Next Article in Journal
The Role of Food Security in Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Adolescents: Findings from the EHDLA Study
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Agro-Food Systems: From Farm to Fork
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Common Contaminant of Raw Milk from Ecuador: Isolation and Molecular Identification

by
Anthony Loor-Giler
1,2,
Marcela Robayo-Chico
2,
Byron Puga-Torres
3,
Fernanda Hernandez-Alomia
4,
Silvana Santander-Parra
5,
Antonio Piantino Ferreira
6,
Claire Muslin
5,7 and
Luis Nuñez
5,7,*
1
Laboratorios de Investigación, Dirección General de Investigación, Universidad de las Américas (UDLA), Antigua Vía a Nayón S/N, Quito EC 170124, Ecuador
2
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Carrera de Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas (UDLA), Antigua Vía a Nayón S/N, Quito EC 170124, Ecuador
3
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Jerónimo Leyton s/n y Gilberto Gatto Sobral, Quito EC 170521, Ecuador
4
Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Universidad de las Américas, Quito EC 170125, Ecuador
5
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Américas, Antigua Vía a Nayon S/N, Quito EC 170124, Ecuador
6
Laboratory of Avian Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, SP, Brazil
7
One Health Research Group, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito EC 170124, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(3), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030410
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 23 January 2025 / Accepted: 24 January 2025 / Published: 27 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Escherichia coli (E. coli), especially the Shiga toxin-producing O157:H7 strain, poses severe health risks. In rural Ecuador, raw milk consumption heightens contamination risks. This study analyzed 633 raw milk samples from Pichincha and Manabí to assess E. coli O157:H7 prevalence. The samples were enriched using BHI broth, and then specific culture media were used to isolate E. coli O157:H7. The pathogen in the enriched raw milk was identified, and the isolates were specifically confirmed through the application of a newly designed qPCR assay. The novel qPCR assay demonstrated remarkable sensitivity, capable of detecting up to one copy of genetic material, and specificity (no amplification of other bacteria). An extremely high E. coli O157:H7 prevalence of 0.63 (n = 401) was detected, where the province with the highest number of positive samples was Manabí with 72.8% (n = 225/309) and 54.3% (n = 179/324) for Pichincha. In both provinces, the presence of E. coli O157:H7 contamination exhibited a favorable correlation with small-scale farms and elevated temperatures. This research provides valuable data on the microbiological contamination of E. coli O157:H7 present in raw milk, in addition to an improved method that has been demonstrated to be faster, more sensitive, and more specific than conventional and previously published methods, highlighting the associated risk of food-borne infections and pointing out potential shortcomings in the regulation of agricultural practices and the need for periodic monitoring of bacterial contamination levels with updated methods.

1. Introduction

The dairy industry is a fundamental component of commerce and society, providing milk and dairy products that are in high demand among the population. Ecuador produces approximately 6.15 million liters of raw milk per day, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Census [1]. Dairy production represents a source of income for almost 1.2 million people. The dairy industry accounts for about 4% of the country’s agri-food GDP, with a large economic impact and a high export potential. According to data from the Internal Revenue Service (SRI), in September 2023, the dairy sector grew by 10.92% compared to the same month in 2022, being an expanding sector in response to population growth. The annual milk consumption in Ecuador is 110 L per person, according to data from the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAG), including raw milk (milk that has not undergone pasteurization) [2,3]. In Ecuador, there are approximately 299,000 milk producers, of which 80% belong to small farms and only 20% to medium and large farms. Only 4% of producers are technically trained and report high productivity [1].
Milk is the ideal culture medium for the proliferation of microorganisms [4] and may also contain antibacterial residues due to indiscriminate and irresponsible use of antimicrobials in dairy farming [5]. If the concentration of antimicrobials in milk exceeds the permitted limit stipulated by AGROCALIDAD [6], the main risk associated with its consumption is the generation of antimicrobial resistance in the human host’s microbiota or even pathogenic bacteria present in the organism and in the milk [5,7]. A high variety of microorganisms have been previously reported as prevalent in raw milk [8], specifically the genera Staphylococcus [9], Streptococcus [10], Acinetobacter [11], Salmonella [12], Campylobacter [13], Listeria [14], and Escherichia [15]. Within the Escherichia genus, Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most commonly reported bacteria.
While many E. coli strains are non-pathogenic [16], enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) has been identified as one of the most virulent groups due to its ability to produce the Shiga toxin. This toxin exerts its effect by binding to the 60S ribosomal subunit in intestinal or renal cells, with pathogenicity influenced by the presence of STX1 and STX2 variants [17]. The serovar E. coli O157:H7 is the most notable within this group, frequently associated with outbreaks linked to contaminated meat and dairy products. Clinical symptoms often include bloody diarrhea, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and thrombocytopenia, conditions closely related to microangiopathic hemolytic anemia [18].
E. coli O157:H7 has caused major outbreaks worldwide, including a 2006 spinach-related outbreak in the United States of America (USA) (205 cases, 3 deaths) [19], a 2018 romaine lettuce outbreak (210 cases, 5 deaths) [20], and a 2011 soybean sprout outbreak in Germany (over 50 deaths) [21]. These incidents emphasize the need for strict food safety measures to prevent infections, as highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO), particularly due to risks like hemolytic uremic syndrome in vulnerable populations [22]. Although specific reports of Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination in milk and dairy products within Ecuador are limited, this pathogen has been identified in Ecuadorian livestock, indicating potential animal reservoirs [23]. In the Central Highlands of Peru, E. coli O157:H7 has been isolated from beef samples and dairy calves [24]. In neighboring Colombia, the first documented human infection with E. coli O157:H7 was reported in 1998, underscoring the pathogen’s presence in the region [25]. Although no pathogen-associated illnesses have been identified in Ecuador to date, this may be a bias associated with an inadequate form of diagnosis; the absence of accurate diagnostic methods, common in developing countries, can make it very difficult to accurately associate Escherichia coli O157:H7 with disease outbreaks and related deaths [20,23,26].
Dairy production in Ecuador is mainly informal, so quality control methods are scarce and inefficient [27]; consequently, good animal husbandry practices are in decline, increasing the rates of bacterial contamination [6]. Accurate and specific detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw milk remains a challenge due to the complex nature of this matrix and the potential for cross-reactivity with other E. coli serovars in the case of serological analysis. Traditional culture techniques are time-consuming and may not differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic strains, while existing molecular methods often lack the specificity necessary for reliable identification of this strain of E. coli as they possess low standards of sensitivity and specificity.
The main objective of this study is to isolate and perform molecular identification of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk samples from Ecuador, especially from the provinces of Pichincha and Manabí, to identify specific factors contributing to elevated contamination rates, such as the weather season (because temperature changes can influence the proliferation of certain bacteria) or from small and medium-sized producers (who manage different biosecurity standards). The use of microbiological and molecular tools such as a new qPCR will allow for the specific detection of this bacteria, taking into account the need for continuous updating of diagnostic procedures, as well as the need for faster, more sensitive, and more specific methods, based on updated records of genes associated with this pathogen, such as the fimbrial gene z3276 [28]. Additionally, a comprehensive statistical analysis of all collected results will be performed to assess the prevalence and distribution of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk samples and to identify any significant correlations with parameters such as geographic location or production conditions. This integrated approach that utilizes microbiological, molecular, and statistical tools will allow us to gain a comprehensive understanding of the presence of these pathogenic bacteria in raw milk from Ecuador, serving as a catalyst for the enforcement of stricter laws on culturally consumed foods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 633 samples were collected from two provinces of Ecuador: Pichincha (324 samples) and Manabí (309 samples). The samples collected corresponded to milk intended for human consumption from cows with no apparent mastitis. This process was carried out with the collaboration of students from the Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE), who took raw milk samples from small (527 samples) and medium (106 samples) producers from 5 September 2022 to 16 July 2023 tanking considering rainy (457 samples) and warm (176 samples) conditions. The collection of these samples was carried out based on NTE INEN ISO 707 and Standard ISO 7218, under aseptic conditions, keeping the samples in sterile containers and with adequate temperature settings (4 °C) until they were received at the research laboratories of the Universidad de Las Americas (UDLA). The collection also followed parameters to classify the producers as small and medium-sized. According to Ministerial Agreement No. 095, small producers are defined as those who have between one and fifty head of cattle, while medium-sized producers have between fifty and two hundred head of cattle [29]. The climatic conditions indicated were made according to the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology (INAMHI), which indicates a warm or dry season from June to September with high temperatures (between 20 °C and 30 °C) and little rainfall and a rainy or wet season from October to May with lower temperatures (between 18 °C and 22 °C) and constant rainfall. All procedures conducted in the present investigation were in line with the guidelines and the approval of the Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory and Domestic Animal Resources of the Agency of Regulation and Control of Phytosanitary and Animal Health of Ecuador (AGROCALIDAD), under number #INT/DA/019.

Sample Size Determination

The number of samples needed for this study was calculated, determining an expected prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 of 50% in the study, a desired absolute precision of 5%, and a confidence level of 95%, using the formula n = Z 2 P e x p ( 1 P e x p ) d 2 , where n = required sample size; Pexp = expected prevalence; d = desired absolute precision; z = statistic (standard normal distribution) for a level of confidence of 95% = 1.96. Thus, the minimum number of raw milk samples required to determine the prevalence of E. coli was calculated to be 384 milk samples [30].

2.2. Primers Design

In this study, we utilized previously published primers and hydrolysis probes for the molecular identification of E. coli, centered on the lacY gene, which encodes the lactose permease [31]. Specific primers and hydrolysis probes for molecular detection of E. coli O157:H7 were designed to target a conserved part of the open reading frame z3276, denominated as a fimbrial gene related to bacterial pathogenicity, which is a high specific genetic marker of E. coli O157:H7 [28,32] (Table 1). Primer design was carried out using the Geneious Prime 2022.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com) software package [33]. An alignment was performed using Clustal X v1.83, utilizing multiple reference sequences obtained from NCBI, and the most similar regions among them were identified. The analysis of the non-prevalence of potential non-specific hybridizations was conducted using the BLASTn tool.

2.3. Standard Curve Construction and Sensitivity Assay

A synthetic double-stranded DNA fragment (gBlocks Gene Fragments, IDT) containing the target genomic sequences target for primers to identify E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 was in silico designed and obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) for standard curve formulation [34]. The engineered DNA fragment was dissolved in 50 μL of UltraPure™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. This solution was quantified on a NanoDrop™ 2000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The DNA concentration obtained was entered into the DNA Copy Number and Dilution Calculator well tool (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to determine the amount of DNA fragment needed to generate a standard dilution with 108 copies of genetic material per µL. Finally, serial one-tenth dilutions of the DNA standards were performed until 1 copy of genetic material was reached for the construction of standard curves for qPCR assay and to determine the sensitivity of the assay.

2.4. Analysis of Specificity

The new detection method for E. coli O157:H7 based on a qPCR assay was tested with extracted DNA corresponding to positive controls of the strains Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Shigella flexneri ATCC 12022, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 35150.

2.5. Milk Enrichment

The samples were subjected to an enrichment process with BHI broth according to the previously described protocol [35] in a ratio of 90% medium and 10% milk in a total of 40 mL. These samples were incubated at 37 °C for approximately 24 h with 150 g agitation.

DNA Extraction for Enriched Milk

Bacterial DNA from enriched milk was extracted to determine the presence or absence of E. coli O157H7 genetic material in it, performed through qPCR. In 1.5 mL tubes, 1 mL of enriched milk sample was placed and stored at −20 °C for approximately 24 h. The tubes were then heated in a 56 °C water bath and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min. After that, an 800 µL aliquot of the supernatant was taken and used for DNA extraction with phenol/chloroform, as outlined in the previously described protocol [36].

2.6. Bacteria Isolation

All enriched samples were subjected to an isolation process on MacConkey Agar with Sorbitol, a selective medium for E. coli 0157:H7, following the guidelines of the International Standard ISO 16654:2002/A2:2023 [37]. Following this, the isolated colonies were identified according to their phenotype. On selective MacConkey Agar with Sorbitol, E. coli O157:H7, which does not ferment sorbitol, forming transparent colonies, whereas most E. coli strains ferment sorbitol, appearing as pinkish-reddish colonies.

DNA Extraction for Isolated Bacteria

DNA was extracted from isolated colonies with phenotypic characteristics of E. coli O157:H7 to genetically confirm the isolation of this bacteria through molecular assays. The colonies were selected and placed in 1.5 mL tubes with BHI broth. These tubes were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C to pellet the cells, the supernatant was discarded, and 200 µL of TE buffer was added into each tube, homogenized with vortex, and stored at −20 °C for approximately 24 h. After approximately 24 h, the tubes were warmed at 95 °C in a dry bath (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and gently homogenized. The samples were then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and finally, 100 µL of the supernatant was aliquoted into 200 µL microtubes. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until use.

2.7. Molecular Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Using qPCR

For bacteria identification, duplex qPCR reactions were performed, using a 10 µL MasterMix consisting of 2X TaqMan™ Universal Master Mix II, with UNG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.2 µM of each primer, 0.1 µM of hydrolysis probe (Table 1), and 1 µL of DNA diluted 1:5. The amplification by qPCR was carried out under the following conditions: 1 cycle at 50 °C for 2 min for the inactivation of UNG, 1 cycle at 95 °C for 5 min for the initial denaturation followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s during denaturation, 60 °C for 45 s for reading and annealing, and 72 °C for 30 s for extension. For this, the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System thermal cycler (Bio Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA 94547, USA) was used. These qPCR protocols were used to detect the presence of E. coli O157:H7 in the DNA extracted from enriched raw milk and to confirm the bacterial isolates with selective media. In the analysis of detection data concerning enriched milk and isolates, samples that amplified for both targets were classified as E. coli O157:H7, confirming the serotype. Conversely, those that amplified solely for E. coli were categorized as non-O157:H7 E. coli.

2.8. 16S Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

Using extracted DNA from E. coli O157:H7 isolates, 16S rDNA (approximately 1400 bp) was amplified with universal primers 27F/1492R (Table 1) [38], using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR conditions included 40 cycles of 95 °C, 55 °C, and 72 °C, followed by gel electrophoresis with SYBR Safe staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Amplicons were purified using ExoSAP-IT™ (Applied Biosystems, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA), sequenced bidirectionally using BigDye® Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and analyzed on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The electropherograms generated were aligned using a reference sequence of each analyzed bacteria in Geneious software version 10.2.3 (https://www.geneious.com) [33] and analyzed by BLAST and compared to other E. coli O157:H7 sequences deposited in GenBank. The aligned sequences were used for the construction of a nucleotide similarity matrix with the help of Geneious software version 10.2.3 (https://www.geneious.com) (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand).

2.9. Multilocus Typing Sequencing (MLSTs) for Strains Identification

Fifteen DNA samples of E. coli O157:H7 isolates were randomly selected and subjected to the MLST identification previously described protocol [39]. The 7 strands (gyrB, mdh, recA, icd, fumC, adk, purA) per sample were amplified using 2X Promega GoTaqTM G2 Green Master Mix enzyme and sequenced using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the supplier’s instructions. The results were delimited based on the reference sequences present on the PubMLST website and subjected to PubMLST to identify the allelic profile of each strain. The results were used to reconstruct a minimum spanning tree (MSTs) using PHYLOViz 2.0 online software [https://online.phyloviz.net/index (accessed on 25 November 2024)] and the goeBURST algorithm.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

qPCR results were organized using descriptive statistics based on province and producer size. The data were then imported into the R Studio 2022.12.0 + 353 environment (R Core Team, 2021). The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk from Ecuador was calculated using the data from the positive samples for isolation of the strains validated with the qPCR assay, based on the formula: P r e v a l e n c e = #   o f   m e m b e r s   i n   s a m p l e   w i t h   c h a r a c t e r i s t i c T o t a l   #   o f   m e m b e r s   i n   s a m p l e , as described on the NCBI website [https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/what-is-prevalence#:~:text=For%20a%20representative%20sample%2C%20prevalence,of%20people%20in%20the%20sample (accessed on 20 November 2024)]. To carry out the statistical tests, distribution tests were performed; first a Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to determine whether the data loaded into the environment follow a normal distribution to run multivariate tests. For this analysis, the chi-square test was applied to analyze the association between variables (province, climate, and producer size). The confidence level for these tests was 95%.

3. Results

3.1. Sensitivity Assay

The standard curve allowed the determination of LoD (limit of detection) and LoQ (limit of quantification), showing that these values were up to 1 gene copy/µL. For the E. coli O157:H7 qPCR assay, the standard curve generated an efficiency of 96.0%, a slope of −3.421, and a correlation coefficient of 0.998 (Supplementary Material).

3.2. Specificity Assay

Of the positive controls used (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Shigella flexneri ATCC 12022, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 35150), only the one corresponding to the E. coli O157:H7 strain showed amplification, showing the specificity of the method against the bacteria corresponding to these strains.

3.3. qPCR Detection in Enriched Milk

In total, out of the 633 samples analyzed, 401 (63.4%) were positive for E. coli O157:H7, and 121 (19.11%) were positive for non-O157:H7 E. coli (Table 2). The frequency of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk samples was higher in Manabí than in Pichincha, with 225 (72.8%) compared to 176 (54.3%) with significative differences. The presence of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk was significantly higher in samples from small producers located in warm climate areas in the province of Manabí compared to the other groups. Additionally, small producers showed a higher contamination rate for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 in both provinces compared to medium producers, with 151 and 186 positive samples for Pichincha and Manabí, respectively. Positive samples for non-O157:H7 E. coli were higher in Pichincha (n = 86) than in Manabí (35) without showing significant differences in any of the analyzed groups based on climate and producer size. Considering the presence of any strain of E. coli, 522 positive samples were identified (82.46%), indicating a high prevalence in the country.

3.4. Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolation and qPCR Validation of Strains

A concordance of 99.75% was observed between the E. coli O157:H7 detection results from bacterial isolation on selective media and those from the qPCR assay conducted directly on enriched raw milk samples (Table 2), with only one additional sample testing positive in the qPCR assay and a Kappa coefficient > 0.9, indicating a high degree of similarity in the results. These results showed that the prevalence of E. coli O157H7 was 0.63. For the samples positive for non-O157:H7 E. coli, 100% concordance was obtained in both results.

3.5. 16S Analysis

The nucleotide similarity matrix between the E. coli O157:H7 sequences obtained in this study and sequences randomly collected from NCBI reveals high similarity, with percentages ranging from 97.65% to 99.963%. The sequences obtained in the study have outstanding nucleotide similarities with sequences from various parts of the world, including the United States of America (USA) (AY513502.1), Germany (HM007589.1), Vietnam (HQ658163.1), India (KX984112.1), Iraq (OM442028.1), and Egypt (MT705744.1). These similarities suggest a close genetic relationship between local and international strains, indicating a global distribution and circulation and possible common evolution of these pathogens. In particular, the sequence “LM 92” shows a 99.367% similarity to the USA sequence AY513502.1, and “LM 196” has a 99.478% similarity to the Egyptian MT705744.1 sequence (Table 3).

3.6. MLSTs

A total of 15 E. coli O157:H7 isolates subjected to analysis revealed an extensive range of sequence types (STs). A predominance of the tested samples, four each, were associated with the ST11 complex and the ST10 complex. One sample (86LM) was confirmed to belong to the ST206 complex, and finally, six samples showed no relationship to any complex previously reported in the PupMLST database (Table 4).
Strains within the complex ST10 (ST10, 48, 167, and 11771) and complex ST11 (ST11, 5537, 8345, and 8559) were more common. It is noteworthy that ST11 and ST48 were identified as central nodes within the minimum spanning tree (MST). ST11 demonstrated a strong relationship with ST5537, 8345, and 8559, while ST48 exhibited a strong relationship with ST10 and ST11771 (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

Milk and dairy products are highly susceptible to contamination by various chemical and biological pathogens [3,8]. Among these, biological agents, mainly bacteria, are the most common, although viruses and parasites can also be found [8]. The present study showed the presence of E. coli O157:H7 in raw milk in Ecuador, presenting an evident risk to public health. Our newly designed qPCR method used for the identification of this bacterium showed high similarity with the bacterial isolation methods (Table 2), indicating that the direct detection of E. coli O157:H7 from the DNA of enriched milk is a fast, sensitive, and adequate alternative for the diagnosis of this pathogen. Several studies have used mass sequencing as a mechanism to detect and report the presence of E. coli O157:H7 along with a wide range of other bacteria [40,41]. However, these methods are very costly and inaccessible to small and medium-sized agricultural testing laboratories; hence, rapid and economic methods such as qPCR are presented as an alternative for diagnosis [18,42]. Previous qPCR-based methods have shown an inability to detect up to one copy of bacterial genetic material [43,44], in addition to specificity problems in the presence of other enterobacteria. Therefore, the present study is shown as a viable alternative for detection in environments with high levels of contamination, such as raw milk. Furthermore, it is necessary to update diagnostic methods based on the constant new publications and additions of sequences to the databases, in particular of the Z3276 gene recently linked to the pathogenic effect of this E. coli serovar [28].
E. coli O157:H7 was detected in 63.4% (401/633) of the raw milk samples analyzed from the provinces of Pichincha and Manabí in Ecuador. These results are of great concern for public health due to the high production and consumption of raw milk daily in Ecuador [1]. A significant portion, ranging from 50 to 70%, is distributed through informal channels, primarily as liquid raw milk or artisanal dairy products like fresh cheese. These products often do not undergo sufficient thermal treatment to eliminate pathogenic microorganisms, thereby presenting a potential risk to public health in Ecuador [45,46,47]. Since its discovery as a pathogen, E. coli O157:H7 has been regularly reported in the intestines of cattle [48], indicating its presence in their feces. This bacterium can be transmitted through contaminated drinking water or various foods, including raw milk. Such pathways may contribute to significant contamination levels, compounded by inadequate management practices among farmers, which have greatly facilitated the proliferation of this pathogen that remains insufficiently regulated [49].
The qPCR assay for the detection of this pathogen in enriched raw milk showed that both Manabí and Pichincha have a higher presence in small producers (Table 2), attributed to a report by AGROCALIDAD [50], which indicates that manual milking is the predominant practice among small dairy farmers, prompting the regulatory body to include quality and biosecurity guidelines in its annex “Guide to Good Livestock Practices in Dairy Farming” [6]. However, previous studies mention that small producers who carry out manual milking do not comply with the established standards [51], which implies that raw milk and dairy products contain high levels of microbiological contamination.
The highest incidence of bacterial contamination was found in samples from Manabí (72.8%, n = 225). E. coli O157:H7 is a mesophilic bacterium, which grows at moderate temperatures, typically between 20 °C and 45 °C. The environmental conditions of the coastal region, where Manabí is located, create an environment conducive to microbial contamination [52], driving the proliferation of this and other contaminating microorganisms. Previous research has shown that these conditions significantly increase the risk of bacterial contamination in raw milk compared to industries with better equipment and regulations [45]. Environmental and socio-economic conditions in Pichincha are slightly better, with a more developed infrastructure to maintain the necessary hygiene standards [53]. Nevertheless, important challenges remain, considering that the presence of the single pathogen identified in this study was found in 54.32% of the samples analyzed (Table 2).
E. coli O157:H7 may even have the ability to survive at a potentially sub-lethal temperature for long periods of time [54] and may, therefore, be present in dairy products that have not received adequate heat treatment. Outbreaks of food-borne illnesses caused by E. coli O157:H7 have been documented worldwide. In England (2019), 57% (12/21) of cases required hospitalization for hemolytic uremic syndrome [39]. In Canada (2013), Gouda cheese made from raw milk contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 caused illness in 29 individuals, including five emergency hospitalizations and one fatality [46]. Similarly, in Ogun, Nigeria, 5% (10/202) of tested samples were positive for E. coli O157:H7, including raw milk, locally produced fresh and fried cheeses, and fermented milk [54]. In Ecuador, the Ministry of Public Health (MSP) reported 5872 cases of food-borne infections in 2021 without a confirmed diagnosis of the causative pathogen [55]. Considering the high prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in this study, there is an emerging risk of food-borne diseases associated with non-regulated foods in the country.
When analyzing the 16S sequences of the strains isolated in the present study, a high similarity with those previously deposited in GenBank was observed (Table 4), proving the phylogenetic relationship of these strains. Allelic profiling with MLSTs showed 15 different STs (Figure 1), 9 of them related to complexes described as hyperpathogenic [56]. In particular, the ST206Cplx complex has been associated with beta-lactamase-associated antimicrobial resistance, as well as resistance to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, and aminoglycosides [57,58,59,60]. Conversely, the ST10Cplx complex has been linked to the production of the Shiga toxin as a result of the effect of stx1 and stx2 genes present in several E. coli EHEC serovars, including O157:H7 and O104:H4. This complex has been primarily isolated from agricultural environments, particularly in poultry farming [57]. On the other hand, the ST11Cplx complex has been described as the distinctive ST of serovar O157:H7 [48,61] and is usually found in food for human consumption [62]. The evidence on intrinsic antimicrobial resistance in this ST is unclear; while some articles highlight multi-resistant strains [63], others point out that this group has a low number of resistance genes [64]. Therefore, it is necessary to perform local studies to identify the risk of antimicrobial ineffectiveness. On the other hand, 6 samples were not related to any complex (Table 4). Individually, they have been reported to be present in different environments, such as fermented foods, milk derivatives, meat, and pickles [65,66]. Even though some of these STs, such as ST134, have been related to some resistance genes like beta-lactamases (among others), there is not enough information about them; consequently, further studies are needed to analyze their complete genomes and define their pathogenic potential [66]. The MLST data of the E. coli O157:H7 strains collected in this study are not sufficient to determine the possible source of contamination or problems associated with the totality of specific strains present in raw milk. Future, more comprehensive studies that analyze a larger and more significant number of samples both in MLSTs and in other molecular analysis methods such as Whole Genome Sequencing (WSG) are needed [40].
Several countries such as the USA, Germany, China, Nigeria, Canada, Netherlands, and Paraguay, among others [5,20,40,46,67,68,69], have had public health emergencies due to food contamination by E. coli and other pathogens such as Salmonella, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, Listeria, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter, among others, which have endangered public health. For this reason, and taking into account the circulating strains evidenced in this study, it is imperative to conduct additional research to determine the severity of the contamination issue in food (massive detection), take into account other potential microorganisms, determine the extent to which it is impacting public health (epidemiological analysis), and, finally, to determine the phenomena of bacterial resistance found in all of these. This can be achieved through the use of qPCR methods for primary diagnostics and investigation or cutting-edge applications such as NGS (Next Generation Sequencing). Many factors may influence the increased rates of bacterial contamination in raw milk in addition to those examined in this study, such as individual good animal husbandry practices, the use of certain containers, or the proper decontamination of all equipment used. It is necessary for producers to follow the guidelines of good animal husbandry practices and to carry out periodic quality studies [70,71]. Future studies are needed to take these factors into consideration in order to determine if any of these factors served as a bias for this study, thus increasing the contamination rate of the pathogen identified here.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study underscore the significant public health risks associated with the contamination of milk and dairy products by E. coli O157:H7 in Ecuador. The high prevalence of this pathogen, particularly in raw milk from Manabí and Pichincha, highlights the urgent need for improved regulatory frameworks and adherence to biosecurity practices, especially among small producers. The qPCR method developed in this study proved to be a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective diagnostic tool, demonstrating its potential as a practical alternative to traditional and high-cost sequencing methods for pathogen detection. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis revealed hyperpathogenic strain complexes and antimicrobial resistance profiles, emphasizing the necessity of ongoing genomic surveillance to monitor and mitigate the risk of emerging multi-drug-resistant strains. Given the global and local burden of food-borne illnesses caused by E. coli O157:H7, the implementation of advanced diagnostic methods, together with stricter food safety measures, is critical to safeguard public health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14030410/s1. Figure S1: Standard curve for the qPCR assay for the detection of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7; Figure S2: Amplification plot for the standard curve of E. coli qPCR assay; Figure S3: Amplification plot for standard curve of E. coli O157:H7 qPCR assay.

Author Contributions

A.L.-G.: Formal analysis, Investigation, and Writing—original draft; M.R.-C.: Methodology, Investigation, and Writing—review and editing; B.P.-T.: Methodology and Writing—review and Editing; F.H.-A.: Investigation, Formal analysis, and Writing—review and editing; S.S.-P.: Conceptualization and Writing—review and editing; A.P.F.: Writing—review and editing; C.M.: Methodology and Writing—review and editing; L.N.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing—review and editing, Project administration, and Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Universidad de Las Americas research grant # VET.LNN.21.02.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory and Domestic Animal Resources of the Agency for Regulation and Phytosanitary and Zoosanitary Control of Ecuador (AGROCALIDAD) under number INT/DA/019 approved 31 January 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the farms that agreed to take raw milk samples, as well as to the students of the Central University of Ecuador who contributed to the same.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). Encuesta de Producción Agropecuaria Continua. Available online: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/encuesta-superficie-produccion-agropecuaria-continua-2021/ (accessed on 28 September 2024).
  2. Puga-Torres, B.; Aragón Vásquez, E.; Ron, L.; Álvarez, V.; Bonilla, S.; Guzmán, A.; Lara, D.; De la Torre, D. Milk Quality Parameters of Raw Milk in Ecuador between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 2022, 11, 3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vranješ, A.P.; Popović, M.; Jevtić, M. Raw Milk Consumption and Health. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 2015, 143, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. FAO Portal Lácteo: Peligros Para La Salud. Available online: https://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/products/health-hazards/es#:~:text=Las%20infecciones%20zoon%C3%B3ticas%20com%C3%BAnmente%20asociadas,la%20salmonelosis%20y%20la%20listeriosis (accessed on 28 September 2024).
  5. Pakbin, B.; Rossen, J.W.A.; Brück, W.M.; Montazeri, N.; Allahyari, S.; Dibazar, S.P.; Abdolvahabi, R.; Mahmoudi, R.; Peymani, A.; Samimi, R. Prevalence of Foodborne and Zoonotic Viral Pathogens in Raw Cow Milk Samples. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2022, 369, fnac108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. AGROCALIDAD. Guía de Buenas Prácticas Pecuarias de Producción. Available online: https://www.agrocalidad.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Gu%C3%ADa-de-BPP-General-jul.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2024).
  7. Straley, B.A.; Donaldson, S.C.; Hedge, N.V.; Sawant, A.A.; Srinivasan, V.; Oliver, S.P.; Jayarao, B.M. Public Health Significance of Antimicrobial-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Raw Bulk Tank Milk. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2006, 3, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, O.; Stanton, C.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D. The Complex Microbiota of Raw Milk. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 664–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shalaby, M.; Reboud, J.; Forde, T.; Zadoks, R.N.; Busin, V. Distribution and Prevalence of Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcal enterotoxins in Raw Ruminants’ Milk: A Systematic Review. Food Microbiol. 2024, 118, 104405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mihklepp, K.; Kivirand, K.; Juronen, D.; Lõokene, A.; Rinken, T. Immunodetection of Streptococcus uberis Pathogen in Raw Milk. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2019, 130, 109360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohamed, H.M.A.; Abd-Elhafeez, H.H.; Al-Jabr, O.A.; El-Zamkan, M.A. Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Raw Milk. Biology 2022, 11, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lobacz, A.; Zulewska, J. Fate of Salmonella spp. in the Fresh Soft Raw Milk Cheese during Storage at Different Temperatures. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Davis, K.R.; Dunn, A.C.; Burnett, C.; McCullough, L.; Dimond, M.; Wagner, J.; Smith, L.; Carter, A.; Willardson, S.; Nakashima, A.K. Campylobacter jejuni Infections Associated with Raw Milk Consumption—Utah, 2014. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 65, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Praça, J.; Furtado, R.; Coelho, A.; Correia, C.B.; Borges, V.; Gomes, J.P.; Pista, A.; Batista, R. Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Coagulase Positive Staphylococci in Cured Raw Milk Cheese from Alentejo Region, Portugal. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feliciano, R.; Boué, G.; Mohssin, F.; Hussaini, M.M.; Membré, J.-M. Probabilistic Modelling of Escherichia coli Concentration in Raw Milk under Hot Weather Conditions. Food Res. Int. 2021, 149, 110679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riley, L.W. Distinguishing Pathovars from Nonpathovars: Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2020, 8, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barbosa, C.A.; Conceição, T.A.; Baliza, M.D.; Camilo, V.M.A.; Juiz, P.J.L.; Silva, I.M.M. Virulence Genes in Escherichia coli Isolates from Commercialized Saltwater Mussels Mytella guyanensis (Lamarck, 1819). Braz. J. Biol. 2019, 79, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xing-long, X.; Cong-cong, L.; Yang, Q.; Yi-gang, Y.; Hui, W. Molecular Monitoring of Escherichia coli O157: H7 Sterilization Rate Using QPCR and Propidium Monoazide Treatment. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 56, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maki, D.G. Don’t Eat the Spinach—Controlling Foodborne Infectious Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 1952–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hoff, C.; Higa, J.; Patel, K.; Gee, E.; Wellman, A.; Vidanes, J.; Holland, A.; Kozyreva, V.; Zhu, J.; Mattioli, M.; et al. Notes from the Field: An Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infections Linked to Romaine Lettuce Exposure—United States, 2019. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 689–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tzschoppe, M.; Martin, A.; Beutin, L. A Rapid Procedure for the Detection and Isolation of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) Serogroup O26, O103, O111, O118, O121, O145 and O157 Strains and the Aggregative EHEC O104:H4 Strain from Ready-to-Eat Vegetables. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 152, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ameer, M.A.; Wasey, A.; Salen, P. Escherichia coli (e. Coli 0157 H7). Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507845/ (accessed on 30 September 2024).
  23. Trueba, G.; Garcés, V.; Barragan, V.V.; Colman, R.E.; Seymour, M.; Vogler, A.J.; Keim, P. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ecuador: Animal Reservoirs, Yet No Human Disease. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gonzales, B.L.; Andrade, D.A.; Valdivia, C.A.; Ho-Palma, A.C.; Munguia, A.; Yucra, D.; Escobedo, M.; Crotta, M.; Limon, G.; Gonzalez, A.; et al. Detection and Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef from Food Markets and Fecal Samples of Dairy Calves in the Peruvian Central Highlands. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2023, 109, 568–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mattar, S.; Vásquez, E. Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infection in Colombia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998, 4, 126–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prado-Silva, L.; Cadavez, V.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; Rezende, A.C.B.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Sanitizing Treatments on Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria Monocytogenes Inactivation in Fresh Produce. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 8008–8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Contero Callay, R.E.; Requelme, N.; Cachipuendo, C.; Acurio, D. Calidad de La Leche Cruda y Sistema de Pago Por Calidad En El Ecuador. Granja 2021, 33, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, B.; Sun, X.; Fan, H.; He, K.; Zhang, X. The Fimbrial Gene Z3276 in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 Contributes to Bacterial Pathogenicity. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. MAG Acuerdo Ministerial No. 095. Available online: https://www.agricultura.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ACUERDO-095-2021-1.pdf (accessed on 30 September 2024).
  30. Rodríguez del Águila, M.; González-Ramírez, A. Sample Size Calculation. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2014, 42, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pavlovic, M.; Luze, A.; Konrad, R.; Berger, A.; Sing, A.; Busch, U.; Huber, I. Development of a Duplex Real-Time PCR for Differentiation between E. coli and Shigella spp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 1245–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ravan, H.; Amandadi, M. Analysis of Yeh Fimbrial Gene Cluster in Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Order to Find a Genetic Marker for This Serotype. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 71, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dotmatics Geneious. Available online: https://www.geneious.com (accessed on 9 January 2024).
  34. Conte, J.; Potoczniak, M.J.; Tobe, S.S. Using Synthetic Oligonucleotides as Standards in Probe-Based QPCR. Biotechniques 2018, 64, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ding, T.; Suo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, D.; Ye, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Y. A Multiplex RT-PCR Assay for S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp. Detection in Raw Milk with Pre-Enrichment. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dalla-Costa, L.M.; Morello, L.G.; Conte, D.; Pereira, L.A.; Palmeiro, J.K.; Ambrosio, A.; Cardozo, D.; Krieger, M.A.; Raboni, S.M. Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods Used to Detect Bacterial and Yeast DNA from Spiked Whole Blood by Real-Time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 140, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. ISO 16654:2001; Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Detection of Escherichia coli O157. ISO (International Organization for Standardization): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  38. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lau, S.H.; Reddy, S.; Cheesbrough, J.; Bolton, F.J.; Willshaw, G.; Cheasty, T.; Fox, A.J.; Upton, M. Major Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Strain Isolated in the Northwest of England Identified by Multilocus Sequence Typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weiler, N.; Martínez, L.J.; Campos, J.; Poklepovich, T.; Orrego, M.V.; Ortiz, F.; Alvarez, M.; Putzolu, K.; Zolezzi, G.; Miliwebsky, E.; et al. First Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates from Clinical Samples in Paraguay Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2023, 55, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. da Silva Santos, A.C.; Gomes Romeiro, F.; Yukie Sassaki, L.; Rodrigues, J. Escherichia coli from Crohn’s Disease Patient Displays Virulence Features of Enteroinvasive (EIEC), Enterohemorragic (EHEC), and Enteroaggregative (EAEC) Pathotypes. Gut Pathog. 2015, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sarkar, S.L.; Alam, A.R.U.; Das, P.K.; Pramanik, M.H.A.; Al-Emran, H.M.; Jahid, I.K.; Hossain, M.A. Development and Validation of Cost-Effective One-Step Multiplex RT-PCR Assay for Detecting the SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using SYBR Green Melting Curve Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Haffar, M.; Gilbride, K.A. The Utility and Application of Real-Time PCR and FISH in the Detection of Single-Copy Gene Targets in Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium. Can. J. Microbiol. 2010, 56, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, B.; Hu, Z.; Elkins, C.A. Detection of Live Escherichia coli O157:H7 Cells by PMA-QPCR. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 84, e50967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Arteaga Solórzano, R.A.; Armenteros Amaya, M.; Quintana García, D.; Martínez Vasallo, A. Evaluación de Las Buenas Prácticas En La Elaboración de Queso Artesanal En Manabí, Ecuador. Rev. Salud Anim. 2021, 43, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  46. Currie, A.; Galanis, E.; Chacon, P.A.; Murray, R.; Wilcott, L.; Kirkby, P.; Honish, L.; Franklin, K.; Farber, J.; Parker, R.; et al. Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infections Linked to Aged Raw Milk Gouda Cheese, Canada, 2013. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mead, P.S.; Griffin, P.M. Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lancet 1998, 352, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Riley, L.W.; Remis, R.S.; Helgerson, S.D.; McGee, H.B.; Wells, J.G.; Davis, B.R.; Hebert, R.J.; Olcott, E.S.; Johnson, L.M.; Hargrett, N.T.; et al. Hemorrhagic Colitis Associated with a Rare Escherichia coli Serotype. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983, 308, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scott, L.; Mcgee, P.; Minihan, D.; Sheridan, J.; Earley, B.; Leonard, N. The Characterisation of E. coli O157:H7 Isolates from Cattle Faeces and Feedlot Environment Using PFGE. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 114, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. AGROCALIDAD. Agencia de Regulación y Control Fito y Zoosanitario. Available online: https://www.agrocalidad.gob.ec/ (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  51. Baars, T. Regulations and Production of Raw Milk. In Raw Milk; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 65–89. [Google Scholar]
  52. Maffucci, I.; Laage, D.; Stirnemann, G.; Sterpone, F. Differences in Thermal Structural Changes and Melting between Mesophilic and Thermophilic Dihydrofolate Reductase Enzymes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 18361–18373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Onyeaka, H.; Ghosh, S.; Obileke, K.; Miri, T.; Odeyemi, O.A.; Nwaiwu, O.; Tamasiga, P. Preventing Chemical Contaminants in Food: Challenges and Prospects for Safe and Sustainable Food Production. Food Control 2024, 155, 110040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Han, A.; Paek, J.; Lee, S.-Y. Thermal Resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Laboratory Media, Milk, and Beef Extracts during Non-Isothermal Processing at Various Heating Rates. Food Microbiol. 2023, 110, 104187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ministerio de Salud Pública (MSP). Subsistema de Vigilancia Sive-Alerta Enfermedades Transmitidas por Agua y Alimentos Ecuador. Available online: https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GACETA-SE-21-ETAS.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2024).
  56. Cummins, E.A.; Hall, R.J.; Connor, C.; McInerney, J.O.; McNally, A. Distinct Evolutionary Trajectories in the Escherichia coli Pangenome Occur within Sequence Types. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, J.; Jiang, Z.; Ju, Z.; Zhao, X.; Yang, J.; Guo, H.; Sun, S. Molecular and Phenotypic Characteristics of Escherichia coli Isolates from Farmed Minks in Zhucheng, China. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 917841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Leclercq, S.O.; Bochereau, P.; Foubert, I.; Baumard, Y.; Travel, A.; Doublet, B.; Baucheron, S. Persistence of Commensal Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in the Broiler Production Pyramid Is Best Explained by Strain Recirculation from the Rearing Environment. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1406854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ogundare, S.T.; Fasina, F.O.; Makumbi, J.-P.; van der Zel, G.A.; Geertsma, P.F.; Kock, M.M.; Smith, A.M.; Ehlers, M.M. Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Pathogenic Escherichia coli from Commercial Swine and Poultry Abattoirs and Farms in South Africa: A One Health Approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 951, 175705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zheng, B.; Lv, T.; Xu, H.; Yu, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Guo, L.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, X.; et al. Discovery and Characterisation of an Escherichia coli ST206 Strain Producing NDM-5 and MCR-1 from a Patient with Acute Diarrhoea in China. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wyrsch, E.; Chowdhury, P.R.; Abraham, S.; Santos, J.; Darling, A.E.; Charles, I.G.; Chapman, T.A.; Djordjevic, S.P. Comparative Genomic Analysis of a Multiple Antimicrobial Resistant Enterotoxigenic E. coli O157 Lineage from Australian Pigs. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Samadpour, M.; Barbour, M.W.; Nguyen, T.; Cao, T.-M.; Buck, F.; Depavia, G.A.; Mazengia, E.; Yang, P.; Alfi, D.; Lopes, M.; et al. Incidence of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes in Retail Fresh Ground Beef, Sprouts, and Mushrooms. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Abebe, E.; Gugsa, G.; Ahmed, M.; Awol, N.; Tefera, Y.; Abegaz, S.; Sisay, T. Occurrence and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of E. coli O157:H7 Isolated from Foods of Bovine Origin in Dessie and Kombolcha Towns, Ethiopia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0010706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, S.; Zhu, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Li, H. Prevalence and Characterization of Escherichia coli O157 and O157:H7 in Retail Fresh Raw Meat in South China. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1993–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pan, Y.; Hu, B.; Bai, X.; Yang, X.; Cao, L.; Liu, Q.; Sun, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Jin, D.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Humans and Domestic Animals. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, G.; Zhang, S.; Huang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, M.; Xue, L. Isolation and Characterization of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli in Foods Sold at Retail Markets in China. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Projahn, M.; Lamparter, M.C.; Ganas, P.; Goehler, A.; Lorenz-Wright, S.C.; Maede, D.; Fruth, A.; Lang, C.; Schuh, E. Genetic Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) Derived from German Flour. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 347, 109197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thomas, C.M.; Marr, J.H.; Durso, L.M.; Golwalkar, M.; Irving, D.J.; Orejuela, K.; Rasnic, R.; Ripley, D.; Rue, B.; Thomas, L.S.; et al. Notes from the Field: Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 Linked to Raw Milk Consumption Associated with a Cow-Share Arrangement—Tennessee, 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023, 72, 469–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jenkins, C.; Bird, P.K.; Wensley, A.; Wilkinson, J.; Aird, H.; Mackintosh, A.; Greig, D.R.; Simpson, A.; Byrne, L.; Wilkinson, R.; et al. Outbreak of STEC O157:H7 Linked to a Milk Pasteurisation Failure at a Dairy Farm in England, 2019. Epidemiol. Infect. 2022, 150, e114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cerva, C.; Bremm, C.; dos Reis, E.M.; Bezerra, A.V.A.; Loiko, M.R.; da Cruz, C.E.F.; Cenci, A.; Mayer, F.Q. Food Safety in Raw Milk Production: Risk Factors Associated to Bacterial DNA Contamination. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014, 46, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Singha, S.; Ceciliani, F.; Rahman, M.d.M.; Mannan, M.A.; Chowdhury, S.; Nath, S.C.; Paul, O.B.; Persson, Y.; Boqvist, S. Factors Influencing Somatic Cell Counts and Bacterial Contamination in Unpasteurized Milk Obtained from Water Buffalo in Bangladesh. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree (MST) generated using the PHYLOViz tool from the allelic profiles of 15 E. coli O157:H7 isolates from raw milk from Ecuador. Each ST is represented by a circle. The length of the lines between each ST shows proportionally the number of different alleles. The strain types connected with gray lines are more distantly related to the central nodes.
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree (MST) generated using the PHYLOViz tool from the allelic profiles of 15 E. coli O157:H7 isolates from raw milk from Ecuador. Each ST is represented by a circle. The length of the lines between each ST shows proportionally the number of different alleles. The strain types connected with gray lines are more distantly related to the central nodes.
Foods 14 00410 g001
Table 1. Primers and probes used in this study.
Table 1. Primers and probes used in this study.
NameTargetSequenceReference
EClpma (−1)lacY
gene
5′-ACCAGACCCAGCACCAGATAAG-3′[31]
lacY_t_rev15′-CTGCTTCTTTAAGCAACTGGCGA-3′
lacY_p1FAM/5′-CATACATATTGCCCGCCAGTACAGAC-3′/1BHQ
E. coli 0157:H7-Fz3276 locus5′-TGCGTGGTAAAACAGATAATGGTG-3′This study [AE005174]
E. coli 0157:H7-R5′-TGTTTTCCATAATGATGTCGC-3′
E. coli 0157:H7-PCY5/5′-ACAGAACCACCAAAAGGGACTGAGGCTG-3′/3BHQ
Table 2. Analysis of bacteria isolation in selective media and qPCR detection in enriched milk for the two bacteria detected in relation to the locality of the samples, producer size, and percentage for each bacterium of positive samples over the total number of samples in the province.
Table 2. Analysis of bacteria isolation in selective media and qPCR detection in enriched milk for the two bacteria detected in relation to the locality of the samples, producer size, and percentage for each bacterium of positive samples over the total number of samples in the province.
ProvinceProducer SizeClimate/Collection DateEscherichia coli (non-O157:H7)Escherichia coli O157:H7Negative SamplesTotal of Samples
PichinchaSmall *Warm/Jun–Sep△38 (22%)△85 (49%)49172
Rainy/Oct–May△30 (30.6%)△66 (67.3%)298
MediumWarm/Jun–Sep△9 (36.5%)◍14 (41.2%)/13 (38.2%)1134
Rainy/Oct–May△9 (45%)△11 (55%)020
Manabí *Small *Warm/Jun–Sep△29 (13.8%)△142 (67.6%) *39210
Rainy/Oct–May△1 (2.1%)△44 (93.6%)247
MediumWarm/Jun–Sep△5 (12.2%)△28 (68.3%)841
Rainy/Oct–May△0 (0.0%)△11 (100%)011
Total of positives121 (19.1%)401 (63.3%)111633
* Significant differences in statistical analysis between different microorganisms. △ Identical results in isolation (validated by specific qPCR) and molecular identification in enriched milk by qPCR. ◍ Non-identical results in isolation and qPCR assays divided in: left for qPCR and right for isolation. Jun–Sep = from June to September. Oct–May = from October to May.
Table 3. Comparison between the nucleotides of Escherichia coli O157:H7 sequences obtained in this study and the sequences collected from NCBI. Sequences obtained in this study are marked in light blue.
Table 3. Comparison between the nucleotides of Escherichia coli O157:H7 sequences obtained in this study and the sequences collected from NCBI. Sequences obtained in this study are marked in light blue.
Sample ID1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.
1. AY513502 USA-99.92699.24298.95199.40898.97599.25599.36798.17698.36298.43698.66099.33098.36299.47999.032
2. HM007589 GERMANY99.926-99.33598.86799.38798.93999.23199.34698.11598.30898.38598.61599.30898.30899.46299.000
3. HQ658163 VIETNAM99.24299.335-97.83098.89098.55398.88398.84697.65597.91597.91598.13898.80997.91598.95898.585
4. KX984112 INDIA98.95198.86797.830-99.07198.68398.92199.03397.84297.95498.02898.25198.90397.95499.07098.698
5. OM442028 IRAQ99.40899.38798.89099.071-99.64699.85199.96398.69698.73398.80899.10699.77798.80899.85199.627
6. MT705744 EGYPT98.97598.93998.55398.68399.646-99.64499.72898.38898.38898.38898.72399.56198.47299.56099.477
7. LM 89 ECUADOR99.25599.23198.88398.92199.85199.644-99.81498.54798.58498.65998.95799.62898.65999.70299.478
8. LM 92 ECUADOR99.36799.34698.84699.03399.96399.72899.814-98.65998.69698.77099.06999.73998.77099.81499.590
9. LM 94 ECUADOR98.17698.11597.65597.84298.69698.38898.54798.659-98.84599.21898.69698.51198.69698.62198.323
10. LM 96 ECUADOR98.36298.30897.91597.95498.73398.38898.58498.69698.845-98.73398.88298.51199.47898.88298.510
11. LM 98 ECUADOR98.43698.38597.91598.02898.80898.38898.65998.77099.21898.733-98.95798.58598.51098.95798.584
12. LM 100 ECUADOR98.66098.61598.13898.25199.10698.72398.95799.06998.69698.88298.957-98.88399.25599.10698.733
13. LM 101 ECUADOR99.33099.30898.80998.90399.77799.56199.62899.73998.51198.51198.58598.883-98.58599.62899.404
14. LM 169 ECUADOR98.36298.30897.91597.95498.80898.47298.65998.77098.69699.47898.51099.25598.585-98.80898.584
15. LM 196 ECUADOR99.47999.46298.95899.07099.85199.56099.70299.81498.62198.88298.95799.10699.62898.808-99.478
16. LM 201 ECUADOR99.03299.00098.58598.69899.62799.47799.47899.59098.32398.51098.58498.73399.40498.58499.478-
Table 4. Allelic profile of the 15 E. coli O157:H7 samples analyzed in this study based on the 7 markers (gyrB, mdh, recA, icd, fumC, adk, and purA). STs and allelic complexes determined on the basis of PubMLST. Non-determined (ND).
Table 4. Allelic profile of the 15 E. coli O157:H7 samples analyzed in this study based on the 7 markers (gyrB, mdh, recA, icd, fumC, adk, and purA). STs and allelic complexes determined on the basis of PubMLST. Non-determined (ND).
SampleN° of AllelesSTComplex
gyrBmdhrecAicdfumCadkpurA
86 LM4821762512701ST206 Cplx
89 LM49163413441310134ND
137 LM15524423222091224387ND
139 LM81634131212102650ND
143 LM8152121212211ST11 Cplx
260 LM472109115785044ND
261 LM4828111013167ST10 Cplx
277 LM48281110810ST10 Cplx
480 LM7527421411611271717ND
483 LM1828116811771ST10 Cplx
484 LM4828116848ST10 Cplx
501 LM415243452095711749ND
505 LM81521211531228345ST11 Cplx
540 LM81521211821228559ST11 Cplx
562 LM8152126981225537ST11 Cplx
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loor-Giler, A.; Robayo-Chico, M.; Puga-Torres, B.; Hernandez-Alomia, F.; Santander-Parra, S.; Piantino Ferreira, A.; Muslin, C.; Nuñez, L. Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Common Contaminant of Raw Milk from Ecuador: Isolation and Molecular Identification. Foods 2025, 14, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030410

AMA Style

Loor-Giler A, Robayo-Chico M, Puga-Torres B, Hernandez-Alomia F, Santander-Parra S, Piantino Ferreira A, Muslin C, Nuñez L. Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Common Contaminant of Raw Milk from Ecuador: Isolation and Molecular Identification. Foods. 2025; 14(3):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loor-Giler, Anthony, Marcela Robayo-Chico, Byron Puga-Torres, Fernanda Hernandez-Alomia, Silvana Santander-Parra, Antonio Piantino Ferreira, Claire Muslin, and Luis Nuñez. 2025. "Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Common Contaminant of Raw Milk from Ecuador: Isolation and Molecular Identification" Foods 14, no. 3: 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030410

APA Style

Loor-Giler, A., Robayo-Chico, M., Puga-Torres, B., Hernandez-Alomia, F., Santander-Parra, S., Piantino Ferreira, A., Muslin, C., & Nuñez, L. (2025). Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Common Contaminant of Raw Milk from Ecuador: Isolation and Molecular Identification. Foods, 14(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop