Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Oil Extraction from Rice Bran with Mixed Solvent Using Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization of Sugarcane Milling System Operations Based on a Deep Data-Driven Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioaccessibility and Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus sp. to Enhance Nham Protein Hydrolysates in Thai Fermented Sausage

1
Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
5
Division of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani 12130, Thailand
6
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology, Tawan-Ok 20110, Thailand
7
Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(23), 3846; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233846
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutraceuticals, Functional Foods, and Novel Foods)

Abstract

:
The development of functional food products is increasingly gaining lots of interest and popularity among stakeholders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioaccessibility of three Lactobacillus sp. starter cultures, including Lacticaseibacillus casei KKU-KK1, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus KKU-KK2, and Lactobacillus acidophilus KKU-KK3, in order to enhance the performance of the probiotic potential of Nham protein hydrolysates in Thai fermented sausage using microencapsulation technology. Probiotic microcapsules were created from a novel wall material made up of a combination of glutinous rice flour and inulin through a freeze-drying process. Accordingly, the results of three formulations of Nham probiotic and spontaneous fermentation (control) characterized by their physicochemical and microbiological characteristics displayed a correlation between an increase in the amount of total acidity, the population of lactic acid bacteria, and the generated TCA-soluble peptides, while the pH and total soluble protein gradually decreased under proteolysis during the fermentation time. The fractionation of Nham protein hydrolysates (NPHs) was prepared using a microwave extraction process: NPH-nham1, NPH-nham2, and NPH-nham3 (10 mg/mL with fermentation time 114 h), exhibited the highest DPPH radical-scavenging activity and FRAP-reducing power capacity as well, compared to NPH-nhamcontrol at p < 0.05. Moreover, those NPHs peptides showed dose-dependent inhibiting of selected pathogenic bacteria (E. coli TISTR 073, S. aureus TISTR 029, and Ent. aerogenes TISTR 1540). Anti-microbial properties of NPHs peptides against gram-negative bacteria were higher than against gram-positive bacteria. In conclusion, the bioaccessibility of NPHs peptides was significantly enhanced by micro-encapsulation and showed a potential bioactive characteristic for developing into a probiotic agent.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Several microencapsulation techniques have shown promise for enhancing and preserving cell viability throughout production, fermentation, and gastrointestinal processes [1,2,3]. Due to the cell viability and the effectiveness of bioactive properties during fermentation, gastrointestinal processes were widely used with a freeze-drying technique (lyophilization), which is a traditional drying method for preserving starter cultures and probiotic microorganisms [1]. The advantage of this technique is that the low temperatures can reduce the cell damage of the sensitive microorganisms, compared with spray-drying at higher temperatures. Cryoprotectant materials must also be used with the freeze-drying method to ensure optimal cell protection [4,5]. The synergistic effect of food-grade cryoprotectants such as alginate, chitosan, cellulose, carrageenan, gelatin, and pectin were applied using various encapsulation technologies. It provided the best protection for the culture during storage [3,6]. In particular, the combination of the cryoprotectants from the glutinous rice flour (for a source of amylopectin) and inulin (as a prebiotic source) worked together as a wall material for encapsulation; a new formula to encapsulate the living microorganisms as well-known probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LABs) [7].
Probiotic bacteria are frequently encapsulated to increase their viability during processing and to transfer them to their intended locations in the gastrointestinal tract. Probiotics are utilized in pharmaceuticals, health supplements, and are used as a starter culture in various fermented products [3,8,9]. Probiotics are living microbes that have a positive impact on their host. Bifidobacterium and many kinds of LABs (Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus) are some of the most popular probiotics [1,2,3,10,11,12]. The different biological characteristics have been reported to increase resistance in the gastrointestinal tract against infection (antimicrobial activity); host immune system differentiation (antioxidant activity) and nutrition production are also benefits of the commensal gut microbiome [13]. Probiotic bacteria, such as Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum, have been used in the field of functional foods such as fermented meat or fish and other everyday products [14,15,16].
In terms of functional fermented meat, pork, or fish products with probiotic starter cultures, the fermentation process has increased and served as a source of functional material, for instance polyunsaturated fatty acids, polysaccharides, enzymes, and bioactive activity, particularly antioxidant and antimicrobial peptides [17]. The process has changed owing to the development of Nham probiotic products, which is a modified Thai-style fermented pork sausage traditionally made from minced pork, shredded cooked pork rind, salt, cooked rice or sticky rice, and garlic, mixed with probiotic LABs starter culture [14]. Proteolysis during the fermentation process breaks down the protein into small protein or peptide chains of approximately 2–20 amino acids called protein hydrolysates. Consequently, due to the different amino acids included in each chain, these peptides have had a variety of physiological functions in the host consumer, including antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [14,18,19,20].
Exploring bioactive peptides is another intriguing approach to creating meat products with useful properties. These useful substances are created by microbial activity and have antioxidant and cardioprotective properties. Regarding antioxidant activity, a recent study using L. plantarum in a fermented sausage showed that small peptides obtained from inoculated products were linked to increased antioxidant activity by various in vitro methods namely DPPH, ABTS radical-scavenging, and FRAP-reducing power capacities [21,22,23].
Therefore, the aims of this work were demonstrated using freeze-drying techniques for microencapsulation with different probiotic starter cultures consisting of L. casei KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. acidophilus KKU-KK3, and were coated with a combination of glutinous rice flour and inulin as a wall material. The microstructures’ morphology and encapsulation efficiency of the probiotic-encapsulated powder were categorized by their physical and morphological characteristics using a zeta potential analyzer, followed by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Each probiotic starter culture was used to ferment Nham for investigating physicochemical, microbiological, protein alteration, and bioactive properties. We focused on determining the antioxidant and antimicrobial peptides obtained from Nham protein hydrolysates (NPHs) during the fermentation process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganism and Culture Condition

The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in this study were Lacticaseibacillus casei KKU-KK1 (accession: MK032218), Lactiplantibacillus pentosus KKU-KK2 (accession: JQ288726), and Lactobacillus acidophilus KKU-KK3 (accession: MF372641). Three LAB strains were isolated from the plaa-som fermentation process after 72 h and were obtained from the previous study by Phupaboon et al. [20]. The primary information of each LAB investigated their probiotic properties, including their resistance to lysozyme, lower pH, and highest OX-bile salt, resulting from the antimicrobial activity determined against Escherichia coli TISTR 073, Staphylococcus aureus TISTR 029, Enterobacter aerogenes TISTR 1540, and Salmonella typhimurium TISTR 1470, as shown in the details below. All of them were reference strains obtained from the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR). Moreover, the strains characterized by biochemical and morphological characteristics were found to have gram-positive bacteria, a negative-catalase test, non-spore-forming bacilli shapes, and non-hemolyzed blood sheep agar. The molecular structure that was identified by 16S rDNA sequencing showed a high similarity index of 99%, when the sequence was aligned with the NCBT database at different accession numbers, as mentioned earlier.

2.2. Preparation of Culture Suspensions

Pure probiotic strains were maintained with a modified lactose-MRS medium, and were subcultured into MRS broth (Himedia™, Maharashtra, India), then incubated overnight at 37 °C. The supernatant was re-subcultured to upscale in 300 mL of MRS broth for 12 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 4 °C, 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and washed twice with normal saline solution. The cell pellets of each strain were resuspended with 10% (w/v) of sterile glutinous rice flour (GRF) solution (Erawan Elephant Glutinous Rice Flour, Chonburi, Thailand), which has an initial number of viable cells ≥ 1012 CFU/g for use in the encapsulation process by employing a freeze-drying technique [24].

2.3. Encapsulation of Probiotics Using the Freeze-Drying Technique

The encapsulation process of probiotics was slightly modified, according to [1,25], by the combination of wall materials between 10% (w/v) of sterile GRF solution and inulin-oligosaccharide from gallic extract (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For the probiotic-encapsulation process, each of the cell suspensions was mixed with the wall material using a ratio of 1: 0.5 (v/v) and gradually stirred until homogeneous. The lyophilization process under the probiotic-encapsulating technique was performed in the freeze dryer GAMMA 2-16 LSC (Martin Christ, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The condition-controlling aspect of the sample was frozen at −80 °C for 1 h and drying was carried out at −58 to −60 °C, followed by the pressure being lowered to 0.016 mbar overnight. The final lyophilizes were collected in a vacuum bag and stored at −20 °C until their probiotic potential was estimated and further used in the Nham fermentation experiment.

2.4. Estimation of Probiotic-Encapsulation with Probiotic Property

The survival rate of probiotic starter cultures throughout the encapsulation process was verified and confirmed the probiotic properties of the resistance of cells grown in different MRS conditions to growth index (GI) tract stresses and the antimicrobial activity against the bacterial indicators of E. coli, S. aureus, and Ent. aerogenes.

2.4.1. Growth of LAB in Different Lysozyme, pH, and Bile Conditions

The experiment followed a modified method according to [26] The assay was performed in MRS broth (Himedia™, Maharashtra, India), combined with 200 mg/mL lysozyme from egg white (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), or adjusted to pH 3.0 using 2 M of HCl/NaOH, or added with 3.0% w/v of OX-bile salt (Himedia™, Maharashtra, India). Briefly, one milligram of probiotic-encapsulated cultures lyophilized powder was cultured in MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Then, cell suspension was measured by optical density at 620 nm (OD620 = 0.8–0.9), approximately 6 log CFU/mL. The tests were performed using a sterile 96-well plate (GusLAB). The cell suspension of the LAB sample test was loaded into each well of the modified MRS broth (sample condition), or normal MRS broth (control condition). Microbial growth was evaluated, following an overnight period, with absorbance values at 620 nm using an iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The results were exhibited as percentage of GI, modified following the equation of [27].
GI = A b s s a m p l e A b s c o n t r o l × 100

2.4.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activity testing of probiotic-encapsulated cultures lyophilized powder against E. coli TISTR 073, S. aureus TISTR 029, and Ent. aerogenes TISTR 1540 was assayed using the swab paper disc method, according to the method of [28].
One milligram of their lyophilized powder was grown in the modified MRS broth supplemented with 0.2 % (w/v) dextrose (pH 6.0 ± 0.2), was inoculated with 1% (v/v) of an overnight culture, and incubated in anaerobic condition so as to rule out any inhibition due to hydrogen peroxide production at 37 °C for 18 h. The supernatants were harvested by centrifugation, sterilized by passing it through a 0.2 µm filter, and tested for antimicrobial activity against the strains of E. coli, S. aureus, and Ent. aerogenes using a paper disc diffusion method. Pathogen suspensions of approximately 0.2 mL (105–106 CFU/mL) after growing at 37 °C for 24 h in nutrient broth (Himedia™, Maharashtra, India) were spread with a sterile swap onto the surface of a nutrient agar. Then, 40 µL of each supernatant without the cells was dropped into the paper disc (7 mm diameter, Whatman), placed on the inoculated agar surfaces, with streptomycin discs (15 µg) used as a positive control. After the incubation, the plates measured the inhibition zone around a disc using calipers and expressed in millimeters (mm).

2.5. Cell Enumeration and Encapsulation Efficiency

The lyophilized powder examined the cell viability using the drop-plate method, as described in our earlier paper [20]. Viable cells determined by the drop-plate-counting method on MRS agar contained 1% (w/v) CaCO3 (KemAus, Cherrybrook, NSW, Australia) at the same growing conditions. The cell number was expressed as the mean value of triplicate measurements in the log CFU/g. Following this, the encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated in accordance with the following equation [1]:
E E   % = log C F U g   o f   e n c a p s u l a t e d   p o w d e r log C F U g   o f   i n i t i a l   s t a r t e r   i n   s u s p e n s i o n ×   100

2.6. Morphological Characterization

The microstructure and surface morphology of the probiotic microencapsulated samples or the dried cells (uncoated bacteria) were visualized using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), TESCAN MIRA (Cranberry Township, PA, USA). The procedure was affixed using double-sided adhesive metallic tape, and the materials was defeated by nitrogen gas following the surface layer sprayed by gold–palladium before observing the morphology under FE-SEM with a 15 kV accelerating voltage [2].

2.7. Nham Fermentation Using an Encapsulated-Probiotic Starter

Nham products were prepared according to the plaa-som traditional fermentation technique, as described in the method of Phupaboon et al. [20], with the same ingredients, except for changing whole fish to ground pork. The process comprised gradually mixing ground pork, salt, and an encapsulated probiotic starter, consisting of L. acidophilus KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. casei KKU-KK3 (with an initial cell viability at 107 CFU/g for each strain), using the different ratios followed by the Nham formulation as shown in Table 1. The resultant product included cooked sticky rice, cooked pork rind, mashed garlic, and some seasoning powder. The products (about 50 g) were firmly sealed after being extruded into plastic casings with a stuffing horn and were incubated at an ambient temperature for 12 h. After that, they were kept at 10 °C for 6 days to study the physiochemical properties and for the proteins to transform as they performed their bioactive peptide activities.

2.8. Physicochemical Analysis and LAB Count of Nham Products

The pH and total acidity were determined following the method of [29]. LAB counts (in the form of acid-producing bacteria) were performed according to the standard total viable counts using the drop-plate technique under culturing on an MRS-CaCO3 agar plate [20]. The single colonies were counted, and the results were calculated in the CFU/g log of samples at different fermentation times.
In addition, the protein changes based on the degree of hydrolysis between the amount of total water-soluble protein composition in the Nham were comparatively evaluated and were fractionated with the amount of 10% (w/v) Trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble peptide in accordance with the method of [14,30]. The total soluble and oligopeptide contents were analyzed using the 96-well plate method and were monitored using the modified method [19,20] All analyses were performed in triplicate and were expressed as mg/100 g samples and µmole of tyrosine/100 g samples, respectively.

2.9. Preparation of Nham Protein Hydrolysates

Briefly, the Nham protein hydrolysates (NPH) were extracted from the Nham sample at different times under optimal conditions through microwave-assisted hydrolysis (MAH) at 100W (the maximum temperature ≥ 55 °C) for 35 min. For this experiment, the treatment was selected with the highest antioxidant capacity via microwave electronic transfer. The supernatants were separated by filtration and the insoluble protein was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, 4 °C for 5 min. Then, the supernatant of each NPH was lyophilized using the speed-vacuum centrifuge (SpeedVac, Thermo Scientific, Boston, MA, USA), followed by storage at 4 °C to analyze the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [31,32].

2.10. Antioxidant Activity of NPHs

The antioxidant activity was determined using two methods consisting of DPPH radical-scavenging activity [33] and FRAP-reducing power capacity [34] by using a modified 96-well microplate assay via a PerkinElmer microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA, USA), the procedure outlined by [20]. The concentration of each lyophilized NPHs power (approximately 10 mg/mL) was dissolved in methanol solution and was examined for the antioxidative capacity, read at 490 and 595 nm. All analyses were performed in triplicate and were expressed separately as the percentage of DPPH radical-scavenging inhibition and as mmol Trolox equivalent (TROE/g) samples.

2.11. Antimicrobial Activity of NPHs

The selected highest antioxidant activity of sterilized NPHs hydrolysate fractions at 114 h was performed using antimicrobial activity testing according to the method described by [18]. Then, the antimicrobial activity testing of their sterilized hydrolysate was evaluated by the resultant four indicator pathogen bacteria, including E. coli, S. aureus, Ent. aerogenes, and Salmonella typhimurium TISTR 1470, as previously mentioned in Section 2.4 [28].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All data were reported for statistical analysis as mean ± standard deviation of measurements made in triplicate. To ascertain the statistical significance of the observed variations in means, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05) with IBM SPSS-KKU Statistics Version 27.0 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Probiotic Characteristics of the Starter

The tolerance of three probiotic bacteria, including L. casei KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. acidophilus KKU-KK3, to digestive tract stress was investigated in order to find the best type of LAB, isolated from different types of fermented fish (plaa-som) and pork (Nham). All probiotic strains were grown in circumstances that closely resembled those that would affect the survival of ingested microbes as they traveled through the digestive system. We have considered three important variables: the impact of lysozyme, acidified pH levels, and the effect of bile salts following the antimicrobial activity testing against E. coli, S. aureus, and Ent. aerogenes (Table 2). The properties of the probiotic strain were evaluated in two stages, including the probiotic potential before the encapsulation step and their potential after the encapsulation step. The survival rate of each strain was analyzed by the GI measurements with an optical density index of 620 nm. The effect of the resistance with lysozyme in low pH and high bile salt conditions had no pronounced effect on the cell viability of each strain in both stages of the before and after encapsulation experiment. The survival rates of those probiotic potentials before the encapsulation process were lowest than after the process which is summarized in Table 2. Lysozyme results were reported in the ranges of (70.2–76.6%), compared to (58.5–70.4%) after encapsulation. The results of the acidity and bile salt tolerances showed the highest of the survival rates at range (65.0 to 85.3%) and (60.2 to 75.2%), respectively, compared to the data of acidity (50.3 to 62.8%) and bile salt (50.1 to 65.6%) after the encapsulation process. In addition, the probiotic strains of KKU-KK1, KKU-KK3, and KKU-KK2 showed higher antimicrobial activity against potential human pathogens including (E. coli, S. aureus and Ent. aeruginosa) after the process of encapsulation than before the process. The different inhibition zones of each strain are presented in Table 2. Interestingly, those probiotic strains are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) following the “Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food” with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and/or World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). Therefore, these findings correlate with the FAO/WHO recommendations, evaluating probiotics according to a variety of factors, including their capacity to adhere to epithelial tissues, their ability to withstand unfavorable conditions in the human body, their antibacterial activity, and safety for usage [10,35]. A considerable amount of research has been published on LAB, which typically tolerates high salt concentrations and lower pH at 3.0 in the intestinal tract. By enabling the bacteria’s metabolism to start working, acid is produced, further preventing the growth of undesirable species [10]. The relationship between acid and bile salt tolerance has been widely investigated as a crucial element in LAB’s survival and digestive tract expansion. The concentrations of bile salt must be present in 0.3% (w/v) or less when choosing probiotic species for usage in humans [10,36,37,38]. Recently, in vitro studies have suggested that the production of antibacterial compounds, such as organic acids, free fatty acids, ammonia, diacetyl, hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins, and lactic acid bacteria, has been helpful in boosting bacterial interference. Many genera of the Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and other probiotic strains, including Saccharomyces, Bacillus, and Escherichia, were created, including hydrogen peroxide and a secondary metabolite of bacteriocins. The antimicrobial effect is based on the oxidative characteristics that cause permanent alterations in the microbial cell membrane [10,11,39]. Additionally, probiotics have been shown to provide advantages, including direct suppression of harmful bacteria and enhancements in the functionality of the host immune system [13].
The majority of results of this investigation also showed that, after being microencapsulated, microbial loss caused by bile salts and low pH during simulated digestion was lessened. Similar results were observed when L. casei ATCC 393 was extruded into a mixture of pea protein isolate, alginate, and powdered skimmed milk, to act as wall material in a comparable experiment. Additionally, a pork sausage with this combination of protective substance and probiotic showed better defense against microbial deterioration [17].

3.2. Effects of GRF-Inulin Microparticles on Encapsulation Efficiency and Morphological Characteristics

Table 2 shows that the cell viability of the three probiotic starter cultures at different stages was no different (p < 0.05) in the initial cell suspension, and after their cell is encapsulated with a combination of GRF-inulin as a wall material using freeze-dying and storage at −20 °C of individual LAB, it contained a log of 12.5 to 12.8 CFU/g. Additionally, the encapsulation process preserved the cell viability yields for the carriers prepared using the freeze-drying process (Table 2). The freeze-drying process has proven to be very efficient for carriers with GRF-inulin, and the encapsulation efficiency of all three encapsulated starter cultures was steady at 100%, which did not cause the death of these probiotic strains (p < 0.05). The results of the study showed that the encapsulation efficiency was 100% of each sample; it was also possible to describe in Figure 1a–c the cells encapsulated by the GRF-inulin as wall material after using the freeze-drying process. However, there are no recent studies on the utilization of GRF in combination with the increasing survival of LAB by prebiotic nutrition with inulin in fermented food products. Interestingly, those descriptions show that the cells were also coated with a carbohydrate solution as a carbon source, and the super nitrogen nutrient sources, especially inulin, are a prebiotic or oligosaccharide, which enhanced the benefits of cell survival in stress conditions. All the encapsulated probiotics showed a higher protection and stability from freeze-drying. Previous studies have reported that encapsulated probiotic starter cultures were used with different wall materials, such as the protein components: whey, skimmed milk, whey-based protein, and other constructions, including gum arabic, starch, maltodextrin, inulin, sodium alginate, calcium alginate, and bacterial cellulose (nata) throughout the freeze-drying technique [1,2,40]. There was a cell viability after the freeze-drying process ranging from 107 to 109 CFU/g, which resulted in various amounts of encapsulation capacity in the range of 67% to 88%, based on the capacity of encapsulants [1,5]. According to another author, [1,4], a combination of carbohydrates and proteins would provide the greatest formulation for cell preservation during the freeze-drying process, because it would engage the cell membrane and prevent cell death.
The physical and morphological characteristics of the surface charge (zeta potential) and size distribution were referred to in Table 3 and Figure 1a–c. Both characteristics of the three encapsulated probiotic starter cultures formulated by the freeze-drying technique have not been significant (p < 0.05). The size structure and zeta potential had an average in the range of −43.8 to −44.6 mV and 10.3 to 10.8 µm, respectively (Table 3), obtained from dried GRF-inulin encapsulated by the three probiotic starter cultures. The microstructure and surface morphology of the GRF-inulin encapsulated with the probiotic starter culture were observed under an SEM microscope, as shown in Figure 1a–c. The micrographs of the surface of the encapsulated probiotic starter particle after freeze-drying retain a square and slightly rounded shape in comparison with the unencapsulated cell, which showed rod-shaped or bacilli cells (Figure 1d). Similarly, the literature recommends a carrier size of less than 100 µm, which is large enough to cover the probiotic cells, but, on the other hand, has little impact on the food’s textural qualities once it is used [6]. Another argument suggests that low-moisture content in a particle can decrease its size, which has no effect on the viability of the encapsulated culture using the freeze-drying technique [1]. Numerous studies have attempted to explain the zeta potential type of encapsulant obtained from whey proteins combined with maltodextrin and fructo-oligosaccharide using a spray and/or freeze-drying process. This was limited to a range of +30 mV and −30 mV, indicating their outstanding stability, which motivated a move towards their use in food processing [6].

3.3. Physicochemical and Microbiological Characteristics of Nham Probiotic through Encapsulated Lactobacillus Starter Fermentation

This study investigated Nham probiotic inoculated with the different encapsulated Lactobacillus species, L. casei KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. acidophilus KKU-KK3, by mixing the starter culture at various ratios comprising Nham-1 (1:1:2), Nham-2 (2:1:2), Nham-3 (1:2:2), and compared with a Nham-control formulation.
During the fermentation time in this study, the optimal condition suitable for consumption after fermentation was observed at 72 h, and the time was increased to 114 h for investigation of the activity of bioactive compounds. Three Nham formulations were inoculated with different Lactobacillus species via encapsulated probiotic starter cultures consisting of Nham-1, Nham-2, Nham-3, and additional Nham-control. The results exhibited a lower pH and higher TA in the LAB population than in the control experiment, as shown in Figure 2a,b. The pH gradually decreased on average from 6.43 to 6.48 and 4.32 to 4.48 within 0 to 114 h for the control, Nham-1, Nham-2, and Nham-3, respectively. The co-relationship between the TA production and the amount of LAB counts significantly increased depending on the inoculation level and fermentation period. All Nham probiotics formulated by the encapsulated-Lactobacillus starter culture found the TA increase from 0.02 to 0.47 (% w/w) and also LAB counts increased from log 7.69 to log 9.60 CFU/g during the initial stage to final fermentation time. Similarly, fermented pork (Nham) and fish (plaa-som) products recommended that a pH at lower than 4.6, and the percentage (%) TA levels were limited to an amount not higher than 2.0 and 0.2 (% g/100 g sample), when compared with the standard of lactic acid and acetic acid along with the amount of LAB shown in ranges 107–109 CFU/g, which are appropriate as a safety measure for consumption [14,15,20,41,42,43].
In addition, the proteolysis activity was significantly affected by the protein changes obtained from the total water-soluble protein and the TCA-soluble peptide contents, which increased following the fermentation time (p < 0.05) (Figure 2c). The results of the total water-soluble protein content were steadily increased from 9.3 to 18.2 (mg/100 g sample) from the initiate fermentation until the final time at 114 h. Similarly, the amount of TCA-soluble peptide content reached 183.2, 172.6, 160.3 µmole Tyrosine/100 g sample for Nham-1, Nham-3, and Nham-2, respectively. In agreement with the results of the current study, several research findings into the sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar proteins in the Nham protein were digested by the action of both the acidic level and the enzymatic activity from the LAB as a producer during the fermentation process relating to short proteins, small peptides, or free amino acids [14,43]. Additionally, many studies have been reported using probiotic inoculum of Lactobacillus species with encapsulant materials, such as alginate, chitosan, gelatin, and whey protein through encapsulation techniques: spray-drying, extrusion, emulsion, and especially freeze-drying, to enhance the cell viability during fermentation and distribution in the gastrointestinal tract [3].

3.4. Antioxidant Activity of Lyophilized NPHs

The lyophilized NPHs were fractionated by microwave-assisted extraction, an extraction method which demonstrated the best antioxidant and antimicrobial activities presented in the research papers of [31,44].

3.4.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

Therefore, four lyophilized NPHs, including NPH-nham1, NPH-nham2, NPH-nham3, and NPH-control, evaluated the antioxidant activity in terms of DPPH radical-scavenging inhibition and FRAP-reducing power capacity. The results shown in Figure 3 (left) clearly indicate that all NPH hydrolysates tested exhibited high antioxidant activity against the DPPH reagent, and the scavenging activity of each hydrolysate increased with longer fermentation times. The different hydrolysates of NPH-nham1, NPH-nham3, and NPH-nham2 exhibited the highest DPPH radical-scavenging inhibition from more to less at 83.2, 72.6, and 60.3% at 10 mg/mL after fermentation at 114 h, while the lowest DPPH radical-scavenging activities were obtained with NPH-control (19.2% at the same concentration and fermentation times). The present findings seems to be consistent with other research which found that the DPPH scavenging activity increased with increasing concentrations followed by the final time of fermentation [18,19,20,45]. The results showed that these peptides of all hydrolysates had H+ donors that might combine with free radicals to turn them into more stable molecules and inhibit the radical chain reaction [46]. The changes in peptide length and the amino acid content of peptides seen in protein hydrolysates may be responsible for the variations in their capacity to scavenge free radicals. Exploring bioactive peptides is another intriguing approach to creating meat products with useful properties. These useful substances, which result from microbial action, have antioxidant properties. A recent investigation of L. plantarum CD101 in a fermented sausage showed that short peptides derived from their inoculated starter were connected to increased antioxidant activity by DPPH radical-scavenging activity [21,23]. According to [21], it was found that peptides with the highest DPPH radical-scavenging activity and amino acid sequences obtained 44 peptides, for example E-G-A-D-S-E-M-A-L-F-G-E-A-A-P-Y-L-R-K-S-E-K-E-V-G-K-N and E-D-T-N-A-T-P-G-M-V-C-D-N-G-S-G-L-V-K from the meat muscle protein changes of myosin-1 and actin during proteolytic fermentation.

3.4.2. FRAP-Reducing Power Capacity

The ferric reducing assay is regularly used to measure an antioxidant’s capacity to provide a free radical with an electron in the form of Fe3+ (ferricyanide complex) to Fe2+ (ferrous); the higher reducing power of each sample is better at donating electrons. In this assessment, the testing solution changes to a green and/or blue color, indicating that the higher reducing power of each hydrolysate gradually increases with fermentation time. Particularly, NPH-nham1 had the highest reducing power capacity of 73.7 mmole TROE/100 g sample at 10 mg/mL for 114 h, followed by the fraction of NPH-nham3 and NPH-nham2 inhibited at the 66.8 and 60.3 mmole TROE/100 g sample, respectively (Figure 3-right). This accords with our earlier observation, which showed that the highest FRAP-reducing power of the 70.1 µmole/mg fraction hydrolysate obtained the fraction of B2D5–3kDa-F1 purified from plaa-som fermentation with the additive pineapple enzymatic digestion [20]. A related study considered the antioxidant activity of sausages produced with a combination of L. plantarum CD101 and S. simulans NJ201 which results in a significant increase in the ferric reducing power and increases with the free radical scavenging of DPPH and ABTS activities [47]. Other research has reported that the peptide from sausage has the potential to inhibit the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme in a hypertensive and cardioprotective effect [17].
Additionally, much research has shown that peptides created from different fish protein hydrolysates function as potential antioxidants in terms of free radical-scavenging activity and reducing power capacity. As mentioned in the literature review, fish protein hydrolysates generates peptides using various enzyme sources, namely pepsin, trypsin, papain, alcalase, neutrase, pronase E, validase, and flavourzyme, which play a part in the proteolysis process. Some examples of these generated peptides were: sardine fish hydrolysate (L-Q-P-G-Q-G-Q-Q) [48], conger eel hydrolysate (L-G-L-N-G-D-D-V-N) [49], yellowfin sole protein hydrolysate (R-P-D-F-D-L-E-P-P-Y) [50], and pacific hake protein hydrolysate (P-L-F-Q-D-K-L-A-H-A-K and A-E-A-Q-K-Q-L-R) [51].

3.5. Antimicrobial Activity

The antibacterial activities of NPHs were evaluated against gram-negatives, such as E. coli, Ent. aerogenes, and Sal. typhimurium, beside the gram-positives of S. aureus bacteria. The antibacterial activity was assessed by evaluating the inhibition zone around the paper discs with a diameter of 7 mm. Interestingly, as can be seen in Table 4, NPH-nham1 exhibited a strong inhibitory activity against the four pathogenic bacteria of E. coli, Ent. aerogenes, Sal. typhimurium, and S. aureus in different clear zones of 22.0, 18.0, 17.0, and 16.0, respectively. In addition, NPH-nham2 and NPH-nham3 exerted significant inhibitory activity against all the indicator pathogens, while NPH-control showed inhibitory activity against only Sal. typhimurium. These findings are in accordance with other performance measurement systems that gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to antibacterial agents than gram-positive bacteria. In conclusion, NPH-nham1 and NPH-nham3 hydrolysates were discovered to have the most powerful antibacterial activity that is effective against the strain of E. coli, which is the main cause of food spoilage and also a cause of diarrhea in consumers. Additionally, the results are significant for S. typhi, Sal. typhimurium, B. cereus, and S. aureus, which are well known for producing a variety of enterotoxins that cause gastroenteritis and for being resistant to various phytochemical substances [52]. In general, fermented foods with antibacterial effects may be a result of either the peptides created during the breakdown of proteins or the bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria. The antibacterial spectrum of fermented hydrolysates was therefore shown to be mostly caused by the peptides present rather than the strain utilized [18]. Most results in fish antimicrobial peptides have found antibacterial or bacteriostatic effects against a variety of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens. The research of [22], who reported a novel antimicrobial peptide, ‘pelteobagrin’, isolated from the skin mucus of yellow catfish, shows bioactive peptides approximately 20 amino acids in length (G-K-L-N-L-F-L-S-R-L-E-I-L-K-L-F-V-G-A-L). The action of pelteobagrin displayed broad-spectrum activity against a variety of both pathogen microorganisms.

4. Conclusions

Overall, the current work demonstrated the in vitro probiotic test for resistance to the simulated human gastrointestinal tract and used high potential probiotics to ferment Nham (fermented pork sausage) through the encapsulation of probiotic starter cultures. This was verified in the in vitro part of the bioactive property test: through antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Therefore, it can be concluded that the effect of using encapsulated probiotic starter cultures during the fermentation of Nham between physicochemical and microbiological characteristics significantly changes the protein muscle in NPHs hydrolysates for enhancing the potential bioactive peptide, mainly antioxidant and antimicrobial peptides. Based on these findings, the Nham probiotic of each formulation was fermented by encapsulating three different Lactobacillus starter cultures to generate NPHs hydrolysates. These hydrolysates have the potential and ability to be used in the food-processing industry as a natural preservative against food-borne infections and also to enhance the bioactive compounds for consumers’ health and well-being.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P.; Data curation, Methodology, S.P. and P.K.; Formal analysis, S.P., P.K., F.J.H., and N.K.; Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, M.M., P.T., R.P., and B.P.; Funding acquisition, M.W.; Writing—original draft, S.P., F.J.H., and M.W.; Writing—review and editing, S.P., F.J.H., N.K., and M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the Fundamental Fund (FF) (No. 66A103000057), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation (MHESI), and Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to SY laboratory (SY Lab.) in the Lactic Acid Bacteria Utilization Research Group, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, and Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand for their support with the laboratory facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no ethical issue related with this article.

References

  1. Obradović, N.; Volić, M.; Nedović, V.; Rakin, M.; Bugarski, B. Microencapsulation of Probiotic Starter Culture in Protein–Carbohydrate Carriers Using Spray and Freeze-Drying Processes: Implementation in Whey-Based Beverages. J. Food Eng. 2022, 321, 110948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ann, E.Y.; Kim, Y.; Oh, S.; Imm, J.Y.; Park, D.J.; Han, K.S.; Kim, S.H. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 with Prebiotic Substrates Using a Hybridisation System. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huq, T.; Khan, A.; Khan, R.A.; Riedl, B.; Lacroix, M. Encapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria in Biopolymeric System. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Santivarangkna, C.; Kulozik, U.; Foerst, P. Inactivation Mechanisms of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures Preserved by Drying Processes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jagannath, A.; Raju, P.S.; Bawa, A.S. Comparative Evaluation of Bacterial Cellulose (Nata) as a Cryoprotectant and Carrier Support during the Freeze-Drying Process of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martín, M.J.; Lara-Villoslada, F.; Ruiz, M.A.; Morales, M.E. Microencapsulation of Bacteria: A Review of Different Technologies and Their Impact on the Probiotic Effects. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 27, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niamah, A.K.; Al-Sahlany, S.T.G.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Verma, D.K.; Thakur, M.; Singh, S.; Patel, A.R.; Aguilar, C.N.; Utama, G.L. Electro-Hydrodynamic Processing for Encapsulation of Probiotics: A Review on Recent Trends, Technological Development, Challenges and Future Prospect. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santos Monteiro, S.; Albertina, Y.; Beserra, S.; Miguel, H.; Oliveira, L.; De Bittencourt Pasquali, M.A. Production of Probiotic Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims f. Flavicarpa Deg.) Drink Using Lactobacillus reuteri and Microencapsulation via Spray Drying. Foods 2020, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Samedi, L.; Linton Charles, A. Viability of 4 Probiotic Bacteria Microencapsulated with Arrowroot Starch in the Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and Yoghurt. Foods 2019, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Aswathy, R.G.; Ismail, B.; John, R.P.; Nampoothiri, K.M. Evaluation of the Probiotic Characteristics of Newly Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 151, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernández De Palencia, P.; López, P.; Corbí, A.L.; Peláez, C.; Requena, T. Probiotic Strains: Survival under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions, In Vitro Adhesion to Caco-2 Cells and Effect on Cytokine Secretion. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 1475–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nedelcheva, P.; Denkova, Z.; Denev, P.; Slavchev, A.; Krastanov, A. Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus plantarum NBIMCC 2415 with Antioxidant Activity as a Starter Culture in the Production of Dried Fermented Meat Products. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2010, 24, 1624–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Silva, D.R.; Sardi, J.d.C.O.; Pitangui, N.d.S.; Roque, S.M.; da Silva, A.C.B.; Rosalen, P.L. Probiotics as an Alternative Antimicrobial Therapy: Current Reality and Future Directions. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 73, 104080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Visessanguan, W.; Benjakul, S.; Smitinont, T.; Kittikun, C.; Thepkasikul, P.; Panya, A. Changes in Microbiological, Biochemical and Physico-Chemical Properties of Nham Inoculated with Different Inoculum Levels of Lactobacillus curvatus. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 39, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paludan-Müller, C.; Madsen, M.; Sophanodora, P.; Gram, L.; Møller, P.L. Fermentation and Microflora of Plaa-Som, a Thai Fermented Fish Product Prepared with Different Salt Concentrations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 73, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohammadi, R.; Sohrabvandi, S.; Mohammad Mortazavian, A. The Starter Culture Characteristics of Probiotic Microorganisms in Fermented Milks. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Munekata, P.E.S.; Pateiro, M.; Tomasevic, I.; Domínguez, R.; da Silva Barretto, A.C.; Santos, E.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Functional Fermented Meat Products with Probiotics—A Review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 133, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jemil, I.; Jridi, M.; Nasri, R.; Ktari, N.; ben Slama-Ben Salem, R.; Mehiri, M.; Hajji, M.; Nasri, M. Functional, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties of Protein Hydrolysates Prepared from Fish Meat Fermented by Bacillus subtilis A26. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Phupaboon, S.; Piyatheerawong, W.; Yunchalard, S. Correlation of Antioxidant Activity and Protein Alteration of Silver BARB Protein Hydrolysates. Asia Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 25, APST-25-04-05. [Google Scholar]
  20. Phupaboon, S.; Punyauppa-Path, S.; Kontongdee, P.; Piyatheerawong, W.; Yunchalard, S. Development and Enhancement of Antioxidant Peptides from Spontaneous Plaa-Som Fermentation Co-Stimulated with Chiangrai Phulae Pineapple Enzymatic Reaction. Int. Food Res. J. 2022, 29, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luan, X.; Feng, M.; Sun, J. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on Antioxidant Activity in Fermented Sausage. Int. Food Res. J. 2021, 144, 110351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Su, Y. Isolation and Identification of Pelteobagrin, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from the Skin Mucus of Yellow Catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 158, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cao, C.C.; Feng, M.Q.; Sun, J.; Xu, X.L.; Zhou, G.H. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria with High Protease Activity from Fermented Sausages and Antioxidant Activity Assessment of Its Fermented Sausages. CYTA J. Food 2019, 17, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhao, M.; Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gänzle, M.; Yang, N.; Nisninari, K.; Fang, Y. Probiotic encapsulation in water-in-water emulsion via heteroprotein complex coacervation of type-A gelatin/sodium caseinate. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 105, 105790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Afzaal, M.; Saeed, F.; Ateeq, H.; Imran, A.; Yasmin, I.; Shahid, A.; Javed, A.; Sahid, Y.A.; Islan, F.; Ofoedu, C.E.; et al. Survivability of probiotics under hostile conditions as affected by prebiotic-based encapsulating materials. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 2044–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kimoto-Nira, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Nomura, M.; Sasaki, K.; Suzuki, C. Bile Resistance in Lactococcus lactis Strains Varies with Cellular Fatty Acid Composition: Analysis by Using Different Growth Media. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 131, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Blaszyk, M.; Holley, R.A. Interaction of Monolaurin, Eugenol and Sodium Citrate on Growth of Common Meat Spoilage and Pathogenic Organisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 39, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Phumkhachorn, P. Antimicrobial Activity of Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Oil against Salmonella enteritidis In Vitro and in Food. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. AOAC International. AOAC Guidelines for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical Methods for Dietary Supplements and Botanicals; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 2002; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein Measurement with the Folin-Phenol Reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ketnawa, S.; Wickramathilaka, M.; Liceaga, A.M. Changes on Antioxidant Activity of Microwave-Treated Protein Hydrolysates after Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion: Purification and Identification. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Phupaboon, S.; Matra, M.; Prommachart, R.; Totakul, P.; Supapong, C.; Wanapat, M. Extraction, Characterization, and Chitosan Microencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds from Cannabis sativa L., Cannabis indica L., and Mitragyna speiosa K. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Binsan, W.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Roytrakul, S.; Tanaka, M.; Kishimura, H. Antioxidative Activity of Mungoong, an Extract Paste, from the Cephalothorax of White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Food Chem. 2008, 106, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. de Melo Pereira, G.V.; de Oliveira Coelho, B.; Magalhães Júnior, A.I.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Soccol, C.R. How to Select a Probiotic? A Review and Update of Methods and Criteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 2060–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Heller, K.J. Probiotic Bacteria in Fermented Foods: Product Characteristics and Starter Organisms. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 374S–379S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kimoto-Nira, H.; Suzuki, C.; Sasaki, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Mizumachi, K. Survival of a Lactococcus lactis Strain Varies with Its Carbohydrate Preference under In Vitro Conditions Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 143, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ogunremi, O.R.; Sanni, A.I.; Agrawal, R. Probiotic Potentials of Yeasts Isolated from Some Cereal-Based Nigerian Traditional Fermented Food Products. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Phumkhachorn, P. Isolation and Preliminary Characterization of a Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum N014 Isolated from Nham, a Traditional Thai Fermented Pork. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Fernandes, R.V.D.B.; Borges, S.V.; Botrel, D.A. Gum Arabic/Starch/Maltodextrin/Inulin as Wall Materials on the Microencapsulation of Rosemary Essential Oil. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chadong, K.; Yunchalard, S.; Piyatheerawong, W. Physicochemical Characteristics and Protein Degradation during Fermentation of Plaa-Som, A Traditional Fermented Fish Product of North-Eastern Thailand. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2015, 14, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  42. Paludan-Müller, C.; Henrik Huss, H.; Gram, L. Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from a Thai Low-Salt Fermented Fish Product and the Role of Garlic as Substrate for Fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 46, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Visessanguan, W.; Benjakul, S.; Riebroy, S.; Thepkasikul, P. Changes in Composition and Functional Properties of Proteins and Their Contributions to Nham Characteristics. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ketnawa, S.; Martínez-Alvarez, O.; Benjakul, S.; Rawdkuen, S. Gelatin Hydrolysates from Farmed Giant Catfish Skin Using Alkaline Proteases and Its Antioxidative Function of Simulated Gastro-Intestinal Digestion. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ktari, N.; Jridi, M.; Bkhairia, I.; Sayari, N.; ben Salah, R.; Nasri, M. Functionalities and Antioxidant Properties of Protein Hydrolysates from Muscle of Zebra Blenny (Salaria basilisca) Obtained with Different Crude Protease Extracts. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 49, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khantaphant, S.; Benjakul, S. Comparative Study on the Proteases from Fish Pyloric Caeca and the Use for Production of Gelatin Hydrolysate with Antioxidative Activity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 151, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, D.; Feng, M.-q.; Sun, J.; Xu, X.-l.; Zhou, G.-h. Protein Degradation and Peptide Formation with Antioxidant Activity in Pork Protein Extracts Inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus simulans. Meat Sci. 2020, 160, 107958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bougatef, A.; Nedjar-Arroume, N.; Manni, L.; Ravallec, R.; Barkia, A.; Guillochon, D.; Nasri, M. Purification, and Identification of Novel Antioxidant Peptides from Enzymatic Hydrolysates of Sardinelle (Sardinella aurita) By-Products Proteins. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ranathunga, S.; Rajapakse, N.; Kim, S.K. Purification and Characterization of Antioxidative Peptide Derived from Muscle of Conger Eel (Conger myriaster). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 222, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jun, S.Y.; Park, P.J.; Jung, W.K.; Kim, S.K. Purification and Characterization of an Antioxidative Peptide from Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Yellowfin Sole (Limanda aspera) Frame Protein. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004, 219, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cheung, I.W.Y.; Cheung, L.K.Y.; Tan, N.Y.; Li-Chan, E.C.Y. The Role of Molecular Size in Antioxidant Activity of Peptide Fractions from Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus) Hydrolysates. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Doan, C.H.; Davidson, P.M. Growth and Production of Enterotoxin A by Staphylococcus aureus on “Home-Style” French Fries. J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FE-SEM micrographs of the different encapsulations of the Lactobacillus species starter culture, with components of GRF combined with inulin at a ratio of 1:1 (% w/v): (a) encapsulation of L. casei KKU-KK1, (b) encapsulation of L. pentosus KKU-KK2, (c) encapsulation of L. acidophilus KKU-KK1, and (d) un-encapsulation of mixed Lactobacillus sp. cell culture, respectively.
Figure 1. FE-SEM micrographs of the different encapsulations of the Lactobacillus species starter culture, with components of GRF combined with inulin at a ratio of 1:1 (% w/v): (a) encapsulation of L. casei KKU-KK1, (b) encapsulation of L. pentosus KKU-KK2, (c) encapsulation of L. acidophilus KKU-KK1, and (d) un-encapsulation of mixed Lactobacillus sp. cell culture, respectively.
Foods 11 03846 g001
Figure 2. The co-relationship between physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of the changes in pH and TA (a), and (b) LAB counts during each Nham probiotic fermentation with different Lactobacillus sp. Mean values ± SD (n = 3) of different Lactobacillus sp. with different letters (ac) for their properties during fermentation time.
Figure 2. The co-relationship between physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of the changes in pH and TA (a), and (b) LAB counts during each Nham probiotic fermentation with different Lactobacillus sp. Mean values ± SD (n = 3) of different Lactobacillus sp. with different letters (ac) for their properties during fermentation time.
Foods 11 03846 g002
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of different Nham protein hydrolysate fractions obtained during fermentation at different formulations, mixed with an encapsulated-Lactobacillus sp. starter. Different letters a,b,c in the same group indicate a significant difference by applying Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of different Nham protein hydrolysate fractions obtained during fermentation at different formulations, mixed with an encapsulated-Lactobacillus sp. starter. Different letters a,b,c in the same group indicate a significant difference by applying Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 03846 g003
Table 1. Formulation ratios of the probiotic starter encapsulation, consisting of L. casei KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. acidophilus KKU-KK3, for the Nham fermentation process.
Table 1. Formulation ratios of the probiotic starter encapsulation, consisting of L. casei KKU-KK1, L. pentosus KKU-KK2, and L. acidophilus KKU-KK3, for the Nham fermentation process.
FormulationMixing Ratio of Probiotic Starter Encapsulated PowderAmount Ratio [% (w/v)]
ControlSpontaneous fermentationno fill
Nham-1L. casei KKU-KK1: L. pentosus KKU-KK2: L. acidophilus KKU-KK31:1:2
Nham-2L. casei KKU-KK1: L. pentosus KKU-KK2: L. acidophilus KKU-KK32:1:2
Nham-3L. casei KKU-KK1: L. pentosus KKU-KK2: L. acidophilus KKU-KK31:2:2
Table 2. Probiotic characteristics, antimicrobial activities, and the percentage of survival rates of different Lactobacillus species of the before and after encapsulated probiotic starter cultures.
Table 2. Probiotic characteristics, antimicrobial activities, and the percentage of survival rates of different Lactobacillus species of the before and after encapsulated probiotic starter cultures.
Probiotic Strains(%) Survival Rate of Resistive Difference ConditionsAntimicrobial Activity (mm)
Lysozyme pH (3.0)Bile salt E. coliS. aureusEnt. aerogenes
The probiotic potential before encapsulation
KKU-KK176.685.375.217.0 19.8 19.4
KKU-KK270.265.060.29.7 12.3 18.0
KKU-KK375.865.268.016.2 11.5 7.7
The probiotic potential after encapsulation
KKU-KK170.462.865.618.9 20.8 20.6
KKU-KK258.550.350.112.4 16.4 18.5
KKU-KK362.461.860.416.6 12.2 11.3
Values are expressed in percentage (%) for survival rates while reported in (mm) for antimicrobial activity. For each column of the survival rates of probiotic testing on the cell viability under different conditions (before and after encapsulation process).
Table 3. The cell viability of the initial and later encapsulated probiotic starters and their encapsulation efficiency for maintaining cell survival using the freeze-drying technique.
Table 3. The cell viability of the initial and later encapsulated probiotic starters and their encapsulation efficiency for maintaining cell survival using the freeze-drying technique.
Probiotic StrainsEnumeration of Cell Viability (log CFU/g)Encapsulation Efficiency (%)Size (µm)Zeta (mV)
Initial Cell SuspensionAfter Encapsulated
KKU-KK112.5 ± 0.0 a12.5 ± 0.0 a100.0 ± 0.0 a10.8 ± 0.1 a−44.4 ± 0.3 a
KKU-KK212.7 ± 0.0 a12.7 ± 0.0 a100.0 ± 0.0 a10.3 ± 0.3 a−43.8 ± 0.2 a
KKU-KK312.8 ± 0.0 a12.8 ± 0.1 a100.0 ± 0.0 a10.5 ± 0.2 a−44.6 ± 0.0 a
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Each column gives the amount of cell viability at different stages, with the initial stage and later encapsulation stage related to the percentage of encapsulation efficiency with a different letter, a, indicating a different significance (p < 0.05 by Duncan’s test).
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of Nham protein hydrolysates from different fractions at the highest antioxidant activity.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of Nham protein hydrolysates from different fractions at the highest antioxidant activity.
NPHInhibition Diameter Zone of Antimicrobial Activity (mm)
E. coliS. aureusEnt. aerogenesSal. typhimurium
NPH-control8.0 ± 1.0 c8.0 ± 0.0 c7.0 ± 2.0 c-
NPH-nham122.0 ± 0.0 a16.0 ± 1.0 a18.0 ± 2.0 a17.0 ± 1.0 a
NPH-nham216.0 ± 1.0 b11.0 ± 3.0 b14.0 ± 1.0 b15.0 ± 2.0 c
NPH-nham320.0 ± 2.0 a,b13.0 ± 1.0 b15.0 ± 3.0 b16.0 ± 0.0 b
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Each column tests the antimicrobial activity with different letters, a, b, c, indicating a different significance (p < 0.05 by Duncan’s test). NPHs as Nham protein hydrolysates; (-) as no inhibition.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Phupaboon, S.; Kontongdee, P.; Hashim, F.J.; Kanpipit, N.; Matra, M.; Totakul, P.; Prommachart, R.; Phesatcha, B.; Wanapat, M. Bioaccessibility and Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus sp. to Enhance Nham Protein Hydrolysates in Thai Fermented Sausage. Foods 2022, 11, 3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233846

AMA Style

Phupaboon S, Kontongdee P, Hashim FJ, Kanpipit N, Matra M, Totakul P, Prommachart R, Phesatcha B, Wanapat M. Bioaccessibility and Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus sp. to Enhance Nham Protein Hydrolysates in Thai Fermented Sausage. Foods. 2022; 11(23):3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233846

Chicago/Turabian Style

Phupaboon, Srisan, Papatchaya Kontongdee, Farah J. Hashim, Nattawadee Kanpipit, Maharach Matra, Pajaree Totakul, Ronnachai Prommachart, Burarat Phesatcha, and Metha Wanapat. 2022. "Bioaccessibility and Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus sp. to Enhance Nham Protein Hydrolysates in Thai Fermented Sausage" Foods 11, no. 23: 3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233846

APA Style

Phupaboon, S., Kontongdee, P., Hashim, F. J., Kanpipit, N., Matra, M., Totakul, P., Prommachart, R., Phesatcha, B., & Wanapat, M. (2022). Bioaccessibility and Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus sp. to Enhance Nham Protein Hydrolysates in Thai Fermented Sausage. Foods, 11(23), 3846. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233846

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop