Next Article in Journal
Effects of Microbial Communities on Volatile Profiles and Biogenic Amines in Beef Jerky from Inner Mongolian Districts
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes in Caprine Milk Fat Globule Membrane Proteins after Heat Treatment Using a Label-Free Proteomics Technique
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploratory Study on the Relation between Companies’ Food Integrity Climate and Employees’ Food Integrity Behavior in Food Businesses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soybean-Oil-Body-Substituted Low-Fat Ice Cream with Different Homogenization Pressure, Pasteurization Condition, and Process Sequence: Physicochemical Properties, Texture, and Storage Stability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution of Volatile Compounds during Ripening and Final Sensory Changes of Traditional Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese “Torta del Casar” Maturated with Selected Protective Lactic Acid Bacteria

1
Higiene y Seguridad Alimentaria, Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Carne y Productos Cárnicos (IProCar), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de las Ciencias, s/n., 10003 Cáceres, Spain
2
Tecnología y Calidad de Alimentos, Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Carne y Productos Cárnicos (IProCar), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda. de las Ciencias, s/n., 10003 Cáceres, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(17), 2658; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172658
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 25 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022

Abstract

:
In traditional soft ripened cheeses made with raw milk, the use of protective cultures is infrequent. In the present work, the effect of selected (for their activity against Listeria monocytogenes) protective cultures of Lactocaseibacillus casei 116 and Lactococcus garvieae 151 was evaluated, on the evolution of volatile compounds throughout the ripening and on the final sensory characteristics of traditional soft ripened “Torta del Casar” cheese. For this, both strains were separately inoculated in raw cheeses and ripened for 90 days. The selected LAB strains did not affect physicochemical parameters, including texture and color of the ripened cheeses. However, they could have a positive effect on the aroma, for the generation of methyl branched acids and for the reduction in compounds derived from β-oxidation of fatty acids. Thus, these protective cultures, in addition to contributing to their safety, could improve quality of the ripened cheeses.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

“Torta del Casar” is a high-quality Spanish cheese marketed under the Registry of the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) “Torta del Casar” (Casar de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain) in accordance with Regulation (CE) 1491/2003 [1] of the European Commission. This type of cheese is made from whole raw Merino ewe’s milk using only the dried flowers of the plant Cynara cardunculus as rennet. In this kind of cheese, the content of protein and lipid is around 21% and 29%, respectively [2]. The absence of any standardizing thermal process leads to the presence of undesirable microorganisms throughout ripening [3]. In recent decades soft cheeses such as “Torta del Casar” have been linked to many outbreaks of illnesses in Europe and worldwide [4,5]. Due to its ubiquity and ability to survive and even grow at refrigeration temperatures, most of the outbreaks related to the consumption of soft cheeses have been caused by Listeria monocytogenes [6,7].
The use of bioprotective cultures represents an additional hurdle to avoid L. monocytogenes proliferation and persistence in these products [5,8]. Lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) are the most frequent microbial population of raw milk [9] and can be used as protective cultures in this product. However, to date, the use of protective cultures is not regulated in the PDO “Torta del Casar” cheese [1] and it has not been reported in the literature either.
Lacticaseibacillus casei 116 and Lactococcus garvieae 151 strains have been previously selected by their antagonistic effect against L. monocytogenes in “Torta del Casar” cheese [10]. L. casei isolated from dairy products has been associated to antimicrobial activity, improvement of sensory characteristic of milk products and even functional activities as probiotic [11]. Lc. garvieae has been reported in dairy products such as goat cheese and raw cow milk [12]. In addition, strains of this species isolated from dairy products has been proposed as a probiotic for controlling the pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus in cheese made with raw milk [13]. However, before proposing some of these strains as possible protective cultures in this kind of cheese, it is necessary to evaluate that there are no negative effects on volatile compound generation throughout ripening and in the final sensorial characteristics of this product.
The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the addition of selected LAB strains isolated from raw ewe´s milk cheeses on the evolution of the volatile compounds throughout the ripening process and the final sensory traits of “Torta del Casar” cheese.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Origin of the Strains and Growth Conditions

The L. casei 116 (No. P202131120) and Lc. garvieae 151 strains maintained at the Food Hygiene and Safety Culture Collection at the University of Extremadura (Cáceres, Spain), have been used for the inoculation of traditional raw ewe´s milk cheese. These strains were isolated from traditional ripened soft cheeses and selected by its antagonist activity against L. monocytogenes in cheese-based agar following the methodology described by Martín et al. [14].
To prepare LAB inoculum, 100 μL of the stock culture (stored in Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) broth (Fisher Bioreagents, Madrid, Spain) containing 20% (w/v) glycerol at −80 °C) were inoculated onto 10 mL of MRS broth and incubated for 48 h at 30 °C. At the end of the incubation, ≈8.0 log CFU/mL cells were obtained and an aliquot of this was diluted in 1% (w/v) peptone water (Conda, Madrid, Spain) to reach a final concentration of approximately 7.0 log CFU/mL. Then, cultures were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min, and the supernatants were discarded. The sediments were then washed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Fisher Bioreagents) and used for the inoculation of the “Torta del Casar” cheese after salting. To verify the level of inoculation, serial dilutions were poured onto MRS agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated anaerobically at 30 °C for 72 h. In addition, the initial counts (CFU/g) of L. casei 116 and Lc. garvieae 151 on the curd were determined at day 0 of processing.

2.2. Preparation of “Torta del Casar” Cheese

To avoid contamination in the industry with the two assayed LAB strains (L. casei 116 and Lc. garvieae 151), since their industrial use are not allowed at the moment, the “Torta del Casar” cheeses used in this study were first elaborated in a cheese factory located in Cáceres (Extremadura region, Spain) and immediately, in the first day of processing, were transported to the pilot plant of the Faculty of Veterinary under refrigerated conditions where they were inoculated. After that, the cheeses were ripened for 90 days. In this factory, the curds from three different cheeses were made, using raw milk from at least five different farms, with an approximate weight of 0.5 kg. They were elaborated by pressing for 1.5 h and salted in brine for 1 h. After salting, the curds were transported from the factory to the Faculty of Veterinary at <2 °C for their inoculation. The inoculation was carried out in the center of the curd (in a cube with a 16 cm2 surface and a depth of 6 cm [the entire volume of curd], and ≈100 g of weight). According to the inoculated microorganisms, three batches of cheeses were manufactured: batch C (uninoculated control), batch Lc (inoculated only with L. casei at ≈7 log CFU/g) and batch Lg (inoculated only with Lc. garvieae ≈7 log CFU/g). The two bacterium inocula were prepared each in a final volume of 1 mL of PBS with sterile micropipettes in a laminar flow cabinet (Telstar, Spain). In batch C, 1 mL of sterilized PBS was added instead of the bacterium inoculum.
After inoculation, the cheeses’ curds were ripened in a chamber of the pilot plant following the industrial conditions used for this product: 35 days at 6 °C and 90% relative humidity (RH), 10 days at 8 °C and 80 % RH, 10 days at 9 °C and 80 % RH. Finally, cheeses were kept at 10 °C and 80% RH for 35 days.
Five cheeses of each batch were taken at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days of ripening for microbiological, physicochemical, and volatile compound analysis. In ripened cheeses, color, texture, and sensory analysis were also determined. All analyses were carried out in quintuplicate. For the microbiological analysis, the entire cube (16 cm2 of surface and 6 cm deep) of cheeses was used during all sampling times. Thus, the experiment consisting of 3 different batches ×5 sampling times ×5 different cheese/each batch and sampling time, which were evaluated once, according to the European Union Reference Laboratory Technical Guidance Document for conducting shelf-life studies on L. monocytogenes in RTE foods (such as “Torta del Casar” cheese) where no growth or the growth probability of this pathogen is ≤10% [15].

2.3. Microbiological Analysis

The total viable aerobic microbial and LAB counts were determined on Plate Count Agar (PCA; Pronadisa, Spain) and MRS (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) agar, respectively. Both agar media were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions, respectively. Finally, the Enterobacteriaceae were counted on Violet Red Bile Glucose (VRBG, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) agar, and the incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 48 h under aerobic conditions. After incubation, colonies with the expected characteristics were counted and results were expressed as log CFU/g.
The evaluation of the implantation of L. casei 116 and Lc. garvieae 151 in the batches Lc and Lg was conducted in MRS plates in the last sampling time (90 days) following the procedure described by Martín et al. [16]. The identification of the LAB strains was performed by sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA region according to the methodology proposed by Walter et al., [17] and PFGE analysis of the DNA following procedures previously described by Alía et al. [18]. Most of the investigated LAB isolates of Lc and Lg were identified as L. casei 116 and Lc. garvieae 151, respectively, by sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA region and PFGE analysis, confirming the implantation of these strains in the inoculated batches.

2.4. Physicochemical Analysis

The water activity (aw) of “Torta del Casar” cheeses was determined at 25 °C by using a Novasina Lab Master meter (Novasina AG, Lachen, Switzerland). Calibration was achieved by using several saturated solutions of known aw. The pH was measured using a pH-meter model 340 (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland) calibrated with 3 different standard pH solutions (4.0, 7.0 and 9.25). Moisture content (%) was gravimetrically analyzed following the official method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [19].

2.5. Instrumental Texture

The texture analysis was performed at room temperature using a Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) and was carried out in triplicate of each of the five cheese samples composing each batch at the end or the ripening time. Cutting slices of cheese approximately 1 cm thick was measured. The instrument used was a TA XT Plus Texture Analyzer (StableMicro Systems Ltd., Godalming, UK) equipped with a cylindrical probe of 5 cm in diameter. The TPA settings were as follows: 0.83 mm/s pre- and test speed, 1.67 mm/s post-test speed, deformation of 35% for 0.0833 min and activation force of 0.049 N. In these conditions hardness (N), springiness (cm), cohesiveness, gumminess (N), chewiness (N cm), and adhesiveness (N s) were evaluated.

2.6. Instrumental Color

Color was determined on the cut surface of each sample using a Minolta CR-300 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Inc; Nieuwegein, The Netherlands) with an illuminant D65, a 0° standard observer and one port/display area of 2.5 cm. that was calibrated before use with a white tile having the following values: L* = 93.5, a* = 1.0 and b* = 0.8. Color was expressed according to the Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) system and reported as CIE L* (lightness), CIE a* (redness), CIE b* (yellowness), in which the chroma and hue angle were calculated as (a*2 + b*2)0.5 and tan −1(b*/a*), respectively.

2.7. Volatile Compound Analysis

The volatile compounds in soft cheeses were extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) after heating to 37 °C for 30 min, using a divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) 50/30 µm fiber (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany). They were then analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in a Gas Chromatograph 6890 GC (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a HP-5 column (5% phenyl−95% dimethylpolysiloxane) and coupled to a mass spectrometer (MS) detector, 5975C (Agilent Technologies). Oven temperature started at 40 °C for 5 min and was increased to 280 °C, with a rate of 7 °C/min. The desorption time was 30 min at 250 °C. The transfer line temperature was established at 280 °C. The carrier gas was helium (Air Liquide, Madrid, Spain) with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. MS detection was performed in full scan (50–350 amu). Automated peaks search and spectral deconvolution were used for data treatment, and the identification of the volatile compounds was achieved by comparing their mass spectra with the NIST/EPA/NIH library (Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Volatile compound identifications were confirmed based on comparisons of the linear retention index of standards of a series of n-alkanes analyzed under identical conditions to the samples.

2.8. Sensory Evaluation

A triangular of olfactory analysis (discriminant test) was carried out in this study with a semi-trained panel of 24, including students and lectures at the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences (University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Extremadura (reference 77/2017) for studies involving humans. The panel sessions were held around 2 h before lunch in the sensory panel booth room at the Faculty of Veterinary Science of the University of Extremadura in Cáceres (Spain). Information about sex and age of each volunteer was required. Three samples were presented to each volunteer, marked with random three digits’ codes, and served at room temperature on white plastic plates. In this triangular test the null hypothesis establishes that the probability of randomly choosing a different sample is p = 1/3 [20] and the level of significance p ≤ 0.05.

2.9. Statistical Analyses

For the statistical analysis of the data, the software IBM SPSS Statistic version 20 (IBM, New York, NY, USA) was used. Once the dependent (microbiological level, aw, pH, moisture content, texture, color, volatile compounds) and independent (different batches and days of ripening) variables of the analysis were determined, a study of the normality of the different data populations was carried out using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Subsequently, the analysis of the data was conducted using the Mann–Whitney test [21]. Statistical significance was established at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Parameters

The evolution of the physicochemical parameters during ripening is presented in Figure 1. The moisture content (%) decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) during ripening from initial levels around 88% to 35–38% at the end of ripening in all batches studied (Figure 1a). These values are similar to those found in soft-ripened cheeses by Ordiales et al. [22]. There were no differences between batches C and Lc throughout the ripening period; although, the moisture content values of the batch inoculated with Lc. garvieae (Lg) were significantly lower at days 30 and 45 (Figure 1a). However, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between batches at the end of the ripening time.
The aw ranged from initial values of 0.975 to 0.938 at the end of ripening (Figure 1b). Similar evolution in the aw was reported by Ordiales et al. [22] in “Torta del Casar” cheese. No significant differences (p > 0.05) in aw values were found between batches during the ripening.
The pH values decreased until day 30 of ripening in the three analyzed batches to reach levels of around 5.20 (Figure 1c). However, at days 45, 60 and 90 the pH increased to reach levels around 5.8 at the end of ripening. The increase in pH values of ripened cheese might be due to the decomposition of lactic acid and the formation of basic compounds derived from the hydrolysis of proteins [23,24]. Small differences in the pH values between batches were found, only at day 90, the batch in which L. casei was inoculated (batch Lc) showed a pH significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than that found in the control batch (batch C).
Thus, only little and punctual differences over the physicochemical parameters of “Torta del Casar” cheese (humidity and pH) as a result of the inoculation of the selected LAB strains L. casei and Lc. garvieae were observed, but in general, these microorganisms did not affect these parameters on soft-ripened cheeses. These results contrast with those found by Jia et al. [23] in semi-hard goat cheese, who reported that the addition of selected starter cultures could decrease the pH of matured cheese.

3.2. Enumeration of Microorganisms

Table 1 shows the results obtained from the enumeration of microorganisms. The total viable aerobic microbial and LAB counts showed similar levels and, higher than 8 log CFU/g, in all batches studied and all sampling days. The total viable microbial and LAB counts were similar to those found in other soft cheeses clotted with vegetable rennet [2,25]. Thus, LAB is the predominant microbial group during the ripening of soft ewe’s milk cheeses made with raw milk and clotted with vegetable rennet, such as “Serra da Estrela”, “Serpa”, “Queso de la Serena” and “Torta del Casar” cheese [26,27].
On the other hand, the levels of Enterobacteriaceae were high (≈6.8 log CFU/g) in all batches at the beginning of the ripening (day 0), probably as this kind of cheese is made with raw milk. A significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in this microbial group was observed throughout the ripening in all batches, including uninoculated control (Table 1), probably due to aw decrease and the antimicrobial effect of the dominant LAB population. Similar levels of Enterobacteriaceae have been previously reported in soft ripened cheese made with raw milk [22,28,29].

3.3. Analysis of Volatile Compounds

A total of 34 volatile compounds were identified in all the three analyzed batches of “Torta del Casar” cheese throughout the 90-day ripening including carboxylic acids, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones and esters (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). Most of the identified compounds have also been reported in other studies of “Torta del Casar” cheeses and other types of similar soft-bodied cheeses [22,23,30].

3.3.1. Acids

Carboxylic acids were the most abundant volatile compounds found (Table 2). The discovery of this wide range of carboxylic acids might be due to the lipolytic LAB activity [23]. Within these compounds, acetic, hexanoic and 3-methyl-butanoic acids were found in higher levels in all batches (Table 2). In the LAB-inoculated batches Lc and Lg, 2-methyl-propanoic acid was also found to be the most abundant one at the end of the ripening period (Table 2). Acetic and hexanoic acids have been reported as the acids found in the highest amounts in ripened “Torta del Casar” cheese [22]. In general, most acids showed significant (p ≤ 0.05) increases throughout the ripening process in both the uninoculated control and inoculated batches, especially the methyl-branched acids that were detected at low levels or non-detected at day 0 of ripening (Table 2). The formation of acids in “Torta del Casar” cheese is caused by enzymes, mainly from vegetal rennet, and microbial activity [31,32].
Regarding linear n-acids evolution, only scarce differences were found between batches throughout the ripening process. Thus, only acetic acid at day 0, butanoic acid at 45 and 60 and octanoic and propanoic acids at day 30 showed significantly higher amounts in one of the inoculated batches than in the control one (Table 2). In addition, hexanoic acid showed a lower level in batch Lg than in the control batch at 45 days of ripening. However, none of these differences between batches in n-acids abundance was found at the end of ripening, except for propanoic acid that showed a significantly higher amount in batch Lg than in the control batch (Table 2). Acetic and propanoic acids could have a microbial origin as a result of lactose fermentation; mainly some LAB [33]. Short-chain fatty acids have low perception thresholds and provide typical aroma notes to cheeses such as Cheddar, Roncal, Emmental, Camembert and Grana Padano [31].
When the evolution of methyl-branched acids is studied, it is remarkable that at day 90 of ripening most of these compounds (2-methyl-propanoic acid, 3-methyl-butanoic acid and 2-methyl-butanoic acid) showed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher abundance in Lc and Lg than in control batches. Branched-chain carboxylic acids such as 2-methyl-propanoic, 3-methylbutanoic and 2-methylbutanoic acids, derived from the catabolism of valine, leucine and isoleucine, respectively [34], mainly from microbial origin [35]. In the present work the microbial activity of the selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae strains to generate branched-chain carboxylic acids seems to be demonstrated since they were detected in higher amounts in inoculated rather than control batches. Thus, inoculation of the selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae could contribute to the aroma of “Torta del Casar” cheese since the 2-methylbutanoic acid and 3-methylbutanoic acids make contributions to the overall aroma and flavor [36].

3.3.2. Alcohols, Ketones and Aldehydes

Table 3 shows the results for alcohols, ketones and aldehydes. The alcohols 2-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, 2,3-butanediol, 2-butoxy-ethanol and 2,6-dimethyl-4-heptanol increased their levels throughout the ripening process, while 2-methyl-1-propanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol and phenyl-ethyl-alcohol showed higher abundance at day 0 of ripening and decreased during maturation. The most abundant alcohols at the end of the ripening were 2-butanol and 2,3-butanediol. The 2-butanol derived from 2,3-butanediol by the action of LAB [37], while the microbial reduction in acetoin could be the origin of 2,3-butanediol [38].
Branched-chain alcohols 2-methyl-1-propanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol come from the reduction in branched-chain aldehydes and can be found in raw milk cheeses with intense proteolysis due to vegetable rennet [39] as is the case of “Torta del Casar”. In fact, the former authors found 3-methyl-1-butanol as the major alcohol in “La Serena” cheese also made with vegetable rennet.
The evolution of the production in alcohol compounds throughout the ripening process was very similar in the three analyzed batches (Table 3). In ripened cheeses the only significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between batches were the lower amount of 2-butanol and 2-methyl-1-propanol in batch Lc than in the control and Lg batches and the lower amount of 2,3-butanediol and 2-butoxy-ethanol in batch Lg than in the remaining batches.
A low abundance of ketones was detected at the beginning of ripening, but significant increases for all detected compounds of this group were found after 90 days of ripening (Table 3). Ketones are abundant constituents of most dairy products and have typical odors and low perception thresholds [23,40]. Thus, they could play an important role in the final aroma of “Torta del Casar” cheese. The 2-butane-one and 2-heptane-one were the most abundant ketones detected during ripening. Similar results have been found in “Torta del Casar” [40] and in other cheeses made with raw sheep’s milk such as “La Serena” cheeses [39]. In the present work, 2-nonanone showed significantly higher abundance in batches Lc and Lg than in control batches, while 2-heptanone and 2-butanone were encountered in higher amounts in the control than in the LAB-inoculated batches (Table 3). These compounds are derived from β-oxidation of fatty acids, that are first oxidized to α-ketoacids, which are further decarboxylated to their corresponding methyl-ketones with one carbon atom less, such as 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone and 2-butanone and finally the methyl-ketones can be reduced to secondary alcohols [41]. These compounds are necessary to cheese aroma, but since they are derived from β-oxidation of fatty acids, their production should be not stimulated, as could happen with the inoculation of selected LAB assayed, to avoid rancidity notes.
As aldehydes, only 3-methylbutanal was identified throughout the ripening process. The aldehydes have been reported as minor compounds in these kind of soft cheeses, probably due to their instability since they are reduced to alcohols or oxidized to acids [40]. High concentrations of aldehydes are associated with the development of off-flavors in cheese [42] so an increase throughout the processing would be negative for the global aroma of this product. In the present work, a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in 3-methylbutanal was observed throughout the ripening process in all the analyzed batches. The 3-methylbutanal, derived from the degradation of amino acid leucine [43,44], is probably a consequence of proteolysis from vegetal rennet and microbial origin. Nevertheless, since no significant differences (p > 0.05) between batches were detected in 3-methylbutanal in the present work, it seems that the selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae have a low impact on the production of this compound; at least no difference of the probable effect of LAB was present in control samples from contamination origin.

3.3.3. Esters and Other Compounds

A decrease in most of the esters throughout the ripening process was observed in all batches (Table 4). Most of the identified esters were ethyl esters, which could be important contributors to the typical aroma of “Torta del Casar” cheeses [30,40]. Some LAB, as well as chemical reactions, are involved in ester formation in soft-ripened cheeses [45]. In the present work, few differences between batches were detected throughout the ripening process, aside from the fact that it is noticeable that in the final product the abundance of hexanoic acid, ethyl ester, octanoic acid, ethyl ester, decanoic acid, ethyl ester and 1-butanol, 3-methyl-, acetate was lower in batch Lc than in control and Lg batches (Table 4). Although some of these esters have a sweet, fruity and ice-cream flavor and could contribute positively to the aroma of ripened cheese, it should be considered that t this also may have a negative influence, depending on the concentration and type of cheese [23].
Other compounds were also detected throughout the processing in most of the analyzed batches including two pyrazines (trimethyl-pyrazine and 2,5-dimethyl-pyrazine), dimethyl disulfide, and 1,5,9-decatriene, 2,3,5,8-tetramethyl- (Table 4). Only dimethyl disulfide and the alkyl pyrazines increased during the maturation (Table 4). Dimethyl disulfide detected at similar levels in all analyzed batches has been reported in ripened cheeses as degradation of methional that derived from amino acid methionine, but its contribution to the aroma of cheeses is only marginal [46]. Alkyl pyrazines are produced in cheese via the condensation of aminoketones, which are formed mainly through Maillard and Strecker degradation reactions [46]. From the results, only trimethyl-pyrazine showed differences between batches in ripened cheeses. Therefore, batch Lc showed a higher abundance of trimethyl-pyrazine than the remaining batches (Table 4). Trimethyl-pyrazine has been reported in ripened cheeses and it has been associated as being strong savory to musty and potato-like [46].
From the analysis of all the above volatile compounds, it can be deduced that the addition to “Torta del Casar” cheese of the selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae did not negatively affect the flavor development and could even have a positive effect on the aroma, due to their contribution to the generation of methyl branched compounds (mainly methyl branched acids) and as they do not increase and may even reduce oxidation compounds from β-oxidation of fatty acids, as can be observed in Figure 2 where the addition of an abundant area of methyl branched and β-oxidation compounds are represented.

3.4. Texture and Colour Analysis

The texture is an important characteristic of cheese in deciding consumer acceptability [40]. The results obtained from the texture and color parameters of the cheese batches at the end of ripening are shown in Table 5. No differences in texture analysis were observed between control (batch C) and LAB-inoculated cheeses (Lc and Lg batches). Medved´ová et al. [47] also did not find significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the texture of the cheeses when L. rhamnosus was added. However, these results contrast with the pronounced effect found by Jia et al. [23] in semi-hard goat cheeses inoculated with selected LAB starter cultures. Regarding color determination, no differences (p > 0.05) were observed between those inoculated with L. casei (Lc) and control (C) batches in any of the parameters studied. The only differences (p ≤ 0.05) observed were those between the inoculated batch with Lc. garvieae (Lg) and the control batch in the parameter L* (lightness). The a*(redness) and b*(yellowness) values of all batches were very similar (p > 0.05).

3.5. Sensory Evaluation

In the triangular olfactory analysis, no differences between batches were found, and no negative effect in the aroma was encountered for any of the panelists in any of the batches analyzed. Thus, the addition of the selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae to “Torta del Casar” cheese did not provoke detectable changes in the aroma of the product.

4. Conclusions

LAB is the predominant microbial group during the ripening of inoculated and non-inoculated “Torta del Casar” cheeses. The inoculation of selected L. casei and Lc. garvieae did not affect physicochemical parameters covering humidity, aw, pH and texture and color of the ripened cheeses. Carboxylic acids were the most abundant volatile compounds found during ripening and the methyl-branched acids were detected in a higher abundance in inoculated ripened cheeses. No effect in the olfactory evaluation was detected by panelists due to L. casei and Lc. garvieae, although they could have a positive effect on the aroma, for their contribution to the generation of methyl branched compounds (mainly methyl branched acids) and for not increasing and even reducing oxidation compounds from β-oxidation of fatty acids.

5. Patents

Martín, I., Rodríguez, A and Córdoba, J.J, inventor 2021. New strain of Lacticaseibacillus casei 116 with antagonist effect against Listeria monocytogenes to be used as protective culture in ripened cheese. No. P202131120.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed significantly to the research. Conceptualization, J.J.C. and A.R.; methodology, I.M.; investigation, I.M.; data curation, I.M.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M. and J.J.C.; writing—review and editing, I.M., A.R., C.G. and J.J.C.; supervision, A.R., C.G. and J.J.C.; project administration, J.J.C.; funding acquisition, J.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to thank the projects RTA-2017-00027-C03-03 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/50110001103 and grants IB16149 and GR18056 funded by Junta de Extremadura and by “European Union ERDF A way of making Europe”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Extremadura (reference 77/2017) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

I. Martín was recipient of the FPU 16/05303 grant funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Commision Regulation (EC). Commision Regulation (EC) No 1491/2003 of 25 August 2003. Off. J. Eur. Union 2003, 10, 2002–2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Crespo, A.; Jiménez, A.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Merchán, A.V.; Galván, A.I.; Benito, M.J.; Martín, A. Low-frequency ultrasound as a tool for quality control of soft-bodied raw ewe’s milk cheeses. Food Control 2022, 131, 108405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pereira, C.I.; Graça, J.A.; Ogando, N.S.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Xavier Malcata, F. Influence of bacterial dynamics upon the final characteristics of model Portuguese traditional cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carrascosa, C.; Millán, R.; Saavedra, P.; Jaber, J.R.; Raposo, A.; Sanjuán, E. Identification of the risk factors associated with cheese production to implement the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) system on cheese farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 2606–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martinez-Rios, V.; Dalgaard, P. Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in European cheeses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Control 2018, 84, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amato, E.; Filipello, V.; Gori, M.; Lomonaco, S.; Losio, M.N.; Parisi, A.; Huedo, P.; Knabel, S.J.; Pontello, M. Identification of a major Listeria monocytogenes outbreak clone linked to soft cheese in Northern Italy—2009–2011. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Possas, A.; Bonilla-Luque, O.M.; Valero, A. From cheese-making to consumption: Exploring the microbial safety of cheeses through predictive microbiology models. Foods 2021, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rolim, F.R.L.; Freitas Neto, O.C.; Oliveira, M.E.G.; Oliveira, C.J.B.; Queiroga, R.C.R.E. Cheeses as food matrixes for probiotics: In vitro and in vivo tests. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 138–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gezginc, Y.; Karabekmez-Erdem, T.; Tatar, H.D.; Dağgeçen, E.C.; Ayman, S.; Akyol, İ. Metagenomics and volatile profile of Turkish artisanal Tulum cheese microbiota. Food Biosci. 2022, 45, 101497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martín, I.; Cordoba, J.J.; Alía, A.; Martínez, R.; Rodríguez, A. Selection and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from traditional ripened foods with activity against Listeria monocytogenes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 163, 113579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bezerril, F.F.; Pimentel, T.C.; Marília da Silva Sant’Ana, A.; de Fátima Vanderlei de Souza, M.; Lucena de Medeiros, L.; Galvão, M.; Madruga, M.S.; de Cássia Ramos do Egypto Queiroga, R.; Magnani, M. Lacticaseibacillus casei 01 improves the sensory characteristics in goat milk yogurt added with xique-xique (Pilosocereus gounellei) jam through changes in volatiles concentration. LWT 2022, 154, 112598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fernández, E.; Alegría, Á.; Delgado, S.; Mayo, B. Phenotypic, genetic and technological characterization of Lactococcus garvieae strains isolated from a raw milk cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abdelfatah, E.N.; Mahboub, H.H.H. Studies on the effect of Lactococcus garvieae of dairy origin on both cheese and Nile tilapia (O. niloticus). Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018, 6, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martín, I.; Rodríguez, A.; Alía, A.; Martínez-Blanco, M.; Lozano-Ojalvo, D.; Córdoba, J.J. Control of Listeria monocytogenes growth and virulence in a traditional soft cheese model system based on lactic acid bacteria and a whey protein hydrolysate with antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 361, 109444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beaufort, A.; Cornu, M.; Bergis, H.; Lardeux, A.L.; Lombard, B. EURL Lm Technical Guiadance Document for Conducing Shelf-Life Studies on Listeria monocytogenes in Ready to Eat Foods. Available online: https://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/EURL%20Lm_Technical%20Guidance%20Document%20Lm%20shelf-life%20studies_V3_2014-06-06%20(2).pdf (accessed on 26 July 2022).
  16. Martín, I.; Rodríguez, A.; Sánchez-Montero, L.; Padilla, P.; Córdoba, J.J. Effect of the dry-cured fermented sausage “salchichón” processing with a selected Lactobacillus sakei in Listeria monocytogenes and microbial population. Foods 2021, 10, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Walter, J.; Tannock, G.W.; Tilsala-Timisjarvi, A.; Rodtong, S.; Loach, D.M.; Munro, K.; Alatossava, T. Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alía, A.; Andrade, M.J.; Rodríguez, A.; Martín, I.; Pérez-Baltar, A.; Medina, M.; Córdoba, J.J. Prevalence and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes in deboning and slicing areas of Spanish dry-cured ham processing. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 128, 109498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. AOAC. Moisture in Malt Gravimetric Method (935.29), 17th ed.; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Portalo-Calero, F.; Arroyo, P.; Suárez, J.I.; Lozano, J. Triangular test of amanita mushrooms by using electronic nose and sensory panel. Foods 2019, 8, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mann, H.B.; Whitney, D. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 1947, 2, 347–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ordiales, E.; Martín, A.; Benito, M.J.; Hernández, A.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; de Guía Córdoba, M. Role of the microbial population on the flavor of the soft-bodied cheese Torta del Casar. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 5477–5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jia, R.; Zhang, F.; Song, Y.; Lou, Y.; Zhao, A.; Liu, Y.; Peng, H.; Hui, Y.; Ren, R.; Wang, B. Physicochemical and textural characteristics and volatile compounds of semihard goat cheese as affected by starter cultures. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Özer, E.; Kesenkaş, H. The effect of using different starter culture combinations on ripening parameters, microbiological and sensory properties of Mihaliç cheese. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1202–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ordiales, E.; Martín, A.; Benito, M.J.; Fernández, M.; Casquete, R.; de Guía Córdoba, M. Influence of the technological properties of vegetable rennet (Cynara cardunculus) on the physicochemical, sensory and rheological characteristics of “Torta del Casar” cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2014, 67, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ordiales, E.; Benito, M.J.; Martín, A.; Casquete, R.; Serradilla, M.J.; de Guía Córdoba, M. Bacterial communities of the traditional raw ewe’s milk cheese “Torta del Casar” made without the addition of a starter. Food Control 2013, 33, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gonçalves, M.T.P.; Benito, M.J.; de Córdoba, M.G.; Egas, C.; Merchán, A.V.; Galván, A.I.; Ruiz-Moyano, S. Bacterial communities in Serpa cheese by culture dependent techniques, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and high-throughput sequencing analysis. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chaves-López, C.; De Angelis, M.; Martuscelli, M.; Serio, A.; Paparella, A.; Suzzi, G. Characterization of the Enterobacteriaceae isolated from an artisanal Italian ewe’s cheese (Pecorino Abruzzese). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tabla, R.; Gómez, A.; Simancas, A.; Rebollo, J.E.; Molina, F.; Roa, I. Enterobacteriaceae species during manufacturing and ripening of semi–hard and soft raw ewe’s milk cheese: Gas production capacity. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 145, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferreira, I.; Pinho, O.; Sampaio, P. Volatile fraction of DOP “Castelo Branco” cheese: Influence of breed. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Curioni, P.M.G.; Bosset, J.O. Key odorants in various cheese types as determined by gas chromatography-olfactometry. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 959–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Delgado, F.J.; Rodríguez-Pinilla, J.; González-Crespo, J.; Ramírez, R.; Roa, I. Proteolysis and texture changes of a Spanish soft cheese (‘Torta del Casar’) manufactured with raw ewe milk and vegetable rennet during ripening. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delgado-Martínez, F.J.; Carrapiso, A.I.; Contador, R.; Ramírez, M.R. Volatile compounds and sensory changes after high pressure processing of mature “Torta del Casar” (raw ewe’s milk cheese) during refrigerated storage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 52, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yvon, M.; Rijnen, L. Cheese flavour formation by amino acid catabolism. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 185–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Calzada, J.; del Olmo, A.; Picon, A.; Nuñez, M. Effect of high pressure processing on the lipolysis, volatile compounds, odour and colour of cheese made from unpasteurized milk. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 1076–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qian, M.; Reineccius, G. Identification of aroma compounds in Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese by gas chromatography/olfactometry. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1362–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghiaci, P.; Lameiras, F.; Norbeck, J.; Larsson, C. Production of 2-butanol through meso-2,3-butanediol consumption in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 360, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morales, P.; Feliu, I.; Fernández-García, E.; Nuñez, M. Volatile compounds produced in cheese by Enterobacteriaceae strains of dairy origin. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carbonell, M.; Nuñez, M.; Fernández-García, E. Evolution of the volatile components of ewe raw milk La Serena cheese during ripening. Correlation with flavour characteristics. Lait 2002, 82, 683–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Delgado, F.J.; González-Crespo, J.; Cava, R.; García-Parra, J.; Ramírez, R. Characterisation by SPME-GC-MS of the volatile profile of a Spanish soft cheese P.D.O. Torta del Casar during ripening. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. van Mastrigt, O.; Gallegos Tejeda, D.; Kristensen, M.N.; Abee, T.; Smid, E.J. Aroma formation during cheese ripening is best resembled by Lactococcus lactis retentostat cultures. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, C.; Lu, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, Z.; Tian, H. Influence of 4 lactic acid bacteria on the flavor profile of fermented apple juice. Food Biosci. 2019, 27, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Meng, H.Y.; Piccand, M.; Fuchsmann, P.; Dubois, S.; Baumeyer, A.; Tena Stern, M.; Von Ah, U. Formation of 3-Methylbutanal and 3-Methylbutan-1-ol Recognized as Malty during Fermentation in Swiss Raclette-Type Cheese, Reconstituted Milk, and de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe Broth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Castada, H.Z.; Hanas, K.; Barringer, S.A. Swiss cheese flavor variability based on correlations of volatile flavor compounds, descriptive sensory attributes, and consumer preference. Foods 2019, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Delgado, F.J.; Rodríguez-Pinilla, J.; Márquez, G.; Roa, I.; Ramírez, R. Physicochemical, proteolysis and texture changes during the storage of a mature soft cheese treated by high-pressure hydrostatic. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 240, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Frank, O.; Jezussek, M.; Hofmann, T. Sensory activity, chemical structure, and synthesis of Maillard generated bitter-tasting 1-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indolizinium-6-olates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2693–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Medved’ová, A.; Koňuchová, M.; Kvočiková, K.; Hatalová, I.; Valík, L. Effect of lactic acid bacteria addition on the microbiological safety of Pasta-filata types of cheeses. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a)Evolution of moisture content; (b) water activity and (c) pH during ripening of “Torta del Casar” cheese. Mean values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between batches at the same incubation day. Control (uninoculated batch), Lc (inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae).
Figure 1. (a)Evolution of moisture content; (b) water activity and (c) pH during ripening of “Torta del Casar” cheese. Mean values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between batches at the same incubation day. Control (uninoculated batch), Lc (inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae).
Foods 11 02658 g001aFoods 11 02658 g001b
Figure 2. Accumulated area (AU × 106) of n-compounds and methyl branched compounds throughout the ripening of “Torta del Casar” cheese in Control, inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei (Lc) and inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae (Lg) batches.
Figure 2. Accumulated area (AU × 106) of n-compounds and methyl branched compounds throughout the ripening of “Torta del Casar” cheese in Control, inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei (Lc) and inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae (Lg) batches.
Foods 11 02658 g002
Table 1. Counts of total aerobic microorganism (TAM), lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) and Enterobacteriaceae (E) throughout “Torta del Casar” cheese ripening.
Table 1. Counts of total aerobic microorganism (TAM), lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) and Enterobacteriaceae (E) throughout “Torta del Casar” cheese ripening.
BatchesMicroorganismDays of Ripening
0456090
CTAM8.08 ± 0.034 cB8.29 ± 0.237 aAB8.36 ± 0.199 bA8.37 ± 0.065 aA
LAB8.14 ±0.079 aA8.11 ± 0.216 aA8.24 ± 0.159 aA8.32 ± 0.132 aA
E6.81 ± 0.294 aA6.17 ± 0.293 aAB6.13 ± 0.245 aAB5.54 ± 0.629 aB
LcTAM8.28 ± 0.046 bB8.62 ± 0.215 aB9.06 ± 0.283 aA8.33 ± 0.141 aB
LAB8.30 ± 0.193 aA8.55 ± 0.158 aA8.68 ± 0.399 aA8.14 ± 0.150 aA
E6.74 ± 0.307 aA6.02 ± 0.182 aB5.81 ± 0.261 aB5.71 ± 0.323 aB
LgTAM8.41 ± 0.050 aAB8.5 ± 0.192 aA8.53 ± 0.355 bA7.99 ± 0.316 bB
LAB 8.23 ± 0.057 aA8.31 ± 0.293 aA8.50 ± 0.229 aA7.94 ± 0.314 aA
E6.96 ± 0.144 aA6.13 ± 0.370 aB5.97 ± 0.097 aBC5.54 ± 0.255 aC
C (uninoculated batch), Lc (inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between batches at the same day and different capital letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between days of ripening at the same batch.
Table 2. Acids (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening process.
Table 2. Acids (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening process.
Origin/CompoundBatchesDays of Ripening
030456090
Acids
Acetic acidC5.88 ± 1.114 bC14.44 ± 5.803 aA15.44 ± 3.855 aA16.88 ± 4.768 aA8.54 ± 0.059 aB
Lc10.50 ± 2.972 aBC16.94 ± 0.681 aA13.66 ± 1.638 aAB14.33 ± 3.647 aAB7.42 ± 0.678 aC
Lg7.72 ± 1.183 bAB14.58 ± 2.117 aAB16.12 ± 6.524 aA18.90 ± 6.212 aA9.25 ± 0.356 aC
Butanoic acidC1.86 ± 0.429 aB3.00 ± 0.258 aB2.97 ± 0.406 bB2.99 ± 0.138 bB5.46 ± 1.380 aA
Lc1.88 ± 0.349 aB3.14 ± 0.143 aAB2.93 ± 0.450 bAB3.46 ± 0.649 bAB4.90 ± 1.446 aA
Lg1.95 ± 0.615 aC3.01 ± 0.012 aB4.35 ± 0.439 aAB4.97 ± 0.497 aA5.45 ± 0.757 aA
Hexanoic acidC4.52 ± 0.937 aC4.44 ± 0.948 aC8.19 ± 0.618 ab29.67 ± 0.778 aAB11.32 ± 2.618 aA
Lc5.06 ± 1.212 aB7.86 ± 0.986 aAB8.83 ± 1.899 a128.83 ± 0.963 aAB11.68 ± 4.520 aA
Lg5.81 ± 1.496 aB7.08 ± 0.789 aB6.84 ± 0.646 b29.75 ± 1.75 aA9.99 ± 1.534 aA
Octanoic acidC0.60 ± 0.148 bB0.38 ± 0.049 bB1.71 ± 0.313 aA2.13 ± 0.252 aA2.34 ± 0.692 aA
Lc0.99 ± 0.330 aB1.62 ± 0.466 aAB2.60 ± 1.631 aAB2.57 ± 0.714 aAB4.64 ± 3.324 aA
Lg0.95 ± 0.255 aAB1.43 ± 0.362 aAB0.47 ± 0.246 aB1.62 ± 1.301 aAB1.94 ±0.493 aA
Propanoic acidCn.d.0.28 ± 0.118 bB0.97 ± 0.446 aAB1.53 ± 0.440 aA0.72 ± 0.529 bAB
Lcn.d.0.88 ± 0.560 aA1.47 ± 0.955 aA1.42 ± 0.467 aA1.45 ± 0.410 abA
Lgn.d.0.25 ± 0.074 bB0.41 ± 0.155 aB1.26 ± 0.412 aA1.71 ± 0.401 aA
2-methyl-propanoic acidC0.12 ± 0.002 aC2.64 ± 1.918 aB6.01 ± 2.742 aA6.40 ± 2.368 aA3.45 ± 0.702 bB
Lc0.12 ± 0.002 aC3.87 ± 1.506 aB8.21 ± 1.757 aAB7.18 ± 2.259 aAB11.94 ± 3.156 aA
Lg0.13 ± 0.004 aC1.02 ± 0.375 bC6.83 ± 1.688 aB6.65 ± 2.955 aB11.02 ± 4.210 aA
3-methyl-butanoic acidC2.00 ± 0.265 aC23.93 ± 1.513 aB47.41 ± 5.618 aA54.71 ± 2.382 bA28.59 ± 4.543 bB
Lc0.69 ± 0.113 bD16.41 ± 2.777 aC41.59 ± 9.609 aBC126.91 ± 12.188 aA79.43 ± 3.102 aB
Lg1.33 ± 0.973 abC10.13 ± 2.629 bB15.85 ± 2.838 bB63.26 ± 3.974 bA61.67 ± 2.608 aA
2-methyl-butanoic acidCn.d.0.93 ± 0.541 aB3.17 ± 1.271 aA3.78 ± 0.614 aA2.75 ± 0.631 bA
Lcn.d.1.37 ± 0.874 aC2.36 ± 0.771 abBC5.08 ± 2.271 aA4.35 ± 0.768 aAB
Lgn.d.0.60 ± 0.145 aB1.04 ± 0.258 bB3.11 ± 1.435 aAB3.83 ± 0.749 abA
3-methyl-2-butenioc acidCn.d.n.d.0.19 ± 0.040 aA0.29 ± 0.068 aA0.17 ± 0.041 aA
Lcn.d.n.d.0.22 ± 0.058 aA0.35 ± 0.172 aA0.20 ± 0.055 aA
Lgn.d.n.d.0.14 ± 0.002 aA0.20 ± 0.078 aA0.16 ± 0.020 aA
Control (uninoculated batch), Lc (batch inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (batch inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Mean values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between batches at the same day and compound studied. The mean values with different capital letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between days at the same batch and compound studied. n.d. not detected.
Table 3. Alcohols, ketones and aldehydes (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening process.
Table 3. Alcohols, ketones and aldehydes (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening process.
Origin/CompoundBatchesDays of Ripening
030456090
Alcohols
2-butanol, (R)-Cn.d.n.d.4.27 ± 1.14 bB12.42 ± 0.860 aA12.94 ± 1.005 aA
Lcn.d.n.d.7.58 ± 1.94 aA5.27 ± 1.198 bA5.26 ± 0.827 bA
Lgn.d.n.d.2.21 ± 0.311 cB10.21 ± 3.759 aA12.70 ± 1.434 aA
2-methyl-1-propanolC0.19 ± 0.014 aAB0.20 ± 0.011 aAB0.17 ± 0.031 aB0.14 ± 0.032 aB0.25 ± 0.081 aA
Lc0.18 ± 0.026 aA0.17 ± 0.027 aA0.16 ± 0.038 aA0.14 ± 0.035 aA0.14 ± 0.002 bA
Lg0.17 ± 0.010 aA0.18 ± 0.052 aA0.16 ± 0.044 aA0.15 ± 0.058 aA0.17 ± 0.034 abA
3-methyl-1-butanolC8.29 ± 0.538 aA5.70 ± 0.712 aB3.92 ± 0.426 aC3.20 ± 0.267 aC2.97 ± 0.607 aC
Lc6.14 ± 0.192 bA4.63 ± 0.755 aB4.09 ± 1.013 aB2.61 ± 0.804 aC2.57 ± 0.211 aC
Lg5.93 ± 0.219 bA5.14 ± 0.410 aA3.94 ± 0.818 aB3.40 ± 0.890 aBC2.75 ± 0.286 aC
2-methyl-1-butanolCn.d.0.11 ± 0.016 aAn.d.n.d.0.16 ± 0.042 aA
Lcn.d.n.d.n.d.0.12 ± 0.022 aA0.21 ± 0.015 aA
Lgn.d.n.d.0.12 ± 0.009 aA0.11 ± 0.000 aA0.15 ± 0.027 aA
Phenylethyl alcoholC1.36 ± 0.137 aA0.86 ± 0.094 bC1.04 ± 0.151 aBC1.02 ± 0.173 aAB0.93 ± 0.089 aC
Lc1.25 ± 0.039 aA1.08 ± 0.075 aA1.07 ± 0.308 aA0.99 ± 0.145 aA0.89 ± 0.207 aA
Lg1.30 ± 0.404 aA1.21 ± 0.180 aAB0.92 ± 0.164 aAB0.97 ± 0.149 aAB0.80 ± 0.149 aB
2,3-butanediol, [R-(R*,R*)]-C2.80 ± 0.853 aB15.42 ± 1.458 aA10.01 ± 1.038 bA9.59 ± 1.204 abAB10.93 ± 0.449 aA
Lc2.54 ± 0.822 aB14.50 ± 1.181 aA4.20 ± 0.973 cAB6.19 ± 0.959 bAB3.09 ± 0.144 bB
Lg2.58 ± 0.738 aC14.32 ± 1.674 aAB14.81 ± 0.634 aA12.59 ± 1.500 aA5.77 ± 0.528 bBC
2-butoxy-ethanolCn.d.0.27 ± 0.054 aA0.20 ± 0.089 bAB0.15 ± 0.021 bB0.23 ± 0.083 bAB
Lcn.d.0.30 ± 0.056 aA0.24 ± 0.082 bAB0.20 ± 0.033 bB0.22 ± 0.039 bAB
Lgn.d.0.32 ± 0.052 aB0.39 ± 0.036 aA0.37 ± 0.041 aA0.36 ± 0.042 aA
2,6-dimethyl-4-heptanolCn.d.0.26 ± 0.004 aA0.37 ± 0.462 aA0.19 ± 0.022 aA0.18 ± 0.037 aA
Lcn.d.0.19 ± 0.017 aB0.66 ± 0.146 aA0.28 ± 0.159 aB0.37 ± 0.029 aB
Lgn.d.0.24 ± 0.023 aA0.35 ± 0.211 aA0.18 ± 0.048 aA0.19 ± 0.015 aA
Ketones
2-nonanoneC0.38 ± 0.086 abB0.14 ± 0.038 aB0.41 ± 0.339 aB0.19 ± 0.002 aB0.61 ± 0.021 bA
Lc0.54 ± 0.182 aB0.13 ± 0.006 aB0.21 ± 0.089 aB0.18 ± 0.056 aB0.95 ± 0.050 aA
Lg0.23 ± 0.028 bB0.16 ± 0.036 aB0.18 ± 0.051 aB0.11 ± 0.006 aB0.79 ± 0.152 abA
2-heptanoneC0.32 ± 0.009 aAB0.12 ± 0.032 aB0.26 ± 0.078 aAB0.16 ± 0.052 aB5.23 ± 2.880 aA
Lc0.38 ± 0.138 aAB0.12 ± 0.004 aB0.19 ± 0.091 aAB0.18 ± 0.060 aAB1.10 ± 0.096 bA
Lg0.27 ± 0.057 aB0.13 ± 0.004 aB0.28 ± 0.155 aB0.13 ± 0.009 aB0.98 ± 0.147 bA
2,3-butanedioneC0.25 ± 0.040 aC0.57 ± 0.104 aABC0.88 ± 0.322 aA0.72 ± 0.221 aAB0.40 ± 0.115 abBC
Lc0.27 ± 0.066 aC0.43 ± 0.075 abC1.00 ± 0.128 aA0.69 ± 0.140 aB0.34 ± 0.080 bC
Lg0.26 ± 0.079 aC0.39 ± 0.104 bBC1.16 ± 0.202 aA0.56 ± 0.066 aB0.41 ± 0.037 aBC
2-pentanoneC0.16 ± 0.038 aA0.12 ± 0.012 aA0.15 ± 0.004 aAn.d.1.27 ± 0.103 aA
Lcn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.87 ± 0.098 aA
Lgn.d.n.d.0.16 ± 0.095 aAn.d.0.40 ± 0.021 aA
2-butanoneC0.30 ± 0.099 aD1.12 ± 0.626 aD10.17 ± 1.942 aC18.70 ± 1.575 aB35.37 ± 4.673 aA
Lc0.31 ± 0.096 aD1.13 ± 0.403 aD9.62 ± 1.403 aC15.76 ± 1.897 bB25.99 ± 3.316 bA
Lg0.28 ± 0.117 aD0.53 ± 0.220 aD9.30 ± 3.246 aC17.64 ± 1.161 abA31.63 ± 1.967 abA
Aldehydes
3-methyl-butanalC0.17 ± 0.020 aB0.38 ± 0.112 aAB0.34 ± 0.142 abAB0.61 ± 0.202 aA0.60 ± 0.049 aAB
Lc0.17 ± 0.020 aB0.33 ± 0.151 aAB0.55 ± 0.100 aA0.41 ± 0.185 bAB0.69 ± 0.027 aA
Lg0.16 ±0.013 aB0.22 ± 0.039 aB0.21 ± 0.088 bB0.31 ± 0.155 bB0.68 ± 0.130 aA
Control (uninoculated batch), Lc (batch inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (batch inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Mean values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between batches at the same day and compound studied. The means with different capital letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between days at the same batch and compound studied. n.d. not detected.
Table 4. Esters and others volatile compounds (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening.
Table 4. Esters and others volatile compounds (AU × 106) of “Torta del Casar” cheese during the ripening.
Origin/CompoundBatchesDays of Ripening
030456090
Esters
Butanoic acid, ethyl esterC1.67 ± 0.156 aA0.40 ± 0.151 aB0.17 ± 0.027 aBC0.12 ± 0.003 aC0.14 ± 0.002 aC
Lc1.69 ± 0.058 aA0.24 ± 0.028 bB0.15 ± 0.024 aC0.18 ± 0.061 aBC0.13 ± 0.017 aC
Lg2.00 ± 0.449 aA0.26 ± 0.089 abB0.21 ± 0.052 aB0.19 ± 0.046 aB0.15 ± 0.010 aB
Hexanoic acid, ethyl esterC2.57 ± 0.439 aA0.79 ± 0.233 aB0.54 ± 0.069 abB0.43 ± 0.042 aB0.53 ± 0.090 aB
Lc2.08 ± 0.057 aA0.57 ± 0.058 aB0.40 ± 0.067 bC0.46 ± 0.148 aBC0.32 ± 0.032 bC
Lg2.61 ± 0.856 aA0.69 ± 0.130 aB0.66 ± 0.158 aB0.58 ± 0.113 aB0.56 ± 0.050 aB
Octanoic acid, ethyl esterC1.85 ± 0.305 aA0.40 ± 0.087 aB0.41 ± 0.030 aB0.41 ± 0.018 aB0.49 ± 0.053 aB
Lc1.60 ± 0.134 aA0.42 ± 0.044 aB0.40 ± 0.041 aB0.35 ± 0.040 bB0.35 ± 0.028 bB
Lg1.97 ± 0.757 aA0.42 ± 0.038 aB0.36 ± 0.055 aB0.36 ± 0.032 abB0.45 ± 0.040 aB
Decanoic acid, ethyl esterC2.18 ± 0.258 bA0.56 ± 0.135 aB0.62 ± 0.053 aB0.65 ± 0.030 aB0.64 ± 0.073 aB
Lc2.79 ± 0.577 abA0.65 ± 0.075 aB0.68 ± 0.102 aB0.53 ± 0.044 bB0.45 ± 0.094 bB
Lg2.97 ± 0.856 aA0.62 ± 0.065 aB0.48 ± 0.058 bB0.52 ± 0.051 bB0.56 ± 0.111 abB
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl esterC0.18 ± 0.025 an.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Lc0.21 ± 0.044 an.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Lg0.24 ± 0.069 an.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
1-butanol, 3-methyl-, acetateC0.37 ± 0.015 aA0.37 ± 0.035 aA0.28 ± 0.043 abAB0.23 ± 0.042 aB0.33 ± 0.093 aAB
Lc0.35 ± 0.039 aA0.27 ± 0.065 bAB0.18 ± 0.025 bB0.19 ± 0.095 aB0.19 ± 0.025 bB
Lg0.37 ± 0.027 aA0.27 ± 0.046 bA0.34 ± 0.087 aA0.30 ± 0.099 aA0.35 ± 0.025 aA
Others compounds
1,5,9-decatriene, 2,3,5,8-tetramethyl-C0.60 ± 0.089 bC0.61 ± 0.108 bC0.77 ± 0.048 abAB0.89 ± 0.025 aA0.67 ± 0.023 aBC
Lc0.71 ± 0.084 abAB0.85 ± 0.068 aA0.85 ± 0.073 aA0.70 ± 0.051 bAB0.64 ± 0.133 aB
Lg0.76 ± 0.017 aAB0.80 ± 0.053 aA0.68 ± 0.032 bB0.74 ± 0.048 bAB0.66 ± 0.089 aB
Dimethyl etherC29.18 ± 3.598 aA5.55 ± 3.239 aB1.39 ± 0.562 aBC1.18 ± 0.068 abBC0.66 ± 0.278 bBC
Lc31.91 ± 1.945 aA3.78 ± 0.655 aB1.30 ± 0.699 aC0.41 ± 0.075 bC0.25 ± 0.093 cC
Lg31.42 ± 0.338 aA3.50 ± 1.693 aB1.63 ± 0.826 aC1.75 ± 0.689 aBC1.50 ± 0.080 aC
Trimethyl-pyrazineCn.d.n.d.0.13 ± 0.009 B0.14 ± 0.012 B0.42 ± 0.129 abA
Lcn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.68 ± 0.099 a
Lgn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.28 ± 0.081 b
2,5-dimethyl-pyrazineCn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.18 ± 0.007 a
Lcn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.37 ± 0.054 a
Lgn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.0.15 ± 0.008 a
Dimethyl disulfideC0.15 ± 0.020 aB0.52 ± 0.085 aA0.36 ± 0.094 aAB0.21 ± 0.038 aB0.17 ± 0.006 aB
Lcn.d.0.50 ± 0.089 aA0.35 ± 0.011 aAB0.29 ± 0.022 aB0.16 ± 0.023 aB
Lgn.d.0.27 ± 0.044 bA0.16 ± 0.039 bB0.28 ± 0.082 aA0.14 ± 0.002 aB
Control (uninoculated batch), Lc (batch inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (batch inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Mean values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between batches at the same day and compound studied. The means with different capital letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between days at the same batch and compound studied. n.d. not detected.
Table 5. Values of instrumental texture (hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness and chewiness) and color parameters of “Torta del Casar” cheese at the end of the ripening process.
Table 5. Values of instrumental texture (hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness and chewiness) and color parameters of “Torta del Casar” cheese at the end of the ripening process.
ParametersBatches
CLcLg
Hardness (N)5.05 ± 2.6635.18 ± 1.5794.44 ± 1.702
Adhesiveness (N/s)−0.36 ± 0.192−0.55 ± 0.312−0.47 ± 0.262
Springiness0.74 ± 0.0520.76 ± 0.0680.75 ± 0.079
Cohesiveness0.64 ± 0.0490.64 ± 0.0330.65 ± 0.039
Chewiness (N)2.66 ± 0.8312.57 ± 0.8852.54 ± 0.828
CIE L*101.09 ± 6.250100.51 ± 2.73097.11 ± 3.740 *
CIE a*−1.43 ± 0.859−1.26 ± 0.920−1.72 ± 0.640
CIE b*5.49 ± 2.5106.26 ± 1.1905.17 ± 2.211
C (uninoculated batch), Lc (inoculated with Lacticaseibacillus casei) and Lg (inoculated with Lactococcus garvieae). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to control batch.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martín, I.; Rodríguez, A.; García, C.; Córdoba, J.J. Evolution of Volatile Compounds during Ripening and Final Sensory Changes of Traditional Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese “Torta del Casar” Maturated with Selected Protective Lactic Acid Bacteria. Foods 2022, 11, 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172658

AMA Style

Martín I, Rodríguez A, García C, Córdoba JJ. Evolution of Volatile Compounds during Ripening and Final Sensory Changes of Traditional Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese “Torta del Casar” Maturated with Selected Protective Lactic Acid Bacteria. Foods. 2022; 11(17):2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172658

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martín, Irene, Alicia Rodríguez, Carmen García, and Juan J. Córdoba. 2022. "Evolution of Volatile Compounds during Ripening and Final Sensory Changes of Traditional Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese “Torta del Casar” Maturated with Selected Protective Lactic Acid Bacteria" Foods 11, no. 17: 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172658

APA Style

Martín, I., Rodríguez, A., García, C., & Córdoba, J. J. (2022). Evolution of Volatile Compounds during Ripening and Final Sensory Changes of Traditional Raw Ewe’s Milk Cheese “Torta del Casar” Maturated with Selected Protective Lactic Acid Bacteria. Foods, 11(17), 2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172658

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop