Next Article in Journal
Cytochrome P450 Complement May Contribute to Niche Adaptation in Serpula Wood-Decay Fungi
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Chromogenic Medium CHROMagarTM Candida Plus for Detection of Candida auris and Other Candida Species from Surveillance and Environmental Samples: A Multicenter Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 3
10.3390/jof8030282
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Endophytic Fungi Activate Leaf Antioxidant Defense System of Lane Late Navel Orange

by
Qiu-Shuang Li
1,
Ya-Chao Xie
2,
Mohammed Mahabubur Rahman
3,
Abeer Hashem
4,
Elsayed Fathi Abd_Allah
5 and
Qiang-Sheng Wu
1,*
1
College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
Yichang Citrus Science Institute, Yichang 443005, China
3
Department of Horticulture, City Operations, Park and Road Services, Edmonton, AB T6W 1A3, Canada
4
Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(3), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030282
Submission received: 15 January 2022 / Revised: 18 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 February 2022 / Published: 10 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Mycorrhizal Fungi Mediated Sustainable Crop Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and endophytic fungi collectively symbiose well with plants and, thus, stimulate plant growth; however, it is not clear whether field inoculation of the fungi enhances the resistance potential of plants, particularly in citrus. In the present study, we inoculated AM fungi (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Diversispora spurca, and D. versiformis) and endophytic fungi (Piriformospora indica) on an eight-year-old lane late navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb) trees grafted on Poncirus trifoliata in a field, and we analyzed the response of the leaf antioxidant defense system. Approximately 2 years after inoculation, the root fungal colonization rate and soil hyphal length significantly increased. Fungal inoculation significantly increased the activity of leaf antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase, and the content of non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as reduced ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione. As a result, fungi-inoculated plants maintained lower concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radicals and lower levels of membrane lipid peroxidation (according to malondialdehyde level) in leaves than uninoculated plants. Among them, inoculation of D. spurca and A. scrobiculata showed relatively higher effects in enhancing the antioxidant defense system than the other fungi. Furthermore, inoculation of D. spurca induced expressions of CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsPOD, CsCAT1, and CsPRR7; inoculation of A. scrobiculata and D. versiformis induced expressions of CsCAT1; CsCAT1 and CsPOD were also induced by inoculation of P. indica. All four inoculations almost upregulated expressions of CsFAD6. AM fungi had superior effects than endophytic fungi (e.g., P. indica). According to our findings, inoculation with beneficial fungi, specifically mycorrhizal fungus D. spurca, activated the antioxidant defense system of field citrus trees, thus, having potentially superior resistance in inoculated plants.

1. Introduction

Citrus is an important horticultural crop with a long life cycle, as is one of the most widely planted fruit trees in the world [1]. Citrus plants are mainly planted in mountains and hills, and they are extremely susceptible to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as high temperatures, droughts, cold, diseases, and pests, all of which reduce fruit quality and affect the development of the citrus industry [2,3]. The lane late navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb) is an important cultivar in the middle region of the Three Gorges Reservoir area in China [4]. The cultivar originates from the limb sport of the Washington navel orange in Australia and it was first documented in 1950 [5]. It has good productivity with high-quality fruit and vigorous growth [6]. Fresh fruits of the lane late navel orange are typically harvested from April to June in China, while other fruits are in low supply [7]. However, lane late navel orange trees in the field face various biotic and abiotic stresses [8]; thus, it is necessary to enhance the stress resistance of this variety.
It is well known that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are abundant in citrus rhizosphere [9]. AM fungi in the soil could establish a symbiotic relationship with many terrestrial plants, including citrus [10]. One the most important characteristics of this AM symbiosis is to help the host absorb nutrients and water that cannot be reached by the root, to enhance the resistance of the host plant to abiotic stress [11,12]. The AM symbiosis between AM fungi and host plants enhances the resistance of host plants to drought, salt stress, high temperature, nutrient stress, aluminum toxicity, and waterlogging stress by affecting their antioxidant enzyme defense systems [13,14,15,16]. Zhang et al. [17] observed an induced expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) genes in roots of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) seedlings under drought stress after inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae. In potted C. sinensis L. cv. Cara cara trees grafted on trifoliate orange, inoculation with Glomus mosseae dramatically increased leaf SOD and CAT activity during soil water deficit and rewatering [18]. These results show the important roles of AM fungi in enhancing the stress tolerance of plants by increasing the antioxidant enzyme defense system. However, all of these studies were carried out under potted conditions, and it is not clear whether similar mycorrhizal effects might be found in citrus plants grown in the field.
Exotic AM fungi have been applied experimentally to citrus trees in the field. Wu et al. [19] applied F. mosseae and three AM fungal mixtures into the rhizosphere of C. reticulata Blanco var. Ponkan cv. Jinshuigan grafted on the trifoliate orange. They observed that the two AM fungal treatments partially improved fruit quality and nutrient element content, whilst a mixture of AM fungi showed superior effects compared to single F. mosseae. However, AM fungi cannot be cultured in vitro, which seriously limits its application.
Endophytic fungi widely exist in the healthy tissues of living plants, and some coexisting endophytic fungi have developed a special relationship with their host plants in the long process of plant evolution, thus triggering a positive response from the hosts [20]. Piriformospora indica, an endophytic fungus, can be cultured in vitro and presents similar AM functions [21,22]. P. indica-colonized plants exhibited a better plant growth performance and higher stress resistance than uncolonized plants [23,24]. Early studies also revealed that P. indica regulated antioxidant enzymes or non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system to resist various stresses, to reduce the damage from reactive oxygen species (ROS) [25,26].
Since a large number of studies with potted plants have revealed the enhancement of the host antioxidant defense system by both AM fungi and P. indica, we hypothesized that field inoculation with AM fungi and P. indica also activated the host antioxidant defense system to enhance its resistance to stress. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of field inoculation with AM fungi and endophytic fungi on root fungal colonization, membrane lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzyme activity, non-enzymatic antioxidant concentration, and antioxidant enzyme gene expression of the lane late navel orange trees.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Inoculums

Three AM fungal strains, including Acaulospora scrobiculata Trappe (BGC HK02A), Diversispora spurca (C.M. Pfeiff., C. Walker and Bloss) C. Walker and A. Schüßler (BGC SD03A), and D. versiformis (P. Karst.) Oehl, G.A. Silva and Sieverd (BGC HUN02B), were provided by the Bank of Glomeromycota in China (BGC) (Beijing, China). Among them, A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, and D. versiformis were isolated and identified from the rhizosphere of Cercis chinensis from Hong Kong (China), Lycopersicon esculentum from Shouguang (Shandong, China), and Cynodon dactylon from Guiyang (Hunan, China), respectively. The identified spores were propagated under the conditions of trapping plants (white clover) for three months. The white clover plants were harvested, the aboveground parts were removed, and both the roots and growth substrates were collected as the mycorrhizal inoculum after natural air drying, where the roots were cut into 0.5-cm-long root segments. The inoculums contained spores (22 spores/g for A. scrobiculata; 19 spores/g for D. spurca; and 23 spores/g for D. versiformis), sporocarps, hyphae, and AM fungi-colonized root segments.
P. indica Sav. Verma, Aj. Varma, Rexer, G. Kost, and P. Franken was kindly presented by Professor Zhi-Hong Tian of Yangtze University (Jingzhou, China). The fungus was inoculated into potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for one week at 30 °C and activated on a new PDA for one week. Then the mycelium was inoculated on potato glucose liquid medium for 7 days under dark conditions, at 30 °C and 150 r/min. The spore suspension was collected and mixed with distilled water in the ratio of 1:20 as the fungal inoculum. The absorbance value was measured at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer, and the calculated concentration was 1.72 × 108 CFU/mL.

2.2. Field Inoculation of Fungi

On 10 May 2019, in a citrus orchard planted with equal height terraces, in Xiakou, Xingshan, Yichang, Hubei, China (31°12′ N, 110°79′ E), 8-year-old lane late navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb) trees grafted on trifoliate orange with the same growth vigor were selected for the fungal inoculations. The AM fungi-inoculated tree received 800 g of AM fungal inoculums, based on Wu et al. [19]. Within 1 m around the tree trunk, two ditches (400 g AM inoculum per ditch) were excavated, and then an 800 g mycorrhizal agent was evenly divided into two parts and applied into the two ditches, respectively. According to the results of Cheng et al. [10], the inoculum of P. indica was 9.25 g mycelium and 1.5-L spore suspensions of P. indica, which were evenly applied to the two ditches around the tree trunk. For non-fungal inoculated treatments, 800 g of autoclaved AM inoculums and 1.5-L autoclaved spore suspensions of P. indica were applied.

2.3. Experimental Design

The experiment was a one-factor experimental design consisting of five treatments in a randomized block design: (i) inoculation with A. scrobiculata; (ii) inoculation with D. spurca; (iii) inoculation with D. versiformis; (iv) inoculation with P. indica; (v) non-inoculation with exogenous fungi. Each treatment had four replicates (2 trees per replicate), with a total of 40 trees.

2.4. Sample Collection

Samples were taken about two years after inoculation of the AM fungi and P. indica. On 17 April 2021, the experiment ended, and the root, leaf, and soil samples were collected. Roots were collected from two ditches previously inoculated with AM fungi and endophytic fungi. In the inoculation ditch, fine roots were collected for analysis of root fungal colonization. The soil attached to the fine roots was gently shaken off and collected for analysis of hyphal length. A number of summer leaves from different directions were collected from each tree, and these leaves were immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen in the field. Samples were transported to the laboratory and stored at −80 °C for the analysis of biochemical variables and related gene expression levels.

2.5. Determination of Root Fungal Colonization and Soil Hyphal Length

Root fungal colonization was determined using the protocol proposed by Phillips and Hayman [27]. A segment taken from the middle part of the root was carefully washed, cut into 1-cm long root segments, cleared with 10% KOH solution at 95 °C for 1.5 h, followed by bleaching with 30% H2O2 solution, acidified with 0.1 mmol/L HCl solution, and stained with 0.05% trypan blue solution. The fungal colonization in roots was observed directly under biological microscopes, and the number of fungal colonization was counted. The root fungal colonization rate was calculated as the percentage of the number of fungi-colonized root segments versus the total number of root segments [28].
Hyphal length in the soil was measured by the method described by Bethlenfalvay and Ames [29]. A 0.5 g soil sample was incubated with 6 mL 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer followed through mixing. The 0.8 mL of the above solution was mixed with 0.4 mL 0.05% trypan blue solution at 70 °C for 20 min, cooled to room temperature, and finally examined under a microscope.

2.6. Determination of Leaf Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

The activity of SOD in leaves was measured by the procedure described by Wu [30]. The 0.5 g of fresh leaf samples were homogenized in 5 mL phosphate buffers (pH 7.8) and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min. The 1.5 mL mixture, including 50 μL of supernatants, 300 μL 130 mmol/L L-methionine, 300 μL 750 μmol/L nitrotetrazolium blue chloride, 300 mL 100 μmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt, 300 μL 20 μmol/L riboflavin, and 250 μL distilled water, was illuminated at 4000 Lux for 30 min, and the absorbance value was measured at 560 nm.
The activity of CAT in leaves was measured by the procedure outlined by Yang et al. [31]. The 0.3 g of fresh leaf sample was incubated in 7 mL 0.1 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) at 4 °C and centrifuged for 15 min at 4000× g. The supernatant was used as the CAT assay. The mixture of 0.2 mL supernatants, 0.1 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), and distilled water was incubated at 25 °C for 3 min, and then 0.3 mL 0.1 mol/L H2O2 was added. The absorbance at 240 nm was recorded every 1 min for a total of four times. One unit (U) of CAT activity was defined as a 0.01 decrease in the absorbance at 240 nm in 1 min.
The activity of peroxidase (POD) in leaves was assayed using the method described by Li et al. [32]. The 0.3 g fresh leaf sample was ground into homogenates with 8 mL 0.1 mmol/L phosphate buffers (pH 5.5) and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000× g. The mixture of 2.9 mL phosphate buffer (pH 5.5), 1.0 mL H2O2, 1.0 mL 0.05 mol/L guaiacol, and 0.1 mL supernatants was orderly placed into a 10 mL centrifugal tube, which was immediately incubated at 34 °C for 3 min. The absorbance of the mixture at 470 nm was determined. A change in the absorbance of 0.01 in 1 min was defined as one enzyme unit (U).
The activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in leaves was determined using the method described by Wu [30]. The 1.0 g fresh leaf sample was homogenized with 5 mL 50 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer containing 0.1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt at 4 °C and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000× g. The 0.1 mL supernatant was mixed with 0.1 mL 6 mmol/L ASC, and 1.7 mL 50 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer containing 0.1 mmol/L EDTA-Na2 and 0.1 mL 0.06% H2O2. The absorbance at 290 nm was immediately recorded every 40 s for a total of four times. One unit (U) of APX activity was defined as a 0.01 decrease in the absorbance at 290 nm in 1 min.

2.7. Determination of Leaf Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Concentration

Leaf ascorbic acid (ASC) concentrations were determined using the method described by Wu [30]. Briefly, a 1.0 g fresh leaf sample was homogenized with 5 mL 5% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min. After 1 min, the 0.2 mL supernatant was mixed with 0.2 mL 150 mmol/L NaH2PO4 and 0.2 mL of distilled water. Subsequently, 400 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid, 400 μL of 44% H3PO4 solution, 400 μL of 4% 2,2-dipyridine solution, and 200 mL of 3% ferric chloride solution were added, mixed well, and then held in a water bath at 37 °C for 1 h. The absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 390 nm.
Leaf glutathione (GSH) concentrations were assayed as per the protocol described by Chen and Wang [33]. The 1.0 g fresh leaf sample was homogenized with 5 mL 50 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer containing 0.1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt at 4 °C and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000× g. The 0.25 mL of supernatant was mixed with 2.6 mL 150 mmol/L monometallic sodium orthophosphate, 0.15 mL 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), which was held in a water bath at 30 °C for 5 min. The absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 412 nm.

2.8. Determination of Degree of Membrane Lipid Peroxidation

Malonaldehyde (MDA) was measured following the method described by Sudhakar et al. [34]. Fresh leaf samples (0.20 g) were homogenized with 5 mL 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min. The mixture, including 2 mL of supernatant and 2 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid, was incubated at 100 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min. The absorbance was recorded at 450, 532, and 600 nm, respectively. MDA concentrations were calculated according to their suggested formula.

2.9. Determination of Leaf ROS Levels

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations in leaves were determined using the method described by Velikova et al. [35]. The 0.1 g fresh sample was homogenized in 5 mL 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min. A 4 mL mixture was comprised of 1 mL 10 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 2 mL 1 mol/L KI, and 1 mL supernatant, and the absorbance of the mixture was recorded at 390 nm.
Superoxide anion (O2•−) concentrations in leaves were assayed following the protocol outlined by Wang and Luo [36]. Fresh leaf samples (0.15 g) were homogenized with 5 mL 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The 0.5 mL of supernatant was mixed with 0.5 mL 50 mmol/L phosphate buffers (pH 7.8) and 0.1 mL 10 mmol/L hydroxylamine chloride for 1 h at 25 °C. Subsequently, 1 mL 17 mmol/L sulfanilamide and 1 mL 7 mmol/L α-naphthylamine were added to the mixture at 25 °C for 20 min, and the absorbance was recorded at 530 nm.

2.10. Determination of Leaf Antioxidant Enzyme Gene Expressions

Total RNA from leaves of the lane late navel orange was extracted and purified using a TaKaRa MiniBEST plant RNA Kit (9769; Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s agreement. The RNA integrity was detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The Bio Photometer Plus 6132 ultra-micro spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) was used for spectrophotometric analysis, and the concentration and purity of extracted RNA were calculated by the A260/A280 ratio. The RNA was transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047A; Takara, Dalian, China). Five antioxidant enzyme protein genes (CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsCu/Zn-SOD, CsPOD and CsCAT1), a fatty acid desaturase (FAD) protein gene CsFAD6, and a circadian clock gene CsPRR7 were selected and obtained from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov accessed on 14 January 2022) and Citrus sinensis genome database (http://citrus.hzau.edu.cn, accessed on 14 January 2022). Primer Premier 5.0 software was used to design gene primer sequences (Table 1). The primers were synthesized by the Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and then qRT-PCR was carried out. The reverse transcribed cDNA was used as the template, using the CFX96 real time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and fluorescent dye method (2 × AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix, AiDLab, Beijing, China) were amplified by qRT-PCR. Each treatment had three biological replicates, along with three technical replicates/biological replicates. The β-actin was used as a reference gene. The 2−ΔΔCt method [37] was used to calculate the relative expression of genes, and the target genes with non-fungi inoculation were used as the control.

2.11. Data Analysis

The data were subjected to one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the SAS software (v 8.1), significant differences between the treatments was compared by the Duncan’s multiple range test at the level of 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) between variables were tested by the CORR procedure in the SAS software.

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Root Fungal Colonization and Soil Hyphal Length

The inoculation of exogenous AM fungi and endophytic fungi significantly increased the root fungal colonization rate of the lane late navel orange trees (Figure 1a). Compared with the non-inoculation, A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica significantly increased the root fungal colonization rate by 51.2%, 100.3%, 109.4%, and 69.5%, respectively. The hyphal length in the soil of the lane late navel orange trees also significantly increased (Figure 1b). Compared to the non-inoculation, A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica significantly increased the soil hyphal length by 66.3%, 124.4%, 117.5%, and 101.4%, respectively.

3.2. Changes in Leaf Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

Fungi-inoculated lane late navel orange trees recorded significantly higher activity of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX in leaves than non-inoculation control: 101.1%, 51.3%, 43.6%, and 37.7% higher CAT activity under A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica, respectively; 61.5%, 80.4%, 29.1%, and 29.7% higher SOD activity, respectively; 87.6%, 56.4%, 25.4%, and 29.5% higher POD activity and 56.6%, 34.2%, 48.4%, and 26.5% higher APX activity, respectively (Figure 2).

3.3. Changes in Sugar Concentrations of Leaves and Roots

Compared with non-inoculation treatment, inoculation with A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica significantly increased leaf ASC concentration by 70.2%, 73.5%, 61.9%, and 45.2%, respectively (Figure 3). Similarly, inoculated trees with A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica also recorded 46.9%, 36.2%, 14.7%, and 15.3% significantly higher leaf GSH concentration than non-inoculated trees, respectively (Figure 3).

3.4. Changes in Expression Levels of Leaf Antioxidant Enzyme Protein Genes

Compared with non-inoculation, inoculation with D. spurca induced the relative expression level of CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsPOD, and CsCAT1 genes by 2.58-fold, 5.64-fold, 3.31-fold, and 4.24-fold, respectively; inoculation of A. scrobiculata upregulated the relative expression level of CsCAT1 by 1.06-fold, but also inhibited the relative expression level of CsFe-SOD by 0.64-fold; inoculation of D. versiformis activated the relative expression level of CsCAT1 by 2.93-fold; and inoculation of P. indica caused the induced expression of CsCAT1 and CsPOD by 1.71-fold and 2.88-fold, respectively (Figure 4). Furthermore, among the four inoculation treatments, only D. spurca induced the expression level of CsPRR7 up to 2.29-fold, while the other three fungal treatments did not alter the expression of CsPRR7. All four treatments almost upregulated the relative expression of CsFAD6, which did not differ between non-inoculation and A. scrobiculata.

3.5. Changes in Leaf ROS Levels

Inoculation of A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica significantly reduced leaf H2O2 level by 50.4%, 49.2%, 5.9%, and 25.6%, respectively, as compared with non-inoculation (Figure 5). On the other hand, leaf O2•− concentration was significantly decreased by inoculation with A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, and D. versiformis by 28.2%, 28.8%, and 16.2%, respectively, but not P. indica.

3.6. Changes in Leaf MDA Concentration

Inoculated trees with A. scrobiculata, D. spurca, D. versiformis, and P. indica recorded 50.4%, 49.2%, 5.9%, and 25.6% significantly lower leaf MDA concentration, respectively (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

For plants with less root hairs, such as citrus, the colonization of AM fungi could efficiently help their roots absorb water and mineral nutrients [38], to improve the adaptability of host plants to stresses [39]. The fungal colonization rate reflects the affinity of fungi with host plants [40]. The water absorption rate of AM fungal hyphae was 2–7 times higher under drought than that of hyphae well-watered, indicating the importance of AM hyphae to plants under drought conditions [39]. The present results showed that non-inoculated trees exhibited root fungal colonization and rich soil hyphae, suggesting that some indigenous AM fungi existed in field citrus rhizosphere. The inoculation of AM fungi and endophytic fungi significantly increased the root fungal colonization rate and soil hyphal length of lane late navel orange trees. Hence, the four fungi could establish a good symbiotic relationship with the roots of lane late navel orange trees in the field, so as to help the host plant tolerate stresses. In C. reticulata Blanco var. Ponkan cv. Jinshuigan, field inoculation of AM fungi also stimulated root colonization, accompanied by improved fruit quality [19]. At the same time, the colonization by P. indica also enhanced the resistance of maize to drought [41]. Therefore, it concluded that field-inoculated citrus trees with AM fungi and endophytic fungi had higher root fungal colonization, associated with improved tree resistance and improved fruit quality.
When plants are subjected to stress, it leads to damage in membrane structure, and ROS, such as H2O2 and O2•− accumulates more, causing membrane lipid peroxidation [42,43]. In this study, the inoculated trees with AM fungi and endophytic fungi recorded lower H2O2 and O2•− levels in leaves than uninoculated trees, whilst A. scrobiculata and D. spurca showed lower ROS levels in leaves than D. versiformis and P. indica. The result was also observed in leaf MDA content after inoculation with AM fungi and endophytic fungi, indicating less membrane lipid peroxidation occurred in inoculated versus non-inoculated trees. Previous studies also reported lower ROS levels in leaves of Celtis caucasica inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis and F. mosseae under drought and in leaves of cotton inoculated with P. indica [44,45]. It is known that when AM fungi colonized into roots of the host plant, the efflux of H2O2 from roots was increased, while the reduced O2•− concentration in inoculated plants was associated with the upregulation of antioxidant enzyme gene expression in inoculated plants [46,47].
The production of ROS in plants increases rapidly when they are stressed, coupled with the increase in non-enzymatic antioxidant defense system to maintain metabolic activities of cells [48]. ASC and GSH, as important reducing agents in plants, can directly remove ROS [49]. The present study showed that inoculation of AM fungi and endophytic fungi increased leaf GSH and ASC concentration, among which A. scrobiculata and D. spurca showed more prominent effects than the other two fungi. A previous study in trifoliate orange also reported that inoculation with D. versiformis increased ASC and GSH concentration in leaves under ample water and drought stress conditions [50].
In addition, the antioxidant enzyme defense system of stressed plants is also activated simultaneously in response to the oxidative burst to alleviate cellular oxidative damage [51]. SOD converts O2•− to H2O2, which is then converted to H2O by CAT or POD. The three antioxidant enzymes thus scavenge ROS of plants and hold them in balance to alleviate cellular oxidative injury [52,53]. APX also assumes an important role in the ASC-GSH cycle [54]. In our study, leaves of lane late navel orange trees inoculated with AM fungi and endophytic fungi recorded significantly higher SOD, POD, CAT, and APX activities, and the inoculation of A. scrobiculata showed relatively better effects among the four fungal treatments. This is consistent with previous findings in studying the effect of AM fungal inoculation on drought tolerance in the potted trifoliate orange [55]. Furthermore, AM fungal (Glomus versiforme) inoculation was able to significantly increase SOD, POD, and CAT activity in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. variety Yunyan 87) plants under well-watered and drought conditions, thus reducing oxidative damage [51]. P. indica was found to improve the salt resistance of tomato, which was related to the increase in SOD, POD, and CAT activity [56]. In fact, P. indica was isolated from plant roots in the desert environment, having a good potential to resist adversity [21].
Stress significantly affects the expression of stress-responded genes in plants to deal with the stress change [57,58]. Inoculation with AM fungi scavenged ROS accumulated in stressed plants is associated with the regulation of relevant gene expression patterns, to some extent [58]. The present study showed that inoculation with AM fungi and endophytic fungi on lane late navel orange trees regulated the expression level of nine stress-responded genes, dependent on the type of fungi and genes. Among them, inoculation with D. spurca showed the upregulation of CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsPOD, and CsCAT1 expression levels by all fungal inoculations. Such results indicated that CsCAT1 was a fungi-specific gene, and D. spurca exhibited a higher antioxidant enzyme defense system in response to stresses. Ding et al. [59] also reported that, at 17:00, F. mosseae dramatically upregulated PtCAT1 expression in the trifoliate orange under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Ye et al. [60] also observed that inoculation with F. mosseae alleviated oxidative damage in salt-stressed watermelon through increasing the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes. Hui et al. [57] found that inoculation of P. indica also upregulated the expression of drought-related protein genes in tobacco plants under drought stress. In our study, P. indica only induced the expression of CsPOD and CsCAT1, implying a low capacity of the antioxidant enzyme defense system. In addition, CsPRR7 expression was increased only in the D. spurca-inoculated trees, implying that CsPRR7 was fungi-dependent. Our study also revealed that fungi-inoculated trees recorded higher expression levels of CsFAD6, suggesting that inoculated trees trigger more accumulation of unsaturated fatty acids, thus having a strong resistance potential to protect the integrity of the cell membrane [16,61].

5. Conclusions

To summarize, inoculation with AM fungi and P. indica into lane late navel orange trees in fields could increase root fungal colonization and soil hyphal length, along with higher antioxidant enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense systems, to reduce ROS accumulation, dependent on fungal species. As a result, inoculated trees recorded high resistance potential during tree growth. AM fungi represented superior effects than endophytic fungi (e.g., P. indica). Combined with stressed gene expressions and antioxidant defense system responses, D. spurca, among the four fungi used here, has a high potential value in lane late navel orange trees. Therefore, an AM fungus, D. spurca, can be appropriately introduced in future cultivation or the nursery stage of lane late navel orange trees to improve root fungal colonization and tree resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.-S.L. and Q.-S.W.; methodology, Q.-S.L.; data curation and statistical analysis, Q.-S.L., Y.-C.X. and Q.-S.W.; investigation, Q.-S.L. and Y.-C.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.-S.L.; writing—review and editing, M.M.R., A.H., E.F.A. and Q.-S.W.; supervision, Q.-S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000303) and the Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Action Project (Hubei Nongfa (2018) no. 1). The authors extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/356), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data supporting the findings of this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000303) and the Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Action Project (Hubei Nongfa (2018) no. 1). The authors extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/356), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ollitrault, P.; Curkb, F.; Krueger, R. Citrus taxonomy. In The Genus Citrus; Talon, M., Caruso, M., Fred, G., Gmitter, F.G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Elsevier: London, UK, 2020; pp. 57–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sina, N.; Morteza, G.; Abdoolnabi, B.; Assunta, B. Citrus industry: Phytoplasma-associated diseases and related challenges for Asia, America and Africa. Crop Prot. 2021, 152, 105822. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shafqat, W.; Naqvi, S.A.; Maqbool, R.; Haider, M.S.; Jaskani, M.J.; Khan, I.A. Climate Change and Citrus; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meng, L.L.; Liang, S.M.; Srivastava, A.K.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Zou, Y.N.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Easily extractable glomalin-related soil protein as foliar spray improves nutritional qualities of late ripening sweet oranges. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Legua, P.; Bellver, R.; Forner, J.B.; Giner, M.A. Trifoliata hybrids rootstocks for ‘Lane Late’ navel orange in Spain. Sci. Agric. 2011, 68, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pérez-Pérez, J.P.; Robles, J.M.; Botia, P. Influence of deficit irrigation in phase III of fruit growth on fruit quality in ‘lane late’ sweet orange. Agric. Water Manag. 2009, 96, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, L.G.; Jiang, Y.C.; Wang, Z.J.; Wu, L.M.; Tong, Z.; Xu, M.; Sun, Z.H. Effects of cold and fungicide treatments on fruit quality of Late navel orange from Three Gorges Reservior region during storage. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2017, 56, 4116–4118. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y.; Peng, D.L.; Luo, Q.W.; Liu, B.Y. Development status and suggestions of Xingshan late-ripening citrus industry in Hubei Province. China Fruit Indust. Inform. 2020, 37, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, P.; Shu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.J.; Liu, J.F.; Xia, R.X. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in red tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco) rootstock rhizospheric soils from hillside citrus orchards. Pedobiologia 2013, 56, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, X.F.; Xie, M.M.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Effects of field inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic fungi on fruit quality and soil properties of Newhall navel orange. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2022, 170, 104308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, S.; Zou, Y.N.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying enhanced drought tolerance in plants mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 809473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, R.C.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity and its relationship with soil properties in Camellia oleifera. Agriculture 2021, 11, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alotaibi, M.O.; Saleh, A.M.; Sobrinho, R.L.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; El-Sawah, A.M.; Mohammed, A.E.; AbdElgawad, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizae mitigate aluminum toxicity and regulate proline metabolism in plants grown in acidic soil. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Elgawad, H.A.; Xiong, Y.C.; Macovei, A.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Shaghaleh, H.; Hamoud, Y.A.; El-Sawah, A.M. Inoculation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and mycorrhiza confers tolerance to drought stress and improve seed yield and quality of soybean plant. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 2153–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ali, D.F.I.; Xiong, Y.C.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Ulhassan, Z.; Shaghaleh, H.; AbdElgawad, H.; Farooq, M.; et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bradyrhizobium under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Unravelling the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating the oxidative burst of plants under drought stress. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, F.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Arbuscular mycorrhizas modulate root polyamine metabolism to enhance drought tolerance of trifoliate orange. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 171, 103962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Q.S.; Xia, R.X. Effects of AM fungi on drought tolerance of citrus grafting seedling trifoliate orange/cara. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 16, 865–869. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, Q.S.; Gao, W.Q.; Srivastava, A.K.; Zhang, F.; Zou, Y.N. Nutrient acquisition and fruit quality of Ponkan mandarin in response to AMF inoculation. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 90, 1563–1567. [Google Scholar]
  20. Min, J.; Ling, C.; Xin, H.L.; Zheng, C.J.; Khalid, R.; Han, T.; Khalid, L.P. A friendly relationship between endophytic fungi and medicinal plants: A systematic review. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 906. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rai, M.; Varma, A. Arbuscular mycorrhiza-like biotechnological potential of Piriformospora indica, which promotes the growth of Adhatoda vasica Nees. Electron. J. Biotechn. 2005, 8, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, L.; Cao, J.L.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Piriformospora indica: A root endophytic fungus and its roles in plants. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 2020, 48, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gill, S.S.; Gill, R.; Trivedi, D.K.; Anjum, N.A.; Sharma, K.K.; Ansari, M.W.; Ansari, A.A.; Johri, A.K.; Prasad, R.; Pereira, E.; et al. Piriformospora indica: Potential and significance in plant stress tolerance. Front Microbiol. 2020, 7, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Meng, L.L.; Liu, R.C.; Yang, L.; Zou, Y.N.; Srivastava, A.K.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Giri, B.; Wu, Q.S. The change in fatty acids and sugars reveals the association between trifoliate orange and endophytic fungi. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hamilton, C.E.; Gundel, P.E.; Helander, M.; Saikkonen, K. Endophytic mediation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant activity in plants: A review. Fungal Divers. 2012, 54, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ansari, M.W.; Bains, G.; Shukla, A.; Pant, R.C.; Tuteja, N. Low temperature stress ethylene and not Fusarium might be responsible for mango malformation. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 69, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, L.; Zou, Y.N.; Tian, Z.H.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Effects of beneficial endophytic fungal inoculants on plant growth and nutrient absorption of trifoliate orange seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 277, 109815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bethlenfalvay, G.J.; Ames, R.N. Comparison of two methods for quantifying extraradical mycelium of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Q.S. Experimental Guideline in Plant Physiology; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, L.F.; Pang, J.; Peng, X.L.; Yan, J.J. Measurement of catalase activity in plants by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 364–366. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Z.G.; Gong, M. Improvement of determination of plant peroxidase activity by guaiacol method. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2008, 2, 323–324. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen, J.X.; Wang, X.F. Experimental Guideline in Plant Physiology; South China Polytechnic University Press: Guangzhou, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sudhakar, C.; Lakshmi, A.; Giridarakumar, S. Changes in the antioxidant enzymes efficacy in two high yielding genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.) under NaCl salinity. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, A.H.; Luo, G.H. Quantitative relation between superoxide anion radicals and the reation of hydroxylamine in plants. Plant Physiol. Commun. 1990, 26, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  37. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wu, Q.S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Zou, Y.N.; Malhotra, S.K. Mycorrhizas in citrus: Beyond soil fertility and plant nutrition. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 87, 427–443. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, F.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Quantitative estimation of water uptake by mycorrhizal extraradical hyphae in citrus under drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 229, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gange, A.C.; Ayres, R.L. On the relation between arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and plant benefit. Oikos 1999, 87, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, A.; Oelmüller, R. Drought stress responses in maize are diminished by Piriformospora indica. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, e1414121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rajkumar, M.; Bruno, L.B.; Banu, J.R. Alleviation of environmental stress in plants: The role of beneficial Pseudomonas spp. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 2017, 47, 372–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Drought stress enhances nutritional and bioactive compounds, phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity of Amaranthus leafy vegetable. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sepahvand, T.; Etemad, V.; Matinizadeh, M.; Shirvany, A.; Press, C.C. Symbiosis of AMF with growth modulation and antioxidant capacity of Caucasian Hackberry (Celtis caucasica L.) seedlings under drought stress. Central Asian J. Technol. Innov. 2021, 1, 20–35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dabral, S.; Yashaswee; Varma, A.; Choudhary, D.K.; Nath, M. Biopriming with Piriformospora indica ameliorates cadmium stress in rice by lowering oxidative stress and cell death in root cells. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2019, 186, 109741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, Y.M.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Alleviation of drought stress by mycorrhizas is related to increased root H2O2 efflux in trifoliate orange. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zou, Y.N.; Huang, Y.M.; Wu, Q.S.; He, X.H. Mycorrhiza-induced lower oxidative burst is related with higher antioxidant enzyme activities, net H2O2 effluxes, and Ca2+influxes in trifoliate orange roots under drought stress. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tsai, H.J.; Shao, K.H.; Chan, M.T.; Cheng, C.P.; Wang, S.J. Piriformospora indica symbiosis improves water stress tolerance of rice through regulating stomata behavior and ROS scavenging systems. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1722447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jangir, P.; Shekhawat, P.K.; Bishnoi, A.; Ram, H.; Soni, P. Role of Serendipita indica in enhancing drought tolerance in crops. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 116, 1101691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, Q.S.; Xia, R.X.; Zou, Y.N. Reactive oxygen metabolism in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings subjected to water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Begum, N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Zhang, L. AMF inoculation and phosphorus supplementation alleviates drought induced growth and photosynthetic decline in Nicotiana tabacum by up-regulating antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte accumulation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.M. Potassium up-regulates antioxidant metabolism and alleviates growth inhibition under water and osmotic stress in wheat (Triticumae stivum L.). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 1471–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xiong, B.Q.; Yu, D.; Yang, S.; Wan, Q. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on drought resistance of grape seedlings. China Fruits 2018, 2, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tian, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.L.; Duan, N.B.; Ding, H.F. Effects of aging treatment on seed vigor and ASA-GSH cycle in soybean. Plant Physiol. J. 2016, 52, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, H.H.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Effects of AMF on growth and active oxygen metabolism of potted Immature Poncirus aurantii seedlings under drought stress. South China Fruits 2018, 47, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  56. Abdelaziz, M.E.; Kim, D.; Ali, S.; Fedoroff, N.V.; Babili, S.A. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica enhances Arabidopsis thaliana growth and modulates Na+/K+ homeostasis under salt stress conditions. Plant Sci. 2017, 263, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hui, F.Q.; Liu, J.; Gao, Q.K.; Lou, B.G. Effects of Piriformospora indica on drought resistance of tobacco. Tob. Sci. 2017, 50, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  58. He, J.D.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Mycorrhizas enhance drought tolerance of trifoliate orange by enhancing activities and gene expression of antioxidant enzymes. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 262, 108745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ding, Y.E.; Zou, Y.N.; Kuča, K. Mycorrhizal fungi regulate daily rhythm of circadian clock in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Tree Physiol. 2021, tpab132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ye, L.; Zhao, X.; Bao, E.; Cao, K.; Zou, Z. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on watermelon growth, elemental uptake, antioxidant, and photosystem II activities and stress-response gene expressions under salinity-alkalinity stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Wu, Q.S.; He, J.D.; Srivastava, A.K.; Zou, Y.N.; Kuča, K. Mycorrhizas enhance drought tolerance of citrus by altering root fatty acid compositions and their saturation levels. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 1149–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 08 00282 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on the root fungal colonization rate (a) and soil hyphal length (b) of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly (p < 0.05) different if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 1. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on the root fungal colonization rate (a) and soil hyphal length (b) of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly (p < 0.05) different if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g001
Jof 08 00282 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and peroxidase (POD) activity of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly (p < 0.05) different if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 2. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and peroxidase (POD) activity of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly (p < 0.05) different if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g002
Jof 08 00282 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (ASC) concentration of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 3. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (ASC) concentration of the lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g003
Jof 08 00282 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on the relative expression level of leaf CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsPOD, CsCAT1, CsFAD6, and CsPRR7 in lane late navel orange tree. Data (means ± SD, n = 3) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 4. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on the relative expression level of leaf CsFe-SOD, CsMn-SOD, CsPOD, CsCAT1, CsFAD6, and CsPRR7 in lane late navel orange tree. Data (means ± SD, n = 3) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g004
Jof 08 00282 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf superoxide radical (O2•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations of lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 5. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf superoxide radical (O2•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations of lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g005
Jof 08 00282 g006 550
Figure 6. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations of lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Figure 6. The effect of inoculation with Acaulospora scrobiculata (As), Diversispora spurca (Ds), D. versiformis (Dv), and Piriformospora indica (Pi) on leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations of lane late navel orange trees. Data (means ± SD, n = 4) are significantly different (p < 0.05) if followed by different letters above the bars.
Jof 08 00282 g006
Table
Table 1. Specific primer sequences of genes used for qRT-PCR.
Table 1. Specific primer sequences of genes used for qRT-PCR.
Gene NameGene IDPrimer Sequences (5′→3′)
CsFe-SODCs7g19250F: AGTAAGGAGCGGCGAGTA
R: GTGGCTAATGCGGTGAAT
CsMn-SODCs7g29850F: GGCGAGCCACCACATAGT
R: CACCCTCAGCATTCATCTTTT
CsCu/Zn-SODCs3g12080F: GGACCAGCATGGACTACAAGACC
R: GGATGCCGGTGGAAGTGTTACC
CsPODCs1g18600F: GGCTCAACTTGTCCACCTC
R: TATCGTCGCCCTGTCTG
CsCAT1Cs3g27280F: TAACAGTGGAGGAGCGAACA
R: GGAGCCAGTGCTAAGGGT
CsFAD6Cs8g17450F: CTGCACGGAGATACAGCTTGGC
R: GGAATGTGAGGAGCCGTATGATGC
CsPRR7Cs6g03960.1F: TAGGAGCACACAAGAGCAGC
R: TTGTGGAACAGCTTCAGCCA
β-ActinCs1g05000F: CCGACCGTATGAGCAAGGAAA
R: TTCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA
Gene IDs are from the genome database of Citrus sinensis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.-S.; Xie, Y.-C.; Rahman, M.M.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.-S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Endophytic Fungi Activate Leaf Antioxidant Defense System of Lane Late Navel Orange. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030282

AMA Style

Li Q-S, Xie Y-C, Rahman MM, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Wu Q-S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Endophytic Fungi Activate Leaf Antioxidant Defense System of Lane Late Navel Orange. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(3):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qiu-Shuang, Ya-Chao Xie, Mohammed Mahabubur Rahman, Abeer Hashem, Elsayed Fathi Abd_Allah, and Qiang-Sheng Wu. 2022. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Endophytic Fungi Activate Leaf Antioxidant Defense System of Lane Late Navel Orange" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 3: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030282

APA Style

Li, Q. -S., Xie, Y. -C., Rahman, M. M., Hashem, A., Abd_Allah, E. F., & Wu, Q. -S. (2022). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Endophytic Fungi Activate Leaf Antioxidant Defense System of Lane Late Navel Orange. Journal of Fungi, 8(3), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop