Next Article in Journal
Chitosan/Calcium-Coated Ginsenoside Rb1 Phosphate Flower-like Microparticles as an Adjuvant to Enhance Immune Responses
Next Article in Special Issue
Genotype, but Not Climate, Affects the Resistance of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) to Viral Infections and to the Mite Varroa destructor
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Housing and Management Factors on Selected Indicators of the Welfare Quality® Protocol in Loose-Housed Dairy Cows
Previous Article in Special Issue
Colonisation Patterns of Nosema ceranae in the Azores Archipelago
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Two Diagnostic Techniques for the Apis mellifera Varroatosis: Strengths, Weaknesses and Impact on the Honeybee Health

Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(7), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070354
by Roberto Bava 1,2,†, Fabio Castagna 1,2,†, Cristina Carresi 1,3,*, Antonio Cardamone 1, Giovanni Federico 4, Paola Roncada 1,2, Ernesto Palma 1,3,5,*, Vincenzo Musella 1,2,‡ and Domenico Britti 1,2,‡
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(7), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9070354
Submission received: 18 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 11 July 2022 / Published: 13 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Advances in Bee Health and Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Varroa destructor is the most dangerous pest that poses a threat to the honey bee survival. This study investigates the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of two field techniques for diagnosing Varroa destructor infestation in hives. The results showed that the CO2 method proved less reliable for quantifying Varroa parasites on adult bees. The sugar roll test provided a reliable value for the number of mites contained in the samples confirming its highest safety, efficacy and greatly improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of Varroa infestation. Here I suggest some minor revisions of the text.

1. Authors should carefully check the writing of the manuscript.

2. Line 32, "The results demonstrated..." with an extra space before it

3. line 54, "the reproductive phase begins...", with an extra space.

4. line 342, "injection can be collected..." one more space

5. The resolution of the figures is low, and the figures with high resolution should be provided.

6. In Figure 3, it is better to name each part of the figure, for example figure 6, and explain each one.

7. Figure 6, it is better to explain each figure, including Fig.6A, Fig.6B, Fig.6C and Fig.6D in the figure legend.

8. Figure 3, the number of Varroa parasites is not large. Does it affect the accuracy of the results?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This study compares the effectivness of two commercially available diagnostic methods for measuring levels of Varroa destructor infestations. In general, the probem of varroa mite is widespread and thus there is a need of effective diagnostic methods that can help with correct application of treatments and can also help to prevent unctorolled use of drugs and development of drug resistance. Therefore, this study might be of interest for the wide audience. However, there are a few major and a few minor issues that have to be fixed first. Please see line by line comments. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop