Next Article in Journal
Prevalence and Risk Factors Predicting Onychomycosis in Patients with and Without Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Invasive Aspergillosis with Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis Following High-Dose Corticosteroid Therapy: A Challenging Case of Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mycosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation, Identification, and Analyzing the Biological Characteristics of Pathogens Causing Stem Rot of Lanzhou Onion During Postharvest Storage and Studying the Influence of Pathogen Infection on the Active Components of Lanzhou Onion

1
College of Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(11), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110789
Submission received: 12 September 2024 / Revised: 26 October 2024 / Accepted: 9 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control of Postharvest Fungal Diseases, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
This study was conducted in order to explore the pathogens that cause stem rot of fresh onions during postharvest storage, identify the incidence of stem rot, investigate the influence of pathogen infection on the active components of onion, and provide a theoretical basis for disease control during the postharvest storage of fresh onions. The pathogens were isolated and purified from the junction between the rotten and healthy tissues of onion stem rot that occurred naturally during storage at room temperature by tissue separation; then, the pathogens were identified by morphological and molecular biological techniques, the biological characteristics of the pathogens were analyzed, and finally, the influence of pathogen infection on the active ingredients of onion was studied. The results suggested that the main pathogens causing stem rot of fresh onions during postharvest storage were Talaromyces pinophilus, Trichoderma simmonsii, and Talaromyces minioluteus. The optimum colony growth conditions for T. pinophilus were as follows: a temperature of 30 °C, a pH of 7, light for 24 h, maltose as a carbon source, and peptone as a nitrogen source; the lethal temperature was 65 °C for 15 min. For T. simmonsii, the lethal temperature was 60 °C for 15 min, and the optimum sporulation conditions were a temperature of 25 °C, a pH of 5–7, light for 24 h, a carbon source of sucrose, and a nitrogen source of yeast powder. For T. minioluteus, the lethal condition was 65 °C for 15 min; the optimum colony growth conditions were a temperature of 25 °C, a pH of 8–9, 24 h of darkness, a carbon source of maltose, and a nitrogen source of peptone. The relative content of sulfur compounds, as the active components of onions, was much lower in the infected onions than in the healthy onions due to infection by the pathogens T. pinophilus, T.simmonsii, and T.minioluteus. This study will provide a theoretical basis for further effective control of the occurrence of postharvest stem rot diseases of onions.

1. Introduction

The onion (Allium cepa), a biennial herb of the Liliaceae family, is not only rich in nutrients but also possesses significant medicinal values, such as anti-cancer and antioxidant properties, earning the title “queen of vegetables” [1,2]. Onion is the second most widely grown vegetable globally, currently cultivated in over 170 countries [3]. China is among the top four producers of onions, along with India, the United States, and Japan. Onions are extensively cultivated across both the northern and southern regions of China, and the cultivation area continues to expand, making it one of the main vegetables in the country.
However, onions are often susceptible to infection by pathogenic fungi, leading to fungal diseases during both the field growth and storage stages. For instance, Fusarium oxysporum causes stem base rot, which can occur during both the growth and harvest stages of onions [4]. Alternaria allium, responsible for onion purple spot, primarily affects the leaves and pedicel during the growth stage and can occasionally damage the onion bulbs as well [5,6]. Onion downy mildew, caused by Peronospora destructor, predominantly occurs during the growth stage, targeting the onion leaves [7,8]. Most research on these diseases has focused on the growth stage of onions. However, onion stem rot is more prevalent and severe during the postharvest storage stage [9], which not only diminishes the market value of onions but also significantly reduces their storage and shelf life. The pathogens causing stem rot during postharvest storage vary significantly across different regions.
In addition, the infection of pathogenic microorganisms can impact the flavor and active component contents of host plants [10]. It has been reported that the main active components of onion bulbs are sulfides [11], including trisulfide and disulfide compounds [12,13]. Disulfide propane, in particular, has the highest sulfur content and is a key contributor to the distinctive flavor of onions [14]. The sulfides in onions have notable biological functions, such as lowering blood lipids, reducing blood glucose levels, and affecting hemolytic fiber. However, it has not been yet reported whether the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms influences the metabolism of sulfides in onion bulb tissue, potentially leading to a reduction in sulfide accumulation.
In this study, onion bulbs exhibiting typical symptoms of stem rot disease were collected from a farmers’ market in Anning District, Lanzhou, Gansu Province. Pathogens were isolated and purified from the tissue at the boundary between the diseased and healthy areas. The pathogens were identified using morphological and molecular biological techniques, and their pathogenicity was verified according to Koch’s postulates. Subsequently, the biological characteristics of the identified pathogens were analyzed, and the active ingredients of onions infected by the three pathogens were examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Onion bulb tissues displaying typical stem rot symptoms were collected from a farmers’ market in Anning District, Lanzhou City, during 2023–2024. The samples were placed into clean, sealed bags and transported back to the Chemical Biology Laboratory at the College of Science, Gansu Agricultural University, within 24 h. They were stored at room temperature (25 °C, 30% RH). Healthy onion bulb tissues, free of visible pests and diseases, were used as controls for the pathogenicity verification of the samples.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Isolation and Purification of Isolates

Following the method of Xi [15], the bulb tissues with obvious disease symptoms were selected. Fragments (4 mm × 4 mm) were taken from the edge of diseased and healthy tissues and then disinfected in a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, followed by rinsing three times with sterile distilled water to remove any sodium hypochlorite residues. The fragments were then air-dried at room temperature and inoculated onto PDA medium. The PDA plates with the 4 mm × 4 mm fragments were incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 7 days. Colonies growing with different morphologies were separated by streak on new PDA medium, and this was repeated 4–5 times until a single colony was obtained. The experiment was repeated three times; one repeat included 5 colony cultures.

2.2.2. Morphological Identification of Isolates

A 2 μL spore suspension of the isolated and purified pathogens was inoculated onto PDA medium and incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Spore morphology was examined using a scanning electron microscope (ULTRAPLUS, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany), and spores were cultured on PDA medium with an improved glucose content. The morphology of the spore pedicles was observed under an optical microscope (CX21FS1C, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). A spore suspension (1 × 106 spores/mL) was prepared, inoculated onto PDA medium, and cultured using the solid-insert method. Pathogens were identified based on their morphological characteristics by referring to the Fungal Identification Manual for Talaromyces spp. [16] and Trichoderma spp. [17].

2.2.3. Molecular Biological Identification of Isolate

Mycelial DNA was extracted following the method described by Lv [18]. Fungal mycelium was collected from PDA medium and ground into a powder in the presence of liquid nitrogen. The powdered mycelium was then lyzed in platelet lysate, and a phenol–chloroform mixture was added. The mixture was thoroughly mixed and centrifuged, and the aqueous phase was transferred and mixed with 1 mL of ethanol solution. After thorough mixing and a second centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was washed with ethanol solution, centrifuged again, and the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was dissolved in 50–100 µL of an ethanol solution until fully dissolved. Finally, 2–5 µL of the DNA solution was used for electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel for separation.
Based on the electrophoretic map, an appropriate amount of DNA solution was used as a template for subsequent PCR amplification. The PCR reaction system had a total volume of 50 μL, comprising 1 μL each of upstream and downstream primers, 2 μL of template DNA, and 46–47 μL of 1 × Taq PCR Mix. The primers used (ITS, Bt, RBP2, and CaM) and their sequences are listed in Table 1. Using the extracted isolate DNA as a template, the primers were designed according to the method of Xi [15]. The PCR amplification procedure was as follows: initial pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; denaturation at 94 °C for 10 s, annealing at 53 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, repeated for 35 cycles; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified product was then separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.
The amplified fragments were sequenced by Beijing Bomad Biological Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The sequencing results were analyzed using NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 13 April 2024), and homologous analysis was performed. MEGA 7.0 software was used to construct phylogenetic tree by adjacent method. The results of molecular biological identification and morphological identification were combined to determine the pathogen species.

2.2.4. Pathogenicity Testing of Isolates

Onion bulb tissues without visible signs of diseases or pests were collected and disinfected with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min, followed by rinsing three times with sterile water to remove any sodium hypochlorite residues. Inoculation holes (1 mm in diameter and 3 mm deep) were made in the onion bulbs using a sterilized pipette tip. Spore suspensions (1 × 106 CFU/mL) of the three isolated and purified pathogens were prepared, and 10 μL of each spore suspension was separately injected into the onion bulbs, with sterile water serving as control. After air drying, the inoculated onion bulbs were incubated in the dark at 20 °C and 50% RH. Samples were taken every 7 days to calculate the disease incidence and disease index. The disease incidence and disease index were calculated as follows:
Disease index = ∑ (number of disease grade × representative value of each disease grade)/(total number of plants × representative value of highest disease grade) × 100%
Disease incidence = number of diseased plants/total number of plants × 100%
Four groups of treatments were inoculated with the three major pathogenic strains, and the control group was kept uninfected, with each treatment repeated three times (each repeat consisted of 10 pieces of healthy onion). In the course of our experimental protocol, one variant entailed the utilization of ten onions, each of which was required to undergo a triplicate parallel processing. Across four separate treatments, this cumulatively resulted in the processing of a total of 120 (10 × 3 × 4 = 120) samples. After 21 days of incubation, isolates were collected and purified from the junction between the rotten and healthy tissues and were compared with the originally inoculated pathogens. Isolates that conformed to Koch’s postulates [15] were selected for further study. The disease severity was graded on a scale of 0 to 4, as described in Table 2.

2.2.5. Effects of Temperature, Light, pH, Carbon and Nitrogen Sources and Different Humidity Conditions on the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

A 2 μL spore suspension was inoculated at the center of PDA medium and incubated in the dark at temperatures of 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C for 7 days. The colony morphology was observed, and the colony diameter was measured using the cross method. The identified pathogens were replicated three times in each temperature condition. Spore production was measured and calculated using a hemocytometer (blood cell counting plate) method. Plate with the identified pathogen was replicated three times to determine fungal sporulation.
A 2 μL spore suspension with a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL was inoculated at the center of PDA medium under three different conditions: 12 h of light alternating with 12 h of darkness, 24 h of continuous darkness, and 24 h of continuous light for 7 days. The colonies were observed, and their colony diameters were measured using the cross method. Spore production was determined using the hemocytometer method. Plate with the identified pathogen was replicated three times to determine fungal sporulation.
The pH of the PDA medium was adjusted using HCl and NaOH solutions to create pH levels of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. A 2 μL spore suspension with a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL was inoculated at the center of each PDA plate. Colony diameters were measured using the cross method, and spore production was determined using a hemocytometer. The identified pathogens were replicated three times in each pH level.
Czapek medium was prepared by dissolving 3 g NaNO3, 1 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g KCl, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 30 g sucrose, and 20 g agar in 1000 mL of sterile water. This medium was used to investigate the sources of carbon and nitrogen. The nitrogen source was maintained as NaNO3, while sucrose was replaced with equivalent carbon masses of glucose (31.58 g), maltose (30 g), cyclodextrin (28.42 g), mannitol (31.93 g), or fructose (31.58 g) as the carbon source. For nitrogen sources, ammonium sulfate (2.33 g), yeast extract powder (6.16 g), peptone (0.22 g), glycine (2.65 g), and urea (1.06 g) were used in place of sodium nitrate. Czapek medium served as the blank control.
The 2 μL spore suspensions of the three pathogens were separately cultured at a constant temperature for 7 days in Czapek medium with different carbon sources. Colony growth was observed, and colony diameters were measured using the cross method. Spore production was measured using a hemocytometer. Plate with the identified pathogen was replicated three times to determine fungal sporulation.
Colonies were cultured in Petri dishes using the slide method [24]. The relative humidity was adjusted to 23 ± 2.0%, 33 ± 2.0%, 43 ± 2.0%, 59 ± 2.0%, 65 ± 2.0%, 75 ± 2.0%, 84 ± 2.0%, and 93 ± 2.0% using saturated solutions of CH3COOK, MgCl2, K2CO3, NaBr, CoCl2, KNO3, KCl, and NaCl, respectively. Spore production and spore germination rates were calculated after 12 h of incubation at different relative humidity levels under dark, constant temperature conditions. Spore germination under these conditions was observed using an optical microscope. Plate with the identified pathogen was replicated three times to determine fungal sporulation.

2.2.6. Analysis of Onion Active Components

Sample Preparation

Healthy onion bulbs without visible mechanical damage or pests were selected as the control group, while onion bulbs inoculated with the three pathogens were designated as the treatment groups (WRX-1, WRX-2, and WRX-3). For the treatment groups, 30 g of tissue was collected from the rotten areas, and for the control group, 30 g of tissue was collected from healthy areas. The samples were then quickly ground into powder using liquid nitrogen and stored at −4 °C for later use.
Following the method of Fernandes [25], 10 g of sample powder was accurately weighed and transferred into a headspace vial. Then, 5 mL of saturated NaCl solution was added, and the mixture was heated and stirred at 1600 r/min for 20 min to equilibrate the volatile substances in the vial. After equilibration, the pre-conditioned extraction fiber was inserted into the headspace vial, the fiber head was extended, and volatiles were absorbed at a specified temperature for a set duration. The fiber head was then retracted, and the extraction head was quickly inserted into the gas chromatograph inlet. The fiber head was extended and analyzed at 250 °C for a specified time. Data collection by the instrument commenced as the fiber head was inserted. The fiber used for extraction was a 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber, and the extraction was performed at 60 °C for 60 min. The experiment was repeated three times.

GC–MS Condition

GC conditions: The column is a capillary column of HP-INNOWAX model, and the specification is 60 m × 0.250 mm × 0.5 μm. The sample inlet temperature of the gas chromatograph is 250 °C. The programmed temperature condition is as follows: the initial temperature is 60 °C, hold for 1 min; the temperature is raised to 180 at the rate of 2 °C/min; when the temperature rises to 230 °C, hold for 5 min. The carrier gas is high-purity helium (purity ≥ 99.999%); column flow rate is 0.98 mL/min; and shitter ratio is 20:1.
MS condition: electron bombardment ion source; electron energy, 70 eV; transmission line temperature, 230 °C; ion source temperature, 230 °C; scanning mode: Full Scan; ion mass scanning range m/z, 25~500 u.

2.2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data (mean and standard deviation) were calculated using Excel 2019; SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze the significance of differences (p < 0.05), and all data in this study were created using Origin 2020 (Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Symptoms of Onion Stem Rot During Postharvest Storage Stage

The onion bulbs with typical stem rot symptoms were collected from the farmer’s market in Anning District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province of China; the disease symptoms are clearly visible (Figure 1). The onion surface tissue is scattered with gray–green spots and flocculent mold spores and had a certain pungent odor. The tissue under the mold layer is wrinkled, soft, light in color, and accompanied by water stains.

3.2. Identification of the Pathogen Causing Onion Stem Rot During Storage

3.2.1. Morphological Identification

Three strains were isolated and purified from the tissues showing typical symptoms of stem rot in fresh onions. The colony morphology, spore morphology, and spore stalk morphology were observed. The WRX-1 colony is grayish green on the front side of the PDA medium (Figure 2A) and orange on the back side (Figure 2B), with radial folds and fluffy texture. The conidia are erect with green branches, and the top branches are broomlike (Figure 2G). The conidia are loosely clustered on the pedospora. The achromatic monospore is round or oblate (Figure 2J). The surface of the monospores has particles (2–3.5) μm × (100–160) μm in size. Referring to the fungal identification manual [16], the isolate of WRX-1 was preliminarily identified as Talaromyces pinophilus (Figure 2).
The WRX-2 colonies on the PDA medium are gray–green on the front side (Figure 2C) and yellow on the back side (Figure 2D). The conidia are erect, unbranched, green, with clamp-like tips (Figure 2H). The conidia are compactly clustered on the pedospora. The achromospora are round (Figure 2K); the surface particles are not smooth, and their size is (2~3.5) μm × (100~160) μm. Based on the fungal identification manual [17], the isolate of WRX-2 was preliminarily identified as Trichoderma simmonsii (Figure 2).
The WRX-3 colony appears grey–green on the front of the PDA medium (Figure 2E) and is surrounded by a white fuzz. The back is orange–yellow (Figure 2F). The colonies appear as scattered spheroids. The spore peduncle is curved, branching, and green; the apex branch is hand-shaped (Figure 2I). The conidia are clustered tightly on the spore stem. The achromatic monospore is spherical with a concave center (Figure 2I). The surface is corrugated. The size of the conidia is (2~3.5) μm × (100~160) μm. Combining with the fungal identification manual [16], the isolate of WRX-3 was preliminarily identified as Talaromyces minioluteus (Figure 2).

3.2.2. Molecular Biological Identification

The three strains were amplified by PCR using the ITS, BT, CaM, and RPB2 primers. The amplification products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The resulting gel electrophoresis diagram is shown in Figure 3. The sequence sizes of the three strains amplified by the ITS primers were 574 bp (WRX-1), 611 bp (WRX-2), and 599 bp (WRX-3). The sequence sizes of the three strains amplified by the BT primers were 464 bp (WRX-1), 362 bp (WRX-2), and 473 bp (WRX-3). The sequence sizes of the three strains amplified by the RPB2 primer were 840 bp (WRX-1), 537 bp (WRX-2), and 841 bp (WRX-3). Additionally, the sequence sizes of the two pathogens amplified by the CaM primer were 667 bp (WRX-2) and 655 bp (WRX-3).
The amplified sequences were sequenced and blasted at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 26 December 2023)). The sequences with high homology (greater than 95.00%) with isolated strains were selected. The MEGA7.0.26 (7170509-x86_64) software was used to construct ITS, Bt, RPB2, and CMD phylogenetic trees based on the adjacency sequence method (Figure 4).
The PCR amplification and phylogenetic tree analysis using ITS, BT, CMD, and RPB2 with 24 primers showed consistent results (Figure 4). WRX-1 and T. pinophilus (MH793130.1) were located in a branch on the phylogenetic tree with 100% homology. WRX-2 with T. simmonsi is (CP075867.1:3580597-3581080, CP075867.1:2245416-2245774) in the phylogenetic tree in a branch, with homology of 94%. WRX-3 shares a branch with T. minioluteus (MN311444.1:136-733) on the phylogenetic tree with 100% homology. However, WRX-3 is not detected for CMD. Based on the above analysis and morphological identification, WRX-1 was identified as T. pinophilus, WRX-2 as T. simmonsi, and WRX-3 as T. minioluteus.

3.3. Verification of the Pathogenicity of the Three Isolates

The results of the pathogenic analyses of these three isolates showed that the disease index of onions on the 16th day of storage was almost 100.00% after inoculation with those three pathogenic strains. After 16 days of storage, the incidences of WRX-1, WRX-2, and WRX-3 were 91.6%, 50.0%, and 100.00%, respectively (Figure 5). The incidence of WRX-3 was the highest, followed by WRX-1. Therefore, WRX-1 and WRX-3 are considered to be the main strains causing onion postharvest disease during storage.

3.4. Effects of Environmental Conditions on the Sporulation of Pathogens

3.4.1. Temperature Significantly Affected the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

The optimum sporulation temperature for all three fungi was 25 °C. The fungi did not grow when the temperature was below 15 °C or above 40 °C. At 35 °C, the sporulation yield of the three fungi decreased significantly: T. pinophilus by 0.91 × 10⁷ CFU/mL, T. simmonsii by 0.77 × 10⁷ CFU/mL, and T. minioluteus by 0.77 × 10⁷ CFU/mL. When the temperature was 15 °C, the sporulation yield of T. pinophilus was only 1.83 × 10⁷ CFU/mL (Table 3).

3.4.2. pH Significantly Affected the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

In the pH range of 7~8, all three strains could grow well. T. minioluteus grows well in a wide pH range and grows best under pH 8–9. Under pH 7, the spore production of T. pinophilus was 2.33 × 107; compared to pH 6, it rose by 1.76 × 107, but the spore production of T. simmonsii decreased by 0.6 × 107 with the same change in pH. T. pinophilus and T. simmonsii are better suited to grow in slightly acidic environments but can also grow under alkaline conditions (Table 3).

3.4.3. Light Significantly Affected the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

Light conditions had a significant effect on the growth of the three fungi. T. pinophilus (1.65 × 107) and T. simmonsii (4.23 × 108) had the largest sporulation under 24 h light conditions, followed by light/darkness alternations for 12 h, while T. minioluteus (9.30 × 107) had the highest sporulation under 24 h total darkness conditions (Table 3).

3.4.4. Carbon Source Significantly Affected the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

In the medium with six different carbon sources, all three strains could grow normally. T. pinophilus (2.35 × 107) had the highest sporulation when maltose was the carbon source. T. simmonsii (10.59 × 108) and T. minioluteus (9.23 × 107) had the highest sporulation when sucrose was the carbon source (Table 3).

3.4.5. Nitrogen Source Significantly Affected the Growth and Sporulation of Pathogens

The three strains grew on the five different nitrogen source media. For T. pinophilus, when peptone was used as the nitrogen source, the sporulation of pathogens was 2.87 × 107; when urea was used as the nitrogen source, the sporulation of pathogens was 0. Therefore, peptone is the best nitrogen source for T. pinophilus. The highest sporulation rate was achieved by T. simmonsii (1.19 × 108) in the medium with yeast extract powder as the nitrogen source (Table 3).

3.4.6. Determination of Spore Germination of Pathogens Under Different Humidity Conditions

The spore germination of the three fungi was greatly affected by relative humidity. When the relative humidity was lower than 23%, the spores did not germinate; when the humidity was lower than 43%, the spore germination rate was lower than 50%. The spore germination rate of T. pinophilus was higher than 70% when the relative humidity was higher than 85%. The spore germination rate of T. simmonsii was higher than 70% when the relative humidity was higher than 55%. The spore germination rate of T. minioluteus was higher than 70% when the relative humidity was higher than 65% (Figure 6).

3.5. Analysis of Onion Active Ingredients

The total ion chromatograms of volatile components from uninfected onions (control) and onions infected by WRX-1, WRX-2, and WRX-3 were obtained by analyzing the active components of the onions. The compounds were identified using the NIST 17 spectral library. The relative contents of each active substance were determined by peak area normalization. The types and relative contents of the volatile components in the onion bulbs from both the control and treatment groups are summarized in Table 4.
In the control group, 46 main volatile compounds were detected, and 40 volatile components were identified; they are primarily disulfides, such as 1-1-propenylthionyl, dipropyl trisulfide, isopropyl disulfide, and triethylsilane. In the stem rot tissues of onion scales infected with WRX-1, 44 main volatile compounds were detected, and 19 volatile components were identified, mainly disulfides, including isopropyl disulfide, (1E)-1-propenyl propyl, 2-undecanone, 2,4-octanedione, 3(2H)-furanone-2-hexyl-5-methyl, and 2-tridecanone. In the stem rot tissues of onion scales infected with WRX-2, 40 main volatile compounds were detected, with 36 volatile components identified. These were primarily disulfides, such as isopropyl disulfide, (1E)-1-propenyl propyl, 2-undecanone, 2,4-octanedione, 3(2H)-furanone-2-hexyl-5-methyl, and 2-tridecanone. In the stem rot tissues of onion scales infected with WRX-3, 41 main volatile compounds were detected, and 39 volatile components were identified; these were also primarily disulfides, including isopropyl disulfide, (1E)-1-propenyl propyl, 2-undecanone, 2,4-octanedione, 3(2H)-furanone-2-hexyl-5-methyl, and 2-tridecanone. On comparing the volatile components of uninfected onions with those infected by the three pathogens, it can be seen that 16 kinds of sulfur compounds, 4 kinds of aldehydes, and 2 kinds of alcohols were identified in uninfected onions; 19 kinds of sulfur compounds and 1 kind of alcohol were identified in onions infected with WRX-1; 16 kinds of sulfur compounds, 1 kind of aldehyde, and 1 kind of alcohol were identified in onions infected with WRX-2; and 16 kinds of sulfur compounds were identified in onions infected with WRX-3.
Although the types of sulfur-containing compounds in uninfected onions did not significantly change compared to the infected onion tissues, the relative content of these compounds was notably higher in uninfected onions. For instance, the relative content of 1-1-allyl thiopropyl disulfide in uninfected onions was 7.66%, whereas in onion bulb tissues infected with WRX-1, it was only 1.01%. Similarly, the relative content of triethylsilane in uninfected onions was 9.28%, but in onion bulb tissue infected with WRX-2, it was just 0.28%. In uninfected onion tissues, the contents of isopropyl disulfide, dipropyl triethioether, and (1E)-1-allyl propyl were 19.93%, 16.69%, and 11.57%, respectively; however, these compounds were not detected in the infected onion tissues.
Additionally, isopropyl disulfide, (1E)-1-propenyl propyl, 2-undecanone, 2,4-octanedione, 3(2H)-furanone-2-hexyl-5-methyl, and 2-tridecanone were detected in onions infected by all three pathogens, with no significant differences in their content among the treatments. These findings suggest that pathogen infection leads to significant changes in the types and levels of volatile compounds in onions. More secondary metabolites were produced in the onion tissues infected by the three pathogens, which affected the overall volatile components and active substances of the onions (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

In this study, the pathogens causing stem rot in onions were isolated, purified, and identified as T. pinophilus, T. simmonsii, and T. minioluteus.
T. pinophilus is a fungus from the genera Cyanobacteria and Penicillium, known for producing several essential bioactive metabolites, including terpenes, alkaloids, polyketides, lactones, and furan alcohols [26,27,28]. It has been widely used as an effective cellulose and waste depressant. Additionally, turquoise cyanobacteria have been shown to promote plant development in Waito-C rice and chickpea [29,30]. T. pinophilus also exhibits antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani [31,32]. However, studies on T. pinophilus in China are very limited. In this study, T. pinophilus was isolated and purified from onion tissues exhibiting typical stem rot symptoms.
As reported by Zhang [33], when the strain was incubated on a PDA plate at 28 °C, the colony initially appeared as white filaments, gradually turning yellow–green, and eventually producing green or dark green spores. Talaromyces funiculosus is commonly found in corn but can occasionally cause spoilage in other food products [34]. Zhang’s study [33] demonstrated that crude glucanase activity was purified from T. pinophilus through ammonium sulfate fractionation and Sepharose 6B chromatography, resulting in a 6.69 times higher recovery rate with an overall yield of 11.27%. The enzyme was identified as endoglucanase, with a molecular weight of 58 kDa, which is lower than most glucanases, and an optimal temperature and pH of 45 °C and 6.0, respectively. The enzyme was stable over a pH range of 3.0 to 10.0 and exhibited excellent thermal stability.
In recent years, research on T. simmonsii has primarily focused on its role in the biological control of plant diseases, with fewer reports on T. simmonsii as a pathogen. Yao confirmed through Koch’s postulates that Trichoderma spp. are the pathogens responsible for causing ear rot in maize [35]. Zhang et al. [36] isolated the fungus from soil and identified it based on rDNA-ITS fragments. Our observations showed that T. simmonsii appears gray–green with a yellow underside and has a velvet texture with a radial pattern underneath, which is consistent with the report by Qin [37]. Qin noted that the center of the colony was white, surrounded by a distinct circle and green areas around the central part. The aerial mycelium is distinctly radial, abundant, dense, and ranges from flocculent to cotton-like. It diffuses a light yellow pigment and has a slightly fruity odor.
T. minioluteus is one of the most important species of Talaromyces and is widely distributed worldwide. Vinas et al. isolated and purified this strain from rotten apple fruit. The fungus appears grayish-green in color, surrounded by a white fuzz, with an orange reverse side. The colonies are scattered and spherical, with spore peduncles that are curved and branched, green, and apically branched like a hand. The conidia are compact, colorless, mononuclear, spherical, concave in the middle, with a wrinkled surface, measuring (2–3.5) μm × (100–160) μm, and are produced in large numbers. Stefan Stoic [38] described the colony as brown, round, and slightly concave, with white to yellow mycelium and, in some cases, sparse to dense dark green spores on the surface of the sample. These observations suggest that the same strain isolated from different host plants can exhibit considerable variations in morphological characteristics.
In addition, different levels of relative humidity significantly impacted the spore germination of the three strains in this study. Higher relative humidity correlated with higher spore germination rates. Onions are primarily cultivated in Jiayuguan County, Gansu Province, China, where the climate features long sunshine hours, large temperature differences between day and night, and a typical Gobi Desert environment, which is favorable for onion growth. However, the storage environment differs significantly; when the humidity and temperature in storage are suitable for pathogen growth and development, postharvest diseases will worsen and cause deterioration. Consequently, the three pathogen strains are commonly employed as biocontrol agents. However, the present investigation has discerned that these bacteria are capable of inducing diseases following inoculation into onion tissues. This phenomenon may be attributed to the post-inoculation placement of the onion tissues in a sealed environment, maintained under specific temperature and humidity conditions, thereby precipitating onion pathology. Furthermore, this research represents the inaugural instance of isolating and purifying the pathogens from onion tissues. Therefore, to prevent onion stem rot, the storage environment should maintain low humidity and temperature, which will suppress the germination and growth of pathogenic fungi, thereby controlling postharvest disease [39].
The different compositions and contents of volatile components contribute to the distinct spicy flavor of onions. Sulfur-containing compounds are the main volatile components in fresh onions and are key to their characteristic flavor and active substances [40]. These sulfur-containing compounds include mono-sulfides, disulfides, trisulfides, and other related substances. They are responsible for the distinctive pungent aroma of onions [41] and possess biological activities such as lowering blood lipids, reducing blood sugar levels, and affecting hemolytic fibers.
The results of this study showed significant changes in the volatile components and their contents in onion tissues infected by T. pinophilus, T. simmonsii, and T. minioluteus. Notably, the content of sulfur compounds decreased significantly, while the levels of other aldehydes and alcohols increased. Vikram [42] reported that Penicillium expansum infection altered the types and contents of volatile compounds in McIntosh, Cortland, and Empire apples. Similarly, Encinas-Basurto et al. observed higher proportions of aliphatics (28.3%) and alkenes (4.9%) in Botrytis cinerea-inoculated apples, while Monilinia-inoculated apples contained higher proportions of esters (65.7%) and alcohols (7.8%). In the non-wounded control treatment, aromatics (10.7%) and heterocyclic compounds (9.9%) were found in normalized abundances higher than in other treatments. Encinas-Basurto et al. [43] also identified significant changes in the types and contents of volatile compounds in tomato tissues infected by Alternaria alternata, noting that more volatile metabolites (VMs) were released from inoculated fruits compared to control fruits. VMs such as dimethyl disulfide, 3-methyl-2-butenal, 2-methyl-1-butanol acetate, 1-butanol, 1-nitrobutane, 2-methyl-1-butenol, 4-methyl-1-pentanol, and 1-hexanol were exclusively detected in inoculated fruits. These findings indicate that pathogenic fungal infections not only lead to the deterioration of fruits and vegetables but also result in the accumulation of secondary metabolites in the affected tissues, significantly impacting the flavor, quality, and active ingredients of these produce items.

5. Conclusions

The pathogens causing onion stem rot during postharvest storage were identified as Talaromyces pinophilus, Trichoderma simmonsii, and Talaromyces minioluteus. For T. pinophilus, a temperature of 65 °C for 15 min was lethal, with optimal growth conditions at 30 °C, neutral pH, 24 h light, maltose as the carbon source, and peptone as the nitrogen source. For T. simmonsii, a temperature of 60 °C for 15 min was lethal, and the highest spore production occurred at 25 °C, neutral to slightly acidic pH, and 24 h light, with sucrose as the carbon source and yeast powder as the nitrogen source. For T. minioluteus, a temperature of 65 °C for 15 min was also lethal, with optimal colony growth at 25 °C, neutral to slightly acidic pH, 24 h darkness, maltose as the carbon source, and peptone as the nitrogen source. For maximum spore production, the conditions were 20 °C, neutral to slightly alkaline pH, and 24 h darkness, with sucrose as the carbon source and ammonium sulfate as the nitrogen source.
The study also found that the relative contents of sulfur compounds in onion tissues infected with WRX-1, WRX-2, and WRX-3 were significantly reduced by 16.47%, 49.35%, and 42.86%, respectively, compared to healthy and uninfected onion tissues. Furthermore, it still needs to be investigated whether mycotoxins accumulate in the onion tissues during the storage process of rotten onions and how we can affect the primary functional components of onions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.W., H.Z. and J.X.; methodology, R.W. and Q.Z.; software, H.Z.; validation, H.Z. and J.X.; formal analysis, R.W.; investigation, J.L. and K.J.; resources, H.X. and Y.B.; data curation, R.W.; writing—original draft preparation, R.W.; writing—review and editing, H.X.; visualization, J.L.; supervision, Y.B.; project administration, H.X.; funding acquisition, H.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Major Science and Technology Projects of Gansu Province (21ZD4NA016), the Natural Science Foundation of China (32050566), and the Project of Enterprise Supporting Plan (2022CYZC-45).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, S.U.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, S.H.; Lee, J.S.; Ohnisi-Kameyama, M.; Kozukue, N.; Levin, C.E.; Friedman, M. Flavonoid content in fresh, home-processed, and light-exposed onions and in dehydrated commercial onion products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8541–8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, C.Y.; Guo, H.W.; Zhang, W.X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, X.Y. Research progress on nutritional components and health benefits of onion. Food Mach. 2014, 30, 305–309. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, L. Research Progress on Physical Preservation Technology of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Köycü, N.D.; Özer, N. Determination of seedborne fungi in Onion and their transmission to Onion sets. Phytoparasitica 1997, 25, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wen, J.W.; Zhu, L.; Gao, J. Preliminary study on the occurrence and prevention of onion purple spot disease. J. Agric. Univ. 2003, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong, Q.P.; Jia, M.; Chen, X.D. How to prevent and treat purple spot of onion. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2008, 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shan, C.H. Investigation and control technology of onion downy mildew in Xichang City. J. Chang. Veg. 2009, 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, J.Z. Regularity and influencing factors of downy mildew of onion. Chin. Veg. 2007, 1, 60–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, Y.H. Study on Quality Change of Different Onion Varieties After Storage and Identification of a Storage Disease. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gong, D.; Bi, Y.; Jiang, H.; Xue, S.L.; Wang, Z.H.; Li, Y.C.; Zong, Y.Y.; Dov, P. A comparison of postharvest physiology, quality and volatile compounds of ‘Fuji’ and ‘Delicious’ apples inoculated with Penicillium expansum. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 150, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ge, Y.Q.; Ni, Y.Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Qiao, X.G.; Huang, X.F.; Jie, F. Study on three traditional spices of ginger, garlic and onion. Food Ferment. Ind. 2003, 29, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamini, E.N.; Syedaa, A. Antimicrobial activity of garlic and onion extracts. Pharmazie 1983, 38, 747–748. [Google Scholar]
  13. Maidment, D.C.; Dembny, Z.; Watts, D.T. The antibacterial activity of 12 Alliums against Escherichia coli. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001, 31, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jirovetz, L.; Koch, H.P.; Jager, W.; Remberg, G. Investigations of German onionoil by GC-MS and GC-FTIR. Pharmazie 1992, 47, 455–456. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xi, J.; Yang, D.; Xue, H.; Liu, Z.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Shang, S. Isolation of the main pathogens causing postharvest disease in Fresh Angelica sinensis during different storage stages and impacts of ozone treatment on disease development and my cotoxin production. Toxins 2023, 15, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, J.; Ruan, Y.; Jin, S.; Wang, L. The importance of Talaromyces and its taxonomic studies. J. Fungal Res. 2021, 19, 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cai, F.; Druzhinina, I.S. In honor of John Bissett: Authoritative guidelines on molecular identification of Trichoderma. Fungal Divers. 2021, 107, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lv, B.Y.; Yang, X.; Xue, H.L.; Nan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Bi, Y.; Shang, S. Isolation of main pathogens causing postharvest disease in fresh Codonopsis pilosula during different storage stages and ozone control against disease and mycotoxin accumulation. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Raja, H.A.; Miller, A.N.; Pearce, C.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Fungal identification using molecular tools: A primer for the natural products research community. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 756–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, S.B.; Go, S.J.; Shin, H.D.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Mycologia 2005, 97, 1316–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Donnell, K.; Nirenberg, H.I.; Aoki, T.; Cigelnik, E. A multigene phylogeny of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: Detection of additional phylogenetically distinct species. Mycoscience 2000, 41, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Du, G.; Zhen, Y.; Chen, B.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Q.; He, S.; Li, Z. Effects of several vegetable oils on conidial germination of Nomura L. J. Microbiol. 2015, 42, 690–698. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernandes, S.; Gois, A.; Mendes, F.; Perestrelo, R.; Medina, S.; Câmara, J.S. Typicality assessment of onions (Allium cepa) from different geographical regions based on the volatile signature and chemometric tools. Foods 2020, 9, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhai, M.M.; Li, J.; Jiang, C.X.; Shi, Y.-P.; Di, D.-L.; Crews, P.; Wu, Q.-X. The bioactive secondary metabolites from Talaromyces species. Nat. Prod. Bioprosp. 2016, 6, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, C.X.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, T.; Xian, L.; Liao, L.S.; Liu, J.L.; Feng, J.X. Genome sequencing and analysis of Talaromyces pinophilus provide insights into biotechnological applications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vinale, F.; Nicoletti, R.; Lacatena, F.; Marra, R.; Sacco, A.; Lombardi, N.; D’errico, G.; Digilio, M.C.; Lorito, M.; Woo, S.L. Secondary metabolites from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces pinophilus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khalmuratova, I.; Kim, H.; Nam, Y.J.; Oh, Y.; Jeong, M.-J.; Choi, H.-R.; You, Y.-H.; Choo, Y.-S.; Lee, I.-J.; Shin, J.-H.; et al. Diversity and plant growth promoting capacity of endophytic fungi associated with halophytic plants from the west coast of Korea. Mycobiology 2015, 43, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patel, D.; Patel, A.; Patel, M.; Goswami, D. Talaromyces pinophilus strain M13: A portrayal of novel groundbreaking fungal strain for phytointensifcation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 8758–8769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdel-Rahim, I.R.; Abo-Elyousr, K.A.M. Talaromyces pinophilus strain AUN-1 as a novel mycoparasite of Botrytis cinerea, the pathogen of onion scape and umbel blights. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 212–213, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alagesaboopathi, C. Biological control of damping-of disease of cotton seedling. Curr. Sci. 1994, 66, 865–867. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, Y.Q.; Li, R.H.; Zhang, H.B.; Wu, M.; Hu, X.Q. Purification, characterization, and application of a thermostable dextranase from Talaromyces pinophilus. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xue, A.G.; Chen, Y.; Voldeng, H.D.; Fedak, G.; Savard, M.E.; Längle, T.; Zhang, J.; Harman, G.E. Concentration and cultivar effects on efficacy of CLO-1 biofungicide in controlling Fusarium head blight of wheat. Biol. Control 2014, 73, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yao, R.L. Pathogen Identification of Maize Ear Rot; Study on Toxic Production Conditions and Field Control. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Tai’yuan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, G.Z.; Zhang, X.J.; Chen, Q.; Li, Z.; Guo, K.; Yang, H.T. Isolation and identification of three new recorded species from China within Trichoderma harziensis complex species. Shandong Sci. 2015, 28, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cao, Z.J.; Qin, W.T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.X.; Zheng, S.Y. Three New Trichoderma Species in Harzianum Clade Associated with the Contaminated Substrates of Edible Fungi. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stefan, S.; Danijela, R.; Katarina, G. Talaromyces minioluteus: New Postharvest Fungal Pathogen in Serbia. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 656–667. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ying, C.; Zhang, Y.H.; Wang, D.M. Technology of onion seed harvesting. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 53–54. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zalepugin, D.Y.; Tilkunova, N.A.; Chernyshova, I.V. Stability of thiosulfinates from garlic (Allium sativum L.) supercritical extracts in polar and nonpolar solvents. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 9, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Taglienti, A.; Araniti, F.; Piscopo, A.; Tiberini, A. Characterization of volatile organic compounds in ‘Rossa di Tropea’ onion by means of headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS/SPME GC-MS) and sensory analysis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vikram, A.; Prithiviraj, B.; Hamzehzarghani, H.; Kushalappa, A. Volatile metabolite profiling to discriminate diseases of McIntosh apple inoculated with fungal pathogens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1333–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Encinas-Basurto, D.; Valenzuela-Quintanar, M.I.; Sánchez-Estrada, A.; Tiznado-Hernández, M.E.; Rodríguez-Félix, A.; Troncoso-Rojas, R. Alterations in volatile metabolites profile of fresh tomatoes in response to Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl. 1912 infection. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 77, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Symptoms of onion stem rot during storage stage. (a1) symptoms of onion stem rot (a2) local and special symptoms of onion stem rot. (a3) magnification of local and special symptoms of onion stem rot. (a4) water stains, a disease symptom of the tissue under the mold layer of stem rot.
Figure 1. Symptoms of onion stem rot during storage stage. (a1) symptoms of onion stem rot (a2) local and special symptoms of onion stem rot. (a3) magnification of local and special symptoms of onion stem rot. (a4) water stains, a disease symptom of the tissue under the mold layer of stem rot.
Jof 10 00789 g001
Figure 2. Morphological observation of pathogens. (A,B) WRX-1 colony morphology; (C,D) WRX-2 colony morphology; (E,F) WRX-3 colony morphology; (G) WRX-1 spore morphology; (H) WRX-2 spore morphology; (I) WRX-3 spore morphology; (J) WRX-1 sporophyte morphology; (K) WRX-2 sporophyte morphology; (L) WRX-3 sporophyte morphology.
Figure 2. Morphological observation of pathogens. (A,B) WRX-1 colony morphology; (C,D) WRX-2 colony morphology; (E,F) WRX-3 colony morphology; (G) WRX-1 spore morphology; (H) WRX-2 spore morphology; (I) WRX-3 spore morphology; (J) WRX-1 sporophyte morphology; (K) WRX-2 sporophyte morphology; (L) WRX-3 sporophyte morphology.
Jof 10 00789 g002
Figure 3. Gel electrophoresis of PCR amplification products.
Figure 3. Gel electrophoresis of PCR amplification products.
Jof 10 00789 g003
Figure 4. ITS, Bt, RPB2, and CMD phylogenetic trees based on the adjacency sequence method (A) ITS, (B) BT, (C) RBP2, (D) CMD.
Figure 4. ITS, Bt, RPB2, and CMD phylogenetic trees based on the adjacency sequence method (A) ITS, (B) BT, (C) RBP2, (D) CMD.
Jof 10 00789 g004aJof 10 00789 g004b
Figure 5. Incidences and disease indices of WRX-1 (A), WRX-2 (B), and WRX-3 (C). Vertical lines indicate standard error (±SE); different letters indicate statistically significant differences in variables (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Incidences and disease indices of WRX-1 (A), WRX-2 (B), and WRX-3 (C). Vertical lines indicate standard error (±SE); different letters indicate statistically significant differences in variables (p < 0.05).
Jof 10 00789 g005
Figure 6. Effect of humidity on spore germination. Vertical lines indicate standard error (±SE); different letters indicate the difference of variables with statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effect of humidity on spore germination. Vertical lines indicate standard error (±SE); different letters indicate the difference of variables with statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Jof 10 00789 g006
Figure 7. Total ion flow chromatogram of volatile components in onions.
Figure 7. Total ion flow chromatogram of volatile components in onions.
Jof 10 00789 g007
Table 1. Primers and sequences for molecular biological identification of pathogenic pathogens.
Table 1. Primers and sequences for molecular biological identification of pathogenic pathogens.
Molecular MarkerPrimerDirectionReferencePrimer Sequence
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS)ITS1Forward[19,20]5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′
ITS4Reverse5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′
β-Tubulin (BenA)Bt2aForward[20]5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′
Bt2bReverse5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3
Calmodulin (CaM)AD1Forward[21,22]GCCGACTCTTTGACTGAAGAGC
AD2GCCGATTCTTTGACCGAGGAAC
Q1ReverseGCATCATGAGCTGGACGAACTC
Q2GCATCATGAGCTGGACGAATTC
RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2)T1Forward[23]ACTGGTAACTGGGGTGAGCA
T2ACGGGTAACTGGGGTGAACA
F1ReverseTCACAGTGAGTCCAGGTGTG
F2TCGCAATGCGTCCAGGTATG
Table 2. Disease classification standard.
Table 2. Disease classification standard.
Disease RatingSymptom
0No disease
1Scale disease area less than 10%
2Scale disease area 10~30%
3Scale disease area 30~50%
4Scale disease area greater than 50%
Table 3. Effect of temperature, pH, light, and carbon and nitrogen sources on sporulation of isolated pathogens.
Table 3. Effect of temperature, pH, light, and carbon and nitrogen sources on sporulation of isolated pathogens.
Culture ConditionsTalaromyces pinophilusTrichoderma simmonsii. Talaromyces minioluteus
Spore Production (×107)Spore Production (×108)Spore Production (×107)
Temperature (°C)151.83 ± 0.030 d2.87 ± 0.021 d5.61 ± 0.015 b
202.07 ± 0.060 c4.54 ± 0.055 b6.76 ± 0.036 a
252.31 ± 0.015 b5.18 ± 0.000 a4.5 ± 0.032 c
303.21 ± 0.010 a3.38 ± 0.003 c3.26 ± 0.012 d
352.30 ± 0.005 b2.61 ± 0.006 e2.74 ± 0.026 e
pH50.94 ± 0.006 b2.28 ± 0.329 a2.51 ± 0.015 g
60.66 ± 0.516 c1.88 ± 0.038 ab3.27 ± 0.057 f
72.33 ± 0.01 a1.82 ± 0.055 b4.04 ± 0.055 e
82.03 ± 0.055 a1.51 ± 0.424 b8.06 ± 0.006 b
91.31 ± 0.005 b0.91 ± 0.189 c8.27 ± 0.021 a
101.21 ± 0.01 b0.68 ± 0.010 cd5.57 ± 0.061 c
111.03 ± 0.006 b0.28 ± 0.002 d5.07 ± 0.061 d
Light condition24 h light1.65 ± 0.006 a4.23 ± 0.054 a5.73 ± 0.252 c
12 h light/12 h dark 1.21 ± 0.010 b2.86 ± 0.006 c7.15 ± 0.212 b
24 dark1.17 ± 0.210 b1.44 ± 0.055 b9.30 ± 0.042 a
carbon sourceglucose0.63 ± 0.006 f3.33 ± 0.306 d1.94 ± 0.036 c
sucrose1.73 ± 0.008 c10.59 ± 0.150 a9.23 ± 0.321 a
mannitol1.35 ± 0.006 d3.37 ± 0.321 d3.10 ± 0.105 b
maltose2.35 ± 0.006 a5.94 ± 0.079 c3.28 ± 0.044 b
fructose0.77 ± 0.006 e11.83 ± 0.153 b0.47 ± 0.021 d
β-cd1.95 ± 0.015 b3.43 ± 0.153 d0.73 ± 0.01 d
nitrogen sourceyeast extract1.71 ± 0.015 c1.19 ± 0.021 a2.49 ± 0.026 c
peptone2.87 ± 0.321 a0.52 ± 0.015 e1.37 ± 0.056 d
ammonium sulfate1.3 ± 0.010 d0.64 ± 0.001 d3.44 ± 0.055 a
sodium nitrate0.59 ± 0.021 e0.69 ± 0.010 b1.21 ± 0.021 e
urea0 ± 0 f0 ± 0 f0 ± 0 f
glycine2.42 ± 0.02 b0.86 ± 0.010 b3.07 ± 0.061 b
Note: The statistical results of T. pinophilus, T. simmonsi, and T. minioluteus, cultured for 7 days; each data point is the average of three repeated values; different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Analysis results of volatile components of onion by GC–MS.
Table 4. Analysis results of volatile components of onion by GC–MS.
Serial NumberCompound NameCAS NumberMolecular FormulaRelative Content
CKTalaromyces pinophilusTrichoderma simmonsiiTalaromyces minioluteus
11-Propanesulfenothioic acid137363-84-9C3H8S2 0.26
22,4-dimethylthiophene638-00-6C6H8S 0.80.170.59
32,3-Dithiahexane2179-60-4C4H10S20.080.130.220.06
4methyl (1E)-1-propen-1-yl23838-19-9C4H8S2 0.070.110.05
5Isopropyl disulfide4253-89-8C6H14S2 25.9710.78
6(1E)-1-allyl propyl23838-21-3C6H12S2 6.544.94
7Diallyl disulfide2179-57-9C6H10S22.250.490.23
8methylpropyl trisulfide17619-36-2C4H10S30.220.090.280.05
9Propane dithioic acid67230-81-3C6H10S20.260.26 0.02
10dicyclopropyl disulfide68846-57-1C6H10S20.440.46
11Butyl propyl72437-64-0C7H16S2 0.210.030.14
12Dipropyl trisulfide6028-61-1C6H14S3 3.23.482.2
131E-1-propenyl-1-propyl23838-27-9C6H12S3 0.860.844.8
14Propyl mercaptan107-03-9C3H8S 1.15
15Diallyl trisulfide2050-87-5C6H10S3 0.22
163-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole3179-31-5C2H3N3S 0.16
171,3,5-trithiane116664-29-0C3H6S3 0.13
181-1-propenylthionyl 126876-23-1C7H14S37.661.01
19nbutyl sulfoxide218-511-4C8H18OS 0.17
20diallyl disulfide2179-60-4C4H10S2 0.23
211-allyl disulfide122156-02-9C6H10S2 0.040.2
22methyl (1E)-1-propen-1-yl23838-25-7 C4H8S30.29 0.460.17
23N-(3-cyanophenyl)-2-[(5,6-dimethylthieno)]764694-25-9C17H14N4O2S 0.25
24Dipropyl trisulfide6028-61-1C6H14S3 3.48
25S-(2-phenoxyethyl) thioacetic acid60359-72-0C10H12O2S 0.1
26(1Z)-1-propenyl-1-propyl23838-20-2C6H12S2 5.36
272-mercapto-3,4-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrothiophene137363-86-1C6H10S2 0.82
28(Z)-methyl-1-propenyl trisulfide23838-25-7C4H8S3 0.17
292-mercapto-3-4-dimethyl-2-3-dihydrothiophene137363-86-1C6H10S2 1.06
30Di (1-propenyl) trisulfide115321-81-8C6H10S3 6.33
31Thiopropanal S-oxide32157-29-2C3H6OS0.46
32isopropyldisulfide4253-89-8C6H14S219.93
33Trans-diallyl disulfide23838-23-5C6H10S20.1
34Methylallyl trisulfide34135-85-8C4H8S30.24
353-butenyl isothiocyanate3386-97-8C5H7NS1.85
36Dipropyl trisulfide6028-61-1C6H14S316.69
37Diallyl trisulfide2050-87-5C6H10S31.5
381-methiopropenyl-2-propenyl disulfide126876-22-0C6H12O30.3
391-propyl sulfide629-19-6C6H14S22.91
40glutaraldehyde111-30-8C5H8O2 0.15
41Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane541-05-9C6H18O3Si30.230.57
42octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane556-67-2 C8H24O4Si4 0.22
43Cyclocarboxypropyl oleic acid53980-88-4C21H36O4 0.13
442-nononone821-55-6C9H18O 0.27
453, 4-trimethylsilanoxy phenethylamine55429-13-5 C24H34F5NO3Si3 0.23
46Methyl nonyl ketone112-12-9 C11H22O 16.594.882.36
472-tridecyl alcohol1653-31-2C13H28O 1.61
482, 4-octanedione14090-87-0C8H14O2 7.21.135.07
49N-ethyl-n-nitroso amylamine25413-63-2C7H16N2O 1.76
501-methylhexyl acetate5921-82-4C9H18O2 0.94
512-hexyl-5-methylfuran-3-ketone33922-66-6 C11H18O2 4.128.933.87
521-methyl-5-methylene-8-1-methylethylene-1,6-cyclodecadiene23986-74-5C15H24 0.23
532-tridecanone593-08-8C13H26O 4.593.381.44
542-ethyl-1-octene51655-64-2C10H20 0.2
556-acetoxytropine85644-59-3C10H17NO3 1.24
562, 4-tridecanedione25276-80-6C13H24O2 3.055.322.79
572-nonadecanone629-66-3C19H38O 0.520.51
583-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxopentyclo-2-yl) propane-1-amine66442-97-5C7H15NO2 0.26
595-methyl-2-octylfuran-3-ketone57877-72-2 C13H22O2 3.72
60dihydroactiniolactone17092-92-1C11H16O2 0.12
61Tetradecane, 1,2-epoxy3234-28-4C14H28O 1.86
622-(3-chloropropyl)-1,3-dioxane16686-11-6C6H11ClO2 0.891.2
63Cis-9-tetradecenol35153-15-2C14H28O 0.37
644-n-heptoxyaniline formaldehyde27893-41-0C14H20O2 0.14
651, 8-diazobicyclic [5.4.0] undeca-7-ene6674-22-2C9H16N2 0.81
66Triethylsilane617-86-7C6H16Si9.28 0.28
672-oxazolidinone497-25-6C3H5NO2 0.26
682-triedecyl alcohol1653-31-2C13H28O 0.7
694-methyl-4-(2,3-dimethyl-2-cyclopentenyl) pentylaldehyde60714-25-2C13H22O 2.471.31
7012-(BOC-amino) dodecanoic acid18934-81-1C17H33NO4 0.28
71Nonadiol diacetate1322-17-4C11H22O3 0.14
72N-ethyl-n-nitroso amylamine25413-63-2C7H16N2O 0.48
73cycloundecanone878-13-7C11H20O 0.25
74Benzyl benzoate120-51-4C14H12O2 2.222.643
755-methyl-2-octylfuran-3-ketone57877-72-2C13H22O2 0.1
76Benzyl salicylate118-58-1C14H12O3 0.370.82
772-ethyl-5-methylfuran1703-52-2C7H10O 0.42
78N-nonanoic acid112-05-0C9H18O2 0.78
792,4-pentanedione53759-23-2C15H28O2 0.5
80Allyl stearate6289-31-2C21H40O2 0.13
81N-ethyl-n-nitroso amylamine25413-63-2 C7H16N2O 0.58
82Beta-caryophyllene87-44-5C15H24 0.12
834-hexyl-2,5-dioxofuran-3-acetic acid39212-21-0C12H16O5 0.12
845,6,7,7A-tetrahydro-4,7,7 a-trimethyl-2 (4H)-benzofuranone17092-92-1C11H16O2 0.17
851-hexyl naphthalene 2876-53-1C16H20 1.15
86Pentafluorobenzyl n-caprylate21635-03-0C15H17F5O2 0.11
879-borobicyclic [3.3.1] nonane280-64-8C13H25BO 0.46
882-pentadecanone2345-28-0C15H30O 0.45
89(R)-2-tert-butyl-6-methyl-1,3-dioxin-4-one107289-20-3C9H14O3 1.73
904H-pyrano-4-one,2,3-dihydro6-2-methylpropyl243118-18-5C25H44O2 0.62
91acetaldehyde200-836-8CH3CHO0.6
922-ethyl butenal19780-25-7C6H10O2.67
93m-xylene108-38-3C8H100.14
942,4-dimethylthiophene638-00-6C8H100.22
95styrene100-42-5C6H8S0.12
96Butyl acrylate141-32-5C7H12O20.23
973,4-dimethylthiophene175202-55-8C10H8O4S21.61
984-methylaminobenzoic acid10541-83-0C8H9NO20.23
99octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane556-67-2(CH3)8Si4O40.25
1002-ethylhexanol104-76-7C8HO0.14
101trans-2-octenal2548-87-0C8H14O0.15
102(1E)-1-allyl propyl104-76-7C8H18O11.57
103((S)-(-)-2-hydroxy-3,3-dimethylbutyric acid2511-00-4C11H20O20.64
104Capric aldehyde68846-57-1C6H10S20.12
105Ethyl thiocyanate91-20-3C10H80.78
1062-hexyl-5-methylfuran-3-ketone2050-87-5C6H10S30.5
107oxazolidin-2-ketone497-25-6C3H5NO20.61
108Tetra-(trimethylsilanoxy) silicon3555-47-3C12H36O4Si50.11
109Ethyl thiocyanate542-90-5C3H5NS0.42
110Cyclopentane carbohydrazide3400-7-5C6H12N2O1.14
1111,8-bis-trimethylsiloxy-octane16654-42-5C14H34O2Si21.09
112dodecamethyldihydrohexasiloxane995-82-4C12H38O5Si60.24
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Xi, J.; Jiang, K.; Li, J.; Xue, H.; Bi, Y. Isolation, Identification, and Analyzing the Biological Characteristics of Pathogens Causing Stem Rot of Lanzhou Onion During Postharvest Storage and Studying the Influence of Pathogen Infection on the Active Components of Lanzhou Onion. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110789

AMA Style

Wang R, Zhang H, Zhang Q, Xi J, Jiang K, Li J, Xue H, Bi Y. Isolation, Identification, and Analyzing the Biological Characteristics of Pathogens Causing Stem Rot of Lanzhou Onion During Postharvest Storage and Studying the Influence of Pathogen Infection on the Active Components of Lanzhou Onion. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(11):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ruoxing, Hui Zhang, Qingru Zhang, Jihui Xi, Kunhao Jiang, Jinzhu Li, Huali Xue, and Yang Bi. 2024. "Isolation, Identification, and Analyzing the Biological Characteristics of Pathogens Causing Stem Rot of Lanzhou Onion During Postharvest Storage and Studying the Influence of Pathogen Infection on the Active Components of Lanzhou Onion" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 11: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110789

APA Style

Wang, R., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q., Xi, J., Jiang, K., Li, J., Xue, H., & Bi, Y. (2024). Isolation, Identification, and Analyzing the Biological Characteristics of Pathogens Causing Stem Rot of Lanzhou Onion During Postharvest Storage and Studying the Influence of Pathogen Infection on the Active Components of Lanzhou Onion. Journal of Fungi, 10(11), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop