Next Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Inclusion of Spirulina platensis on the Reproductive Performance of Female Mink
Next Article in Special Issue
First Case of a Cerebrocortical Ganglioglioma in a Dog
Previous Article in Journal
Longitudinal Testing of Leptospira Antibodies in Horses Located near a Leptospirosis Outbreak in Alpacas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Features, Tumour Localisation, and Survival of Dogs with Presumptive Brain Gliomas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/vetsci9080427
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survival Time after Surgical Debulking and Temozolomide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Canine Intracranial Gliomas

by
Emma Hidalgo Crespo
1,
Alba Farré Mariné
1,
Martí Pumarola i Battle
2,
Juan Francisco Borrego Massó
1 and
Alejandro Luján Feliu-Pascual
1,*
1
AÚNA Especialidades Veterinarias, Calle Algepser 22-1, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain
2
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Faculty, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(8), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080427
Submission received: 29 May 2022 / Revised: 3 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Canine Nervous System Tumors—Honorary Special Issue Commemorating the Work of Veterinary Neuropathologist Prof. Robert J. Higgins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Infiltrative brain tumours are common in dogs. Although different treatments have been used, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combinations, guidelines for the most effective management are lacking. In this study, we report the effect of combining surgery and chemotherapy on the survival of 14 dogs with infiltrative gliomas. Four dogs were operated on two or three times to remove the tumors, and only one of these dogs died shortly after the second surgery. All tolerated the surgery with minimal or no deterioration, and all were euthanized between 6 months to 2 years after diagnosis due to tumour progression. To conclude, surgery and chemotherapy, although not curative, can prolong survival in dogs with infiltrative brain tumours. This information may help future research into the most appropriate treatment for this debilitating condition.

Abstract

Intracranial gliomas are associated with a poor prognosis, and the most appropriate treatment is yet to be defined. The objectives of this retrospective study are to report the time to progression and survival times of a group of dogs with histologically confirmed intracranial gliomas treated with surgical debulking and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. All cases treated in a single referral veterinary hospital from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria comprised a histopathological diagnosis of intracranial glioma, adjunctive chemotherapy, and follow-up until death. Cases were excluded if the owner declined chemotherapy or there was insufficient follow-up information in the clinical records. Fourteen client-owned dogs were included with a median time to progression (MTP) of 156 days (95% CI 133–320 days) and median survival time (MST) of 240 days (95% CI 149–465 days). Temozolomide was the first-line adjuvant chemotherapy but changed to another chemotherapy agent (lomustine, toceranib phosphate, or melphalan) when tumour relapse was either suspected by clinical signs or confirmed by advanced imaging. Of the fourteen dogs, three underwent two surgical resections and one, three surgeries. Survival times (ST) were 241, 428, and 468 days for three dogs treated twice surgically and 780 days for the dog treated surgically three times. Survival times for dogs operated once was 181 days. One case was euthanized after developing aspiration pneumonia, and all other cases after progression of clinical signs due to suspected or confirmed tumour relapse. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are well-tolerated options in dogs with intracranial gliomas in which surgery is a possibility and should be considered a potential treatment option. Repeated surgery may be considered for selected cases.

1. Introduction

Intracranial neoplasms are common in dogs [1] and represent the major neurological cause of mortality and morbidity in companion animals [2,3]. The incidence of intracranial neoplasia in dogs based on necropsy data has been reported to be 2–4.5% [1,4], while the prevalence of primary intracranial tumours in dogs is 2.3% [1]. Breeds like Boxer, Boston Terrier, Golden retriever, French bulldog, and Rat terrier showed a higher incidence of primary intracranial neoplasms [1]. In contrast, Cocker spaniel or Doberman pinscher showed a significantly lower risk of primary intracranial neoplasms [1]. Astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are highly overrepresented in specific brachycephalic breeds (Boxers, Boston terriers, and Bulldogs) [1,3,4,5,6,7,8], with over 50% of all canine gliomas occurring in dogs with this head conformation [1,2,5,6].
The distribution of intracranial neoplasia in dogs is divided into 50% primary tumours and 50% secondary tumours [1]. Meningiomas represent around 50% of primary intracranial neoplasia in dogs, gliomas 36%, and choroid plexus tumours are the third most common [1,3,4,5,9,10]. Secondary intracranial tumours, in order of frequency, are hemangiosarcoma, pituitary tumours, lymphoma, metastatic carcinoma, an extension of nasal neoplasms, and histiocytic sarcoma [11].
Intracranial neoplasms are more frequently seen in adult dogs over 5 years of age [1,8,10,11,12], with gliomas diagnosed at a median age of 8 years [1,2,3,4,5,10], which are predominantly located in the olfactory bulb, temporal and parietal lobes [1,2,5].
A presumptive diagnosis of an intracranial tumour is established based on history, clinical signs, and advanced imaging [2,9,13,14,15,16,17]. However, the definitive diagnosis must be based on histopathological examination [3,13,14] of tissue samples according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification [12,18]. One study has demonstrated a low accuracy of 53.3% and 60% for predicted tumour grade and type, respectively, based on MRI features and histopathology [19]. Moreover, high-field MRI has demonstrated sensitivities of 0–91.1% and specificities ranges of 84.8–99.3% for histopathologically confirmed intracranial lesions [20]. Therefore, caution should be paramount when comparing diagnostic features and outcomes, particularly between studies with presumptive and confirmed intracranial tumours.
Several studies have reported survival times of presumptive or confirmed gliomas following palliative treatment, surgical debulking, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, either alone or in combination [3,21,22]. Regardless of the treatment used, intracranial gliomas are associated with a poor prognosis, and the most effective treatment is yet to be defined [3,21,22]. Due to this circumstance, and the lack of histopathological type and grade of the tumour, it is difficult for the owner to opt for a specific treatment, a combination, or euthanasia.
There are, however, no reported cases of gliomas treated with surgery followed by a combination of different oral chemotherapies (temozolomide alone or temozolomide combined with other chemotherapy agents) or surgical reintervention.
The primary objective of this descriptive retrospective study is to report the times of progression and survival times of a group of dogs with histologically confirmed intracranial gliomas treated with debulking surgery and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. The secondary objective is to describe the effects of surgical reintervention in the survival time as a treatment option after tumour relapse.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Selection and Data Collection

Cases with histopathologically diagnosed intracranial gliomas treated with surgical debulking followed by temozolomide chemotherapy were identified by searching the medical record database of a single veterinary referral hospital from 2014 to 2021. Informed written consent was obtained from the owners for diagnostic procedures and surgical interventions. Inclusion criteria were confirmed histopathological diagnosis, tumour debulking surgery, adjunctive chemotherapy treatment, and follow-up data until death. Cases were excluded from the retrospective analysis if the owner had declined chemotherapy, and if there was inadequate information available to the primary investigators, specifically including a lack of detail regarding the diagnostic, staging, and monitoring tests.

2.2. Medical Records

Data obtained from the medical records included the dog’s age, gender, reproductive status, breed, neurological signs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when available and computed tomography (CT) findings pre-and post-surgery, tumour location, surgical approach, temozolomide chemotherapy dose received, histologic tumour type and grade, time to progression, additional surgeries or chemotherapy rescue protocols, date and cause of death. The referring veterinarian(s) and/or owner(s) were contacted to follow up where additional detail was required.
A presumptive diagnosis of glioma was based on the neurological localization, pre-surgical CT with iodinated contrast 400 mg/kg IV (Omnipaque 300, General Electric’s Healthcare, Madrid, Spain), or MRI images with gadolinium contrast IV and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Neurological examination and surgical debulking were performed by the same board-certified veterinary neurologist. During the surgical procedure, biopsy samples were fixed in 10% formalin and submitted for histopathological analysis to confirm the diagnosis. An immediate CT scan of the brain (Brivo CT385 General Electric’s Healthcare, Madrid, Spain) was performed to assess the extent of macroscopic resection. Biopsy samples were reviewed by a board-certified veterinary pathologist and classified according to the WHO criteria [18].
After histopathological confirmation, adjuvant temozolomide (Temodal®, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Haarlem, The Netherlands) chemotherapy (76.4–181.8 mg/m2/24 h for 5 days every 3 weeks) was prescribed in all dogs [23,24]. Toxicities were graded according to the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG-CTCAE) following investigational therapy in dogs and cats v1.2 [25].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Kaplan-Meier (KM) product limit estimates [26] and 95% CI were calculated for time to progression and survival times. The time to progression was calculated from the day of imaging diagnosis until the progression of neurological clinical signs compatible with tumour regrowth or advanced imaging confirmation. Death was attributed to recurrence of the tumour if there was imaging confirmation or neurological deterioration, and the neurolocalization was consistent with the previous tumour location. Censoring was applied in cases where death was not related to the tumour. If no information on the cause of death was available or the case was lost in follow-up, it was assumed to be related to the tumour. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

Seventy-six dogs with presumptive gliomas based on advanced imaging characteristics (CT or MRI) were diagnosed during the study period, (2014–2021) but lacked histopathological confirmation. Fifteen additional dogs with histopathological diagnosis of intracranial glioma were intervened during the same period. One dog was censored from survival time analysis because it was euthanatized due to aspiration pneumonia in the postoperative period after the second surgery, and another dog was excluded because the owner had declined chemotherapy. A total of 14 dogs were therefore included in this study (Table 1). The most represented breed was the French bulldog (n = 10/14), with the Boxer (n = 2/14), English bulldog (n = 1/14), and Boxer mix (n = 1/14) marginally represented, all of them brachycephalic in conformation. There were 9/14 females (8/9 neutered and 1/9 entire) and 5/14 males (4/5 neutered and 1/5 entire). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 8 years (range: 4–10 years). The median weight was 14 kg (range 8.9–37.2 kg).
Neurological examination at the time of initial presentation was available in all dogs. The most common neurological signs in order of frequency included seizures (n = 13/14 dogs, 92.9%), followed by obtundation (n = 3/14, 21.4%), circling (n = 3/14, 21.4%), proprioceptive deficits (n = 7/14, 50%) and cranial nerve deficits (n = 6/14, 42.9%) including decreased menace response (n = 5/14, 35.7%). In three dogs, neurological examination at the time of first evaluation was considered normal.
In 13/14 dogs, the tumour had a rostrotentorial location (92.9%) and caudotentorial location in 1/14 dogs (7.1%). For rostrotentorial tumours, the frontal lobe (n = 7/14, 50%) was most affected with other localizations such as temporal lobe (n = 3/14, 21.4 %), olfactory bulb (n = 1/14, 7.1%), parietal lobe (n = 1/14, 7.1%) and occipital lobe (n = 1/14, 7.1%) less commonly observed. The only caudotentorial tumour was in the cerebellum (n = 1/14, 7.1 %) (Figure 1).
All dogs (14/14) were treated perioperatively with prednisone 0.5 mg/kg twice daily (Prednisone Alonga®, Famar Health Care, Madrid, Spain) and, when seizures were present (n = 13/14), with additional antiepileptics drugs such as phenobarbital 3–6 mg/kg twice daily (Luminal®, Kern Pharma, Barcelona, Spain) or/and levetiracetam 20–40 mg/kg three times a day (Keppra®, UCB Pharma SA, Brussels, Belgium). Maropitant 1 mg/kg IV (Cerenia® 10 mg/mL Zoetis, Madrid, Spain) was used preoperatively to prevent perianaesthetic vomiting. During the surgery, all dogs received mannitol 0.5 g/kg IV (Osmofundina concentrada 20%®, BBraun Medical S.A, Rubí, Spain); nine dogs received cefazoline 20 mg/kg IV three times a day (Cefazolina 1 g Normon®, Madrid, Spain) and five dogs received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 15 mg/kg IV twice daily (Soltrim®, Almirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain) when the surgical approach was through the frontal sinus.
Initial surgical approaches were selected according to the location of the tumour and included transfrontal (n = 9/14, 64.3%), temporal (n = 3/14, 21.4%), parietooccipital (n = 1/14, 7.1%) and suboccipital (n = 1/14, 7.1%) areas. In all dogs, surgical debulking was aimed at a total macroscopic resection. Bone flap or titanium mesh to replace the excised bone was not used in any dog. Four dogs were reintervened when tumour relapse was suspected based on advanced imaging findings. One dog was operated on three times: twice with a transfrontal approach and once frontoparietal when the tumour extended caudally. Three dogs were surgically treated twice: two transfrontally, and in the third case, an initial suboccipital approach was combined with a parietooccipital approach during the second surgery.
Following surgical discharge, all dogs were treated with a dose of prednisone 0.5 mg/kg twice daily, which was gradually decreased. Dogs with seizures (13/14) also received antiepileptic drugs, phenobarbital 3–6 mg/kg twice daily or/and levetiracetam 20–40 mg/kg three times a day.
Short-term surgical complications included subclinical pneumocephalus after the surgery in all patients, and aspiration pneumonia two days after the surgery leading to euthanasia in one patient. Neurological status following surgery was unchanged or showed mild deterioration, but all dogs were ambulatory within 24 h post-surgery. Other life-threatening complications or long-term neurological deterioration were not encountered.
Using the WHO Grading classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System [18], the neoplasia type resected during the first surgery included oligodendroglial tumours (n = 12/14, 85.7%) and astrocytic tumours (2/14, 14.3%). The oligodendroglial lineage included oligodendroglioma grade II (n = 4/12, 33.3%) and anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III (n = 8/12, 66.7%). Both astrocytic tumours were glioblastoma grade IV (n = 2/2, 100%).
Four dogs were reintervened surgically (4/14): once in three dogs (3/4) and twice in one dog (1/4). In three reintervened dogs, the tumour type did not change (oligodendroglioma grade III in one dog was operated on twice and in the one operated on three times, and oligodendroglioma grade II in the other one operated on twice). Only in one dog operated on twice did the tumour type change from anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III after the first surgery to gliosarcoma grade IV after the second surgery.
After histopathological confirmation, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. All dogs received temozolomide (Temodal®, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Haarlem, The Netherlands) 76,4–181,8 mg/m2/24h for 5 days every 3 weeks within 1–3 weeks after the first surgery. Nine dogs (9/14) received only temozolomide, with the remaining five dogs (5/14) receiving additional rescue chemotherapy after a confirmed or suspected tumour relapse.
In two dogs receiving rescue chemotherapy (2/5), the treatment was changed to lomustine (CeeNU®, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) at 70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (one suspected relapse after CT imaging and one confirmed after a second tumour debulking and histopathology). Whereas in two dogs (2/5), chemotherapy was changed to toceranib phosphate (Palladia®, Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) 2.5–2.8 mg/kg 3 times weekly (one suspected relapse after CT imaging and the other confirmed after a second tumour debulking and histopathology). In this last dog reintervened surgically, a new relapse was suspected while it was receiving toceranib phosphate and underwent a third surgery. At that stage, toceranib phosphate was replaced by lomustine 70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Finally, in the last dog (1/5), temozolomide was replaced with melphalan (Alkeran®, Aspen Pharmacare S.L., Dublin, Ireland) at 0.15 mg/kg for 5 days every 3 weeks after the dog showed signs of clinical deterioration without tumour relapse confirmation. In the dog euthanatized two days after the second surgery due to aspiration pneumonia, two postoperative CT scans within 48 h failed to show an intracranial haemorrhage or brain oedema as the cause of deterioration.
Side effects of chemotherapy protocols were only observed in one dog with petechiae, haematuria, and pancytopenia (grade 2) [25] after the second temozolomide cycle. Clinical and laboratory abnormalities were resolved six weeks after temozolomide discontinuation, and tumour recurrence was observed after a control CT at that time.
The overall MTP was 156 days (95% CI 133–320 days) (Figure 2) and MST was 240 days (95% CI 149–465 days) (Figure 3). For dogs treated surgically twice, ST was 241, 428, and 468 days. For the dog treated surgically three times, ST was 780 days. The dog euthanatized two days after the second surgery due to aspiration pneumonia was censored from the survival analysis. Dogs surviving the immediate postoperative period (13/14) were euthanatized, 3/13 due to histopathologically confirmed tumour relapse, 2/13 after observed tumour recurrence in CT imaging, and 8/13 after neurological deterioration for suspected tumour relapse.

4. Discussion

Common therapeutic options available for veterinary patients with intracranial neoplasia include palliative care, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, either alone or combined [3,21,22].
For histologically confirmed gliomas, therapies and outcomes vary between studies. Those describing palliative treatment (glucocorticoids, antiepileptic drugs, and analgesics) included 22 dogs, where the survival time ranged between 1–492 days [2,27]. In one recent study, including 14 dogs treated with surgery alone, the MST was 66 days (range: 10–730 days) [9]. With a combination of surgery and radiotherapy, the MST increased to 300 days (range: 60–405 days) according to another study with 13 dogs [27]. The use of surgery and intratumoral chemotherapy (chlorambucil and lomustine) in 8 dogs achieved an MST of 257 days [28]. In one case report of an anaplastic oligodendroglioma treated with radiotherapy and lomustine, the dog lived for 910 days [29], whereas intratumoral temozolomide was used in three dogs, but long-term survival time was not reported [30].
In cases of presumptive diagnoses, treatment with radiotherapy achieved MST of 255 and 636 days in a total of 33 dogs in two different studies [16,27], while in another two studies, including 96 dogs treated with oral lomustine, MST of 93 and 138 days were reported [31,32] (Table 2).
However, there is a paucity of clinically relevant data on type-specific therapeutic outcomes for canine intracranial neoplasia [2,3,21]. In addition, current experimental therapeutic studies lack comparison between different tumour types or grades [14,28,33,34].
Previous studies have observed a breed association of specific neoplasms such as gliomas with brachycephalic breeds [1,4]. This finding is in accordance with our results, where all the dogs had this head conformation. Future genetic investigations might shed some light on the underlying causes of this association.
Most published clinical studies evaluating outcomes for intracranial gliomas in veterinary patients are based on diagnostic imaging characteristics and lack histopathological confirmation [16,17]. Additional single cases or case series also have this important limitation [31,32,35]. Considering that the accuracy of MR imaging for predicting tumour type has been reported as 70% [36], some of the cases included in those studies might not represent true gliomas, and the survival time might be erroneously prolonged in non-neoplastic lesions. In one recent article, the MRI accuracy to distinguish between gliomas and meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) was found to have a sensitivity between 76–89% and a specificity between 77–81% after processing texture analysis [37]. Another study demonstrated 94.4% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity of MRI detecting a brain lesion for classifying neoplastic and inflammatory disease [20]. To allow a more accurate comparison with our results, our discussion will centre on surgically confirmed or post-mortem cases from the previous veterinary literature.
In human medicine, first-line management of intracranial gliomas includes maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and six cycles of maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy [38,39]. Lomustine probably remains the most commonly drug used after temozolomide for glioma treatment. However, lomustine is regarded as the main standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma in Europe [38].
Currently, the preferred treatment option for gliomas in veterinary medicine is radiotherapy; however, most published studies using this treatment modality lack histopathological confirmation [16,17,35]. Due to the limited availability of radiotherapy equipment, the need for repeated anaesthesia, and side effects, other therapeutic options have also been explored [3,9,17,21,28,31,32].
Clinical data of intracranial gliomas treated with chemotherapy is limited [2,3,21,28,29,30,31,32], but overall, the outcome results are disappointing [2,3,17,28,29,30,31,32]. As mentioned previously, the main drawback when comparing the scarcity of published clinical studies is the lack of histopathological analysis of biopsy samples when chemotherapy has been used [31,32]. In addition, these studies usually involve a small number of cases, and the protocols, including chemotherapy agents and doses, are variable.
The most frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs for confirmed gliomas are alkylating agents such as lomustine, carmustine, temozolomide, or antimetabolite hydroxyurea, all of which penetrate the blood-brain barrier [2,3,28,29,30]. Studies using either of these agents in confirmed cases have reported an MST of 56 days only with chemotherapy treatment [2] or 206 and 257 days using chemotherapy and surgical treatment in two different studies [2,28]. In veterinary medicine, the reported dose used for temozolomide is 60–100mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks [23,24]. These survival times are comparable with dogs in our study who underwent one surgical debulking and temozolomide chemotherapy, but is shorter than in dogs who underwent two or three surgeries and a chemotherapy protocol change.
Surgical resection only with curative intent has been used to treat intracranial gliomas in two studies with an MST of 66 [9] and 114 days [2]. For our subset of dogs operated on once followed by temozolomide, the MST was 181 days (95% CI 53–444 days), which compares favourably when only chemotherapy [2] or surgery was used [2,9].
Reoperating for recurrent low-grade gliomas has improved the MST in human medicine [40]. Moreover, for aggressive glioblastomas, surgical reintervention is used to prolong the survival time in selected human patients once radiotherapy or chemotherapy fails to control its growth. To the authors’ knowledge, surgical reintervention has never been reported in canine gliomas, and only two dogs with intracranial meningiomas have been reoperated [9]. In our case series, survival times were 241, 428, and 468 days for dogs treated twice surgically, whereas the dog treated surgically three times survived for 780 days after diagnosis. These results show a longer survival time than dogs with a single surgical debulking. It is possible that both repeating surgical debulking and changing the chemotherapy agent contributed to achieving these results. Another possible explanation is that committed owners are open to trying another surgery and protocol given the good recovery from the first debulking and lack of side effects from the chemotherapy in their dogs. Although the number of reoperated dogs is low, our results open the possibility of exploring this option for selected cases.
For radiotherapy in gliomas confirmed either surgically or post-mortem, previous studies have reported MST of 94 [2] and 300 days [27]. Anecdotally, a single canine case with a post-mortem diagnosis of anaplastic oligodendroglioma was treated with radiotherapy and lomustine and lived for 910 days [29]. Repeated radiotherapy is increasingly used in human patients with recurrent gliomas; however, this approach poses the risk of radiation necrosis if the tolerance of normal brain tissue has exceeded, leading to neurological signs similar to those caused by tumour recurrence or the development of radiation-induced tumours [41]. In one study, radiation necrosis was suspected as the cause of death or euthanasia in 14.5% of the dogs included (12/83) [41].
The cause of death in our study was tumour-related euthanasia due to histopathologically confirmed tumour relapse (3/13), after an observed tumour recurrence in CT imaging (2/13), and after neurological deterioration for suspected tumour relapse (8/13). Only one dog was euthanatized in the immediate postoperative period due to aspiration pneumonia after the second surgery. This dog recovered from the anaesthetic procedure but developed a laboured respiratory pattern and respiratory acidosis within five hours, requiring intermittent ventilation. In addition to the immediate postoperative CT scan, two additional CT scans within 48 h failed to show intracranial haemorrhage or brain oedema as the reason for the deterioration; therefore, it was attributed to its brachycephalic conformation. Aspiration pneumonia has been reported as the most common non-neurological postoperative complication (12%) after intracranial surgery, but these studies have not shown a higher incidence in brachycephalic breeds [42,43,44].
Temozolomide for the doses administered in our study appears safe to use in dogs with confirmed intracranial gliomas. In the only dog with associated side effects, those ceased after discontinuation and supportive care. It remains unclear whether higher temozolomide doses might have been more effective in controlling tumour regrowth without increasing the probability of side effects. As a result, the combination treatment of our study (surgery and chemotherapy) appears to be a safe therapeutic option with longer MST than those reported for palliative treatment of canine brain tumours with an ST range of 7–70 days [21,45] or surgical resection only with MST of 66 days [9] in one study and 114 days [2] in another study. Moreover, in dogs operated twice or three times, the MST increased compared to the time of imaging recurrence, which makes repeated resections of recurrent gliomas an approach to consider when enough viable brain tissue remains to ensure a good quality of life.
The main limitations of the study include the limited number of cases, its retrospective nature, and the combination of surgical debulking and adjuvant chemotherapy without standardised protocols. Direct comparison of survival times for such heterogeneous treatments becomes complicated, and it is difficult to determine the exact influence of each modality used in the outcome. In addition, variables such as age, severity, and duration of neurological signs, location of the neoplasm (rostrotentorial vs. caudotentorial), and adjuvant chemotherapy protocol administered (single or multiple chemotherapies) might have influenced the MST. In this study, the low number of cases precludes any strong conclusion but opens the door to exploring a multitherapeutic approach in future clinical research.
Table
Table 2. Median survival times of canine glioma treatment studies to date with treatment modalities and comparison with the results of our study.
Table 2. Median survival times of canine glioma treatment studies to date with treatment modalities and comparison with the results of our study.
StudyAnimals NumberTumourDiagnosisChemotherapy/Radiotherapy TreatmentSurgeryMedian ST (Days)
Presumptive
Van Meervenne, S. et al. (2012) [31]56 dogsIntra or extra-axialPresumptive (CT)LomustineNo93
Moirano, S. et al. (2018)3240 dogsGliomasPresumptive (MRI)LomustineNo138
Magalhães, TR. et al. (2021) [35]16 dogsGliomasPresumptive (MRI)RadiotherapyNo512
Dolera, M. et al. (2017) [17]22 dogsGliomasPresumptive (MRI)RadiotherapyNo383
Dolera, M. et al. (2017) [17]20 dogsGliomasPresumptive (MRI)Radiotherapy and temozolomideNo420
Moirano, S. et al. (2020) [16]5 dogsGliomasPresumptive (MRI)Radiotherapy and chemotherapy (lomustine, hydroxyurea, temozolomide or toceranib phosphate)No636
Necropsy
José-López, R. et al. (2021) [2]12 dogsGliomasDefinitive (MRI and necropsy)Chemotherapy (lomustine, temozolomide, cytarabine and clinical trial drug)No56
Adams et al. (2005) [27]12 dogsGliomasDefinitive (MRI and necropsy)RadiotherapyNo255
José-López, R. et al. (2021) [2]1 dogGlioma undefined (high-grade)Definitive (MRI and necropsy)RadiotherapyNo29
Hasegawa, D. et al. (2012) [29]1 dogAnaplastic OligodendrogliomaDefinitive (MRI and necropsy)Radiotherapy and lomustineNo910
Biopsy
Suñol, A. et al. (2017) [9]14 dogsGliomas (8 oligodendrogliomas, 4 astrocytomas, and 2 anaplastic gliomas)Definitive (MRI and biopsy)NoYes66
José-López, R. et al. (2021) [2]4 dogsOligodendrogliomaDefinitive (MRI and biopsy)NoYes125 days
José-López, R. et al. (2021) [2]3 dogsOligodendroglioma (high-grade)Definitive (MRI and biopsy)Chemotherapy (lomustine and temozolomide)Yes206 days
Hicks, J. et al. (2019) [30]4 dogsGliomas (1 gliomasglioblastoma multiforme and 3 oligodendroglioma)Definitive (MRI and biopsy)Intratumoral temozolomide microcylindersYesNot reported
Bentley, R. et al. (2018) [28]8 dogsGliomas (7 oligodendrogliomas and 1 astrocytoma (6 high grade, 2 low grade)Definitive (MRI and biopsy)Chlorambucil and lomustineYes257 days
Adams et al. (2005) [27]13 dogsGliomasDefinitive (MRI and biopsy)RadiotherapyYes300
José-López, R. et al. (2021) [2]1 dogGlioma undefined (high-grade)Definitive (MRI and biopsy)RadiotherapyYes94 days
Our study14 dogsGliomas (4 oligodendroglioma, 8 anaplastic oligodendroglioma and 2 glioblastoma grade IV)Definitive (MRI or CT and biopsy)Temozolomide and toceranib phosphate, lomustine and/or melphalanYes240 days
ST = survival time, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, CT = computed tomography.

5. Conclusions

Despite the limitations of the study, including the low number of cases and its retrospective nature, combined surgical debulking and adjuvant chemotherapy in canine intracranial gliomas is a feasible therapeutic option, in particular for countries where radiation facilities are lacking or their availability is scarce. We observed a longer MST compared to previous literature using different approaches, such as surgery or chemotherapy alone, which might settle the base for additional research to set up protocols for effective treatments. In addition, surgical reintervention increased survival time in our cases, which should be investigated in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.F.-P.; methodology, A.L.F.-P.; software, J.F.B.M.; validation, A.L.F.-P., E.H.C., A.F.M., M.P.i.B. and J.F.B.M.; formal analysis, A.L.F.-P., E.H.C., M.P.i.B. and A.F.M.; investigation, A.L.F.-P., E.H.C., A.F.M., J.F.B.M. and M.P.i.B.; data curation, E.H.C. and A.L.F.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.H.C. and A.L.F.-P.; writing—review and editing, E.H.C., A.F.M., J.F.B.M., M.P.i.B. and A.L.F.-P.; supervision, A.L.F.-P.; project administration, A.L.F.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The work described in this manuscript involved the use of non-experimental owned animals; as such, national law does not consider owned animals in regulating experimental studies requiring review by an ethical committee. Established internationally recognized high standards (‘best practice’) of veterinary clinical care for the individual patient were always followed. Ethical approval from a committee was therefore not specifically required.

Data Availability Statement

All available data is contained within the article and tables.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all the staff involved in treating these dogs for their dedication and commitment to the animal’s care.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Song, R.; Vite, C.; Bradley, C.; Cross, J. Postmortem Evaluation of 435 Cases of Intracranial Neoplasia in Dogs and Relationship of Neoplasm with Breed, Age, and Body Weight. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. José-López, R.; Gutierrez-Quintana, R.; de la Fuente, C.; Manzanilla, E.G.; Suñol, A.; Castro, D.P.; Añor, S.; Sánchez-Masian, D.; Fernández-Flores, F.; Ricci, E.; et al. Clinical features, diagnosis, and survival analysis of dogs with glioma. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2021, 35, 1902–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dickinson, P. Advances in Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities for Intracranial Tumors. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2014, 28, 1165–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McGrath, J.T. Intracranial Pathology of the Dog. Acta Neuropathol. 1962, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Snyder, J.M.; Shofer, F.S.; Winkle, T.J.; Massicotte, C. Canine Intracranial Primary Neoplasia: 173 Cases (1986–2003). J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2006, 20, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Truvé, K.; Dickinson, P.; York, D. Evaluation of Selective Sweeps for Brachycephaly in Dogs and Associated Susceptibility Loci for Glioma. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Canine and Feline Genomics and Inherited Diseases, Visby, Sweden, 28 May–1 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagley, R.S.; Gavin, P.R.; Moore, M.P.; Silver, G.M.; Harrington, M.L.; Connors, R.L. Clinical signs associated with brain tumors in dogs: 97 cases (1992–1997). J. Am. Veter-Med Assoc. 1999, 215, 818–819. [Google Scholar]
  8. Westworth, D.; Dickinson, P.; Vernau, W.; Johnson, E.; Bollen, A.; Kass, P.; Sturges, B.; Vernau, K.; Lecouteur, R.; Higgins, R. Choroid Plexus Tumors in 56 Dogs (1985–2007). J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suñol, A.; Mascort, J.; Font, C.; Bastante, A.R.; Pumarola, M.; Feliu-Pascual, A.L. Long-term follow-up of surgical resection alone for primary intracranial rostrotentorial tumors in dogs: 29 cases (2002–2013). Open Vet. J. 2017, 7, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hayes Jr, H.M.; Priester, W.A.; Pendergrass, T.W. Occurrence of nervous-tissue tumors in cattle, horses, cats and dogs. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 15, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Snyder, J.; Lipitz, L.; Skorupski, K.; Shofer, F.; Van Winkle, T. Secondary Intracranial Neoplasia in the Dog: 177 Cases (1986–2003). J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sturges, B.; Dickinson, P.; Bollen, A.; Koblik, P.; Kass, P.; Kortz, G.; Vernau, K.; Knipe, M.; LeCouteur, R.; Higgins, R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histological Classification of Intracranial Meningiomas in 112 Dogs. J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bentley, R.; Ober, C.; Anderson, K.; Feeney, D.; Naughton, J.; Ohlfest, J.; O’Sullivan, M.; Miller, M.; Constable, P.; Pluhar, G. Canine intracranial gliomas: Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging criteria and tumor type and grade. Veter. J. 2013, 198, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. MacLellan, J.D.; Arnold, S.A.; Dave, A.C.; Hunt, M.A.; Pluhar, G.E. Association of magnetic resonance imaging–based preoperative tumor volume with postsurgical survival time in dogs with primary intracranial glioma. J. Am. Veter. Med Assoc. 2018, 252, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hicks, J.; Platt, S.; Kent, M.; Haley, A. Canine brain tumours: A model for the human disease? Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 15, 252–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moirano, S.J.; Dewey, C.W.; Haney, S.; Yang, J. Efficacy of frameless stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of presumptive canine intracranial gliomas: A retrospective analysis (2014–2017). Veter. Comp. Oncol. 2020, 18, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dolera, M.; Malfassi, L.; Bianchi, C.; Carrara, N.; Finesso, S.; Marcarini, S.; Mazza, G.; Pavesi, S.; Sala, M.; Urso, G. Frameless stereotactic radiotherapy alone and combined with temozolomide for presumed canine gliomas. Veter. Comp. Oncol. 2017, 16, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Louis, D.N.; Ohgaki, H.; Wiestler, O.D.; Cavenee, W.K.; Burger, P.C.; Jouvet, A.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Kleihues, P. The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol. 2007, 114, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stadler, K.L.; Ruth, J.D.; Pancotto, T.E.; Werre, S.R.; Rossmeisl, J.H. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Are Equivalent in Mensuration and Similarly Inaccurate in Grade and Type Predictability of Canine Intracranial Gliomas. Front. Veter. Sci. 2017, 4, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wolff, C.; Holmes, S.; Young, B.; Chen, A.; Kent, M.; Platt, S.; Savage, M.; Schatzberg, S.; Fosgate, G.; Levine, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Differentiation of Neoplastic, Inflammatory, and Cerebrovascular Brain Disease in Dogs. J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2012, 26, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miller, A.D.; Miller, C.; Rossmeisl, J.H. Canine Primary Intracranial Cancer: A Clinicopathologic and Comparative Review of Glioma, Meningioma, and Choroid Plexus Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rossmeisl, J.H.; Jones, J.C.; Zimmerman, K.L.; Robertson, J.L. Survival time following hospital discharge in dogs with palliatively treated primary brain tumors. J. Am. Veter. Med Assoc. 2013, 242, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dervisis, N.G.; Dominguez, P.A.; Sarbu, L.; Newman, R.G.; Cadile, C.D.; Swanson, C.N.; Kitchell, B.E. Efficacy of temozolomide or dacarbazine in combination with an anthracycline for rescue chemotherapy in dogs with lymphoma. J. Am. Veter. Med Assoc. 2007, 231, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cancedda, S.; Bley, C.R.; Aresu, L.; Dacasto, M.; Leone, V.F.; Pizzoni, S.; Gracis, M.; Marconato, L. Efficacy and side effects of radiation therapy in comparison with radiation therapy and temozolomide in the treatment of measurable canine malignant melanoma. Veter. Comp. Oncol. 2014, 14, e146–e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. LeBlanc, A.K.; Atherton, M.; Bentley, R.T.; Boudreau, C.E.; Burton, J.H.; Curran, K.M.; Dow, S.; Giuffrida, M.A.; Kellihan, H.B.; Mason, N.J.; et al. Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group—Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ( VCOG-CTCAE v2) following investigational therapy in dogs and cats. Veter- Comp. Oncol. 2021, 19, 311–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rich, J.T.; Neely, J.G.; Paniello, R.C.; Voelker, C.C.J.; Nussenbaum, B.; Wang, E. A practical guide to understanding Kaplan-Meier curves. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 2010, 143, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adams, V.J.; Platt, S.R.; Garosi, L.S.; Murphy, S.; Abramson, C.J. Survival Analysis of Canine Gliomas and Meningiomas Treated with Corticosteroids Hypofractionated Radiother-Apy or Surgery and Radiotherapy. In Proceedings of the BSAVA Congress, Birmingham, UK, 7–10 April 2005; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bentley, R.T.; Thomovsky, S.A.; Miller, M.A.; Knapp, D.W.; Cohen-Gadol, A.A. Canine (Pet Dog) Tumor Microsurgery and Intratumoral Concentration and Safety of Metronomic Chlorambucil for Spontaneous Glioma: A Phase I Clinical Trial. World Neurosurg. 2018, 116, e534–e542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hasegawa, D.; Uchida, K.; Kuwabara, T.; Mizoguchi, S.; Yayoshi, N.; Fujita, M. Long-Term Survival in a Dog with Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma Treated with Radiation Therapy and CCNU. J. Veter. Med Sci. 2012, 74, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hicks, J.; Platt, S.; Stewart, G.; Senneca, C.; Holmes, S.; Kent, M.; Howerth, E.; Kaplan, J.; Kaplan, E. Intratumoral temozolomide in spontaneous canine gliomas: Feasibility of a novel therapy using implanted microcylinders. Veter. Med. Sci. 2018, 5, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Meervenne, S.; Verhoeven, P.S.; De Vos, J.; Gielen, I.M.V.L.; Polis, I.; Van Ham, L.M.L. Comparison between symptomatic treatment and lomustine supplementation in 71 dogs with intracranial, space-occupying lesions. Veter. Comp. Oncol. 2012, 12, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moirano, S.J.; Dewey, C.W.; Wright, K.; Cohen, P.W. Survival times in dogs with presumptive intracranial gliomas treated with oral lomustine: A comparative retrospective study (2008–2017). Veter. Comp. Oncol. 2018, 16, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rossmeisl, J.H.; Herpai, D.; Quigley, M.; E Cecere, T.; Robertson, J.L.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Hinckley, J.; Tatter, S.B.; Dickinson, P.J.; Debinski, W. Phase I trial of convection-enhanced delivery of IL13RA2 and EPHA2 receptor targeted cytotoxins in dogs with spontaneous intracranial gliomas. Neuro-Oncology 2020, 23, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Freeman, A.C.; Platt, S.R.; Holmes, S.; Kent, M.; Robinson, K.; Howerth, E.; Eagleson, J.; Bouras, A.; Kaluzova, M.; Hadjipanayis, C.G. Convection-enhanced delivery of cetuximab conjugated iron-oxide nanoparticles for treatment of spontaneous canine intracranial gliomas. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2018, 137, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Magalhães, T.R.; Benoît, J.; Néčová, S.; North, S.; Queiroga, F.L. Outcome After Radiation Therapy in Canine Intracranial Meningiomas or Gliomas. In Vivo 2021, 35, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ródenas, S.; Pumarola, M.; Gaitero, L.; Zamora, À.; Añor, S. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 40 dogs with histologically confirmed intracranial tumours. Veter. J. 2011, 187, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wanamaker, M.W.; Vernau, K.M.; Taylor, S.L.; Cissell, D.D.; Abdelhafez, Y.G.; Zwingenberger, A.L. Classification of neoplastic and inflammatory brain disease using MRI texture analysis in 119 dogs. Veter. Radiol. Ultrasound 2021, 62, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Weller, M.; Le Rhun, E. How did lomustine become standard of care in recurrent glioblastoma? Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 87, 102029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weller, M.; van den Bent, M.; Preusser, M.; Le Rhun, E.; Tonn, J.C.; Minniti, G.; Bendszus, M.; Balana, C.; Chinot, O.; Dirven, L.; et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 18, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramakrishna, R.; Hebb, A.; Barber, J.; Rostomily, R.; Silbergeld, D.; Ramakrishna, R.; Hebb, A.; Barber, J.; Rostomily, R.; Silbergeld, D. Outcomes in Reoperated Low-Grade Gliomas. Neurosurgery 2015, 77, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brearley, M.J.; Jeffery, N.D.; Phillips, S.M.; Dennis, R. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy of Brain Masses in Dogs: A Retrospective Analysis of Survival of 83 Cases (1991–1996). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 1999, 13, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Forward, A.K.; Volk, H.A.; De Decker, S. Postoperative survival and early complications after intracranial surgery in dogs. Veter. Surg. 2018, 47, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fransson, B.A.; Bagley, R.S.; Gay, J.M.; Silver, G.M.; Gokhale, S.; Sanders, S.; Connors, R.L.; Gavin, P.R. Pneumonia after intracranial surgery in dogs. Veter. Surg. 2001, 30, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lindsay, B.; Cook, D.; Wetzel, J.; Siess, S.; Moses, P. Brachycephalic airway syndrome: Management of post-operative respiratory complications in 248 dogs. Aust. Veter. J. 2020, 98, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hu, H.; Barker, A.; Harcourt-Brown, T.; Jeffery, N.D. Systematic Review of Brain Tumor Treatment in Dogs. J. Veter. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 1456–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vetsci 09 00427 g001 550
Figure 1. Transverse pre (A) and post (B) contrast CT brain image with soft tissue algorithm. The images reveal an intra-axial, ill-defined round, hypoattenuating lesion located in the left frontal lobe of the cerebrum. The lesion shows ring enhancement after ionated contrast administration and a slight midline shift to the right. Histopathological diagnosis was oligodendroglioma grade II.
Figure 1. Transverse pre (A) and post (B) contrast CT brain image with soft tissue algorithm. The images reveal an intra-axial, ill-defined round, hypoattenuating lesion located in the left frontal lobe of the cerebrum. The lesion shows ring enhancement after ionated contrast administration and a slight midline shift to the right. Histopathological diagnosis was oligodendroglioma grade II.
Vetsci 09 00427 g001
Vetsci 09 00427 g002 550
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier median time to progression (MTP) curve of all dogs.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier median time to progression (MTP) curve of all dogs.
Vetsci 09 00427 g002
Vetsci 09 00427 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier median survival time (MST) curve of all dogs. The only censored patient is marked.
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier median survival time (MST) curve of all dogs. The only censored patient is marked.
Vetsci 09 00427 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical data of dogs diagnosed with gliomas treated with surgery and chemotherapy.
Table 1. Clinical data of dogs diagnosed with gliomas treated with surgery and chemotherapy.
BreedSexNeutered (Y/N)Age (yrs)Weight (kg)Primary ComplaintNeurological ExamTumour LocalizationSurgery (N)HistopathologyChemotherapyTumour RelapseSurvival Time (Days)Cause Death
French BulldogMY813.0SeizuresLeft circling and right proprioceptive deficitsLeft temporal lobe1Glioblastoma grade IVTemozolomide (181.8 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected456Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogFY89.8SeizuresObtunded mental status, right circling, ambulatory tetraparesis, decreased left menace response and facial sensationRight frontal lobe1Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade IIITemozolomide (109.0 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected190Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogMN914.6SeizuresNormalRight temporal lobe1Oligodendroglioma grade IITemozolomide (100.0 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected300Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogFY99.2SeizuresDecreased menace response OSRight temporal lobe1Glioblastoma grade IVTemozolomide (93.0 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected150Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
BoxerFY1037.2SeizuresObtunded mental status, right circling, ambulatory tetraparesis, decreased left menace response and facial sensationLeft frontal lobe1Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III1st Temozolomide (110. mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks) 2nd Melphalan (0.15 mg/kg for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected493Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogFY1015.3SeizuresMild right proprioceptive deficitsLeft frontal lobe1Oligodendroglioma grade IITemozolomide (100.0 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected51Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogMN714.0SeizuresNormalLeft frontal lobe1Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade IIITemozolomide (76.9 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected160Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
French BulldogMN713.5SeizuresNormalLeft frontal lobe1Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade IIITemozolomide (76.9 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)Suspected180Euthanasia due to clinical signs of relapse
English BulldogFY425.5Obtundedmental statusRight circling, left proprioceptive deficits, decreased menace response OSLeft cerebellum1Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III1st Temozolomide (160.9 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)CT confirmed120Euthanasia due to tumour regrowth
French BulldogMN513.3SeizuresMild right proprioceptive deficits and decreased menace response ODLeft frontal lobe1Oligodendroglioma grade II1st Temozolomide 181.8 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks) 2nd Lomustine (70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks)CT confirmed240Euthanasia due to tumour regrowth
BoxerFN928.5SeizuresLumbosacral painRight occipital lobe21st Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III 2nd Gliosarcoma grade IV1st Temozolomide (76.9 mg/m2 for 5 días every 3 weeks) 2nd Toceranib phosphate (2.8 mg/kg 3 times weekly)CT & biopsy confirmed241Euthanasia due to tumour regrowth
French BulldogFY88.9SeizuresDecrease pupillary reflex ODRight olfactory lobe21st Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III 2nd Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade IIITemozolomide (93.0 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks)CT & biopsy confirmed428Euthanasia due to aspiration pneumonia two days after the second surgery. CT ruled out IC haemorrhage
Boxer mixFY821.3SeizuresMild left proprioceptive deficitsLeft frontal lobe21st Oligodendroglioma grade II 2nd Oligodendroglioma grade II1st Temozolomide (76.4 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks) 2nd Lomustine (70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks)CT & biopsy confirmed468Euthanasia due to tumour regrowth
French BulldogFY814.5SeizuresLeft pelvic limb proprioceptive deficits and decreased menace response OSRight parietal lobe31st Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III 2nd Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III 3rd Anaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III1st Temozolomide (81.6 mg/m2 for 5 days every 3 weeks) 2nd Toceranib phosphate (2.5 mg/kg 3 times weekly) 3rd Lomustine (70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks)CT & biopsy confirmed780Euthanasia due to tumour regrowth
kg = kilograms; n = number; F = female; M = male; Y = yes; N = no; yrs = years; OS = left eye; OD = right eye, CT = computed tomography, IC = intracranial haemorrhage.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hidalgo Crespo, E.; Farré Mariné, A.; Pumarola i Battle, M.; Borrego Massó, J.F.; Luján Feliu-Pascual, A. Survival Time after Surgical Debulking and Temozolomide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Canine Intracranial Gliomas. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080427

AMA Style

Hidalgo Crespo E, Farré Mariné A, Pumarola i Battle M, Borrego Massó JF, Luján Feliu-Pascual A. Survival Time after Surgical Debulking and Temozolomide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Canine Intracranial Gliomas. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(8):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hidalgo Crespo, Emma, Alba Farré Mariné, Martí Pumarola i Battle, Juan Francisco Borrego Massó, and Alejandro Luján Feliu-Pascual. 2022. "Survival Time after Surgical Debulking and Temozolomide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Canine Intracranial Gliomas" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 8: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080427

APA Style

Hidalgo Crespo, E., Farré Mariné, A., Pumarola i Battle, M., Borrego Massó, J. F., & Luján Feliu-Pascual, A. (2022). Survival Time after Surgical Debulking and Temozolomide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Canine Intracranial Gliomas. Veterinary Sciences, 9(8), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9080427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop