Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2 Cultivated in Tannin Substrate for Use as a Potential Multifunctional Probiotic Yeast in Aquaculture
Previous Article in Journal
Gene Expression Analysis of Non-Clinical Strain of Aspergillus fumigatus (LMB-35Aa): Does Biofilm Affect Virulence?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/jof6040377
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of LAMB against Emerging Azole- and Multidrug-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates in the Galleria mellonella Model

by
Ulrike Binder
1,*,
Amir Arastehfar
2,
Lisa Schnegg
1,
Caroline Hörtnagl
1,
Suleyha Hilmioğlu-Polat
3,
David S. Perlin
2 and
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
1
1
Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Schöpfstrasse 41, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
3
Division of Mycology, University of Ege, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(4), 377; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040377
Submission received: 20 November 2020 / Revised: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 17 December 2020 / Published: 18 December 2020
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
While being the third leading cause of candidemia worldwide, numerous studies have shown severe clonal outbreaks due to fluconazole-resistant (FLCR) Candida parapsilosis isolates associated with fluconazole therapeutic failure (FTF) with enhanced mortality. More recently, multidrug resistant (MDR) C. parapsilosis blood isolates have also been identified that are resistant to both azole and echinocandin drugs. Amphotericin B (AMB) resistance is rarely reported among C. parapsilosis isolates and proper management of bloodstream infections due to FLZR and MDR isolates requires prompt action at the time of outbreak. Therefore, using a well-established Galleria mellonella model, we assessed whether (a) laboratory-based findings on azole or echinocandin (micafungin) resistance in C. parapsilosis lead to therapeutic failure, (b) LAMB could serve as an efficient salvage treatment option, and (c) distinct mutations in ERG11 impact mortality. Our in vivo data confirm fluconazole inefficacy against FLCR C. parapsilosis isolates carrying Y132F, Y132F + K143R, Y132F + G307A, and G307A + G458S in Erg11p, while LAMB proved to be an efficacious accessible option against both FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates. Moreover, positive correlation of in vitro and in vivo data further highlights the utility of G. melonella as a reliable model to investigate azole and polyene drug efficacy.

1. Introduction

Although Candida parapsilosis ranks as the third leading cause of candidemia worldwide [1], it is the second most prevalent Candida species causing candidemia in Kuwait [2], China [3], Japan [4], Spain [5], Greece [6,7], South Africa [8], and Latin American countries [9]. Moreover, this species has been reported as the leading cause of candidemia in some single center studies [10]. Contrary to the low levels of fluconazole resistance observed for C. parapsilosis blood isolates globally [1], recent studies from the USA [11], South Korea [12], Brazil [13], India [14], Italy [15], South Africa [16], and Turkey [17,18] have shown a high rate of clonal expansion of fluconazole-resistant (FLCR) C. parapsilosis isolates in clinical settings. Indeed, development of FLCR C. parapsilosis isolates occurs rapidly following antifungal treatment leading to fluconazole therapeutic failure, which necessitates switching to other systemic antifungals [19]. Surprisingly, new studies from Turkey [17,18] and South Korea [20] reported a substantial increase in prevalence of FLCR C. parapsilosis after 2015, which appeared partially due to the expanded use of azoles in clinical settings. Despite extremely low rates of echinocandin-resistant C. parapsilosis blood isolates [1], recent candidemia studies from Iran [21] and Turkey [22] have shown emerging multidrug-resistant (MDR) C. parapsilosis isolates resistant against both echinocandins and azoles. Of particular concern is the horizontal transfer of clonal FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis to antifungal-naïve patients [18,22], which notoriously limit the efficacy of these two most widely used antifungals.
Fluconazole resistance primarily involves alteration of the drug target, ERG11, by specific point mutations, including Y132F, K143R, and G458S [23]. Other determinants, such as overexpression of efflux pumps and ERG11 cooperatively contribute to azole resistance [23]. Resistance to echinocandins in Candida species are orchestrated by point mutations occurring in the hotspots (HS) of FKS genes, but until recently this phenomenon has not been reported for clinically obtained echinocandin-resistant isolates of C. parapsilosis [22].
New late-stage clinical trial antifungal drugs, like the echinocandin rezafungin, show promising in vitro and in vivo properties [24]. Therefore, identifying efficacious antifungals from the existing drug repertoire routinely used in the clinic will allow us to rapidly respond to this growing concern. Interestingly, despite identifying numerous FLCR and some MDR C. parapsilosis blood isolate during the last 13 years in Turkey [17,18,22], none of these isolates were resistant against amphotericin B (AMB) [18,22]. Additionally, the lipid formulation of AMB, LAMB, proved to be efficacious in eradicating invasive fungal infections even in patients suffering from acute kidney injury [25]. Further, AMB is well tolerated among neonates [26] as the most susceptible patient groups developing candidemia due to C. parapsilosis [27].
Determination of in vivo efficacy of antifungals against genetically defined fungal species can be achieved using a wide range of animal models. Although rodents present the most reliable models to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of antifungals, their use is limited by high costs, ethical constraints, and low throughput [28]. Galleria melonella, however, represents a suitable alternative [28]. Therefore, herein we explored the in vivo efficacy of fluconazole (FLC), micafungin (MFG), and LAMB against FLCR, and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates, harboring distinct mutations in ERG11 and FKS12.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. C. parapsilosis Isolates and Clinical Data

In order to explore the in vivo efficacy of FLC, MFG, and liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB), we used six C. parapsilosis blood isolates recovered during persistent outbreaks in Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, between 2007 and 2020, which had various antifungal susceptibility patterns (Table 1). The in vitro susceptibility profiles and amino acid (AA) substitutions in ERG11 and FKS1 in these strains, plus pertinent clinical data of patients infected with these isolates, are presented in Table 1. Except for patients infected with CP30 and CP37, those infected with CP70, CP179, CP207, and L48 have been reported previously [17,18,22]. A C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) isolate susceptible to all antifungals was used as a control strain in all assays. Therapeutic failure resulted when fever persisted and blood culture yielded C. parapsilosis despite antifungal therapy [29]. Antifungal susceptibility testing was carried out by the broth microdilution method suggested by CLSI M27-A3/S4 [30,31]. Details of microsatellite typing are reported in our previous studies [18,22].

2.2. Galleria mellonella In Vivo Treatment Studies

Sixth instar larvae of Galleria mellonella (SAGIP, Italy), weighing between 0.4 and 0.5 g, were infected with 107 cells of the respective C. parapsilosis strain and received antifungal treatment 2 h post infection according to Maurer et al. [32] Larvae received a single dose of 5 μg (15 mg/kg) of each antifungal agent. To validate the Galleria model for predicting therapeutic outcome in C. parapsilosis infections, strain ATCC2209, which is susceptible to all antifungal agents and serves as the recommended control strain by the European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST) guidelines, was used to test concentration dependent efficacy of the respective drug (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1). Positive treatment outcome in FLC-treated larvae infected with the susceptible control strain, indicate that the concentration of FLC chosen was sufficient to cure the infection. Larvae infected with this strain also responded well to LAMB, which not only correlates well to in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns, but also agrees with previous studies in which LAMB was shown to be efficient against Aspergillus spp. infections [33].
FLC concentrations were chosen based on previous work, in which 5 μg FLC were shown to be efficient against C. orthopsilosis [34], a close relative of C. parapsilosis; this concentration resembles the maximum dose for humans recommended by EUCAST rational version 3.0. As the recommended maximum human dose did not show treatment effect for LAMB and MFG (Figure S1B,C), the concentration was raised to 5 x of the most commonly used dosage recommended by EUCAST. None of the antifungal used showed toxic effects on larval survival at the concentrations used. Larvae were incubated at 37 °C and survival was monitored every 24 h over a period of 6 days (144 h). Untouched larvae and larvae injected with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) served as controls; fungal cells and antifungals were diluted in sterile PBS. For each test group, 20 larvae were used (seven strains and three antifungals, namely FLC, MFG, and LAMB); experiments were repeated at least three times. Significance was determined with log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test, utilizing GraphPad Prism 7.00 software. Differences were considered significant at p-values ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern and Alterations in ERG11 or FKS1

Previous studies revealed a growing number of FLCR C. parapsilosis isolates in Turkish hospitals [17,18,22]. Therefore, we chose to investigate some of these clinical isolates that exhibited resistance to FLC and voriconazole (VRC), and harbored the most prevalent and/or novel mutations in ERG11. The majority of FLCR isolates showed previously described mutations in ERG11, such as Y132F or K143R substitutions or both (CP30, CP37, CP207). Interestingly, strain CP179 and strain L48 exhibited an additional, novel AA substitution, namely G307A, which has not been described previously and was a second AA exchange next to one already described (Y132F for CP179, and G458S for L48) [17,18,22]. As no isolates were found with G307A as the only AA substitution, and we did not perform genetic modification to prove the impact of this single exchange on FLC resistance, we do not know if this exchange of AA confers FLC resistance on its own. One isolate, CP70, exhibits resistance to FLC, but no other antifungal drug tested was wild-type (WT) for ERG11. The one MDR isolate chosen, CP207, exhibited an R658G AA substation in the Fks1 gene in addition to the already described Y132F + K143R changes in Erg11, and was therefore an MDR C. parapsilosis isolate (Table 1).

3.2. In Vivo Efficacy of Antifungal Treatment

To determine whether in vitro resistance correlated with in vivo FLC or MFG resistance, hence therapeutic failure, we took advantage of a G. mellonella model of invasive candidiasis. In vitro susceptibility patterns and in vivo outcome, reflecting fluconazole efficacy, correlated for all strains (Figure 1). More precisely, while 5 μg FLC—a concentration that reflects the maximum daily therapeutic dose in humans—significantly increased survival of larvae infected with the susceptible control strain ATCC 22019, no improvement by FLC treatment in survival of larvae inoculated with FLCR isolates was seen (Figure 1) (log-rank test, p > 0.05), independent of the kind of AA substitutions. One-hundred percent mortality was reached for untreated larvae infected with ATCC22019, CP70, CP30, CP37, and CP 207 at day 4 (96 h) post infection. FLC treatment resulted in 70% survival of larvae at day 4 for the susceptible ATCC22019 strain, and even 50% of larvae survived by the end of the experiment, whereas no increase in survival was seen in the groups infected with resistant isolates. Two strains, CP179 and L48, exhibited slightly delayed mortality, resulting in 100% deaths at day 5, or 10% survival by the end of the experiment, respectively. In these groups, the mortality was the same in the FLC-treated group (CP179), or only 10% higher for L48, which did not yield statistically significant difference (log-rank test, p > 0.05). Interestingly, treatment failure also occurred in larvae infected with CP70, which shows positive correlation to in vitro resistance, although there was no mutation detected in ERG11, indicating other mechanisms of drug resistance such as overexpression of drug efflux pumps, which were not investigated in this study [23]. Remarkably, none of the infected larval samples, independent of the in vitro susceptibility profile of the strains to MFG, exhibited an increase in survival rate when receiving MFG (5 μg) (Figure 1). Although no toxic effects were observed in the control groups receiving MFG only, our data raise doubts on whether Galleria larvae are the ideal model to study MFG efficacy in vivo and further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of larvae to test echinocandine efficacy.
As MFG showed to be not an alternative treatment option at least in our model, LAMB was further tested as a salvage treatment option for strains exhibiting FLC or MFG resistance. Indeed, in vitro profiles of the respective strains matched in vivo outcome, as for all strains increase in survival rates was observed after receiving 5 μg (15 mg/kg) of LAMB, the concentration resembling three times the dosage used in humans, post infection (Figure 1). Survival was significantly increased in all strains (p = 0.001 for CP37; p = 0.044 for CP30, p = 0.0767 for CP 179 and p = 0.042 for L48), except CP70 (p = 0.545) and CP207 (p = 0.359). Although survival rate did not significantly improve for larvae infected with CP70 and CP207, time to death was prolonged by even a single dose of LAMB. For example, LAMB treatment resulted in 40% survival versus only 20% at day 3 for CP 70, and could improve survival by 30% in CP207-infected larvae at day 3. Efficacy of antifungal treatment in the case of FLC and LAMB was shown to be concentration dependent, with 5 μg being the most efficient dose against ATCC 22019 infection, leading to a significantly (p = 0.027 for LAMB and p = 0.001 for FLC) positive outcome in comparison to lower (0.25 and 2.5 μg) concentrations (Figure S1). For four strains, ATCC 22019, CP 37, CP30, and CP179, also lower concentration of LAMB, 2.5 μg led to a statistical increase in survival (p = 0.046, 0.002, 0.018, or 0.017, respectively; data not shown).
Finally, recent studies have shown that C. parapsilosis isolates carrying Y132F in Erg11 are presumptively associated with a higher mortality rate [17,18]. Therefore, we compared the survival rates of larvae infected with clinical strains to the ATCC-control strain, and to each other, and could not detect statistically significant differences in survival rates, depending on the respective AA substitution (Figure S2).

4. Discussion

The emerging FLCR C. parapsilosis isolates causing severe clonal candidemia outbreaks in numerous countries [8,10,12,15,16,18] and the sporadic MDR isolates resistant against both azoles and micafungin [21,22] highlight the importance of establishing an efficacious alternative treatment at the time of outbreak. Beyond fluconazole therapeutic failure, recent studies have shown that C. parapsilosis isolates carrying Y132F in Erg11 are presumptively associated with a higher mortality rate [17,18]. Therefore, the current study evaluated (a) whether laboratory-based findings on azole (FLC) or echinocandin (MFG) resistance in C. parapsilosis imply therapeutic failure, (b) the efficacy of LAMB as a salvage treatment option using a G. mellonella model of invasive candidiasis, and (c) if isolates carrying Y132F are more virulent than WT and FLCR isolates carrying other ERG11 mutations. Our study highlights good correlation of in vitro and in vivo data for FLC and LAMB and the efficacy of LAMB as an alternative antifungal treatment for outbreak scenarios due to FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates. The utility of the model to assess echinocandin, or specifically MFG, efficacy needs to be further evaluated. Lastly, our Galleria model suggests that C. parapsilosis isolates harboring Y132F are not necessarily more virulent, which calls for murine models to more closely assess this observation.
FLC treatment clearly correlated with in vitro susceptibility profile of strains tested, meaning that all larvae infected with FLCR isolates showed therapeutic failure when treated with FLC. This observation may suggest that amino acid substitution found in Erg11p, including G307A and G458S, could confer azole resistance. G458S has been previously identified in an FLCR C. orthopsilosis isolate and proven to confer azole resistance [34]. This mutation corresponds to the G464S substitution in C. albicans, which was also proven to result in FLC resistance [35]. Studies evaluating various ERG11 mutations in C. albicans have found that substitution of Glycine 307 to Serine in tandem with other mutations can have a significant impact on azole resistance relative to a single mutation [35]. Therefore, we assume that G307A may have similar impact on azole resistance in FLCR C. paraspilosis isolates. Indeed, our recent studies suggest that FLCR C. parapsilosis harboring G307A in tandem with Y132F and/or G458S has been increasingly recovered during outbreaks [17,18]. Finally, the FLCR C. parapsilosis isolate with WT ERG11 was shown to harbor mutation in Tac1 (A352V) and Upc2 (A793S) [18]. Therefore, the overexpression of efflux pumps and ERG11 may be a potential reason behind the therapeutic failure to azole in absence of ERG11 mutation.
Reliability of the Galleria mellonella model for testing azoles has previously been shown for A. fumigatus. Forastiero et al. demonstrated a clear correlation of the in vitro and in vivo outcome for azole-resistant strains, and pharmacodynamic analysis revealed the area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio determined in hemolymph, comparable to previous murine studies. These data indicate that larvae are also a reliable model to test other azole agents [36]. Altogether, these data suggest G. mellonella as a reliable model to assess azole therapeutic failure for FLCR C. parapsilosis isolates and that FLC therapeutic failure can occur in FLCR C. parapsilosis WT isolates or with mutations in ERG11.
Failure of MFG to cure infected larvae regardless of the MFG susceptibility profiles of the isolates may have multifactorial reasons, for example, a fast clearance of the drug from the hemolymph or immunomodulatory effects. The latter have been observed by Fuchs et al. [37] who showed that MFG increased the number of hemocytes, the phagocytic cells in Galleria hemolymph, which led to protection against Staphylococcus aureus infections in this study. This could explain the finding that higher MFG concentrations caused larval death (unpublished results), potentially due to other unknown factors involving larval immune systems and suggests larvae are not the ideal model to study MFG efficacy, which is a certain drawback of this model system. Caspofungin, on the other hand, was shown to be effective in prolonging life in larvae infected with C. albicans in a previous study [38]. Of note, these in vivo observations do not undermine the inefficacy of candins to treat FLCR, fluconazole-susceptible (FLCS), and MDR isolates, but the incapability of G. melonella to assess the in vivo efficacy of echinocandins. As such, experiments involving murine models are required to more precisely evaluate the potency of candins against FLCR, FLCS, and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates.
In the next step, we used LAMB as a potential salvage treatment option, which resulted in positive correlation of in vitro susceptibility and treatment efficacy in vivo. Previous studies showed that LAMB is well tolerated by the larval host [22,32,33,39]. Therefore, LAMB can be considered as an efficacious and available salvage treatment when facing outbreaks caused by FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates. A hypothesis driven by antifungal susceptibility testing data from Ege University Hospital, where LAMB was used as a salvage treatment for FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates, and the fact that so far no AMB resistant isolates were described [17,18,22].
Finally, our Galleria model showed that C. parapsilosis isolates carrying Y132F are not more virulent compared to other strains, which is unlike the observations made in real-life [17,18] and murine models involving a higher number of Y132F and control (both FLCR and FLCS) C. parapsilosis isolates are necessary to rule out whether or not Y132F isolates are more virulent.
One limitation of the current study is that the role of single AA substitutions for FLC or MFG resistance was not assessed by precise genetic engineering, such as introducing single base mutation in the susceptible control strain. Only this could shed light on which AA exchange is responsible for the resistant phenotype, especially in those strains that bear more than one mutation. In addition, in this study we did not investigate the role of efflux pumps that could be the reason for FLC resistance of the isolate CP70.
Taken together, our study supports the use of LAMB as an efficacious alternative antifungal drug available to potentially achieve successful clinical outcomes in scenarios involving FLCR and MDR C. parapsilosis isolates. Nevertheless, murine studies are needed to underline our findings in an alternative model system. Moreover, our results reconsolidate the utility of G. mellonella as a reliable, alternative model to investigate the significance of in vitro azole resistance and if such phenotypes can be associated with therapeutic failure in real-life. The lack of higher virulence of C. parapsilosis isolates carrying Y132F warrants future studies to precisely define this counterintuitive observation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/6/4/377/s1, Figure S1: In vivo efficacy of (A) FLC, (B) LAMB and (C) MFG in larvae infected with the susceptible C. parapsilosis control strain ATCC22019. Figure S2: Kaplan–Meier survival curves of larvae injected with the respective clinical isolate (107 cells per larva), or ATCC22019 for comparison.

Author Contributions

Data data curation, U.B, L.S., C.H., and S.H.-P.; formal analysis, U.B.; funding acquisition, C.L.-F.; investigation, A.A. and C.L.-F.; methodology, U.B.; supervision, U.B.; writing—original draft, U.B. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, U.B., A.A., S.H.-P., D.S.P., and C.L.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Christian DopplerForschungsgesellschaft (CD-Labor Invasive Pilzinfektionen) to C.L.-F.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Camren Kandelbauer for excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

In the past five years, C. Lass-Flörl has received grant support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), MFF Tirol, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Schering Plough, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. She has been an advisor/consultant to Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Schering Plough. She has received travel/accommodation expenses from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Astellas, and Schering Plough and has been paid for talks on behalf of Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Astellas, and Schering Plough. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; Castanheira, M.; Jones, R.N. Twenty Years of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program: Results for Candida Species From 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Mokaddas, E.; Al-Banwan, K.; Alfouzan, W.; Al-Obaid, I.; Al-Obaid, K.; Asadzadeh, M.; Jeragh, A.; et al. Changing trends in epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of six bloodstream Candida species isolates over a 12-year period in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Xiao, M.; Chen, S.C.-A.; Kong, F.; Xu, X.-L.; Yan, L.; Kong, H.-S.; Fan, X.; Hou, X.; Cheng, J.-W.; Zhou, M.-L.; et al. Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Species Causing Candidemia in China: An Update From the CHIF-NET Study. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, S139–S147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kakeya, H.; Shibata, W.; Yamada, K.; Kaneko, Y. National Trends in the Japanese Distribution of Major Candida Species Causing Candidemia During 2003–2017: A Report by the. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 40. [Google Scholar]
  5. Puig-Asensio, M.; Padilla, B.; Garnacho-Montero, J.; Zaragoza, O.; Aguado, J.; Montejo, M.; Muñoz, P.; Ruiz-Camps, I.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Almirante, B. Epidemiology and predictive factors for early and late mortality in Candida bloodstream infections: A population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O245–O254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dimopoulos, G.; Velegraki, A.; Falagas, M.E. A 10-Year Survey of Antifungal Susceptibility of Candidemia Isolates from Intensive Care Unit Patients in Greece. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 53, 1242–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Spiliopoulou, A.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Bartzavali, C.; Lambropoulou, A.; Xaplanteri, P.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Marangos, M.; Spiliopoulou, I.; Christofidou, M. Increasing incidence of candidaemia and shifting epidemiology in favor of Candida non-albicans in a 9-year period (2009–2017) in a university Greek hospital. Infection 2019, 47, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Govender, N.P.; Patel, J.; Magobo, R.E.; Naicker, S.; Wadula, J.; Whitelaw, A.; Coovadia, Y.; Kularatne, R.; Govind, C.; Lockhart, S.R.; et al. Emergence of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis causing bloodstream infection: Results from laboratory-based sentinel surveillance in South Africa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1994–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nucci, M.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Alvarado-Matute, T.; Tiraboschi, I.N.; Cortes, J.; Zurita, J.; Guzman-Blanco, M.; Santolaya, M.E.; Thompson, L.; Sifuentes-Osornio, J.; et al. Epidemiology of Candidemia in Latin America: A Laboratory-Based Survey. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pinhati, H.M.S.; Casulari, L.A.; Souza, A.C.R.; Siqueira, R.A.; Damasceno, C.M.G.; Colombo, A.L. Outbreak of candidemia caused by fluconazole resistant Candida parapsilosis strains in an intensive care unit. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grossman, N.T.; Pham, C.D.; Cleveland, A.A.; Lockhart, S.R. Molecular Mechanisms of Fluconazole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis Isolates from a U.S. Surveillance System. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 59, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Choi, Y.J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yong, D.; Byun, J.-H.; Kim, T.S.; Chang, Y.S.; Choi, M.J.; Byeon, S.A.; Won, E.J.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Fluconazole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Bloodstream Isolates with Y132F Mutation in ERG11 Gene, South Korea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1768–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Thomaz, D.Y.; De Almeida, J.N.J.; Lima, G.M.E.; Nunes, M.D.O.; Camargo, C.H.; Grenfell, R.D.C.; Benard, G.; Del Negro, G.M.B. An Azole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Outbreak: Clonal Persistence in the Intensive Care Unit of a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singh, A.; Singh, P.K.; De Groot, T.; Kumar, A.; Mathur, P.; Tarai, B.; Sachdeva, N.; Upadhyaya, G.; Sarma, S.; Meis, J.F.; et al. Emergence of clonal fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates in a multicentre laboratory-based surveillance study in India. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1260–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Martini, C.; Torelli, R.; De Groot, T.; De Carolis, E.; Morandotti, G.A.; De Angelis, G.; Posteraro, B.; Meis, J.F.; Sanguinetti, M. Prevalence and Clonal Distribution of Azole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections in a Large Italian Hospital. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Magobo, R.E.; Lockhart, S.R.; Govender, N.P.; Wadula, J.; Rensburg, V.; Van Rensburg, C.J.; Whitelaw, A.; Zietsman, I.; Miller, N.; Smith, P.; et al. Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis strains with a Y132F substitution in the ERG11 gene causing invasive infections in a neonatal unit, South Africa. Mycoses 2020, 63, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arastehfar, A.; Hilmioğlu-Polat, S.; Daneshnia, F.; Pan, W.; Hafez, A.; Fang, W.; Liao, W.; Şahbudak-Bal, Z.; Metin, D.Y.; de Almeida, J.N., Jr.; et al. Clonal candidemia outbreak by Candida parapsilosis carrying Y132F in Turkey: Evolution of a persisting challenge. J. Fungi 2020. under review. [Google Scholar]
  18. Arastehfar, A.; Daneshnia, F.; Hilmioğlu-Polat, S.; Fang, W.; Yaşar, M.; Polat, F.; Yeşim Metin, D.; Rigole, P.; Coenye, T.; Ilkit, M.; et al. Frist report of candidemia clonal outbreak caused by emerging fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis isolates harboring Y132F and/or Y132F+K143R in Turkey. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01001-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Xiao, M.; Watts, M.R.; Wang, H.; Fan, X.; Kong, F.; Xu, Y.-C. Development of fluconazole resistance in a series of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a persistent candidemia patient with prolonged antifungal therapy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, J.H.; Suh, J.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.B.; Sohn, J.W.; Kim, M.J. 1698. Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candidemia Among Adult Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South Korea During an 8-Year Period. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S621–S622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arastehfar, A.; Daneshnia, F.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Hagen, F.; Mahmoudi, S.; Salehi, M.; Zarrinfar, H.; Namvar, Z.; Zareshahrabadi, Z.; Khodavaisy, S.; et al. Evaluation of Molecular Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles, and Molecular Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance of Iranian Candida parapsilosis Species Complex Blood Isolates. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arastehfar, A.; Daneshnia, F.; Hilmioglu-Polat, S.; Ilkit, M.; Yasar, M.; Polat, F.; Metin, D.Y.; Dokumcu, Ü.Z.; Pan, W.; Hagen, F.; et al. Genetically related micafungin-resistant Candida parapsilosis blood isolates harbouring novel mutation R658G in hotspot 1 of Fks1p: a new challenge? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arastehfar, A.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Daneshnia, F.F.; Ilkit, M.; Boekhout, T.; Gabaldón, T.; Perlin, D. The Quiet and Underappreciated Rise of Drug-Resistant Invasive Fungal Pathogens. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lepak, A.J.; Zhao, M.; Andes, D.R. Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Rezafungin (CD101) against Candida auris in the Neutropenic Mouse Invasive Candidiasis Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. James, D.A.; Koh, M.; Ostermann, M.; Cockwell, P. Reminder of important clinical lesson Optimal management of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections being treated with liposomal amphotericin B. Br. Med. J. 2020, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Almirante, B.; Rodríguez, D.; Rodríguez-Pardo, D. Antifungal Agents in Neonates. Pediatr. Drugs 2007, 9, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Choi, J.-S.; Yoon, Y.; Kwak, S.J.; Kim, Y.-J. Comparison of Candidemia in Patients in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Pediatric Patients and Big Data Analysis on Candidiasis and Candidemia in Korean Children. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jemel, S.; Guillot, J.; Kallel, K.; Botterel, F.; Dannaoui, E. Galleria mellonella for the Evaluation of Antifungal E ffi cacy against Medically Important Fungi, a Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Arastehfar, A.; Daneshnia, F.F.; Salehi, M.; Yasar, M.; Hoşbul, T.; Ilkit, M.; Pan, W.; Hagen, F.; Arslan, N.; Türk-Dağı, H.; et al. Low level of antifungal resistance of Candida glabrata blood isolates in Turkey: Fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentration and FKS mutations can predict therapeutic failure. Mycoses 2020, 63, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard, 3rd ed.; M27-A3; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Fourth Informational Supplement; CLSI document M27-S4; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Maurer, E.; Hörtnagl, C.; Lackner, M.; Grässle, D.; Naschberger, V.; Moser, P.; Segal, E.; Semis, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Binder, U. Galleria mellonella as a model system to study virulence potential of mucormycetes and evaluation of antifungal treatment. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Maurer, E.; Browne, N.; Surlis, C.; Jukic, E.; Moser, P.; Kavanagh, K.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Binder, U. Galleria mellonella as a host model to study Aspergillus terreus virulence and amphotericin B resistance. Virulence 2015, 6, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Morio, F.; Lombardi, L.; Binder, U.; Loge, C.; Robert, E.; Graessle, D.; Bodin, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Butler, G.; Le Pape, P. Precise genome editing using a CRISPR-Cas9 method highlights the role of CoERG11 amino acid substitutions in azole resistance in Candida orthopsilosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2230–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Flowers, S.A.; Colón, B.; Whaley, S.G.; Schuler, M.A.; Rogers, P.D. Contribution of Clinically Derived Mutations inERG11to Azole Resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 59, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Forastiero, A.; Bernal-Martínez, L.; Mellado, E.; Cendejas, E.; Gomez-Lopez, A. In vivo efficacy of voriconazole and posaconazole therapy in a novel invertebrate model of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 46, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fuchs, B.B.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Johnston, T.; Hendricks, G.L.; Li, G.; Rajamuthiah, R.; Mylonakis, E. Micafungin Elicits an Immunomodulatory Effect in Galleria mellonella and Mice. Mycopathologia 2015, 181, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Binder, U.; Aigner, M.; Risslegger, B.; Hörtnagl, C.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Lackner, M. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)-Phenomena in Candida albicans and Their Impact on the Diagnosis of Antifungal Resistance. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Blatzer, M.; Blum, G.; Jukic, E.; Posch, W.; Gruber, P.; Nagl, M.; Binder, U.; Maurer, E.; Sarg, B.; Lindner, H.; et al. Blocking Hsp70 Enhances the Efficiency of Amphotericin B Treatment against Resistant Aspergillus terreus Strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3778–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jof 06 00377 g001 550
Figure 1. Ability of antifungal drugs to improve survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with C. parapsilosis isolates. All isolates except ATCC22019 showed in vitro resistance against FLC. CP30, CP179, L48 were additionally classified resistant against VRC. CP207 is a multidrug resistant (MDR) isolate with MFG resistance in addition to azole resistance. Larvae were infected with 107 cells of the respective strain and treated groups received a single dose of antifungal (LAMB, FLC, or MFG) 2 h post infection (15 mg/kg). Control groups and untreated groups received the same volume of PBS (20 μL). * Indicates statistical difference (p < 0.05) according to log-rank (Mantel–Cox test) in comparison to the survival of larvae receiving no antifungal drug. LAMB: liposomal amphotericin B, FLC: fluconazole, MFG: micafungin, VRC: voriconazole.
Figure 1. Ability of antifungal drugs to improve survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with C. parapsilosis isolates. All isolates except ATCC22019 showed in vitro resistance against FLC. CP30, CP179, L48 were additionally classified resistant against VRC. CP207 is a multidrug resistant (MDR) isolate with MFG resistance in addition to azole resistance. Larvae were infected with 107 cells of the respective strain and treated groups received a single dose of antifungal (LAMB, FLC, or MFG) 2 h post infection (15 mg/kg). Control groups and untreated groups received the same volume of PBS (20 μL). * Indicates statistical difference (p < 0.05) according to log-rank (Mantel–Cox test) in comparison to the survival of larvae receiving no antifungal drug. LAMB: liposomal amphotericin B, FLC: fluconazole, MFG: micafungin, VRC: voriconazole.
Jof 06 00377 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical data and microbiological properties of six clinical strains included in this study.
Table 1. Clinical data and microbiological properties of six clinical strains included in this study.
StrainResistance PhenotypeAge/SexUnderlying ConditionsAPATOutcomeMIC (μg/mL)AA Exchanges in Hot Spot Regions
FLCVRCMFGAMBFks1-HS1Erg11
CP30FLCR, VRCR16 Y/MAplastic anemiaVRCVRCDied>3210.50.25 #WTY132F + K143R
CP37FLCR27 Y/FCardiomypathyFLCFLCDied>320.12510.5WTY132F
CP 179FLCR, VRCR3 M/FBowel perforationNoneMFGDied>3220.50.5WTY132F + G307A
L48FLCR, VRCR14 Y/FEpileptic seizure and malnutritionNoneAMB and FLCSurvived>64411WTG307A + G458S
CP70FLCR64 Y/MCardiovascular complicationsNoneCSPDied>320.12510.5WTWT
CP207MDR2 Y/MPneumonia, empyemaNoneFLCSurvived>320.5>80.5R658GY132F + K143R
# MIC reading was done at 48 h, as growth in the control was insufficient at 24 h; AP: antifungal prophylaxis; AT: antifungal therapy; FLC: fluconazole; VRC: voriconazole, MFG: micafungin; AMB: amphotericin B; MIC minimal inhibitory concentration; WT: wild-type; Y: year; M: months.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Binder, U.; Arastehfar, A.; Schnegg, L.; Hörtnagl, C.; Hilmioğlu-Polat, S.; Perlin, D.S.; Lass-Flörl, C. Efficacy of LAMB against Emerging Azole- and Multidrug-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates in the Galleria mellonella Model. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040377

AMA Style

Binder U, Arastehfar A, Schnegg L, Hörtnagl C, Hilmioğlu-Polat S, Perlin DS, Lass-Flörl C. Efficacy of LAMB against Emerging Azole- and Multidrug-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates in the Galleria mellonella Model. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(4):377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Binder, Ulrike, Amir Arastehfar, Lisa Schnegg, Caroline Hörtnagl, Suleyha Hilmioğlu-Polat, David S. Perlin, and Cornelia Lass-Flörl. 2020. "Efficacy of LAMB against Emerging Azole- and Multidrug-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates in the Galleria mellonella Model" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 4: 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040377

APA Style

Binder, U., Arastehfar, A., Schnegg, L., Hörtnagl, C., Hilmioğlu-Polat, S., Perlin, D. S., & Lass-Flörl, C. (2020). Efficacy of LAMB against Emerging Azole- and Multidrug-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates in the Galleria mellonella Model. Journal of Fungi, 6(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop