Next Article in Journal
Cardiovascular Sequelae of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Neonates Born before 32 Weeks of Gestational Age: Impact of Associated Pulmonary and Systemic Hypertension
Previous Article in Journal
A Review Paper on Optical Coherence Tomography Evaluation of Coronary Calcification Pattern: Is It Relevant Today?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complex Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation in Children with Alagille Syndrome: An Early Single-Center Experience of a Successful Collaborative Work

by
Farida Karim
1,
Gurumurthy Hiremath
1,
Juan Carlos Samayoa
1 and
Sameh M. Said
2,3,*
1
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Masonic Children’s Hospital, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
2
Division of Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
3
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(8), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080232
Submission received: 14 April 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiac Surgery)

Abstract

:
Objective: In this paper, we share our single-center experience of successful multidisciplinary management of patients with Alagille syndrome. In addition, we aim to highlight the need for an Alagille program for effectively managing these patients, in general, and particularly peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis associated with this syndrome. Study Design: This is a retrospective review of six children with Alagille syndrome and advanced liver involvement who underwent pulmonary artery reconstruction between 2021 and 2022. Cardiac diagnosis, co-existing liver disease burdens, management approach, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: All the patients underwent one-stage extensive bilateral branch pulmonary rehabilitation. Concomitant procedures included repair of tetralogy of Fallot in one patient and repair of supravalvar pulmonary artery stenosis in two. One patient had balloon pulmonary branch angioplasty before surgery. In all patients, there was a decrease in right ventricular systolic pressure post-operatively. Three patients underwent liver transplantation for pre-existing liver dysfunction. At a median 3-year follow-up, all the patients were alive with their right ventricular systolic pressure less than half of their systemic systolic pressure. One patient underwent balloon angioplasty due to new and recurrent left pulmonary artery stenosis 13 months after surgery. Conclusion: Pulmonary arteries can be successfully rehabilitated surgically in the presence of complex branch disease. Patients with advanced liver disease can undergo successful complex pulmonary artery reconstruction, which can facilitate their future liver transplantation course. A multidisciplinary team approach is a key for successful management of Alagille patients.

1. Introduction

Alagille syndrome (ALGS) is a rare genetic multi-organ disease with frequent cardiovascular and hepatic system involvement. Other abnormalities include renal, ocular, neurological, facial, and/or skeletal defects. The majority of patients presented with symptoms in infancy and require a comprehensive multidisciplinary team evaluation. Due to the complex nature and interactions between the various organ systems, these patients present distinctive challenges in terms of management and timing of interventions if any are needed.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) has been reported in up to 90% of patients with ALGS [1]. The cardiovascular malformations range from peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis (PPAS) to Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) with pulmonary atresia and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (MAPCAs) [2]. Hepatic involvement in ALGS also has an extremely variable expression. It can range anywhere from mild cholestasis and paucity of the intrahepatic bile ducts to progressive liver failure. It is estimated that half of all patients with ALGS will eventually require liver transplantation (LTx) [3].
The subset of ALGS patients with concomitant complex CHD and liver disease is by far the most difficult to manage. One of the important considerations is the timing of cardiovascular repair in patients who develop advanced liver dysfunction with the potential need for LTx. There is often a reluctance to perform LTx in the setting of unrepaired CHDs, particularly when they involve right heart structures due to the presence of an elevated right ventricular/systemic venous pressure, which could compromise the outcomes or increase the risk of liver transplant. On the other hand, performing a complex cardiac operation on a patient with advanced liver disease significantly increases the peri- and post-operative risks and morbidity/mortality of the cardiac surgical procedure. Mainwaring et al. reported a four-fold higher relative risk of mortality compared to patients with mild or no liver dysfunction due to several reasons, such as sepsis, multisystem organ failure, massive pulmonary hemorrhage, and progression of liver disease [3].
Another challenge is the lack of consensus regarding the best management approach for PPAS. PPAS is found in less than 1% of patients with CHD [4]. Current practices vary from extensive surgical pulmonary artery (PA) reconstruction to transcatheter interventions. However, the goal of any of these interventions should be to effectively normalize right ventricular (RV) pressure and provide long-term outcomes with low morbidity, mortality, and acceptable freedom from re-intervention for these patients [5].
The purpose of this article is to highlight the need for developing ALGS programs based on a multidisciplinary group of subspecialties to address the unique needs of this challenging patient cohort. Through our multidisciplinary ALGS team, we were able to produce the following satisfactory results, which represent our early center’s multidisciplinary experience.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient and Procedure Characteristics

This is a single-center retrospective review of 6 pediatric patients (<18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of ALGS, who underwent extensive bilateral pulmonary arterial branch rehabilitation. The patient’s baseline characteristics (Table 1), surgical procedure details, peri-operative outcomes, and follow-up were reported. We summarized variables using median and range where specified; we reported counts for categorical variables. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota approved this study (STUDY ID 00017269, approval date: 10 October 2022).

2.2. Multidisciplinary Team Evaluation

Given the potential for multisystem involvement in ALGS, all 6 patients underwent a thorough multidisciplinary evaluation that included expertise in genetics, gastroenterology, hepatology, pulmonology, and hematology before any interventions. In particular, the hematologic workup included detailed assessments for thrombotic and bleeding risks to plan the peri-operative management of these patients carefully.
Of note, two out of the six patients were referred to cardiology from gastroenterology for LTx clearance due to pre-existing end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and were found to have concomitant PPAS. Patients with pre-existing liver involvement were risk-stratified by the best management strategy and timing of LTx in relation to the PPAS repair. Both patients with pre-existing ESLD were deemed to be at high risk for LTx without PPAS repair due to significantly elevated RVSP secondary to the multilevel right ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
In addition, the PELD (Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease) score within one month before the cardiac repairs was used for risk stratification of the remaining four patients. PELD determines prognoses and prioritizes recipients for LTx, for whom the higher the PELD score, the more severe the liver dysfunction [6]. Additional pre-operative discussion involved the critical care, cardiology, pediatric cardiac anesthesia, and pediatric cardiac surgical teams.

2.3. Technical Aspects of Branch Pulmonary Artery Surgical Rehabilitation

All the patients underwent one-stage midline bilateral branch PA rehabilitation. We have described the details of our procedure previously [7]. Briefly, after median sternotomy, an extensive bilateral branch PA dissection is performed before systemic heparinization (Figure 1A,B). All areas of anatomic concerns must be identified and prepared before the initiation of a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The extent of dissection depends on a thorough understanding of the pre-operative imaging studies and cardiac catheterization. CPB is then initiated with a single arterial and venous cannula, and the patients are cooled to 28 °C. The initial steps require transection of the main pulmonary artery above the sinotubular junction and separation of the main PA branches (Figure 2A). This is an important step for facilitating further dissection of the distal lobar/segmental branches. The right PA is then brought from behind the ascending aorta, either in between the ascending aorta and the superior vena cava (SVC) or lateral to the SVC, and stay sutures are placed to assist with retraction and branches’ exposure (Figure 2B). This allows further distal mobilization of the branches and allows the surgeon to reach the segmental-level branching (Figure 2C). The left branch is handled in a similar manner (Figure 2D). The preferred patch material is a decellularized pulmonary homograft patch, which is used to augment and relieve all stenotic branch segments. Once we are satisfied with the degree of augmentation of the pulmonary arteries, the right pulmonary artery is brought back behind the ascending aorta in its orthotopic position and anastomosed to the main/left PA (Figure 3A,B). If no associated procedures need to be completed, the patient is gradually rewarmed and weaned off CPB in the standard fashion. We routinely leave a right ventricular pressure line in the immediate post-bypass and post-operative period.
In the patient who requires repair of tetralogy of Fallot, once the pulmonary arterial reconstruction is completed, the SVC and inferior vena cava are cannulated. Cardioplegic arrest is then achieved, and intracardiac repair is performed in the standard fashion. A decision is then made regarding delayed sternal closure based on the ability to achieve satisfactory hemostasis or not. The detailed surgical procedures are summarized in Table 2.

3. Results

The present study summarizes our surgical experience with six consecutive ALGS patients who had severe PPAS causing right ventricular hypertension with systemic/suprasystemic right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and underwent complete cardiac repair (Figure 3C,D). The median age and weight at the time of surgery were 20.5 (7–18) months and 9 (4.9–10) kg, respectively. The baseline characteristics and details of cardiovascular abnormalities are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. One patient underwent transcatheter balloon angioplasty of the left PA and multiple bilateral segmental branches before surgery but had a persistent elevation in her RVSP.
Table 3 demonstrates the immediate hemodynamic and post-surgical outcomes. All six patients showed a drastic drop in their RVSP immediately post-operatively. The median number of patches used for the pulmonary arthroplasties was five (range 2–7). The median CPB time for the entire cohort was 459 min (range 192–409 min).
There was no peri-operative mortality. Three patients (50%) required delayed sternal closure. No peri-operative stroke or heart block required a pacemaker. The median length of hospital stay for the entire cohort was 16 days (range 7–168 days). One patient underwent LTx during the same admission. The median duration of follow-up was 20 months (max. 26 months).

3.1. Liver Disease Burden

All six patients had advanced involvement of the hepatobiliary system as evidenced by high pre-operative PELD scores, and three patients underwent LTx due to ESLD at one period during this study.
The three patients who underwent LTx had much higher pre-operative PELD scores compared to the rest of the group. Liver transplantation occurred in one patient one month after PA reconstruction and prior to hospital discharge. Two other patients’ LTx occurred at 12 and 15 months post-PA reconstruction.

3.2. Follow-Up and Late Outcomes

Table 4 describes the late hemodynamic analysis and late post-surgical outcomes. Only one patient, with tetralogy of Fallot, needed transcatheter intervention (balloon dilation of recurrent stenosis of the left PA and segmental branches of the left lower lobe) 13 months later.
Overall, surveillance computed tomography (CT) scans showed improved overall caliber of the branch pulmonary arteries in all the patients during their follow-up (Figure 4A–D). RVSP for all the patients remained less than 50% of the systemic arterial pressure during the follow-up period. One patient underwent kidney transplantation 17 months later due to progression to end-stage renal disease. There was no late mortality or re-operations.

4. Discussion

This single-center study represents an early experience with six patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of ALGS (Table 5) and underwent extensive surgical reconstruction of their PA branches. All the patients shared pre-operative systemic/suprasystemic RVSP and advanced liver disease.
During a follow-up period of 2.2 years, all the patients underwent a satisfactory complete repair with a significant drop in their RVSP pressure, relatively balanced pulmonary blood flow, and without the need for re-intervention, apart from one patient as described previously. Outcomes were particularly favorable in patients with isolated branch pulmonary artery stenosis, given no mortality, no re-intervention, and a late follow-up pulmonary artery pressure of less than one-half systemic in most cases. These findings are consistent with the results by Leong et al. who also report low post-operative RSVP and overall favorable surgical outcomes [2].
PPAS associated with ALGS affects both the central and peripheral PA and can be extensive with varied complexity. The main physiologic consequence of PPAS is right ventricular hypertension, leading to significant hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction. Monge et al. described the many different types of stenoses in this particular pathology, which include discrete stenoses located at the ostia or in the mid-vessel and long and tubular conformations [4]. They further reported that in their surgical experience, using homograft patch augmentation applies to all types of stenoses and effectively relieves the obstruction and effective relief of RV hypertension. Understanding these different patterns from pre-operative cardiac catheterization cross-sectional imaging is critical as it guides the surgeon in the operating room and ensures proper repair of these stenotic areas. We have used the same patch material in the current study as we believe it gives satisfactory long-term results and does not calcify or result in significant scarring in this particular location compared to other patch materials available.
The optimal treatment strategy for PPAS associated with ALGS continues to be debated among centers advocating either surgical or percutaneous PA interventions [5]. The reason for this is the rarity of both ALGS and PPAS. The decision tree in these cases takes into consideration the available expertise as well as whether the surgical experience outweighs the transcatheter one or vice versa. The group at Stanford University is a major proponent of primary surgical repair of PPAS, whether it is associated with ALGS or not, and this is based on their extensive experience in pulmonary arterial branch reconstruction from tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia and MAPCAs. However, ALGS patients are more challenging in terms of their disease burden, higher chance of recurrence of stenosis, and the associated multisystem organ involvement, which further increases the peri-operative risks. Luong et al. reported their experience with 51 patients with ALGS who underwent PA rehabilitation [2]. They concluded most patients with ALGS and severe PA stenosis can undergo repair with low post-operative RVSP with 90% survival after a complete repair at a median follow-up of 7.9 years. This is also congruent with other studies reporting freedom from pulmonary artery catheter-based re-intervention after the first surgery for isolated branch PPAS of 95% and 80% at 12 and 36 months, respectively [8].
Several reports have also demonstrated outcomes with percutaneous techniques for the management of PPAS associated with ALGS [9,10]. Lan et al. described that extensive catheter-based interventions reduced the median systolic main PA pressure (94.0 to 49.6 mm Hg) by 47% [5]. Although significant, this was a much smaller improvement than reported in the surgical literature for patients with William syndrome (66% reduction; 80 to 27 mm Hg) and ALGS (61% reduction; 75 to 29 mm Hg). In addition, these surgical results were reported to persist at long-term follow-ups of 1.5 and 2.5 years, respectively. Additionally, Hosking et al. shared their experience with 74 patients with native or post-operative PA stenosis with 110 balloon angioplasty procedures, confirming the observations of other authors that due to the potential for a beneficial result with low complication risk, angioplasty should be offered as initial therapy [11]. However, they also could not define any predictive factors for success, and often, the clinical impact was found to be transient. Therefore, most data have uniformly advocated a multimodality or hybrid approach with a combination of catheter-based and surgical interventions on a case-by-case basis [12]. In our opinion, surgery and transcatheter approaches are complementary to each other. We prefer the surgical option to be considered first in the majority of these cases unless the risks outweigh the benefits. In addition, follow-ups should be meticulously planned for surveillance for the recurrence of stenosis which could also be addressed on time with transcatheter techniques.
All patients in the current study have varying degrees of advanced liver disease. This represents a challenge in ALGS patients but is often the first red herring that points out their associated PA disease burden, as outlined in two patients in the current study who were initially referred for LTx evaluation. The difficulty in making the decision in these cases comes from the known risks of performing major surgery on a patient with advanced liver disease and, on the other hand, the challenges of transplanting the liver in a patient with suprasystemic RVSP also leading to elevated central venous pressure. Mainwaring et al. reported that patients with moderate or severe liver dysfunction had a four-fold higher relative risk of mortality compared to patients with mild or no liver dysfunction [3]. They suggested that liver dysfunction has an important influence on outcomes in children with ALGS undergoing CHD surgery. We demonstrated with careful pre-operative planning and a multidisciplinary team approach, that in those with ALGS and advanced liver disease, pulmonary arterial reconstruction can be performed safely; although it may require significant post-operative work, it will smoothen the path for LTx if needed later.
Luong et al. [2] supported the notion that PA disease alone is not a contraindication to LTx in patients with ALGS and ESRD. Given the prolonged surgical and bypass times required for PA reconstruction surgery with expected unfavorable hepatic sequelae, all patients with ALGS and significant liver disease should undergo evaluation by a transplantation hepatologist and LTx surgeon before PA reconstruction surgery. This study also showed that patients with severe liver disease can undergo complex PA repair and that those with repaired PA anomalies can undergo successful LTx.
In light of the complex nature and interactions between the various organ systems involved, our report concludes that a multidisciplinary team approach is certainly needed for ALGS patients. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to establish Alagille multidisciplinary programs to risk-stratify these patients and determine the ideal approach to their overall management.

5. Conclusions

Pulmonary arteries can be successfully rehabilitated surgically in the presence of complex branch stenosis with low morbidities or need for re-intervention. Patients with advanced liver disease can undergo successful complex pulmonary artery reconstruction, which can facilitate their future liver transplantation course. A multidisciplinary team approach is key to the successful management of Alagille patients due to its complex nature and frequent involvement in multisystem organs.

6. Limitations

The major limitation of this study is related to its small number; however, this is a relatively good number for the period of this study, considering the rarity of this disease and the rarity of having ALGS with advanced liver dysfunction. We also described early outcomes, but this was an important step for our program to highlight our approach and lessons learned with the goal of continuing to evolve our technique and highlight long-term data when available.

Author Contributions

F.K.: Data collection and analysis and writing the original draft; G.H.: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision and correction, and editing; J.C.S.: Supervision, correction and editing; S.M.S.: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision and correction, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Minnesota (Date of approval Oct 10, 2022; Study ID 00017269).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The corresponding author (S.M.S) is a consultant for Artivion. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.

References

  1. Martínez y Martínez, R. Allagile’s syndrome. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 1989, 46, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Luong, R.; Feinstein, J.A.; Ma, M.; Ebel, N.H.; Wise-Faberowski, L.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, L.F.; Yarlagadda, V.V.; Shek, J.; Hanley, F.L.; et al. Outcomes in Patients with Alagille Syndrome and Complex Pulmonary Artery Disease. J. Pediatr. 2021, 229, 86–94.e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mainwaring, R.D.; Felmly, L.M.; Collins, R.T.; Hanley, F.L. Impact of liver dysfunction on outcomes in children with Alagille syndrome undergoing congenital heart surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2022, 63, ezac553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Monge, M.C.; Mainwaring, R.D.; Sheikh, A.Y.; Punn, R.; Reddy, V.M.; Hanley, F.L. Surgical reconstruction of peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis in Williams and Alagille syndromes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013, 145, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lan, I.S.; Yang, W.; Feinstein, J.A.; Kreutzer, J.; Collins, R.T.; Ma, M.; Adamson, G.T.; Marsden, A.L. Virtual Transcatheter Interventions for Peripheral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Williams and Alagille Syndromes. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e023532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chang, C.H.; Bryce, C.L.; Shneider, B.L.; Yabes, J.G.; Ren, Y.; Zenarosa, G.L.; Tomko, H.; Donnell, D.M.; Squires, R.H.; Roberts, M.S. Accuracy of the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score in Estimating Pretransplant Mortality Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates. JAMA Pediatr. 2018, 172, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Said, S.M.; Marey, G. Bilateral branch pulmonary arterial reconstruction in the Alagille syndrome: The technique and its pitfalls. Multimed. Man. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2022, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martin, E.; Mainwaring, R.D.; Collins, R.T.; MacMillen, K.L.; Hanley, F.L. Surgical Repair of Peripheral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Patients Without Williams or Alagille Syndromes. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2020, 32, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Trivedi, K.R.; Benson, L.N. Interventional strategies in the management of peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2003, 16, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Geggel, R.L.; Gauvreau, K.; Lock, J.E. Balloon dilation angioplasty of peripheral pulmonary stenosis associated with Williams syndrome. Circulation 2001, 103, 2165–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hosking, M.C.; Thomaidis, C.; Hamilton, R.; Burrows, P.E.; Freedom, R.M.; Benson, L.N. Clinical impact of balloon angioplasty for branch pulmonary arterial stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1992, 69, 1467–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gandy, K.L.; Tweddell, J.S.; Pelech, A.N. How we approach peripheral pulmonary stenosis in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Card. Surg. Annu. 2009, 12, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A,B) Intra-operative photos showing (A) the thoroughly dissected lobar and segmental branches of the right and (B) left pulmonary arteries. This is an important step that has to be performed prior to heparinization and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass to avoid the potential for pulmonary hemorrhage from the parenchymal dissection.
Figure 1. (A,B) Intra-operative photos showing (A) the thoroughly dissected lobar and segmental branches of the right and (B) left pulmonary arteries. This is an important step that has to be performed prior to heparinization and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass to avoid the potential for pulmonary hemorrhage from the parenchymal dissection.
Jcdd 11 00232 g001
Figure 2. (AD) Intra-operative photos showing (A) the main pulmonary artery (PA) and both branches being transected which is an important step to facilitate the dissection and reconstruction. (B) Decellularized pulmonary homograft (H) patch augmentation of the right pulmonary artery is being performed, and the completed reconstruction is shown in (C). The procedure is then repeated on the left side, as shown in (D). LPA: left pulmonary artery; RPA: right pulmonary artery; PA: main pulmonary artery; RV: right ventricle; RA: right atrium, H: homograft.
Figure 2. (AD) Intra-operative photos showing (A) the main pulmonary artery (PA) and both branches being transected which is an important step to facilitate the dissection and reconstruction. (B) Decellularized pulmonary homograft (H) patch augmentation of the right pulmonary artery is being performed, and the completed reconstruction is shown in (C). The procedure is then repeated on the left side, as shown in (D). LPA: left pulmonary artery; RPA: right pulmonary artery; PA: main pulmonary artery; RV: right ventricle; RA: right atrium, H: homograft.
Jcdd 11 00232 g002
Figure 3. (AD) Intra-operative photos showing the final appearance of the augmented right (A) and left (B) branch pulmonary arteries. Pressure tracings showing (C) pre-cardiopulmonary bypass direct measurement of the right ventricular pressure (yellow tracing) which is suprasystemic, and (D) immediate post-operative right ventricular pressure which is less than 50% of the systemic pressure. All measurements were through a direct right ventricular pressure line that was placed intra-operatively. Ao: ascending aorta; PA: main pulmonary artery; RV: right ventricle; SVC: superior vena cava; RUL: right upper lobar branch; RLL: right lower lobar branch.
Figure 3. (AD) Intra-operative photos showing the final appearance of the augmented right (A) and left (B) branch pulmonary arteries. Pressure tracings showing (C) pre-cardiopulmonary bypass direct measurement of the right ventricular pressure (yellow tracing) which is suprasystemic, and (D) immediate post-operative right ventricular pressure which is less than 50% of the systemic pressure. All measurements were through a direct right ventricular pressure line that was placed intra-operatively. Ao: ascending aorta; PA: main pulmonary artery; RV: right ventricle; SVC: superior vena cava; RUL: right upper lobar branch; RLL: right lower lobar branch.
Jcdd 11 00232 g003
Figure 4. (AD) Pre-operative pulmonary angiography: anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views showing severe central branch pulmonary arteries stenoses and hypoplasia. The left and right main branches measured about 3 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively which were quite small for the patient. Multiple segmental stenoses of the lobar branches can be seen as well (black arrows). Post-operative computerized tomographic 3D reconstruction images (C,D) on the same patient performed 17 months after the pulmonary arterial rehabilitation showing widely patent and much larger central branch pulmonary arteries with minimal residual segmental pulmonary artery branch stenosis. RPA: Right pulmonary artery, LPA: Left pulmonary artery.
Figure 4. (AD) Pre-operative pulmonary angiography: anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views showing severe central branch pulmonary arteries stenoses and hypoplasia. The left and right main branches measured about 3 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively which were quite small for the patient. Multiple segmental stenoses of the lobar branches can be seen as well (black arrows). Post-operative computerized tomographic 3D reconstruction images (C,D) on the same patient performed 17 months after the pulmonary arterial rehabilitation showing widely patent and much larger central branch pulmonary arteries with minimal residual segmental pulmonary artery branch stenosis. RPA: Right pulmonary artery, LPA: Left pulmonary artery.
Jcdd 11 00232 g004
Table 1. Patients’ baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Patients’ baseline characteristics.
CharacteristicsPatients
(n = 6)
Female sex 4
Median age at the time of cardiac surgery (months)20.5 (7–18)
Median weight at the time of cardiac surgery (kg)9 (4.9–10)
Positive for JAG 1 gene deletion 5 *
Organ System Involvement
Gastro-intestinal involvement 6
Median PELD score 25.6 (6.7–22.3)
ESLD requiring liver transplantation ¥3
Renal diagnosisESRD requiring renal transplantation 3
1
Hematological diagnosis 2
Complex coagulopathy
Axial skeletal involvement 2
Butterfly vertebrae1
Long bone fractures1
Ophthalmologic involvement 3
Posterior embryotoxon2
Retinal dystrophy1
JAG 1, Jagged Canonical Notch Ligand 1; ESLD, end-stage liver disease; PELD, pediatric end-stage liver disease score; ESRD, end-stage renal disease. * One family opted out of genetic testing but has a phenotypic diagnosis of ALGS. ¥ Developed ESLD during the follow-up. Developed ESRD during the follow-up. Global coagulation factor deficits, thrombocytopenia likely from hypersplenia, platelet dysfunction.
Table 2. Associated cardiovascular anomalies and the performed surgical procedures.
Table 2. Associated cardiovascular anomalies and the performed surgical procedures.
Cardiac DiagnosisPatients
(n = 6)
Branch pulmonary artery stenosis6 *
Central pulmonary artery stenosis2
Criss-cross branch pulmonary arteries3
Supravalvar pulmonary artery stenosis2
Pulmonary valve stenosis1
TOF1
Bicuspid pulmonary valve1
ASD4
PDA4
Bicuspid aortic valve1
Coarctation of the aorta1
Surgical Interventions
Extensive bilateral branch pulmonary patch arterioplasty6
TOF repair1
Open pulmonary valvotomy1
Tricuspid valve repair1
Repair of supravalvular PA stenosis2
ASD closure4
PDA ligation4
TOF, tetralogy of Fallot; PA, pulmonary artery; ASD, atrial septal defect; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus. * Most patients had a combination of central and peripheral lobar and segmental PAS.
Table 3. Immediate hemodynamic and post-surgical outcomes.
Table 3. Immediate hemodynamic and post-surgical outcomes.
HemodynamicsPatients (n = 6)
RVSP £ prior to surgery
  • Suprasystemic
2
  • Systemic
3
  • >50% systemic
1
RVSP £ immediate post-op
  • Suprasystemic
0
  • Systemic
0
  • 50–70% systemic
4
  • <50% systemic
2
Surgical Details
Median cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes)459 (192–409)
Median number of patches for PA plasty5 (2–7)
Post-op complications
  • Pericardial effusion requiring catheter drainage
1
  • Tamponade requiring early re-operation **
1
  • Wound infection and superficial dehiscence
2
Post-op course
  • Need for ECMO
0
  • Median length of hospital stay (days)
16.5(7–168 *)
RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; ECMO, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation; PA; pulmonary artery. £ Measured with direct right ventricular pressure line placed during surgery except for one patient with TOF. TOF by definition has systemic RVSP, and post-surgical RVSP was measured via trans-esophageal echo. * One patient underwent liver transplantation during the same admission. ** This was the patient who required early liver transplantation and had significant coagulopathy in the peri-operative period.
Table 4. Late follow-up hemodynamic and post-surgical outcomes.
Table 4. Late follow-up hemodynamic and post-surgical outcomes.
CharacteristicsPatients
(n = 6)
RVSP by echo/cardiac catheterization on the last follow-up visit
Suprasystemic/Systemic
75–95% systemic
<50% systemic

0
0
6
Need for percutaneous intervention after surgery 1
Liver transplantation
Median duration after PPAS repair, months
3
15 (1–18)
Kidney transplantation
Duration after PPAS repair, months
1
17
Follow-up status overall
Deceased
Alive
Prescribed PH medication

0
6
0
RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; PPAS: peripheral branch pulmonary artery stenosis; PH: pulmonary hypertension. Thirteen months after the cardiac repair, with balloon dilation of the left pulmonary artery due to restenosis and segmental branches of the left lower lobe due to development of new stenoses.
Table 5. Details of the genetic mutations * in the current cohort **.
Table 5. Details of the genetic mutations * in the current cohort **.
Patient 1 Heterozygous frameshift mutation in JAG1:NM_000214.2; c.1205dup (p.Gln403ThrfsX13)
Patient 2 Monoallelic mutation in JAG1 variant c3063_3034dupAC
Patient 3Heterozygous frameshift mutation in JAG1: NM_000214.3; c.2323del p. (Glu775Argfs*45)
Patient 4Monoallelic mutation in JAG1
Patient 5Copy number LOSS in 20p12.2 (2.0 Mb)
* Genetic testing with either chromosomal microarray or next-generation sequencing. ** One family opted out of genetic testing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karim, F.; Hiremath, G.; Samayoa, J.C.; Said, S.M. Complex Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation in Children with Alagille Syndrome: An Early Single-Center Experience of a Successful Collaborative Work. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11, 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080232

AMA Style

Karim F, Hiremath G, Samayoa JC, Said SM. Complex Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation in Children with Alagille Syndrome: An Early Single-Center Experience of a Successful Collaborative Work. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2024; 11(8):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karim, Farida, Gurumurthy Hiremath, Juan Carlos Samayoa, and Sameh M. Said. 2024. "Complex Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation in Children with Alagille Syndrome: An Early Single-Center Experience of a Successful Collaborative Work" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 11, no. 8: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080232

APA Style

Karim, F., Hiremath, G., Samayoa, J. C., & Said, S. M. (2024). Complex Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation in Children with Alagille Syndrome: An Early Single-Center Experience of a Successful Collaborative Work. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11(8), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop