3. Result
This study involved 29,036 participants who underwent COVID-19 vaccination with doses 1, 2, and booster 1 at the RSCM. During the first dose vaccination period, 10,586 doses were administered, with 10,029 doses administered during the second dose period, and 8421 doses were given during the first booster period. The most widely administered type of COVID-19 vaccine was the inactive vaccine, Coronavac, accounting for 20,613 doses (70.99%), followed by mRNA vaccines, including 8420 doses of Moderna (28.99%) and 3 doses of Pfizer (0.01%) (
Figure 1).
In this study, from the total number of doses of the COVID-19 vaccine that were given to the participants for doses 1, 2, and the first booster, it was found that 44 participants receiving the COVID-19 vaccine experienced hypersensitivity reactions (0.15%). Most hypersensitivity reactions occurred in the female gender group, with 35 participants (79.5%), while 9 individuals (20.5%) were male. Age characteristics were dominated by those below 50 years of age, with 37 individuals (84.1%), and the group above 50 years of age had 7 individuals (15.9%).
A total of 20,613 doses of the Coronavac vaccine were administered during the COVID-19 vaccination across the first dose, second dose, and first booster periods. It was reported that 20 participants (0.09%) receiving the Coronavac vaccine experienced hypersensitivity reactions. The first dose period had the highest number of hypersensitivity reactions (n = 13), and the second dose period had 7 cases. In contrast, no hypersensitivity reactions were found during the first booster period during Coronavac vaccination.
A total of 8420 doses of the Moderna vaccine were administered during the vaccination periods for doses 1, 2, and the first booster. The total occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions to the Moderna vaccine was 0.309%. The period with the highest occurrence of Moderna vaccine hypersensitivity reactions was during the first booster dose (n = 23), with just 1 case in the first dose period. In contrast, no hypersensitivity reactions were found during the second dose period. No reports of hypersensitivity reactions to the Pfizer vaccine were found. However, the assessment of hypersensitivity reaction incidents to the Pfizer vaccine could not be evaluated because the number of doses given was not the same as the number of doses of other COVID-19 vaccines. The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in vaccine recipients at the RSCM using mRNA vaccines (n = 24) was higher than that with the Coronavac vaccine (n = 20).
Out of the 44 COVID-19 vaccine recipients who experienced hypersensitivity reactions, the Moderna vaccine group had the highest number of hypersensitivity reactions, with 33.33% classified as severe, 25% as moderate, and 41.67% as mild. For the Coronavac vaccine, the majority were classified as moderate (50%), followed by mild (40%) and severe (10%) (
Figure 2).
In the first dose, there were 13 cases of hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, with 12 cases of the Coronavac vaccine and 1 case of the Moderna vaccine. The participants who experienced hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in the first dose (13 individuals) were divided into three groups: continuing vaccination with the same vaccine (8 individuals), switching to a different vaccine (2 individuals), and a group that did not continue vaccination (3 individuals). (
Figure 3).
In the two remaining groups, whether using the same vaccine or a different one, vaccination for the second dose proceeded without conducting a provocation test. One of the 8 people who received the identical vaccination suffered hypersensitive responses, whereas the other seven did not. The first booster dosage was administered without a provocation test, and none of the eight vaccination recipients exhibited hypersensitivity responses after receiving the first booster dose.
In the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination, a total of 10,029 doses were administered. The majority of these doses were the Coronavac vaccine, with 9981 doses (99.52%), and the Moderna vaccine, with 48 doses (0.47%). There were 7 incidences of hypersensitivity responses to the vaccination, all of which were linked to the Coronavac vaccine. One participant declined further immunization, while the remaining 6 people received the COVID-19 booster 1 vaccination using a different vaccine without a provocation test. There were no hypersensitivity events in these 6 people after the first booster dosage (
Figure 4).
Unlike the first and second doses, the third dose, also known as booster 1, experienced a decrease in the number of doses given to the recipients, totaling 8421 doses. The Moderna vaccine was the most administered during this period, with 8338 doses (99.01%), followed by 80 doses of Coronavac (0.95%). Hypersensitivity reactions were found in 23 doses of Moderna during booster 1. This group was divided into three categories: 13 individuals who chose not to continue COVID-19 vaccination, 9 individuals who continued vaccination with a different vaccine, and one individual who continued with the same vaccine.
In the group receiving a different vaccine for the second booster dose, vaccination was conducted without a provocation test, and no hypersensitivity reactions were found after vaccination. Similarly, in the group of healthcare workers receiving the same vaccine for the second booster dose, without a provocation test, no hypersensitivity reactions were observed (
Figure 5).
Hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine led to 17 recipients of the COVID-19 vaccine choosing not to continue with the subsequent vaccine doses.
In this study, a total of 25 patients underwent a provocation test for the COVID-19 vaccine. The characteristics of these patients undergoing the COVID-19 vaccine provocation test shared some similarities with the group of vaccine recipients who experienced hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine but proceeded with the next vaccine doses without undergoing a provocation test (
Table 1).
Among the patients, 17 (68%) had obesity, while 8 (32%) were non-obese. Based on the severity of hypersensitivity reactions, the majority were classified as grade 1, with 10 patients (40%), followed by grade 2 with 7 patients (28%), and grade 3 with 6 patients (24%). The majority of those experiencing hypersensitivity reactions were female, with 17 patients (68%), while males accounted for 8 patients (32%). The age group under 50 years old had the highest number of hypersensitivity reactions, with 16 patients (64%), while the age group over 50 years old had 9 patients (36%). Patients with a history of comorbidities were not significantly different from those without comorbidities, comprising 13 patients (52%) and 12 patients (48%), respectively.
The most frequently used vaccine was Sinovac, administered to 10 patients (40%), followed by Pfizer with 7 patients (28%), Moderna with 6 patients (24%), and AstraZeneca with 2 patients (8%). Comorbidities were present in 7 patients, including asthma in 5 patients (42%) and one case each of pulmonary tuberculosis, dermatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), vasculitis, urticaria, and cardiovascular diseases (8% each). A history of drug hypersensitivity was reported in 8 patients (58%), food hypersensitivity in 2 patients (14%), and both drug and food hypersensitivity in 4 patients (28%). Skin prick tests yielded positive results in 2 patients (8%) and negative results in 23 patients (92%). In the examination of total IgE levels, 12 patients (48%) had total IgE levels below the normal value of 87, while 13 patients (52%) had levels above 87. The success rate of the provocation test reached 92%, with 8% considered unsuccessful.
Among the 25 patients who underwent the vaccine provocation test in this study, 2 patients (8%) experienced hypersensitivity reactions during the test. As a result, the vaccine provocation test procedure was discontinued (deemed unsuccessful) for these 2 patients, while 23 patients (92%) successfully underwent the vaccine provocation test without any hypersensitivity reactions. Patient number 3 experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction with initial symptoms of a widespread red rash, shortness of breath, and decreased consciousness during the Sinovac Skin Prick Test. Epinephrine was injected intramuscularly, and the patient regained consciousness. Vital signs stabilized, the provocation test was stopped, and the patient was observed in the inpatient ward.
4. Discussion
There were 29,036 first, second, and first booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine administered to the vaccination participants at the RSCM from July 2021 to November 2022. In the first dose vaccination, a total of 10,586 doses were given, consisting of 10,552 doses of the Coronavac vaccine and 34 doses of the Moderna vaccine. The second dose was still dominated by the Coronavac vaccine with 9981 doses. However, a shift in the types of vaccines occurred during the first booster dose period, with Moderna being the most frequently administered at 8338 doses, followed by 80 doses of Coronavac and 3 doses of Pfizer. There was a decreasing trend in COVID-19 vaccination coverage at the RSCM, consistent with national data showing a decline in vaccine coverage during each period.
A decrease in COVID-19 vaccine coverage was also observed in Brazil. Initially, the first dose coverage for the COVID-19 vaccine reached 80% for the age group 60–69 years, increasing to 95% for the age group above 70 years. However, during subsequent doses, there was a significant and drastic decrease, with the coverage for COVID-19 vaccination only reaching 26% [
10].
There were several factors that contributed to the decline in COVID-19 vaccine doses, namely safety concerns, vaccine protection levels against the virus, fears and risks of side effects, lack of knowledge about the vaccine, lack of awareness about virus infection, misinformation about the vaccine and the virus, doubts about the efficacy of the vaccine, myths about vaccine side effects from anti-vaccine groups, and government vaccination program policies. Overall, these factors led to a decrease in COVID-19 vaccination coverage [
11]. This study explored hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in RSCM participants, which could be one of the factors contributing to the decline in COVID-19 vaccination.
The study found that 44 vaccinated participants experienced hypersensitivity reactions during the first, second, and first booster doses. The majority were females (79.5%) compared to males (20.5%), consistent with studies in other countries.
The mechanism underlying the greater prevalence of hypersensitivity responses to the COVID-19 vaccination in females remains unknown. One hypothesis is that females have a higher initial immunological response to antigens than men due to regulation of the innate immune system. Generally, females exhibit high expression of IFN I, innate immune response, and T cell-related genes. Differences in immune response related to gender are influenced by genes on the X chromosome and polymorphisms in the ChrY gene regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Additionally, hormonal factors play a role, with varying levels of sex hormones at different stages of life that affect immune cells. It is known that testosterone has a suppressing effect on both innate and adaptive immune responses, suggesting that sex hormones may play a role in increasing vaccine reactogenicity in females [
12].
Genetic factors can also play a role in vaccine reactogenicity through interaction with sex hormones. The ACE2 receptor and Ang-II type 2 gene, both located on the X chromosome, can increase the immune response in females and raise the risk of vaccine-related side effects. Females have a higher risk of diseases related to mast cells, such as anaphylaxis, than males. The study concludes that hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine consistently have higher rates in the female gender, suggesting considerations for different vaccine doses based on gender [
12].
This study found that hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine were more prevalent in the age group below 50 years (84.1%) compared to the age group above 50 years (15.9%). In a study by Beatty et al. in 2021 involving 19,586 patients with hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, the median age of the analyzed age group was 54 years [
13]. Another study by Sainan Bian et al. in 2022 in China divided hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine into two groups: anaphylaxis reactions and non-anaphylaxis reactions. In the anaphylaxis group, the median age was 45 years, and in the non-anaphylaxis group, the median age was 47 years [
14].
The severity of hypersensitivity reactions varied, ranging from mild to severe. This study classified the severity into three groups based on systemic symptoms involving the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. The results revealed that the group with mild severity was the largest, comprising 18 vaccine recipients (41%), followed by the group with moderate severity, comprising 16 participants (36%), and the group with severe severity, comprising 10 participants (23%) [
15].
This result disagrees with the findings of Trine et al. in Denmark 2021. The team evaluated individuals with a history of hypersensitivity responses to the COVID-19 vaccine and discovered that further vaccinations could be undertaken safely following diagnostic testing. Trine et al. reported 55 patients with hypersensitivity reactions who underwent a skin prick test (SPT), 52 of which were able to receive the next vaccine dose without experiencing hypersensitivity reactions. However, three patients tested positive, with one being allergic to Polyethylene Glycol and the others to 1,2-Dimyristoyl-rac-glycero-3-methoxypolyethylene glycol-2000. Subsequently, all three patients successfully received the next vaccine dose. Trine et al. concluded that with adequate diagnostic testing, patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine can safely undergo subsequent vaccination without experiencing rapid hypersensitivity reactions [
16]. In 2021, Benerji et al. provided recommendations for approaching patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine. If there is a history of anaphylaxis suspected to be caused by allergens such as Polysorbate 80, Polyethylene Glycol injection, vaccines containing Polyethylene Glycol, or oral Polyethylene Glycol, the next vaccine dose can be administered directly with extended post-vaccination observation. However, for patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to Polyethylene Glycol and Polysorbate 80, it is recommended to conduct a skin prick test before vaccination [
17].
In the group of patients who underwent the COVID-19 vaccine provocation test, examinations of immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were also conducted. Sixty percent of patients had IgE levels above the reference value (>87), while 40% of patients had normal immunoglobulin levels. A study conducted by Mariko et al. in 2022 also examined IgE levels with more specific IgE levels, which is IgE from Polyethylene Glycol in patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine. The discussion revealed the role of vaccine excipients, especially Polyethylene Glycol, in causing hypersensitivity reactions, particularly in mRNA vaccines. Although several studies have explored this topic, the mechanisms of hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine are not fully understood [
18].
This research is the first research on hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in Indonesia, which provides an overview of the incidence, severity, and outcome of hypersensitivity reactions. This research also carried out a COVID-19 vaccine provocation test, which is an action that has not been widely performed in allergy immunology health service centers in Indonesia. In this study, the total number of doses administered was quite large, namely 29,061, divided into doses 1, 2, and booster 1. However, the distribution of vaccine types varied, with some types administered in quite large numbers. In contrast, other types of vaccine were very few. Consequently, for certain COVID-19 vaccines, the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions cannot be assessed due to the small number of doses administered.