Next Article in Journal
Candida auris: A Decade of Understanding of an Enigmatic Pathogenic Yeast
Previous Article in Journal
Aspiring Antifungals: Review of Current Antifungal Pipeline Developments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 6
Issue 1
10.3390/jof6010029
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Seedling Age on Colonization Patterns of Citrus limon Plants by Endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and Their Influence on Seedlings Growth

by
Bamisope Steve Bamisile
1,
Komivi Senyo Akutse
2,*,
Chandra Kanta Dash
3,
Muhammad Qasim
4,
Luis Carlos Ramos Aguila
1,5,6,
Hafiza Javaria Ashraf
1,5,6,
Wei Huang
1,5,6,
Mubasher Hussain
7,
Shiman Chen
1 and
Liande Wang
1,5,6,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Plant Health Theme, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
3
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3300, Bangladesh
4
Ministry of Agriculture Key Lab of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
5
Plant Protection College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
6
Institute of Applied Ecology and Research Centre for Biodiversity and Eco-Safety, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
7
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Mineral oil pesticides, Guangzhou 510260, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010029
Submission received: 25 January 2020 / Revised: 19 February 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 25 February 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The inoculation methods, the fungal strains, and several other factors are known to influent the success of fungal entomopathogens colonization in plants. The physiological status of the plant could also be another determinant. In the present study, the ability of three strains of Beauveria bassiana and one strain of Metarhizium anisopliae to successfully colonize Citrus limon plants and the influence of seedling age on endophytic colonization success was examined. Three, 4, and 6 months old seedlings were inoculated with 10 mL of 1 × 108 conidial·mL−1 suspensions of each of the four fungal strains via foliar spraying. All fungal strains successfully colonized citrus seedlings and were sustained up to 2 months in colonized plants irrespective of the seedling age, with differences in the mean percentage colonization recorded at various post-inoculation periods among the fungal strains. The highest percent endophytic fungi recovery rate was recorded in the 3 months old seedlings, where fungal mycelia of inoculated fungi were successfully re-isolated from 65.6% of the untreated newly developed leaf and stem tissues. One strain of B. bassiana, BB Fafu-12, significantly improved seedling height and leaf number. The study demonstrates the influence of seedling age on B. bassiana and M. anisopliae successful colonization in the citrus plant.

1. Introduction

For many decades, chemical insecticides have been the most commonly used method for suppressing insect pests [1]. However, persistent use of these insecticides has resulted in the development of resistance by pests, posing environmental and economic hazards, as well as exposing users to various health challenges [2]. Recently, entomopathogenic fungi have been adopted as an alternative control measure to replace chemical pesticides [3]. Entomopathogenic fungi have been reported to infect several species of crop pests such as aphids, thrips, mites, and other economic insects. Beauveria bassiana, for instance, has been effectively used to control several insect pests, usually through innundative applications [4,5]. Notable examples are Diaprepes citrus root weevil (Diaprepes abbreviates), black citrus aphid (Toxoptera citricida), citrus longhorn beetle (Anoplophora chinensis), glassy-winged sharpshooter (Homalodisca vitripennis), and the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) [3,6,7]. However, aside from foliar spraying of targeted pests or plants with fungal entomopathogens suspension to offer short term protection for plants against pests infestation [7], a practice which reduces the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi due to the exposure of fungal spores to environmental conditions such as UV radiation, high temperature, low humidity, etc. [8], previous findings have revealed the possibility of establishing these entomopathogenic fungal species as endophytes in plants [9,10,11,12,13]. Endophytic fungi can function as plant growth-promoting agents, exhibiting important changes in the development and yield of several crops [14,15,16,17,18]. A typical example is B. bassiana, which has a wide-ranging host plant species, hence, a worldwide distribution, making it the most abundant species of the numerous entomopathogenic fungal species reported to date [19]. Metarhizium anisopliae, on the other hand, is not as common in nature as B. bassiana. However, the fungus has also been reported as a plant tissue colonizer, plant growth enhancer, or as a naturally occurring endophyte [15,20,21,22,23].
Artificial inoculation of plants with entomopathogenic fungi and their establishment as endophytes has been successfully demonstrated in several arable crops such as corn [24,25,26], common bean [11,18,27], wheat [10,26], tomato [28,29], sweet pepper [5], sorghum [30], opium poppy [31,32], and in some other economically important crops. However, aside from the reports of B. bassiana in cocoa by Posada and Vega [33]; Posada et al. [34] B. bassiana in radiata pine by Brownbridge et al. [35], Lecanicillium sp. and B. bassiana in date palm by Gómez-Vidal et al. [36], B. bassiana in coffee by Posada et al. [37], Clonostachys rosea in oak tree by Kwaśna et al. [38], and B. bassiana in horse-chestnut trees by Barta [39], studies on artificial inoculation of entomopathogenic fungi in tree crops are still scanty. Citrus limon and the rest of other citrus species are fruit crops of huge economic importance around the world in lieu of their popularity, availability, nutritional value, contribution to foreign exchange, and industrialization [40]. The prospect of entomopathogenic fungi becoming endophytic in citrus plants would assist future studies to design pest management programs that could mitigate attacks caused to citrus seedlings and trees by the various citrus plant pests; such as the Asian citrus psyllid (D. citri) and its transmitted disease pathogen—Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus; the causal organism of citrus greening disease, which constitute a serious threat to citrus production across the globe [40].
Several factors have been reported as influencing the success of establishing entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes in the host plants. The growth media used for raising the plant [30], the inoculation methods used [26,41,42], the species of the plant, the fungal species, and inoculum density [11,37] have all been identified as potential colonization promoters or impediments. The age of the plant is also another factor to be considered prior to artificial inoculation with entomopathogenic fungi, as the physiological status of the plant might also influence the success of endophytic colonization.
Elucidating the influence of seedling age on the outcome of entomopathogenic fungi colonization in citrus plants would guide future studies in the selection of seedlings for fungal inoculation trials. In the current study, greenhouse experiments were conducted to (1) assess entomopathogenic fungal strains of the genera Beauveria and Metarhizium for their potential to become endophytic in C. limon, (2) correlate the citrus seedlings age with the level of endophytic colonization success, (3) evaluate the level of endophytic colonization persistency over a period of time, (4) examine the prospects of the inoculated fungi to migrate from treated plant parts to untreated or newly emerged plant parts, and (5) evaluate the potential plant growth-enhancing effects of the inoculated fungal entomopathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source of Fungal Strains

The 3 fungal strains of B. bassiana (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, and BB Fafu-16) and 1 strain of M. anisopliae (MA Fafu-1) used in this study were obtained from the fungal culture bank of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (FAFU), Fuzhou, Fujian, China PR. BB Fafu-12 and BB Fafu-13 were isolated from mycosed adults of Diaphorina citri, while BB Fafu-16 and MA Fafu-1 were isolated from soil samples collected from different private citrus orchards around Rixi, a satellite town of Fuzhou, Fujian province, South Eastern part of China (26°21’8.88´´N, 119°16´9.52´´E). Fungal strains were selected for this study based on the outcome of preliminary studies conducted in the laboratory prior to the current study. The sequence data of the 4 fungal strains used in the present study have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database. The accession numbers for BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, BB Fafu-16, and MA Fafu-1 were MG844429, MG844430, MG844431, and MG844433, respectively.

2.2. Citrus Plants

Citrus seedlings (Citrus limon var. Sichuan an yue) used in the study were raised from surface-sterilized seeds washed in 70% ethanol for 3 min and 2% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min and then rinsed thrice in sterile distilled water. To confirm the success of the surface sterilization procedure, 100 μL of the final rinsed water was plated on potato dextrose agar media (PDA, Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) and incubated at 25 °C for 10 days. Following surface sterilization, seeds were sown in pollen trays containing sterilized compost, vermiculture, and garden soil mixes and transplanted at 40 days post-planting into 12 cm × 12 cm × 10 cm seedling pots filled with sterilized compost, garden soil, and vermiculture at 5:4:1 ratio. Prior to seed propagation, soil mixes were sterilized in an autoclave—Boxun YXQ-LS-75S (Shanghai Boxun Medical Biological Instrument Corp., Shanghai, China) at 120 °C for 2 h. This was done to remove existing microorganisms that might be present in the soil. The soil was thereafter left to cool for 72 h before use. Transplants were kept in a glasshouse at 25 °C (± 2 °C) and 65–75% relative humidity (RH), under a 12 h light: 12 h dark (L:D) photoperiod. Seedlings were watered at 5–6 days interval with sterile distilled water and fertilized monthly using 1 g·L−1 Basfoliar 30-10-10 + Mg + TE (COMPO Expert GmbH, Krefeld, Germany) inorganic fertilizer.

2.3. Conidial Suspension Preparation

Fungal cultures used in the study were grown on PDA. After fungal cultures preparation, plates were stored at 25 °C in an incubator. The conidia used for seedlings inoculation were harvested from 14–16 day-old cultures for B. bassiana (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, and BB Fafu-16) and 21–24 day old cultures for M. anisopliae (MA Fafu-1). The conidia were harvested by scraping the fungal colonies from the surface of the agar using a sterile scalpel under axenic conditions. Afterward, the harvested conidia were then suspended in 20 mL 0.01% Tween 80 solution, vortexed for 3 min, and then filtered using a sterile syringe and cotton wool to remove hyphal debris and obtain a clean stock suspension. To estimate the conidial concentration of the stock, 10,000 fold serial dilution of the stock suspension was prepared to enable conidia count, where 100 μL of the stock suspension was diluted with 900 μL of sterile water containing 0.01% Tween 80 solution, and then vortexed for 20 s; and the step was repeated for the next dilution. The inoculum was prepared by adjusting the initial stock concentration to a final concentration of 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 using the Neubauer hemocytometer.
Prior to inoculation, the percentage of conidia viability was determined by plating 100 μL of the first serial dilution on 2.5% water agar and then incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. The viability was assessed by counting the number of germinated conidia. A conidium was considered to be viable when it develops and projects a germ tube that was longer than half of its diameter. The conidia suspension could only be used for inoculation when the average conidia germination percentage was above 90%.

2.4. Inoculation of Citrus Plants

The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design comprising 3 sampling groups (3, 4, and 6 months old seedlings), 4 treatments, and a control, each treatment with 15 replicates. The leaves of the plants were sprayed with 10 mL of 1 × 108 conidial mL−1 suspensions of each fungal strain or with sterile distilled water containing 0.01% Tween 80 solution as a control. The soil surface was covered with aluminum foil to prevent conidia runoff. At the inoculation date, the inoculated leaves were counted and marked, while the plant height was measured. This was done to differentiate between the plant parts that were directly sprayed with conidia and the parts that emerged post-inoculation. In order to conserve humidity, the inoculated seedlings were covered with cellophane bags for 24 h. Treated seedlings were kept at 25 (± 2 °C) and 65–75% relative humidity (RH), under a 12 h light: 12 h dark (L:D) photoperiod until assessment for endophytic colonization was done.

2.5. Determination of Fungi Inoculation Effects on Plant Growth

To evaluate the effect of inoculated fungal entomopathogens on citrus seedlings growth, the height (the distance from plant base to the tip of the stem in cm) and leaf number of 5 randomly selected seedlings per fungal treatment and control were assessed at 7 days interval, up to 56 days post-inoculation (dpi). At each endophytic colonization assessment date, 5 seedlings were selected per treatment and control for plant growth assessment, 4 of which were sampled per treatment for endophytic colonization assessment using a destructive sampling method.

2.6. Endophytic Colonization Assessment

To evaluate the effects of plant age on endophytic colonization, leaf, and stem tissues of the same age on differently aged plants (3, 4, and 6 months old seedlings) were selected for endophytic colonization assessment. Individual seedlings were divided into 5 segments, that is: Upper leaves (UL) and upper stems (US), which were young/newly developed (untreated) plant parts that emerged after inoculation; lower leaves (LL) and lower stems (LS), which were older (treated) plant parts that were directly sprayed with fungal conidia suspension at inoculation date, and the roots. The endophytic colonization assessment was conducted at 7, 14, and 56 dpi. The assessment was done using a destructive sampling method, where plant tissues (i.e., leaves, stems, and roots) were cut into small sizes of about 4 cm length and then surface sterilized using 70% ethanol for 3 min and 2% sodium hypochlorite for another 3 min, and then rinsed thrice in sterile distilled water. The plant tissues were placed to dry on a sterile tissue paper. The outer edges of the surface-sterilized plant parts were trimmed off as the endophytes in this region might have been eliminated during surface sterilization. The plant tissues were further trimmed into smaller sections or pieces of about 8 × 8 mm long and plated on a 9.0 cm Petri dish containing freshly prepared PDA. Streptomycin sulfate and chloramphenicol at 1.25 g·L−1 were added to the medium to suppress bacterial contamination, while 5 plant tissues were placed in each Petri dish, sealed with parafilm, and incubated at 25 °C. To determine the success of the surface sterilization procedure, 100 μL of the last rinsed water was plated on agar and a tissue imprint was done, then incubated at 25 °C for 10 days. The corresponding samples were not considered for analysis if fungal growth was recorded from the Petri dish on which the last rinsed water was plated. The Petri dishes containing the plant tissues were also incubated at 25 °C in the incubator and inspected periodically at 2–3 days interval to assess them for fungal growth. Plant sections that exhibited fungal growth were recorded, and the fungus isolated and transferred into freshly prepared PDA plates to prevent contamination. Emerging fungal colonies recorded from plated plant tissues were morphologically identified by comparing the mycelia and growth pattern with the mother culture and by viewing the conidia and conidiophores through slides preparation using a light microscope (Model CX21FS1—Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in line with Humber (1997, 2012).

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Before analysis, data were subjected to normality and homogeneity test of variances using qqplot, and Shapiro-Wilk Normality test (at 0.05 significance level). In order to stabilize the variance, colonization percentage data were subjected to log transformation before any statistical analysis was done. The Generalized Linear Method (GLM) up to a 3-way interaction was used for analyzing data of plant colonization by entomopathogenic fungi. Data on plant growth assessment were subjected to a two-way ANOVA. When a significant F test was obtained at p < 0.05, a multiple comparison was performed using the least significant difference (LSD) test. The colonization frequency of each fungal strain per plant segment was determined using the formula of Petrini and Fisher [43] as modified by Posada et al. [37] and Klieber and Reineke [44] as: Colonization frequency = 100 × (number of plants from which fungal endophyte was re-isolated/total number of plants treated with fungal entomopathogens). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistical software v22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Statistix 8.1 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Assessment of Endophytic Colonization in Inoculated Citrus Seedlings

All entomopathogenic fungal strains examined in this study (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, BB Fafu-16, and MA Fafu-1) were successfully established as endophytes in citrus seedlings following foliar inoculation across all three seedling-age ranges (3, 4, and 6 months post-planting). The successful re-isolation of inoculated fungal mycelia from surface-sterilized plant tissues plated on PDA confirmed the success of the colonization trial (Figure 1). The tissue imprints and the last rinsed distilled water used for sterilizing the plant tissues prior to tissues plating on PDA did not yield any fungal growth, hence confirming that the surface sterilization technique was effective. In addition, neither B. bassiana nor M. anisopliae was re-isolated from the control seedlings.
In terms of the overall performance of individual fungal strains across the three seedling-age ranges, BB Fafu-12 was the most successful of all the strains examined (F4,88 = 79.71, p < 0.001). With reference to the plant organs that were mostly colonized by the treated entomopathogenic fungi across all the various ages of seedlings, the highest endophytic fungi recovery rate was recorded in the leaves, which was significantly higher than the stems, while the roots were poorly colonized (F2,88 = 138.9, p < 0.001). Out of the four fungal strains evaluated, only BB Fafu-12 was recovered from the root tissues of 3 and 4 months old seedlings, but never from the root tissues of 6 months old seedlings (Table 1). All the other strains failed to colonize the root in all the seedling-age ranges. There was a significant interaction among treatments and the plant organs (F8,88 = 17.10, p < 0.001). Across all the seedling-age ranges, a significant decline in percentage colonization was observed with an increase in post-inoculation time (F2,88 = 6.17, p < 0.001). However, all the fungal strains that succeeded in colonizing the inoculated citrus seedlings were sustained up to 56 days post-inoculation in the colonized plants (Table 1).

3.2. Effects of Seedling Age on the Success of Endophytic Fungal Entomopathogens Colonization of Citrus Plants

The highest mean percentage colonization was recorded in seedlings treated at 3 months post-planting compared to 4 and 6 months old seedlings (F2,88 = 20.99, p < 0.001). When the colonization rate of all tested fungal strains in combination was assessed in individual plant organs, significant differences among the seedling-age ranges were observed in the leaf (F2,28 = 6.87, p < 0.001), and stem (F2,28 = 16.51, p < 0.001), but not in the root (F2,28 = 1.34, p = 0.2776). There was a significant interaction among the age of seedlings and plant organs (F4,88 = 4.18, p < 0.001), however, the interaction among the treatments, the age of the seedling, and plant organs was not significant (F16,88 = 1.65, p = 0.0735). Regardless of the age of seedlings, the foliar parts of inoculated seedlings were readily colonized by all fungal strains assessed (Table 1).

3.3. Effect of Endophytic Fungal Entomopathogens on Seedlings Height and Leaf Number

The seedling growth promotion assessment was done at 7, 14, and 56 dpi. In general, a significant improvement in the height of citrus seedlings colonized by B. bassiana was recorded in the 3 (F8,56 = 8.08, p = 0.0059; Figure 2A), and 4 months old seedlings (F8,56 = 2.22, p = 0.0394; Figure 2B), but not in the 6 months old seedlings (F8,56 = 0.58, p = 0.7928; Figure 2C). Similarly, the highest number of leaves were recorded in seedlings treated with BB Fafu-12 in the 3 (F8,56 = 2.09, p = 0.0502; Figure 3A) and 4 months old seedlings (F8,56 = 2.74, p = 0.0126; Figure 3B), which were significantly different from the control seedlings.

3.4. Assessment of Systemic Endophytic Colonization Migration within the Citrus Seedlings by Entomopathogenic Fungi

Fungal treated citrus seedlings were examined for possible migration of fungal mycelia in-vivo, from plant parts that were directly sprayed with fungal conidia at inoculation date to other plant tissues that emerged post-inoculation. The mycelia of fungal strains that were successful in colonizing the seedlings were observed to migrate from treated plant parts to untreated newly emerged plant tissues. All B. bassiana strains (BB Fafu-12, 13, and 16) were readily re-isolated from the upper leaves (UL) and stems (US) of treated seedlings. However, the migration of M. anisopliae MA Fafu-1 was only limited to the leaf part, as no fungal recovery was recorded in any of the newly emerged stems of MA Fafu-1 treated seedlings in all seedling-age ranges (Table 2). Overall, inoculated conidia appeared to migrate better in younger seedlings, as 65.6% of both the upper leaves and stems of the 3 months old seedlings were colonized, as compared to 18.8% and 25% of the upper leaves and stems that were, respectively, colonized in 6 months old seedlings, while 46.9% of the upper leaves and 37.5% of the upper stems were colonized in four months old seedlings. In addition, fungal mycelia were re-isolated from 15.6% and 9.4% of the root tissues of 3 and 4 months old seedlings, respectively, whereas none was recovered from the root tissues of 6 months old seedlings (Table 2).

4. Discussion

All the tested fungal strains, including the sole strain of M. anisopliae, were successful in colonizing citrus seedlings in all of the seedling age ranges. Although all of the four fungal strains showed the capacity to colonize citrus plants systemically, differences among the strains were observed. This outcome validates previous reports that have indicated dissimilarity between the two fungal species examined in this study with reference to the patterns of endophytism exhibited following their artificial inoculation in crop plants [23,45]. For instance, B. bassiana has been reported to have the potential of colonizing the entire plant, irrespective of the inoculation method used [22,27,29,30,35,37,46]. M. anisopliae, on the other hand, has been found to be preferentially localized in the rhizosphere [20], or mainly in the root tissues [15,21,23]. The variation in percent colonization among fungal strains may be due to their differential growth rate and endophytic abilities [27,47].
The ability of B. bassiana to colonize the roots, untreated newly formed leaves, and stem tissues of treated citrus plants showed that endophytes can indeed be translocated from inoculated regions to the entire plant. Bing and Lewis [48] gave an explanation to this as the endophyte might have been translocated together with photosynthates to other plant parts. The outcome of our study is similar to the report of Resquín-Romero et al. [49], where the leaves, stems, and roots of tomato, alfalfa, and melon plants were colonized following foliar treatment with B. bassiana. Qayyum et al. [29] also recorded similar observations in tomato plants treated with B. bassiana, where the whole plant was colonized following fungal treatment with different artificial inoculation methods. Endophytic B. bassiana has been observed in previous studies to directly penetrate the plant epidermis into the leaf internal organs, moving upwards and downwards from the point of inoculation systemically colonizing the entire plant through intercellular spaces and vascular xylem elements [25,31].
Similarly, the systemic colonization of C. limon by M. anisopliae that was found in this study supports the findings of Batta [50]. In the study, the author reported the recovery of the inoculated fungus from distant leaves, other than the sole leaf that was sprayed with fungal conidia, stems, and petioles, which confirmed the potential of M. anisopliae to move across the interconnected vascular tissues of oilseed rape plant. A similar outcome was reported in tomato plants following the application of M. anisopliae via the soil drenching method [51]. However, these findings are contrary to the reports of Behie et al. [22] and Greenfield et al. [23], which reported preferential localization of M. anisopliae in the root tissues of haricot beans and cassava, respectively. The plant species inoculated, the growth media, and the fungal strains used in various studies are the likely factors responsible for these contrasting findings [11,37].
The sustenance of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae up to 2 months in citrus plants supported previous studies that have reported prolonged sustenance of endophytic colonization in woody plants. Similar results have previously been demonstrated by Brownbridge et al. [35], where B. bassiana was sustained in radiata pine for 9 months. Similarly, B. bassiana was found to be sustained in the root tissues of coffee plants up to 6 months following stem injection with fungal conidia suspension [37]. The higher percentage endophytic recovery and fungal mycelia migration that was recorded in the younger seedlings showed that successful establishment and the effects of the fungi decrease with increasing plant age. This outcome might be due to the fact that the physiology of plants changes with age [52].
The present study also provides evidence of positive plant growth-enhancing effects in response to the treatment of plants with entomopathogenic fungi. Similarly, Kabaluk and Ericsson [53] reported improvement in the yield of field corn following treatment with M. anisopliae. Similar observation was recorded in tomato plants treated with M. anisopliae, where treated plants showed significant improvement in height, shoot dry weight, root length, and root dry weight [51]. Improvement in the stand counts and yield of wheat plants treated with B. bassiana was also reported by Reddy et al. [54]. The ability of endophytic fungi to induce the production of plant growth regulators is believed to be related to plant growth improvement. Entomopathogenic fungi endophytes have been reported to synthesize the growth hormones; auxins and cytokinins in colonized plants [55].

5. Conclusions

In summary, the successful establishment and sustenance of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae as fungal endophytes in C. limon plants provide an alternative management strategy to the conventional practice of inundating spraying of biopesticides in tree crops and against insect pests of citrus. The influence of plant age on endophytic colonization outcome, as demonstrated in the current study, also broadens the available data on endophytic colonization determinants. Aside from the inoculation methods, growth media and fungal strains to be used, the age of the seedlings should also be considered when selecting plants for entomopathogenic fungi inoculation trials. Although the underlying mechanisms behind the higher endophytic fungi recovery incidence and translocation that was recorded in younger plant tissues are still unclear and require further elucidation. Future studies would be focused not only on answering this question, but also to assess the pathogenicity of the endophytically-colonized citrus plants on major citrus pests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S.B., K.S.A., and L.W.; formal analysis, K.S.A., C.K.D., and M.Q.; funding acquisition, L.W.; investigation, B.S.B., L.C.R.A., H.J.A., W.H., and S.C.; writing—original draft, B.S.B., C.K.D., and M.H.; writing—review and editing, K.S.A. and M.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Projects of R & D of China (2018YFD0201500), Key projects of Science and Technology of Fujian Province (2016N0005), and Research Fund for the International Collaborative Program (KXGH17004), grant (CXZX2017211) from FAFU.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all of our colleagues at the Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China for their assistance in raising citrus seedlings and fungal culturing for the study. We acknowledge the support of UK Aid from UK Government (DFID) through International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Villalba-Gault, D.A.; Bustillo-Pardey, A.E.; Chaves-Córdoba, B. Evaluación de insecticidas para el control de la broca del café en Colombia. Cenicafé 1995, 46, 152–163. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kanga, L.H.B.; Eason, J.; Haseeb, M.; Qureshi, J.A.; A Stansly, P. Monitoring for Insecticide Resistance in Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) Populations in Florida. J. Econ. Ѐntomol. 2015, 109, 832–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dolinski, C.; Lacey, L.A. Microbial control of arthropod pests of tropical tree fruits. Neotrop. Ѐntomol. 2007, 36, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bamisile, B.S.; Dash, C.K.; Akutse, K.S.; Keppanan, R.; Wang, L. Fungal Endophytes: Beyond Herbivore Management. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jaber, L.R.; Araj, S.-E. Interactions among endophytic fungal entomopathogens (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), the green peach aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer (Homoptera: Aphididae), and the aphid endoparasitoid Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Boil. Control 2018, 116, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hunter, W.B.; Avery, P.B.; Pick, D.; Powell, C.A. Broad Spectrum Potential of Isaria fumosorosea Against Insect Pests of Citrus. Fla. Ѐntomol. 2011, 94, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gandarilla-Pacheco, F.L.; Galán-Wong, L.J.; López-Arroyo, J.; Rodríguez-Guerra, R.; Quintero-Zapata, I. Optimization of pathogenicity tests for selection of native isolates of entomopathogenic fungi isolated from citrus-growing areas of México on adults of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla. Entomol. 2013, 96, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruan, C.; Xia, Y.; Liu, B.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Fan, G.; Sequeira, R. Identification and entomopathogenicity of newly-isolated fungi infecting Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homotera: Psyllidae) in Murraya orchards of Fujian, China. J. Citrus Pathol. 2014, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vega, F.E. Insect pathology and fungal endophytes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 98, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gurulingappa, P.; Sword, G.; Murdoch, G.; McGee, P.A. Colonization of crop plants by fungal entomopathogens and their effects on two insect pests when in planta. Boil. Control. 2010, 55, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parsa, S.; Ortiz, V.; Vega, F.E. Establishing fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: Towards endophytic biological control. J. Vis. Exp. 2013, 10, e50360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Akutse, K.S.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Berg, J.V.D.; Ekesi, S.; Maniania, N. Effects of Endophyte Colonization of Vicia faba (Fabaceae) Plants on the Life–History of Leafminer Parasitoids Phaedrotoma scabriventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Diglyphus isaea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bamisile, B.; Dash, C.K.; Akutse, K.; Qasim, M.; Aguila, L.C.R.; Wang, F.; Keppanan, R.; Wang, L. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana in Foliar-Treated Citrus limon Plants Acting as a Growth Suppressor to Three Successive Generations of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Insects 2019, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Behie, S.W.; Bidochka, M.J. Ubiquity of Insect-Derived Nitrogen Transfer to Plants by Endophytic Insect-Pathogenic Fungi: An Additional Branch of the Soil Nitrogen Cycle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 80, 1553–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Liao, X.; O’Brien, T.R.; Fang, W.; Leger, R.J.S. The plant beneficial effects of Metarhizium species correlate with their association with roots. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7089–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lopez, D.C.; Sword, G. The endophytic fungal entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Purpureocillium lilacinum enhance the growth of cultivated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and negatively affect survival of the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa zea). Boil. Control. 2015, 89, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gathage, J.W.; Lagat, Z.O.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Akutse, K.S.; Ekesi, S.; Maniania, N. Prospects of fungal endophytes in the control of Liriomyza leafminer flies in common bean Phaseolus vulgaris under field conditions. BioControl 2016, 61, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dash, C.K.; Bamisile, B.S.; Keppanan, R.; Qasim, M.; Lin, Y.; Islam, S.U.; Hussain, M.; Wang, L.; Ravindran, K. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi enhance the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) and negatively affect the development and reproduction of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van Bael, S.; Mejia, L.; Bischoff, J.; Rojas, E.; Arnold, A.; Robbins, N.; Herre, E.; Kyllo, D.; Maynard, Z. Emerging Perspectives on the Ecological Roles of Endophytic Fungi in Tropical Plants. Mycology 2005, 20050554, 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu, G.; Leger, R.J.S. Field Studies Using a Recombinant Mycoinsecticide (Metarhizium anisopliae) Reveal that It Is Rhizosphere Competent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6383–6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Akello, J.; Sikora, R.A. Systemic acropedal influence of endophyte seed treatment on Acyrthosiphon pisum and Aphis fabae offspring development and reproductive fitness. Boil. Control. 2012, 61, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Behie, S.W.; Jones, S.J.; Bidochka, M.J. Plant tissue localization of the endophytic insect pathogenic fungi Metarhizium and Beauveria. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 13, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Greenfield, M.; Jiménez, M.I.G.; Ortiz, V.; Vega, F.E.; Kramer, M.; Parsa, S. Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae endophytically colonize cassava roots following soil drench inoculation. Boil. Control 2016, 95, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bing, L.A.; Lewis, L.C. Occurrence of the entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin in different tillage regimes and in Zea mays L. and virulence towards Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1993, 45, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wagner, B.L.; Lewis, L.C. Colonization of Corn, Zea mays, by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana†. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3468–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Russo, M.L.; Pelizza, S.A.; Cabello, M.N.; Stenglein, S.A.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic colonisation of tobacco, corn, wheat and soybeans by the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota, Hypocreales). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2014, 25, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akutse, K.; Maniania, N.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Berg, J.V.D.; Ekesi, S. Endophytic colonization of Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) by fungal pathogens and their effects on the life-history parameters of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ownley, B.H.; Dee, M.M.; Gwinn, K. Effect of conidial seed treatment rate of entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana 11-98 on endophytic colonization of tomato seedlings and control of Rhizoctonia disease. Phytopathology 2008, 98, S118. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qayyum, M.A.; Wakil, W.; Arif, M.J.; Sahi, S.T.; Dunlap, C.A. Infection of Helicoverpa armigera by endophytic Beauveria bassiana colonizing tomato plants. Boil. Control 2015, 90, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tefera, T.; Vidal, S. Effect of inoculation method and plant growth medium on endophytic colonization of sorghum by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. BioControl 2009, 54, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Quesada-Moraga, E.; Landa, B.B.; Muñoz-Ledesma, J.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M.; Santiago-Alvarez, C. Endophytic Colonisation of Opium Poppy, Papaver somniferum, by an Entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana Strain. Mycopathologia 2006, 161, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Quesada-Moraga, E.; Muñoz-Ledesma, F.J.; Santiago-Álvarez, C. Systemic protection of Papaver somniferum L. against Iraella luteipes (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) by an endophytic strain of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales). Environ. Ѐntomol. 2009, 38, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Posada, F.; Vega, F.E. Establishment of the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as an endophyte in cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao). Mycologia 2005, 97, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Posada, F.J.; Chaves, F.C.; Gianfagna, T.J.; Pava-Ripoll, M.; Hebbar, P. Establishment of the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte in cocoa pods (Theobroma cacao L.). Rev. UDCA Actual. Divulg. Cient. 2010, 13, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  35. Brownbridge, M.; Reay, S.D.; Nelson, T.L.; Glare, T.R. Persistence of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as an endophyte following inoculation of radiata pine seed and seedlings. Boil. Control 2012, 61, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gómez-Vidal, S.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V.; Jansson, H.-B.; Salinas, J. Endophytic colonization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaves by entomopathogenic fungi. Micron 2006, 37, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Posada, F.; Aime, M.C.; Peterson, S.W.; Rehner, S.A.; Vega, F.E. Inoculation of coffee plants with the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales). Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kwaśna, H.; Szewczyk, W.; Behnke-Borowczyk, J. Fungal root endophytes ofQuercus robursubjected to flooding. For. Pathol. 2015, 46, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barta, M. In planta bioassay on the effects of endophytic Beauveria strains against larvae of horse-chestnut leaf miner (Cameraria ohridella). Boil. Control 2018, 121, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Donkersley, P.; Silva, F.; Carvalho, C.M.; Al-Sadi, A.; Elliot, S.L. Biological, environmental and socioeconomic threats to citrus lime production. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2018, 125, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Akello, J.; Dubois, T.; Gold, C.S.; Coyne, D.; Nakavuma, J.; Paparu, P. Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin as an endophyte in tissue culture banana (Musa spp.). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 96, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bamisile, B.; Dash, C.K.; Akutse, K.; Keppanan, R.; Afolabi, O.G.; Hussain, M.; Qasim, M.; Wang, L. Prospects of endophytic fungal entomopathogens as biocontrol and plant growth promoting agents: An insight on how artificial inoculation methods affect endophytic colonization of host plants. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 217, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Petrini, O.; Fisher, P. Fungal endophytes in Salicornia perennis. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1986, 87, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Klieber, J.; Reineke, A. The entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana has epiphytic and endophytic activity against the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Parsa, S.; Ortiz, V.; Jiménez, M.I.G.; Kramer, M.; Vega, F.E. Root environment is a key determinant of fungal entomopathogen endophytism following seed treatment in the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Boil. Control 2018, 116, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quesada-Moraga, E.; López-Díaz, C.; Landa, B.B. The Hidden Habit of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana: First Demonstration of Vertical Plant Transmission. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Biswas, C.; Dey, P.; Satpathy, S.; Satya, P.; Mahapatra, B.S. Endophytic colonization of white jute (Corchorus capsularis) plants by different Beauveria bassiana strains for managing stem weevil (Apion corchori). Phytoparasitica 2012, 41, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bing, L.A.; Lewis, L.C. Temporal relationships betweenZea mays, ostrinia nubilalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) and endophyticBeauveria bassiana. BioControl 1992, 37, 525–536. [Google Scholar]
  49. Romero, G.A.R.; Garrido-Jurado, I.; Delso, C.; Ríos-Moreno, A.; Quesada-Moraga, E. Transient endophytic colonizations of plants improve the outcome of foliar applications of mycoinsecticides against chewing insects. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 136, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Batta, Y.A. Efficacy of endophytic and applied Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.) Sorokin (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Yponomeutidae: Lepidoptera) infesting Brassica napus plants. Crop. Prot. 2013, 44, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Elena, G.J.; Beatriz, P.J.; Alejandro, P.; Lecuona, R. Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin promotes growth and has endophytic activity in tomato plants. Adv. Biol. Res. 2011, 5, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bing, L.A.; Lewis, L.C. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin in corn: The influence of the plant growth stage and Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1992, 2, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kabaluk, T.; Ericsson, J.D. Metarhizium anisopliae Seed Treatment Increases Yield of Field Corn When Applied for Wireworm Control. Agron. J. 2007, 99, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Reddy, G.V.P.; Tangtrakulwanich, K.; Wu, S.; Miller, J.H.; Ophus, V.L.; Prewett, J.; Jaronski, S.T. Evaluation of the effectiveness of entomopathogens for the management of wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) on spring wheat. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 120, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Liao, X.; Lovett, B.; Fang, W.; Leger, R.J.S. Metarhizium robertsii produces indole-3-acetic acid, which promotes root growth in Arabidopsis and enhances virulence to insects. Microbiology 2017, 163, 980–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 06 00029 g001 550
Figure 1. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana (BB Fafu-12) re-isolation from the citrus plant tissues. (A) Leaf, (B) stem, and (C) root tissues following foliar treatment with fungal conidia suspension.
Figure 1. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana (BB Fafu-12) re-isolation from the citrus plant tissues. (A) Leaf, (B) stem, and (C) root tissues following foliar treatment with fungal conidia suspension.
Jof 06 00029 g001
Jof 06 00029 g002a 550Jof 06 00029 g002b 550
Figure 2. Mean (± SE) plant height of citrus seedlings at 7, 14, and 56 days post-inoculation (dpi) with entomopathogenic fungal strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, MA Fafu-1, and BB Fafu-16) or sterile distilled water containing 0.1% Tween 80 (Control). (A–C) are showing the height of citrus seedlings treated at 3, 4, and 6 months post-planting, respectively. Bars (± SE) with different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05 (LSD after a two-way ANOVA).
Figure 2. Mean (± SE) plant height of citrus seedlings at 7, 14, and 56 days post-inoculation (dpi) with entomopathogenic fungal strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, MA Fafu-1, and BB Fafu-16) or sterile distilled water containing 0.1% Tween 80 (Control). (A–C) are showing the height of citrus seedlings treated at 3, 4, and 6 months post-planting, respectively. Bars (± SE) with different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05 (LSD after a two-way ANOVA).
Jof 06 00029 g002aJof 06 00029 g002b
Jof 06 00029 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean (± SE) leaf number of citrus seedlings at 7, 14, and 56 days post-inoculation (dpi) with entomopathogenic fungal strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, MA Fafu-1, and BB Fafu-16) or sterile distilled water containing 0.1% Tween 80 (Control). (A–C) are showing the mean leaf number of citrus seedlings treated at 3, 4, and 6 months post-planting, respectively. Bars (± SE) with different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05. (LSD after a two-way ANOVA).
Figure 3. Mean (± SE) leaf number of citrus seedlings at 7, 14, and 56 days post-inoculation (dpi) with entomopathogenic fungal strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, MA Fafu-1, and BB Fafu-16) or sterile distilled water containing 0.1% Tween 80 (Control). (A–C) are showing the mean leaf number of citrus seedlings treated at 3, 4, and 6 months post-planting, respectively. Bars (± SE) with different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05. (LSD after a two-way ANOVA).
Jof 06 00029 g003
Table
Table 1. Mean (± SE) percent colonization of different plant parts (leaf, stem, and root) of Citrus limon treated with fungal entomopathogens (Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae) at different seedling ages (3, 4, and 6 months old seedlings).
Table 1. Mean (± SE) percent colonization of different plant parts (leaf, stem, and root) of Citrus limon treated with fungal entomopathogens (Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae) at different seedling ages (3, 4, and 6 months old seedlings).
Fungal StrainsdpiColonization (%)
3 Months Old Seedlings4 Months Old Seedlings6 Months Old Seedlings
LeafStemRootLeafStemRootLeafStemRoot
BB Fafu-12788 ± 2.73 Aa80 ± 5.22 Aab0 ± 0.00 Bc62 ± 13.63 Aab46 ± 17.46 Ab0 ± 0.00 Bc70 ± 3.78 Aab50 ± 3.78 Ab0 ± 0.00 c
1452 ± 14.24 Bab68 ± 4.91 ABa25 ± 7.04 Abc38 ± 9.32 ABCabc48 ± 13.88 Aab0 ± 0.00 Bc40 ± 15.12 ABCDabc28 ± 11.30 ABabc0 ± 0.00 c
5650 ± 4.46 Ba40 ± 4.38 CDab16 ± 6.29 Abc32 ± 9.20 ABCab42 ±9.59 Aab20 ± 5.34 Aabc38 ± 8.81 ABCDab25 ± 9.06 ABabc0 ± 0.00 c
BB Fafu-13742 ± 5.45 Bab38 ± 2.73 CDEab0 ± 0.00 Bc50 ± 11.78 ABa25 ± 10.45 ABabc0 ± 0.00 Bc45 ± 11.18 ABab15 ± 9.82 Bbc0 ± 0.00 c
1444 ± 8.88 Ba46 ± 4.18 BCa0 ± 0.00 Bc35 ± 8.59 ABCab15 ± 9.68 ABabc0 ± 0.00 Bc42 ± 13.33 ABCa8 ± 5.26 Bbc0 ± 0.00 c
5638 ± 4.17 Ba34 ± 6.30 CDEa0 ± 0.00 Bb35 ± 9.82 ABCa10 ± 6.55 ABb0 ± 0.00 Bb3 ± 2.50 CDb3 ± 2.50 Bb0 ± 0.00 b
MA Fafu-1730 ± 8.18 BCab12 ± 8.18 DEFbc0 ± 0.00 Bc34 ± 6.29 ABCa0 ± 0.00 Bc0 ± 0.00 Bc10 ± 3.78 BCDbc0 ± 0.00 Bc0 ± 0.00 c
1432 ± 10.17 BCa12 ± 8.77 DEFab0 ± 0.00 Bb30 ± 11.68 ABCa0 ± 0.00 Bb0 ± 0.00 Bb18 ± 8.81 BCDab0 ± 0.00 Bb0 ± 0.00 b
5627 ± 6.25 BCa10 ± 5.39 EFab0 ± 0.00 Bb25 ± 7.32 ABCa0 ± 0.00 Bb0 ± 0.00 Bb10 ± 6.55 BCDab0 ± 0.00 Bb0 ± 0.00 b
BB Fafu-16738 ± 8.18 Bab34 ± 8.90 CDEab0 ± 0.00 Bb34 ± 8.90 ABCab42 ± 5.47 Aa0 ± 0.00 Bb35 ± 15.47 ABCDab20 ± 13.09 Bab0 ± 0.00 b
1427 ± 8.30 BCab34 ± 6.30 CDEa0 ± 0.00 Bc16 ± 9.45 BCabc35 ± 8.59 ABa0 ± 0.00 Bc18 ± 7.96 BCDabc8 ± 3.66 Bbc0 ± 0.00 c
5623 ± 8.30 BCab32 ± 7.99 CDEa0 ± 0.00 Bb15 ± 7.32 BCab32 ± 9.21 ABa0 ± 0.00 Bb15 ± 7.32 BCDab0 ± 0.00 Bb0 ± 0.00 b
Colonization was assessed at 7, 14, and 56 days post-inoculation (dpi). Means (± SE) followed by different uppercase letters within the same column (that is; same seedling age and organ) or lowercase letters within the same row (that is; same dpi and fungal strain) indicate significant differences among treatments and seedling-age ranges respectively at p < 0.05. (least significant difference (LSD) after generalized linear method (GLM)). Data for control were not represented in the table as no fungi recovery was recorded in the untreated control seedlings.
Table
Table 2. Colonization frequency of entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, and BB Fafu-16) and Metarhizium anisopliae (MA Fafu-1) in different plant segments (leaf, stem, and root) following foliar inoculation of 3, 4, and 6 months old citrus plants with 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 of each of the treated fungal strains.
Table 2. Colonization frequency of entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana strains (BB Fafu-12, BB Fafu-13, and BB Fafu-16) and Metarhizium anisopliae (MA Fafu-1) in different plant segments (leaf, stem, and root) following foliar inoculation of 3, 4, and 6 months old citrus plants with 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 of each of the treated fungal strains.
Colonization Frequency of Entomopathogenic Fungi in Different Plant Segments
Plant SegmentsUpper PartLower Part
ULUSLLLSRoot
Colonization %n *+%+%+%+%+%
3 months old seedlings
BB Fafu-128675810081008100562.5
BB Fafu-138787.5787.58100810000
MA Fafu-18450008100562.500
BB Fafu-168450675787.5787.500
Total322165.62165.63196.92887.5515.6
4 months old seedlings
BB Fafu-128562.56758100787.5337.5
BB Fafu-138450112.58100337.500
MA Fafu-18450006750000
BB Fafu-168225562.5562.5787.500
Total321546.91237.52784.41753.139.4
6 months old seedlings
BB Fafu-128337.56758100337.500
BB Fafu-138337.500450337.500
MA Fafu-180000562.50000
BB Fafu-16800225787.5112.500
Total32618.88252475721.900
n * Total number of plants sampled per each fungal strain. + Number of plants from which fungal endophyte was re-isolated out of the 8 plants examined (at least 1 of the 5 leaf discs, stem, or root cuttings showed fungal outgrowth). % Colonization frequency percentage (number of plants from which endophytic fungi was re-isolated ÷ total number of plants assessed × 100). UL—upper leaves and US—upper stems; are young/newly developed (unmarked) plant parts that emerged post-inoculation. LL—lower leaves and LS—lower stems; are old (marked) plant parts that were directly sprayed with fungal conidia suspension at inoculation date. Eight different plants were sampled for systemic endophytic colonization per each fungal strain. Within each plant, upper leaves (UL), upper stems (UP), lower leaves (LL), lower stems (LS) and roots were separately assessed. Five surface-sterilized leaf discs, stem, and root cuttings were obtained per plant segments (total of 25 sections per plant). Provided fungal endophyte was recovered from one of the five discs or cuttings obtained from a single plant, the plant was assumed to have been endophytically colonized.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bamisile, B.S.; Senyo Akutse, K.; Dash, C.K.; Qasim, M.; Ramos Aguila, L.C.; Ashraf, H.J.; Huang, W.; Hussain, M.; Chen, S.; Wang, L. Effects of Seedling Age on Colonization Patterns of Citrus limon Plants by Endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and Their Influence on Seedlings Growth. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010029

AMA Style

Bamisile BS, Senyo Akutse K, Dash CK, Qasim M, Ramos Aguila LC, Ashraf HJ, Huang W, Hussain M, Chen S, Wang L. Effects of Seedling Age on Colonization Patterns of Citrus limon Plants by Endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and Their Influence on Seedlings Growth. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bamisile, Bamisope Steve, Komivi Senyo Akutse, Chandra Kanta Dash, Muhammad Qasim, Luis Carlos Ramos Aguila, Hafiza Javaria Ashraf, Wei Huang, Mubasher Hussain, Shiman Chen, and Liande Wang. 2020. "Effects of Seedling Age on Colonization Patterns of Citrus limon Plants by Endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and Their Influence on Seedlings Growth" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010029

APA Style

Bamisile, B. S., Senyo Akutse, K., Dash, C. K., Qasim, M., Ramos Aguila, L. C., Ashraf, H. J., Huang, W., Hussain, M., Chen, S., & Wang, L. (2020). Effects of Seedling Age on Colonization Patterns of Citrus limon Plants by Endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and Their Influence on Seedlings Growth. Journal of Fungi, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop