported that PLQY (integrated over all emission bands) reaches a maximum value of 10.5% at a power density of 30 W cm−2, after which saturation was observed [22]. Moreover, it was also reported that at excitation power densities exceeding 10 W cm−2, thermal effects become influential in bulk UC phosphors [23].
The refractive index of Formlabs Clear resin was measured to be 1.479, which matches the refractive index of NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor (np = 1.48) [24]. As a result, this SLA resin was chosen for this study to minimize scattering effects. In order to utilize the emission profile of NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ for photopolymerization of SLA resin (Formlabs Clear), a suitable photoinitator must be employed. Most of the commercially available photoinitiators are Norrish Type I initiators, which cleave into free-radical fragments upon light absorption [25,26,27]. Commonly used benzil ketal photoinitiators (Irgacure 184, Irgacure 369, Irgacure 651 and Irgacure 1173) exhibit fairly low energy n → π* transitions, absorbing light in the UVB and UVA region (up to 350 nm) [26]. In phosphine oxide-based photoinitiators (Irgacure 819, TPO, TPO-L and LAP), the phosphorous atom lowers the energy level of the π* state. As a result, the peak of n → π* transition is shifted towards 400 nm [25]. Germanium-based photoinitiators such as Ivocerin exhibit a significant redshift of n → π* transition, showing a strong absorption in the blue light region (λmax = 408 nm) [28,29]. Another example of metallocene initiators include titanocenes, such as fluorinated diaryl titanocene (Irgacure 784) and bis(pentafluorophenyl)titanocene, which exhibits λmax at 465 nm. Formlabs Clear resin already contains a proprietary Type I initiator, which absorbs light up to 420 nm and matches the 410 nm emission peak of NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ as illustrated in Figure 4a. However, Type I initiators are not suited for excitation with the green emissions (500–575 nm) of NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor.
Type II photoinitiating systems usually consist of an uncleavable photosensitizer (CQ, benzophenones, thioxanthones, etc.) and a co-initiator (usually tertiary amines) [26]. Upon absorption of the light of an appropriate wavelength, photosensitizers form excited triplet state and undergo hydrogen abstraction or electron transfer in the presence of a co-initiator [25]. Eosin Y is a photosensitizer, which exhibits maximum absorbance at 530 nm and closely matches the green emissions of NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ as shown in Figure 4a. When used alongside a co-initiator (synergist), such as TEA, it can be effectively used as a type II photoinitiator in photopolymerization reactions (Figure 1b).
Figure 4b depicts the comparison of Formlabs Clear resin with different NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ concentrations with respect to transmission at 980 nm. In order to ensure sufficient transmission of excitation light, the phosphor concentration of 5 mg mL−1 was chosen, which shows transmittance of 72% for a 10 mm light path at 980 nm (molar extinction coefficient = 5.1 M−1 cm−1). At this concentration, the penetration depth (37% I/I0) was measured to be 39 mm as shown in Figure 4c. Figure 5 illustrates that the formulation containing Eosin Y effectively absorbs the upconverted green emissions, with only red emissions visible. Initial observations reveal that the stability of the photosensitive resin is similar to commercial formulations, and there is no accelerated degrading. FTIR spectra of samples before and after laser patterning were collected in order to establish the double bond conversion (DBC) achievable via UC-assisted cross-linking, as shown in Figure 6. This was achieved by observing aliphatic C=C bond (1637 cm−1) conversion with respect to the carbonyl C=O peak (1697 cm−1) as the internal standard. The laser patterning of Formlabs Clear resin with the green Er3+ emissions, resulted in the DBC of 49%. This compares well with the previously reported DBC of around 40% for blank Formlabs Clear resin after 60 s of irradiation with UV light [30].
This formulation was used for laser patterning of Formlabs Clear resin with a 980 nm laser diode. At the laser power of 200 mW and laser scanning speed of 0.02 mm s−1, cross-linking all the way up to the surface of the resin was achieved in a single pass, resulting in curing depth of 11 ± 0.2 mm, cured width of 496 ± 5 µm and aspect ratios of over 22.2:1 as shown in Figure 7. Since the penetration depth of this formulation is 39 mm, technically curing depths of up to 4 cm can be achieved.
Moreover, NIR-green light UC allows for selective cross-linking at the focal point of the laser, with the cured width of 437 ± 9 µm as shown in Figure 8. This was achieved when the laser power was set to 240 mW, laser scanning speed to 0.2 mm s−1 and number of passes = 4. This demonstrates that this technique shows potential in high-yield and inexpensive “direct laser writing” (DLW) 3D printing, by using a low-cost 980 nm laser diode (<£30), in comparison to the high-intensity femtosecond lasers used in 2PP.

4. Conclusions

A new formulation based on Eosin Y and NIR-green light UC has enabled the patterning of structures with curing depths of over 10 mm, compared to less than 1 mm achieved in traditional UV/blue light-based curing and 3D printing techniques. This method allows the transformation of photopolymerization from thin 2D layers to the fabrication of thick 3D layers with high aspect ratios in just one passing. This technique has shown the capability of producing samples with 22.2:1 aspect ratio. Moreover, this technique can also be applied as a low-cost method for DLW 3D printing, opening the door for new approaches, such as multi-material SLA.

Author Contributions

Experimental investigation, analysis and writing—original draft preparation, A.Z. Conceptualization, project management, funding and supervision, J.M.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work is supported by UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) Grant EP/T013680/1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom (EPSRC) Grant EP/T013680/1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weller, C.; Kleer, R.; Piller, F.T. Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, S.-H.; Yang, D.-Y.; Lee, K.-S. Two-photon stereolithography for realizing ultraprecise three-dimensional nano/microdevices. Laser Photon. Rev. 2009, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malval, J.-P.; Jin, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Chaumeil, H.; Defoin, A.; Soppera, O.; Scheul, T.; Bouriau, M.; Baldeck, P.L. Enhancement of the Two-Photon Initiating Efficiency of a Thioxanthone Derivative through a Chevron-Shaped Architecture. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 3411–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Z.; Pucher, N.; Cicha, K.; Torgersen, J.; Ligon, S.C.; Ajami, A.; Husinsky, W.; Rosspeintner, A.; Vauthey, E.; Naumov, S.; et al. A Straightforward Synthesis and Structure–Activity Relationship of Highly Efficient Initiators for Two-Photon Polymerization. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Auzel, F. Upconversion and Anti-Stokes Processes with f and d Ions in Solids. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 139–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, R.; Chen, H.; Li, Z.; Shi, F.; Liu, X. Extremely deep photopolymerization using upconversion particles as internal lamps. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 2457–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Méndez-Ramos, J.; Ruiz-Morales, J.C.; Acosta-Mora, P.; Khaidukov, N.M. Infrared-light induced curing of photosensitive resins through photon up-conversion for novel cost-effective luminescent 3D-printing technology. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rocheva, V.V.; Koroleva, A.V.; Savelyev, A.G.; Khaydukov, K.V.; Generalova, A.N.; Nechaev, A.V.; Guller, A.E.; Semchishen, V.A.; Chichkov, B.N.; Khaydukov, E.V. High-resolution 3D photopolymerization assisted by upconversion nanoparticles for rapid prototyping applications. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pollnau, M.; Gamelin, D.R.; Lüthi, S.R.; Güdel, H.U.; Hehlen, M.P. Power dependence of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide and transition-metal-ion systems. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 3337–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alyatkin, S.; Asharchuk, I.; Khaydukov, K.; Nechaev, A.; Lebedev, O.; Vainer, Y.; Semchishen, V.; Khaydukov, E. The influence of energy migration on luminescence kinetics parameters in upconversion nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2016, 28, 35401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, G.; Qin, W.; Wang, L.; Wei, G.; Zhu, P.; Kim, R. Intense ultraviolet upconversion luminescence from hexagonal NaYF4:Yb3+/Tm3+ microcrystals. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 11907–11914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carve, M.; Wlodkowic, D. 3D-Printed Chips: Compatibility of Additive Manufacturing Photopolymeric Substrata with Biological Applications. Micromachines 2018, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. MacDougall, S.K.W.; Ivaturi, A.; Marques-Hueso, J.; Krämer, K.W.; Richards, B.S. Ultra-high photoluminescent quantum yield of β-NaYF4: 10% Er3+ via broadband excitation of upconversion for photovoltaic devices. Opt. Express 2012, 20, A879–A887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jones, C.M.S.; Gakamsky, A.; Marques-Hueso, J. The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): A review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2021, 22, 810–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, C.M.S.; Biner, D.; Misopoulos, S.; Krämer, K.W.; Marques-Hueso, J. Optimized photoluminescence quantum yield in upconversion composites considering the scattering, inner-filter effects, thickness, self-absorption, and temperature. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, M.; Chen, D.; Yin, S.; Ji, Z.; Zhong, J.; Ni, Y.; Lu, C.; Xu, Z. Simultaneous morphology manipulation and upconversion luminescence enhancement of β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ microcrystals by simply tuning the KF dosage. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bednarkiewicz, A.; Wawrzynczyk, D.; Gagor, A.; Kepinski, L.; Kurnatowska, M.; Krajczyk, L.; Nyk, M.; Samoc, M.; Strek, W. Giant enhancement of upconversion in ultra-small Er3+/Yb3+:NaYF4 nanoparticles via laser annealing. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 145705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhakeyev, A.; Marques-Hueso, J. Nonlinear Upconversion Effect for Enhancement of Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Optics, Photonics and Lasers (OPAL’ 22), Tenerife (Canary Islands), Spain, 18–20 May 2022; Yurish, S., Ed.; IFSA Publishing: Barcelona, Spain, 2022; pp. 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaastrup, K.; Sikes, H.D. Using photo-initiated polymerization reactions to detect molecular recognition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noshadi, I.; Hong, S.; Sullivan, K.E.; Shirzaei Sani, E.; Portillo-Lara, R.; Tamayol, A.; Shin, S.R.; Gao, A.E.; Stoppel, W.L.; Black III, L.D.; et al. In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 2093–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rueggeberg, F.A.; Hashinger, D.T.; Fairhurst, C.W. Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. Dent. Mater. 1990, 6, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaiser, M.; Würth, C.; Kraft, M.; Hyppänen, I.; Soukka, T.; Resch-Genger, U. Power-dependent upconversion quantum yield of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ nano- and micrometer-sized particles—measurements and simulations. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 10051–10058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Joseph, R.E.; Jiménez, C.; Hudry, D.; Gao, G.; Busko, D.; Biner, D.; Turshatov, A.; Krämer, K.; Richards, B.S.; Howard, I.A. Critical Power Density: A Metric To Compare the Excitation Power Density Dependence of Photon Upconversion in Different Inorganic Host Materials. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 6799–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jones, C.M.S.; Panov, N.; Skripka, A.; Gibbons, J.; Hesse, F.; Bos, J.-W.G.; Wang, X.; Vetrone, F.; Chen, G.; Hemmer, E.; et al. Effect of light scattering on upconversion photoluminescence quantum yield in microscale-to-nanoscale materials. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 22803–22818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bagheri, A.; Jin, J. Photopolymerization in 3D Printing. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ligon, S.C.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J.; Gurr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10212–10290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, J.; Xiao, P. 3D printing of photopolymers. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 1530–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moszner, N.; Zeuner, F.; Lamparth, I.; Fischer, U.K. Benzoylgermanium Derivatives as Novel Visible-Light Photoinitiators for Dental Composites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2009, 294, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ganster, B.; Fischer, U.K.; Moszner, N.; Liska, R. New Photocleavable Structures, 4. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2008, 29, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhakeyev, A.; Jones, M.C.; Thomson, C.G.; Tobin, J.M.; Wang, H.; Vilela, F.; Xuan, J. Additive manufacturing of intricate and inherently photocatalytic flow reactor components. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 38, 101828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Energy level diagram of UC processes in phosphors co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+; (b) schematic diagram of type II photoinitator system based on Eosin Y, used for cross-linking via green UC emissions (* denotes the exited state of Eosin Y).
Figure 1. (a) Energy level diagram of UC processes in phosphors co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+; (b) schematic diagram of type II photoinitator system based on Eosin Y, used for cross-linking via green UC emissions (* denotes the exited state of Eosin Y).
Photonics 09 00498 g001
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of NIR-green light upconversion; (b) emission profile of bulk NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor at different 980 nm laser excitation powers densities.
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of NIR-green light upconversion; (b) emission profile of bulk NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor at different 980 nm laser excitation powers densities.
Photonics 09 00498 g002
Figure 3. The following data was obtained for NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor at different 980 nm laser excitation power densities: (a) integrated emission; (b) absorption; (c) PLQY.
Figure 3. The following data was obtained for NaYF4:(20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ phosphor at different 980 nm laser excitation power densities: (a) integrated emission; (b) absorption; (c) PLQY.
Photonics 09 00498 g003
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectrum of the photoinitiation system matched with phosphor emissions; (b) transmittance @ 980 nm of resin formulation with different NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ loadings; (c) transmittance @ 980 nm of 5 mg mL NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ loading at different path lengths.
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectrum of the photoinitiation system matched with phosphor emissions; (b) transmittance @ 980 nm of resin formulation with different NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ loadings; (c) transmittance @ 980 nm of 5 mg mL NaYF4: (20%)Yb3+, (3%)Er3+ loading at different path lengths.
Photonics 09 00498 g004
Figure 5. Resin formulation: (a) without; (b) with 0.05 wt% Eosin Y and 2.5 wt% TEA upon excitation with a 980 nm laser.
Figure 5. Resin formulation: (a) without; (b) with 0.05 wt% Eosin Y and 2.5 wt% TEA upon excitation with a 980 nm laser.
Photonics 09 00498 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of FTIR spectra of 0.05 wt% Eosin Y and 2.5 wt% TEA samples before and after crosslinking: (a) full range; (b) 1550 to 1800 cm−1.
Figure 6. Comparison of FTIR spectra of 0.05 wt% Eosin Y and 2.5 wt% TEA samples before and after crosslinking: (a) full range; (b) 1550 to 1800 cm−1.
Photonics 09 00498 g006
Figure 7. NIR-green light UC assisted laser patterning of a 3D structure in a single pass: (a) photograph; (b) optical microscope image of the top-down view of the sample.
Figure 7. NIR-green light UC assisted laser patterning of a 3D structure in a single pass: (a) photograph; (b) optical microscope image of the top-down view of the sample.
Photonics 09 00498 g007
Figure 8. NIR-green light UC assisted laser cross-linking at the focal point: (a) photograph; (b) optical microscope image the top-down view of the sample.
Figure 8. NIR-green light UC assisted laser cross-linking at the focal point: (a) photograph; (b) optical microscope image the top-down view of the sample.
Photonics 09 00498 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhakeyev, A.; Marques-Hueso, J. Centimeter-Scale Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers Enabled by Er3+ Upconversion and Green Light-Absorbing Photosensitizer. Photonics 2022, 9, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070498

AMA Style

Zhakeyev A, Marques-Hueso J. Centimeter-Scale Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers Enabled by Er3+ Upconversion and Green Light-Absorbing Photosensitizer. Photonics. 2022; 9(7):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhakeyev, Adilet, and Jose Marques-Hueso. 2022. "Centimeter-Scale Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers Enabled by Er3+ Upconversion and Green Light-Absorbing Photosensitizer" Photonics 9, no. 7: 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070498

APA Style

Zhakeyev, A., & Marques-Hueso, J. (2022). Centimeter-Scale Curing Depths in Laser-Assisted 3D Printing of Photopolymers Enabled by Er3+ Upconversion and Green Light-Absorbing Photosensitizer. Photonics, 9(7), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop