Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Questionnaire
2.3. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Sample Characteristics and Behaviors
3.2. The Factors Explain Preferences of Respondents
3.3. Cluster Analysis: Potential Consumer Profiling
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Çakiroǧlu, F.P.; Uçar, A. Consumer attitudes towards purchasing functional products. Prog. Nutr. 2018, 20, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, S. Functional foods: The Food and Drug Administration perspective. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1735S–1738S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Troszyńska, A.; Estrella, I.; López-Amóres, M.L.; Hernández, T. Antioxidant activity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed coat acetone extract. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 35, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuda, A.; Kuraya, E.; Touyama, A.; Higa, O.; Hokamoto, K.; Itoh, S. Underwater shockwave pretreatment process for improving carotenoid content and yield of extracted carrot (Daucus carota L.) Juice. J. Food Eng. 2017, 211, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilić, J.D.; Nikolovski, B.G.; Petrović, L.B.; Kojić, P.S.; Lončarević, I.S.; Petrović, J.S. The garlic (A. sativum L.) extracts food grade W1/O/W2 emulsions prepared by homogenization and stirred cell membrane emulsification. J. Food Eng. 2017, 205, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laiño, J.E.; Juarez del Valle, M.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Development of a high folate concentration yogurt naturally bio-enriched using selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Scalia, G.; Micale, R.; Cannizzaro, L.; Marra, F.P. A sustainable phenolic compound extraction system from olive oil mill wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 3782–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perito, M.A.; Di Fonzo, A.; Sansone, M.; Russo, C. Consumer acceptance of food obtained from olive by-products: A survey of Italian consumers. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Grunert, K.G. The perceived healthiness of functional foods: A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers’ perception of functional foods. Appetite 2003, 40, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frewer, L.; Scholderer, J.; Lambert, N. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Issues for the future. Br. Food J. 2003, 105, 714–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saher, M.; Arvola, A.; Lindeman, M.; Lähteenmäki, L. Impressions of functional food consumers. Appetite 2004, 42, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutr. Food Sci. 2003, 33, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Enea, M.; La Scalia, G. Economic assessment based on scenario analysis for the production of a new functional pasta. J. Food Eng. 2018, 237, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasler, C.M.; Brown, A.C. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Functional foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 735–746. [Google Scholar]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Scholderer, J. Functional foods in Europe: Consumer research, market experiences and regulatory aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahl, J.; Załęcka, A.; Ploeger, A.; Bügel, S.; Huber, M. Functional food and organic food are competing rather than supporting concepts in europe. Agriculture. 2012, 2, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Menrad, K. Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J. Food Eng. 2003, 56, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias-Aranda, D.; Romerosa-Martínez, M.M. Innovation in the functional foods industry in a peripheral region of the European Union: Andalusia (Spain). Food Policy 2010, 35, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oniszczuk, A.; Wójtowicz, A.; Oniszczuk, T.; Matwijczuk, A.; Dib, A.; Markut-Miotła, E. Opuntia fruits as food enriching ingredient, the first step towards new functional food products. Molecules 2020, 25, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Décordé, K.; Teissèdre, P.; Auger, C.; Cristol, J.; Rouanet, J. Phenolics from purple grape, apple, purple grape juice and apple juice prevent early atherosclerosis induced by an atherogenic diet in hamsters. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galati, E.M.; Tripodo, M.M.; Trovato, A.; d’Aquino, A.; Monforte, M.T. Biological activity of Opuntia ficus indica cladodes II: Effect on experimental hypercholesterolemia in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El-Mostafa, K.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andreu-Coll, L.; Cano-Lamadrid, M.; Noguera-Artiaga, L.; Lipan, L.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Rocamora-Montiel, B.; Legua, P.; Hernández, F.; López-Lluch, D. Economic estimation of cactus pear production and its feasibility in Spain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, C.M.G.; Gazarini, L.C.; Ribeiro, M.M. Fruit production from Opuntia ficus-indica ecotypes in comparison to commercial Italian clones. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 45, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albano, C.; Negro, C.; Tommasi, N.; Gerardi, C.; Mita, G.; Miceli, A.; De Bellis, L.; Blando, F. Betalains, phenols and antioxidant capacity in cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] fruits from Apulia (South Italy) genotypes. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, R.; De Ita, A.; Vaca, M. Drying of prickly pear cactus cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica) in a forced convection tunnel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouazizi, S.; Montevecchi, G.; Antonelli, A.; Hamdi, M. Effects of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) peel flour as an innovative ingredient in biscuits formulation. LWT 2020, 124, 109155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Russo, G.; La Scalia, G. Selection of a sustainable functional pasta enriched with Opuntia using ELECTRE III methodology. Sustainability 2017, 9, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aiello, A.; Di Bona, D.; Candore, G.; Carru, C.; Zinellu, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Nicosia, A.; Gambino, C.M.; Ruisi, P.; Caruso, C. Targeting aging with functional food: Pasta with Opuntia single-arm pilot study. Rejuvenation Res. 2018, 21, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altamore, L.; Bacarella, S.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S. The Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta: Does Environment Matter? Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 58, 859–864. [Google Scholar]
- Defrancesco, E.; Perito, M.A.; Bozzolan, I.; Cei, L.; Stefani, G. Testing consumers’ preferences for environmental attributes of pasta. Insights from an ABR approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Altamore, L.; Ingrassia, M.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S. Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta and Consumption Trends: Tradition or Innovation? J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2019, 32, 337–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Simeone, M.; Russo, C.; Angela, M. Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: A case study on Italian undergraduate students. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 21, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Lupi, C. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: Some hints from Italy. Br. Food, J. 2020, 123, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Macrì, M.C.; Lupi, C. Exploring consumers’ willingness to eat insects in Italy. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2937–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Forleo, M.B. The potential of edible seaweed within the western diet. A segmentation of Italian consumers. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 20, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Latterini, F.; Pari, L. The eucalyptus firewood: Understanding consumers’ behaviour and motivations. Agriculture 2020, 10, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Pari, L. Italian consumers’ willingness to pay for eucalyptus firewood. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A. Consumers’ Willingness to Consume Sustainable and Local Wine in Italy. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 222–233. [Google Scholar]
- Palmieri, N.; Pesce, A.; Verrascina, M. Market Opportunities for Hay Milk: Factors Influencing Perceptions among Italian Consumers. Animals 2021, 11, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 39, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S.; Altamore, L.; Columba, P.; Ingrassia, M. Study of product repositioning for the Marsala Vergine DOC wine. Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus. 2017, 32, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaur, A.S.; Gaur, S.S. Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS; Sage: New Delhi, India, 2006; ISBN 0761935029. [Google Scholar]
- De Lillo, A. Analisi Multivariata per le Scienze Sociali; Pearson Italia Spa: Milano, Italy, 2007; ISBN 8871923766. [Google Scholar]
- Team, R.C. Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Arsham, H.; Lovric, M. Bartlett’s Test; Miodrag Lovric; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Macdiarmid, J.I. Seasonality and dietary requirements: Will eating seasonal food contribute to health and environmental sustainability? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2014, 73, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coderoni, S.; Perito, M.A.; Cardillo, C. Consumer behaviour in Italy. Who spends more to buy a Mediterranean Diet? New Medit 2017, 16, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
- ISTAT Statbase: L’accesso ai Principali Dati. Available online: www.istat.it (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Conto, F.; Antonazzo, A.P.; Conte, A.; Cafarelli, B. Consumers perception of traditional sustainable food: An exploratory study on pasta made from native ancient durum wheat varieties. Ital. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2016, 71, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
- Ellison, B.; Brooks, K.; Mieno, T. Which livestock production claims matter most to consumers? Agric. Hum. Values 2017, 34, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darby, M.R.; Karni, E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econ. 1973, 16, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Childs, N.M. Foods that help prevent disease: Consumer attitudes and public policy implications. J. Consum. Mark. 1997, 14, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annunziata, A.; Vecchio, R. Functional foods development in the European market: A consumer perspective. J. Funct. Foods 2011, 3, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grahl, S.; Strack, M.; Mensching, A.; Mörlein, D. Alternative protein sources in Western diets: Food product development and consumer acceptance of spirulina-filled pasta. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 84, 103933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sessa L Il Giornale del Cibo Conoscere, Scoprire, Gustare. Available online: https://www.ilgiornaledelcibo.it/fico-d-india-ricette-piatti/ (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Giraitalia Sagre in Italia. Available online: https://www.giraitalia.it/sagre/ (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Van Trijp, J.C.M.; Steenkamp, J. Consumer-oriented new product development: Principles and practice. Innov. Agri Food Syst. 2005, 87–124. [Google Scholar]
- De Albuquerque, J.G.; de Souza Aquino, J.; de Albuquerque, J.G.; de Farias, T.G.S.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B.; Bosquez-Molina, E.; Azoubel, P.M. Consumer perception and use of nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica): A cross-cultural study between Mexico and Brazil. Food Res. Int. 2019, 124, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | % |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 38.60 |
Female | 61.40 |
Total | 100.00 |
Education | |
Low education | 11.40 |
High education | 88.60 |
Total | 100.00 |
Status | |
Unmarried | 23.68 |
Married | 64.47 |
Separated/divorced | 11.85 |
Total | 100.00 |
Annual income (Euros) | |
<10,000 | 4.39 |
10,001–20,000 | 13.60 |
20,001–30,000 | 35.08 |
30,001–40,000 | 28.07 |
40,001–50,000 | 11.84 |
>50,001 | 7.02 |
Total | 100.00 |
Variables | % |
---|---|
Frequency of consumption | |
never | 2.19 |
Once a month | 5.26 |
Once a week | 14.91 |
Twice a week | 20.18 |
More than twice a week | 35.08 |
Every day | 22.38 |
Total | 100.00 |
Places of consumption | |
At home | 58.77 |
Out of home (bars and restaurants) | 2.19 |
Both | 39.04 |
Total | 100.00 |
Frequency of Consumption | Integral Pasta | Fresh Pasta | Organic Pasta | Stuffed Pasta | Egg Pasta | Frozen Pasta Cooked | Pasta Cooked | Pasta with Added Vitamins | Kamut® Wheat Pasta |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Never | 35.96 | 13.60 | 64.03 | 25.88 | 18.42 | 89.91 | 90.79 | 94.74 | 81.58 |
Once a month | 32.89 | 55.26 | 21.93 | 57.46 | 54.82 | 8.33 | 7.02 | 2.63 | 14.03 |
Once a week | 17.54 | 28.95 | 7.01 | 15.35 | 25.00 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 2.19 | 3.07 |
Twice a week | 6.14 | 1.75 | 2.19 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.44 | 0.88 |
More than twice a week | 3.95 | 0.44 | 3.51 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
Every day | 3.52 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 10.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Variables | % |
---|---|
I do not know | 16.22 |
Wheat cultivated only in Italy | 53.96 |
Wheat cultivated only in Southern Italy | 8.33 |
Wheat cultivated abroad | 0.00 |
Wheat cultivated both in Italy and abroad | 21.49 |
Total | 100.00 |
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | Factor 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health aspects (α = 0.95) ** | |||||||
Health effects | 0.87 | ||||||
Proteic | 0.78 | ||||||
Caloric | 0.86 | ||||||
Fat | 0.84 | ||||||
Hygienic | 0.84 | ||||||
Geographic | 0.76 | ||||||
Seasons | 0.77 | ||||||
Traditions | 0.69 | ||||||
Environmental impact | 0.80 | ||||||
Social impact | 0.77 | ||||||
Production method | 0.76 | ||||||
Food neophobia (α = 0.99) ** | |||||||
New * | 0.72 | ||||||
Different culture * | 0.95 | ||||||
New food * | 0.78 | ||||||
Ethnic restaurant * | 0.82 | ||||||
Food technology neophobia (α = 0.76) ** | |||||||
No technology | 0.74 | ||||||
Environmental benefits overestimated | 0.88 | ||||||
World hunger overestimated | 0.87 | ||||||
Low quality | 0.77 | ||||||
Good enough | 0.75 | ||||||
Unknown effect on health | 0.56 | ||||||
Type of pasta (α = 0.75) ** | |||||||
Fresh pasta | 0.57 | ||||||
Stuffed pasta | 0.66 | ||||||
Egg pasta | 0.62 | ||||||
Italian pasta tradition (α = 0.91) ** | |||||||
Origin as quality indicator | 0.64 | ||||||
Italian wheat | 0.69 | ||||||
Southern Italy wheat | 0.52 | ||||||
Recycled packaging | 0.60 | ||||||
Info health benefits | 0.75 | ||||||
Info production | 0.82 | ||||||
Territorial brand | 0.80 | ||||||
Low impact | 0.86 | ||||||
Quality certification | 0.85 | ||||||
Health certification | 0.83 | ||||||
Ethical certification | 0.81 | ||||||
Attributes of pasta (α = 0.91) ** | |||||||
Method | 0.73 | ||||||
Type | 0.73 | ||||||
Origin | 0.80 | ||||||
Pasta brand | 0.73 | ||||||
Labeled nutrition | 0.82 | ||||||
Color | 0.68 | ||||||
Time | 0.67 | ||||||
Cooking method | 0.63 | ||||||
Quality certification | 0.77 | ||||||
Price | 0.48 | ||||||
Functional pasta (α = 0.87) ** | |||||||
Curiosity | 0.74 | ||||||
Health benefits | 0.86 | ||||||
More nutrients | 0.81 | ||||||
Low environmental impact | 0.89 | ||||||
Low cost | 0.58 | ||||||
Pasta factory | 0.62 | ||||||
More info | 0.83 |
n | Label of Consumers Profiles | % | Edu | Food Consumption Attitudes | Pasta Consumption Attitudes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health Aspects | Food Neophobia | Food Technology Neophobia | Type of Pasta | Italian Pasta Tradition | Attributes of Pasta | Functional Pasta | ||||
1 | Healthy and traditional consumer | 7.71 | 0.74 | 7.36 | 4.55 | 4.09 | 1.10 | 7.36 | 6.83 | 5.80 |
2 | Refractory consumer | 5.56 | 0.58 | 5.29 | 3.15 | 2.20 | 1.07 | 3.89 | 4.87 | 5.55 |
3 | Neophobic and traditional consumer | 4.75 | 0.51 | 2.29 | 6.86 | 3.18 | 1.35 | 7.14 | 7.34 | 6.31 |
4 | Healthy, technophobic, and traditional consumer | 43.23 | 0.60 | 8.39 | 4.59 | 6.51 | 1.10 | 8.70 | 8.34 | 7.33 |
5 | Healthy and expert consumer | 28.10 | 0.94 | 8.73 | 5.62 | 6.03 | 0.44 | 3.16 | 9.38 | 8.02 |
6 | Neophobic and critical consumer | 3.64 | 0.11 | 4,23 | 8.28 | 5.43 | 0.71 | 3.87 | 5.67 | 3.14 |
7 | Neophobic consumer | 7.01 | 0.28 | 2.84 | 8.73 | 3.08 | 1.10 | 2.71 | 2.34 | 2.29 |
The whole sample | 100.00 | 0.90 | 6.58 | 5.17 | 4.41 | 1.07 | 6.67 | 6.68 | 6.77 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Stefanoni, W.; Pari, L. Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods 2021, 10, 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
Palmieri N, Suardi A, Stefanoni W, Pari L. Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods. 2021; 10(4):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
Chicago/Turabian StylePalmieri, Nadia, Alessandro Suardi, Walter Stefanoni, and Luigi Pari. 2021. "Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy" Foods 10, no. 4: 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
APA StylePalmieri, N., Suardi, A., Stefanoni, W., & Pari, L. (2021). Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods, 10(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803