Next Article in Journal
Microbial Level and Microbiota Change of Laver in Dried Laver Processing Line During Production Seasons
Previous Article in Journal
Enzymatic Degradation of Ochratoxin A: The Role of Ultra-Pure Water
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes: Analysis of Cupei from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar, One of the Four Traditional Renowned Vinegars in China

College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(3), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030398
Submission received: 15 November 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 26 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
The microbial community in vinegar has primarily been investigated by analyzing short reads to determine operational taxonomic units, but it is also crucial to identify metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). In this study, the microbial diversity and functionality in Sichuan Baoning vinegar were examined through deep metagenomic sequencing and metagenomic binning. Results revealed that the most prevalent phylum was Firmicutes, followed by Proteobacteria and unclassified Bacteria. The most abundant bacterial species was Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis, while Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the most prevalent fungal species. The predominant viral species were Hopescreekvirus LfeInf, Myoviridae sp., and Siphoviridae sp. A total of 1395 MAGs were reconstructed, with 660 of them annotated. The majority of MAGs resolved at the species level were attributed to Firmicutes (n = 308), with Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis being the most abundant. According to the average nucleotide identity values, 223 out of the 660 MAGs might represent novel species. The recovered MAGs exhibited biomarker genes indicative of the genetic potential to encode several important secondary metabolites. This study helps to uncover the microbial composition and functional potential of microbial genomes in Sichuan Baoning vinegar.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Vinegar is one of the most common acetic acid-diluted solution products consumed globally [1,2]. With a legacy spanning over 3000 years, Chinese cereal vinegar, produced mainly through solid-state fermentation, has become an essential component of Chinese culinary traditions due to its unique flavor [3]. The production process of cereal vinegar is highly distinctive, where the main ingredients—glutinous rice, sorghum, wheat bran, etc.—undergo multiple stages of fermentation, aging, and flavoring [4,5]. There are four traditional renowned vinegars in China: Shanxi aged vinegar, Zhenjiang aroma vinegar, Fujian Monascus vinegar, and Sichuan Baoning vinegar [6]. Sichuan Baoning vinegar is a representative type of Sichuan bran vinegar, known for its use of wheat bran as the primary ingredient. It is produced in various regions across Sichuan, each with distinct characteristics resulting from differences in processing techniques and local environments. The production process of Sichuan Baoning vinegar has previously been outlined in our report [7].
Cereal vinegar fermentation is heavily dependent on several microorganisms, such as molds, yeasts, lactic acid bacteria, and acetic acid bacteria. Both traditional culture methods [8,9] and culture-independent techniques [10,11] have been tried to investigate the microbiota present in vinegar fermentation. It is challenging to evaluate the microbial diversity in vinegar fermentation through isolation in culture media alone, leading to the prevalent application of high-throughput sequencing in recent years. However, identifying microorganisms in fermented foods through sequencing based on short reads (operational taxonomic units) has primarily relied on similarity searches in public databases, potentially resulting in inaccurate taxonomical attribution [12]. Additionally, it is important to note that the reference sequences may demonstrate varying functional traits compared to those found in vinegar, despite belonging to closely related phylogenetic groups [13].
Genome-resolved metagenomics, as a bioinformatics technique, facilitates the de novo assembly of almost complete genomes from metagenomic sequencing data [14]. This approach, focusing on genomes, proves valuable in investigating phylogenetic and metabolic diversity at the species or strain level, without the need for culture-dependent methods. To the best of our knowledge, detailed information about the core abundant microorganisms at the genome level and their functional characteristics in fermented food like vinegar is limited. In the present study, Cupei samples from Sichuan Baoning vinegar were employed for microbiota composition analysis using deep metagenomic sequencing. Metagenomic binning was then employed to construct metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), enhancing comprehension of the genomic characteristics and functions of key microorganisms in vinegar. We believe this report represents the most thorough investigation of MAGs linked to Sichuan Baoning vinegar.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

During the months of July and August 2022, samples of Cupei (the mixture of all the ingredients used for fermentation) were obtained from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar Co., Ltd. (Langzhong, Sichuan, China). Specifically, 297 samples were obtained from three fermentation ponds (21#, 29#, 30#) at various time points (days 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25) as per the method in our previous report [15]. On the same day, samples from each fermentation pond were mixed, and approximately 400 g of Cupei was aseptically sealed in sterile Ziplock bags, followed by transporting to our lab and freezing at −80 °C. Each sample was identified by the sampling day and the corresponding fermentation pond number (1 = 21#, 2 = 29#, 3 = 30#); for instance, BN05_1 indicated samples collected on day 5 from fermentation pond 21#.

2.2. DNA Extraction, Metagenomic Sequencing, Quality Control, and Taxonomic Analysis

The extraction of genomic DNA from each sample was carried out utilizing the E.Z.N.A.® stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Subsequently, the genomic DNA was fragmented to approximately 450 bp using the Covaris S220 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), followed by the construction of sequencing libraries with these fragments. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq X platform in the paired-end 150 bp mode.
The raw sequence, deposited with the China National Center for Bioinformation (accession number: PRJCA026508), was subjected to quality trimming using Trimmomatic (version: 0.36) [16] (ILLUMINACLIP:adapters.fa:2:30:10 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:75) to eliminate adaptor contaminants and low-quality reads. The processed reads were aligned with the human genome (version: hg19) using the BWA mem algorithm with specific parameters (-M -k 32 -t 16, http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/bwa.shtml (accessed on 6 May 2024)). The reads that were free from host–genome contamination and low-quality data were identified as clean reads and utilized for further analysis. Contig preparation (>500 bp), ORF (open reading frame) prediction (>60 bp), non-redundant gene catalog construction, and taxonomic annotations proceeded, as reported by Ren et al. [17]. Taxonomic abundances were normalized by calculating the proportion of reads for a particular taxon relative to the total bacterial 16S rRNA reads.

2.3. Genome Binning

The metagenomic binning of each sample was performed with reference to our previous report [13]. Briefly, MetaBAT2 (version: 2.11.1) [18] was employed with default parameters to recover MAGs from assembly contigs (>2500 bp) of metagenomic data in the Cupei. The quality of MAGs was evaluated using CheckM (version: 1.1.1) [19] to determine their completeness and contamination levels. Subsequently, the taxonomic classification of the obtained MAGs was conducted through GTDB-Tk (version: 1.3.0) with the GTDB-TK reference database (version: 202) and default settings [20]. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) for all the annotated MAGs was calculated using FastANI (version: 1.3.1) [21].

2.4. Gene Prediction and Annotation of Microbial Genomes

MAGs with ≥50% completeness and <10% contamination were selected and then de-replicated using dRep (https://github.com/MrOlm/drep (accessed on 6 May 2024)). Gene prediction of the de-replicated MAGs was performed using METAProdigal (version: 2.6.3). Characterization of MAGs was conducted according to the protein-coding genes identified by Glimmer (version: 3.02) [22]. The resulting amino acid sequences were compared to dbCAN HMMdb v8 using Hmmscan (version: 3.1b2) to identify carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZys) [23]. Furthermore, functional annotations were assigned by comparing the sequences to the KEGG pathway database and the eggNOG database through kofamscan (version: 1.2.0) [24] and eggnog-mapper (version: 5.0) [25], respectively. The putative secondary metabolites were analyzed from recovered genomes using AntiSMASH (antibiotics and secondary metabolite analysis shell) (version: 7.0) [26].

3. Results

3.1. Metagenomic Sequencing

After undergoing quality control filtering, 1189.57 Gbp of clean data (7,941,143,174 high-quality reads) was obtained, with an average of 36.05 Gbp of data (240,640,702.24 high-quality reads) per sample (Table S1). In total, 9,468,753 ORFs were identified across all samples, with an average length of 632.15 bp, and 4,208,515 contigs were obtained after filtering the contigs with a length less than 500 bp.

3.2. Microbiota Composition

In the taxonomical classification of sequences, Bacteria were the predominant domain, succeeded by Eukaryotes and Viruses (Figure 1A). The top six genera were Acetilactobacillus, Lactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus, Acetobacter, Weizmannia, and Lactiplantibacillus (Figure 1B). Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis was determined as the most prevalent species, followed by Lactobacillus amylovorus and Limosilactobacillus sp. (Figure 1C).
A total of 120 bacterial phyla, consisting of 3415 genera and 22,817 species, were identified in the analyzed samples (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The predominant bacterial genera observed were Acetilactobacillus, Lactobacillus, and Limosilactobacillus (Figure 3A), with Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis, Lactobacillus amylovorus, Limosilactobacillus sp., Lactobacillus acetotolerans, and Acetobacter pasteurianus being the most abundant species (Figure 3B). All but Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis and Limosilactobacillus sp. were obtained using conventional microbial cultivation methods [9]. Similarly, Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis and Lactobacillus acetotolerans were the top two species in Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar [27].
A total of 10 fungal phyla were identified in the analyzed samples, consisting of 609 genera and 1476 species (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The predominant fungal genera observed included Saccharomyces, Lichtheimia, and Pichia (Figure 3C), with the most abundant species being Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lichtheimia ramosa, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Patellaria atrata, and Circinella minor (Figure 3D). In contrast, in the process of alcohol and acetic acid fermentation in Shanxi aged vinegar, the predominant fungal genera were Saccharomyces and Saccharomycopsis [28]. A study on Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar revealed varying dominant fungal populations at different fermentation stages. Specifically, Wickerhamomyces and Saccharomyces dominated the starch saccharification and alcohol fermentation stages, respectively, while Alternaria, Fusarium, and Saccharomyces were predominant during acetic acid fermentation [27].
A total of 11 viral phyla, consisting of 302 genera and 869 species, were found in the analyzed samples (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The prevalent viral genera observed included Hopescreekvirus, Harbinvirus, and unclassified Siphoviridae (Figure 3E), with Hopescreekvirus LfeInf, Myoviridae sp., and Siphoviridae sp. being the predominant viral species (Figure 3F). Generally, the discussion of the viral community in vinegar fermentation has been limited, and our findings on viral composition demonstrated limited similarity to studies by Yu et al. [29].

3.3. Assembly of Draft Genomes

In the investigation of the genetic potential of microorganisms present in Cupei samples, metagenomic binning was conducted. Following contig assembly, a total of 1395 MAGs were reconstructed, with 336 classified as high-quality MAGs (completeness ≥ 90% and contamination ≤ 5%). The distribution of all the constructed MAGs across the 33 samples is detailed in Table S2. Taxonomic annotation of each MAG was carried out with GTDB-Tk, resulting in the annotation of 660 MAGs (Table S3).
A total of 658 MAGs were annotated to the class level, 658 to the order level, 658 to the family level, 627 to the genus level, and 433 to the species level. All annotated MAGs were affiliated with the domain Bacteria, with Firmicutes (n = 454) and Proteobacteria (n = 130) being the most prevalent phyla. Less abundant phyla included Bacteroidota (n = 41, all identified at the class level as Bacteroidia), Actinobacteriota (n = 25, all identified at the class level as Actinomycetia), Myxococcota (n = 7, all identified at the genus level as Labilithrix), and Deinococcota (n = 3, all identified at the genus level as Meiothermus). The Firmicutes group comprised the classes Bacilli (n = 451) and Negativicutes (n = 3), while Proteobacteria were predominantly represented by the class Alphaproteobacteria (n = 113), followed by Gammaproteobacteria (n = 17). According to the ANI values, 223 of these MAGs might be linked to novel species, with 31, 80, 30, and 26 novel species belonging to the family Amphibacillaceae, the genus Limosilactobacillus, the genus Bradyrhizobium, and the genus Lactobacillus, respectively.
The Firmicutes phylum accounted for the highest number of species-level resolved MAGs at 308, followed by Proteobacteria (n = 71), Actinobacteriota (n = 25), and Bacteroidota (n = 29). Within the phylum Firmicutes, specific MAGs were identified, including Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis (n = 33), Lactobacillus amylovorus (n = 32), Weizmannia coagulans (n = 31), and Lactobacillus acetotolerans (n = 30). In the phylum Proteobacteria, Acetobacter pomorum (n = 23) was the most abundant, followed by Acetobacter peroxydans (n = 13).

3.4. Functionality of Microbial Genomes

Upon de-replication of the 660 initially annotated MAGs, a final set of 90 MAGs was obtained. The relative abundance of MAGs in each sample was calculated using the quant_bins module in MetaWRAP, and a heatmap was created using Cloud Platform (http://www.cloud.biomicroclass.com/CloudPlatform (accessed on 6 May 2024)) (Figure S1). Additionally, a total of 251,224 genes were predicted through the METAProdigal tool.
The genetic potential of the 90 microbial genomes was analyzed. A total of 7134 genes were identified as participants in carbohydrate metabolism through CAZy database annotation, encompassing various CAZys such as carbohydrate esterases (CEs), glycosyltransferases (GTs), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), glycoside hydrolases (GHs), auxiliary activities (AAs), and carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs). GHs were the most prevalent enzymes, constituting 35.42% of all carbohydrate-metabolizing genes and comprising 105 distinct families. Following GHs, GTs were the second most abundant enzymes with 43 families, covering 29.38% of the total carbohydrate-metabolizing genes, followed by CEs with 15 families (20.54%) (Figure 4A). GHs, GTs, and CEs were found in various phyla, with GHs predominantly present in MAGs of Paenibacillus sp. and Chitinophaga sp., GTs primarily in MAGs of Burkholderia vietnamiensis, and CEs mainly in MAGs of Mycobacterium aubagnense.
As shown in Figure 4B, a total of 227,676 genes were annotated using the eggNOG database. The cluster of orthologous groups (COG) annotation (including 23 COG categories) highlighted that the majority of proteins identified in MAGs were linked to metabolism, with cellular processes and signaling, as well as information storage and processing ranking subsequently.
In total, 211,665 predicted genes underwent KEGG database annotation, with 67,415 unigenes associated with KEGG pathways. Among these, 42,267 unigenes (62.70%) were categorized under metabolism, representing the highest proportion. In addition, 10,957 unigenes (16.25%) were related to genetic information processing, 9411 unigenes (13.96%) to environmental information processing, 4385 unigenes (6.50%) to cellular processes, and 395 unigenes (0.59%) to organismal systems (Figure 4C). In the level 2 classification of the metabolism category, carbohydrate metabolism represented the highest percentage at 21.94%, with amino acid metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and nucleotide metabolism ranking next at 21.56%, 14.09%, and 11.07%, respectively (Figure 4D).
Among the 90 MAGs, 69 were found to contain 358 genes that have genetic potential to encode 40 different types of secondary metabolites (Table S4). The predominant types of secondary metabolites were terpene (68 genes), other unspecified ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide product (RiPP-like) (45 genes), non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) (39 genes), type III polyketides (T3PKs) (38 genes), redox-cofactor (22 genes), and arylpolyene (22 genes). Terpene is known as one of the key indicators of aroma quality in vinegar, and its encoding gene was present in 32 MAGs. MAGs of Chitinophaga sp. exhibited the highest number of terpene synthesis genes, followed by Streptomyces cacaoi. Additionally, MAGs of all eleven different Limosilactobacillus sp. as well as Limosilactobacillus pontis, Limosilactobacillus secaliphilus, and Limosilactobacillus panis had genetic potential to produce T3PKs, indicating the possible antimicrobial ability of these lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic bacteria [30].

4. Discussion

In our preliminary investigation, high-throughput amplicon sequencing and cultivation techniques were employed to assess the microbial diversity of Sichuan Baoning vinegar. However, our understanding of the microbial community at the species level remains quite limited. As is known, metagenomic sequencing enhances taxonomic resolution to the species or strain level and offers insights into potential functional information [31]. By employing in-depth metagenomic sequencing technology, this study examined the species-level microbial diversity present in Sichuan Baoning vinegar, with an average sample size of 36.05 Gbp. The analysis revealed a total of 26,241 species, with bacteria being the predominant group. Acetilactobacillus, Lactobacillus, and Limosilactobacillus were the most abundant genera, with the most prevalent species being Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis, Lactobacillus amylovorus, and Limosilactobacillus sp. (Figure 3). Previously, Lactobacillus was identified as the predominant genus [32]. However, recent taxonomic updates on lactic acid bacteria have led to the recognition of Acetilactobacillus [33]. Interestingly, the results reported by Han et al. [34] and Tong et al. [35] differed, potentially due to the use of varying types of Sichuan bran vinegar. In addition to the well-known Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lichtheimia ramose and Lichtheimia corymbifera were also predominant fungal species. Examination of microbial diversity at the species level will serve as a foundation for elucidating the key microorganisms engaged in the fermentation of Sichuan Baoning vinegar and for controlling fermentation procedures through the application of synergistic functional microbial consortia [36]. Notably, the fungal genus Aspergillus was not identified among the dominant microorganisms, a discrepancy from our previous outcomes of amplicon-based high-throughput sequencing [32]. This inconsistency may be attributed to variations in sample batches, DNA extraction, and sequencing methodologies.
Metagenomic binning techniques enable the reconstruction of high-quality MAGs from complex microbial communities, thereby enabling further exploration and utilization of microbial resources. In this study, 660 annotated MAGs were obtained by employing metagenomic binning, with 33 genomes identified as Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis. This microorganism plays a significant role in the production of vinegar and Baijiu [37]. However, research on the genomes and functionalities of Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis strains from different sources is limited and requires further exploration. The recovered MAGs demonstrated a variety of genetic potential, featuring biomarker genes indicative of the ability to encode various secondary metabolites, particularly terpene. This type of compound can play a crucial role in enhancing the flavor of vinegar [38].
This study uncovered several potential MAGs of new species, including the genera Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, when utilizing metagenomic binning and ANI analysis. The newly identified species may possess unique genetic and metabolic traits that could significantly impact vinegar fermentation and product quality. By analyzing the nutritional requirements of strains through MAG data, these strains may be isolated via cultureomics. Further research is needed to gain a comprehensive comprehension of their capabilities.
Viruses are ubiquitous across all ecosystems, infecting organisms ranging from prokaryotes to eukaryotes [39]. Bacteriophages, viruses that target bacteria, have been reported in various fermented products such as milks, vinegars, and vegetables [40]. Studies suggested that certain bacteriophages played a role in shaping bacterial community succession during fermentation, ultimately enhancing the quality and sensory properties of the final food product [41]. The predominant bacteriophage families detected in fermented foods included Siphoviridae, Podoviridae, and Myoviridae [42]. Similarly, Myoviridae sp. and Siphoviridae sp. were noted as prevalent viral species in Sichuan Baoning vinegar. However, it is essential to recognize that the analysis of viral composition in these environments relied heavily on metagenomic sequencing, which might exhibit bias towards the extraction of bacterial and fungal DNA. Notably, the metagenomes only allowed the identification of DNA viruses, and RNA viruses may be also present in Cupei. In addition, future detection of CRISPRs in the MAGs and exploration through phagenomics may offer a more thorough insight into the viral composition and function.

5. Conclusions

The present study examined the microbial community and its functional potential in Sichuan Baoning vinegar using metagenomic sequencing. Firmicutes was the most predominant phylum, with the top six genera identified as Acetilactobacillus, Lactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus, Acetobacter, Weizmannia, and Lactiplantibacillus. A total of 1395 MAGs were assembled through genomic binning, with 660 MAGs annotated using GTDB-Tk. The majority of species-level resolved MAGs were annotated as Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis (n = 33), Lactobacillus amylovorus (n = 32), Weizmannia coagulans (n = 31), and Lactobacillus acetotolerans (n = 30). The recovered MAGs showed biomarker genes indicative of the genetic potential to encode several secondary metabolites. Additionally, MAGs of new species were obtained, highlighting the need for further application of culturomics techniques to recover these strains from Cupei. This study contributes to the understanding of the microbiota in Cupei and offers insights into the fermentation of Sichuan Baoning vinegar.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14030398/s1, Figure S1: The abundance of de-replicated MAGs in Cupei. Each row represents a MAG and each column represents a sample. The color in the figure indicates the abundance of each MAG in that sample (log10 FPKM), ranging from blue (lower abundance) to red (higher abundance). Table S1: Metagenomic data obtained from Cupei; Table S2: The distribution of 1395 MAGs in Cupei; Table S3: Taxonomic annotation of MAGs using GTDB-Tk; Table S4: Prediction of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters from the MAGs using antiSMASH.

Author Contributions

J.W.: conceptualization, methodology, and data curation. N.Z., Q.L. and K.Z.: methodology and data curation. M.T., J.L., K.H. and S.C.: writing—original draft. S.L.: writing—review and editing, and supervision. A.L.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Department of Si-chuan Province (Nos. 2024NSFSC2079 and 2023ZHCG0081), Sichuan Province Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (S202310626057), Shuangzhi Plan of Si-chuan Agricultural University (2024ZYTS004), and Innovation and Demonstration of Industry and Education Integration in Feed Industrial Chain Transformation and Upgradation (Sichuan Province, China).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Xie, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, X.; Xia, T.; Yu, S.; Wang, M. Antioxidant activity of Chinese Shanxi aged vinegar and its correlation with polyphenols and flavonoids during the brewing process. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2479–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, L.; Wang, M.; Song, H.; Liang, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, D. Changes of microbial communities and metabolites in the fermentation of persimmon vinegar by bioaugmentation fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2024, 122, 104565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Al-Dalali, S.; Zheng, F.; Xu, B.; Abughoush, M.; Li, L.; Sun, B. Processing technologies and flavor analysis of Chinese cereal vinegar: A comprehensive review. Food Anal. Methods 2023, 16, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Melini, V.; Melini, F. Asian grain-based food products and the European scheme for food protected designations of origin: A critical analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Zhou, R.; Wu, C. Evaluating the feasibility of fermentation starter inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for improving acetoin and tetramethylpyrazine in Baoning bran vinegar. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 255, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ai, M.; Qiu, X.; Huang, J.; Wu, C.; Jin, Y.; Zhou, R. Characterizing the microbial diversity and major metabolites of Sichuan bran vinegar augmented by Monascus purpureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, A.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Li, Q.; He, L.; Chen, S.; Ao, X.; Yang, Y.; Zou, L.; Chen, R.; et al. Multiple rounds of Aspergillus niger biofortification confer relatively stable quality with minor changes of microbial community during industrial-scale Baoning vinegar production. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sengun, I.Y.; Kilic, G.; Charoenyingcharoen, P.; Yukphan, P.; Yamada, Y. Investigation of the microbiota associated with traditionally produced fruit vinegars with focus on acetic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, J.; Li, Q.; Hu, K.; Li, J.; Durán-Guerrero, E.; Liu, S.; Guo, M.; Liu, A. Microbial characterization of Sichuan Baoning vinegar: Lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria and yeasts. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, W.L.; Tong, S.G.; Yang, Z.Y.; Xiao, Y.Q.; Lv, X.C.; Weng, Q.; Yu, K.; Liu, G.R.; Luo, X.Q.; Wei, T.; et al. The dynamics of microbial community and flavor metabolites during the acetic acid fermentation of Hongqu aromatic vinegar. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yu, X.; Gu, C.; Guo, X.; Guo, R.; Zhu, L.; Qiu, X.; Chai, J.; Liu, F.; Feng, Z. Dynamic changes of microbiota and metabolite of traditional Hainan dregs vinegar during fermentation based on metagenomics and metabolomics. Food Chem. 2024, 444, 138641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Almeida, O.G.G.; De Martinis, E.C.P. Metagenome-assembled genomes contribute to unraveling of the microbiome of cocoa fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e00584-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, J.; Chen, L.; Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Jin, L.; He, X.; He, L.; Ao, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, A.; et al. Metagenome and analysis of metabolic potential of the microbial community in pit mud used for Chinese strong-flavor liquor production. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Liu, M.; Yang, J. Recovering metagenome-assembled genomes from shotgun metagenomic sequencing data: Methods, applications, challenges, and opportunities. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 260, 127023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, A.; Peng, Y.; Ao, X.; Pan, W.; Chen, S.; He, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, F.; Du, D.; Liu, S. Effects of Aspergillus niger biofortification on the microbial community and quality of Baoning vinegar. LWT 2020, 131, 109728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, F.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Tian, X.; Jiang, P.; Tan, B. Deciphering microbial diversity and functional codes of traditional fermented whole grain Tianpei from typical regions of China. Fermentation 2023, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, D.D.; Li, F.; Kirton, E.; Thomas, A.; Egan, R.; An, H.; Wang, Z. MetaBAT 2: An adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaumeil, P.A.; Mussig, A.J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Parks, D.H. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Delcher, A.L.; Bratke, K.A.; Powers, E.C.; Salzberg, S.L. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, H.; Yohe, T.; Huang, L.; Entwistle, S.; Wu, P.; Yang, Z.; Busk, P.K.; Xu, Y.; Yin, Y. dbCAN2: A meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W95–W101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.; Reitz, Z.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.; Metcalf, W.; Helfrich, E.; et al. antiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, T.; Lu, Z.M.; Peng, M.Y.; Liu, Z.F.; Chai, L.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Shi, J.S.; Li, Q.; Xu, Z.H. Combined effects of fermentation starters and environmental factors on the microbial community assembly and flavor formation of Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar. Food Res. Int. 2022, 152, 110900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nie, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhang, X.; Song, J.; Xia, M.; Wang, M. Unraveling the correlation between microbiota succession and metabolite changes in traditional Shanxi aged vinegar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Chen, J.; Yu, Y. Metagenomics of virus diversities in solid-state brewing process of traditional Chinese vinegar. Foods 2022, 11, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, S.; Bansal, K.; Sethi, S. Comparative genomics analysis of genus Leuconostoc resolves its taxonomy and elucidates its biotechnological importance. Food Microbiol. 2022, 106, 104039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, Y.X.; Qin, Y.; Chen, T.; Lu, M.; Qian, X.; Guo, X.; Bai, Y. A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data. Protein Cell 2021, 12, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, A.; Pan, W.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Li, Q.; He, L.; Chen, S.; Hu, K.; Hu, X.; Han, G.; et al. Seasonal dynamics of microbiota and physicochemical indices in the industrial-scale fermentation of Sichuan Baoning vinegar. Food Chem. X 2022, 16, 100452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; O’Toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Han, D.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Chen, K.; Dai, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, K.; Liu, P.; et al. Metagenomics profiling of the microbial community and functional differences in solid-state fermentation vinegar starter (seed Pei) from different Chinese regions. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1389737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tong, W.; Chen, G.; Yu, H.; Wang, X.; Xue, R.; Yang, Y.; Luo, H.; Huang, D. Dynamic changes and correlation of organic acids, physicochemical properties, and microbial communities during fermentation of Sichuan bran vinegar. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 132, 106355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fan, J.; Qu, G.; Wang, D.; Chen, J.; Du, G.; Fang, F. Synergistic fermentation with functional microorganisms improves safety and quality of traditional Chinese fermented foods. Foods 2023, 12, 2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chai, L.; Shi, J.; Xu, Z. Establishment and application of real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR for detection of Acetilactobacillus jinshanensis. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2021, 61, 3211–3221. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bruna-Maynou, F.; Castro, R.; Rodríguez-Dodero, M.; Barroso, C.; Durán-Guerrero, E. Flavored Sherry vinegar with citric notes: Characterization and effect of ultrasound in the maceration of orange peels. Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Middelboe, M.; Brussaard, C.P.D. Marine viruses: Key players in marine ecosystems. Viruses 2017, 9, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maske, B.L.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; da Silva Vale, A.; Marques Souza, D.S.; De Dea Lindner, J.; Soccol, C.R. Viruses in fermented foods: Are they good or bad? Two sides of the same coin. Food Microbiol. 2021, 98, 103794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Agyirifo, D.; Wamalwa, M.; Otwe, E.P.; Galyuon, I.; Runo, S.; Takrama, J.; Ngeranwa, J. Metagenomics analysis of cocoa bean fermentation microbiome identifying species diversity and putative functional capabilities. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophages in food fermentations: New frontiers in a continuous arms race. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 347–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The microbiota composition of Cupei. (A) Domain level, where domains that have less than 0.5% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’; (B) genus level, where genera that have less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’; (C) species level, where species that have less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’.
Figure 1. The microbiota composition of Cupei. (A) Domain level, where domains that have less than 0.5% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’; (B) genus level, where genera that have less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’; (C) species level, where species that have less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’.
Foods 14 00398 g001
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of Archaea, Bacteria, Eukaryotes, and Viruses in Cupei.
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree of Archaea, Bacteria, Eukaryotes, and Viruses in Cupei.
Foods 14 00398 g002
Figure 3. The percentages of bacterial, fungal, and viral community abundance in Cupei. (A) Bacterial community at the genus level; (B) bacterial community at the species level; (C) fungal community at the genus level; (D) fungal community at the species level; (E) viral community at the genus level; (F) viral community at the species level. Genus or species with less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’.
Figure 3. The percentages of bacterial, fungal, and viral community abundance in Cupei. (A) Bacterial community at the genus level; (B) bacterial community at the species level; (C) fungal community at the genus level; (D) fungal community at the species level; (E) viral community at the genus level; (F) viral community at the species level. Genus or species with less than 1% relative abundance are grouped as ‘others’.
Foods 14 00398 g003
Figure 4. The functionality of de-replicated MAGs in Cupei. (A) Statistics for carbohydrate-active enzyme families in microbial genomes. (B) Statistics for COG classifications in microbial genomes. (C) Statistics for KEGG pathways in microbial genomes. (D) Statistics for KEGG pathway category ‘metabolism’ in microbial genomes.
Figure 4. The functionality of de-replicated MAGs in Cupei. (A) Statistics for carbohydrate-active enzyme families in microbial genomes. (B) Statistics for COG classifications in microbial genomes. (C) Statistics for KEGG pathways in microbial genomes. (D) Statistics for KEGG pathway category ‘metabolism’ in microbial genomes.
Foods 14 00398 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, J.; Zhao, N.; Li, Q.; Zhao, K.; Tu, M.; Li, J.; Hu, K.; Chen, S.; Liu, S.; Liu, A. Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes: Analysis of Cupei from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar, One of the Four Traditional Renowned Vinegars in China. Foods 2025, 14, 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030398

AMA Style

Wu J, Zhao N, Li Q, Zhao K, Tu M, Li J, Hu K, Chen S, Liu S, Liu A. Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes: Analysis of Cupei from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar, One of the Four Traditional Renowned Vinegars in China. Foods. 2025; 14(3):398. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Jie, Ning Zhao, Qin Li, Kui Zhao, Meiling Tu, Jianlong Li, Kaidi Hu, Shujuan Chen, Shuliang Liu, and Aiping Liu. 2025. "Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes: Analysis of Cupei from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar, One of the Four Traditional Renowned Vinegars in China" Foods 14, no. 3: 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030398

APA Style

Wu, J., Zhao, N., Li, Q., Zhao, K., Tu, M., Li, J., Hu, K., Chen, S., Liu, S., & Liu, A. (2025). Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes: Analysis of Cupei from Sichuan Baoning Vinegar, One of the Four Traditional Renowned Vinegars in China. Foods, 14(3), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop