Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Flavor Instability of Beer (Part 2): The Influence of De Novo Formation of Aging Aldehydes
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Bioactive Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Edible Bean Extracts of 50 Fabaceae Populations Grown in Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
How Do Consumers Perceive Sensory Attributes of Apple?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Seed-Derived Peptides Reduce Blood Pressure by Interacting with the Catalytic Site of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UPLC-MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory, Cholinesterase Inhibitory, and Cardiovascular Protection Potentials of Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis Perr.) Mulberry Branch Extract

1
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Key Laboratory of Sericultural Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2659; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112659
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 28 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021

Abstract

:
As a by-product in the sericulture industry, mulberry branches are not currently utilized effectively. Jialing 20 is an artificial triploids mulberry that widely cultivated in southwest China. In this study, the chemical composition of the Jialing 20 mulberry branch extract (MBE) was first analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS, and 42 components, including alkaloids, flavonoids, and coumarins, were obtained. Then, the antioxidant activities, hypoglycemic effect, Alzheimer’s disease inhibition, and cardiovascular protection of MBE were also evaluated in vitro. The IC50 values for the scavenging DPPH and ABTS radicals were, respectively, 31.23 ± 0.57 μg/mL and 8.88 ± 0.36 μg/mL (IC50 values of positive Vc were, respectively, 4.41 ± 0.19 μg/mL and 8.79 ± 0.41 μg/mL). The IC50 value for inhibiting α-glucosidase was 1.90 ± 0.05 μg/mL (IC50 value of positive acarbose was 0.03 μg/mL). The IC50 values for inhibiting acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase were, respectively, 179.47 ± 0.38 μg/mL and 101.82 ± 3.37 μg/mL (IC50 values of positive berberine were, respectively, 1.27 ± 0.03 μg/mL and 57.41 ± 0.21 μg/mL). MBE (10 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) significantly increased the survival rate of oxidized low-density lipoprotein- (ox-LDL) induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and significantly decreased the intracellular reactive oxygen species. These results suggest that the extracts of Jialing 20 mulberry branches could be used as a functional food additive.

1. Introduction

Mulberry is a common cash crop in Asia [1]. Mulberry fruits are usually consumed as fresh fruit and the raw material for the production of delicious juices and jams. Mulberry leaves are used to feed domestic silkworms or are made into mulberry tea. However, mulberry branches, which need to be cut regularly every year, are underutilized [2]. Mulberry branches, also known as Ramulus mori (RM), are included in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia as a herbal beverage, and mulberry branch extract (MBE) has been approved as a food source by the Chinese and Korean governments [3,4], indicating that MBE is safe for consumption. Mulberry branches are rich in active components such as flavonoids [5], alkaloids [1], and polysaccharides [6], which have various activities such as antioxidation [7] and hypoglycemic effects [8]. However, the chemical composition and biological activities of MBE of different varieties of mulberry trees vary greatly [7,9,10]. Jialing 20 is an artificially bred triploid mulberry variety and is widely cultivated in southwest China because its leaf and branch yields are significantly better than those of other varieties [11]. In our previous study, 10 components, including mulberroside A, were isolated and identified from MBE of Jialing 20, and the content of mulberroside A in Jialing 20 was found to be significantly higher than that in other cultivars. Mulberroside A is the main bioactive component in mulberry branches [12] and can ameliorate diabetic endotoxemia [13] and protect against hepatic damage [14,15]. However, the active components or biological activities of MBE of Jialing 20 have not been comprehensively explored.
Age-related diseases, including diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and cardiovascular diseases, threaten the health of middle-aged and elderly people [16]. Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease that is characterized by hyperglycemia, and more than 90% diabetic patients have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) [17]. α-Glucosidase inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes [18]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a common degenerative disease of the central nervous system that is characterized by memory and cognitive dysfunction and the decreased ability to perform daily living activities [19]. Cholinesterase inhibitors are currently the main drugs used to relieve AD symptoms [20]. Atherosclerosis (AS) is a common cardiovascular disease, and its development is closely related to the endothelial cell damage mechanism [21]. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) can cause vascular endothelial cell damage and dysfunction through various pathways and can thus promote the development of atherosclerosis [22]. ox-LDL-induced vascular endothelial cell damage is a common mechanism for cardiovascular diseases [23]. In the elderly population, several diseases often occur simultaneously, and the occurrence and development process of these diseases is accompanied by oxidative stress and free radical damage [24,25]. Recent studies have shown that adding antioxidants to the body system can prevent and treat the diseases caused by free radicals and the related oxidative stress [26,27]. Therefore, antioxidation and free radical scavenging are important ways to prevent and treat these diseases. Functional food ingredients are substances that are intended to produce a positive effect on health beyond basic nutrition [28]. It is important to search for food ingredient that have the ability to prevent and treat these diseases.
LC-MS is an important technique in natural product research that is widely applied in phytochemical composition analysis [29]. In this study, the small-molecular-weight components in MBE of Jialing 20 were firstly isolated and analyzed by means of UPLC-MS/MS. In addition, in vitro antioxidation activities, the inhibition of α-glucosidase and cholinesterase, and protection against ox-LDL-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) damage, were explored. The current study provides a theoretical basis for the effective utilization of the mulberry branches of Jialing 20 in functional foods for hypoglycemia treatment, Alzheimer’s disease prevention, and cardiovascular protection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation and Extraction

Jialing 20 mulberry branches were cut in the winter from the mulberry garden of Southwest University (29°49′18″ N latitude, 106°24′51″ E longitude), dried at 50 °C using a DHG Series Heating and Drying Oven (Keelrein, Shanghai, China) and crushed using a High-Speed Multi-Purpase Disintegerator 500A (Chencan, Yongkang, China), and then extracted for 30 min by adding methanol at a material-to-liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v) with the aid of ultrasound (700 w, 30 min) at room temperature. The extraction step was repeated four times. The extract was evaporated at 50 °C using a rotary evaporator Rotavapor R-100 (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) and was then freeze-dried using a vacuum freeze dryer Lab-1C-50E (Biocool, Beijing, China) to obtain mulberry branch extract (MBE).

2.2. Chemicals

Acetonitrile, 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 4-Nitrophenyl α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG), 5,5′-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), Acetylthiocholine iodide (ATC), and S-Butyrylthiocholine iodide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). α-Glucosidase was obtained from Solarbio (Beijing, China). Vitamin C (Vc) was obtained from Keshi (Chengdu, China).

2.3. UPLC-MS/MS Analysis

2.3.1. Chromatographic Conditions

A Nexera LC-30A liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) column was used under the following conditions: 30 °C, an injection volume of 2 μL, mobile phase A of 0.1% formic acid–water, and mobile phase B of 0.1% formic acid–acetonitrile. The elution procedure was set as: 0–3.5 min, 5–15% B; 3.5–6 min, 30% B; 6–12 min, 30–70% B; 12–12.5 min, 70% B; 12.5–18 min, 70–100% B; 18–25 min, and 100% B.

2.3.2. Mass Spectrometry Conditions

A TripleTOFTM 5600+ MS system (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) with an electrospray ion source and an Analyst TF 1.7.1 workstation (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) was used. The primary and secondary mass spectrometry data acquisitions were performed by using TOF-MS-Product Ion-IDA with a scan range of 50 to 1500 m/z. The mass spectrometry parameters were set as follows: declustering voltage of 100 eV or −100 eV and focusing voltage of 10 eV or −10 eV; secondary bombardment energy of 40 eV or −40 eV; collision energy spread (CES) of 20 V; and spray voltage of 5500 V (positive ion mode) or −4000 V (negative ion mode).

2.3.3. Mass Spectrometry Data Processing

The data collected by mass spectrometry were first imported into Progenesis QI software (Waters, USA, Milford, MA, USA). Then, corresponding charge forms were selected for peak matching, alignment, and extraction. Then, the obtained results were matched with the secondary mass spectrometry database for screening and identification based on the literature.

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

2.4.1. Scavenging of DPPH Radicals

The scavenging capacity of DPPH radicals was determined according to the previous method [30], with minor modifications. Then, 100 μL of 200 μM DPPH solution was dissolved in ethanol, which was then mixed with the same volume of different concentrations of MBE in a 96-well microtiter plate. After the reaction proceeded at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 520 nm three times using an imark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and water-soluble vitamin C was used as a positive control. The DPPH radical scavenging rate was calculated as:
D = A 0 A 1 A 0 × 100 %
where D is DPPH radical scavenging rate (%); A0 is the absorbance of the negative control; and A1 is the absorbance of the sample. The semi-inhibitory concentration (IC50) of DPPH radicals is calculated according to the derivation of the logarithm of the substrate concentration with respect to inhibition rate.

2.4.2. Scavenging of ABTS Radicals

The scavenging capacity of ABTS radicals was determined according to the previous method [31], with minor modifications. First, 7 mM ABTS was mixed with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and was incubated in the dark for 12 h. Then, the mixture was diluted to a concentration with an absorbance of 0.700 ± 0.05 at 734 nm. Then, 20 μL of the sample was mixed with 180 μL of the radical solution for a 6 min reaction in the dark. Finally, the absorbances were measured at 734 nm three times using an imark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), while vitamin C was used as a positive control. The ABTS radical scavenging rate was calculated as:
A = A 0 A 1 A 0 × 100 %
where A is the ABTS radical scavenging rate (%); A0 is the absorbance of the negative control; and A1 is the absorbance of the sample.

2.5. Inhibition of α-Glucosidase Activity

The inhibition of α-glucosidase activity was determined according to the previous method [32]. An amount of 50 μL of each sample was to be tested, and 50 μL of α-glucosidase (0.5 U/mL) and 50 μL of phosphate buffer (67 mM, pH 6.8) were mixed thoroughly and were kept at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, 50 μL of 6 mM pNPG was added, and the reaction proceeded at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, the reaction was terminated by adding 60 μL of 1 M Na2CO3. Three replicates were set for each group. Then, 200 μL of the solution was added in a 96-well plate, and the absorbance value was measured at 405 nm with an imark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in triplicate (n = 3). The inhibition rate was calculated as:
α G l u c o s i d a s e   I n i b i t i o n   ( % ) = ( 1 A 1 A 2 A 0 A 2 ) × 100 %
where A1 is the absorbance value of each sample; A2 is the absorbance value of each sample without the enzyme; and A0 is the absorbance value of the group without sample.

2.6. Inhibition of Cholinesterase Activity

The inhibition of cholinesterase activity was determined according to the previous method [33], with minor modifications. First, 40 μL of PBS (pH 8.0, 100 mM), 20 μL of DTNB (2 mM), 10 μL of AChE (0.75 U/mL), and 10 μL of samples of different concentrations were mixed followed by the rapid addition of 20 μL of ATC (2 mM) to initiate the reaction. After 2 min, the reaction solution was analyzed with an imark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 405 nm. The inhibition reaction was determined three times, and the inhibition rate was calculated as:
C h o l i n e s t e r a s e   I n h i b i t i o n   ( % ) = ( 1 A 1 A 2 A 0 A 2 ) × 100 %
where A1 is the absorbance value of each sample; A2 is the absorbance value of each sample without enzyme; and A0 is the absorbance value of the group without sample.

2.7. Protection of MBE against ox-LDL-Induced HUVECs Damage

2.7.1. Cell Culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Giboc, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Giboc, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin double antibody at 37°C in an incubator (Forma 3111, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 5% CO2.

2.7.2. Cytotoxicity

HUVECs in logarithmic growth phase were inoculated overnight in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 103 cells/well and were then treated with different concentrations of samples for 24 h. Six replicates were arranged for each group. Then, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution (CellorLab, Hangzhou, China) was added to each well and was incubated for 1 h in an incubator. The absorbances were measured at 450 nm with an enzyme-labeled instrument to calculate cell viability (n = 6).

2.7.3. Cell Vitality

Cell vitality was determined according to the previous method [21], with minor modifications. First, the HUVECs were inoculated overnight in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 103 cells/well and were then treated with different concentrations of samples under the exposure condition of 80 μg/mL ox-LDL (Yiyuanbiotech, Guangzhou, China) for 24 h. Then, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well and was incubated for 1 h in an incubator. Six replicates were arranged for each group. The absorbances were measured at 450 nm with an enzyme-labeled instrument to calculate cell viability (n = 6).

2.7.4. Determination of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

Intracellular ROS was determined with Dihydroethidium (DHE). HUVECs in logarithmic growth phase were first inoculated for 12 h in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well and were then treated for 24 h according to the method in Section 2.7.3. After 10 μM DHE (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was added, the reaction proceeded for 60 min at 37 °C. Then, the treated HUVECs were rinsed with a blank medium 3 times and were observed with an inverted fluorescence microscope IX73 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) under an excitation wavelength of 518 nm and an emission wavelength of 610 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. UPLC-MS/MS Fingerprints

The UPLC-MS fingerprint of MBE is shown in Figure 1. In addition to some interference signals from the fatty acids, more signals of weakly polar components in positive ion mode were acquired. More signals of moderately polar components were obtained in negative ion mode. Through signal processing, the mass spectra of 14,284 positive ions and 14,130 negative ions were obtained. The signal extraction and analysis results indicated that the main components of MBE were flavonoids and polyphenols. These components could be subdivided into stilbene, coumarin, phenylpropanoid compounds, alkaloids, and organic acids. Due to the large interference in the signals of the positive ions, the data obtained in negative ion mode are generally used in the LC-MS analysis of natural products. Therefore, in this study, besides the signals of positive ions, the signals of negative ions were mainly taken into account for data analysis. The resolved compounds are shown in Table 1 In total, 42 obvious compound signals were obtained.
Among the compounds identified by LC-MS/MS, four components, including scopolin, reported in our previous study were also found in this study. Oxyresveratrol (Oxr) is commonly found in mulberry branches, including those from Jialing 20 [15,37]. In summary, 37 new components in MBE of Jialing 20 were found, thus enriching knowledge about the chemical composition of the Jialing 20 mulberry branch.
A preliminary comparison of the mass spectral response intensity indicated that the components with higher contents in MBE might be oxyresveratrol and isoprenoid flavonoids (Kuwanon G). These compounds have also been reported to possess antibacterial [38,39] and tyrosinase inhibitory activities [40,41], suggesting that MBE might be used as antibacterial agents and whitening products.
The application of LC-MS/MS technology when studying mulberry mainly focuses on the composition analysis of mulberry leaves [42,43] and mulberry fruits [44,45], but it is seldom applied in the analysis of the main components in mulberry branches. The compounds identified by UPLC-MS/MS of MBE were quite different from the results of mulberry leaves and mulberry in references [42,43,44,45]. The rapid identification of the main components of MBE by LC-MS/MS can improve our understanding of its chemical composition and can provide theoretical guidance for the development and utilization of its chemical components.

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

Free radicals are closely related to the progression of diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, and atherosclerosis. The scavenging assay of DPPH and ABTS free radicals is a common method to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity in vitro. Figure 2 shows the ability of MBE to scavenge the free radicals DPPH and ABTS. MBE exhibited concentration-dependent DPPH free radical scavenging activity in the concentration range of 0 to 200 μg/mL. The IC50 value of MBE was 31.23 ± 0.57 μg/mL, and the IC50 value of positive Vc was 4.41 ± 0.19 μg/mL. In the concentration range of 0 to 50 μg/mL, the ability of MBE to scavenge ABTS free radicals was positively correlated with MBE concentration. The IC50 value of MBE was 8.88 ± 0.36 μg/mL, and the IC50 value of positive Vc was 8.79 ± 0.41 μg/mL. The ABTS scavenging ability of the sample was close to that of positive Vc, but the DPPH scavenging ability of the sample was different from that of positive Vc. The DPPH radical scavenging assay displayed the ability of the sample to transfer electrons or hydrogen atoms, whereas the ABTS radical scavenging assay demonstrated the hydrogen supply ability and chain-breaking ability of the sample [46]. The above results indicated that compared to Vc, MBE was more dominated by the hydrogen supply ability and chain-breaking ability rather than the ability to transfer electrons or hydrogen atoms.
The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the extracts from the same parts of different species of mulberry (Morus alba L. and Morus nigra L.) differed significantly and was positively correlated with the total content of polyphenols and flavonoids in the extracts, indicating that phenolics might be the main antioxidant components in different Morus extracts [9]. The ethanolic extracts of mulberry branches showed significant antioxidant activities, indicating that oxyresveratrol (Oxr) might be the most effective antioxidant component [47]. Oxr showed a good ability to scavenge DPPH and ABTS radicals. The possible high content of Oxr in MBE of Jialing 20 might be responsible for its better antioxidant activity.

3.3. Inhibition of α-Glucosidase Activity

As drugs for the effective control of T2DM, α-Glucosidase inhibitors have relatively few side effects because they do not need to be absorbed into the blood and can function directly in the intestine. These α-glucosidase inhibitor drugs are currently commercially available, such as acarbose and voglibose. We measured the activity of MBE in inhibiting α-glucosidase with acarbose as a positive control (Figure 3A). When the sample concentration increased from 0 to 8 μg/mL, the inhibition activity of MBE on α-glucosidase increased significantly. When the sample concentration further increased from 8 to 16 μg/mL, its inhibition ability increased slowly. When the sample concentration further increased above 16 μg/mL, its inhibition ability mostly remained stable. Its half-inhibitory concentration was 1.90 ± 0.05 μg/mL (the half-inhibitory concentration of acarbose was 0.03 μg/mL).
In the previous study on α-glucosidase inhibitory components in mulberry (Morus alba L.) with molecular docking, three types of potential small-molecule α-glucosidase inhibitory components were identified: alkaloids (1-deoxynojirimycin, DNJ), flavonols (kaempferol, quercetin and rutin), and isoprenoid flavonoids (morin, sanggenon C and kuwanon G) [48]. The LC-MS/MS results showed that DNJ and Kuwanon G in the MBE of Jialing 20 might be the material basis for its inhibition effect on α-glucosidase activity.
Since DNJ is highly polar and is difficult to retain in the C18 column, the LC-MS/MS analysis failed to separate it from other compounds. In addition, it has no UV absorption. This present study determined the DNJ content to be 0.65% in MBE with the reported FMOC-CL method [32]. The IC50 value of DNJ was 1.15 ± 0.13 μg/mL, which was similar to that of MBE. However, the content of DNJ was low, indicating that other α-glucosidase inhibitory components with stronger activity than DNJ existed in MBE. The result was consistent with previous results [32].

3.4. Inhibition of Cholinesterase Activities

Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors can slow down the hydrolysis of acetylcholine and can increase the acetylcholine (Ach) level in the synaptic cleft, thus delaying the development of symptoms in Alzheimer’s patients [49]. Cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil and galantamine have been successfully marketed as clinical agents to alleviate the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. Berberine, a natural product with cholinesterase inhibitory activity, is often used as a positive control in the determination of cholinesterase inhibitory activity of natural products [50,51,52]. In the cholinesterase inhibition assay of MBE (Figure 3B,C), both MBE and berberine showed the concentration-dependent inhibition activity of AChE and BChE, but the inhibition activity of berberine against AChE was significantly better than that against BChE, as reported in previous studies [51,53]. The inhibitory activity of MBE against BChE was significantly stronger than that against AchE. The IC50 of MBE was 101.82 ± 3.37 μg/mL (IC50 of positive berberine was 57.41 ± 0.21 μg/mL), whereas the IC50 of MBE for AChE was 179.47 ± 0.38 μg/mL (IC50 of positive berberine was 1.27 ± 0.03 μg/mL).
In the only study on the inhibition of the cholinesterase activity of MBE from Morus alba L., the IC50 values of MBE for AChE and BChE were, respectively, 46.78 ± 6.45 and 50.24 ± 3.01 μg/mL. The IC50 values of positive berberine for AChE and BChE were, respectively, 0.12 ± 0.00 and 9.45 ± 0.12 μg/mL [53]. The large difference in the IC50 values between the study and the previous report could possibly be ascribed to the differences in the reaction systems (e.g., final enzyme or substrate concentrations). However, the inhibition activities of berberine against AChE and BchE showed the similar trends. When the inhibition activities were calculated in terms of berberine equivalents, the MBE from Jialing 20 showed the significantly stronger BChE inhibitory activity than the MBE from Morus alba as well as better selectivity for BChE than AChE. Therefore, MBE might contain components with better BChE inhibitory activity.
The cholinesterase inhibitory components in mulberry branches have not been reported upon so far. Kuwanon G from mulberry roots was found to have better cholinesterase inhibitory activity, and its inhibitory activity against BChE was stronger than that against AchE [53]. UPLC-MS/MS analysis in this study showed that Kuwanon G was also contained in the MBE from Jialing 20 and might contribute to the inhibitory activity of MBE against BChE. In addition, the oxyresveratrol in MBE showed high inhibitory activity against BChE, with an IC50 value of 2.95 μM, but its inhibitory activity against AchE was low (IC50 > 400 μM) [54]. It was speculated that the inhibition activity of MBE against BchE might be ascribed to multiple components. Corresponding active ingredients and mechanism need to be further investigated.

3.5. Protection of MBE against ox-LDL-Induced HUVECs Damage

Atherosclerosis is a common cardiovascular disease, and its development process is closely related to the endothelial cell damage mechanism. ox-LDL can cause vascular endothelial cell damage and dysfunction through various pathways and can promote the development of atherosclerosis. The cytotoxicity results (Figure 4A) showed that MBE in the range of 10 to 40 μg/mL was not significantly toxic to HUVECs. Therefore, the highest concentration of MBE was subsequently selected to be 40 μg/mL in subsequent assays.
In the MBE protection assay against ox-LDL-induced HUVECs damage (Figure 4B), the activity of HUVECs exposed to ox-LDL was inhibited compared to those in the blank group. The survival rate of HUVECs exposed to 40 μg/mL MBE and ox-LDL was significantly higher than that of HUVECs exposed to ox-LDL (p < 0.01). Even 10 μg/mL MBE significantly increased the survival rate of the HUVECs (p < 0.05), indicating that MBE had a certain protective effect on ox-LDL-induced HUVECs damage. In other words, MBE has potential cardiovascular protective activity.
Reactive oxygen species can cause vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and vascular wall cell damage, which, in turn, develops into atherosclerosis. Removing excess ROS from the body may be one of the key points for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis [55]. DHE is a commonly used fluorescent detection probe for ROS since it can freely enter cells and can be dehydrogenated under the action of intracellular superoxide anions to form ethidium bromide, which can bind to DNA to produce red fluorescence under the excitation of ultraviolet rays. Within a certain range, the intracellular red fluorescence intensity indicated the concentration of superoxide anions. The red fluorescence intensity of HUVECs exposed to ox-LDL was significantly higher than that in the normal group (Figure 4D), suggesting the significantly elevated ROS level in HUVECs. In contrast, the intracellular ROS levels were significantly reduced after the HUVECs were treated with 10 μg/mL or 40 μg/mL MBE. In the processed results from Image J (Figure 4C), MBE effectively reduced the level of ROS in HUVECs under ox-LDL treatment and displayed potential preventive or therapeutic activity against atherosclerosis.
The activity of mulberry branch and its main components to protect ox-LDL-induced HUVECs damage has not been reported upon, but Kuwanon G was reported to reduce atherosclerosis by inhibiting the formation of foam cells and inflammatory response [56]. Kuwanon G might be the active component with protection against ox-LDL-induced HUVECs damage in MBE, but the active components in MBE and the corresponding mechanism remain to be further explored.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the chemical components of the MBE from Jialing 20 were analyzed and identified by UPLC-MS/MS for the first time. Then, the in vitro activities of antioxidation, α-glucosidase inhibition, cholinesterase inhibition, and protection against ox-LDL-induced HUVECs damage were determined. The MBE from Jialing 20 contained various active components such as flavonoids, polyphenols, and alkaloids, and displayed good antioxidant activity and promising applications in terms of hypoglycemic effect, Alzheimer’s disease inhibition, and cardiovascular protection. The study indicated that the MBE from Jialing 20 has potential as a food additive for the prevention of age-related diseases.

Author Contributions

W.X.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; Z.X.: project administration, software, supervision, validation, visualization; L.X.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas, Gran Number: cx2018031; Department of Agriculture: the National Sericulture Industry Technology System, Grant Number: CARS-18.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Xiaowen Shi for the help with the cell experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, S.; Wang, B.L.; Xia, X.J.; Li, X.; Wang, R.Y.; Sheng, L.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.L.; Li, Y. Simultaneous quantification of three active alkaloids from a traditional Chinese medicine Ramulus Mori (Sangzhi) in rat plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. 2015, 109, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, W.S.; Chen, H.; Xiang, Z.H.; He, N.J. Preparation of Polysaccharides from Ramulus mori, and Their Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Antibacterial Activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hwang, S.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, I.H.; Lim, Y.H. Inhibitory effect of ethanolic extract of Ramulus mori on adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells and their antioxidant activity. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Choi, S.W.; Jang, Y.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Leem, H.H.; Kim, E.O. Analysis of Functional Constituents in Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Twigs by Different Cultivars, Producing Areas, and Heat Processings. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 18, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lu, H.P.; Jia, Y.N.; Yu, Y.; Xu, L. DNA protection activity of a hydroethanol extract and six polyphenol monomers from Morus alba L. (mulberry) twig. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 2207–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, X.; Fang, J.; Ruan, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Wu, N.; Zhao, Z.; Chang, Y.; Ning, N.; Guo, H.; et al. Structures, bioactivities and future prospective of polysaccharides from Morus alba (white mulberry): A review. Food Chem. 2018, 245, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, P.; Hu, T.G.; Linhardt, R.J.; Liao, S.T.; Wu, H.; Zou, Y.X. Mulberry: A review of bioactive compounds and advanced processing technology. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2019, 83, 138–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Huang, Y. Anti-diabetic effect mediated by Ramulus mori polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Radojkovic, M.M.; Zekovic, Z.P.; Vidovic, S.S.; Kocar, D.D.; Maskovic, P.Z. Free radical scavenging activity and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of mulberry (Morus spp. L., Moraceae) extracts. Hem. Ind 2012, 66, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Shi, L. Detection of antioxidant active compounds in mori ramulus by HPLC-MS-DPPH. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2012, 37, 800–802. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gu, Y. Comparison test of new Artificial Triploid Mulberry Variety Jialing 20 in Yubei District. Newsl. Sericultural Sci. 2011, 31, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Y.H.; Huang, L.; Sun, J.H.; Wei, X.H.; Wen, J.H.; Zhong, G.P.; Huang, M.; Bi, H.C. Mulberroside A suppresses PXR-mediated transactivation and gene expression of P-gp in LS174T cells. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2017, 31, e21884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Y.Y.; Guo, H.L.; Zhao, T.T.; Fu, J.; Xu, Y.H. Mulberroside A from Cortex Mori Enhanced Gut Integrity in Diabetes. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 6655555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.F.; Jin, J.; Shi, L.G. Protective function of cis-mulberroside A and oxyresveratrol from Ramulus mori against ethanol-induced hepatic damage. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 26, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jia, Y.N.; Peng, Y.L.; Zhao, Y.P.; Cheng, X.F.; Zhou, Y.; Chai, C.L.; Zeng, L.S.; Pan, M.H.; Xu, L. Comparison of the Hepatoprotective Effects of the Three Main Stilbenes from Mulberry Twigs. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5521–5529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Belikov, A.V. Age-related diseases as vicious cycles. Ageing Res. Rev. 2019, 49, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Wu, D.; Yu, Y.; Hu, N.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Wu, Y. Emerging strategies for the activity assay and inhibitor screening of alpha-glucosidase. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. He, X.F.; Chen, J.J.; Li, T.Z.; Zhang, X.K.; Guo, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.M.; Hu, J.; Geng, C.A. Nineteen New Flavanol-Fatty Alcohol Hybrids with alpha-Glucosidase and PTP1B Dual Inhibition: One Unusual Type of Antidiabetic Constituent from Amomum tsao-ko. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 11434–11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alghamdi, S.; Asif, M. Role of pyridazine analogs as acetylcholinesterase inhibitor: An approach for management of alzheimer’s disease. Eurasian Chem. Commun. 2021, 3, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mella, M.; Moraga-Nicolas, F.; Machuca, J.; Quiroz, A.; Mutis, A.; Becerra, J.; Astudillo, A.; Hormazabal, E. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity from Amaryllis belladonna growing in Chile: Enzymatic and molecular docking studies. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, H.; Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Suo, R.; Lu, C. Naringin protects endothelial cells from apoptosis and inflammation by regulating the Hippo-YAP Pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20193431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhao, J.; Niu, X.; Yu, J.; Xiao, X.; Li, W.; Zang, L.; Hu, Z.; Siu-Po Ip, P.; Li, W. Poria cocos polysaccharides attenuated ox-LDL-induced inflammation and oxidative stress via ERK activated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway and inhibited foam cell formation in VSMCs. Int. Immunopharmacol 2020, 80, 106173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, X. Astragaloside IV Protects Against Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein (ox-LDL)-Induced Endothelial Cell Injury by Reducing Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 2132–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Marengoni, A.; Angleman, S.; Melis, R.; Mangialasche, F.; Karp, A.; Garmen, A.; Meinow, B.; Fratiglioni, L. Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. A Ageing Res. Rev. 2011, 10, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Butterfield, D.A.; Di Domenico, F.; Barone, E. Elevated risk of type 2 diabetes for development of Alzheimer disease: A key role for oxidative stress in brain. Biochim. Biophys Acta 2014, 1842, 1693–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Baunthiyal, M.; Singh, V.; Dwivedi, S. Insights of Antioxidants as Molecules for Drug Discovery. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 13, 874–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tiwari, A.K. Antioxidants: New-generation therapeutic base for treatment of polygenic disorders. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 1092–1102. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gendel, S.M. Potential functional food ingredients: Insufficient ingredient descriptions. J. Funct Foods 2021, 86, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, P.; Bajpai, V.; Gupta, A.; Gaikwad, A.N.; Maurya, R.; Kumar, B. Identification and quantification of secondary metabolites of Pterocarpus marsupium by LC-MS techniques and its in-vitro lipid lowering activity. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 127, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peixoto, C.M.; Dias, M.I.; Alves, M.J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Pinho, S.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Grape pomace as a source of phenolic compounds and diverse bioactive properties. Food Chem. 2018, 253, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.P.; Jiang, L.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, D.J.; Xu, L. Interrelation of cholesterol-lowering, antioxidant activity and DNA damage protection to the different solvent extracts of mulberry (Morus alba L.). J. Food Process. Pres. 2020, 45, e14891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, C.; Xiang, W.; Yu, Y.; Shi, Z.-Q.; Huang, X.-Z.; Xu, L. Comparative analysis of 1-deoxynojirimycin contribution degree to α-glucosidase inhibitory activity and physiological distribution in Morus alba L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 70, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.L.; Fu, T.M.; Li, W.; Xu, X.L.; Sun, H.P. Discovery of new acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with small core structures through shape-based virtual screening. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 3442–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Abbas, G.M.; Bar, F.M.A.; Baraka, H.N.; Gohar, A.A.; Lahloub, M.F. A new antioxidant stilbene and other constituents from the stem bark of Morus nigra L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aelenei, P.; Luca, S.V.; Horhogea, C.E.; Rimbu, C.M.; Dimitriu, G.; Macovei, I.; Silion, M.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Miron, A. Morus alba leaf extract: Metabolite profiling and interactions with antibiotics against Staphylococcus spp. including MRSA. Phytochem. Lett. 2019, 31, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, J.; Mu, Y.; Xiong, S.; Sun, P.; Deng, Z. A UPLC-MS/MS method for comparative pharmacokinetics study of morusin and morin in normal and diabetic rats. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2019, 33, e4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, L.; Liu, C.; Xiang, W.; Chen, H.; Qin, X.L.; Huang, X.Z. Advances in the Study of Oxyresveratrol. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 10, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, S.C.; Han, F.; Song, M.R.; Chen, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, K.; Shen, J.Z. Natural Flavones from Morus alba against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus via Targeting the Proton Motive Force and Membrane Permeability. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10222–10234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mascarello, A.; Menegatti, A.C.O.; Calcaterra, A.; Martins, P.G.A.; Chiaradia-Delatorre, L.D.; D’Acquarica, I.; Ferrari, F.; Pau, V.; Sanna, A.; De Logu, A.; et al. Naturally occurring Diels-Alder-type adducts from Morus nigra as potent inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 144, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chaita, E.; Lambrinidis, G.; Cheimonidi, C.; Agalou, A.; Beis, D.; Trougakos, I.; Mikros, E.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Aligiannis, N. Anti-Melanogenic Properties of Greek Plants. A Novel Depigmenting Agent from Morus alba Wood. Molecules 2017, 22, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Likhitwitayawuid, K. Oxyresveratrol: Sources, Productions, Biological Activities, Pharmacokinetics, and Delivery Systems. Molecules 2021, 26, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nastic, N.; Borras-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sanchez, J.; Svarc-Gajic, J.; Segura-Carretero, A. Optimization of the extraction of phytochemicals from black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) leaves. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 68, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sanchez-Salcedo, E.M.; Tassotti, M.; Del Rio, D.; Hernandez, F.; Martinez, J.J.; Mena, P. (Poly)phenolic fingerprint and chemometric analysis of white (Morus alba L.) and black (Morus nigra L.) mulberry leaves by using a non-targeted UHPLC-MS approach. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, J.; Ou, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Ma, L. Effect of Different Solvents on the Measurement of Phenolics and the Antioxidant Activity of Mulberry (Morus atropurpurea Roxb.) with Accelerated Solvent Extraction. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jin, Q.; Yang, J.F.; Ma, L.Y.; Wen, D.W.; Chen, F.; Li, J.M. Identification of polyphenols in mulberry (genus Morus) cultivars by liquid chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 63, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perez-Jimenez, J.; Arranz, S.; Tabernero, M.; Diaz-Rubio, M.E.; Serrano, J.; Goni, I.; Saura-Calixto, F. Updated methodology to determine antioxidant capacity in plant foods, oils and beverages: Extraction, measurement and expression of. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Z.F.; Jin, J.; Shi, L.G. Antioxidant Properties of Ethanolic Extract from Ramulus mori (Sangzhi). Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2009, 15, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Z.Y.; Du, X.; Yang, Y.Y.; Cui, X.M.; Zhang, Z.J.; Li, Y. Comparative study of chemical composition and active components against alpha-glucosidase of various medicinal parts of Morus alba L. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bond, M.; Rogers, G.; Peters, J.; Anderson, R.; Hoyle, M.; Miners, A.; Moxham, T.; Davis, S.; Thokala, P.; Wailoo, A.; et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (review of Technology Appraisal No. 111): A systematic review and economic model. Health Technol. Assess. 2012, 16, 1–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, T.Q.; Ngo, Q.M.T.; Seong, S.H.; Youn, U.J.; Kim, J.A.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.C.; Woo, M.H.; Choi, J.S.; Min, B.S. Cholinesterase inhibitory alkaloids from the rhizomes of Coptis chinensis. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 77, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Can, M.V.; Tran, A.H.; Pham, D.M.; Dinh, B.Q.; Le, Q.V.; Nguyen, B.V.; Nguyen, M.T.T.; Nguyen, H.X.; Nguyen, N.T.; Nishijo, H. Willughbeia cochinchinensis prevents scopolamine-induced deficits in memory, spatial learning, and object recognition in rodents. J. Ethnopharmacol 2018, 214, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yuan, N.N.; Cai, C.Z.; Wu, M.Y.; Su, H.X.; Li, M.; Lu, J.H. Neuroprotective effects of berberine in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of pre-clinical studies. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kuk, E.B.; Jo, A.R.; Oh, S.I.; Sohn, H.S.; Seong, S.H.; Roy, A.; Choi, J.S.; Jung, H.A. Anti-Alzheimer’s disease activity of compounds from the root bark of Morus alba L. Arch. Pharm Res. 2017, 40, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Namdaung, U.; Athipornchai, A.; Khammee, T.; Kuno, M.; Suksamrarn, S. 2-Arylbenzofurans from Artocarpus lakoocha and methyl ether analogs with potent cholinesterase inhibitory activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2018, 143, 1301–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Profumo, E.; Buttari, B.; D’Arcangelo, D.; Tinaburri, L.; Dettori, M.A.; Fabbri, D.; Delogu, G.; Rigano, R. The Nutraceutical Dehydrozingerone and Its Dimer Counteract Inflammation- and Oxidative Stress-Induced Dysfunction of In Vitro Cultured Human Endothelial Cells: A Novel Perspective for the Prevention and Therapy of Atherosclerosis. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 2016, 1246485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, X.X.; Zhang, X.W.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.Y.; Ma, W.L.; Cao, W.; Mo, D.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.Q. Kuwanon G attenuates atherosclerosis by upregulation of LXR alpha-ABCA1/ABCG1 and inhibition of NF kappa B activity in macrophages. Toxicol Appl. Pharm 2018, 341, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Total ion chromatogram of UPLC-MS of MBE. (A), Positive; (B), Negative.
Figure 1. Total ion chromatogram of UPLC-MS of MBE. (A), Positive; (B), Negative.
Foods 10 02659 g001
Figure 2. Free radical scavenging activities of MBE. (A), DPPH radical; (B), ABTS radical.
Figure 2. Free radical scavenging activities of MBE. (A), DPPH radical; (B), ABTS radical.
Foods 10 02659 g002
Figure 3. Enzyme inhibitory activity of MBE. (A), α-glucosidase; (B), AChE; (C), BChE.
Figure 3. Enzyme inhibitory activity of MBE. (A), α-glucosidase; (B), AChE; (C), BChE.
Foods 10 02659 g003
Figure 4. MBE ameliorated ox-LDL-induced damage in HUVECs. (A), Effect of MBE on the survival rate of HUVECs; (B), effect of MBE on the survival rate of ox-LDL-induced HUVECs; (C), relative content of ROS; (D), DHE staining of ROS. ** p < 0.01, versus control group; *** p < 0.001, versus control group; # p < 0.05, versus ox-LDL group; ## p < 0.01, versus ox-LDL group.
Figure 4. MBE ameliorated ox-LDL-induced damage in HUVECs. (A), Effect of MBE on the survival rate of HUVECs; (B), effect of MBE on the survival rate of ox-LDL-induced HUVECs; (C), relative content of ROS; (D), DHE staining of ROS. ** p < 0.01, versus control group; *** p < 0.001, versus control group; # p < 0.05, versus ox-LDL group; ## p < 0.01, versus ox-LDL group.
Foods 10 02659 g004
Table 1. Tentatively identified compounds from Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis) mulberry branch by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Table 1. Tentatively identified compounds from Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis) mulberry branch by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
No.RTFormulam/zMS/MSNameAdductsMass Error (ppm)Raw AbundanceFragmentation ScoreReference
10.57C6H13NO4164.0916 80.0493, 69.0331,
146.0814
1-DeoxynojirimycinM+H−0.67546.6092.3 TCM
21.93C16H18O9353.0880 191.0559, 179.0355Neochlorogenic acidM−H0.47216.7382.3 TCM
32.21C15H16O9339.0718 177.0190, 133.0290EsculinM−H−1.044822.1985.2 TCM
C15H16O9341.0865 179.0331, 133.0274M+H−1.061025.2190.6 TCM
42.49C26H32O14567.1732 243.0663, 405.1193Mulberroside AM−H0.319166.1593.0 TCM
C26H32O14569.1839 245.0798, 227.0692,
407.1312
M+H−4.48252.7980.5 TCM
52.68C16H18O9353.0879 191.0575 Chlorogenic acidM−H0.14850.3194.5 TCM
62.8C15H16O8325.0916 163.0384 SkimminM+H−0.7558.2599.7 TCM
72.85C16H18O9399.0928 191.0351, 176.0112,148.0174ScopolinM+FA−H−1.29722.2194.0 TCM
C16H18O9355.1014 193.0491, 133.0272,
178.0245
M+H−2.57167.7294.5 TCM
82.94C9H6O4177.0196 133.0287, 149.02407,8-DihydroxycoumarinM−H1.36310.7086.8 TCM
92.97C7H6O4153.0193 67.0188, 109.0303,
65.0398
2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acidM−H0.01453.7499.2 TCM
104.08C9H8O3163.0401 119.0502, 93.0345,
117.0332
2-Hydroxycinnamic acidM−H−0.09101.5294.1 TCM
114.44C9H6O3161.0243 133.0295 7-HydroxycoumarinM−H−0.97284.9877.0 TCM
C9H6O3163.0391 77.0389, 107.0513M+H1.0642.8088.6 TCM
124.65C10H8O4191.0350 176.0117, 148.01726-Hydroxy-7-methoxycoumarinM−H0.17218.2282.7 TCM
134.66C10H8O4193.0502 178.0268, 133.0294,
150.0320
ScopoletinM+H1.70646.4078.7 TCM
144.83C20H22O8435.1292 227.0709, 185.0603,
389.1201
PolydatinM+FA−H−1.1871.6070.8 TCM
155.08C15H12O7303.0507 125.0241, 177.0193,
217.0508
3,5,7,3′,4′-PentahydroxyflavanoneM−H−1.018497.4367.9 TCM
C15H12O7305.0659 153.0176, 123.0435M+H−0.95847.0477.0 TCM
165.14C21H20O12463.0869 301.0356, 151.0052SpiraeosideM−H−2.78180.2889.9 TCM
175.16C21H20O12465.1012 303.0495, 257.0413HyperosideM+H−3.2991.8182.1 TCM
185.54C14H12O4243.0662 175.0760, 159.0448,
199.0762
OxyresveratrolM−H−0.4441,040.2093.0 TCM
C14H12O4245.0811 107.0486, 161.0588,
181.0642
M+H−0.1912,078.7481.1 TCM
195.94C21H22O10433.1139 271.0621, 119.0513,
365.0850
Naringenin-7-O-glucosideM−H−0.2630.8674.3 TCM
205.94C21H20O11447.0929 285.0400, 257.0459Kaempferol-7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside M−H−0.89171.0575.5 TCM
216.36C14H12O4243.0664 159.0458, 201.0558PiceatannolM−H0.55324.4675.6 TCM
227.12C15H10O6285.0404 151.0048, 241.0509,
267.0360
LuteolinM−H−0.04245.5567.2 TCM
237.18C10H18O4201.1139 139.1137, 183.1048Sebacic acidM−H3.2127.2195.5 TCM
247.27C10H10O3177.0561 117.0350, 145.0304Methyl 4-hydroxycinnamateM−H2.3019.3778.2 TCM
257.33C14H12O3273.0770 227.0720, 185.0611,
209.0604
ResveratrolM+FA−H0.8631.5189.4 TCM
2610.68C40H36O11693.2291 137.0227, 203.0701,
365.1010
Kuwanon GM+H−4.775434.0868.5 TCM
C40H36O11691.2192 581.1812, 353.1023M−H0.9810,494.4290.2 TCM
2711.06C18H34O4313.2385 183.1371, 295.228312,13-Dihydroxy-9Z-octadecenoic acidM−H0.2958.3592.7 TCM
2811.13C25H26O6421.1635 299.1276, 309.0390MulberrinM−H0.1716,531.24-[34]
2911.32C18H39NO3318.2998 60.0440, 300.2894PhytosphingosineM+H, M+Na−2.45999.0086.8 TCM
3011.46C45H44O11759.2827581.1841, 353.1017Kuwanon HM−H0.283452.38-[35]
3112.15C15H12O191.0854 165.0040 ChalconeM+H−H2O−0.81128.3084.2 TCM
3212.41C18H32O3295.2277 277.2154, 183.14099(10)-Epoxy-12Z-octadecenoic acidM−H−0.552353.7377.5 TCM
3312.73C25H24O6419.1494 297.1126, 309.1122,
217.0504, 350.0788
MorusinM−H0.1513,245.32-[36]
3413.94C21H36O4353.2674 261.2201 Monolinolenin (9c,12c,15c)M+H−3.151235.9391.6 TCM
3514.9C21H38O4355.2844 263.2374, 245.2272,
337.2738
1-Monolinoleoyl-rac-glycerolM+H−1.281494.6787.9 TCM
3614.91C16H32O3271.2278 225.2246 2-Hydroxypalmitic acidM−H−0.13169.5282.8 TCM
3715.47C19H38O4331.2840 57.0695, 313.2730,
239.2370
1-PalmitoylglycerolM+H−0.72183.9296.5 TCM
3815.69C18H32O2325.2373 279.2323 Linoleic acidM+FA−H−3.96147.7282.8 TCM
3915.7C18H32O2281.2474 55.0544, 69.0701,
83.0856, 97.1007
10E,12Z-Octadecadienoic acidM+H−0.551828.1981.1 TCM
4017.15C18H34O267.2676 67.0545, 81.0685,
95.0854, 109.0993
cis,cis-9,12-Octadecadien-1-olM+H−2.38163.0284.2 TCM
4117.5C19H36O3295.2624 263.2372, 245.2260,
55.0551, 69.0706,
81.0700, 95.0867,
Ricinoleic acid methyl esterM+H−H2O−2.48378.4793.0 TCM
4218.78C29H50O397.3830 147.1182, 161.1323β-SitosterolM+H−H2O0.31792.1777.3 TCM
RT: retention time; RA: raw abundance; FA: formic acid, HCOOH. M+H, M+H−H2O, and M+Na are adduct ions in positive mode; M−H and M+FA−H are adduct ions in negative mode; - means the fragment is not compared with the TCM database; TCM is TCM_2.0_MSMS Library (AB Sciex).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiang, W.; Xia, Z.; Xu, L. UPLC-MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory, Cholinesterase Inhibitory, and Cardiovascular Protection Potentials of Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis Perr.) Mulberry Branch Extract. Foods 2021, 10, 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112659

AMA Style

Xiang W, Xia Z, Xu L. UPLC-MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory, Cholinesterase Inhibitory, and Cardiovascular Protection Potentials of Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis Perr.) Mulberry Branch Extract. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiang, Wei, Zhining Xia, and Li Xu. 2021. "UPLC-MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory, Cholinesterase Inhibitory, and Cardiovascular Protection Potentials of Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis Perr.) Mulberry Branch Extract" Foods 10, no. 11: 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112659

APA Style

Xiang, W., Xia, Z., & Xu, L. (2021). UPLC-MS/MS Profiling, Antioxidant, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory, Cholinesterase Inhibitory, and Cardiovascular Protection Potentials of Jialing 20 (Morus multicaulis Perr.) Mulberry Branch Extract. Foods, 10(11), 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop