Next Article in Journal
Sensory Acceptability of Dual-Fortified Milled Red and Yellow Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Dal in Bangladesh
Next Article in Special Issue
High Hydrostatic Pressure Assisted by Celluclast® Releases Oligosaccharides from Apple By-Product
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Traditional Croatian Household-Produced Dry-Fermented Sausages
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Biological Value Compounds Extraction from Citrus Waste with Non-Conventional Methods
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/foods9080994
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Calcium Amino Acid Chelate in the Production of Acid-Curd Goat Cheese

by
Małgorzata Pawlos
1,*,
Agata Znamirowska
1,
Grzegorz Zaguła
2 and
Magdalena Buniowska
1,*
1
Department of Dairy Technology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Rzeszow, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35601 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Rzeszow, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35601 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(8), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9080994
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 16 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 24 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Food Ingredients for Safe and Health-Promoting Functional Foods)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amino acid chelates are a new group of compounds approved for food enrichment, however there is no previous research using calcium amino acid chelate to enrich goat’s milk products. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the possibility of using calcium amino acid chelate to produce goat’s acid-curd cheese. In this study, four types of acid-curd cheeses from goat’s milk subjected to 85 °C/5 min treatment were produced: control cheeses—made from milk without calcium addition and cheeses from milk enriched with 30, 35 and 40 mg of Ca (in 100 g of milk) in the form of calcium amino acid chelate. Goat cheese with calcium amino acid chelate had a higher moisture content, and a lower fat content. More fat was separated with the whey. In cheeses made from the milk with calcium amino acid chelate there was no goaty taste. Enrichment with 35 mg of Ca in 100 g of goat milk increased the calcium content in cheese by 60.5% in comparison to the control sample. However, the enrichment of goat milk with 40 mg Ca (in 100 g of processed milk) increased the calcium content in cheese by only 63.29%.

1. Introduction

According to Clark and Mora Garcia [1] and Park et al. [2] caprine milk is characterized by enhanced digestibility, better alkalinity, buffering capacity and is beneficial to human health in comparison with cow milk. Goat’s milk is often suggested as a substitute of cow’s milk for allergic patients, because of a lower quantity of α-caseins, but the results about its cross-reactivity are still controversial [3]. According to Monaci et al. [4] milk of all ruminant species contains homologous proteins, which share the same properties and contribute to the cross-reactivity phenomenon in allergic individuals. Higher levels of calcium, potassium, iron, copper and manganese are found in goat’s milk than in cow’s milk and the content of these elements is higher compared to cow’s milk [5]. However, the chemical composition of milk including the macro- and microelements content is not constant and depends on a variety of environmental, genetics and physiological factors [5,6].
Since ancient times goat milk has been used for manufacture of different types of cheeses worldwide [7]. Acid-curd cheeses are a characteristic dairy products in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In East-Central Europe Tvarog is widely available and a well-known and valued group of traditional fresh acid-curd cheeses. Acid curd cheese from whole milk in the daily diet is a valuable source of high biological value protein, easily digestible fat, vitamins and minerals [8]. In the production of acid-curd cheese, two methods of coagulation of milk proteins are used: acid or acid-rennet. According to Danków and Pikul [6], Bonfim da Silva and Pereira da Costa [9] and Domagała [10] the acid curd from goat milk has a very delicate structure, less firmness and viscosity compared to cow’s milk curd. Additionally, it is easy to brittle, which makes it difficult to process. Miocinovic et al. [11] study showed that the differences in the rheological properties of acid gels obtained from cow and goat milk are a consequence of milk’s different composition and properties. The lower texture and viscosity properties of fermented goat’s milk products are the result of their fragile microstructure, less resistant and sensitive to fast deformation and to the less compact, soft and weak acid gels [10,12]. According to Delgado et al. [12] and Park [13] these properties of goat’s milk are related with the lower mean diameter, degree of hydration, mineralization and αs1-casein content in milk and with the smallest diameter of non-protein nitrogen in goat milk in relation to cow milk.
An essential role of calcium ions during the aggregation phase of coagulation process is the interconnection of caseins with the help of calcium bridges. On heat treatment of milk, a portion of the calcium ions is transformed into insoluble calcium phosphate, which is not involved in coagulation processes. Calcium chloride is often added to milk before pasteurization process to restore gel-formation capability [14,15].
According to Szajnar et al. [16] milk and dairy products are the most important sources of calcium intake in a human diet. Dietary calcium absorption from food reaches from 10% to 40% and nearly 32% of Ca is absorbed from milk and dairy products [16,17,18]. The high bioavailability of calcium from dairy products is due to both the ratio of calcium to phosphorus and the presence of numerous components that increase absorption (vitamin D, phosphopeptides released during casein hydrolysis, l-lysine, l-arginine, lactose) [19,20]. The amount of protein consumed affects the body’s calcium balance. The adverse effect of protein on calcium utilization occurs when the ratio of consumed calcium to protein is below 20. For acid curd cheeses, the calcium to protein ratio is between 7 and 12 [21]. Acid-curd cheese is characterized by a lower calcium content in relation to phosphorus, which also contributes to lowering of calcium absorption. This unfavorable calcium to phosphorus ratio is a consequence of acid-curd cheese production technology [20]. Acidification process results in the dissociation of colloidal calcium phosphate which is the main reason for lower calcium content in cheeses coagulated by acidification [22]. During separation of the whey from the cheese curd, up to 80% of the amount of calcium from the milk being processed is lost [20]. A different method that allows to increase the protein utilization in this type of cheese is the calcium-heat-acid coagulation method. It is performed by enriching milk with calcium ions, high pasteurization and coagulation of proteins by the acid method [23,24]. According to Szpendowski et al. [24] during milk heating, the complexes are formed between β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin and casein via disulfide, hydrogen and ionic bonds, in which amorphous calcium phosphate is involved. Whey proteins form stable complexes, mainly with αs1-casein, β-casein and κ-casein fractions. Acid curd cheese made from milk enriched with calcium ions and exposed to high pasteurization has a higher nutritional value of protein in comparison with cheese produced without calcium addition. These studies were performed using cow’s milk, which has a higher heat stability than goat milk [25]. Whey proteins have a higher nutritional value than caseins and the higher nutritional value of cheese produced by calcium-heat-acid coagulation method is partly caused by the denatured whey proteins becoming an integrated part of the cheese [26].
Losses of the ionic calcium during milk pasteurization may be reduces by addition of calcium compounds (lactate, gluconate, chloride) to the milk before pasteurization. Such compounds will acidify the milk therefore increase the risk of protein coagulation during pasteurization [27]. Addition of calcium amino acid chelate will, however, make the milk alkaline. This amino acid chelate consists of glycine and calcium. The ionic ratio of calcium to glycine is 1:2 [28]. Amino acid chelates are a new group of compounds approved for food fortification, however there is no previous research using calcium amino acid chelate to enrich goat’s milk and goat’s milk products. A priority in the enrichment of dairy products is the appropriate selection of the compounds that are carriers of minerals. Moreover, safety and availability for the human body are the features that should be characterized by chemical substances used as carriers of minerals [29]. According to Commission Regulation (EC) No. 953/2009 of 13 October 2009 [30] and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1170/2009 of 30 November 2009 [31] calcium amino acid chelate is commonly used in the manufacture of food supplements and substances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes.
The aim of this research was to evaluate the possibility of using calcium amino acid chelate to produce fresh acid-curd cheese from goat’s milk and determine the migration of mineral compounds from milk to cheese and whey. Moreover, the effect of amino acid chelates on the physical, chemical and organoleptic characteristics of these cheeses and physicochemical properties of whey was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Goat’s Milk Analysis

Raw caprine milk for the production of fresh acid-curd cheese was collected in July directly from an organic farm „Zuza” in Zabratówka village (Podkarpacie region, Poland), from different coloured goats of mixed breeds. The physicochemical and microbiological analysis of the chilled (4 °C) morning milk samples was performed before cheese manufacture. The total bacterial count (TBC) and somatic cell count (SCC) were determined in BactoCount IBC M/SCC semi-automatic counter (Bentley Instruments Inc., Chaska, Minnesota, USA). The chemical composition (protein, fat, lactose, total solids) and freezing point were determined in milk and milk products composition analyzer Bentley B-150 (Bentley Instruments Inc., Chaska, Minnesota, USA) which is based on molecular-bond energy absorptions in the mid-infrared spectrum. The determination of casein was performed by the formol method according to Scott et al. [32], titratable acidity—according to Calamari et al. [33] and density of goat milk was performed in temperature 20 °C according to Raţu et al. [34]. pH value was determined with a digital pH meter Toledo FiveEasy TM (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland).

2.2. Cheese Manufacture

After filtration to remove dirt and foreign particles the goat milk was divided into four batches: (a) CM—control milk without calcium addition, (b) M30—with 30 mg of Ca in 100 g of milk, (c) M35—with 35 mg of Ca in 100 g of milk, (d) M40—with 40 mg of Ca in 100 g of milk and thoroughly mixed. Calcium was added as calcium amino acid chelate Albion® with 26% of Ca concentration (Olimp Laboratories, Dębica, Poland). Each cheese was produced from 5000 g of milk. Control milk and milk enriched with calcium amino acid chelate were pasteurized (85 °C, 5 min). After the heat treatment milk was cooled to 28 °C and each batch of milk was inoculated with 0.20% (w/w) starter culture of mesophilic lactic fermentation bacteria G500—Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis (CSK Food Enrichment, Wageningen, The Netherlands), 15 min prior to addition of 0.02% (v/w) of Beaugel 5 rennet (Coquard, Villefranche sur Saône, France). The rennet strength was 1/3000 with 150 mg of active chymosin per liter. Then the milk was gently mixed and incubated at 28 °C, until the pH reached 4.6 (±0.50) value (approx. 14–16 h). The obtained curds were cut into a cube (15 × 15 × 15 mm), heated in water bath in temperature 35 °C for 1.5 h. The temperature was increased to 40 °C for 0.5 h. Next, the whey was separated with a cheesecloth and collected in a coded glass beakers (CW—control from CM milk, W30—whey from M30, W35—whey from M35, W40—whey from M40) and curds were transferred to molds and pressed (10 N kg−1, 0.5 h) in a press with pneumatic cylinders (Pneumatig, Gdynia, Poland). Acid-curd cheese was cooled to 6 °C and stored in individual plastic containers at the same temperature for 24 h, after which analysis was carried out. Cheese was coded: CC—control cheese from CM milk, C30—cheese from M30 milk, C35—cheese from M35 milk, C40—cheese from M40 milk.

2.3. Physical and Chemical Parameters of Cheese

All physicochemical analyses were run on ground cheese samples to achieve uniformity. The determination of pH was carried out by a digital pH meter Toledo FiveEasy TM (Metler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Titratable acidity was determined in °SH [34]. The fat content was measured according to the Gerber method [35]. The moisture content was calculated using moisture analyzer MA 50.R (Radwag, Radom, Poland), according to Kowalska et al. [36] method. The content of protein in the milk and whey was used to calculate the degree of retention of protein in the cheese, according to Siemianowski et al. [37].

2.4. Acid-Curd Cheese Texture Analysis

Texture profile analysis (TPA) was performed with Brookfield CT3 texture analyzer (Brookfield AMETEK, Middleboro, Massachusetts, USA), controlled by a PC computer, according to Pawlos et al. [38]. With modifications. Cheese samples were cut into a cube (20 × 20 × 20 mm) and stored at a temperature 10 °C ± 1 °C before testing. Penetration testing was carried out using a plastic plunger type TA3/100 (25.4 mm diameter) to the depth of 15 mm at a rate of 5 mm s−1 and press force 1.00 N. The hold time between the first and second compression was 1 s. TPA was used to measure hardness (N), adhesiveness (mJ), cohesiveness and springiness (mm).

2.5. Organoleptic Evaluation of Acid-Curd Cheese

Organoleptic evaluation of cheese was carried out according to the procedure of International Standards ISO4121:2003 [39]. Twenty panelists were selected to evaluate appearance, consistency, taste, odour and overall acceptability on a hedonic scale from 5 to 1 (5—extremely liked, 4—moderately liked, 3—neither liked nor disliked, 2—moderately disliked, 1—extremely disliked).

2.6. Whey Analysis

The determination of pH was carried out by a digital pH meter Toledo FiveEasy TM (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Titratable acidity (°SH) was determined according to Calamari et al. [33]. The chemical composition of whey (protein, fat, lactose) was determined in Bentley B-150 analyzer (Bentley Instruments Inc., Chaska, Minnesota, USA).

2.7. Mineral Composition of Milk, Cheese and Whey

The concentration of macro- and microelements (Ca, K, Mg, P, Mn, Se, Cd and Pb) in milk, cheese and whey was determined by ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma—optical emission spectrometry) method with a spectrophotometer Thermo iCAP Dual 6500 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) according to Znamirowska et al. [40] with modifications (2.50 g of milk, 1.00 g of whey and 0.50 g of cheese were weighed). The ICP-OES instrument was calibrated with standards (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) including concentrations of 10,000 ppm for macroelements and 1000 ppm for microelements. The Certified Reference Material (CRM) was used for validation of analytical methods and the recovery obtained for Ca was 98.00%, for K—99.00%, for Mg—101.00%, for P—98.00%, for Mn—102.00%, for Se—102.00%, for Cd—102.00% and for Pb—97.00%.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed according to Pawlos et al. [38]. From the obtained results the mean, standard deviation and simple correlation coefficient r were worked out statistically in the software Statistica 13.1 (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). A one-way analysis of ANOVA variance was performed and significance of differences between the averages (p ≤ 0.05) was estimated with Tukey’s test. The experiment was repeated three times on different occasions. Four samples were tested for each cheese and whey variant and it was repeated for three cheese making trials.

3. Results

3.1. Quality of Raw Goat’s Milk

The composition and physicochemical characteristic of raw goat’s milk is presented in Table 1. The protein, fat and total solids values were higher than those reported by Barłowska et al. [5], Wolanciuk et al. [41] and Znamirowska et al. [40] for White improved goat breed milk and milk from unidentified goats. The gross chemical composition was, however, in accordance with that reported by Guo et al. [42] for commingled goat milk. The titratable acidity and pH of goat milk was in accordance with results obtained by Domagała and Wszołek [43], Park et al. [2], Strzałkowska et al. [44].
The microbiological and hygienic quality of raw milk were evaluated by TBC and SCC [45,46]. The SCC criteria for goat’s milk were not defined in European Commision Regulation No. 1662/2006 amending Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [47] in the same way as SCC for cow’s milk [45,48,49].Chen et al. [50] divided goat milk into three groups depending on SCC level: <500,000 (low), 500,000 to 1,000,000 (medium), and 1,000,000 to 1,500,000 (high) cells/mL. According to the European Commision Regulation No 1662/2006 [47] in raw goat milk intended for the production of thermized milk or other milk products, the presence of up to 1.5 million of microorganisms in 1 mL is allowed and for products from raw milk the TBC may not exceed 500 000 cfu/mL. According to Park and Haenlein et al. [51] goat milk is produced mainly by apocrine secretion, which results in a large number of cytoplasmic particles (similar in size to somatic cells) and epithelial cells in. Bagnicka et al. [52] reported that about 33% of total SCC in healthy goats’ mammary gland is due to cytoplasmic particles along with fat. Cytoplasmic particles and epithelial cells are, however, not fully differentiated while using an automatic cell counter instead of staining methods [53]. Also for this reason, SCC could be overstated in our research. TBC above 500,000 cfu mL−1 negatively change the quality of milk, when values below 500,000 cfu mL−1 are considered as an indicator of acceptable quality of milk [54,55]. In this study, TBC was below 500,000 cfu mL−1 and SCC was lower than 1 million mL−1, which indicates acceptable microbiological and cytological quality of the milk.
The milk was characterized by a high content of K, P, Ca and Mg (Table 2). Similar content of macroelements was found by Bergillos-Meca et al. [56] for goat milk. The study of Park et al. [2] showed a lower content of Ca, P, K and Mn and a higher Mg and Se content in goat milk compared to our result. Pastuszka et al. [57] determined 189.6 mg 100 g−1 of P, 12.64 mg 100 g−1 of Mg and 8.4 µg 100 g−1 of Mn in goat’s milk. In our study no presence of Cd and Pb was detected in the tested milk.

3.2. Mineral Composition of Acid-Curd Cheese

The mineral composition of the cheeses is shown in Table 3. Enrichment of milk with calcium amino acid chelate resulted in a significant increase in calcium content in cheese (r = 0.9825, p < 0.05). An enrichment of 100 g of goat milk with a 30 mg of Ca resulted in a higher calcium content by 44.54 mg 100 g−1 in C30 cheese in compared to the control cheese. Increasing the calcium dose to 35 mg in 100 g of goat milk increased the amount of Ca in C35 cheese by 95.2 mg 100 g−1. Therefore, the enrichment of goat milk with 40 mg of Ca increased the Ca content in cheese by only 99.58 mg compared to CC cheese. The goat milk used in this study had a high K content, reflected in a high K content in the cheese. According to Raynal-Ljutovac et al. [58] concentrations of K and Mg in cheese, which are basically soluble, decrease as dry matter increases during pressing or ageing process. Control cheese showed a higher Ca content by approx.16 mg 100 g−1 than the goat cheese in study by Raynal-Ljutovac et al. [58] and 29 mg 100 g−1 higher than values published by Baran et al. [59]. Barłowska et al. [5] and Pastuszka et al. [57] confirms that goat’s milk and its products are a valuable source of K, Ca, Cu and Mn. The enrichment of milk with Ca did not significantly affect the content of Mg, P, Mn and Se in the cheeses. In the research of Baran et al. [59] a lower Mg content was found in acidic goat cheeses (11.94 mg 100 g−1), while higher content was observed in goat acidic-rennet cheeses (19.29 mg 100 g−1) compared to our cheeses. In all goat cheeses the selenium content was 1 µg 100 g−1. According to Allen and Miller [60], most of selenium remains in the unbound ionic form in goat milk and does not bind to proteins at normal pH of milk. However, when the pH value decreases below 6.0, a part of the selenium may be bound by the casein fraction. Our studies do not confirm this observation. Selenium is absorbed by the plants from the soil and then converted into organic forms of this element, which are incorporated into proteins [61]. According to Pizzoferrato [62] this element is concentrated in cheese by the drying (ripening) effect. As in milk, Cd and Pb were not found in cheeses either.

3.3. Physicochemical Properties and Texture of Cheese

Table 4 presents the acidity, chemical composition and selected texture parameters of fresh goat cheeses as a function of on the quantity of calcium added to the processed milk. Enrichment of goat’s milk with calcium amino acid chelate causes alkalization of milk before fermentation [16]. This phenomenon was also observed in the present study, because in cheese C30, C35 and C40 a significantly higher pH value and lower titratable acidity were determined in comparison with CC cheese. These relationships were confirmed by significant correlation coefficients. Janštová et al. [63] showed that the pH value in fresh goat cheeses was in the range from 4.75 to 5.12. Cankurt [64] determined the pH in the range from 4.81 to 4.94 in white cheese on the first day of storage. However, in the studies of Asteri et al. [65] the pH of fresh goat cheeses on the first day of storage was 4.65.
Considering the content of water, fat and protein retention in fresh goat cheese, depending on the amount of calcium added to milk, a higher protein retention and water content in C30, C35, C40 cheese were found compared to CC cheese. The increase of protein content in cheeses made from milk enriched with calcium amino acid chelate could be the result of the interaction between casein and whey proteins during milk high-pasteurization thermal process. A significantly higher moisture content and lower fat content was found in cheeses with calcium amino acid chelate. Control cheese had the lowest water content, which resulted in the highest hardness, springiness and cohesion (Table 4). Moreover, the increase of moisture content and decrease of hardness of acid-curd cheese with calcium addition could affect the cheese yield.
Enrichment of milk with calcium amino acid chelate significantly reduced cheese hardness with exception of cheese from C30. With increasing calcium dose, the hardness decreased, which is connected with increased amount of moisture in the cheese (r = −0.8285, p < 0.05). A stronger correlation was calculated between the calcium dose and cheese springiness (r = −0.9441, p < 0.05). According to Walia et al. [66] the adhesiveness definition is “the force needed to displace the material that adheres to the mouth during eating”. In this study, it was shown that cheese made from calcium enriched milk had higher adhesiveness than control cheese. A significant correlation coefficient was also calculated (r = −0.9395, p < 0.05), which confirms the effect of enrichment with calcium on cheese adhesiveness.

3.4. Organoleptic Evaluation of Acid-Curd Cheese

An organoleptic evaluation of cheese was carried out and the results are presented in Table 5. CC cheese was characterized by an even white colour, milky and slightly acidic taste, goaty taste, fermentation odour with perceptible diacetyl odour and a homogeneous consistency. The control cheese was the most acceptable and the panelists gave it the highest scores. During the appearance evaluation, the colour of the acid-curd cheeses was also taken into consideration. Cheeses produced from milk enriched with calcium amino acid chelate were characterized by a darker colour resulting from the gray colour of the Albion additive. Cheeses with calcium amino acid chelate were less acidic and had a low perceptible fermentation odour, which could be related to higher pH value and lower titratable acidity (Table 4). In cheeses made from the milk enriched with calcium amino acid chelate no goaty taste were observed, which was the case in the control cheeses. Znamirowska et al. [67] study showed that the addition of mineral compounds reduced the intensity of goat and sour taste in goat milk yoghurts during 21 days of cold storage. Cheeses with calcium amino acid chelate had a softer and more smeary texture than the control cheese. Softness of the cheese is also confirmed by the results of instrumental texture measurements, as the hardness in cheeses with calcium amino acid chelate was significantly lower than in control cheese. In cheeses with calcium amino acid chelate, a higher water content and relatively less fat was found, and these parameters shape the consistency of the cheeses. The compounds responsible for goaty flavour have been attributed to the presence of 4-methyloctanoic, 4-ethyloctanoic, hexanoic, octanoic, nonanoic and decanoic acids [68,69]. Previous research indicates, however, that there are more than 80 compounds which determine the fresh goat cheese flavour [70]. These include neutral basic compounds, like aldehydes, ketones, heat-induced sugar products, lactones, and animal/fecal compounds together with various fatty acids. Moreover, the “goaty” taste is also related to the presence of short-chain fatty acids (caproic, caprylic, and capric acids), which have higher concentrations than in the cow’s milk [2,71].

3.5. Physicochemical Properties of Whey

Whey presents 80–90% of the volume of milk for cheese making and is the major by-product. According to Moreno-Indias et al. [72] and Yang et al. [73] whey from acid cheese production contains about 4.5% (w/v) lactose, 0.8% (w/v) protein, 1% (w/v) salts, and 0.1 to 0.8% (w/v) lactic acid. The physicochemical properties of goat acid whey are presented in Table 6. The lowest pH value was determined in the control whey (CW), while in the whey W30. W35 and W40 the pH was significantly higher. However, the inverse relationship was observed for titratable acidity. The acid whey obtained in this research was characterized by a low content of protein and with increasing calcium enrichment a low concentration of protein was observed (r = −0.9173, p < 0.05). Some of the whey proteins have been attached to casein and remained in the cheese. Enrichment with calcium amino acid chelate increased the fat content in the whey and reduced the concentration of fat in the cheese. The fat content in the whey varied from 0.25 g 100 g−1 (CW) to 0.60 g 100 g−1 (W40) which are in accordance with Popović-Vranješ et al. [74]. Considering the lactose content in acid whey, it should be stated that adding of calcium amino acid chelate had a beneficial effect on lactose fermentation level in whey W40. This probably indicates that calcium amino acid chelate stimulated the growth of mesophilic bacteria that used lactose for fermentation.

3.6. Mineral Composition of Whey

Table 7 presents the mineral composition of acid whey obtained during the cheese production from goat milk enriched with calcium amino acid chelate. The calcium concentration in whey increased with the increasing dose of calcium amino acid chelate (r = 0.8939, p < 0.05). It shows that only part of the calcium was bound to the micelles and remained in the cheese. The concentration of K and Mg were higher than those obtained by Baran et al. [59], who determined in goat acid whey 162.65 mg 100 g−1 of K and 17.29 mg 100 g−1 of Mg. According to Raynal-Ljutovac et al. [58] during the production of cheese Rocamadour, Ste Maure and Babia Laciana the strong and early decrease in pH appearing throughout coagulation make Ca, P and Zn (mainly bound to caseins) soluble and is lost in the whey during the draining process. In our studies, goat whey contained small amounts of P and Mn, while Se was determined only in whey W35 and W40 enriched with calcium amino acid chelate.

4. Conclusions

Calcium amino acid chelate may be used to enrich goat’s milk to produce fresh acid-curd cheese. The addition of calcium amino acid chelate does not cause acidification of the milk but a slight alkalization, which increases the thermal stability of goat milk proteins. Fresh acid-curd goat cheese with calcium amino acid chelate had a higher protein retention, a higher moisture content and lower fat content. More fat was separated with the whey when calcium amino acid chelate was added to the milk. Enrichment with 30 mg of Ca in 100 g of goat milk increased the calcium content in cheese by 28% in comparison to the control sample. Increasing the calcium dose to 35 mg (in 100 g of processed milk) increased the calcium concentration in cheese by 60.5%. However, the enrichment of goat milk with 40 mg Ca (in 100 g of processed milk) increased the calcium content in cheese by only 63.29%. Enrichment with calcium amino acid chelate did not significantly influenced the content of K, Mg, P and Mn in cheeses and whey. In cheeses made from the milk with calcium amino acid chelate there was no goaty taste, which was perceptible in the control cheese. The cheeses with calcium addition also had a softer and more smeary consistency. Reducing the intensity of goaty and sour taste by the application of calcium amino acid chelate is very important information for goat’s milk processing industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and A.Z.; methodology, M.P. and G.Z.; software, M.B.; validation, M.P., A.Z., G.Z. and M.B.; formal analysis, M.P. and A.Z.; investigation, M.P. and M.B.; resources, M.P.; data curation, M.P. and A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and A.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.P., A.Z. and M.B.; supervision, A.Z.; project administration, A.Z.; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the program of the MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION under the name “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in the years 2019–2022, project number 026/RID/2018/19, the amount of funding PLN 9 542 500.00. Projekt finansowany w ramach programu Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego pod nazwą „Regionalna Inicjatywa Doskonałości” w latach 2019-2022, nr projektu 026/RID/2018/19, kwota finansowania 9 542 500,00 zł. [026/RID/2018/19].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Republic of Poland) program Regional Initiative of Excellence for the University of Rzeszow, No. 026/RID/2018/19.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clark, S.; Mora Garcia, M.B. A 100-Year Review: Advances in goat milk research. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 10026–10044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park, Y.W.; Juarez, M.; Ramos, M.; Haenlein, G.F.W. Physico-chemical characteristic of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 68, 88–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Villa, C.; Costa, J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.; Mafra, I. Bovine Milk Allergens: A Comprehensive Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 137–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Monaci, L.; Tregoat, V.; van Hengel, A.J.; Anklam, E. Milk allergens, their characteristics and their detection in food: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 223, 149–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barłowska, J.; Wolanciuk, A.; Kędzierska-Matysek, M.; Litwińczuk, Z. Wpływ sezonu produkcji na podstawowy skład chemiczny oraz zawartość makro- i mikroelementów w mleku krowim i kozim. Effect of production season on basic chemical composition and content of macro- and microelements in cow’s and goat’s milk. Zywnosc-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2013, 91, 69–78. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danków, R.; Pikul, J. Przydatność technologiczna mleka koziego do przetwórstwa. Technological suitability of goat milk for processing. Nauk. Przyr. Technol. 2011, 5, 1–15. Available online: https://www.npt.up-poznan.net/pub/art_5_6.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  7. Mehaia, M.A. Manufacture of fresh soft white cheese (Domiati-type) from ultrafiltered goat’s milk. Food Chem. 2002, 79, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Żylińska, J.; Siemianowski, K.; Bohdziewicz, K.; Pawlikowska, K.; Kołakowski, P.; Szpendowski, J.; Bardowski, J. Kultury starterowe do produkcji twarogów kwasowych—Rola i oczekiwania. Starter cultures for acid curd—Role and expectations. Postep. Mikrobiol. 2014, 53, 288–298. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  9. Da Silva Bonfim, V.; da Costa Pereira, M. Influence of Processing on Rheological and Textural Characteristic of Goat and Sheep Milk Beverages and Methods of Analysis. Process. Sustain. Beverages 2019, 2, 373–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Domagała, J. Instrumental Texture, Syneresis, and Microstructure of Yoghurts Prepared from Ultrafiltrated Goat Milk: Effect of Degree of Concentration. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 15, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miocinovic, J.; Miloradovic, Z.; Josipovic, M.; Nedeljkovic, A.; Radovanovic, M.; Pudja, P. Rheological and textural properties of goat and cow milk set type yoghurts. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 58, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Delgado, K.F.; da Silva Frasao, B.; da Costa, M.P.; Junior, C.A.C. Different Alternatives to Improve Rheological and Textural Characteristics of Fermented Goat Products—A Review. Rheology 2017, 1, 106. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park, Y.W. Rheological characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 68, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moudrá, K.; Pachlová, V.; Černíková, M.; Šopík, T.; Buňka, F. The combined effects of fat content, calcium chloride, and coagulant concentration on the development of cheese curd structure. Int. Dairy J. 2017, 73, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soodam, K.; Ong, L.; Powell, I.B.; Kentish, S.E.; Gras, S.L. Effect of calcium chloride addition and draining pH on the microstructure and texture of full fat Cheddar cheese during ripening. Food Chem. 2015, 181, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Szajnar, K.; Znamirowska, A.; Kalicka, D.; Zaguła, G. Fortification of yoghurts with calcium compounds. J. Elem. 2017, 22, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Greenberg, J.A.; Chow, G.; Ziegelstein, R.C. Caffeinated coffee consumption, cardiovascular disease, and heart valve disease in the elderly (from the Framingham Study). Prev. Cardiol. 2008, 102, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weaver, C.M. The role of nutrition on optimizing peak bone mass. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 17, 135–137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guéguen, L.; Pointillart, A. The bioavailability of dietary calcium. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2000, 19, 119S–136S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Siemianowski, K.; Szpendowski, J. Możliwość zwiększania zawartości wapnia w serach twarogowych w świetle dotychczasowych badań. Possibilities of Tvarog cheeses enrichment with calcium in the light of hitherto existing research. Nauk. Inż. Technol. 2012, 4, 83–98. Available online: https://dbc.wroc.pl/Content/22852/Siemianowski_Mozliwosci_Zwiekszania_Zawartosci_Wapnia_w_Serach_2012.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  21. da Silva Oselame, C.; de Matos, O.; Oselame, G.B.; Borba Neves, E. Analysis of total calorie, calcium and protein intake and relationship with bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Rev. Bras. Geriatr. Gerontol. 2016, 19, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Li, Q.; Zhao, Z. Acid and rennet-induced coagulation behavior of casein micelles with modified structure. Food Chem. 2019, 291, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schokker, E.P.; Singh, H.; Creamer, L.K. Heat-inducted aggregation of β-lactoglobulin A and B with α-lactoalbumin. Int. Dairy J. 2000, 10, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szpendowski, J.; Kłobukowski, J.; Prokop, E. Wpływ dodatku chlorku wapnia i ogrzewania mleka na skład chemiczny serów twarogowych. The effect of calcium chloride added to milk and milk heating on the chemical composition of cottage cheeses. Zywnosc-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2005, 3, 36–45. Available online: http://wydawnictwo.pttz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/03_Szpendowski1.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  25. Ziarno, M.; Zaręba, D.; Piskorz, J. Wzbogacanie maślanki w wapń, magnez oraz białka serwatkowe. Fortifying buttermilk with calcium, magnesium, and whey proteins. Zywnosc-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2009, 2, 14–27. Available online: http://wydawnictwo.pttz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/02_Ziarno.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  26. Sindayikengera, S.; Wen-Shui, X. Nutritional evaluation of caseins and whey proteins and their hydrolysates from Protamex. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2006, 7, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Jaworski, J.; Kuncewicz, A. Właściwości fizykochemiczne mleka. Physicochemical properties of milk. In Mleczarstwo; Ziajka, S., Ed.; UWM: Olsztyn, Poland, 2007; pp. 53–99. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  28. Ashmead, H.D. Amino Acid Chelation in Human and Animal Nutrition; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pawlos, M.; Znamirowska, A.; Szajnar, K.; Kalicka, D. The influence of the dose of calcium amino acid chelate on physicochemical properties, sensory analysis and texture profile of kefirs during 21 days of cold storage. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2016, 15, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Commission Regulation (EC) No 953/2009 of 13 October 2009 on substances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes in foods for particular nutritional uses (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, L269, 216–226. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009R0953&from=EN (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  31. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1170/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of Council and Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the lists of vitamin and minerals and their forms that can be added to foods, including food supplements (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, L314, 36–42. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal=-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009R1170&from=EN (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  32. Scott., J.E.; Robinson, R.K.; Wilbey, R. Cheesemaking Practice, 3rd ed.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1998; p. 91. [Google Scholar]
  33. Calamari, L.; Gobbi, L.; Paolo, B. Improving the prediction ability of FT-MIR spectroscopy to assess titratable acidity in cow’s milk. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Raţu, R.N.; Usturoi, M.G.; Avarvarei, B.V. Quality of Raw Cow Milk Utilised In Cheese Processing. Lucr. Ştiinţifice Ser. Zooteh. 2015, 63, 128–130. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mleko i Przetwory Mleczarskie Sery Metody Badań. Milk and Dairy Products Cheeses Methods of Analysis; PN-A-86232:1973; Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warszawa, Poland, 1973. (In Polish)
  36. Kowalska, M.; Janas, S.; Woźniak, M. Innovative application of the moisture analyzer for determination of dry mass content of processed cheese. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 54, 3071–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Siemianowski, K.; Szpendowski, J.; Bohdziewicz, K.; Kołakowski, P.; Pawlikowska, K.; Żylińska, J.; Bardowski, J.K. Wpływ zawartości suchej masy w mleku na skład oraz cechy sensoryczne twarogu kwasowego. Effect of the dry matter content in milk on the composition and sensory properties of acid Tvarog cheese. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric. Aliment. Pisc. Zootech. 2013, 302, 113–124. Available online: http://wydawnictwo.pttz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/12_Siemianowski.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  38. Pawlos, M.; Znamirowska, A.; Kluz, M.; Szajnar, K.; Kowalczyk, M. Low-lactose fermented goat milks with Bifidobacterium animals ssp. lactis Bb-12. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2020, 9, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sensory Analysis—Guidelines for the Use of Quantitative Response Scales; ISO 4121:2003; International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
  40. Znamirowska, A.; Szajnar, K.; Pawlos, M. Organic magnesium salts fortification in fermented goat’s milk. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1615–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wolanciuk, A.; Barłowska, J.; Pastuszka, R.; Topyła, B. Podstawowy skład chemiczny i wybrane parametry tłuszczu mleka koziego z okresu żywienia letniego i jesienno-zimowego. Basic chemical composition and the selected fat parameters of caprine milk from summer and autumn-winter feeding period. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 2013, 9, 63–70. Available online: http://ptz.icm.edu.pl/download/2013/tom_9_2/VI%2520Wolanciuk.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  42. Guo, M.R.; Dixon, P.H.; Park, Y.W.; Gilmore, J.A.; Kindstedt, P.S. Seasonal Changes in the Chemical Composition of Commingled Goat Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, E79–E83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Domagała, J.; Wszołek, M. Wpływ sposobu zagęszczania oraz rodzaju szczepionki na teksturę i podatność na synerezę jogurtu i biojogurtów z mleka koziego. Effect of concentration method and starter culture type on the texture and susceptibility to syneresis of yoghurt and bio-yoghurts made of goat’s milk. Zywnosc-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2008, 15, 118–126. Available online: http://wydawnictwo.pttz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/11_Domagala.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020). (In Polish).
  44. Strzałkowska, N.; Jóźwik, A.; Bagnicka, E.; Krzyżewski, J.; Horbańczuk, K.; Pyzel, B.; Horbańczuk, J.O. Chemical composition, physical traits and fatty acid profile of goat milk as related to the stage of lactation. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2009, 27, 311–320. Available online: http://archiwum.ighz.edu.pl/files/objects/7512/66/str311-320.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  45. Haenlein, G.F. Relationship of somatic cell counts in goat milk to mastitis and productivity. Small Rumin. Res. 2002, 45, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kyozaire, J.K.; Veary, C.M.; Petzer, I.M.; Donkin, E.F. Microbiological quality of goat’s milk obtained under different production systems. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2005, 76, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1662/2006 of 6 November 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L320, 1–10. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006R1662&from=EN (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  48. Park, Y.W.; Humphrey, R.D. Bacterial Cell Counts in Goat Milk and Their Correlations with Somatic Cell Counts, Percent Fat, and Protein. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teleb, D.F.; Youssef, H.F.H.; El-Baz, A.M. Relationship between Somatic Cell Count and Udder Health in Damascus Goats. Egypt. J. Sheep Goat Sci. 2014, 9, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, S.X.; Wang, J.Z.; Van Kessel, J.S.; Ren, F.Z.; Zeng, S.S. Effect of somatic cell count in goat milk on yield, sensory quality, and fatty acid profile of semisoft cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Park, Y.W.; Haenlein, G.F.W. Goat Milk, Its Products and Nutrition. In Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 449–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bagnicka, E.; Winnicka, A.; Jóźwik, A.; Rzewuska, M.; Strzałkowska, N.; Kościuczuk, E.; Prusak, B.; Kaba, J.; Horbańczuk, J.; Krzyżewski, J. Relationship between somatic cell count and bacterial pathogens in goat milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 100, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pazzola, M.; Balia, F.; Carcangiu, V.; Dettori, M.L.; Piras, G.; Vacca, G.M. Higher somatic cells counted by the electronic counter method do not influence renneting properties of goat milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2002, 102, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boyazoglu, J.; Morand-Fehr, P. Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their quality. Small Rumin. Res. 2001, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pirisi, A.; Piredda, G.; Corona, M.; Pes, M.; Pintus, S.; Ledda, A. Influence of somatic cell count on ewe’s milk composition, cheese yield and cheese quality. In Proceedings of the Sixth Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2–4 November 2000; pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bergillos-Meca, T.; Cabrera-Vique, C.; Artacho, R.; Moreno-Montoro, M.; Navarro-Alarcón, M.; Olalla, M.; Giménez, R.; Ruiz-López, M.D. Influence of milk ultrafiltration on Ca, Mg, Zn and P levels in fermented goats’ milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 124, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pastuszka, R.; Barłowska, J.; Litwińczuk, Z. Walory odżywcze i prozdrowotne mleka koziego. Nutritional value and health-promoting properties of goat milk. Med. Wet. 2015, 71, 480–485. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. Raynal-Ljutovac, K.; Lagriffoul, G.; Paccard, P.; Guillet, I.; Chilliard, Y. Composition of goat and sheep milk products: An update. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 79, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baran, J.; Pieczonka, W.; Pompa-Roborzyński, M. Składniki mineralne w serach i w serwatce otrzymanych z mleka owczego i koziego. Mineral components in cheeses and whey made from ewe’s and goat’s milk. Zywnosc-Nauka Technol. Jakosc 2011, 78, 132–140. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Allen, J.C.; Miller, W.J. Selenium Binding and Distribution in Goat and Cow Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1980, 63, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pechova, A.; Misurova, L.; Pavlata, L.; Dvorak, R. Monitoring of Changes in Selenium Concentration in Goat Milk during Short-Term Supplementation of Various Forms of Selenium. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 121, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pizzoferrato, L. Selenium: Positive and negative aspects. Caseus Int. 2002, 4, 84–86. [Google Scholar]
  63. Janštová, B.; Dračková, M.; Cupáková, Š.; Přidalová, H.; Pospíšilová, M.; Karpíšková, R.; Vorlová, L. Safety and Quality of Farm Fresh Goat’s Cheese in the Czech Republic. Czech J. Food Sci. 2010, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Cankurt, H. The Effects of Adding Different Stabilizers in Brine on the Physicochemical, Sensory, Microbiological and Textural Properties of White Cheese. Foods 2019, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Asteri, I.A.; Kittaki, N.; Tsakalidou, E. The effect of wild lactic acid bacteria on the production of goat’s milk soft cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2010, 63, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Walia, A.; Mishra, N.; Pradyuman, K. Effect of Fermentation on Physicochemical, Textural Properties and Yoghurt Bacteria in Mango Soy Fortified Yoghurt. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2013, 7, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Znamirowska, A.; Szajnar, K.; Pawlos, M.; Kalicka, D. Effect of Magnesium D-Gluconate Fortification on Heat Stability of Goat’s Milk and Physicochemical Properties, Sensory Characteristic and Texture Profile of Yoghurts during Cold Storage. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Salles, C.; Sommerer, N.; Septier, C.; Issanchou, S.; Chabanet, C.; Garem, A.; Le Quere, J.L. Goat Cheese Flavor: Sensory Evaluation of Branched-Chain Fatty Acids and Small Peptides. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Talavera, M.; Chambers, D.H. Flavor lexicon and characteristics of artisan goat cheese from the United States. J. Sens. Stud. 2016, 31, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Carunchia Whetstine, M.E.; Parker, J.D.; Drake, M.A.; Larick, D.K. Determining Flavor and Flavor Variability in Commercially Produced Liquid Cheddar Whey. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Mayer, H.K.; Fiechter, G. Physical and chemical characteristics of sheep and goat milk in Austria. Int. Dairy J. 2012, 24, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moreno-Indias, I.; Castro, N.; Morales-delaNuez, A.; Sánchez-Macías, D.; Assunção, P.; Capote, J.; Argüello, A. Farm and factory production of goat cheese whey results in distinct chemical composition. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 4792–4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Yang, S.T.; Zhu, H.; Li, Y.; Hong, G. Continuous propionate production from whey permeate using a novel fibrous bed bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 43, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Popović Vranješ, A.; Krstović, S.; Kasalica, A.; Jurakić, Ž.; Štrbac, L.; Strugar, K.; Šaran, M. Quality of Milk for Cheese Production on Registered Agricultural Holdings in Vojvodina. Contemp. Agric. 2017, 66, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Composition and physicochemical characteristic of raw goat’s milk.
Table 1. Composition and physicochemical characteristic of raw goat’s milk.
PropertiesMean ± SD 1Min 2 − Max 3
TBC 4, cfu mL−1269,800 ± 17,310249,600 − 291,120
SCC 5, in 1 mL910,000 ± 32,840870,310 − 943,940
Density, g mL−11.030 ± 0.011.029 − 1.031
Freezing point, °C−0.574 ± 0.05−0.634 − 0.524
pH6.62 ± 0.036.59 − 6.68
Titratable acidity, °SH6.70 ± 0.056.63 − 6.76
Protein, g 100 g−14.02 ± 0.043.98 − 4.08
Casein, g 100 g−13.29 ± 0.023.25 − 3.31
Fat, g 100 g−14.03 ± 0.073.95 − 4.12
Lactose, g 100 g−14.49 ± 0.094.39 − 4.59
Total solids, g 100 g−112.98 ± 0.0112.95 − 12.99
1 SD—standard deviation. 2 Min—minimum value. 3 Max—maximum value. 4 TBC—total bacterial count. 5 SCC—somatic cell count. n = 12.
Table
Table 2. Mineral composition of raw goat’s milk.
Table 2. Mineral composition of raw goat’s milk.
Mineral CompoundMean ± SD 1Min 2 − Max 3
Ca, mg 100 g−1183.57 ± 0.72180.90 − 184.52
K, mg 100 g−1220.68 ± 1.07219.01 − 222.00
Mg, mg 100 g−114.61 ± 0.0414.55 − 14.65
P, mg 100 g−1134.71 ± 3.91130.80 − 139.54
Mn, µg 100 g−16.00 ± 1.005.00 − 7.00
Se, µg 100 g−12.00 ± 1.500.49 − 3.50
Cd, mg 100 g−1ND 4-
Pb, mg 100 g−1ND 4-
1 SD—standard deviation. 2 Min—minimum value. 3 Max—maximum value. 4 ND—not detected. n = 12.
Table
Table 3. Mineral composition of acid-curd cheese.
Table 3. Mineral composition of acid-curd cheese.
Mineral CompoundCheese Typer
CCC30C35C40
Ca, mg 100 g−1157.34 a ± 1.17201.88 b ± 1.65252.54 c ± 5.06256.58 c ± 0.320.9825 *
K, mg 100 g−1174.42 a ± 1.57175.94 a ± 1.22175.83 a ± 0.67175.57 a ± 2.370.0710
Mg, mg 100 g−119.70 a ± 0.8419.89 a ± 0.7420.50 a ± 0.7520.83 a ± 0.880.5843
P, mg 100 g−1161.43 a ± 2.62168.57 a ± 3.17167.98 a ± 1.25164.46 a ± 2.560.5894
Mn, µg 100 g−16.00 a ± 2.006.00 a ± 2.006.00 a ± 3.006.00 a ± 3.00−0.0399
Se, µg 100 g−11.00 a ± 1.001.00 a ± 1.001.00 a ± 1.001.00 a ± 0.00−0.0361
Cd, mg 100 g−1NDNDNDND-
Pb, mg 100 g−1NDNDNDND-
Mean ± standard deviation. a–c Means with different letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. r—correlation coefficient. *—statistically significant at p < 0.05. CC—control cheese made from CM milk (n = 12). C30—cheese from M30 milk (n = 12). C35—cheese from M35 milk (n = 12). C40—cheese from M40 milk (n = 12). ND—not detected.
Table
Table 4. Physicochemical and texture properties of acid-curd cheese.
Table 4. Physicochemical and texture properties of acid-curd cheese.
PropertiesCheese Typer
CCC30C35C40
pH4.63 a ± 0.024.81 b ± 0.014.83 b ± 0.024.83 b ± 0.020.9861 *
Titratable acidity, °SH58.23 c ± 1.0752.41 b ± 0.6248.82 a ± 0.5648.38 a ± 0.10−0.9668 *
Protein retention, %73.86 a ± 0.0875.44 b ± 0.1275.85 c ± 0.0776.51 d ± 0.260.9759 *
Fat, g 100 g−120.00 c ± 0.8719.50 b ± 0.5015.67 a ± 0.2915.07 a ± 0.31−0.7674 *
Moisture, g 100 g−157.39 a ± 0.1161.48 b ± 0.8566.81 c ± 1.6070.67 d ± 0.570.8801 *
Hardness, N3.61 c ± 0.183.24 c ± 0.202.45 b ± 0.051.95 a ± 0.21−0.8285 *
Cohesiveness0.23 c ± 0.010.20 c ± 0.020.10 b ± 0.020.05 a ± 0.03−0.8174 *
Springiness, mm3.40 c ± 0.062.13 b ± 0.201.97 b ± 0.171.06 a ± 0.06−0.9441 *
Adhesiveness, mJ4.30 a ± 0.355.60 b ± 0.265.70 b ± 0.105.70 b ± 0.10−0.9395 *
Mean ± standard deviation. a–d Means with different letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. r—correlation coefficient. *—statistically significant at p < 0.05. CC—control cheese made from CM milk (n = 12). C30—cheese from M30 milk (n = 12). C35—cheese from M35 milk (n = 12). C40—cheese from M40 milk (n = 12).
Table
Table 5. Organoleptic evaluation of acid-curd cheese.
Table 5. Organoleptic evaluation of acid-curd cheese.
PropertiesCheese Typer
CCC30C35C40
Overall acceptability4.90 b ± 0.104.86 a, b ± 0.174.86 a, b ± 0.174.51 a ± 0.15−0.8430 *
Apperance4.80 b ± 0.204.60 a, b ± 0.414.60 a, b ± 0.294.25 a ± 0.48−0.6214 *
Consistency4.90 b ± 0.104.80 b ± 0.254.80 b ± 0.414.40 a ± 0.41−0.6429 *
Taste4.50 a ± 0.204.80 b ± 0.154.80 b ± 0.154.75 a ± 0.290.6956 *
Odour5.00 a ± 0.004.88 a ± 0.254.90 a ± 0.254.88 a ± 0.25−0.2515
Mean ± standard deviation. a–b Means with different letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. r—correlation coefficient. *—statistically significant at p < 0.05. CC—control cheese made from CM milk (n = 40). C30—cheese from M30 milk (n = 40). C35—cheese from M35 milk (n = 40). C40—cheese from M40 milk (n = 40).
Table
Table 6. Physicochemical properties of goat acid whey.
Table 6. Physicochemical properties of goat acid whey.
PropertiesWhey Typer
CWW30W35W40
pH4.72 a ± 0.014.87 b ± 0.014.88 b, c ± 0.014.89 c ± 0.010.8939 *
Titratable acidity, °SH37.40 b ± 0.2035.00 a ± 0.2035.07 a ± 0.8334.27 a ± 0.760.9897 *
Protein, g 100 g−11.05 c ± 0.010.99 b ± 0.010.97 b ± 0.010.94 a ± 0.01−0.9173 *
Fat, g 100 g−10.25 a ± 0.010.39 b ± 0.010.43 c ± 0.010.60 d ± 0.01−0.9751 *
Lactose, g 100 g−14.07 b ± 0.014.06 b ± 0.014.06 b ± 0.013.85 a ± 0.010.8876 *
Mean ± standard deviation. a–d Means with different letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. r—correlation coefficient. *—statistically significant at p < 0.05. CW—control from CM milk (n = 12). W30—whey from M30 (n = 12). W35—whey from M35 (n = 12). W40—whey from M40 (n = 12).
Table
Table 7. Mineral composition of goat whey.
Table 7. Mineral composition of goat whey.
Mineral CompoundWhey Typer
CWW30W35W40
Ca, mg 100 g−1156.15 a ± 0.11188.08 b ± 1.62206.54 c ± 2.95212.06 d ± 2.090.8939 *
K, mg 100 g−1197.23 a ± 2.26198.54 a ± 1.06199.30 a ± 2.08200.06 a ± 2.890.4822
Mg, mg 100 g−124.23 a ± 0.4124.57 a ± 0.1825.59 a ± 0.0325.60 a ± 0.330.5911
Mn, µg 100 g−15.00 a ± 1.015.00 a ± 1.024.00 a ± 1.034.00 a ± 1.01−0.4153
P, mg 100 g−196.59 a ± 1.2496.52 a ± 1.6695.39 a ± 3.7795.24 a ± 1.740.3318
Se, µg 100 g−1NDND1.00 a ± 0.001.00 a ± 0.000.2679
Cd, mg 100 g−1NDNDNDND-
Pb, mg 100 g−1NDNDNDND-
Mean ± standard deviation. a–d Means with different letters in rows indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. r—correlation coefficient. *—statistically significant at p < 0.05. CW—control from CM milk (n = 12). W30—whey from M30 (n = 12). W35—whey from M35 (n = 12). W40—whey from M40 (n = 12). ND—not detected.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pawlos, M.; Znamirowska, A.; Zaguła, G.; Buniowska, M. Use of Calcium Amino Acid Chelate in the Production of Acid-Curd Goat Cheese. Foods 2020, 9, 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9080994

AMA Style

Pawlos M, Znamirowska A, Zaguła G, Buniowska M. Use of Calcium Amino Acid Chelate in the Production of Acid-Curd Goat Cheese. Foods. 2020; 9(8):994. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9080994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pawlos, Małgorzata, Agata Znamirowska, Grzegorz Zaguła, and Magdalena Buniowska. 2020. "Use of Calcium Amino Acid Chelate in the Production of Acid-Curd Goat Cheese" Foods 9, no. 8: 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9080994

APA Style

Pawlos, M., Znamirowska, A., Zaguła, G., & Buniowska, M. (2020). Use of Calcium Amino Acid Chelate in the Production of Acid-Curd Goat Cheese. Foods, 9(8), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9080994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop