Next Article in Journal
How Chemical and Sensorial Markers Reflect Gentian Geographic Origin in Chardonnay Wine Macerated with Gentiana lutea Roots?
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Fermentation and Phytase Treatment of Pea-Oat Protein Blend on Physicochemical, Sensory, and Nutritional Properties of Extruded Meat Analogs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/foods9081060
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional and Physicochemical Characterization of Strychnos madagascariensis Poir (Black Monkey Orange) Seeds as a Potential Food Source

by
Kiana Kirsty van Rayne
1,
Oluwafemi Ayodeji Adebo
2 and
Nomali Ziphorah Ngobese
1,*
1
Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. BOX 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
2
Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. BOX 17011, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(8), 1060; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081060
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 31 July 2020 / Published: 5 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Food Security and Sustainability)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Strychnos madagascariensis Poir is an underutilized fruit that is considered a valuable food during droughts and famine. The aim of this research was to characterize the nutritional composition and the flour functional properties, for the use as a potential food source. Seed flour was analysed using a standard enzymatic assay for sugars, acid/neutral detergent analysis for fibre, ether extraction for fat and HPLC for strychnine. Results showed that the seeds contained 41% reducing sugars and 53% fibre. The mineral composition, determined using microwave-assisted acid digestion and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES), showed that the seeds contained high quantities of iron (15.78 mg/100 g) and manganese (9.86 mg/100 g). The flour water absorption index (1.37 g/g) was substantially higher than that of wheat, brown rice and tapioca flours and the oil absorption index showed similarities to the reference flours (1.09 g/g). The flour peak (37,788 RVU) and final viscosities (62,928 RVU) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the reference flours. This study was the first to quantify the strychnine content (0.08%) in the seeds. Results suggest that the seeds have good potential for food product development; however, further processing is essential to ensure safety for consumption.

1. Introduction

Many developing countries are faced with the problem of food insecurity, which is threatening the quality of life of inhabitants. This issue is also on the rise as the world population is rapidly increasing, placing a higher demand on the currently available food staples and imported food goods [1]. Thus, native edible plants as staple alternatives or supplements may be used to combat this problem, by lessening the demand on current staples and reducing the need for food importation [1,2]. According to Van Wyk [3], South Africa is home to a large variety of edible plants that may be used to produce food and beverages, for both the local and international market.
Coupled with the threat of climate change and a drastic reduction in rainfall (particularly in southern Africa), agricultural food production has been greatly affected, thus worsening the food security status and increasing the dependence on imported staple foods. It has been proposed that the use of underutilized indigenous food crops may improve food production as certain plants are well adapted to the environment and require substantially low amounts of water, low agronomical inputs, as well as other characteristics that allow them to adapt to current climate changes. Moreover, deviation from the current agricultural mono-cropping systems and the introduction of a larger variety of underutilized crops may contribute greatly in the adoption of agro-biodiversity, which benefits the environment [4].
A rising interest has developed in South Africa, around the genus Strychnos (Monkey orange) as a new food crop due to specific species within this genus. These species are known for their production of edible fruits and high drought tolerance, making them suitable for arid regions [5]. Particularly, S. madagascariensis Poir (commonly known as black monkey orange) belongs to the family Loganiaceae. It is a native southern African tree, which is distributed in Limpopo, North-West, Mpumalanga, Eswatini, KwaZulu-Natal and Botswana. The tree produces high fruit yields, containing numerous large translucent seeds. According to Shaffer [2], only the fruit pulp of S. madagascariensis is consumed (ranging between bitter to very sweet in taste) as it is believed that the seeds may contain the toxic alkaloid, strychnine. However, there has been contradictory claims surrounding the toxicity of the seeds as Govender [5] reported that the seeds are consumed. The toxicity of the seeds has not been proven and is not supported by any ethnobotanical data. The fruit is considered to be an underutilized commodity as its full potential as a food source has not yet been realized. Underutilized food plants typically provide higher nutritional value in comparison to those commonly consumed [6]. Thus, the aim of this study is to determine the nutritional composition of these seeds, characterize the functional properties of the seed flour and to determine its safety as a potential food source.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Flour Samples

Ripe (orange) fruits of S. madagascariensis were obtained from the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) in Nelspruit, South Africa (25°27′04.6″ S, 22°56′15.0216″ E). The seeds were removed from the fruit pulp and freeze-dried for five days. The seeds were then milled and further ground using a coffee grinder (Bosch, South Africa). The ground material was then passed through a 250 µm sieve and stored in airtight zip-lock plastic bags. Reference flours were purchased at local supermarkets: uncooked, gluten-enriched wheat flour (Premier, South Africa), long-grain gluten free brown rice flour (Health Connection Wholefoods, South Africa), dehulled split chickpea flour (Natures Choice, South Africa), coconut flour (Health Connection Wholefoods, Philippines) and tapioca flour (Health Connection Wholefood, Thailand).

2.2. Macronutrient Determination

The moisture content of the flour samples was determined using the MLB 50-3N moisture meter (Kern, Germany). The total fibre content of the seeds was calculated using the acid detergent fibre (ADF) fraction and the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) fraction. These components were determined using the methods set out by Goering and Van Soest [7], in which samples were digested in an acid-detergent solution and a neutral-detergent solution (respectively) using a digestion block. Reducing sugars and starch quantification were performed using the Somogyi–Nelson assay and spectrophotometry methods set out by Al-Mhanna [8]. The fat content was determined through ether extraction, using the methods of AOAC [9]. The protein fraction was determined by multiplying the total nitrogen composition (obtained during ICP–OES mineral analysis) with the conversion factor (6.25) to yield the crude protein composition. The reference samples were obtained from the South African foods data system [10]. The total carbohydrate fraction was calculated using the sugar, fibre and starch compositions. The total energy was then calculated based on the macronutrient composition using Equation (1), excluding the contribution of the fibre content in the carbohydrate fraction. The percentage contribution of the flour to the nutrient reference values (NRVs) were calculated using Equation (2). The NRVs for macronutrients were obtained from the European Food Safety Authority [11] and the World Health Organization [12]:
Kcal = (% protein × 4) + (% carbohydrate × 4) + (% Fat × 9)
% NRV = (Nutrient/NRV) × 100

2.3. Mineral Analysis

The mineral composition (Na, P, Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, N) was determined according to Santos [13], with slight modifications. The samples were prepared using microwave-assisted acid digestion. Approximately 500 mg of the sample was placed into the vessel together with 10 mL of 65% nitric acid. The vessels containing the sample and the standard solutions were then placed into the microwave, model MARS 6240/50 (Matthews, NC, USA). The digestion was run using the plant material setting with a ramp time of 20–25 min, at 200 °C and a hold time of 10 min. The pressure within the vessels was released and the digested plant material was transferred into 10 mL falcon tubes. Analysis was performed using ICP-OES, with the conditions for radiofrequency power (1.3 kW), nebulizer pressure (150 kPa), plasma argon flow rate (15 L/min) and auxiliary argon flow rate (1.5 L/min). The percentage contribution of the micronutrient composition of the flour was calculated using Equation (1), mentioned above. The NRVs for the macronutrients were obtained from the Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals [14].

2.4. Quantification of Strychnine

Strychnine was quantified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), UV detection (254 nm), 25 cm × 4.2 mm ID column (packed with μBondpack C18, 10 μm particle size) and the methods outlined in the NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM) [15]. Strychnine was extracted from the flour sample (1 g) using 5 mL of the mobile phase (1.1014 g of 1-heptanesulfonic acid sodium salt in 980 mL of 1:1 acetonitrile (chromatographic quality): water made up to 1 L, pH 3.5). The solution was then filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter and placed in an autosampler. The quantity of strychnine was determined through the use of a standard curve constructed using standard solutions of strychnine (Sigma Aldrich, Germany).

2.5. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Analysis

Sample preparation for metabolite profiling was done according to the methods set out by Adebo [16] with slight modifications. 3 g of the flour samples were weighed into centrifuge tubes and mixed with 30 mL of 80% aqueous methanol (Merck, South Africa). This solution was agitated and incubated for 24 h on a shaking incubator at 4 °C. Following the incubation, the solutions were centrifuged at 3500 rpm at 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was then concentrated in a round bottom flask using a rotavapor under vacuum at 40 °C. The concentrated extract was filtered through a 2 µm syringe filter and transferred into dark amber vials. The extraction was done in triplicate for each flour sample and the analysis was done on a gas chromatography high resolution time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOF-MS) system having an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) operating in high resolution, with a Gerstel MPS multipurpose autosampler (Gerstel Inc. Germany) and a Rxi®-5 ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm) (Restek, Bellefonte, USA). 1 µL was injected in splitless mode with helium as the carrier gas. The initial oven temperature was set at 70 °C, held for 0.5 min, ramped at 10 °C/min to 150 °C, held for 2 min, ramped at 10 °C/min to 330 °C and held for 3 min. Subsequent data obtained were processed by evaluating each of the three replicates and selecting only the compounds found within each replicate. Once this was done, the common compounds found within S. madagascariensis seed flour were compared to those of the reference flours to construct a table of comparison.

2.6. Water and Oil Absorption Index

The water absorption index (WAI) and the oil absorption index (OAI) of the flour samples were determined using the methods set out by Julianti [17]. Approximately 1 g of each flour sample was placed into centrifuge tubes, together with 10 mL of distilled water (for WAI) or 10 mL of sunflower oil (Pick n Pay Retailers, South Africa) for OAI. The suspensions were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min at 25 °C. The supernatant was then discarded, and the pellet was weighed. The WAI and OAI were calculated using the formula:
WAI or OAI = (Weight of pellet)/(Weight of flour sample)

2.7. Swelling Power and Solubility

The swelling power (SP) and the solubility (S) of S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours were determined using the methods of Yu [18] with minor modifications. Approximately 1 g of the sample was placed into centrifuge tubes together with 15 mL of distilled water. A slurry was made by vortexing the mixture until all the powder was dissolved. The solution was then heated in a water bath (Optolabor, Johannesburg) at 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 °C for 30 min. The tubes were allowed to cool to room temperature and then centrifuged at 2600× g for 15 min. The supernatant was decanted into its respective pre-weighed glass petri dishes and evaporated at 105 °C, for 24 h. They were allowed to cool to room temperature and the resulting pellets weighed. Solubility and swelling power were calculated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively:
S = Wr/W × 100
SP = Wt/(W − Wr)
where Wr is the weight of the dried supernatant; W is the weight of the sample and Wt is the weight of the wet sediment (pellet).

2.8. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectroscopy has gained popularity in the food industry as it is a rapid and non-destructive technique for the analysis of food compositions. This technique is simple and requires little to no sample preparation as samples may be analysed in their original state [19]. The IR Affinity-1S series FTIR equipment (Shimadza, Japan) was used for the analysis. The method of Sujka [20] was followed for the analysis. The flours were placed in a measuring chamber and were scanned within the spectral range of 4000–370 cm−1 using a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.9. Pasting Properties

The pasting properties of the test and reference flours were determined using a rapid visco analyser (RVA) (4500, Perten Instruments, Sweden) following the methods of Kongolo [21]. Suspensions were made containing flour and distilled water (14% w/w, flour in dH2O). The suspensions were then equilibrated for 1 min at 50 °C and stirred for 30 s at 960 rpm. The stirring speed was then reduced to 160 rpm and the temperature was increased to 91 °C at a rate of 11.08 °C/min. Once the samples had reached the desired temperature, they were held at that temperature for a further 2.5 min. The temperature was then decreased to 50 °C and held for 1 min, after which the critical points (pasting temperature, peak viscosity, final viscosity, breakdown viscosity and set back viscosity) were determined.

2.10. Gel Texture Properties

The gel texture properties of the test and reference flours were analysed using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Brighton, UK) and a 2 mm cylinder probe. The pastes produced in Section 2.9 were used for this analysis. The pastes were transferred into plastic sample holders (dimensions: 2 cm in height and 3.5 cm wide) and allowed to set for 2 h at 25 °C. The texture analyser was programmed using the following settings: pre-test and test speed—1.0 mm/s, post-test speed—10.0 mm/s and penetration distance—5 mm. The texture properties (gel firmness, penetration energy) were determined using the TA.XT Exponent© software.

2.11. Colour Properties

The colour properties of the test and reference flours were determined using the tristimulus Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage’s (CIELAB) scale, using a CR-10 chromameter (Konica Minolta Sensing Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The CIELAB values L * (white = 100 and black = 0), a * (positive = red and negative = green) and b * (positive = yellow and negative = blue) were recorded. The chroma, yellowness and flour colour index (FCI) were calculated using Equations (6)–(8), respectively:
Chroma = √(a˄2 + b˄2)
Yellowness = (142.86 × b)/L
FCI = L − b

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Except for FTIR, all other analyses were done in triplicate. Genstat for Windows 19th Edition (VSNI, UK) was used for statistical analyses. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test was performed to differentiate between the means at the 95% probability level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Nutritional Evaluation

3.1.1. Micro and Macronutrient Composition

When analysing the macronutrient composition of the seed four (Table 1), the carbohydrate fraction (~89.85%) was noted as the major component of the seeds; furthermore, this fraction is predominantly composed of fibre (~53%) and reducing sugars (~41%). The other macronutrient fractions of the seed flour, such as fats (~0.95%, similar to that of wheat flour, 1%) and protein (~8.27%, similar to that of wheat flour, 8.2%) constitutes less than 10% of the flour composition. Furthermore, it was found that the seeds contain no starch. The fibre content of S. madagascariensis seeds is far greater than that of dried broad beans (22.9%), a popular fibre-rich food [22]. According to Schweizer and Würsch [23] and Maćkowiak [24], fibre has beneficial effects in the gastrointestinal tract. A high prebiotic fibre diet improves the functioning of the gastrointestinal tract as it acts as a substrate (prebiotic) for the build-up of beneficial microflora and reduces the risk of constipation. Furthermore, the improved functioning of the gastrointestinal tract, assisted by the fermentation of prebiotic dietary fibre, aids in digestion, by promoting the uptake of minerals [25], thus further highlighting the potential of S. madagascariensis seeds for the possible alleviation of mineral deficiencies. However, further investigation is required to quantify the amount of prebiotic dietary fibre present in the seeds. S. madagascariensis seeds contain moderate amounts of energy (189.03 kcal), which is substantially lower than that of commercial flours (i.e., wheat flour 358 kcal, brown rice flour 365 kcal and chickpea flour 378 kcal, data which were obtained from the food composition tables of South Africa [22]). Although the energy content is lower than that of commercial flours, the seeds may still hold potential as a valuable source of nutrients.
When comparing the micronutrient composition (Table 1) of the seeds to that of popular flours and mineral rich foods found in the food composition tables of South Africa [22], it is observed that the Ca (148.03 mg/100 g), Fe (15.78 mg/100 g), K (594.36 mg/100 g) and Mn (9.86 mg/100 g) are present in substantially high quantities. In particular, the Ca and Fe contents of S. madagascariensis seeds were higher than those found in lentil (Ca = 80 mg/100 g and Fe = 6.9 mg/100 g), wheat (Ca = 14 mg/100 g and Fe = 1.2 mg/100 g) and brown rice flour (Ca = 11 mg/100 g and Fe = 2 mg/100 g). The K content was found to be substantially higher than that reported for peeled bananas (241 mg/100 g) wheat flour (105 mg/100 g) and brown rice flour (289 mg/100 g), while the Mn content greatly exceeded that found within wheat (0.63 mg/100 g) and brown rice flour (4 mg/100 g). The seeds also contained Mg (79.25 mg), P (94.20 mg), Na (16.45 mg), Zn (1.36 mg) and Cu (0.72 mg). The rich mineral composition thus suggests that the use of the seed of S. madagascariensis may have the potential in alleviating some mineral deficiencies associated with developing/underdeveloped countries. Moreover, Fe deficiency is considered to be the most predominant micronutrient deficiency across the world [26]. In southern Africa, it is reported that females and black Africans are most susceptible to Fe deficiency [27].
Many species within the genus Strychnos are considered to be toxic due to the presence of strychnine. The strychnine content of S. madagascariensis seeds (0.08%) was found to be substantially lower than that of S. nux-vomica (~1.1%) [28]. However, the seeds may still be harmful if consumed. Furthermore, the processing of these seeds may further reduce or eliminate the strychnine content. Further investigation is required to evaluate the strychnine content after processing. Strychnos nux-vomica is the main member of the genus that has made it popular—it is cultivated in many parts of the world and is a medicinally important plant, specifically in Indian and Chinese remedies. Although the seeds are the main target, the leaves, bark and fruit are utilized for herbal remedies as well after they have been processed (boiled or cooked) in order to reduce the quantity of strychnine. These techniques might not be effective in reliably reducing the strychnine content [29,30], nor being suitable in the development of a potential food product. As such, other conventional and novel food processing techniques should be considered to effectively reduce the strychnine content, to improve its food use. Traditionally, the seeds of S. nux-vomica are used for an array of therapeutic and clinical applications, which include increasing appetite, reducing fevers, and being used as an aphrodisiac and a tonic [31]. Furthermore, a study conducted by Chen et al. [28] revealed that the processing (treated with 50% ethanol) of the seed powder of S. nux-vomica significantly improved the medicinal efficiency and greatly reduced the toxicity, in comparison to the unprocessed seed powder. Another study conducted by Choi et al. [32] evaluated the traditional processing techniques of S. nux-vomica seeds, and reported an effective reduction in the strychnine content, among other alkaloids. These studies, although developed for the production of medicine and herbal remedies, reveal that strychnine may be substantially reduced. Further research is required to develop methods suitable for food product development, to efficiently eliminate the strychnine content within S. madagascariensis seeds and ensure safety for consumption.

3.1.2. GC–MS Analysis

Table 2 documents those compounds found within S. madagascariensis seed flour. The seed flour shared some compounds with the reference flours; however, the majority of the compounds identified were unique to S. madagascariensis. The compounds shared between the seed powder and reference flours include pyrazole, vinyl acrylate, ethylene acetal and methoxy-phenyl-oxime. To ensure that the seed flour of S. madagascariensis is safe for consumption and food product development, further analysis is essential to quantify the compounds listed in Table 2, as compounds such as vinyl acrylate, trifluoromethylcinnamic acid, methylcyclopentenolone and silicon tetrafluoride may exist in toxic amounts.

3.2. Flour Characterization

3.2.1. Water and Oil Absorption Index

The absorption properties of S. madagascariensis seed flour were observed through evaluating their WAI, OAI, solubility and swelling power. The WAI of flours has direct implications on its use in food products; typically, flours with high WAI are sought after for food products requiring high viscosities such as baked products, soups and gravies [33], while the OAI is important in facilitating the flavour enhancement of food products, as it promotes flavour retention and the increased palatability and mouth feel of food products. Additionally, it gives an indication of better reconstitution ability and good dough properties during the preparation of fat-related products, such as baked products [17]. The WAI and OAI of S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours are indicated in Figure 1. The WAI of S. madagascariensis seed flour was found to be significantly different (p < 0.001) to the reference flours used. However, it was observed to be substantially high (compared to wheat, chickpea and tapioca flour), showing the second highest WAI just below that of coconut flour, thus indicating the seed flours potential as a thickening agent. The WAI is of particular importance during the processing of the flour, as it has direct effects on its pasting properties and represents the ability of a flour to associate with ‘under-water’ conditions (i.e., high temperatures) where such interactions are limited. The OAI of the seed flour showed similarities to brown rice flour, chickpea flour and tapioca flour. However, the OAI was substantially lower than that of wheat and coconut flour. Owing to the lack of starch in the seed flour, it is assumed that the WAI and OAI are attributed to the high fibre and sugar content of the flour, thus indicating the presence of cellulose and sucrose as these components are known for their water-holding capacities [34].

3.2.2. Solubility and Swelling Power

Figure 2A,B, represents the S and SP patterns, respectively, of S. madagascariensis seed flour compared to those of reference flours. Water solubility is an indication of the soluble solid content of the flour, thus indicating the degree of starch degradation in relation to the level of maturity of the produce [35]. The seed flour showed a significantly (p < 0.001) high percentage of solubility across all the temperatures in comparison to the reference flours. Additionally, the seed flour showed a gradual increase in solubility with an increase in temperature, with a peak solubility at 100 °C. The SP of the flours is an indication of its water absorption properties [17]. The seed flour showed a maximum swelling power at 50 °C, which then gradually decreased with an increase in temperature. The swelling power of S. madagascariensis showed significant difference (p < 0.05) within this temperature range (60–100 °C). This is possibly due to the lack of starch granules within the seed flour, which hinder the increase in swelling. A similar pattern was observed for coconut flour, where no substantial increase in swelling occurred. The remaining reference flours (tapioca, wheat, chickpea and brown rice) all showed a gradual increase in SP with an increase in temperature. However, the overall swelling capacity of S. madagascariensis seed flour is similar to the maximum SP of the reference samples; suggesting that the seed flour possesses similar water absorption characteristics.

3.2.3. FTIR

Flour properties of S. madagascariensis seed were analysed using FTIR and were compared to those of the reference flours, as depicted in the FTIR spectra below (Figure 3A,B). The seed flour of S. madagascariensis shows a similar FTIR spectral pattern to that of the reference flours, as it produces major peaks (although not very intense) within the same regions as the reference flours. These regions include N–H (3350–3310 cm−1), O–H (3000 cm−1), C = C (1650–1600 cm−1), N–O (1550–1500 cm−1), C–O (1150 cm−1) stretching and O–H (1440–1395 cm−1) and C = C (995–985 cm−1) bending groups (representing the following compound classes: secondary amine, carboxylic acid, conjugated alkene nitro compound, aliphatic ether, carboxylic acid and alkenes, respectively). The major peaks were identified through the use of IR spectroscopy correlation tables [36]. Regions between 1640 cm−1 and 3300 cm−1 are indicative of the moisture content as the water molecules possess a strong absorption within this range, due to the O–H stretching and H bending vibrations [37]. S. madagascariensis flour showed differences to most of the reference flours (excluding coconut flour) within the C–O stretching regions, of 1085–1050 cm−1 (arrow 1) and 1150–1085 cm−1 (arrow 2). These regions represent the primary alcohol group and the aliphatic ether group [36]. The FTIR spectrum shows that the seed flour of S. madagascariensis showed similarities to those of the commercial flours, suggesting that it may be used in similar food products.

3.2.4. Pasting and Textural Properties

Table 3 compares the pasting properties and textural properties (penetration force) of S. madagascariensis seed flour to those of the reference flours used. The dashes in the gel texture column indicate data that could not be used, due to instrumental errors that occurred during the analysis. Flour pasting is defined as the process post-gelatinization, which includes the swelling and disruption of starch grains, and the release of molecular components. The presence of large amounts of fibrous material may hinder swelling and affect the viscosity of the sample during heating [38]. All the flours tested showed an increase in viscosity with increases in temperature. S. madagascariensis seed flour showed the second highest peak viscosity (3149 RVU) and the highest through the final and setback viscosities, as well as a relatively low breakdown viscosity. This was surprising as the flour had 0% starch (Table 1), implying there were no granules to facilitate swelling and gelatinization. Typically, the viscosities of the flour solutions were attributed to their starch content, as starch granule swelling and amylose leakage facilitate paste formation [39]. However, from the nutritional evaluation of the S. madagascariensis seed, the flour was found to contain no starch (Table 1), though with a high carbohydrate content (primarily composed of fibre and sugar). Thus, the high peak and final viscosities may be caused by the high sugar content of the flour, implying good potential use as a viscosity builder or stabilizer in food products similar to guar gum [40]. According to Pongsawatmanit [41], increases in sugar concentration (particularly sucrose) may increase both the peak and final viscosity of flour solutions, thus explaining the high viscosities previously mentioned. The pasting temperature of flour solutions is an indication of the point at which gelatinization is initiated, as this is the point at which sudden rises in viscosity occur. Thus, the pasting temperature provides a guideline of the minimum heat required to cook the flour to obtain the required viscosity [41]. S. madagascariensis seed flour showed a significantly low pasting temperature, indicating that less energy is required to gelatinize the flour.
Gel texture is a significant factor in food product development, as it indicates the ability of the gel to retain its structure and moisture content post processing [20]. The gel texture properties of S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours are indicated in Table 3. The gel texture (hardness = firmness and penetration force) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that of the reference samples, contradicting expectations as it possesses a high peak and final viscosities. This indicates that the seed flour gel regressed much more easily than that of the reference flours. This could be due to the lack of starch, which is essential in maintaining the gels’ shape.

3.2.5. Colour Properties

Colour profiling of S. madagascariensis was done according to the CIELAB scale and compared to that of the reference samples (Table 4). Additional colour evaluations were done, such as the chroma and FCI. Figure 4 below gives a visual depiction of the colour variation between the samples after being exposed to moisture and high temperatures. The figure shows pastes obtained from RVA in plastic sample holders. The degree of lightness (L *, redness (a *), yellowness (b *), chroma and FCI was significantly different (p < 0.05) to the reference flours used. The seed flour showed a higher degree of redness (a * = +0.9) and yellowness (b * = +12.7) compared to the reference samples, except for chickpea flour which had a yellowness value of +19.5, which may be due to the presence of the fruit pulp that was not completely removed from all of the seeds. Moreover, when comparing the colour of the pastes obtained from RVA (Figure 4), the seed flour paste was substantially darker than the reference flour pastes. This may be due to the non-enzymatic browning of the sample, facilitated by the exposure to high temperatures and moisture. The various reactions that may have led to the browning of the sample include the Maillard reaction, caramelization, chemical oxidation of phenols and maderisation [42]. However, further research is required to determine the particular reaction or reactions responsible for the increase in darkness of the flour after processing, as well as to determine the effects of these reactions on the antioxidant properties of the seed flour.

4. Conclusions

The seeds of S. madagascariensis have the potential to be a valuable food source due to the high amounts of fibre, sugar and certain minerals (especially K and Fe), which exceeds those of some commonly consumed products. The fibre content is of importance as this fraction may contribute greatly to the functioning of the gastrointestinal tract, while the high iron content may prove to be beneficial in combating iron deficiencies in South Africa. Although the seeds of S. madagascariensis hold valuable nutritional potential, it is crucial to develop food processing methods to reduce the strychnine content prior to their use in the food industry. Further research should be directed towards quantifying other phytochemicals, which might present anti-nutritional properties. The functional properties of S. madagascariensis seed flour may be beneficial in food product development as it possesses a high water absorption capacity, as indicated by its water absorption index and swelling power. Moreover, its high peak and final viscosities suggest that it may be used as a thickening agent in sauces or soups. The colour properties may be a hindrance, as the flour and the paste are substantially darker than the popular commercial flours. However, the consumer acceptability of varying flour colours is currently increasing. The commercialization of this underutilized fruit may also benefit the surrounding rural communities, as it provides entrepreneurial opportunities for the development of new food sources and the cultivation of this species. However, it is essential to rule out any toxicity hazard of the seeds’ prior use in the food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Z.N.; methodology, K.K.v.R. and O.A.A.; investigation, K.K.v.R.; software and formal analysis, K.K.v.R. and N.Z.N.; data curation, N.Z.N.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K.v.R.; supervision, O.A.A. and N.Z.N.; project administration and funding acquisition, N.Z.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Johannesburg’s Faculty of Science and the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for financial support.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Obiro Cuthbert Wokadala for his contribution in the conceptualization of this work and input in editing drafts of the manuscript. Acknowledgement is due to Rebogile Mphahlele and Karen de Jager (from the South African Agricultural Research Council) for technical support in processing the fruits used for the study and Joelle Ilunga Kongolo for technical support during the characterization of the functional properties of the seed flour.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdulmumin, U.; Umar, K.J.; Muhammad, M.U.; Abubakar, L. Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Composition of Monkey Orange (Strychnos innocua Del) Fruit Seeds Grown in Zuru, Nigeria. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shaffer, L.J. A Landscape of Possibilities: Seeking Food Security in Matutúine District, Mozambique. Ecolog. Environ. Anthropol. (Univ. Ga.) 2008, 4, 37–53. [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Wyk, B.E. The Potential of South African Plants in the Development of New Food and Beverage Products. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2006, 77, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mabhaudhi, T.; Chimonyo, V.G.P.; Modi, A.T. Status of Underutilised Crops in South Africa: Opportunities for Developing Research Capacity. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Govender, M. Strychnos madagascariensis. 2008. Available online: www.pza.sanbi.org/strychnos-madagacariensis (accessed on 30 March 2020).
  6. Bjarklev, A.; Kjærgård, B.; Jelsøe, E.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. Fostering Sustainability in New Value Chains for (Re)Adopting Underutilized Crops. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goering, H.K.; Van Soest, P.J. Forage fiber Analysis (Apparatus Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). In Agriculture Handbook; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Mhanna, N.M.; Huebner, H.; Buchholz, R. Analysis of the Sugar Content in Food Products by Using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Enzymatic Methods. Foods 2018, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 13th ed.; Association of Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  10. SAMRC. South African Foods Data System. 2018. Available online: http://safoods.mrc.ac.za/faq.html (accessed on 5 March 2019).
  11. European Food Safety Authority. 2017. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/DRV_Summary_tables_jan_17.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2020).
  12. World Health Organization. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet (accessed on 17 June 2020).
  13. Santos, H.M.; Coutinho, J.P.; Amorim, F.A.C.; Lobo, I.P.; Moreira, L.S.; Nascimento, M.M.; De Jesus, R.M. Microwave-Assisted Digestion Using Diluted HNO3 and H2O2 for Macro and Micro Elements Determination in Guarana Samples by ICP OES. Food Chem. 2019, 273, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals (2003), Safe Upper Levels for Vitamins and Minerals. Available online: https://cot.food.gov.uk/committee/committee-on-toxicity/cotreports/cotjointreps/evmreport (accessed on 11 June 2020).
  15. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. Strychnine. 1996. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-135/pdf/96-135 (accessed on 17 April 2020).
  16. Adebo, O.A.; Kayitesi, E.; Tugizimana, F.; Njobeh, P.B. Differential Metabolic Signatures in Naturally and Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Fermented Ting (a Southern African food) with Different Tannin Content, as Revealed by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)-Based Metabolomics. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Julianti, E.; Rusmarilin, H.; Yusraini, E. Functional and Rheological Properties of Composite Flour from Sweet Potato, Maize, Soybean and Xanthan Gum. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2017, 16, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, S.; Ma, Y.; Menager, L.; Sun, D. Physicochemical Properties of Starch and Flour from Different Rice Cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 5, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Durazzo, A.; Kiefer, J.; Lucarini, M.; Camilli, E.; Marconi, S.; Gabrielli, P.; Aguzzi, A.; Gambelli, L.; Lisciani, S.; Marletta, L. Qualitative Analysis of Traditional Italian Dishes: FTIR Approach. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sujka, K.; Koczoń, P.; Ceglińska, A.; Reder, M.; Ciemniewska-Żytkiewicz, H. The Application of FT-IR Spectroscopy for Quality Control of Flours Obtained from Polish Producers. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kongolo, J.I.; Da Silva, L.S.; Wokadala, O.C.; Du Plessis, B.; Husselman, J.; Ngeobo, M.E.K.; Emmambux, N.M.; Daneel, M. Pasting, Thermal, Gel Texture, Resistant Starch and Colour Properties of Unripe Banana Flour from 10 Dessert Banana Varieties Cultivated in South Africa. Food Meas. 2017, 11, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wolmarans, P.; Danster, N.; Dalton, A.; Rossouw, K.; Schönfeldt, H. Condensed Food Composition Tables for South Africa; Medical Research Council: Cape Town, Africa, 2010; pp. 1–126. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schweizer, T.F.; Würsch, P. The Physiological and Nutritional Importance of Dietary Fiber. Experientia 1991, 47, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maćkowiak, K.; Torlińska-Walkowiak, N.; Torlińska, B. Dietary Fiber as an Important Constituent of the Diet. Adv. Hyg. Exp. Med. 2016, 70, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carlson, J.L.; Erickson, J.M.; Lloyd, B.B.; Slavin, J. Health Effects and Sources of Prebiotic Dietary Fiber. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2018, 2, nzy005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jordaan, E.; Berg, V.L.V.D.; Van Rooyen, F.C.; Walsh, C.M. Obesity is Associated with Anaemia and Iron Deficiency Indicators among Women in the Rural Free State, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Phatlhane, D.V.; Zemlin, A.E.; Matsha, T.E.; Hoffman, M.; Naidoo, N.; Ichihara, K.; Smit, F.; Erasmus, R.T. The Iron Status of a Healthy South African Adult Population. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 460, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Qu, Y.; Wang, D.; Peng, P.; Cai, H.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Cai, B. Pharmacological Evaluation of Total Alkaloids from Nux Vomica: Effect of Reducing Strychnine Contents. Molcules 2014, 19, 4395–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Otter, J.; D’Orazio, J.L. Strychnine Toxicity. 2019. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459306/. (accessed on 26 March 2019).
  30. Chan, T.Y.K. Herbal Medicine Causing Likely Strychnine Poisoning. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2002, 21, 467–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maji, A.K.; Banerji, P. Strychnos nox-vomica: A Poisonous Plant with Various Aspects of Therapeutic Significance. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2017, 8, 87–103. [Google Scholar]
  32. Choi, Y.H.; Sohn, Y.M.; Kim, C.Y.; Oh, K.Y.; Kim, J. Analysis of Strychnine from Detoxified Strychnos nux-vomica Seeds Using Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chandra, S.; Singh, S.; Kumari, D. Evaluation of Functional Properties of Composite Flours and Sensorial Attributes of Composite Flour Biscuits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 3681–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Munoz, E.; Garcia-Manrique, J.A. Water Absorption Behaviour and its Effect on the Mechanical Properties of Flax Fiber Reinforced Bioepoxy Composites. Inter. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Da Silva, M.C.; De Carvalho, C.W.P.; Andrade, C.T. The Effects of Water and Sucrose Contents on the Physicochemical Properties of Non-Directly Expanded Rice Flour Extrudates. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 29, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chemistry LibreTexts. Available online: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Ancillary_Materials/Reference/Reference_Tables/Spectroscopic_Parameters/Infrared_Spectroscopy_Absorption_Table (accessed on 17 February 2020).
  37. Amir, R.M.; Anjum, F.M.; Khan, M.I.; Khan, M.R.; Pasha, I.; Nadeem, M. Application of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for the Identification of Wheat Varieties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 50, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shafie, B.; Cheng, S.C.; Lee, H.H.; Yiu, P.H. Characterization and Classification of Whole-Grain Rice Based on Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) Pasting Profile. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar]
  39. Collar, C.; Santos, E.; Rosell, C.M. Significance of Dietary Fiber on the Viscometric Pattern of Pasted and Gelled Flour-Fiber Blends. Cereal Chem. J. 2006, 83, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yazdanseta, P.; Tarzi, B.G.; Gharachorloo, M. Effect of Some Hydrocolloids on Reducing Oil Uptake and Quality Factors of Fermented Donuts. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2015, 6, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pongsawatmanit, R.; Thanasukarn, P.; Ikeda, S. Effect of Sucrose on the RVA Viscosity Parameters, Water Activity and Freezable Water Fraction of Cassava Starch Suspensions. Sci. Asia 2002, 28, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Manzocco, L.; Calligaris, S.; Mastrocola, D.; Nicoli, M.C.; Lerici, C.R. Review of Non-Enzymatic Browning and Antioxidant Capacity in Processed Foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 11, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 09 01060 g001 550
Figure 1. Water (A) and oil (B) absorption index of Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to five commercial flours. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of each of the samples, with Least Significant Difference values of 0.0248 and 0.00737 for water absorption index (WAI) and oil absorption index (OAI), respectively. Bars with the same letters above them show no significant differences (p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Water (A) and oil (B) absorption index of Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to five commercial flours. The error bars indicate the standard deviations of each of the samples, with Least Significant Difference values of 0.0248 and 0.00737 for water absorption index (WAI) and oil absorption index (OAI), respectively. Bars with the same letters above them show no significant differences (p < 0.001).
Foods 09 01060 g001
Foods 09 01060 g002 550
Figure 2. Solubility (A) and swelling power (B) of Strychnos madagascariensis seed compared to commercial flours, at varying temperatures. The error bars indicate the LSD values for each of the samples.
Figure 2. Solubility (A) and swelling power (B) of Strychnos madagascariensis seed compared to commercial flours, at varying temperatures. The error bars indicate the LSD values for each of the samples.
Foods 09 01060 g002
Foods 09 01060 g003a 550Foods 09 01060 g003b 550
Figure 3. (A) Superimposed FTIR spectra of the S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours (wheat, brown rice, chickpea, coconut and tapioca), and (B) the region where the differences are observed in the S. madagascariensis seed flour.
Figure 3. (A) Superimposed FTIR spectra of the S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours (wheat, brown rice, chickpea, coconut and tapioca), and (B) the region where the differences are observed in the S. madagascariensis seed flour.
Foods 09 01060 g003aFoods 09 01060 g003b
Foods 09 01060 g004 550
Figure 4. Sample pastes obtained from the rapid visco analyser (RVA) indicating the colour variations between the S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours, for which the pastes were obtained by creating a suspension of flour and water (14% w/w), heating to a maximum temperature of 91 °C and allowing to cool for 2 h at 25 °C.
Figure 4. Sample pastes obtained from the rapid visco analyser (RVA) indicating the colour variations between the S. madagascariensis seed flour and the reference flours, for which the pastes were obtained by creating a suspension of flour and water (14% w/w), heating to a maximum temperature of 91 °C and allowing to cool for 2 h at 25 °C.
Foods 09 01060 g004
Table
Table 1. Nutritional composition and strychnine content of S. madagascariensis seed flour (per 100 g) and the flours’ percentage contribution to NRVs.
Table 1. Nutritional composition and strychnine content of S. madagascariensis seed flour (per 100 g) and the flours’ percentage contribution to NRVs.
Nutritional CategoryCompositionNRVPercentage Contribution to NRVs
Calories189.03 kcal ± 0.002000 kcal9.45%
Total Fat0.95 g ± 0.0044.44–77.78 g2.14%
Total Carbohydrates
Total fibre
Sugar
Starch		89.85 g
53 g ± 3.65
41 g ± 4.69
0 g ± 0.00		225–300 g
25 g
<50 g
150–225 g		34.94%
200%
82%
0%
Protein8.27 g ± 0.1349.8 g16.61%
Strychnine0.08% ± 0.04N/AN/A
Ca148.03 mg ± 6.00700 mg/day21.15%
Mg79.25 mg ± 1.00285 mg/day27.80%
K594.36 mg ± 4.003500 mg/day16.98%
P94.20 mg ± 2.002400 mg/day3.93%
Na16.45 mg ± 1.001600 mg/day1.03%
Zn1.36 mg ± 0.0242 mg/day3.24%
Mn9.86 mg ± 0.112.2 mg/day80.82%
Fe15.78 mg ± 0.46.7 mg/day (males)
11.4 mg/day (females)		235.52%
138.42%
Cu0.72 mg ± 0.0110 mg/day 7.2%
Nutrient reference values (NRVs) are a set of values that are used as a reference point for the daily intake of micro and macronutrients, which are required to maintain a healthy and balanced diet [14]. Table 1 above indicates the NRVs for both micro and macronutrients as well as the percentage contributions of S. madagascariensis seeds to these values. From this table, it can be seen that the total fibre, sugar, Mn and Fe contribute greatly towards these daily recommended values (200, 82, 81 and 236/138%, respectively). This further highlights the potential of S. madagascariensis seeds as a food alternative or supplement, aiming to alleviate food insecurity and mineral deficiencies.
Table
Table 2. Volatile metabolic compounds identified in S. madagascariensis seed flour in reference to the other flours.
Table 2. Volatile metabolic compounds identified in S. madagascariensis seed flour in reference to the other flours.
CompoundRetention Time (s)Mass (BPI)S. madagascariensisWheatBrown riceChickpeaCoconutTapioca
Pyrazole179.85843.0179XX X
Vinyl acrylate204.11355.018X X
Ethylene acetal189.01073.0284X X
Furfuryl alcohol214.60398.0364X
dl-Alanine ethyl ester222.35444.0258X
Methoxy-phenyl-oxime229.186133.0137XXX X
Cyclotene309.017112.0519X
Furaneol342.0557.0336X
Butanoic acid240.122112.0519X
Methylcyclopentenolone309.017112.0519X
Hydratropaldehyde376.572105.0699X
Silicon tetrafluoride456.77585.0284X
2-Acetoxy-5-hydroxyacetophenone488.172137.0234X
Styrene glycol491.52107.0493X
Trifluoromethylcinnamic acid726.178199.0601X
a-Dnp-L-arginine913.88669.0955X
Benzenepropanoic acid496.505107.0604X
Cyclo(leucyloprolyl)1043.4970.0653X
Quinoline502.308138.0676X
BPI = base peak intensity. X indicates the presence of the compound.
Table
Table 3. Pasting properties of the Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to the five reference flours.
Table 3. Pasting properties of the Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to the five reference flours.
Flour TypePeak Viscosity (RVU)Trough Viscosity (RVU)Breakdown Viscosity (RVU)Final Viscosity (RVU)Setback Viscosity (RVU)Peak Time (min)Pasting Temp (°C)Gel Texture (N)
S. madagascariensis37788 ± 2016 b20580 ± 96 c17208 ± 1944 b62928 ± 552 e42348 ± 492 e2 ± 0.1 a50 ± 0.1 a3 ± 0.4 a
Coconut7548 ± 1008 d3552 ± 864 a3984 ± 600 a12804 ± 3240 a9240 ± 2508 b5 ± 0.1 c93 ± 0.4 f-
Brown rice18924 ± 888 c15000 ± 432 b3924 ± 1116 a34416 ± 408 c19416 ± 624 c6 ± 0.3 cd86 ± 0.5 e14 ± 0.7 d
Wheat33540 ± 744 b13980 ± 252 b19560 ± 492 b31848 ± 1032 c17868 ± 828 c5 ± 0 cd67 ± 0.5 b11 ± 1.6 c
Tapioca78228 ± 5796 a14124 ± 2016 b64092 ± 4944 c40872 ± 3804 d26736 ± 2496 d3 ± 0.1 b70 ± 0.5 c-
Chickpea18132 ± 516 c15744 ± 528 b2388 ± 84 a20184 ± 600 b4440 ± 72 a6 ± 0.2 d78 ± 0.4 d5 ± 0.7 b
Means accompanied with the same letter in a given column show no significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Colour properties of the Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to the five reference flours.
Table 4. Colour properties of the Strychnos madagascariensis seed flour compared to the five reference flours.
SampleL*a*b*ChromaFCI
S. madagascariensis81 ± 0.3 a0.9 ± 0.1 e12.7 ± 0.6 c12.7 ± 0.6 c68.5 ± 0.6 b
Coconut86 ± 0.2 c0.2 ± 0.1 b11.3 ± 0.4 b11.3 ± 0.4 b74.9 ± 0.5 c
Brown rice84 ± 0.3 b0.5 ± 0.1 c10.6 ± 0.3 b10.6 ± 0.3 b74.3 ± 0.1 c
Wheat87 ± 0.3 d0.6 ± 0.1 d10.7 ± 0.2 b10.7 ± 0.2 b76.8 ± 0.5 d
Tapioca93 ± 0.2 e-0.2 ± 0.1 a3.8 ± 0.2 a3.8 ± 0.2 a89.3 ± 0.3 e
Chickpea86 ± 0.3 c1.1 ± 0.1 f19.5 ± 0.2 d19.5 ± 0.2 d66.6 ± 0.1 a
Means accompanied by the same letter in a given column are not significantly different (p < 0.05). L* (white = 100 and black = 0), a* (positive = red and negative = green), b* (positive = yellow and negative = blue). FCI – Flour Colour Intensity.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

van Rayne, K.K.; Adebo, O.A.; Ngobese, N.Z. Nutritional and Physicochemical Characterization of Strychnos madagascariensis Poir (Black Monkey Orange) Seeds as a Potential Food Source. Foods 2020, 9, 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081060

AMA Style

van Rayne KK, Adebo OA, Ngobese NZ. Nutritional and Physicochemical Characterization of Strychnos madagascariensis Poir (Black Monkey Orange) Seeds as a Potential Food Source. Foods. 2020; 9(8):1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081060

Chicago/Turabian Style

van Rayne, Kiana Kirsty, Oluwafemi Ayodeji Adebo, and Nomali Ziphorah Ngobese. 2020. "Nutritional and Physicochemical Characterization of Strychnos madagascariensis Poir (Black Monkey Orange) Seeds as a Potential Food Source" Foods 9, no. 8: 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081060

APA Style

van Rayne, K. K., Adebo, O. A., & Ngobese, N. Z. (2020). Nutritional and Physicochemical Characterization of Strychnos madagascariensis Poir (Black Monkey Orange) Seeds as a Potential Food Source. Foods, 9(8), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop