Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Genomes from Fungal the Entomopathogenic Moelleriella Genus Reveals Evolutionary History, Intron Dynamics and Phylogeny
Previous Article in Journal
Reevaluating the Value of (1,3)-β-D-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phylogenetic and Morphological Analyses Reveal Twelve New Species of the Genus Patellaria (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Species of Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest

by
Aurora Cobos-Villagrán
1,2,
Abigail Pérez-Valdespino
2,
Ricardo Valenzuela
1,
César Ramiro Martínez-González
3,
Isolda Luna-Vega
4,
Lourdes Villa-Tanaca
5,
Aída Verónica Rodríguez-Tovar
6 and
Tania Raymundo
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Micología, Departamento de Botánica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio and Plan de Ayala s.n., Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Ingeniería Genética, Departamento de Bioquímica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio and Plan de Ayala s.n., Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
3
Herbario Micológico José Castillo Tovar, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victoria, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Boulevard Emilio Portes Gil No. 1301, Ciudad Victoria 87010, Tamaulipas, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Biogeografía y Sistemática, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
5
Laboratorio de Biología Molecular de Bacterias y Levaduras, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio and Plan de Ayala s.n., Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
6
Laboratorio de Microbiología Médica y Molecular, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio and Plan de Ayala s.n., Col. Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(2), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020089
Submission received: 20 November 2024 / Revised: 27 December 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2025 / Published: 24 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ascomycota: Diversity, Taxonomy and Phylogeny, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Byssosphaeria Cooke is a monophyletic genus of the family Melanommataceae. The genus is characterized by ascomata smaller than 1000 µm, globose, well-developed subiculum, with a flat ostiole, and yellow-orange or reddish-brown color around the ostiole. The peridium is composed of an external layer of irregular cells followed by an internal layer of thinner cells. Clavate asci have fusiform ascospores, a hyaline-to-brown color, with one or more septa. The genus Byssosphaeria is composed of 29 species: saprophytes, endophytes, and parasites of woody angiosperms, and they are found in wood, leaves, and other decaying substrates. The distribution of these species is cosmopolitan, and four species have been described in Mexico. This study describes, through morphological characteristics and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular markers (ITS, SSU, LSU, tef1-α), four new species of Byssosphaeria: B. bautistae, B. chrysostoma, B. neorhodomphala, and B. neoschiedermayriana. These species are saprophytes on wood rot and are distributed in mountainous mesophilic forests from the states of Hidalgo, Puebla, and Oaxaca. The significance of this study is in the diversity of this genus in Mexico since eight species have been described.

1. Introduction

Byssosphaeria Cooke is a monophyletic genus of the family Melanommataceae [1,2,3]. It was described by Cooke and Plowright [4] and is characterized by ascomata generally smaller than 1000 µm. The ascomata are globose, sub-globose, ovoid, and turbinate, with a basal tomentose subiculum, solitary, scattered, or sometimes gregarious, and superficial with flattened ostiole. The edge of the ostiole can present colorations from yellowish-orange or reddish to even greenish [2,5]. The rest of the ascomata is black, with a coriaceous consistency, and has hyphal appendages that fuse with the developed subiculum. The peridium comprises two layers: the external layer comprises irregular cells with thick walls and an epidermoid texture, its color ranging from brown-to-dark brown, while the internal layer is formed by small, thin-walled, light-brown cells. Hamathecium is typically trabecular, thick, with long trabeculated pseudoparaphyses embedded in mucilage and anastomosing between and above the asci [6]. Asci are bitunicate, cylindrical–clavate-to-clavate, broadly rounded apically with an ocular chamber, and octospored; fusiform ascospores taper at both ends, mostly straight, sometimes slightly curved, and are hyaline or pale brown, with a single central septum, slightly constricted, smooth or slightly warty, and can be uniseriate or biseriate [2,5,7,8]. Coelomycetous asexual morphs present similarities with Pyrenochaeta o Chaetophoma [2,5,9,10,11], developing pycnidia with conidiogenous cells, referred to as phialides, that occupy the cavity, with ellipsoidal or subglobose, and hyaline conidia [5,7].
Byssosphaeria species are saprobes, endophytes, and parasites of woody angiosperms. These specimens are found on debarked wood, bark, fallen branches, and fallen and decaying leaves, as well as on petioles and pericarps. These species present a cosmopolitan distribution in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine habitats [2,3,5,7,12].
Currently, 29 species are recognized according to the Index Fungorum [13]. Four species have been reported in Mexico: Byssosphaeria jamaicana (Sivan.) M.E. Barr from the tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) on Quercus fruit cupules on the ground [14] and on decomposing wood remains in an abandoned coffee plantation, both reports from the state of Veracruz [15]; Byssosphaeria rhodomphala (Berk.) Cooke, from the TMCF in Veracruz [15]; Byssosphaeria schiedermayriana (Fuckel) M. E. Barr, on decaying wood, in the Quercus Forest in Veracruz [15]; from the tropical cloud forest in Hidalgo [16] and Oaxaca state [17]; and finally, Byssosphaeria xestothele (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) M.E. Barr, on old leaves of Loranthus crassipes in Tamasopo, San Luis Potosí state [5], in the relict forest of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana in Veracruz [15], and leaf litter, growing in a twig under a Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana tree [18]. It should be noted that Byssosphaeria diffusa Cooke has also been cited in Veracruz [15]; however, it is currently recognized as Herpotrichia diffusa (Cooke) (Ellis & Everh) [2].
The Mexican TMCF is one of the most diverse ecosystems for fungi [19,20]. This biome in Mexico has been well described by Raymundo et al. [21] and is one of the world’s most diverse areas for these taxa. Describing and understanding the fungal species in the TMCF is essential for different reasons; mainly, characterizing fungal diversity in the TMCF is relevant for forest conservation, and these forests are a source of bioactive secondary metabolites [22].
This study aimed to describe four species of Byssosphaeria through morphological and molecular characteristics from the Mexican TMCF.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphology

A review of the fungal collection at the ENCB-IPN herbarium was conducted. The specimens were collected from different TMCFs in Mexico, in the following physiographic provinces: Sierra Madre Oriental in the Huasteco Karst in the municipalities of Tlanchinol, Hidalgo state, and Naupan, Puebla state; in the Eje Neovolcánico, subprovince of the lakes and volcanoes of Anáhuac, in the municipality of Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo state; and the Sierra Madre del Sur, subprovince of Sierra Madre de Oaxaca, in the municipality of Santiago Camotlán, Oaxaca state. The climate is temperate and humid, and the altitudes range from 700 to 1600 m asl (meters above sea level) and from 1900 to 2100 to 4000 m asl in Santiago Camotlán. [23]. The specimens were examined using traditional mycology techniques. The ascomata were measured using a stereoscopic microscope (S9-E, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany and Stemi SV 11, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Transverse sections were made in the midsection of the pseudothecia, which were mounted in temporary preparations with 70% alcohol and 5% KOH. These samples were observed under an optical microscope at 400× and 1000× (Zeiss K-7, Jena, Germany) to describe the following characteristics: the reaction of the peridium coloration with KOH; the thickness of the peridium; the size, shape, and diameter of the paraphyses; and the size, shape, number, and arrangement of the ascospores in the ascus. Additionally, the ascospores’ size, shape, and color were recorded based on the descriptions [5,7,15,24]. Furthermore, using the phase-contrast illumination technique, the asci and ascospores were observed at 1000× under an optical microscope (Zeiss Axiophot, Germany), adapted to the Zen 2012 capture program.

2.2. Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing of DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from herbarium specimens using the CTAB method [25]. The DNA was quantified with a Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The nuclear genes regions, such as the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit nuclear rRNA gene (LSU), small subunit nuclear rRNA gene (SSU), and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α), were amplified using the primers shown in Table 1. The reaction mixture for PCR was prepared in a final volume of 13 μL containing a 1x Taq DNA polymerase buffer, 0.8 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (0.2 mM of each), 100 ng of DNA, 20 pmol of each primer, and 2 units of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). All the PCR reactions were performed in a Peltier Thermal Cycler PTC-200 (BIORAD, Mexico City, México). The PCR products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The gels were run for 1 h at 95 V cm−3 in 1.5% agarose and 1x TAE buffer (Tris Acetate-EDTA). The gel was stained with GelRed (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA), and the bands were visualized in an Infinity 3000 transilluminator (Vilber Lourmat, Eberhardzell, Germany). The amplified products were purified with the ExoSAP Purification kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. They were quantified and prepared for the sequencing reaction using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). These products were sequenced in both directions with the Applied Biosystems model 3730XL (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequences of both gene strands were analyzed, edited, and assembled using BioEdit v.7.7 [26] to generate consensus sequences. These consensus sequences were compared with those deposited in GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLASTN v.2.2.19 tool [27].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequence data retrieved from GenBank based on previous studies are listed in Table 2. The sequences were subjected to standard BLAST searches in GenBank to determine the primary identity of the fungal isolates. Fusiconidium aquaticum and Fusiconidium mackenziei [32] were used as outgroups.
The phylogenetic relationships were established by adding newly produced sequences of eight individuals of B. bautistae, B. chrysostoma, B. neoschiedermayriana, and B. neorhodomphala to reference sequences of ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α deposited in the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 1 October 2024). Each region was independently aligned using the online version of MAFFT v.7.490 with the L-INS-i strategy for accurate alignment [33,34]. The alignments were revised in PhyDE v.0.9971 [35], followed by minor manual adjustments to ensure character homology between taxa. The matrices were assembled for ITS with 21 taxa (689 characters), for LSU with 40 taxa (625 characters), for SSU with 24 taxa (810 characters), and for the tef1-α region with 26 taxa (895 characters). Six partition schemes were established: one for ITS, one for LSU, one for SSU, and three for tef1-α, and were created using the option to minimize stop codons with Mesquite v.3.81 [36]. The topological incongruence between partitions was examined using the incongruence length difference (ILD) test implemented in PAUP 4.0 [37] with 1000 heuristic replicates after the removal of all invariable characters. The data were analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI). Maximum parsimony analyses were carried out in PAUP* 4.0a169 [38] using the heuristic search mode, with 1000 random starting replicates and TBR branch swapping, with MULTREES and Collapse on. Bootstrap values were estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates under the heuristic search mode, each with 100 random starting replicates. Maximum likelihood analyses were conducted in RAxML v. 8.2.X [39] with the substitution model GTR + G, and bootstrap values were obtained through 1000 repetitions of nonparametric bootstrapping. Bayesian inference analysis uses the concatenate sequence to combine multiple sequences in a specified order, generating a new complete sequence. PartitionFinder v.2.1 [38,40,41] was then used to determine optimal nucleotide substitution models for each data partition. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MrBayes v.3.2.7 [42] with the following parameter settings: the number of MCMC chains, 4 chains (1 cold chain + 3 hot chains); generations, a total of 10 million generations, with sampling every 1000 generations; initial burn-in for 25% of the total samples discarded as burn-in data; and chain convergence, with convergence assessed by an average standard deviation ≤0.01. Chain convergence was visualized in Tracer v.1.7.2 [43]. The remaining trees were used to calculate a 50% majority-rule consensus topology and posterior probabilities (PP). Trees were visualized and optimized in FigTree v.1.4.4 [44] and edited in Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Table 2. Species names, strain numbers, isolation sources, and GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis. Sequences generated in this study are shown in bold.
Table 2. Species names, strain numbers, isolation sources, and GenBank accession numbers for the taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis. Sequences generated in this study are shown in bold.
Fungal SpeciesStrain/VoucherITSLSUSSUtef1-αReference
Byssosphaeria bautistaeT. Raymundo 6308 ENCB HolotypePQ778308PQ773902 PQ779856PV009316 In this study
B. bautistaeR. Valenzuela 16932 ENCBPQ778309PQ773903PQ779857PV009317 In this study
B. chrysostomaT. Raymundo 6221 ENCB HolotypePQ778310PQ773904PQ779858PV009318 In this study
B. chrysostomaA. Cobos-Villagrán 352 ENCBPQ778311PQ773905PQ779859PV009319 In this study
B. guangdongenseZHKUCC 22-0335 OQ449320OQ449288OQ449337[32]
B. guangdongenseZHKUCC 22-0336OQ449321OQ449289OQ449338
B. jamaicanaSMH 1403GU385152[1]
B. jamaicanaSMH 3464GU385153
B. jamaicanaSMH 3085GU385154
B. macarangaeMFLUCC 17 2655MH389782MH389778MH389780MH389784[45]
B. musaeMFLUCC 11 0146NR185364NG228735NG228698MH581149[46]
B. musaeMFLUCC 11 0182KP744435KP744477
B. neorhodomphalaE. Escudero-Leyva 190 ENCB HolotypePQ778314PQ773908PQ779860PV009320 In this study
B. neorhodomphalaT. Raymundo 4481 ENCBPQ778315PQ773909PQ779861PV009321 In this study
B. neoschiedermayrianaR. Valenzuela 16092 ENCB HolotypePQ778312PQ773906PQ779862PV009322 In this study
B. neoschiedermayrianaT. Raymundo 4199 ENCBPQ778313PQ773907PQ779863PV009323 In this study
B. poaceicolaHFJAU10337 PP460781PP460774PP460766PP475455[47]
B. poaceicolaHFJAU10338PP460782PP460775PP460767PP475456
B. phoenicisZHKUCC 21-0122 ON180685ON180683ON180691ON243583[48]
B. phoenicisZHKUCC 21-0123 ON180686ON180684ON180692ON243584
B. rhodomphalaSMH3086GU385155[1]
B. rhodomphalaSMH 4363GU385156
B. rhodomphalaGKM L153N GU385157GU327747
B. rhodomphalaANM 942 GU385160
B. rhodomphalaSMH 3402 GU385170
B. rhodomphalaHA 400KT313008
B. rhodomphalaHA 200KT313006[49]
B. salebrosaSMH 2387 GU385162GU327748[1]
B. schiedermayerianaMFLUCC 10-0100KT289894KT289896[7]
B. schiedermayerianaSMH 1269 GU385158[1]
B. schiedermayerianaSMH 1816 GU385159
B. schiedermayerianaSMH 3157GU385163GU327745
B. schiedermayerianaGKM 152NGU385168GU327749
B. siamensisMFLUCC 10 0099 KT289895KT289897KT962059[7]
B. siamensisMFLUCC 17 1800 MG543923MG543914MG543917
B. siamensisMFLU 18 0032MH388334MH376706MH388303MH388370[50]
B. siamensisHFJAU10336 PP460780PP460773PP460765PP475454[47]
B. taiwanenseMFLUCC 17 2643 MH389783MH389779MH389781MH389785[45]
B. villosaGKM 204NGU385151GU327751[1]
Fusiconidium aquaticumKUMCC 15-0300KX641894KX641895KX641896[51]
F. mackenzieiMFLU 14-0434KX611112KX611114KX611118
– Absence of sequences.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Analysis

The concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α datasets comprise 41 taxa with 3019 characters, including gaps. The three phylogenetic analyses (MP, ML, and BI) of the datasets showed similar topologies (Figure 1). No significant conflicts (bootstrap value > 80%) were detected among the topologies obtained via individual phylogenetic analyses. The ILD test comparing the nuclear markers yielded a p-value of 0.12, indicating congruence among the nuclear datasets. For this reason, a combined dataset was used for the analysis. The best-fit models of the Bayesian analysis of the combined dataset were GTR + F + I + G4 for ITS, LSU, and tef1-α, and HKY + F + G4 for SSU. The parsimony analysis of the alignment found 1024 trees of 187 steps (CI = 0.1005, HI = 0.1004, RI = 0.2034, RC = 0.1380). We present the best RAxML tree, with a final likelihood value of 26,080.008214. The matrix had 962 distinct alignment patterns, with 3.02% undetermined characters or gaps. The estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.109024, C = 0.102731, G = 0.100074, T = 0.100210; substitution rates AC = 1.000300, AG = 1.002045, AT = 1.000301, CG = 1.000844, CT = 4.000932, and GT = 1.1000000; the gamma distribution shape parameter was α = 0.000721. The standard deviation between chains in the Bayesian analysis stabilized at 0.001 after 4.5 million generations. No significant changes in tree topology trace or cumulative split frequencies of the selected nodes were observed after about 0.25 million generations and were discarded as a 25% burn-in. The phylogenetic exhibited Byssosphaeria bautistae, Byssosphaeria chrysostoma, Byssosphaeria neoschiedermayriana, and Byssosphaeria neorhodomphala and formed a monophyletic group (BS = 100%, BS = 100%, BI p = 1) (Figure 1).

3.2. Taxonomy

The new species proposed in this study are separated into four different clades, with strong bootstrap support, and affiliate with the morphological concept of Byssosphaeria, according to Barr [5] and Tian et al. [7]. Based on morphological, ecological, and molecular characteristics, we described these new species as follows: Byssosphaeria bautistae, B. chrysostoma, B. neorhodomphala, and B. neoschiedermayriana.
Byssosphaeria bautistae Cobos Villagrán, R. Valenz., and Martínez-González & Raymundo sp. nov. (Figure 2).
Mycobank: MB856275.
Diagnosis: Differs from the other species of Byssosphaeria by large ascomata measuring 900–1100 × 700–1000 µm and ascospores that are olive-to-brown in color.
Type: MEXICO. Hidalgo state. Acaxochitlán municipality, in the surroundings of Acaxochitlán, town (20°09′55″ N, 98°11′47″ W), 2200 m asl, 23 September 2016, T. Raymundo 6308 (Holotype: ENCB).
Genbank: ITS PQ778308; LSU PQ773902; SSU PQ779856; tef1-αPV009316.
Etymology: Dedicated to Biol. Leticia Romero Bautista for her contributions to the funga of the Hidalgo State, Mexico.
Pseudothecia 900–1100 μm diameter × 700–1000 μm high, globose-to-subglobose, rounded apex, when old umbilicate, superficial, scattered, or sometimes gregarious and coria ceous; the surface is smooth at the apical part, while the rest has hyphal appendages that shape the very evident subiculum, with abundant hyphal appendages at the base up to the middle of the pseudothecia, which is hairy. The hyphae of the subiculum are black. Ostiole non-papillate-to-sparsely papillate, epapillate with a pore, surrounded by a pale yellowish-to-orange zone, in contact with 5% KOH, it releases an orange pigment that turns vinaceous. Peridium 55–90 μm thick, formed by isodiametric pseudoparenchymatous cells, reddish at the apex and dark brown-to-olive-brown elsewhere. Pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm wide, hyaline, and trabeculated. Asci 105–125 × 11–12 μm, clavate, bitunicate, biseriate, 8-spored. Ascospores (31–) 33–33 (–36) × 5–6 μm, fusiform, olive-brown with a central septum that constricts them in the central part. In some ascospores, apices were slightly darker than the rest and surrounded by a hyaline, mucilaginous, evanescent sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.
Habit: gregarious on decaying wood in the TMCF.
Distribution: MEXICO. Hidalgo state.
Material examined: MÉXICO. Hidalgo state. Acaxochitlán municipality, in the surroundings of Acaxochitlán, town (20°09′55″ N, 98°11′47″ W), 2200 m asl. 23 September 2016, R. Valenzuela 16932 (ENCB), ITS PQ77830; LSU PQ773903; SSU PQ779857; tef1-α PV009317.
Notes: Morphologically, it is similar to Byssosphaeria jamaicana due to the presence of the subiculum beneath the ascomata and its gregarious growth. However, they differ because B. bautistae has much larger ascomata, measuring 900–1100 μm in diameter, compared to 340–550 μm [5], for Mexican specimens of B. jamaicana, which are similar in size at 300–500 μm [14], and 330–450 μm [15]. Another difference is in coloration: in the area around the ostiole, B. jamaicana is grayish-pale-to-pale brown, while B. bautistae is pale yellow-to-red-orange, more similar to B. rhodomphala or B. schiedermayriana. Nevertheless, these species differ in the sizes of ascomata, asci, and ascospores.
Byssosphaeria chrysostoma Cobos Villagrán, R. Valenz., Valdespino, Villa-Tanaca, & Raymundo sp. nov. (Figure 3).
Mycobank: MB856276.
Diagnosis: Differs from the other species of Byssosphaeria because it has a thick peridium of 75–150 µm, very large ascospores measuring (37–) 40–47 (–50) × 6–8 µm, and a grayish-brown color.
Type: MEXICO, Puebla state. Municipality of Naupan. On the outskirts of the town of Naupan, on the border with the municipality of Acaxochitlán (20°10′51″ N, 98°07′43″ W), 1900 m asl, 14 August 2016, T. Raymundo 6221 (Holotype: ENCB).
Genbank: ITS PQ778310; LSU PQ773904; SSU PQ779858; tef1-α PV009318.
Etymology: The epithet refers to the slightly golden area around the pore of the ostiole.
Pseudothecia 700–800 µm diameter × 850–950 µm high, globose-to-turbinate, with apical part completely flattened, superficial, scattered, and solitary. The surface is irregularly roughened at the apical parts, and the rest of the ascoma, the subiculum, is poorly developed. Ostiole with a flattened-to-infundibuliform apex, non-papillate, with a pore, dark brown-to-black, and with a light brown-to-slightly golden area around the pore; in reaction with 5% KOH, it changes to red and gradually loses color to a light pink-orange. Peridium 75–150 μm thick, formed by isodiametric pseudoparenchymatous cells. Asci 122–152 × 10–13 μm, clavate, bitunicate, biseriate, and hyaline. Pseudoparaphysis 1–2 μm wide, hyaline. Ascospores (37–) 40–47 (–50) × 6–8 μm, fusiform, grayish-brown, translucent, with a central septum, slightly constricted, with two guttules and sharp apices with a hyaline mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: undetermined.
Habit: gregarious of fallen twigs in the TMCF.
Distribution: MEXICO. Puebla state.
Material examined: MEXICO. Puebla state. Municipality of Naupan. On the outskirts of the town of Naupan, on the border with the municipality of Acaxochitlán (20°10′51″ N, 98°07′43″ W), 1900 m asl, 14 August 2016, A. Cobos-Villagrán 352 (ENCB), ITS PQ778311; LSU PQ773905; SSU PQ779859; tef1-αPV009319.
Notes: B. chrysostoma is characterized by having large ascospores. Other species with similarly sized ascospores are B. guangdongensis, with ascospores measuring 30–40 × 5–10 µm [32], and B. poaceicola, with ascospores of 32–40 × 7–8 µm [47]. B. chrysostoma has ascospores 10 µm longer. B. chrysostoma shows affinity with B. salebrosa, as both species possess ascomas approximately 800 µm in diameter and ascospores with similar length and width ranges. The ascospores of B. salebrosa are slightly broader, measuring (30–) 40–50 × (6–) 7–9 µm, compared to those of B. chrysostoma, which are (37–) 40–47 (–50) × 6–8 µm. However, they differ in the thickness of the peridium, which is considerably greater in B. chrysostoma (75–150 µm), while in B. salebrosa, it measures 30–35 µm, and at its widest point (at the base), 55–100 µm. Furthermore, the color of the ascoma around the ostiole is also different: in B. chrysostoma, it is reddish-orange-to-slightly golden around the pore, whereas in B. salebrosa, it is yellowish and does not lose pigmentation in KOH. Another important characteristic is the ecological aspect, as B. salebrosa has been reported on Acer spicatum, a tree native to North America (northeastern USA and Canada). However, it has also been found in Vaccinium and Andromeda [5]. In the case of B. chrysostoma, no host has been identified, as it was only found growing in the TMCF.
Byssosphaeria neorhodomphala Cobos Villagrán, Valdespin, R. Valenz, Rdgz. Tovar & Raymundo, sp. nov. (Figure 4).
Mycobank: MB856277.
Diagnosis: Differs from the other species by the peridium color when it is in contact with KOH.
Type: MEXICO, Oaxaca state, Villa Alta District, Municipality of Santiago Camotlán, the road to Río Blanco (17°27′59.5″ N, 96°11′04.0″ W), 750 m asl, 25 July 2013, E. Escudero-Leyva 190 (Holotype:ENCB).
Genbank: ITS PQ778314; LSU PQ773908; SSU PQ779860; tef1-α PV009320.
Etymology: The epithet refers to Byssosphaeria rhodomphala due to similar characteristics.
Pseudothecia 300–500 μm diameter × 400–600 μm high, subglobose-to-slightly turbinate, rounded at the apex, gregarious, superficial; the surface is rough-to-granular at the apical part, while the rest has hyphal appendages that form a very evident subiculum, with abundant hyphal appendages at the base up to the middle of the pseudothecia, tomentose. Ostiole non-papillate, with a central pore surrounded by a reddish-orange-to-intense red zone; the color may be localized only around the ostiole or extended to the entire middle part of the pseudothecia, while the rest of the ascoma is black. Peridium 25–65 μm thick, laterally 25–50 μm, slightly thinner at the base at 42.5 μm thick and widening towards the apex (ostiole) to 65 μm, formed by isodiametric pseudoparenchymatous cells, brown-olive towards the ostiole, reddish turning wine-to-pink color in reaction with 5% KOH. Pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm in diameter, hyaline, branched. Asci 90–95 × 12–13 μm, fusoid, hyaline, octospores, uniseriate at the base (the first four ascospores), and biseriate towards the apex. Ascospores (18–) 20–23 (–24) × 5.5–6 (–7) μm, fusiform with obtuse apices, brown-olive-to-dark brown, with a single central septum, slightly constricted, and without a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: undetermined.
Habitat: Gregarious on decaying wood in a TMCF.
Distribution: MEXICO. Oaxaca state.
Material examined: MEXICO. Oaxaca state, Villa Alta Dictrict, Municipality of Santiago Camotlán, road to Río Blanco (17°27′59.5″ N, 96°11′04.0″ W), 750 m asl,), 25 March 2013, R. Valenzuela 14871 (ENCB), T. Raymundo 4481 (ENCB), ITS PQ778315; LSU PQ773909; SSU PQ779861; tef1-α PV009321; 15 July 2013, T. Raymundo 4623 (ENCB), R. Valenzuela 15047 (ENCB), E. Escudero-Leyva 192 (ENCB).
Notes: Morphologically, Byssosphaeria neorodhomphala is similar to B. rhodomphala in the size of the ascomata, the thickness of the peridium, the asci, and the ascospores; although they vary by a few microns, they coincide in size ranges. However, the color around the ostiolar pore in B. rhodomphala has been reported as powdery, red, orange, or yellow [5], with a reddish crown [52] and an orange-reddish-to-deep red color [15]. When reviewing the type of material and specimens from Puerto Rico and Mexico, the latter authors observed that the peridium in contact with KOH released a wine-colored hue; this character has not been previously described. In B. neorodhomphala, the color observed is red, sometimes appearing pink. Another difference is that in B. neorodhomphala, the ascospores do not show the presence of a mucilaginous sheath, as described in B. rhodomphala. Phylogenetically, these species are not close.
Byssosphaeria neoschiedermayriana Cobos Villagrán, Valdespino, R. Valenz., Luna-Vega & Raymundo sp. nov. (Figure 5).
Mycobank: MB856278.
Diagnosis: Differs from the other species regarding the longer size of the ascospores, measuring 36–46 (–50) µm, in addition to the characteristic pattern around the ostiole.
Type: MEXICO, Hidalgo state, Tlanchinol Municipality, El Temazate, km. 168 of the Pachuca-Tampico highway (21°03′10″ N, 98°38′00″ W), 1500 m asl, 26 May 2012, R. Valenzuela 16092 (Holtype: ENCB).
Genbank: ITS PQ778312; LSU PQ773906; SSU PQ779862; tef1-αPV009322.
Etymology: The epithet refers to Byssosphaeria schiedermayriana due to similar characteristics.
Pseudothecia 400–770 μm in diameter, globose, rounded at the apical part, and defined by a colored area; the rest of the ascoma is black, shiny, and coriaceous, scattered-to-gregarious on the surface, with a basal subiculum. Ostiole has a flattened, non-papillate apex, reddish-orange, with lighter orange stripes arranged radially in the pore; the color in contact with 5% KOH changes to pink-fuchsia. Peridium 60–90 μm thick, with a prismatic texture, composed of two layers of cells: the outermost layer is brown, with cells measuring (12–) 18–24 × 10–17 (–19) μm and thick walls of 1–1.5 µm. The second layer comprises hyaline cells with thin walls, measuring 10–12 (–18) × 6–8 (–12) μm. Hamathecium 500–525 × 450–470 µm, with pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm wide. Asci 142–158 (–170) × 13–14 (–15) μm, cylindrical, octosporic, and biseriate. Ascospores 36–46 (–50) × 6–7 μm, fusiform, pale brown, with a 1-transverse septum, slightly constricted septum, and a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: undetermined.
Habit: gregarious on decaying wood in the TMCF.
Distribution: MEXICO. Hidalgo state.
Material examined: MEXICO. Hidalgo state, Tlanchinol municipality, Km. 168 of the Pachuca-Tampico highway (21°03′10″ N, 98°38′00″ W), 1500 m asl, 26 May 2012, R. Valenzuela 14680 (ENCB), A. Cobos-Villagrán 13 (ENCB), T. Raymundo 4199 (ENCB), ITS PQ778313; LSU PQ773907; SSU PQ779863; tef1-αPV009323.
Notes: Byssosphaeria schiedermayriana is primarily distinguished by the brightly yellow, orange, or reddish-colored area around the ostiole and ascospores with 1–5 septa surrounded by a gelatinous sheath [5,6,7]. Specimens of B. neoschiedermayriana have affinities with B. schiedermayriana; however, the size of the ascoma, asci, and ascospores is slightly larger. The ostiole’s surrounding area is also characteristically orange with lighter orange radial stripes. The color changes from an intense coral color to fuchsia upon reaction with 5% KOH. This characteristic has not been previously mentioned, as in the case of B. rhodomphala, where [15] a reaction with 5% KOH was observed showing a wine color in Mexican specimens and the holotype.

4. Discussion

Byssosphaeria presents high taxonomic richness in Mexico, being one of the best-studied genera of Dothideomycetes in the country. The four new species described in this study are distributed in Hidalgo, Puebla, and Oaxaca, located in the Sierra Madre Oriental, Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, and Sierra Madre del Sur, in mountainous areas characterized by abrupt topography and high beta diversity (Figure 6). Mexican TMCF has been considered essential for maintaining biodiversity due to the richness and endemism of fungi. Important centers of speciation and differentiation of fungi resulting from the comprehensive impacts of the upward thrust of mountains, development, and climate fluctuations in geographic history TMCFs, are the most threatened terrestrial ecosystems at the national level, so they have been classified as “habitats in danger of extinction”.
The first studies on Byssosphaeria were carried out only with morphological data [14,15,16,17,18], so it is necessary to review the reported specimens, as they could represent new species. Such is the case for B. schiedermayriana, cited by Raymundo et al. [16], which is now identified as B. neoschiedermayriana. Another case is that of B. rhodomphala, which has been considered a cosmopolitan species [5] based on morphological characters and is probably a cryptic species.
The morphological characters that provide information for the identification of Byssosphaeria species are the size of the pseudothecia, mainly the diameter; the length of the ascospores; and the coloration of the peridium around the ostiole in contact with KOH, as previously suggested by Chacón-Zapata and Tapia-Padilla [15]. The hosts, the environment, and the type of vegetation which the species inhabit are also important factors in their identification. In Table 3, these and other characteristics of the 33 species (including those described in the present work) can be consulted; however, very little information is available for several species.
In this study, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis on LSU, SSU, ITS, and tef1-α combined sequence data to elucidate the species’ phylogenetic relationships. The phylogeny of the genus Byssosphaeria was constructed with only 11 sequences available for the NCBI of the 29 species cited for the world (Table 2), considering those that mostly have four molecular markers (SSU, LSU, ITS, and tef1-α). Sequences of Byssosphaeria villosa (Samuels & E. Müll.) in Boise [1] were also considered. However, Li and Zhuang [52] mention that the specimen was assigned to the genus Herpotrichia.
The Mexican species were grouped into three different clades. On the one hand, B. bautistae and B. neorhodomphala were grouped with B. siamensis (described from Thailand [7,50], with support values (100 MP, 100 ML, and 1 BIPP) in separate branches. Apparently, the Asian species (China, Thailand, and Taiwan) form a single clade, along with the two species from Mexico. B. bautistae present larger ascomata with a diameter of 900–1100 μm and a wall thickness of 55–90 μm, while B. siamensis forms pseudothecia of 300–500 μm in diameter, with a wall thickness of 38–42 μm. In both species, the area around the ostiole is orange-yellowish; however, in B. bautistae, in contact with KOH, it releases an orange pigment that becomes vinaceous, while in B. siamensis this characteristic is not mentioned. As for the ascospores, B. bautistae has a length of (31–) 33–33 (–36) μm; in contrast, those of B. siamensis are 40.5–50 μm. B. neorhodomphala forms a basal clade with the aforementioned species, with support values of (100 MP, 100 ML, and 1 BIPP). This species forms subglobose ascomata and ascospores of (18–) 20–23 (–24) × 5.5–6 (–7) μm. Morphologically, it resembles B. rhodomphala; however, it is differentiated by the red-to-pinkish color of the peridium around the ostiole in contact with KOH and the absence of a mucilaginous layer on the ascospores. Phylogenetically, both species are separated, grouping into different clades.
Byssosphaeria salebrosa, described previously in the USA and Canada clustered with B. chrysostoma on separate branches, forms a clade with support values of (99 MP, 99 ML, and 1 BIPP). Both species show morphological differences, such as the color of the peridium around the ostiole. B. chrysostoma is light brown-to-slightly golden, which, in the presence of KOH, reacts and changes to red and gradually loses its color to pink-orange, while in B. salebrosa, the color of the ostiole is yellowish, and the pigment does not leach out in KOH [5].
Byssosphaeria neoschiedermayriana shows that it is basal to B. jamaicana and B. rhodomphala, with support values of 99 MP, 99 ML, and 1 BIPP. The three species are very similar in shape, color, consistency, and habit. Globular ascomata have a coloration around the pore of the ostiole that varies from orange to reddish, have a leathery consistency, and are gregarious. However, there are marked differences in the thickness of the peridium. It is thicker in B. neoschiedermayriana (60–90 μm) compared to B. jamaicana at 50–60 μm and B. rhodomphala at 20–60 μm. The asci and ascospores in B. neoschiedermayriana are larger: 142–158 (–170) × 13–14 (–15) μm and 36–46 (–50) × 6–7, respectively; in B. jamaicana, the asci are 80–120 × 12–15 μm and the ascospores are 25–35 × 7–8 μm; in B. rhodomphala, the asci and ascospores are smaller: (50–) 85–120 × 10–13 and (16–) 18–23 (–25) × (5–) 6–7.5 (–9) μm, respectively. In these three species, the color of the peridium around the pore of the ostiole ranges from reddish-orange-to-yellowish-orange, but in contact with KOH, they react differently: fuchsia pink in B. neoschiedermayriana and vinaceous in B. rhodomphala [15]. This character has not been described in B. jamaicana [5].
Byssosphaeria is a monophyletic genus within the family Melanommataceae, and species of this taxon are probably divergent (with a high species richness), as is the case with other members of Pleosporales genera [3,56]. All the sequences available in the NCBI databases were obtained for this study. However, the molecular data for many species have not yet been created, so the interpretation of the group’s evolutionary history is incomplete. Exploring new localities and examining morphological characters of taxonomic importance has allowed the identification of species that are new to science. Identification based solely on morphology has drawbacks, and there is the possibility of errors in taxonomic interpretations [47]. In this study, in the absence of further evidence of another type, the morphological characters used for the identification of the Byssosphaeria species were the size of the pseudothecia, mainly the diameter; the length of the ascospores; and the coloration of the peridium around the ostiole in contact with KOH [15]. Following Tennakoon et al. [47], the hosts, environment, and type of vegetation that the Byssosphaeria species inhabit were also considered relevant in the identification. These fungi have been reported in at least 15 families of vascular plants with subtropical and tropical regions distribution [2,5,7,15,24,45,47,48].
Our results support the fact that the genus Byssosphaeria comprises at least 33 species, of which 20 are found in America, 13 in Asia, and 2 in Europe. Most of the species are distributed on the Atlantic slope of North America. Twelve are recognized for the United States and eight for Mexico, with only B. rhodomphala and B. xestothele being shared. This group of fungi is challenging to diagnose and remains poorly studied due to the tiny size of their ascomata, typically less than a millimeter in diameter. Byssosphaeria species show host specificity; nearly 50% have been documented on specific hosts. Given the poor knowledge about the species of this genus, it is advisable to study them in depth.
In Mexico, such species are restricted to the trees of the TMCF, which are one of the most diverse ecosystems in the country. Mexico’s location in a biodiverse transition zone between the Neotropical and Nearctic regions is one of the leading causes of species richness in this genus.

5. Conclusions

This study describes four new species found in the Mexican TMCFs based on phylogenetic and morphological analyses. Characterizing fungal diversity in the TMCF is relevant for forest conservation and provides essential environmental services. Until now, the number of fungal species has been difficult to ascertain due to the imprecise nature of species identification. Three of the four new species described in this study are distributed in the Sierra Madre Oriental, a complex geologic area characterized by high beta diversity. One additional species was collected in Oaxaca in regions of abrupt topography.
It is essential to inventory and describe the fungal species of the Mexican TMCF: a threatened ecosystem classified as a habitat in danger of extinction. The loss of these montane humid forests has significantly increased in recent years. Conserving this terrestrial ecosystem is crucial to maintaining the balance and richness of this important environment. From the contribution of this work, it can be mentioned that, currently, eight species of Byssosphaeria have been reported in Mexico.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.-V., T.R. and A.P.-V.; methodology, A.C.-V., A.P.-V. and C.R.M.-G.; formal analysis, A.C.-V. and C.R.M.-G.; investigation, A.C.-V., T.R., A.P.-V. and I.L.-V.; resources, T.R., A.P.-V., R.V., I.L.-V., L.V.-T. and A.V.R.-T.; data curation, A.C.-V. and C.R.M.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.-V., T.R. and A.P.-V.; writing—review and editing, A.C.-V., T.R., A.P.-V., R.V., I.L.-V., L.V.-T. and A.V.R.-T.; visualization, T.R., A.P.-V. and R.V.; supervision, T.R., A.P.-V., R.V. and I.L.-V.; project administration, T.R., R.V. and A.P.-V.; funding acquisition, T.R., A.P.-V., R.V., I.L.-V., L.V.-T. and A.V.R.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Instituto Politécnico Nacional with project SIP20240029 and project SIP20240367.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

All the authors acknowledge the municipal authorities of Tlanchinol and Acaxochitlán in Hidalgo; Naupan, Puebla; and Santiago Camotlán for the facilities provided for fungus collection. Likewise, the authors acknowledge Biól. Julio César Ramírez Martínez for the preparation of the distribution map of the genus Byssosphaeria. We also acknowledge Edgar Oliver López Villegas, Microscopy Center at the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas of the IPN, for providing access to the equipment (Zeiss Stemi SV 11 and Zeiss Axiophot). A.C.-V. thanks the Posgrado en DCQB, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, IPN, and the CONACYT scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mugambi, G.K.; Huhndorf, S.M. Molecular phylogenetics of Pleosporales: Melanommataceae and Lophiostomataceae recircumscribed (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota). Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Crous, P.W.; Schoch, C.L.; Hyde, K.D. Pleosporales. Fungal Divers. 2012, 53, 1–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Liu, J.K.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Boehm, E.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Chomnunti, P.; Crous, P.W.; Dai, D.Q.; et al. Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2013, 63, 1–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cooke, M.C.; Plowright, C.B. British Sphaeriacei. Grevillea 1879, 7, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr, M.E. Herpotrichia and its segregates. Mycotaxon 1984, 20, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hyde, K.D.; Goh, T.K.; Taylor, J.E.; Fröhlich, J. Byssosphaeria, Chaetosphaeria, Niesslia and Ornatispora gen. nov., from palms. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 1423–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, Q.; Liu, J.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Boonmee, S.; Jayasiri, S.C.; Luo, Z.L.; Taylor, J.E.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Bhat, D.J.; et al. Phylogenetic relationships and morphological reappraisal of Melanommataceae (Pleosporales). Fungal Divers. 2015, 74, 267–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, W.; Wang, B.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Raja, H.A.; Tanaka, K.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Abdel-Aziz1, F.A.; Doilom, M.; Phookamsak, R.; et al. Freshwater Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2020, 105, 319–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hawksworth, D.L.; Kirk, P.M.; Sutton, B.C.; Pegler, D.N. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 8th ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1995; p. 616. [Google Scholar]
  10. Samuels, G.J.; Müller, E. Life-history studies of Brazilian ascomycetes 4. Three species of Herpotrichia and their Pyrenochaeta-like anamorphs. Sydowia 1978, 31, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Koko, T.W. Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification—Checklist and notes for 2010. Mycosphere 2011, 2, 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rashmi, M.; Kushveer, J.S.; Sarma, V.V. A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 2019, 10, 798–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kirk, P.M. Index Fungorum. 2024. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp (accessed on 21 October 2024).
  14. Medel, R. First records of the genus Byssosphaeria (Pleosporales) in Mexico and Venezuela. Mycotaxon 2007, 100, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chacón-Zapata, S.; Tapia-Padilla, F. Algunas especies del género Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) de Veracruz, México. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2013, 84, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raymundo, T.; Soto-Agudelo, R.; Bautista-Hernández, S.; Morales-Campos, A.; Valenzuela, R. Catálogo de los ascomicetos del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Tlanchinol, Hidalgo (México). Bol. Soc. Micol. Madrid 2016, 40, 79–104. [Google Scholar]
  17. Valenzuela, R.; Raymundo, T.; Reyes, P.; Guzmán-Guillermo, J.; Acosta, S.; Ramírez-Martínez, C.R.; Luna-Vega, I. Ascomycetes from the relic forest of Oreomunnea mexicana, Oaxaca, Mexico. Phytotaxa 2021, 528, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raymundo, T.; Valenzuela, R.; García-Martínez, Y.; Bravo-Álvarez, M.A.; Ramírez-Martínez, J.C.; Bautista-Hernández, S.; Palacios-Pacheco, M.; Luna-Vega, I. Ascomycetes (Fungi) from the relic forest of Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana in eastern Mexico. Phytotaxa 2019, 418, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arias, R.M.; Heredia, G.; Mena-Portales, J. Adiciones al conocimiento de la diversidad de los hongos anamorfos del bosque mesófilo de montaña del estado de Veracruz III. Acta Bot. Mex. 2010, 90, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Medel-Ortiz, R.; Lorea-Hernández, F.G.; Baeza Guzmán, Y.; Palestina-Villa, E.N.; Belingheri-Lagunes, M.E. Ascomicetos asociados a angiospermas en el bosque mesófilo de montaña del centro de Veracruz, México. Acta Bot. Mex. 2019, 126, e1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raymundo, T.; Valenzuela, R.; Ramírez-Martínez, C.R.; Martínez-Pineda, M.; Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Trejo-Arana, A.; Sánchez-Flores, M.; Gay-González, A.D.; Luna-Vega, I. New records of Ascomycetes from the Tropical Montane Cloud Forests of eastern Mexico. Phytotaxa 2020, 454, 161–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gual-Díaz, M. Sistema de Información del Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña en México: Recopilación y sistematización de datos e información. In Bosques Mesófilos de Montaña de México. Diversidad, Ecología y Manejo, 1st ed.; Gual-Díaz, M., Rendón-Correa, A., Eds.; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad: Mexico City, Mexico, 2014; pp. 90–92. [Google Scholar]
  23. INEGI 2010. Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Acaxochitlán y Tlanchinol Hidalgo; Naupan, Puebla; Santiago Camotlán, Oaxaca. Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/#collapse-Resumen (accessed on 21 October 2024).
  24. Chen, C.Y.; Hsieh, W.H. Byssosphaeria and Herpotrichia from Taiwan, with notes on the taxonomic relationship between hese two genera. Sydowia 2004, 56, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  25. Martínez-González, C.R.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.; Jiménez-Ramírez, J.; Gallegos-Vázquez, C.; Luna-Vega, I. Improved method for genomic DNA extraction for Opuntia Mill. (Cactaceae). Plant Methods 2017, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Schwartz, S.; Wagner, L.; Miller, W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000, 7, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 135–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A Method for Designing Primer Sets for Speciation Studies in Filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 2005, 97, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiong, Y.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Biao, X.; Dong, Z. Two new species and a new host record of Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes) from palm (Arecaceae) in Guangdong Province, China. New Zeal. J. Bot. 2023, 62, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Müller, J.; Müller, K.; Neinhuis, C.; Quandt, D.; PhyDE®-Phylogenetic Data Editor. Program distributed by the author, v.0.9971. 2010. Available online: http://www.phyde.de (accessed on 7 October 2024).
  36. Maddison, W.; Maddison, D. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.31. 2023. Available online: http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  37. Peng, J.; Swofford, D.L.; Kubatko, L. PAUP* Phylogenetics Estimation of speciation times under the multispecies coalescent. Bioinformatics 2022, 38, 5182–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lanfear, R.; Calcott, B.; Kainer, D.; Mayer, C.; Stamatakis, A. Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Frandsen, P.B.; Calcott, B.; Mayer, C.; Lanfear, R. Automatic selection of partitioning schemes for phylogenetic analyses using iterative k-means clustering of site rates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. Partition Finder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rambaut, A. FigTree v.1.4.4. A Graphical Viewer of Phylogenetic Trees. 2018. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  45. Tennakoon, D.S.; Jeewon, R.; Kuo, C.H.; Hyde, K.D. Phylogenetic and morphological characterization of Byssosphaeria macarangae sp. nov., and B. taiwanense sp. nov. from Macaranga tanarius. Phytothaxa 2018, 364, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, J.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Bhat, D.J.; Boonmee, S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; McKenzi, E.H.C.; Phookamsak, R.; Phukhamsakda, C.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1–110: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Divers. 2015, 72, 1–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tennakoon, D.S.; Thambugala, K.M.; de Silva, N.I.; Song, H.Y.; Suwannarach, N.; Chen, F.S.; Hu, D.M. An overview of Melanommataceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes): Current insight into the host associations and geographical distribution with some interesting novel additions from plant litter. MycoKeys 2024, 106, 43–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kularathnage, N.D.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Senanayake, I.C.; Yang, Y.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Dong, W.; Song, J. Microfungi associated with ornamental palms: Byssosphaeria phoenicis sp. nov. (Melanommataceae) and Pseudocoleophoma rhapidis sp. nov. (Dictyosporiaceae) from south China. Phytotaxa 2022, 568, 149–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ariyawansa, H.A.; Thambugala, K.M.; Manamgoda, D.S.; Jayawardena, R.; Camporesi, R.; Boonmee, S.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Phookamsak, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Singtripop, C.; et al. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Pleosporaceae. Fungal Divers. 2015, 71, 85–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tibpromma, S.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Bhat, D.J.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Tennakoon, D.S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 840–928: Micro-fungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018, 93, 1–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Jeewon, R.; Luo, Z.; Phookamsak, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Mapook, A.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Camporesi, E.; Lumyong, S.; Hyde, K.D. Morphological characterization and DNA based taxonomy of Fusiconidium gen. nov. with two novel taxa within Melanommataceae (Pleosporales). Phytotaxa 2017, 308, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, W.Y.; Zhuang, W.Y. Notes on the genus Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae) from China. Mycosystema 2008, 27, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cooke, M.C. Synopsis Pyrenomycetum. In A Quarterly Record of Cryptogamic Botany and Its Literature; Cooke, M.C., Ed.; Grevillea: London, UK, 1887; pp. 80–82. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, Y.Z.; Aptroot, A.; Hyde, K.D. Revision of the Ascomycete Genus Amphisphaeria, 1st ed.; Fungal Diversity Press: Hong Kong, 2004; p. 168. [Google Scholar]
  55. Barr, M.E. Melanommatales (Loculoascomycetes). North Am. Flora II 1990, 13, 11–29. [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, J.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Phillips, A.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Ryberg, M.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhao, Q. Ranking higertaxa using divergence times: A case study in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2017, 84, 75–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on the concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence alignment. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses recovered identical topologies concerning the relationships among the main clades of Byssosphaeria members. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony (MP ≥ 70%, left)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (ML ≥ 70%, middle) and the Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP ≥ 0.85, right). The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on the concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence alignment. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses recovered identical topologies concerning the relationships among the main clades of Byssosphaeria members. For each node, the following values are provided: maximum parsimony (MP ≥ 70%, left)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (ML ≥ 70%, middle) and the Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP ≥ 0.85, right). The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Jof 11 00089 g001
Figure 2. Byssosphaeria bautistae (T. Raymundo 6308, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia and color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Figure 2. Byssosphaeria bautistae (T. Raymundo 6308, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia and color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Jof 11 00089 g002
Figure 3. Byssosphaeria chrysostoma (T. Raymundo 6221, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F,G) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Figure 3. Byssosphaeria chrysostoma (T. Raymundo 6221, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F,G) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Jof 11 00089 g003
Figure 4. Byssosphaeria neorhodomphala (E. Escudero-Leyva 190, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Figure 4. Byssosphaeria neorhodomphala (E. Escudero-Leyva 190, holotype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Jof 11 00089 g004
Figure 5. Byssosphaeria neoschiedermayriana (R. Valenzuela 16092, holtype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F,G) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Figure 5. Byssosphaeria neoschiedermayriana (R. Valenzuela 16092, holtype). (A) Pseudothecia on the host surface/appearance of ascomata on the host; (B) close-up of pseudothecia, color around the ostiole; (C) longitudinal section of the pseudothecia and peridium; (D) asci; (E) ascospores with KOH; and (F,G) ascospores (phase-contrast).
Jof 11 00089 g005
Figure 6. Localities of the species of Byssosphaeria in Mexico.
Figure 6. Localities of the species of Byssosphaeria in Mexico.
Jof 11 00089 g006
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Loci/SegmentPrimerSequence 5′-3′T(°C)Reference
ITSITS5GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG58[28]
ITS4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC58
SSUNS1GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC56
NS2GGCTGCTGGCACCAGACTTGC56
LSULRORACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC48[29]
LR3GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGAC48
tef1-αEF1-983FGCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYAT56[30]
EF1-2218RATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTG56[31]
Table 3. Morphological sexual characteristics of the 33 species of Byssosphaeria, including the 4 species studied in the present study, are highlighted in bold.
Table 3. Morphological sexual characteristics of the 33 species of Byssosphaeria, including the 4 species studied in the present study, are highlighted in bold.
SpeciesAscomata Diam × High (µm)PeridiumAsci (µm)AscosporesHabitatTypeDistributionReference
Wide (µm)Color Around the OstioleColor in Contact with KOHSize Large × Wide (µm)Number of SeptaColor
B. alnea220–46040–50Shining black, pallid105–140 × 7.5–1219.5–24 × 4–51–3Light brownOn branches of AlnusUSA (NY)USA, Nova Scotia, China[5]
B. andurnensis0Brown[13]
B. bautistae900–1100 × 700–100055–90Pale yellowish-to-orange zoneOrange pigment that turns vinaceous105–125 × 11–12(31–) 33–33 (–36) × 5–61Olive-brownOn decaying woodMexico (Hgo.)MexicoIn this study
B. byssiseda On Salix alba[13]
B. chrysostoma700–800 × 850–95075–150Light brown-to-slightly goldenRed-to-light pink-orange122–152 × 10–13(37–)40–47(–50) × 6–81Grayish-brownOn fallen twigsMexico (Pue.)MexicoIn this study
B. epileuca Sri LankaSri Lanka[53]
B. erumpens420–520 × 450–55020–30 to 70Pallid105–130 × 12–1520–25 × 5–61Dark brownOn dead stems of Litsea sp.TaiwanTaiwan, China[24]
B. erythrinaeOn dead branches of Erythrina indicaNew Caledonia[13]
B. guangdongense480–640 × 310–50040–70Orange-to-light brown110–160 × 10–2530–40 × 5–101Hyaline-to-brownSaprobic on rotting branches on Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae)ChinaChina[32]
B. hainanensis182–291 × 165–28033–58115–130 × 7–1110.5–13.9 × 3.5–5.21Light clear brownOn decaying woodChinaChina[52]
B. holophaea50022–24 × 82On branchesUSA (PA)USA[53]
B. imposita25 × 60BrownOn dead branchesUSA (PA)USA
B. jamaicana340–50050–60Dark reddish brown80–120 × 12–1525–35 × 7–81–3Light-to-clear brownOn decorticated rooting woodJamaicaJamaica, Puerto Rico, Trinidad & Tobago, China, Mexico[5]
B. juniperi100–120 × 2030–35 × 10–12On bark of Juniperus monospermaUSA (CO)USA[54]
B. macarangae60–120 × 80–15020–30Black100 × 7–1020–25 × 4–51 with 2 euseptateHyalineOn decaying wood of Macaranga tanariusTaiwanTaiwan[45]
B. musae450–630 × 430–54035–80Orange-to-yellow(120–) 125–135 (–145) × (11.5–) 12–14 (–17)30–33 (–36) × (4–) 5–61 (–3)Hyaline-to-light brownOn leaf sheath of Musa sp.
(Musaceae)
ThailandThailand[46]
B. neorhodomphala300–500 × 400–60025–65Reddish-orange-to-intense redReddish to a wine color to pink90–95 × 12–13(18–) 20–23 (–24) × 5.5–6 (–7)1Brown-olive-to-dark brownOn decaying woodMexico (Oax.)MexicoIn this study
B. neoschiedermayriana400–77060–90Reddish orangePink-fuchsia142–158 (–170) × 13–14 (–15)36–46 (–50) × 6–71Pale brownOn decaying woodMexico (Hgo.)MexicoIn this study
B. oviformis1000–1500100–130Dull black120–130 × 7–925–30 × (2.5–) 3–3.51HyalinaeOn blackened decorticated woodJamaicaJamaica, Hong Kong, China[5]
B. pardalios8.8 long0Brown[13]
B. phoenicis580–625 × 600–65090–110Reddish orange100–160 × 10–1525–30 × 5–71 (–3)Pale brown-to-pale olivaceousOn dead petioles of Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae)ChinaChina[48]
B. poaceicola550–650 × 600–80030–45Orange-to-yellow165–180 × 12–1532–40 × 7–81Hyaline-to-pale brownOn dead stem of Arundo pliniana (Poaceae)ChinaChina[47]
B. picta20–22 × 8–100BrownOn decorticated woodIndiaIndia[53]
B. purpureofusca0BrownOn branches of QuercusUSA (PA)USA
B. rhodomelaena10 × 60BrownOn rotten wood.USA (Carolina & PA)USA
B. rhodomphala220–50020–60Red, orange,
or yellow pulverulence
Pigment leaching(50–) 85–120 × 10–13(16–) 18–23 (–25) × (5–) 6–7.5 (–9)1(–3)Light brownOn wood and periderm of various treesUSA (OH)Cosmopolitan[55]
B. rubiginosa20–24 × 4–62Hyaline-to-pale brownUSA (NY)USA[53]
B. salebrosa440–80030–35 to 55–100 (in base)YellowishNon-leaching pigment120–150 × 13–16.5(30–) 40–50 × (6–) 7– 91–3 (–5)Hyaline-to-light brownOn woody substrates, on dead roots of Acer spicatum (Sapindaceae), and on branches of Vaccinium or
Andromeda
USA (NY)USA, Canada[5]
B. schiedermayeriana500–82550–100Red or orange(80–) 100–150 × 12–15(25–) 32–42 × 5–8 (–9)1–3 (–5)Light brownOn varied substrates, rotting logs and branches, endocarps
of coconut, culms, and petioles on wood or cord in greenhouses. On rotten branches of Sambucus nigra
AustriaCosmopolitan
B. semen400–600 × 330–55040–84Pallid80–110 × 9–1220–30 × 3.5–4.5 (–6)1 (–3)Hyaline-to-light brownOn decaying petioles of Sorbus sp., rotting hardwoodUSA (NY)USA
B. siamensis501–692 × 561–72039–42Orange-to-yellow112–148 × 10–1640.5–50 × 7–111 (–3)Hyaline-to-pale yellowOn decaying wood
and unidentified host
ThailandThailand[7]
B. taiwanense450–500 × 460–54035–50 to 75–85 (in base) to 75–95 (wide near ostiole)Orange-to-yellow(120–) 125–150 (–155) × (11.6–) 12–14 (–14.8)30–35 × 7–81Hyaline-to-light brownOn decaying wood of Macaranga tanariusTaiwanTaiwan[45]
B. xestothele330–440 × 330–55030–52Reddish70–100 × 9–1220–26 × 4.5–61–3On fallen branches of Cornus florida or old leathery leavesUSA (SC)USA, Mexico[5]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Pérez-Valdespino, A.; Valenzuela, R.; Martínez-González, C.R.; Luna-Vega, I.; Villa-Tanaca, L.; Rodríguez-Tovar, A.V.; Raymundo, T. New Species of Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020089

AMA Style

Cobos-Villagrán A, Pérez-Valdespino A, Valenzuela R, Martínez-González CR, Luna-Vega I, Villa-Tanaca L, Rodríguez-Tovar AV, Raymundo T. New Species of Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(2):89. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cobos-Villagrán, Aurora, Abigail Pérez-Valdespino, Ricardo Valenzuela, César Ramiro Martínez-González, Isolda Luna-Vega, Lourdes Villa-Tanaca, Aída Verónica Rodríguez-Tovar, and Tania Raymundo. 2025. "New Species of Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 2: 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020089

APA Style

Cobos-Villagrán, A., Pérez-Valdespino, A., Valenzuela, R., Martínez-González, C. R., Luna-Vega, I., Villa-Tanaca, L., Rodríguez-Tovar, A. V., & Raymundo, T. (2025). New Species of Byssosphaeria (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales) from the Mexican Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. Journal of Fungi, 11(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11020089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop