Next Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Disruption of the pcz1 Gene and Its Impact on Growth, Development, and Penicillin Production in Penicillium rubens
Previous Article in Journal
Aspergillus terreus Antibody Serosurveillance in Tyrol: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study of a Healthy Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protein Disulfide Isomerase FgEps1 Is a Secreted Virulence Factor in Fusarium graminearum

State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(10), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101009
Submission received: 19 September 2023 / Revised: 7 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Pathogenesis and Disease Control)

Abstract

:
Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is a member of the thioredoxin (Trx) superfamily with important functions in cellular stability, ion uptake, and cellular differentiation. While PDI has been extensively studied in humans and animals, its role in fungi remains relatively unknown. In this study, the biological functions of FgEps1, a disulfide bond isomerase in the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum, were investigated. It was found that FgEps1 mutation affected nutritional growth, asexual and sexual reproduction, and stress tolerance. Additionally, its deletion resulted in reduced pathogenicity and impaired DON toxin biosynthesis. The involvement of FgEps1 in host infection was also confirmed, as its expression was detected during the infection period. Further investigation using a yeast signal peptide secretion system and transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana showed that FgEps1 suppressed the immune response of plants and promoted infection. These findings suggest that virulence factor FgEps1 plays a crucial role in growth, development, virulence, secondary metabolism, and host infection in F. graminearum.

1. Introduction

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major disease of small grain cereals worldwide and caused by Fusarium graminearum [1]. The pathogen typically invades the host through secondary spore infections, and its sexual reproduction produces perithecia that act as a primary source of infection in the following year [2]. This highly destructive fungus leads to unsaturated wheat seeds, significantly reduced germination and emergence rates, and varying degrees of yield reduction, sometimes exceeding 50% or resulting in direct crop failure [3,4]. Additionally, F. graminearum produces several mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA), which pose serious risks to the safety of humans and animals [5]. The biosynthesis of DON occurs through the activity of the Tri gene cluster [6]. The management of FHB remains challenging, primarily due to the lack of germplasm resources that are fully resistant or immune to F. graminearum. The current control method involves using azole fungicides during the flowering period in wheat, which is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, a better understanding of pathogen–host interaction may allow for novel engineered resistance to be designed in the host. To penetrate and colonize different plant tissues and cause disease, fungi must disable the plant’s defense mechanisms. The secretion of fungal proteins, known as effectors, is crucial for pathogenesis, as these proteins modulate plant immunity and facilitate infection [7]. Intracellular immune receptors can recognize specific fungi effectors or effector activities, inducing effector-triggered immunity (ETI). A range of effectors have been identified to date, most of which are small, secreted proteins [8]. The target genes of fungal effectors serve a variety of functions, including acting as transcription factors, protein kinases and compounds involved in plant defense, and metabolic pathways, as well as signaling [9,10,11,12]. Avr2, an effector protein from the tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum (syn. Passalora fulva), can decrease the pathogenicity and virulence of the pathogen to tomatoes when silenced [13,14].
In Ustilago maydis, the effector Tin2 is induced during the pre-infection period, hindering plant metabolism and thereby promoting pathogen invasion. A deficiency in Tin2 impairs the ability of U. maydis to extract nutrients from the host through vascular tissues [15]. During the secretion of effector proteins, protein modifications such as disulfide bonding, glycosylation, or acetylation play a crucial role in preventing protein degradation or structural variations. These modifications provide a stable structure for the polypeptide chains, enhancing thermodynamic stability and enabling better adaptation to the external environment.
Fungal effector proteins are rich in cysteine amino acids, and the covalent bonds between different cysteine amino acid residues (known as disulfide bonds) play a significant role in the stability of the correctly folded state of proteins [16]. The formation of disulfide bonds is catalyzed by a series of redox enzymes, and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is increasingly recognized for its catalytic role [17]. PDI is a member of the thioredoxin (Trx) superfamily and has various intracellular functions, such as contributing to cellular stabilization, ion uptake, and cellular differentiation [18]. Further research has revealed that PDI not only catalyzes the redox of protein disulfide bonds and heterodimerization [19] but also has molecular chaperone, Ca2+, and Cu2+ binding activities and participates in metabolism [20,21,22]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the whole genome sequence has revealed a total of five PDI genes, namely PDI1, EUG1, MPD1, MPD2, and EPS1 [23]. Studies have shown that overexpression of the other four genes, excluding PDI1, can partially rescue the growth deficiency resulting from PDI deletion [24,25]. PDI also plays a crucial role in host–pathogen interactions [26]. For instance, in Phytophthora parasitica, a conserved effector protein PpPDI1 induces cell necrosis in Nicotiana benthamiana. Mutants of PpPDI1 affect haustoria structure during infection, and PpPDI1-EGFP transformants enhance the formation of tumor-like structures and exhibit increased virulence against N. benthamiana [27]. In parasitic Leishmania major, the LmPDI gene shows high levels of expression during the infection stage of mice, raising the possibility that LmPDI expression affects the degree of infection and may be a pathogenic factor [28]. HsPDI is an effector protein that interferes with the interaction between the nematode species Heterodera schachtii and the host plant (sugar beet) by inhibiting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in the host [29]. In a recent study, MgPDI2, a typical PDI from the nematode species Meloidogyne graminicola, was found to be involved in the pathogenicity of M. graminicola. Furthermore, MgPDI2 induces cell death in N. benthamiana, indicating that it may play a vital role in the pathogenicity of M. graminicola [30]. In conclusion, PDI, as a conserved protein, plays an essential role in pathogen invasion and host–pathogen interactions. PDI has been extensively studied in humans and animals, and inhibition of PDI gene family members can inhibit the replication of several viruses, such as HIV. Nonspecific inhibition of PDI activity suppressed the PDI-mediated redox environment of plasma membranes and therefore interfered with HIV envelope protein-directed cell fusions. [31]. However, the role of PDI family members in the pathogenicity of F. graminearum remains largely unknown.
In this study, we detail the biological functions of FgEps1 in F. graminearum and present direct evidence of its involvement in its pathogenicity. The deletion of FgEps1 caused dense mycelium, impairment of asexual and sexual reproduction, and an enhanced susceptibility to various stress factors. Most notably, the deletion of FgEps1 led to decreased pathogenicity and reduced levels of the DON toxin in F. graminearum. Moreover, we explored the signal peptide secretion function of FgEps1 and assessed the expression of FgEps1 during the different stages of infection. Overexpression of FgEps1 in N. benthamiana resulted in an accumulation of callose and reactive oxygen species (ROS). These findings emphasize the critical role of FgEps1 in Fusarium graminearum infestation of wheat.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains, Culture Conditions, and Plant Materials

The wild-type F. graminearum strain PH-1 (NRRL 31084) was provided by the Wheat Pathogenic Fungal Surveillance and Disease Resistance Genetics Laboratory at Northwest A&F University for conservation. The fungus was cultured on solid potato dextrose agar medium (PDA), complete medium (CM), and trace element minimum medium (MM) at 25 °C. The wheat susceptible cultivar “Xiaoyan 22” was used as the susceptible cultivar. N. benthamiana was grown in a constant-temperature in vivo incubator with alternating dark/light cycles of 16/8 h at 23 ± 1 °C and 70% relative humidity.

2.2. Bioinformatics Analysis

The full-length base sequence of FgEps1 (FGSG_06174) was amplified from the cDNA of the wild-type PH-1 using specifically designed primers (listed in Table S1), and multiple sequence alignment was performed using DNAMAN (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA). Phylogenetic analysis of Eps1 proteins in different fungi was conducted using MEGA7 software (version 5.0, Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method and 1000 bootstrap replicates (Figure S4). The potential signal peptide was predicted using SignalP 5.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/index.php (accessed on 18 August 2022).

2.3. Knockout of Target Gene and Construction of Complemented Strains

The mutants were created using the double-joint (DJ) PCR approach [32] and polyethyleneglycol (PEG)-mediated protoplast transformation [33]. Three transformants were isolated by a single spore, and DNA was extracted for preliminary tests. The primers used to amplify the flanking sequences of the gene are listed in Table S1. The open reading frame (ORF) of FgEps1 was replaced with a hygromycin (hyg) resistance cassette (Figure S1). To confirm that the phenotype of FgEps1 was caused by the disruption of the gene, the DNA fragment carrying the native promoter and the ORF of FgEps1 was amplified using the primer pair listed in Table S1. The relative expression levels of FgEps1 and four pairs of specific primers (ID-F/HYC-R, ID-R/HYC-F, ID-F/ID-R, and HYC-F/HYC-R) at the transcriptional level were used to confirm that FgEps1 was successfully knocked out (Figure S2). When constructing complementary transformants, the complementary fragments were first amplified using characteristic primers (Table S1). The resulting PCR products were co-transformed with Xho-digested pYF11-GFP-Gen vector into yeast cells XK1-25 using a yeast transformation kit (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) to generate the recombined pYF11-FgEps1-GFP-Gen plasmid [34,35]. This plasmid was then extracted from the yeast XK1-25 transformant using a yeast plasmid extract kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and transferred into Escherichia coli strain DH5α to propagate the plasmids. Finally, the recombinant plasmid was transformed into the deletion mutant ΔFgEps1 to generate the complemented strains via random insertion. For selective growth of complemented transformants, PDA medium supplemented with G418 sulfate (100 mg/L) was used [36]. Deletion candidates and the complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C were identified through PCR assays with relevant primers.

2.4. Nutritional Growth Test

The activated wild-type strain PH-1, deletion mutant, and complemented strains were grown on PDA, CM, and MM solid medium, respectively, for 3 days. The average growth rate was calculated, and three biological replicates were performed. The sparseness and bifurcation of the marginal mycelial ends of each strain were observed under a 20× electron microscope. Additionally, spore production, the number of spore diaphragms, and spore germination rates were assessed for each strain, and three independent biological and technical replicates were conducted. To determine the sensitivity of each strain to stress factors (such as 1 M KCl, 1 M NaCl, and 15 mM H2O2), cell wall damaging agents (including 0.2 g/L Congo red, 0.75 g/L caffeine, and 0.02% SDS), metal cations (0.2 M MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5 M CaCl2, CuSO4·5H2O), and fungicides (0.25 ppm phenamacril and 0.25 ppm tebuconazole), activated strains were inoculated in the center of PDA plates containing varying agents and incubated at 25 °C for 3 days to calculate the inhibition rate. The mycelial growth inhibition rate (MGIR) was calculated according to the formula × 100, MGIR = [(N − C)/C] × 100, where C is the diameter of the control colonies, and N is the diameter of the treated colonies. Each experiment was repeated three times independently.

2.5. Sexual Reproduction

To test the sexual reproduction of the mutated and complemented strains, they were inoculated in the center of a carrot agar culture dish. Once the aerial mycelium had grown over the culture dish, the aerial mycelium was scraped off, and 500 μL of 2.5% Tween-20 solution was added. The dish was then incubated for 15 days at 25 °C, alternating between dark and light cycles every 12 h [37]. The ascospore shell and ascospore morphology were observed under the light microscope. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.6. Mycelium Penetration Test

The activated strains were inoculated on PDA medium lined with cellophane for 3 days at 25 °C. The differences in mycelial penetration of the different strains were observed, and the mycelia on the cellophane were imaged by a light microscope. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.7. Pathogenicity Observation and DON Toxin Expression Level Analysis

To analyze the pathogenicity on maize silk, we selected maize at the flowering stage. After removing the maize bracts, we used tweezers to cut the young maize silks to about 10 cm long. Every three roots were placed in a petri dish with sterile filter paper. A circular agar plug with hyphae with a diameter of 9 mm was inoculated in the middle of the young maize silk and incubated at 25 °C with 60% relative humidity for 4 days. The symptoms of the infected maize silk were observed and recorded after 4 days. For the pathogenicity analysis of field wheat spikes, the wild-type strain PH-1, deletion mutant, and complemented strains were cultured on carboxymethylcellulose sodium medium (CMC) for 3 days. The resulting cultures were filtered and centrifuged, and the concentration of conidia was adjusted to 1 × 105 conidium /mL using sterile water. The conidial suspension of each strain was point inoculated in the middle of the wheat spikes using a pipette, and 25 wheat spikes were inoculated with each strain at 20 μL each time. After 15 days, the statistics of disease index was produced (disease index = prevalence × average severity × 100%; average severity = Σ (severity × number of diseased spikes)/total number of diseased spikes investigated). To quantify DON production, infected spikelets of each strain were collected from inoculated wheat heads in the field, and the yield of the DON toxin was determined using the catalytic toxin ELISA kit (Jiangsu Enzyme Immunity Industry Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China).

2.8. Tri Gene Cluster Expression Level

In order to analyze the expression level of the Tri gene cluster encoding DON synthesis-related enzymes in strain ΔFgEps1, strain PH-1 was used as a control. According to the method of inoculation of wheat spikes in the field, we inoculated 10 wheat spikes and threshed the diseased spikes after 15 days and then ground them into a fine powder using liquid nitrogen. The total RNA was extracted from each RNA sample using RNAiso reagent (TaKaRa Co., Dalian, China). One microgram of each RNA sample was reverse transcribed using a HiScriptIIQRT Super Mix qPCR kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The expression level of each gene was determined by quantitative real-time PCR using the primers listed in Table S1 (primers that start with “RT”). The actin gene was used as an internal reference to normalize the expression levels of the target genes. Each experiment was repeated three times independently to ensure reproducibility.

2.9. Yeast Signal Peptide Secretion

To insert the predicted sequence of FgEps1 signal peptide into the linearized PSUC2t7M13ori (pSUC2) vector for recombination, the pSUC2 vector that contains the sucrose invertase SUC2 gene lacking the start codon and signal peptide [38] was used. The signal peptide sequence of Avr1b was also inserted into the linearized pSUC2 vector for recombination and served as a positive control, while the pSUC2 empty vector was used as a negative control. The resulting pSUC2-Eps1sp vector was then transformed into the yeast strain YYK12. The transformed colonies were screened on CMD-W medium (0.67% YNB, yeast nitrogen base without amino acids; 0.075% tryptophan dropout supplement; 0.1% glucose; 2% sucrose; 2% bacto agar). Positive transformants were selected and cultured on YPRAA medium (2% peptone; 2% raffinose; 2% bacto agar; 2 mg/mL antimycin A; 1% yeast extract) lacking tryptophan. A small number of transformed colonies were then screened on 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) medium to observe if a red color could be induced in TTC, which would indicate that the FgEps1 signal peptide could direct the secretion of Suc2 to the yeast cell wall.

2.10. Induced Tobacco Cell Necrosis Experiment and Callose, ROS Determination

To express the full-length coding sequence of FgEps1 (containing the signal peptide sequence), specific primers (pBin-F/R) were used to insert it into the pBin vector. The resulting construct was then transiently expressed in N. benthamiana using Agrobacterium-mediated (GV3101) transient expression. For co-expression experiments, pBin-Bax and pBin-Eps1 were injected into the leaves of N. benthamiana at a 1:1 ratio for co-expression, with a concentration of OD = 600 (optical density). Negative and positive controls were also used, including pBin-GFP and pBin-Bax, respectively. After 2–3 days, the leaves of N. benthamiana were observed and decolorized using 100% ethanol. Ion leakage from leaf disks was measured to assay cell death. Six leaf disks (1 cm diameter) from agroinfiltrated areas were taken and floated in 5 mL distilled water for 5 h, and the conductivity of the bathing solution was measured using a conductivity meter (FE32 FiveEasy; Mettler-Toledo, Shanghai, China) to yield “value A.” Then the leaf disks were boiled in the bathing solution in sealed tubes for 20 min. When the solution cooled to RT, the conductivity was measured to gain “value B.” Ion leakage was calculated as percent leakage, that is, (value A/value B) × 100. Assays were repeated three times. One gram of each treated leaf was collected, and the levels of callose and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured using a kit (Comin Biotech., Suzhou, China). Each experiment was repeated three times for statistical reliability.

2.11. Expression Level of FgEps1 during the Period of Infection

A 20 μL (1 × 105 conidium/mL) conidial suspension of the wild-type strain PH-1 was inoculated into a single floret of wheat spikes using a pipet at anthesis. The inoculated spikelets were sampled every 24 h for 5 consecutive days, and the samples were ground with liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted from the samples using a kit (RNAiso reagent (TaKaRa Co., Dalian, China)) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using the HiScriptII QRT Super Mix qPCR kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was then performed to quantify the level of FgEps1 expression in F. graminearum-infected wheat. Actin was used as an internal reference, and all primers are listed in Table S1 (Ex-Eps1-F/R). Roche’s LightCycle 480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used for the real-time PCR. Three biological replicates were performed for statistical analysis of the results.

2.12. Statistical Analyses

To analyze the statistical differences in pairwise comparisons, Student’s t-test was used. For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the one-way ANOVA method, and the least significant difference (LSD) test was used to determine significance of difference. All statistical analyses were performed using the R program version 4.1.1.

3. Results

3.1. The Deletion of FgEps1 Has an Effect on the Density and Penetration of Mycelium

To investigate the role of FgEps1 in the nutritional growth and penetration ability of F. graminearum, we inoculated wild-type strain PH-1, deletion mutant strain ΔFgEps1, and complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C on PDA, CM, and MM agar medium at 25 °C for 3 days, respectively. It was found that deletion of FgEps1 did not affect the nutritional growth of the strain compared to the wild-type strain PH-1 and complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C. However, the deletion of FgEps1 did cause the marginal mycelium to become denser and more curled, and the divergence angle at the end of the mycelia became smaller (Figure 1A). The growth rates of the different strains are shown in Figure 1B. To simulate the penetration of the ΔFgEps1 strain into the host plants, we inoculated the activated wild-type strain PH-1, deletion mutant ΔFgEps1, and complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C in the center of PDA medium lined with sterile cellophane and incubated them at 25 °C for 3 days. It was found that the mycelium of the ΔFgEps1 strain was much denser and produced less pigment than the other strains. The absence of FgEps1 was observed to have a reduced penetration ability of F. graminearum mycelium to some extent on the uncovered cellophane (Figure 1C). In summary, these results suggest that FgEps1 is involved in the mycelial morphology or phenotype of F. graminearum.

3.2. FgEps1 Deficiency Can Severely Impede the Asexual and Sexual Reproduction of F. graminearum

To investigate the role of FgEps1 in asexual and sexual reproduction of F. graminearum, the strains were induced to produce asexual conidia in CMC liquid medium and stained with CFW to measure the conidia produced after 3 days. The mutant strain ΔFgEps1 produced significantly fewer conidia than the wild-type strain PH-1, with only 8.33% of the conidial production of PH-1, and this phenotype was restored in the complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C (Figure 2A,B). The absence of FgEps1 did not significantly affect the number of conidial septa (Figure S3). To test the role of FgEps1 in spore germination, spore suspension was enriched, and then spore germination was induced in YEPD liquid medium. The spore germination rate of the deletion mutant ΔFgEps1 was significantly inhibited compared to WT strain PH-1 and the complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C after 2, 4, and 8 h after incubation, while there was no difference in spore germination rates between WT strain PH-1 and the complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C (Figure 2C).
To test the role of ΔFgEps1 in sexual reproduction, the strains were inoculated on carrot agar medium and induced with alternating dark/light every 12 h for 30 days. The mediums inoculated with wild-type strain PH-1 and the complemented strain ΔFgEps1-C were covered with purple-black perithecia, while the medium inoculated with strain ΔFgEps1 produced no perithecia (Figure 2D,E). Taken together, these results indicate that the deletion of FgEps1 significantly affects asexual and sexual reproduction, as well as spore germination rates.

3.3. Sensitivity of ΔFgEps1 to Different Stress Factors

Copper ions are important micronutrients for normal plant growth and response to adversity, while H2O2 accumulation is an important indicator of plant immunity. To investigate the role of FgEps1 in environmental stress responses, we tested the sensitivity of the ΔFgEps1 strain to various stress factors. It was found that the ΔFgEps1 strain showed increased sensitivity to 0.25 ppm phenamacril, 0.2 g/L Congo red, 0.02% SDS, 1 M KCl, 1 M NaCl, 0.2 M MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5 M CaCl2, and 0.75 g/L caffeine, while the ΔFgEps1 strain showed increased tolerance to 15 mM H2O2 and CuSO4·5H2O (Figure 3A,B). Based on our findings, we speculate that FgEps1 may play a role in the defense of F. graminearum against plant immunity.

3.4. FgEps1 Has an Essential Contribution in the Pathogenesis of F. graminearum

It was observed that the maize filament spots inoculated with PH-1 and ΔFgEps1-C had spread throughout the maize silk, while those inoculated with ΔFgEps1 showed restrained spots without expansion (Figure 4A). The length of the spots is shown in Figure 4C. Based on the indoor test, a field assay for pathogenicity was conducted. We inoculated the conidia suspension in the middle of wheat heads at the flowering stage and found that scab symptoms appeared first on wheat spikelets inoculated with PH-1 and ΔFgEps1-C, which spread rapidly to the entire spikelets 15 days after inoculation. In contrast, mycelium in the glumes inoculated with ΔFgEps1 did not spread to the whole spikelet stem (Figure 4B). We subsequently sampled the inoculated wheat to calculate the disease index and average severity (Figure 4D). It was found that the disease index and average severity of wheat inoculated with the mutant were significantly lower than those of PH-1 and ΔFgEps1-C. These results indicate that the deletion of FgEps1 contributes to the reduction of pathogenicity. In summary, our results suggest that FgEps1 plays an important role in the pathogenicity of F. graminearum and may be a potential target for controlling wheat scab disease.

3.5. FgEps1 Was Involved in DON Biosynthesis and Full Virulence in F. graminearum

The results showed that all 12 Tri genes (Tri1, Tri2, Tri4, Tri5, Tri6, Tri7, Tri8, Tri10, Tri11, Tri12, Tri13, Tri14) in the ΔFgEps1 strain showed different degrees of low expression level compared to PH-1 (Figure 5A). Next, we measured the biosynthetic production of DON toxin in diseased wheat spikes inoculated with strain PH-1, FgEps1-C, and ΔFgEps1. As expected, the wheat spikes inoculated with ΔFgEps1 produced less DON toxin than those inoculated with PH-1 and FgEps1-C (Figure 5B). Furthermore, we measured the expression level of FgEps1 during the infection period of F. graminearum in wild type PH-1 and found that the expression level of FgEps1 increased steeply at day 3 and then decreased (Figure 5C). These results suggest that FgEps1 affects the invasion of F. graminearum and the synthesis of DON toxin in wheat. In conclusion, our findings suggest that FgEps1 may be a potential target for controlling FHB by regulating the expression of the Tri gene cluster and inhibiting DON toxin synthesis.

3.6. The Signal Peptide of FgEps1 Has a Secretory Function, and Overexpression Can Suppress the Immune Response in Plants

Signal peptides are specific elements of secreted proteins that play an important role in the activity of fungal invasion of hosts. The Signal Peptide Secretion Prediction Tool (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP-5.0 (accessed on 18 August 2022) was used to predict the signal peptide of FgEps1 (Figure 6A). Specific primers were designed to amplify the full length of the signal peptide (amino acids 1–18), and pSUC2-FgEps1sp was constructed to confirm whether the N-terminal signal peptide of FgEps1 has a secretory function. The sucrose-converting enzyme secretion system of strain YTK12 was used for this purpose [39]. As indicated in Figure 6C, strain YTK12 could not grow on CMD-W medium lacking tryptophan and could grow on YPRAA only with cottonseed sugar as a carbon source. However, the transformed strains, where the recombinant plasmid replaced the yeast sucrose invertase signal peptide with the target signal peptide Fgeps1sp, were able to utilize the raffinose on YPRAA and grow on it. Additionally, these strains induced a TTC red reaction, demonstrating that the N-terminal signal peptide of FgEps1 had a secretory function. To determine the functions of FgEps1, the full-length coding sequence was inserted into the pBin-GFP vector. Using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration system, FgEps1 was co-injected with the cell necrosis-inducing gene Bax into N. benthamiana leaves. It was found that Bax-triggered N. benthamiana cell death was inhibited by transient expression of FgEps1 (Figure 6B), which was confirmed by quantification of ion leakage (Figure S5). At 48 h, H2O2 and callose accumulations in N. benthamiana leaves were measured. FgEps1 produced significantly less H2O2 and callose than Bax in the control groups. The co-injection also inhibited the accumulation of H2O2 and callose caused by Bax (Figure 6D,E).

4. Discussion

Protein modifications, such as disulfide bonds, glycosylation, or acetylation, play a crucial role in the secretion of proteins and peptides by pathogens to avoid protein degradation or structural changes. Evidence supports that the formation of disulfide bonds is catalyzed by PDI oxidoreductase [19]. With the continuous development of technology and research, the versatility of PDI family genes has been gradually explored and expanded. Related studies indicate that PDI and protein-like protein disulfide isomerase (PDIL) act as molecular chaperones and also exhibit certain anti-molecular chaperone activities [21,40]. We infer that fungal homologs also retain this function. We speculate that FgEps1 acts as a cell chaperone during infection and participates in protein transport and localization. [31]. However, so far, studies on the functions of PDI in vivo have mainly focused on plants and medicine, and few studies on plant pathogenic fungi have been reported. Therefore, this study explored the gene functions of FgEps1, a member of the PDI family in F. graminearum, and identified direct evidence for its involvement in the pathogenicity mechanism of F. graminearum.
In S. cerevisiae, both wild-type and ΔScEps1 secrete amyloid-prone cystatin and unstable mutant C94A lysozyme. The secretion level of amyloid-prone cystatin in ΔScEps1 is much higher than that in wild-type strains, while the secretion of disulfide-destroyed unstable mutant C94A lysozyme is greatly increased in ΔScEps1. However, the secretion of unstable mutant C94A lysozyme and amyloid-prone cystatin in ΔScEps1 does not maintain their specific activities [41]. Our homology BLAST search indicated that FgEps1 is a single-copy gene that encodes a disulfide isomerase Eps1 in F. graminearum, containing a signal peptide, a low complexity region, and three thioredoxin-related protein domains. Previous studies have shown that the oxidase activity of PDI in yeast is crucial for growth and development [42,43]. We obtained three FgEps1 deletion mutants with consistent phenotypes and selected one of them for biological phenotype experiments (Figure S6). Interestingly, our study found that the deletion of FgEps1 did not affect the vegetative growth of F. graminearum (Figure 1B) but affected the growth morphology of marginal hyphae (Figure 1A). Therefore, we speculate that FgEps1 plays a dual function, participating not only in the infection process but also in the fungus’s growth and development. The invasion of pathogens into the host is determined by the ability of the mycelium or infection structures to penetrate the host plant. Through the cellophane penetration simulation infection process, we found that the deletion of FgEps1 could reduce the penetration ability of mycelium to some extent (Figure 1C). Studies on related species have shown that F. oxysporum loses the ability to penetrate cellophane after mutating the OCHI gene and that STE12 gene mutation leads to a reduction in pathogenicity and the inability to form an infection structure on wheat heads in F. graminearum [44,45]. Thus, we speculated that the decreased penetration ability of ΔFgEps1 might affect F. graminearum’s colonization. Surprisingly, the deletion of FgEps1 hindered F. graminearum’s colonization in the wheat spikes pathogenicity test (Figure 4B), which was consistent with our hypothesis. However, it only indicated that FgEps1 was one factor contributing to the virulence defect of F. graminearum. Further investigation is necessary to fully elucidate FgEps1 and other factors’ roles in F. graminearum’s virulence.
One possible factor contributing to the reduced virulence of ΔFgEps1 may be defects in DON toxin biosynthesis. We confirmed this by observing that FgEps1 was required for full virulence and DON biosynthesis during F. graminearum infection and in FgEps1-infected wheat spikes (Figure 5B). Additionally, the low expression of 12 Tri genes encoding DON biosynthesis (Figure 5A) could also explain the decrease in DON toxin production. F. graminearum typically invades the host through secondary infection, so we tested the sexual and asexual reproduction of ΔFgEps1 and found that ΔFgEps1 significantly reduced the number of conidia (Figure 3B), while the germination rate of spores was also affected (Figure 2C). Under natural conditions, the primary infection source of FHB typically comes from ascospores produced on various residues after the overwintering of F. graminearum. We observed that the ΔFgEps1 strain did not produce sexual perithecia and ascospores (Figure 2D,E), suggesting that FgEps1 played a crucial role in the sexual reproduction of F. graminearum and that deletion of FgEps1 may result in the loss of sexual reproduction ability. The possibility that F. graminearum lacking FgEps1 would greatly reduce its ability to re-infect the host in subsequent years remains to be verified. To further explore the role of FgEps1, we observed the growth and development ofΔFgEps1 for three days and calculated the inhibition rate (Figure 3A,B) under different stress factors. Our results showed that the knockout of FgEps1 increased the sensitivity of F. graminearum to most stress factors but increased tolerance to H2O2 and CuSO4·5H2O. Copper ions are crucial trace elements for plant growth and resistance to adversity, and the accumulation of H2O2 is an essential indicator of a plant’s immune status. Based on our experimental findings, we hypothesize that FgEps1 plays a role in F. graminearum’s ability to resist plant immunity and exercise Cu2+ binding activity with PDI. During the coevolution of plants and pathogens, a complex interaction relationship develops. Plants have evolved various recognition and resistance mechanisms to organize and limit pathogen infection, while pathogens have developed diverse pathogenic mechanisms to avoid or overcome plant resistance mechanisms [37]. So far, we have only confirmed that FgEps1 is involved in the pathogenesis of F. graminearum but have not yet analyzed its mode of action in this process. Plant pathogens secrete virulence factors into host cells to promote self-infection and colonization [46]. We verified the signal peptide secretion function of FgEps1 using yeast (Figure 6C). Transient expression of secretory protein in N. benthamiana is a common method to identify its functions. Non-toxic proteins that are recognized by plants can induce a hypersensitive response (HR) leading to necrosis of plant leaves, while some proteins can inhibit the HR response in plants. Interestingly, our experiment showed that transient expression of FgEps1 inhibited Bax-induced cell death in N. benthamiana cells (Figure 6B), indicating that FgEps1 may be involved in suppressing the host’s basic defense response. F. graminearum is a hemi-biotrophic vegetative fungus that does not entirely rely on suppressing plant HR response for infection; still, pathogen infection can cause plant immunity, suppress the HR response, and help F. graminearum to better infect. Callose accumulation is a typical feature of the PTI (pattern-triggered immunity) response [47], and the ETI (effector-triggered immunity) response causes the burst of ROS (reactive oxygen species) [48]. To further clarify whether FgEps1 regulates the basic immune response of host cells, we measured the accumulation of H2O2 and callose in the model plant N. benthamiana and found that H2O2 and callose produced by FgEps1 were significantly reduced compared to Bax (Figure 6D,E). Although the plant defense system is conserved in monocots and dicots, it is meaningful to determine whether FgEps1 can inhibit the immune response of F. graminearum in host plants such as wheat.
In summary, our study found that FgEps1 plays a crucial role in the various aspects of the life cycle of F. graminearum, including asexual growth, sexual reproduction, asexual reproduction, pathogenicity, and DON toxin synthesis. Additionally, our experiments with N. benthamiana suggest that FgEps1 may have a function in inhibiting host immunity. However, further research is necessary to fully understand how FgEps1 acts as a secretory virulence factor to regulate the host immune response. This research has the potential to reveal the pathogenic mechanism of F. graminearum, leading to the development of new strategies for the prevention and treatment of FHB.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9101009/s1: Table S1: PCR primers used in this study. Figure S1: A schematic diagram of homologous recombination to construct a deletion mutant of FgEps1. Figure S2: Validation of the ΔFgEps1 deletion mutant by PCR. (A) A schematic diagram of ΔFgEps1 deletion mutant primer validation is presented. (B) Lanes 1–4 show the identification of ID-F/HYC-R, with lane 4 being the wild type; lanes 5–8 show the identification of ID-R/HYC-F, with lane 8 being the wild type; lanes 9–12 show the identification of ID-F/ID-R, with lane 12 being the wild type; lanes 13–16 show the identification of HYC-F/HYC-R, with lane 16 being the wild type. (C) The relative gene expression of wild type and three. Figure S3: Statistics on the number of septa in the conidia produced by each strain. Figure S4: Phylogenetic tree of Eps1 proteins in different fungi. Figure S5: Quantification of cell death by measuring electrolyte leakage 3 and 5 dpa. Means and SEs were calculated from three independent experiments. The statistical analyses were performed with Student’s t-test. Bars indicate ± SE. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Figure S6: The colony morphology of three ΔFgEps1 mutant transformants under different kinds of pressure. ΔFgEps1 transformants at the transcriptional level.

Author Contributions

Data curation, K.L.; formal analysis, X.W., Y.R., Y.L., Y.S., A.W. and B.Z.; funding acquisition, B.W.; project administration, K.L., P.C. and B.W.; software, K.L., X.W. and Y.L.; writing—original draft, K.L. and Y.S.; writing—review and editing, K.L. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Technology Innovation Guidance Project of Shaanxi Province (2017CGZH-HJ-01) to Wang, B. and Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province (2021ZDLNY01-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072410) to Cheng, P.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lulu Liao for his important help in this study; we also thank Xianhui Fu from Northwest A&F University and Shumin Dong from Minzu University of China for the technical assistance in the manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Steven, D.H. Morphogenesis in germinating Fusarium graminearum macroconidia. Mycologia 2005, 97, 880–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ni, M.; Fersetzaki, M.; Sun, S. Sex in Fungi. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 405–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Parry, D.; Jenkinson, P.; McLeod, L. Fusarium hear blight (scab) in small grain cereals—A review. Plant Pathol. 1995, 44, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nganje, W.E.; Bangsund, D.A.; Leistritz, F.L. Regional economic impacts of Fusarium head blight in wheat and barley. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2004, 26, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McMullen, M.; Jones, R.; Gallenberg, D. Scab of wheat and Barley: A re-emerging disease of devastating impact. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 1340–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hou, R.; Jin, Q.J. Research progress on biosynthesis pathway and regulation mechanism of mycotoxin DON in Fusarium graminearum. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2018, 46, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macho, A.P.; Zipfel, C. Targeting of plant pattern recognition receptor triggered immunity by bacterial type-III secretion system effectors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 23, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, M.; Tian, F.; Wamboldt, Y.; Alfano, J.R. The majority of the type III effector inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 can suppress plant immunity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009, 22, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Skibbe, D.S.; Doehlemann, G.; Fernandes, J.; Walbot, V. Maize tumors caused by Ustilago maydis require organ-specific genes in host and pathogen. Science 2010, 328, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qi, T.; Guo, J.; Liu, P.; He, F.; Wan, C.; Islam, A.; Tyler, B.M.; Kang, Z.; Guo, J. Stripe rust effector PstGSRE1 disrupts nuclear localization of ROS-promoting transcription factor TaLOL2 to defeat ROS-induced defense in wheat. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1624–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, Q.; Liu, Y.Y.; Naqvi, N.I. Fungal effectors at the crossroads of phytohormone signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Selin, C.; de Kievit, T.R.; Belmonte, M.F.; Fernando, W.G.D. Elucidating the role of effectors in plant-fungal interactions: Progress and challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shabab, M.; Shindo, T.; Gu, C.; Kaschani, F.; Pansuriya, T.; Chintha, R.; Harzen, A.; Colby, T.; Kamoun, S.; van der Hoorn, R.A. Fungal effector protein AVR2 targets diversifying defense-related Cys proteases of tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Esse, H.P.; Klooster, J.W.V.; Bolton, M.D.; Yadeta, K.A.; van Baarlen, P.; Boeren, S.; Vervoort, J.; de Wit, P.J.; Thomma, B.P. The Cladosporium fulvum virulence protein Avr2 inhibits host proteases required for basal defense. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1948–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tanaka, S.; Brefort, T.; Neidig, N.; Djamei, A.; Kahnt, J.; Vermerris, W.; Koenig, S.; Feussner, K.; Feussner, I.; Kahmann, R. A secreted Ustilago maydis effector promotes virulence by targeting anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize. eLife 2014, 3, e01355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hatahet, F.; Ruddock, L.W. Protein disulfide isomerase: A critical evaluation of its function in disulfide bond formation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2807–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ellgaard, L.; Ruddock, L.W. The human protein disulphide isomerase family: Substrate interactions and functional properties. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, X.-X.; Dai, Y.; Liu, H.-P.; Chen, S.-M.; Wang, C.-C. Contributions of protein disulfide isomerase domains to its chaperone activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 2000, 1, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Freedman, R.B.; Hirst, T.R.; Tuite, M.F. Protein disulphide isomerase: Building bridges in protein folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994, 19, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Clissold, P.M.; Bicknell, R. The thioredoxin-like fold: Hidden domains in protein disulfide isomerases and other chaperon proteins. BioEssays 2003, 25, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, X.; Lv, Z.M.; Zhao, Y.; Min, H.; Yang, W.J. MTH1745, a Protein Disulfide Isomerase-like Protein from Thermophilic Archaea Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicum Involving in Stress Response. Cell Stress Chaperones 2008, 13, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ondzighi, C.A.; Christopher, D.A.; Cho, E.J.; Cho, E.J.; Chang, S.C.; Staehelin, L.A. Arabidopsis protein disulfide isomerase-5 inhibits cysteine proteases during trafficking to vacuoles before programmed cell death of the endothelium in developing seeds. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2205–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Farquhar, R.; Honey, N.; Murant, S.J.; Bossier, P.; Schultz, L.; Montgomery, D.; Ellis, R.W.; Freedman, R.B.; Tuite, M.F. Protein disulfide isomerase is essential for viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 1991, 108, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tachibana, C.; Stevens, T.H. The yeast EUG1 gene encodes an endoplasmic reticulum protein that is functionally related to protein disulfide isomerase. Mol. Cell Biol. 1992, 12, 4601–4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tachikawa, H.; Takeuchi, Y.; Funahashi, W.; Miura, T.; Gao, X.D.; Fujimoto, D.; Mizunaga, T.; Onodera, K. Isolation and characterization of a yeast gene, MPD1, the overexpression of which suppresses inviability caused by protein disulfide isomerase depletion. FEBS Lett. 1995, 369, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stolf, B.S.; Smyrnias, I.; Lopes, L.R.; Vendramin, A.; Goto, H.; Laurindo, F.R.; Shah, A.M.; Santos, C.X. Protein disulfide isomerase and host-pathogen interaction. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Gu, B.; Huang, G.; Wang, Q.; Shan, W. The protein disulfide isomerase 1 of Phytophthora parasitica (PpPDI1) is associated with the haustoria-like structures and contributes to plant infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ben, K.N.; De, M.G.; Ratnam, J.; Kean-Hooi, A.K.; Arkin, M.; Mckerrow, J.; Chenik, M.A. High-throughput turbid metric assay for screening inhibitors of Leishmania major protein disulfide isomerase. J. Biomol. Screen. 2004, 16, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Habash, S.S.; Sobczak, M.; Siddique, S.; Voigt, B.; Elashry, A.; Grundler, F.M. Identification and characterization of a putative protein disulfide isomerase (HsPDI) as an alleged effector of Heterodera schachtii. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, Z.; Wang, Z.; Munawar, M.; Zheng, J. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Protein Disulfide Isomerase Gene (MgPDI2) from Meloidogyne graminicola. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, P.; Lüpken, T.; Habekuss, A.; Hensel, G.; Steuernagel, B.; Kilian, B.; Ariyadasa, R.; Himmelbach, A.; Kumlehn, J.; Scholz, U.; et al. Protein disulfide isomerase like 5-1 is a susceptibility factor to plant viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 6, 2104–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, J.H.; Hamari, Z.; Han, K.H.; Seo, J.A.; Reyes-Dominguez, Y.; Scazzocchio, C. Double-joint PCR: A PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004, 41, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Proctor, R.H.; Hohn, T.M.; McCormick, S.P. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichthecine toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1995, 8, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bruno, K.S.; Tenjo, F.; Li, L.; Hamer, J.E.; Xu, J.R. Cellular localization and role of kinase activity of PMK1 in Magnaporthe grisea. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Zheng, S.; Ju, Z.; Zhang, C.; Tang, G.; Wang, J.; Wen, Z.; Chen, W.; Ma, Z. Contribution of peroxisomal docking machinery to mycotoxin biosynthesis, pathogenicity and pexophagy in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 3224–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, C.; Ren, X.; Wang, X.; Wan, Q.; Ding, K.; Chen, L. FgRad50 regulates fungal development, pathogenicity, cell wall integrity and the DNA damage response in Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; He, M.; Liu, H.; Ding, H.; Liu, K.; Li, Y.; Cheng, P.; Li, Q.; Wang, B. Functional Characterization of the M36 Metalloprotease FgFly1 in Fusarium graminearum. J. Fungi 2022, 7, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jacobs, K.A.; Collins-Racie, L.A.; Colbert, M.; Duckett, M.; Golden-Fleet, M.; Kelleher, K.; Kriz, R.; LaVallie, E.R.; Merberg, D.; Spaulding, V.; et al. A genetic selection for isolating cDNAs encoding secreted proteins. Gene 1997, 198, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Bao, Y.; Duan, Z.; Wang, C.; Powell, C.A.; Chen, B.; Zhang, M.; Yao, W. Predication of the Effector Proteins Secreted by Fusarium sacchari Using Genomic Analysis and Heterogenous Expression. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, L.; Ren, Y.; Liu, F.; Peng, C.; Li, J.; Jin, X.; Wu, F.; et al. The failure to express a protein disulphide isomerase-like protein results in a floury endosperm and an endoplasmic reticulum stress response in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. He, J.; Sakamoto, T.; Song, Y.; Saito, A.; Harada, A.; Azakami, H.; Kato, A. Effect of EPS1 gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the secretion of foreign proteins which have disulfide bridges. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lamantia, M.; Miura, T.; Tachikawa, H.; Kaplan, H.A.; Lennarz, W.J.; Mizunaga, T. Glycosylation site binding protein and protein disulfide isomerase are identical and essential for cell viability in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 4453–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Solovyov, A.; Xiao, R.; Gilbert, H.F. Sulfhydryl oxidation, not disulfide isomerization, is the principal function of protein disulfide isomerase in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 34095–34100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, M.H.; Xie, X.L.; Lin, X.E.; Shi, J.X.; Ding, Z.J.; Ling, J.F. Functional characterization of the gene FoOCH1 encoding a putative a l, 6-mannosyltransferase in Fusarium oxvsporum f. sp. cubense. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014, 65, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Ma, Z. A transcription factor FgSte12 is required for pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 12155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Win, J.; Chaparro-Garcia, A.; Belhaj, K.; Saunders, D.G.O.; Yoshida, K.; Dong, S.; Schornack, S.; Zipfel, C.; Robatzek, S.; Hogenhout, S.A.; et al. Effector biology of plant-associated organisms: Concepts and perspectives. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2012, 77, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qi, Y.P.; Tsuda, K.; Glazebrook, J.; Katagiri, F. Physical association of pattern-triggered immunity (PTl) and effector-triggered immunity (ETl) immune receptors in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of FgEps1 deletion on mycelial growth and penetration of F. graminearum. (A) WT PH-1, ∆FgEps1 deletion mutant, and ∆FgEps1-C complemented strains were grown on PDA, complete medium (CM), and minimal medium (MM), respectively, at 25 °C for 3 days. Hyphal growth at the edges of PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C colonies is shown (bar = 20 μm). (B) Change in growth rate of wild-type PH-1, deletion mutant ∆FgEps1, and complemented ∆FgEps1-C per 12 h on PDA medium. (C) Penetration ability of 3-day-old PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C strains on cellophane. Each experiment was repeated three times. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The asterisks indicate a significant difference.
Figure 1. Effect of FgEps1 deletion on mycelial growth and penetration of F. graminearum. (A) WT PH-1, ∆FgEps1 deletion mutant, and ∆FgEps1-C complemented strains were grown on PDA, complete medium (CM), and minimal medium (MM), respectively, at 25 °C for 3 days. Hyphal growth at the edges of PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C colonies is shown (bar = 20 μm). (B) Change in growth rate of wild-type PH-1, deletion mutant ∆FgEps1, and complemented ∆FgEps1-C per 12 h on PDA medium. (C) Penetration ability of 3-day-old PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C strains on cellophane. Each experiment was repeated three times. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The asterisks indicate a significant difference.
Jof 09 01009 g001
Figure 2. Effects of FgEps1 deletion on asexual and sexual reproduction in F. graminearum. (A) Conidial morphology produced by 3 days incubation in CMC liquid medium is shown. (B) Conidia productions by F. graminearum strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C were measured by counting the number of conidia produced in 3-day-old CMC cultures. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. (C) Conidia of all strains were incubated in YEPD liquid medium at 25 °C for 2, 4, and 8 h, and then 100 spores were examined for spore germination. (D) Sexual reproduction status of each strain on carrot agar medium and morphology of ascospores after dissection of sexual ascospore shells (bar = 100 μm). (E) The unit area of ascospores produced by each strain on each 9 cm × 9 cm carrot agar medium is shown. Each experiment was repeated three times. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of FgEps1 deletion on asexual and sexual reproduction in F. graminearum. (A) Conidial morphology produced by 3 days incubation in CMC liquid medium is shown. (B) Conidia productions by F. graminearum strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C were measured by counting the number of conidia produced in 3-day-old CMC cultures. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. (C) Conidia of all strains were incubated in YEPD liquid medium at 25 °C for 2, 4, and 8 h, and then 100 spores were examined for spore germination. (D) Sexual reproduction status of each strain on carrot agar medium and morphology of ascospores after dissection of sexual ascospore shells (bar = 100 μm). (E) The unit area of ascospores produced by each strain on each 9 cm × 9 cm carrot agar medium is shown. Each experiment was repeated three times. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 09 01009 g002
Figure 3. Sensitivity of ΔFgEps1 to different stress factors. (A) Growth phenotypes of WT PH-1, ∆FgEps1 mutant, and ∆FgEps1-C complement in PDA medium with 0.25 ppm cyhalothrin, 0.2 g/L Congo red, 0.02% SDS, 1 M KCl, 1 M NaCl, 0.2 M MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5 M CaCl2, 0.75 g/L caffeine, 15 mM H2O2, CuSO4·5H2O, and 0.25 ppm tebuconazole, respectively, and cultured at 25 °C for 3 days. (B) Statistical analysis of the growth inhibition rate of the strains to the above-mentioned stressors is provided. Each experiment was repeated three times. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Sensitivity of ΔFgEps1 to different stress factors. (A) Growth phenotypes of WT PH-1, ∆FgEps1 mutant, and ∆FgEps1-C complement in PDA medium with 0.25 ppm cyhalothrin, 0.2 g/L Congo red, 0.02% SDS, 1 M KCl, 1 M NaCl, 0.2 M MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5 M CaCl2, 0.75 g/L caffeine, 15 mM H2O2, CuSO4·5H2O, and 0.25 ppm tebuconazole, respectively, and cultured at 25 °C for 3 days. (B) Statistical analysis of the growth inhibition rate of the strains to the above-mentioned stressors is provided. Each experiment was repeated three times. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 09 01009 g003
Figure 4. Effect of FgEps1 deficiency on the pathogenicity of F. graminearum. (A) The infection status of maize silk inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is displayed. Each experiment was repeated three times. (B) Disease 15 days after inoculation of flowering wheat heads with conidial suspensions of PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is shown. (C) Infection length of maize silk inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is presented. (D) Disease index and mean severity of wheat heads inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C are shown. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of FgEps1 deficiency on the pathogenicity of F. graminearum. (A) The infection status of maize silk inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is displayed. Each experiment was repeated three times. (B) Disease 15 days after inoculation of flowering wheat heads with conidial suspensions of PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is shown. (C) Infection length of maize silk inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C is presented. (D) Disease index and mean severity of wheat heads inoculated with strain PH-1, ∆FgEps1, and ∆FgEps1-C are shown. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Jof 09 01009 g004
Figure 5. Expression levels of FgEps1 during the period of F. graminearum infection and the effect on Tri gene clusters and DON toxin synthesis after deletion. (A) The relative transcription levels of 12 Tri genes in WT PH-1 and ∆FgEps1 are shown. For each gene, the expression level in PH-1 was normalized to 1. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. Significant differences compared with PH-1: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SDs of three biological replicates. (B) The levels of DON produced by each strain in infected spikelets collected from inoculated wheat heads are displayed. Bars denote standard deviations from four repeated experiments. (C) The expression levels of FgEps1 during F. graminearum infection are shown. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. Values on the same letters following the bars are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Expression levels of FgEps1 during the period of F. graminearum infection and the effect on Tri gene clusters and DON toxin synthesis after deletion. (A) The relative transcription levels of 12 Tri genes in WT PH-1 and ∆FgEps1 are shown. For each gene, the expression level in PH-1 was normalized to 1. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. Significant differences compared with PH-1: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SDs of three biological replicates. (B) The levels of DON produced by each strain in infected spikelets collected from inoculated wheat heads are displayed. Bars denote standard deviations from four repeated experiments. (C) The expression levels of FgEps1 during F. graminearum infection are shown. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. Values on the same letters following the bars are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Jof 09 01009 g005
Figure 6. Effect of FgEps1 on H2O2 and callose accumulation in N. benthamiana and analysis of its signal peptide secretion function. (A) Signal peptide prediction of FgEps1 using the Signal Peptide Secretion Prediction Tool is presented. (B) FgEps1 can inhibit Bax-induced cell death in N. benthamiana. (C) The yeast YTK12 strain carrying FgEps1 signal peptide fragment fused in pSUC2 vector was able to grow in CMD-W and YPRAA medium and induce TTC red response. (D) H2O2 content was measured in N. benthamiana leaves collected for 2 days. (E) N. benthamiana leaves collected for 2 days were used to measure callose content. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Effect of FgEps1 on H2O2 and callose accumulation in N. benthamiana and analysis of its signal peptide secretion function. (A) Signal peptide prediction of FgEps1 using the Signal Peptide Secretion Prediction Tool is presented. (B) FgEps1 can inhibit Bax-induced cell death in N. benthamiana. (C) The yeast YTK12 strain carrying FgEps1 signal peptide fragment fused in pSUC2 vector was able to grow in CMD-W and YPRAA medium and induce TTC red response. (D) H2O2 content was measured in N. benthamiana leaves collected for 2 days. (E) N. benthamiana leaves collected for 2 days were used to measure callose content. Bars denote standard deviations from three repeated experiments. The same letter on the bars for each treatment represents no significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 09 01009 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, K.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Ren, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhao, B.; Cheng, P.; Wang, B. Protein Disulfide Isomerase FgEps1 Is a Secreted Virulence Factor in Fusarium graminearum. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101009

AMA Style

Liu K, Wang X, Li Y, Shi Y, Ren Y, Wang A, Zhao B, Cheng P, Wang B. Protein Disulfide Isomerase FgEps1 Is a Secreted Virulence Factor in Fusarium graminearum. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(10):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Kouhan, Xintong Wang, Ying Li, Yifeng Shi, Yanyan Ren, Aolin Wang, Bingjie Zhao, Peng Cheng, and Baotong Wang. 2023. "Protein Disulfide Isomerase FgEps1 Is a Secreted Virulence Factor in Fusarium graminearum" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 10: 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101009

APA Style

Liu, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Shi, Y., Ren, Y., Wang, A., Zhao, B., Cheng, P., & Wang, B. (2023). Protein Disulfide Isomerase FgEps1 Is a Secreted Virulence Factor in Fusarium graminearum. Journal of Fungi, 9(10), 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9101009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop