The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Sampling and Participant Recruitment
2.2. Interview Study Design
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Demographic Profile of Participants
3.2. Open Coding
3.3. Axial Coding
3.4. Selective Coding
3.4.1. External Reasons → Consumer Motives
3.4.2. Consumer Motives → Purchase Intention
3.4.3. Internal Reasons’ Moderation
3.4.4. Consumer Motives’ Mediation
3.5. Categories’ Saturation Test
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Future Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Outline of In-Depth Interview |
Part 1: Personal information |
The information including gender, age, career, and education level. |
Part 2: Questions about home cooking |
1. The way to purchase food material. Prompt: How to buy food material (online or offline)? How long does it take you to buy food material? How much does the family spend on the food materials each month? |
2. Arrangements for household chores related to cooking. Prompt: Who usually cooks? What is the approximate amount of time spent on cooking-related chores in a day? The differences between mid-week and weekend meals |
3. The skills related to home cooking. Prompt: Do you know food preparation method? Do you know how to cook? Do you have food-related knowledge? |
4. The advantages and disadvantages of home cooking. Prompt: What is your attitude towards cooking at home? |
Part 3: Questions about the pre-made dishes |
1. The knowledge of the pre-made dishes. Prompt: Do you know the pre-made dishes? When or how did you acquire knowledge of the pre-made dishes? What do you know about it? What is your attitude towards the pre-made dishes? |
2. The attitudes towards the pre-made dishes. Prompt: What do you think are the advantages of the pre-made dishes? What are the biggest barriers to purchasing it? Would you recommend others to buy it? |
3. Planning and shopping for the pre-made dishes. Prompt: How often do you ever purchase the pre-made dishes? Whether it is a spontaneous behavior or influenced by external factors? What are the main considerations for purchasing it? |
4. Other questions. Prompt: Whether people around you buy the pre-made dishes? What are their attitudes toward it? What do you think about the current development trend of the pre-made dishes industry? What are your comments or ideas for improvement in the pre-made dishes industry? |
References
- Jackson, P.; Viehoff, V. Reframing convenience food. Appetite 2016, 98, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imtiyaz, H.; Soni, P.; Yukongdi, V. Investigating the Role of Psychological, Social, Religious and Ethical Determinants on Consumers’ Purchase Intention and Consumption of Convenience Food. Foods 2021, 10, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hüppe, R.; Zander, K. Consumer Perspectives on Processing Technologies for Organic Food. Foods 2021, 10, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wooldridge, K.; Riley, M.D.; Hendrie, G.A. Growth of Ready Meals in Australian Supermarkets: Nutrient Composition, Price and Serving Size. Foods 2021, 10, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, Y.; Han, J. Sustainable Home Meal Replacement (HMR) Consumption in Korea: Exploring Service Strategies Using a Modified Importance-Performance Analysis. Foods 2022, 11, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Lee, K.; Lee, Y. Selection Attributes of Home Meal Replacement by Food-related Lifestyles of Single-person Households in South Korea. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 66, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theodorou, A.; Hatzithomas, L.; Fotiadis, T.; Diamantidis, A.; Gasteratos, A. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Consumer Behavior: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China’s Central Authorities. No. 1 Central Document for 2023. 2023. Available online: http://www.lswz.gov.cn/html/xinwen/2023-02/13/content_273655.shtml (accessed on 13 February 2023).
- Zhao, C.F.; Chen, S.J.; Li, W.B.; Yang, G.H.; Niu, W.; Hao, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.Z. Analysis of Issues in the Development of the Pre-prepared Dishes Sector. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 39, 104–109. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- People’s Daily Online Research institute. Pre-Made Dishes Industry Development Report. 2023. Available online: http://yjy.people.com.cn/n1/2023/0710/c440911-40031856.html (accessed on 11 July 2023).
- IiMedia Research. White Paper on the Development of China’s Prefabricated Vegetable Industry in 2022. 2023. Available online: https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/92015.html (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Imtiyaz, H.; Soni, P.; Yukongdi, V. Assessing the Consumers’ Purchase Intention and Consumption of Convenience Food in Emerging Economy: The Role of Physical Determinants. SAGE Open 2023, 13, 21582440221148434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahma, N.; Mäkelä, J.; Niva, M.; Ganskau, E.; Minina, V.N. Convenience food consumption in the Nordic countries and St. Petersburg Area. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bumbudsanpharoke, N.; Ko, S. Packaging technology for home meal replacement:Innovations and future prospective. Food Control 2022, 132, 108470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Lee, T.J.; Hong, W. Home Meal Replacement (Convenience Food) Consumption Behavior of Single-Member Households in Vietnam by Food Consumption Value. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botonaki, A.; Mattas, K. Revealing the values behind convenience food consumption. Appetite 2010, 55, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Jong, B.; Worsley, A.; Wang, W.C.; Sarmugam, R.; Pham, Q.; Februhartanty, J.; Ridley, S. Personal values, marketing attitudes and nutrition trust are associated with patronage of convenience food outlets in the Asia-Pacific region: A cross-sectional study. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2017, 36, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daniels, S.; Glorieux, I.; Minnen, J.; van Tienoven, T.P.; Weenas, D. Convenience on the menu? A typological conceptualization of family food expenditures and food-related time patterns. Soc. Sci. Res. 2015, 51, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stranieri, S.; Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite 2017, 116, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cattaneo, A.; Federighi, G.; Vaz, S. The Environmental Impact of Reducing Food Loss and Waste: A Critical Assessment. Food Policy 2021, 98, 101890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, D.A.; Gómez-García, R.; Vilas-Boas, A.A.; Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M.M. Management of Fruit Industrial By-Products-A Case Study on Circular Economy Approach. Molecules 2020, 25, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, C.; He, L.; Zhou, X.; Li, H.; Ren, Q.; Han, H.; Hu, S.; Su, S.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, J. Review of Emission Characteristics and Purification Methods of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Cooking Oil Fume. Processes 2023, 11, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, P. “Familial fictions: Families and food, convenience and care”. Eur. J. Mark. 2018, 52, 2512–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, A.; Wethal, U. ‘It’s just pølse’: Convenient meat consumption and reduction in Norway. Appetite 2023, 188, 106611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moran, A.J.; Khandpur, N.; Polacsek, M.; Rimm, E.B. What factors influence ultra-processed food purchases and consumption in households with children? A comparison between participants and non-participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Appetite 2019, 134, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Remnant, J.; Adams, J. The nutritional content and cost of supermarket ready-meals. Cross-sectional analysis. Appetite 2015, 92, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casini, L.; Boncinelli, F.; Contini, C.; Gerini, F.; Scozzafava, G.; Alfnes, F. Heterogeneous preferences with respect to food preparation time: Foodies and quickies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 71, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thienhirun, S.; Chung, S. Consumer Attitudes and Preferences toward Cross-Cultural Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Food. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2018, 24, 56–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbosa, A.A.; Moura, J.A.; Medeiros, D.D. Positioning of design elements on the packaging of frozen convenience food and consumers’ levels of attention: An experiment using pizza boxes. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 87, 104044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniels, S.; Glorieux, I. Convenience, food and family lives. A socio-typologicalstudy of household food expenditures in 21st-century Belgium. Appetite 2015, 94, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contini, C.; Boncinelli, F.; Gerini, F.; Scozzafava, G.; Casini, L. Investigating the role of personal and context-related factors in convenience foods consumption. Appetite 2018, 126, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, S.O.; Tuu, H.H. Time perspectives and convenience food consumption among teenagers in Vietnam: The dual role of hedonic and healthy eating values. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contini, C.; Boncinelli, F.; Marone, E.; Scozzafava, G.; Casini, L. Drivers of plant-based convenience foods consumption: Results of a multicomponent extension of the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 84, 103931–103939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joe, F.; Hair, J., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.G.; Kuppelwieser, V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y.; Gong, S. Hygienic food handling intention. An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Chinese cultural context. Food Control 2014, 42, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview; Sage Publications Inc.: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Charmaz, K.; Thornberg, R. The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2020, 18, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawlik, R. Methodological Aspects of Qualitative-Quantitative Analysis of Decision-Making Processes. Manag. Pro. Eng Rev. 2016, 7, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.L.; Bai, L.; Gong, S.L.; Huang, L. Determinants of consumer food safety self-protection behavior--an analysis using grounded theory. Food Control 2020, 113, 107198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Middleton, G.; Golley, R.K.; Patterson, K.A.; Coveney, J. The Family Meal Framework: A grounded theory study conceptualising the work that underpins the family meal. Appetite 2022, 175, 106071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaser, B.; Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Sociology Press Inc.: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, Q.; Lu, G. Factors influencing the satisfaction level of college students in China: Literature analysis based on grounded theory. Front. Psychol. 2023, 13, 1023420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’ Reilly, K.; Paper, D.; Marx, S. Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organ. Res. Methods 2012, 15, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charmaz, K.; Belgrave, L.L. Thinking About Data with Grounded Theory. Qual. Inq. 2019, 25, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaser, B. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis; Sociology Press Inc.: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers; Sage Publications Inc.: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Westaby, J.D. Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2005, 98, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Guo, Q.; Zhu, J.; Wang, T.; Hu, B. Structural model and characteristics of kindergarten teachers’ occupational beliefs in China: A grounded theory approach. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 976719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saunders, B.; Sim, J.; Kingstone, T.; Baker, S.; Waterfield, J.; Bartlam, B.; Burroughs, H.; Jinks, C. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual. Quant. 2018, 52, 1893–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hennink, M.; Kaiser, B.N. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022, 292, 114523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lorenz, B.A.; Langen, N. Determinants of how individuals choose, eat and waste: Providing common ground to enhance sustainable food consumption out-of-home. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2017, 42, 35–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braghieri, A.; Piazzolla, N.; Carlucci, A.; Bragaglio, A.; Napolitano, F. Sensory properties, consumer liking and choice determinants of Lucanian dry cured sausages. Meat Sci. 2016, 111, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, H.S.; Tibboel, C.J.; Stieger, M. Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 60, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mills, S.; White, M.; Brown, H.; Wrieden, W.; Kwasnicka, D.; Halligan, J.; Robalino, S.; Adams, J. Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies. Appetite 2017, 111, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, C.A.; Machado, P.P.; Louzada, M.L.D.C.; Levy, R.B.; Monteiro, C.A. Parents’ cooking skills confidence reduce children’s consumption of ultra-processed foods. Appetite 2020, 144, 104452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horning, M.L.; Fulkerson, J.A.; Friend, S.E.; Story, M. Reasons Parents Buy Prepackaged, Processed Meals: It Is More Complicated Than “I Don’t Have Time”. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2017, 49, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristic | n | % | Characteristic | n | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Age | ||||
Male | 19 | 37 | 18–24 | 6 | 12 |
Female | 32 | 63 | 25–34 | 22 | 43 |
Marital status | 35–44 | 7 | 14 | ||
Married | 18 | 35 | 45–54 | 13 | 25 |
Unmarried | 33 | 65 | 55 and above | 3 | 6 |
Education level: | Career | ||||
Less than high school | 6 | 12 | Student | 8 | 16 |
High school/Secondary | 4 | 8 | Professional and technical staff | 13 | 25 |
Junior college | 6 | 11 | Employees of enterprises or public institutions/public servant | 14 | 27 |
Bachelor’s degree | 20 | 39 | Social production service workers/life service workers | 6 | 12 |
Postgraduate | 15 | 30 | Unclassifiable person | 10 | 20 |
Initial Category | Original Concept |
---|---|
A1 Cooking skills | a1 the level of cooking skills; a2 ability to prepare food; and a3 common sense to cook |
A2 Food skills | a4 ability to shop and select ingredients; a5 ability to match different kinds of food; and a6 ability to read product labels |
A3 Cooking chores | a7 number of household members who can cook; a8 the length of cooking; a9 cooking experience; and a10 female cooking at home |
A4 Attitudes toward daily diet | a11 personal attitudes toward cooking; a12 pursuing fashion trends; and a13 foodie |
A5 Food quality | a14 ingredient list and nutrition labeling; a15 product ingredients and food material; a16 the net content of food; a17 edible method; a18 storage method; a19 date of production; a20 taste and flavor of production; and a21 sell-by date |
A6 External value | a22 brand perception; a23 packaging appeal; a24 price; and a25 diversity and uniqueness of product |
A7 Media campaign | a26 online advertising; a27 offline marketing |
A8 Word-of-mouth | a28 product evaluation; a29 product sales |
A9 Functional value | a30 save time; a31 save energy; a32 easy to preserve; a33 standardized taste of finished dishes; a34 no seasonal or regional restrictions; and a35 more affordable than takeout and restaurants |
A10 Emotional value | a36 relaxing; a37 enjoyable |
A11 Social value | a38 have face |
A12 Cognitive value | a39 satisfy curiosity or taste; a40 for a change in flavor or to satisfy a craving |
A13 Functional risk | a41 cannot satisfy all the family’s tastes; a42 hard to cook; a43 single flavor; a44 cannot replace a proper meal; a45 few varieties; and a46 poor quality of food |
A14 Physical risk | a47 need to control diet; a48 low nutritional value; a49 harmful to human health; a50 unbalanced meat–vegetable ratio; a51 unhygienic; and a52 unknown source of food material |
A15 Economic risk | a53 more expensive than home cooking |
A16 Psychological risk | a54 disappointing; a55 worried |
A17 Group effects | a56 purchased by people around; a57 social reaction; and a58 online group purchase |
A18 Normative obedience | a59 resistance from family elders; a60 be submissive |
A19 Cognitive | a61 knowledge of varieties, brands, and other information about PMDs; a62 the time of the first purchase |
A20 Affective | a63 it is good; a64 refuse to purchase; a65 indifferent to PMDs; and a66 no need to purchase PMDs |
A21 Willingness to purchase | a67 willing to purchase; a68 take a wait-and-see attitude; a69 unwilling to purchase; and a70 recommend others to purchase |
Main Category | Sub-Category | Initial Category | Relationship Connotation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Internal reasons | Subject characteristics | A1 Cooking skills | Cooking skills are a range of abilities to produce dishes with the help of physical means or mechanical equipment (e.g., cutting and stewing). | |
A2 Food skills | Food skills are the ability to select and prepare ingredients and food material based on the knowledge and skills necessary for preparing needs-based meals (e.g., shopping and balancing diet). | |||
A3 Cooking chores | This refers to the individual daily household chore related to cooking. | |||
A4 Attitudes to a daily diet | This refers to the individual daily dietary perceptions. | |||
External reasons | Product features | A5 Food internal quality | Inherent food characteristics of PMDs, including safety, health, reliability, convenience, etc. | |
A6 Food external value | Non-inherent food characteristics of PMDs, including uniqueness, diversity, marketability, etc. | |||
Environmental features | A7 Media campaign | Publicize PMDs through online and offline means, such as social media platforms, TV, posters, etc. | ||
A8 Word-of-mouth | Discussions and information related to the brand, products, services on the web, etc. | |||
Consumer motives | Perceived control | Perceived value | A9 Functional value | Perceived utility derived from the convenience and utility provided by product selection. |
A10 Emotional value | Perceptual utility derived from the sensation or emotion evoked by the choice of a product. | |||
A11 Social value | Perceived utility derived from associating with one or more social groups through product choice. It may lead to higher self-enjoyment, such as an increase in self-confidence and a sense of recognition by others. | |||
A12 Cognitive value | Perceptual utility resulting from the satisfaction of curiosity or novelty induced by the choice of a product. | |||
Perceived risk | A13 Functional risk | The likelihood that the products may be unfit for consumption, or may not function as expected. | ||
A14 Physical risk | The likelihood that the product will cause harm or pose a potential threat to an individual’s physical health. | |||
A15 Economic risk | The likelihood of monetary losses arising from the choice of a product. | |||
A16 Psychological risk | The likelihood of mental stress due to the choice of a product. | |||
Subjective norm | A17 Group effects | Influence on individuals from other individuals’ behaviors and attitudes in the social reference group. | ||
A18 Normative obedience | Individuals anticipate expectations from significant others or groups about whether they should perform a particular behavior, and individuals’ intentions about whether they are willing to conform to the expectations held by others. | |||
Attitude | A19 Cognitive | Cognition is a rational evaluation and an objective evaluation and awareness of a product based on the beliefs held by individuals about products’ attributes. | ||
A20 Affective | Emotion is a perceptual evaluation of a product based on an individual’s feelings and values. | |||
Intention | Consumer intention | A21 Willingness to purchase | Individuals’ psychological tendency to purchase PMDs products. |
Typical Relationship Structure | Relationship Structure Connotation |
---|---|
External reasons → Consumer motives | External reasons include the external environment and product characteristics, which directly affect the residents’ motives. |
Consumer motives → Purchase intention | Consumer motives involve subjective norm, attitude, and perceived control, which directly influence residents’ purchase intention. |
Internal reasons ↓ External reasons → Consumer motives | Subjective characteristics are internal reasons that influence the strength and direction of the relationship between external reasons and residents’ motives. |
External reasons → Consumer motives → Purchase intention | Consumer motives act as the mediator between external reasons and purchase intention. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xiong, Y.; Lin, X.; Wen, X.; Wang, Y.; Liang, W.; Xing, T. The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory. Foods 2023, 12, 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12203798
Xiong Y, Lin X, Wen X, Wang Y, Liang W, Xing T. The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory. Foods. 2023; 12(20):3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12203798
Chicago/Turabian StyleXiong, Yanling, Xiaoxi Lin, Xiaowei Wen, Yiqin Wang, Wenwen Liang, and Tianyang Xing. 2023. "The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory" Foods 12, no. 20: 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12203798
APA StyleXiong, Y., Lin, X., Wen, X., Wang, Y., Liang, W., & Xing, T. (2023). The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory. Foods, 12(20), 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12203798