Next Article in Journal
Update of Dietary Supplement Label Database Addressing on Coding in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Employing Source Code Quality Analytics for Enriching Code Snippets Data
 
 
Data Descriptor
Peer-Review Record

Thailand Raw Water Quality Dataset Analysis and Evaluation

by Jaturapith Krohkaew 1, Pongpon Nilaphruek 1,*, Niti Witthayawiroj 2, Sakchai Uapipatanakul 3, Yamin Thwe 4 and Padma Nyoman Crisnapati 5
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 23 July 2023 / Revised: 18 August 2023 / Accepted: 1 September 2023 / Published: 4 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Information Systems and Data Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The aim of this study was to describe a reconstructed daily water quality dataset that complements rare historical observations for six station points along the Chao Phraya River in Thailand using Internet of Things technology. The abstract does not show in detail the methodology used, i.e., how data analysis was carried out. Moreover, I suggest including numerical values in the abstract.

I suggest linking lines 75 and 76. One paragraph ends and the other begins without connection.

Lines 100 to 104: “The sensor measurements encompass parameters such as Turbidity (TURB_NTU), Optical Dissolved Oxygen (HDO), Dissolved Oxygen Saturation (DO_SAT), Spatial Conductivity (SPCOND), Acidity/Basicity (pH), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Salinity (SALINITY), Temperature (TEMP), Chlorophyll (CHL), and Depth (DEPTH).”

I suggest including the test method used (ASTM, ISO, Standard Methods, etc…)

Figures 1 and 2: Please, improve the quality of these figures.

Lines 150 and 151: “… which demonstrates a close correlation. Additionally, spcond exhibits a close relationship with both tds and salinity, indicating their interdependence.”

Please define “a close correlation” and “a close relationship”.

What were the % data set in the validation/calibration step and test step?

The authors used mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) as performance metrics. These metrics are perfect since the data behaviour is Gaussian. Please, comment in the manuscript about this assumption. On the other hand, I suggest including a reference about the cases in which the data behaviour departs from the normality, such as: Risk Assessment in Monitoring of Water Analysis of a Brazilian River. Molecules 2022, 27, 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113628

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The Thailand Raw Water Quality Dataset describes a reconstructed daily water quality dataset that complements rare historical observations along six stations along the Chao Phraya River in Thailand. The data are original and well-defined, and the data collection methods are described in sufficient detail to be easily reproduced.

This paper employs Internet of Things (IoT) technology to collect data, the data set is technically sound. The data is in CSV format and can be easily reused by others. 

The paper does not describe how to ensure the accuracy of the raw data collected, nor does it propose corresponding quality control measures. And the paper does not describe the later expansion of the dataset, for example, how to add more parameters to this dataset if they can be collected later.

The Thailand Raw Water Quality Dataset describes a reconstructed daily water quality dataset that complements rare historical observations along six stations along the Chao Phraya River in Thailand. The data are original and well-defined, and the data collection methods are described in sufficient detail to be easily reproduced.

This paper employs Internet of Things (IoT) technology to collect data, the data set is technically sound. The data is in CSV format and can be easily reused by others. 

The paper does not describe how to ensure the accuracy of the raw data collected, nor does it propose corresponding quality control measures. And the paper does not describe the later expansion of the dataset, for example, how to add more parameters to this dataset if they can be collected later.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all of my comments.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your support and valuable comments.

Back to TopTop