Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Soundwaves on Foamability Properties and Sensory of Beers with a Machine Learning Modeling Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Biochemical and Physiological Parameters in Rats Fed with High-Fat Diet: The Protective Effect of Chronic Treatment with Purple Grape Juice (Bordo Variety)
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Dry and Wet Milling of Barley Malt and Its Influence on Granulometry and Wort Composition
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Development of a Menthol Solution for Use during Sport and Exercise
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Beverages
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/beverages4030052
beverages-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Addition on the Antioxidant Activity of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Juices

by
Cecilia Bender
1,*,†,
Karina V. Killermann
2,†,
Dirk Rehmann
2 and
Helmut H. Weidlich
1
1
Institut Kurz GmbH, Stöckheimer Weg 1, 50829 Cologne, Germany
2
Institute for Food Technology, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Am Staudengarten 11, 85354 Freising, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Beverages 2018, 4(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030052
Submission received: 12 June 2018 / Revised: 19 July 2018 / Accepted: 20 July 2018 / Published: 25 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Beverages, from Idea to Functionality)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The demand for antioxidant-rich beverages is steadily expanding. At the same time, the possibility of manufacturing products with reduced sugar content, sweetened with natural ingredients, represents a decisive aspect of obtaining quality products with health benefits. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (stevia) is a natural sweetener that can help to control caloric intake and is also a good source of antioxidant compounds. The present study was designed to assess the feasibility of producing high-quality berry juices sweetened with dry-grinded stevia leaves or their crude extract. The effect of the stevia supplementation on the antioxidant activities of raspberry juices was determined at two different production steps by means of the Folin–Ciocalteu, the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and the cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assays. The addition of stevia significantly increased the antioxidant activity of the juices and resulted in significantly higher ascorbic acid and total phenolic content. A positive correlation was observed between ORAC, CAA, and total phenolic values. These findings show that supplementation with stevia not only promotes a healthy diet by reducing sugar intake but may also enhance the antioxidant potential of the beverage.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rubus species are an excellent source of dietary phytochemicals and comprise berries with a high content of polyphenols. In particular, red raspberry (Rubus ideaus) has a high content of phenolic acids and flavonoids, with mean contents as high as 113 mg/100 g and 88 mg/100 g, respectively [1]. Phenolic compounds and vitamin C have been implicated in the antioxidant capacity of fruits and derived beverages [2]. The phenolic compounds from Rubus sp. contribute to the total antioxidant capacity of the raspberry [3,4].
Polyphenols are considered to play a protective role in several chronic diseases associated with oxidative stress. Studies suggest that diets rich in plant polyphenols offer some protection against the development of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, and neurodegenerative diseases [5]. This embodies one of the main reasons for consumers’ growing interest in antioxidant-rich products, alongside an interest in products with reduced sugar content and of natural origin.
Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni is a perennial herb native to South America, where it has been used for centuries to sweeten food and beverages. Stevia leaves are several times sweeter than table sugar but have no calories [6,7,8]; steviol glycosides are sweet secondary metabolites that mainly occur in the leaves. Besides its sweetening properties, stevia is a good source of carbohydrates, fiber, proteins, and essential amino acids [9,10] and contains antioxidant compounds with diverse biochemical roles, including ascorbic acid [11], phenolic compounds [12,13,14,15,16], and flavonoids [17,18,19]. Nowadays, stevia’s crude extracts, as well as its steviol glycosides, are used to sweeten foods and beverages. Moreover, with a recent update of the European Commission’s Novel-Food Catalogue, now recognizing Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a traditional food when prepared with or contained in fruits, tea, or herbal infusions [20], stevia has been of growing importance to the European Union (EU) beverage market.
Previous work with the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay has shown that crude water extracts from stevia leaves exhibit promising antioxidant activity, superior to that of the stem’s extract, ranging from about 960 to 1070 μmol Trolox equivalents per gram of dried leaves [19]. Moreover, the crude extracts from stevia exhibit a high antioxidant potential when compared to its purified sweet metabolites [19].
Recently, the outcome of the addition of stevia to high-pressure processed fruits was reported [21]. The authors showed that the addition of up to 2.5% w/v of stevia extract increases the total phenolic content and ORAC values, inhibits the absorption of ABTS, and contributes to the inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase, two key enzymes involved in the oxidation of phenolic compounds, while also reducing the microbial load of the processed fruits. More recently, a study from our group showed that the heat treatment of berries-mash at 85 °C, followed by an enzymatic treatment and by heating treatments, positively affects the phenolic yield of the berry juices and leads to an increase in the antioxidant capacity [22]. Therefore, we employed the knowledge acquired on this issue to produce natural raspberry juices, without the use of preservatives, artificial colors, or synthetic substances and sweetened with a natural source. The goal of the investigation has been to rate the effect of the addition, at two different production steps, of dry-grinded stevia leaves or their crude extract on the antioxidant potential of raspberry juices. Regarding the antioxidant potential, the study was conducted purely chemically (e.g., ORAC, total phenolics), as well as by a cell-based assay (CAA). The latter approach shows great progress over the merely chemical methods, as it takes account of the biological system’s complexity [23]. The CAA assay has been widely used so far to assess the antioxidant potential of foods; however, to the best of our knowledge, there is no literature describing a similar approach to studying the effect of the addition of stevia on the antioxidant potential of fruit juices.

2. Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Frozen raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) were obtained from Mainfrucht GmbH & Co. KG (Gochsheim, Germany) and stored at −20 °C until use.
Dried powders from S. rebaudiana leaves were obtained from Organic Stevia GmbH (Hannover, Germany). Extracts were prepared fresh by infusing stevia powder via stirring for 10 min in 100 °C distilled water at a final concentration of 100 g/L. The extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000× g, and then, 100 mL of the resulting supernatant were immediately added to 900 mL of raspberry juice.

2.2. Juice Production

Raspberry juices were produced from 2 kg packages belonging to the same lot. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the red raspberry juice production. Fruit packages were defrosted by blanching with boiling distilled water for 2 min and then mashed by crushing with a blender for 1 min. To favor the phenolic yield and the antioxidant properties, the juices were produced as previously described [22]. Briefly, the mash was heated to 85 °C in an airtight bag, held for 25 min at 85 °C, cooled open to 50 °C, and incubated at 50 °C with Pectinex® Ultra Color (Novozymes, Bagsværd, Denmark) enzyme preparation for 60 min (dosage recommended by the manufacturer) before juice pressing.
At different production steps, each juice was sweetened to a final concentration of 10 g stevia/L. R-EH and R-PEH were sweetened immediately before the heat treatment with stevia crude extract or stevia leaves powder, respectively. R-PAST was sweetened with stevia crude extract immediately before pasteurization, and R-Std represented the unsweetened raspberry juice.
The juices were extracted using nylon filter bags and a stainless-steel Para-Press (Arauner, Kitzingen, Germany), in which the pressure was gradually raised to 5.6 bars. The pressed juices were put into 110 mL bottles, pasteurized by heating to 85 °C for a few seconds in a water bath, and then allowed to cool at room temperature. Two independent production batches from the same raspberry lot were bottled in duplicate. The juices were stored at room temperature in the dark for up to 4 weeks before analysis.

2.3. Characteristic Properties of Raspberry Juices

The yield was determined by weighing and is given as percentage.
The ascorbic acid was determined in triplicate using the Reflectoquant system RQflex 10 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and the results are expressed as mg of ascorbic acid/L ± RSD %.
The total acid measurement was done in duplicate by potentiometric titration with 0.33 M NaOH (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to the titration endpoint of pH 7.0, calculated as acidity of wine and expressed as g/L. The pH was measured using a pH meter EcoScan (EUTECH Instruments, Nijkerk, The Netherlands). The total soluble solids (°brix) content was measured at 20 °C using a refractometer HANNA HI 96801 (Hanna Instruments, Vöhringen, Germany).
The viscosity was measured at 20 °C in duplicate with a MarsIII rheometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Karlsruhe, Germany). A concentric cylinder geometry was employed and rotational test was performed under variation of the shear rate between 0.5–500 s−1. The viscosity was evaluated by Newtonian fit of the shear rate range 1–100 s−1 and expressed as mPa s.

2.4. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The total phenolics were determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method according to Singleton and Rossi [24]. The total phenols are expressed as the mean of three experiments ± RSD % and as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/L of juice.

2.5. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) Assay

The ROS scavenging capacities of the raspberry juices were determined by means of the ORAC test, according to Prior et al. [25] with minor modifications. The juice samples were centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min; the supernatants were filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. Serial dilutions were immediately prepared in a phosphate buffer (75 mM, pH 7.4) and analyzed in duplicate wells. The raw data were analyzed with MARS 2.0 Optima data analysis software (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). The integrated area under the fluorescence curve (AUC) was calculated for each sample and corrected with the AUC of a blank sample. Trolox equivalents (TE) were calculated based on the reference AUCs, and the ORAC values were expressed as the mean of two batches ± RSD % and as µmol TE/L of juice.

2.6. Cell Culture

HepG2 cells (Biobanking of veterinary resources-IZSLER, Brescia, Italy) were grown in DMEM high glucose medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM of L-Glutamine, 50 μg/mL of Penicillin, and 50 μg/mL of Streptomycin. The cells were maintained at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

2.7. Cellular Antioxidant Activity (CAA) Assay

For each experiment, the cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. The CAA assay was conducted according to Wolfe and Liu [23] with minor modifications. The HepG2 leaver cells were seeded in a black 96-well plate with transparent bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) and incubated until confluence at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The juice samples were centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min, and the resulting supernatants were filtered through 0.2 µm syringe filters. Subsequently, 200 µL of each filtrate were diluted in 800 µL of DMEM high glucose medium. The diluted samples were immediately tested in four replicate wells. The raw data were analyzed with MARS 2.0 Optima software (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). The AUC was calculated for each sample and corrected with the AUC of a blank sample. Quercetin equivalents (QE) were calculated based on the reference standard curves, and the CAA values were expressed as the mean ± RSD % of two independent production batches and as μmol QE/L of juice.

2.8. Statistics

The data are presented as the mean ± relative standard deviation (RSD %) of two independent production batches and compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey’s test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Pearson’s test was used to assess the linearities of the calibration curves and the correlation among different parameters. The statistical analysis was performed with the aid of PAST 3.2 software [26].

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the characteristic properties of the raspberry juices. The values represent an average of the two batches manufactured independently on a semi-industrial scale. The obtained pH, between 3.07 and 3.12, showed relatively acidic but typical values for fruit juices without significant differences between the samples. The juice yield was not significantly different between the samples, ranging from 81.2 to 82.5%. The viscosity was also constant between the samples, showing typical values for juices between 2.332 and 2.476 mPa s. The obtained extract contents between 8.99 and 9.77 °brix also did not differ significantly.
Under the tested conditions, the addition of 10% stevia crude extract before mash heating or juice pasteurization and the addition of 1% stevia leaf powder before mash heating had no impact on the characteristic properties of the yield, pH, °brix, or viscosity compared with the control. Similarly, it was recently reported that pH and °brix are not significantly affected in Chayote (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.) juices when mixed with dried and milled leaves of stevia (0.7–0.8% w/v) [27]. The unsweetened raspberry juice (R-Std) showed 19.38 g/L of total acids. The addition of 10 g/L of stevia significantly lowered the total acid value in the raspberry juices to between 17.50 and 18.20 g/L. No significant differences were recorded between the different sweetened samples.
The ascorbic acid content of R-Std was 437 ± 26 mg/L. This value was higher in all the tested juices with stevia additions, precisely 505 ± 29 mg/L (R-PEH), 515 ± 15 mg/L (R-PAST), and 523 ± 12 mg/L (R-EH), all with the same level of significance. Therefore, the addition of 10 g/L of stevia as crude extract before mash heating or juice pasteurization or as leaves powder increases the ascorbic acid content. In this regard, Zablur et al. found that black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) juices sweetened with stevia dry-grinded leaves contain up to twice the vitamin C of chokeberry juices with added sucrose [28]. Such an increment seems higher than that in our results with raspberry juices; however, the data for the unsweetened chokeberry juice were not reported, and thus, the effective increment through the addition of stevia cannot be figured for that berry juice.
The effect of the stevia addition on the antioxidant activity of the processed raspberry juices was evaluated in vitro. As shown in Figure 2a, the addition of 1% w/v stevia increased the total phenolic content of the raspberry juices. The highest content was found in the raspberry juice sweetened with stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization (R-PAST), being 2325 mg GAE/L ± 54, which is the mean of the two production days. Overall, higher phenolic content was observed when supplementing with the crude water extract (R-EH and R-PAST) than with the stevia powder (R-PEH). Similar results have previously been reported with the addition of stevia in juice [29] or processed fruit pulp [21] containing papaya, mango, and orange, as well as in chayote juice [27]. These studies report that the addition of stevia extracts significantly increased the total phenolic content of the fruit-based preparations. In our study, the addition of stevia (grinded leaves or crude extract) increased the total phenolic content of the raspberry juices by between 27.8% and 48.3%.
The ability of the raspberry juices to scavenge peroxyl radicals was evaluated. As illustrated in Figure 2b, all the raspberry juices have a remarkable antioxidant capacity assessed by the ORAC test. The R-Std reference sample showed intermediate to high corrected values with an average of 17,027 ± 1470 µmol TE/L. The ORAC value of the juice was significantly enhanced (p < 0.0001) with the addition of stevia. The strongest ORAC was reached with the raspberry juice sweetened with stevia crude extract immediately before pasteurization (R-PAST), being 34,433 ± 839 µmol TE/L, and followed by the R-PEH and R-EH samples (31,818 ± 765 and 28,679 ± 918 µmol TE/L, respectively). In all preparations, it was found that the addition of stevia at a final concentration of 10 g/L (4597 ± 133 µmol TE/L) increased the antioxidant capacity compared with the unsweetened juice by at least 68.4%. Elsewhere it has been reported that the addition of stevia positively influences the ORAC values of high-pressure processed fruit-mixture containing papaya, mango, and orange pulps [21].
The intracellular antioxidant capacity of the raspberry juices was determined through CAA assay. This method measures the inhibition of intracellular ROS, imitating the reaction between antioxidants and lipids. In addition, it considers some key cellular features (e.g., cellular uptake, metabolism, and distribution) that are not taken into account with other in vitro tests. As shown in Figure 2c, all the raspberry juices are absorbed within the HepG2 leaver cells, and an intracellular antioxidant potential was recorded. The CAA values ranged from 900 ± 24 μmol QE/L to 1305 ± 129 μmol QE/L for the raspberry juices sweetened with stevia, being lower in the unsweetened R-Std sample (794 ± 57 μmol QE/L). This increment is significantly higher (p < 0.0001) with the addition of stevia crude extract, but not with the leaf powder. Of note is that the stevia crude extract itself showed a CAA value of 136 ± 16, roughly 17% of that of the reference sample R-Std, but its addition to the raspberry juices increased the CAA values to up to 64%. Analogous to the results here obtained by ORAC, such reduced oxidation effect is likely to be explained by a synergistic mechanism involving the multiple components present in the juice samples.
Overall it was found that the addition of stevia at a final concentration of 10 g/L increases the antioxidant capacity of the raspberry juices in the tested industrial processes compared with the unsweetened juice, as shown by the total phenolics, ORAC, and CAA values. Under the described experimental conditions, the ORAC, CAA, and total phenolics values are positively correlated, as per a regression analysis (Table 2).

4. Conclusions

The improvement of processing methods to obtain antioxidant-rich juices and beverages is of ever increasing interest. Most existing literature on the use of stevia is based on data regarding purified steviol glycosides, while few studies address the use of stevia leaves as an ingredient, and even fewer studies point out stevia’s antioxidant potential in foods. This study describes the effect on the antioxidant potential of raspberry juices as a result of the addition of stevia extracts or leaf powder at different production steps. It was shown that the addition of 10 g/L of stevia (relative to the final volume) to raspberry juice does not significantly influence the yield, pH value, total soluble solids, or the viscosity. In contrast, the addition can increase parameters that are associated with antioxidant potential, such as ascorbic acid, total phenolic content, ORAC and CAA values. As far as we know, this is the first report considering a cellular model to measure the antioxidant potential of a stevia-containing food. In view of the results presented here, it can be concluded that the addition of Stevia rebaudiana crude extract or its grinded leaves enhance the global antioxidant potential of raspberry juices.
Overall, stevia crude extracts show good potential to be employed as a natural ingredient for the food industry, capable of sweetening and increasing the antioxidant quality of fruit beverages, while also serving as a food preservative and adding nutritional value.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, and Writing: C.B. and K.V.K.; Conceptualization, Resources, Project Administration and Supervision, D.R. and H.H.W.

Funding

This research was funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany, under the Central Innovation Programme for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (ZIM) through grants 16KN038022 and 16KN038023.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Kenneth Walsh for language editing and Manuela Melcher for the assistance with the Folin–Ciocalteu analysis. The donation of enzyme preparations by Novozymes (Denmark) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rothwell, J.A.; Perez-Jimenez, J.; Neveu, V.; Medina-Remon, A.; M’Hiri, N.; García-Lobato, P.; Manach, C.; Knox, C.; Eisner, R.; Wishart, D.S.; et al. Phenol-Explorer 3.0: A major update of the Phenol-Explorer database to incorporate data on the effects of food processing on polyphenol content. Database 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Prior, R.L.; Cao, G.; Martin, A.; Sofic, E.; McEwen, J.; O’Brien, C.; Lischner, N.; Ehlenfeldt, M.; Kalt, W.; Krewer, G.; et al. Antioxidant capacity as influenced by total phenolic and anthocyanin content, maturity, and variety of Vaccinium Species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moyer, R.A.; Hummer, K.E.; Finn, C.E.; Frei, B.; Wrolstad, R.E. Anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant capacity in diverse small fruits: Vaccinium, Rubus and Ribes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wada, L.; Boxin, O. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Oregon caneberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3495–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goyal, S.K.; Samsher, G.R.K. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Madan, S.; Ahmad, S.; Singh, G.N.; Kohli, K.; Kumar, Y.; Singh, R.; Garg, M. Stevia rebaudiana (Bert) Bertoni: A review. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2010, 1, 267–286. [Google Scholar]
  8. Thomas, J.E.; Glade, M.J. Stevia: It’s not just about calories. Open Obes. J. 2010, 2, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lemus-Mondaca, R.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Zura-Bravo, L.; Ah-Hen, K. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, source of a high-potency natural sweetener: A comprehensive review on the biochemical, nutritional and functional aspects. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wölwer-Rieck, U. The leaves of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni), their constituents and the analyses thereof: A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, I.S.; Yang, M.; Lee, O.H.; Kang, S.N. The antioxidant activity and the bioactive compound content of Stevia rebaudiana water extracts. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1328–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rajbhandari, A.; Roberts, M.F. The Flavonoids of Stevia rebaudiana. J. Nat. Prod. 1983, 46, 194–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tadhani, M.B.; Patel, V.H.; Subhash, R. In vitro antioxidant activities of Stevia rebaudiana leaves and callus. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shukla, S.; Mehta, A.; Bajpai, V.K.; Shukla, S. In vitro antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic leaf extract of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2338–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abou-Arab, E.A.; Abu-Salem, F.M. Evaluation of bioactive compounds of Stevia rebaudiana leaves and callus. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2010, 4, 627–634. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jahan, I.A.; Mostafa, M.; Hossain, H.; Nimmi, I.; Sattar, A.; Alim, A.; Moeiz, S.M. Antioxidant activity of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves from Bangladesh. Bangladesh Pharm. J. 2010, 13, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  17. Karaköse, H.; Jaiswal, R.; Kuhnert, N. Characterization and quantification of hydroxycinnamate derivatives in Stevia rebaudiana leaves by LC-MSn. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10143–10150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Karaköse, H.; Müller, A.; Kuhnert, N. Profiling and quantification of phenolics in Stevia rebaudiana leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9188–9198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bender, C.; Graziano, S.; Zimmermann, B.F. Study of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni antioxidant activities and cellular properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. European Commssion. Novel Food Catalogue. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/novel_food/catalogue/search/public/index.cfm (accessed on 19 June 2017).
  21. Barba, F.J.; Criado, M.N.; Belda-Galbis, C.M.; Esteve, M.J.; Rodrigo, D. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni as a natural antioxidant/antimicrobial for high pressure processed fruit extract: Processing parameter optimization. Food Chem. 2014, 148, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bender, C.; Killermann, K.V.; Rehmann, D.; Weidlich, H.H. Effect of mash enzyme and heat treatments on the cellular antioxidant activity of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum), raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) juices. CyTA J. Food 2017, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wolfe, K.L.; Liu, R.H. Cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay for assessing antioxidants, foods, and dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  25. Prior, R.L.; Wu, X.; Schaich, K. Standardized Methods for the Determination of Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolics in Foods and Dietary Supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Riviello-Flores, M.D.; Arévalo-Galarza, M.D.; Cadena-Iñiguez, J.; Soto-Hernández, R.M.; Ruiz-Posadas, L.D.; Gómez-Merino, F.C. Nutraceutic Characteristics of the Extracts and Juice of Chayote (Sechiumedule (Jacq.) Sw.) Fruits. Beverages 2018, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Šic Žlabur, J.; Dobričević, N.; Galić, A.; Pliestić, S.; Voća, S. The influence of natural sweetener (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) on bioactive compounds content in chokeberry juice. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carbonell-Capella, J.M.; Barba, F.J.; Esteve, M.J.; Frígola, A. High pressure processing of fruit juice mixture sweetened with Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Optimal retention of physical and nutritional quality. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2013, 18, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Beverages 04 00052 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram to produce raspberry juice. Green colored boxes indicate the various stevia addition points leading to different sweetened juices (namely R-EH (supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment), R-PEH (supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment), and R-PAST (supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization)).
Figure 1. Flow diagram to produce raspberry juice. Green colored boxes indicate the various stevia addition points leading to different sweetened juices (namely R-EH (supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment), R-PEH (supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment), and R-PAST (supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization)).
Beverages 04 00052 g001
Beverages 04 00052 g002 550
Figure 2. Antioxidant activity of the raspberry juices: (a) Folin–Ciocalteu; (b) oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC); (c) cellular antioxidant activity (CAA). Stevia 10 g/L: stevia crude water extract. * p <0.0001 vs R-Std group. The data are represented as box plots, showing median, 25–75% quartiles, and total range of values of duplicates from two batches (n ≥ 6). R-Std, blank juice without stevia addition, values are corrected with water 10% v/v. R-EH, juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment. R-PAST, juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization. R-PEH (juice supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment) values are corrected with water 9% v/v.
Figure 2. Antioxidant activity of the raspberry juices: (a) Folin–Ciocalteu; (b) oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC); (c) cellular antioxidant activity (CAA). Stevia 10 g/L: stevia crude water extract. * p <0.0001 vs R-Std group. The data are represented as box plots, showing median, 25–75% quartiles, and total range of values of duplicates from two batches (n ≥ 6). R-Std, blank juice without stevia addition, values are corrected with water 10% v/v. R-EH, juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment. R-PAST, juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization. R-PEH (juice supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment) values are corrected with water 9% v/v.
Beverages 04 00052 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristic properties of red raspberry juices with different additions of stevia. Mean ± RSD %. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). R-Std: blank juice without stevia addition; R-EH: juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment; R-PAST: juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization; R-PEH: juice supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment.
Table 1. Characteristic properties of red raspberry juices with different additions of stevia. Mean ± RSD %. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). R-Std: blank juice without stevia addition; R-EH: juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before heat treatment; R-PAST: juice supplemented with 10% v/v of stevia crude water extract immediately before pasteurization; R-PEH: juice supplemented with 1% w/v of stevia dried leaf powder immediately before heat treatment.
SampleYieldAscorbic AcidTotal AcidpHExtractViscosity
(%)RSD%(mg/L)RSD%(g/L)RSD%(–)RSD%(°brix)RSD%(mPa s)RSD%
R-Std81.34a1.47437a5.9119.38b0.493.08a0.009.34a0.982.476a6.67
R-EH82.54a0.34523b2.3117.50a0.593.07a0.928.99a1.812.338a0.53
R-PAST81.34a1.47515b2.9417.75a0.733.12a0.239.05a2.342.332a0.23
R-PEH81.15a0.32505b5.7018.20a0.523.09a0.469.77a9.632.393a1.25
Table
Table 2. Correlation analysis among antioxidant activity parameters measured in raspberry juices and stevia crude extract. * indicates significance at p < 0.005 according to t-test.
Table 2. Correlation analysis among antioxidant activity parameters measured in raspberry juices and stevia crude extract. * indicates significance at p < 0.005 according to t-test.
ORACCAA
ORAC0.921 *
TPC0.978 *0.981 *

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bender, C.; Killermann, K.V.; Rehmann, D.; Weidlich, H.H. Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Addition on the Antioxidant Activity of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Juices. Beverages 2018, 4, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030052

AMA Style

Bender C, Killermann KV, Rehmann D, Weidlich HH. Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Addition on the Antioxidant Activity of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Juices. Beverages. 2018; 4(3):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bender, Cecilia, Karina V. Killermann, Dirk Rehmann, and Helmut H. Weidlich. 2018. "Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Addition on the Antioxidant Activity of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Juices" Beverages 4, no. 3: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030052

APA Style

Bender, C., Killermann, K. V., Rehmann, D., & Weidlich, H. H. (2018). Effect of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Addition on the Antioxidant Activity of Red Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Juices. Beverages, 4(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop